M14PEngines-List Digest Archive

Mon 08/14/06


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 11:29 AM - Radial engine: more pro than con? (Chris In Madison)
     2. 11:56 AM - Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts (ScottA)
     3. 12:12 PM - Re: Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
     4. 12:16 PM - Re: Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts (A. Dennis Savarese)
     5. 12:24 PM - Re: Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts (ScottA)
     6. 02:49 PM - Re: Radial engine: more pro than con? (Adam Grosser)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:29:54 AM PST US
    Subject: Radial engine: more pro than con?
    From: "Chris In Madison" <cowens@cnw.com>
    --> M14PEngines-List message posted by: "Chris In Madison" <cowens@cnw.com> Hello all, I'm curious about the radial engine as a powerplant for the Murphy Moose and wondered how those flying The M14P feel about it. I've been perusing a number of sites dedicated to the Moose, spending a lot of time going through GoFLyAMoose.com and one or two others. On one of the sites, there was a rather detailed article going over the engine in general, and it made it out to be (or at least I read it that way) that the engine is a potential maintenance hassle. Oil seeping into the combustion chambers, broken/bent connecting rods, hydraulic lock, etc. The overall air of the article didn't seem positive to me. Are there any articles anyone can reference that discuss positive aspects of this engine? I'd love to see someone say something nice about it :-) Regardless, Murphy makes a pretty strong point that this engine has more power for half the price of a comparable Lyc or Continental. So with that in mind, do you feel that the radial is a reasonable fit for this plane, dollar for dollar? Can your average A/P maintain one of these engines, or would I need to seek out special service? Is the availabity of service parts good? I appreciate your insight. Thanks and best regards, Chris -------- Chris Owens Waunakee, WI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=54719#54719


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:56:09 AM PST US
    Subject: Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts
    From: "ScottA" <s-aldrich@comcast.net>
    --> M14PEngines-List message posted by: "ScottA" <s-aldrich@comcast.net> I stripped a brass exhaust clamp bolt. Any reason why I cant put an AN or stainless bolt in there with some high temp anti-seize on it instead? So far it appears to me (about 40 hours on my M14) if you can keep the exhaust and intake port nuts tight and the segmented exhaust section from leaking there is no reason to have ANY oil mess at all on the M14 under the cowl. Scott Moose 174 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=54725#54725


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:12:59 PM PST US
    Subject: Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts
    From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
    --> M14PEngines-List message posted by: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> I have put stainless hardware in there with no apparent issues that I could ever see. It's pretty hard to keep oil from seeping out of those segmented exhaust seals. There really is no "seal" there per se, other than a thin steel piece, followed by an asbestos bad covered in thin steel, followed by the clamp. This works fairly well for exhaust assuming that you keep it in "as new" condition, but oil seems to find a way to seep right through it. Not enough to drop down INSIDE the cowl though. In the same vein, it is amazing to learn all the places that the M-14 can leak oil. It's a real chore to keep anything running a radial completely dry of oil inside the cowl. Everyone tries...but there is usually one darn leak somewhere that is really hard to nail down. :-=) Good luck, Mark Bitterlich N50YK -----Original Message----- From: owner-m14pengines-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-m14pengines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of ScottA Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 14:56 Subject: M14PEngines-List: Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts --> M14PEngines-List message posted by: "ScottA" <s-aldrich@comcast.net> I stripped a brass exhaust clamp bolt. Any reason why I canEUR(tm)t put an AN or stainless bolt in there with some high temp anti-seize on it instead? So far it appears to me (about 40 hours on my M14) if you can keep the exhaust and intake port nuts tight and the segmented exhaust section from leaking there is no reason to have ANY oil mess at all on the M14 under the cowl. Scott Moose 174 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=54725#54725


