Lightning-List Digest Archive

Mon 02/13/12


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:08 AM - Cover of General Aviation News (dfwilt@AOL.COM)
     2. 07:43 PM - Re: Running tank dry (selwyn)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:08:17 AM PST US
    Subject: Cover of General Aviation News
    From: dfwilt@AOL.COM
    Check out the cover of General Aviation News, February 10th edition! http://issuu.com/flyermedia/docs/20120210/1 Donna Wilt N616DW


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:43:43 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Running tank dry
    From: "selwyn" <selwyn@ellisworks.com.au>
    Hi Bob, A little delayed I know but I thought I would share my experience with running a tank dry. In October I (with my wife) flew our Lightning from our home in Horsham Victoria to Perth WA for a round trip of some 3000NM (plus sightseeing). On the way beck we had one long leg from Forrest in the middle of the Nullarbor to Port Pirie, north of Adelaide and I decided to run one tank to close to exhaustion to get a good handle on my fuel situation. In the event, about two minutes before the clock said zero fuel the tank ran dry. The engine did not cut dead but ran really rough and probably was not putting out much power. You will understand that this is my impression in the five seconds or so it took me to flick on the fuel pump and change tanks, I didn't stop to take notes :). In the event we covered the 530 mile leg in a tick over 4 hours with around 50 min fuel remaining which I think makes the Lightning a fair to middling cross country aeroplane. Overall we did 33 hours flying at 130kt TAS, 24lph fuel and just under one liter of oil all up. We had friends in a C172 XP accompanying us and they were 10 knots behind on speed and 10 lph ahead on fuel used. I think it an advantage that you don't have a "both" option on your fuel management. If you have both tanks on the engine stops when the first one runs dry and you then have to fiddle about turning tanks off to isolate the empty one by trial and error. Not a good idea. -------- Cheers, Selwyn Kit 66 VH-ELZ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=366247#366247




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   lightning-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Lightning-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/lightning-list
  • Browse Lightning-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/lightning-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --