Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 04:58 AM - Re: M-14P Not Flown in Three Years ()
2. 06:25 AM - Re: M-14P Not Flown in Three Years (George Coy)
3. 12:33 PM - Re: Tachometer (HBaker)
4. 12:34 PM - Re: Tachometer (HBaker)
5. 12:35 PM - Re: M-14P Not Flown in Three Years (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
6. 12:54 PM - Hoses (HBaker)
7. 06:02 PM - Re: Hoses (B-L Pollock)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: M-14P Not Flown in Three Years |
Pete, I don't know the specifics on M-14s regarding this, but I do know that
if it had auto gas in the carb there is a potential problem with "varnish".
Not a problem if it had avgas in it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "peteairways" <peteairways@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 3:43 PM
Subject: M14PEngines-List: M-14P Not Flown in Three Years
> <peteairways@yahoo.com>
>
> I recently put a deposit on a Yak-55M that has not flown in about 3-years.
> A condition inspection was just done on the aircraft. The engine was run
> and checked over per requirements of the condition inspection and given a
> good bill of health.
>
> My question is this: Do I need to worry about any of the parts in the fuel
> system not working properly from sitting idle for 3-years?(ie
> auto-mixture, aneroids, valves in the fuel tanks etc.) Any advice on what
> I should look out for on the little used M-14 would be appreciated!
>
> Thanks, Pete
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=226750#226750
>
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | M-14P Not Flown in Three Years |
You may experience some oil leaks at some point. The only other issues may
be high oil consumption due to corrosion in the cylinders. The more
important issues are the hoses and things like that.
George Coy
Coy Aircraft Sales
714 Airport Rd.
Swanton VT 05488
802-868-5633 off
802-363-5782 cell
george.coy@gmail.com
SKYPE george.coy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-m14pengines-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-m14pengines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
peteairways
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 3:43 PM
Subject: M14PEngines-List: M-14P Not Flown in Three Years
--> <peteairways@yahoo.com>
I recently put a deposit on a Yak-55M that has not flown in about 3-years. A
condition inspection was just done on the aircraft. The engine was run and
checked over per requirements of the condition inspection and given a good
bill of health.
My question is this: Do I need to worry about any of the parts in the fuel
system not working properly from sitting idle for 3-years?(ie auto-mixture,
aneroids, valves in the fuel tanks etc.) Any advice on what I should look
out for on the little used M-14 would be appreciated!
Thanks, Pete
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=226750#226750
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Thanks Dennis I have decided on the tachometer on the Moose, since I only need
the Tack, a lot simpler.
Thanks Henry
--------
Currently building a Murphy Moose - any help would be appreciated.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=226913#226913
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
The P2 1000 [Embarassed]
--------
Currently building a Murphy Moose - any help would be appreciated.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=226914#226914
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | M-14P Not Flown in Three Years |
Pay particular attention to the fuel vents and make sure they are not
clogged with ANYTHING. Especially little bugs that build nests in tiny
little openings, which happened to me when my 50 sat for just one week
at Kissimmee Florida. Other than that, other folks covered all the
really important stuff, like hoses and varnish. Some 55's also did not
come with a stock air system. Some had them added, modified, etc. etc.
That said, you should consider pulling your air tank, and have it
inspected for internal corrosion and then have it pressure checked.
Make several taxi checks and make sure your brakes are freaking perfect.
A brake issue in a tail dragger is bad juju, especially a high
performance version.
Good luck... Great airplane.
Mark Bitterlich
N50YK
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-m14pengines-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-m14pengines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
peteairways
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 3:43 PM
Subject: M14PEngines-List: M-14P Not Flown in Three Years
--> <peteairways@yahoo.com>
I recently put a deposit on a Yak-55M that has not flown in about
3-years. A condition inspection was just done on the aircraft. The
engine was run and checked over per requirements of the condition
inspection and given a good bill of health.
My question is this: Do I need to worry about any of the parts in the
fuel system not working properly from sitting idle for 3-years?(ie
auto-mixture, aneroids, valves in the fuel tanks etc.) Any advice on
what I should look out for on the little used M-14 would be appreciated!
Thanks, Pete
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=226750#226750
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I am starting to hook up the engine oil hoses, are you guys using 601 hoses and
816 fittings , does # 12 sound right?
Cheers Henry
--------
Currently building a Murphy Moose - any help would be appreciated.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=226920#226920
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi Henry just finished my oil system for the M-14 with -12 hose fittings for
oil delivery to oil filter oil tank and cooler there is -4 fittings for the
oil clean kit .
Bill
Moose 244
----- Original Message -----
From: "HBaker" <henry.baker@nf.sympatico.ca>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: M14PEngines-List: Hoses
> <henry.baker@nf.sympatico.ca>
>
> I am starting to hook up the engine oil hoses, are you guys using 601
> hoses and 816 fittings , does # 12 sound right?
>
> Cheers Henry
>
> --------
> Currently building a Murphy Moose - any help would be appreciated.
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=226920#226920
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
7:08 AM
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|