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:16:04 PM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts
    --> M14PEngines-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com> No reason at all. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "ScottA" <s-aldrich@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 1:55 PM Subject: M14PEngines-List: Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts > --> M14PEngines-List message posted by: "ScottA" <s-aldrich@comcast.net> > > I stripped a brass exhaust clamp bolt. Any reason why I can?Tt put an AN > or stainless bolt in there with some high temp anti-seize on it instead? > > So far it appears to me (about 40 hours on my M14) if you can keep the > exhaust and intake port nuts tight and the segmented exhaust section from > leaking there is no reason to have ANY oil mess at all on the M14 under > the cowl. > > Scott > Moose 174 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=54725#54725 > > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:24:45 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Russian Brass Exhaust Clamp bolts
    From: "ScottA" <s-aldrich@comcast.net>
    --> M14PEngines-List message posted by: "ScottA" <s-aldrich@comcast.net> Thanks guys. I know I will never be "oil free" but it is way cleaner than I expected (so far). I was surprised how loose the intake port nuts were - I didn't check them until about an hour on the motor. Probably could have tightened them from the get go. The few I have seen with the newer aftermarket, slip joint exhaust ($$) are very nice. Scott Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=54741#54741


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:49:26 PM PST US
    Subject: Radial engine: more pro than con?
    From: "Adam Grosser" <adam@foundationcap.com>
    Hi Chris: I don't have a Murphy Moose (although I am a great fan of the design). I do have an M14 powered Pitts Model 12. I have nothing but good things to say about the engine. It starts easily hot or cold, puts out a ton of power, and is easy to maintain. On the downside, it is a radial, so it does both consume and drip more oil than a typical flat-opposed aircraft engine. You can avoid most of the unpleasant aspects common to all radial engines with a combination of a few parts, and a few diligent procedures. I'd heartily recommend all of the parts that Jim Kimball Enterprises sells for the M14. They have a fitting kit that converts all the Russian fittings to standard AN hardware. They make an intake drain kit, an oil shut-off, and a sump pump. By installing these three items, you will mitigate most of the oil dripping, hydraulic lock problems. They have recently come out with their own exhaust which is significantly lighter and easier to install than the Russian exhausts. On the operations side I do the following before each flight: open the intake drain. Pull the propeller through 18 blades to clear the lower cylinders. Close the intake drain, and go fly. Upon return, shut off the oil, run the sump pump until the oil is cleared, and re-open the intake drain. Never had anything remotely problematic. Lastly, I love the pneumatic start. I know a bunch of the Moose folks have opted for the electric starter option, but I've had great luck with the air system. Good luck Adam ________________________________ From: owner-m14pengines-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Chris In Madison Sent: Mon 8/14/2006 11:29 AM Subject: M14PEngines-List: Radial engine: more pro than con? --> M14PEngines-List message posted by: "Chris In Madison" <cowens@cnw.com> Hello all, I'm curious about the radial engine as a powerplant for the Murphy Moose and wondered how those flying The M14P feel about it. I've been perusing a number of sites dedicated to the Moose, spending a lot of time going through GoFLyAMoose.com and one or two others. On one of the sites, there was a rather detailed article going over the engine in general, and it made it out to be (or at least I read it that way) that the engine is a potential maintenance hassle. Oil seeping into the combustion chambers, broken/bent connecting rods, hydraulic lock, etc. The overall air of the article didn't seem positive to me. Are there any articles anyone can reference that discuss positive aspects of this engine? I'd love to see someone say something nice about it :-) Regardless, Murphy makes a pretty strong point that this engine has more power for half the price of a comparable Lyc or Continental. So with that in mind, do you feel that the radial is a reasonable fit for this plane, dollar for dollar? Can your average A/P maintain one of these engines, or would I need to seek out special service? Is the availabity of service parts good? I appreciate your insight. Thanks and best regards, Chris -------- Chris Owens Waunakee, WI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=54719#54719 ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ==========




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   m14pengines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/M14PEngines-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/m14pengines-list
  • Browse M14PEngines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/m14pengines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --