Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Tue 01/20/04


Total Messages Posted: 23



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:00 AM - Re: Cutting plywood (Jack Phillips)
     2. 05:00 AM - Ted's advice--and flaring too HIGH  (Michael D Cuy)
     3. 05:27 AM - Re: Wood landing gear question (Michael D Cuy)
     4. 07:58 AM - The best Pietenpol article yet..... (Jim Markle)
     5. 10:01 AM - Re: landings (Hodgson, Mark O)
     6. 11:20 AM - Re: horizontal stab dimensions (Rick Holland)
     7. 11:40 AM - Re: The best Pietenpol article yet..... (walt evans)
     8. 11:46 AM - ZS-VJA Flies (Norman Stapelberg)
     9. 11:52 AM - congratulations, Mark ! (Michael D Cuy)
    10. 11:54 AM - Control Surface deflexions (Norman Stapelberg)
    11. 12:02 PM - Re: horizontal stab dimensions (Mike)
    12. 12:03 PM - Re: ZS-VJA Flies (walt evans)
    13. 01:58 PM - Re: Control Surface deflexions (walt evans)
    14. 03:18 PM - definition of sweep (Christian Bobka)
    15. 03:41 PM - Re: Cutting plywood (Carl Loar)
    16. 04:09 PM - Re: Control Surface deflections (DJ Vegh)
    17. 04:12 PM - elevator/rudder control cable tension and slack (DJ Vegh)
    18. 04:37 PM - Re: Cutting plywood (Alex Sloan)
    19. 05:13 PM - Re: Cutting plywood (Alex Sloan)
    20. 05:17 PM - Re: ZS-VJA Flies (Alex Sloan)
    21. 05:40 PM - Re: horizontal stab dimensions (Brants)
    22. 06:00 PM - Re: Ted's advice--and flaring too HIGH  (Graham Hansen)
    23. 06:39 PM - Re: horizontal stab dimensions (Christian Bobka)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:00:19 AM PST US
    From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Cutting plywood
    I guess I got off lucky - I only had 14 stitches in my thumb after violating rule #2. Be VERY careful as the cutter finishes piercing the metal. At that point it can have a tendency to "bite" into the work piece and can pull it out of your hand over even out of the clamps holding it to the bench if you are not careful. I consider the fly cutter to be one of the most dangerous tools in the shop. Be sure there is somebody home who can drive you to the hospital while you are using it. Seriously. Jack -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Christian Bobka Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Two rules of fly cutting. Never use it in anything BUT a drill press. Never hold the item being flycut in your hand. It MUST be clamped to the drill press table and you have one hand on the downfeed and the other poised over the off switch. That way you never have to look away from the work until after the drill press is shut off. Chris Bobka who drove his USMC aviator buddy to the hospital for 30+ stiches in his palm after he violated rule 2. chris bobka ----- Original Message ----- From: Clif Dawson <mailto:cdawson5854@shaw.ca> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Don't use this thing in a hand drill. It is very much out of balance with one cutter way off center, and be very careful of it in a drill press. It has a lot of torque so take it easy. There is one I've seen with a counter weight on the opposite side but most don't. It does work quite well in a drill press following Walt's rules. If you want to cut thick material drill the center hole first and it will go easier. There is another fly cutter. It's a very small knife. Buzzzz. Clif ----- Original Message ----- From: walt evans <mailto:wbeevans@verizon.net> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Here is one pic I found on the net. It's adjustable for hole size. The BIG trick for a good hole is to cut about half way thru on one side and turn wood over to finish. This way no raggid edges walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Gnwac@cs.com <mailto:Gnwac@cs.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood What is a FLY CUTTER? Greg Delaware


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:00:40 AM PST US
    From: Michael D Cuy <Michael.D.Cuy@grc.nasa.gov>
    Subject: Ted's advice--and flaring too HIGH
    > <003401c3daa0$c3e43000$b50ba5d1@LOU> <007101c3dba2$0ad7b700$0101a8c0@domain> --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Michael D Cuy <Michael.D.Cuy@grc.nasa.gov> Ted B's words on landings in a Piet were right on with what I've experienced and Ted has more time in a Piet than I do plus has been flying since I was 5 years old. Gosh Ted, you must have gotten your ticket when you were 16 ! You are not that old !! The only words I would add to what Ted had to say is that first time flights in a Piet/GN-1, the pilots tend to flare too high. You just are not accustomed to being that low to the ground (visually) in anything you've ever flown before. I looks like you are going to burry the plane on flare but you don't. Just like in a 'tall' taildragger like a Stearman, my first desire was to "make it look right by making it look like what I see on the Piet during landing." That was a mistake. Each plane has it's "view" during the touchdown and the best way to etch that view in your mind is to sit on the runway or taxiway and visualize where the horizon crosses thru your nose---get that picture in your head before you fly it and when you flare, that is the view you need to see to feel for mother earth. Sounds simple, but it works if you study it before your flight. Mike C. in balmy 6 F weather !


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:27:53 AM PST US
    From: Michael D Cuy <Michael.D.Cuy@grc.nasa.gov>
    Subject: Re: Wood landing gear question
    > <013001c3da49$5eaa6940$0101a8c0@domain> <002801c3db0c$21e126c0$57c5fea9@mke> <005e01c3dbbe$1a2f9120$d401a8c0@Alex> <044301c3dd64$6004c7e0$ceddf6ce@hjarrett> >Does the bottom ash block on each landing gear get glued to the legs or is >it just held in place only with the metal fittings? > Ted-- I got as tight of fit there as I could and T-88'ed those pieces together. First I held them in place with masking tape to get my fittings formed just right so they would not put any force on the legs or ash piece and then glued the blocks in and later did the varnishing, etc. Mike C.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:58:44 AM PST US
    From: "Jim Markle" <jim_markle@mindspring.com>
    Subject: The best Pietenpol article yet.....
    Well, I think it's just about the best one I've seen..... "The Pasture Pilot's Pride & Joy" was published in 1965 and it's a great article about the Pietenpol Air Camper with some mention of the Sky Scout...... This is a good one...... If you'll go into your browser's internet options and disable "Automatic Image Resizing", the pages will display in a size that you can print on your printer at just about the same quality as the original. Or you can save the file to your local drive. It's in the File Library section of mykitplane.com: <http://www.mykitplane.com/Planes/filesList2.cfm?AlbumID43> Enjoy JM


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:01:05 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: landings
    From: "Hodgson, Mark O" <mhodgson@bu.edu>
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Hodgson, Mark O" <mhodgson@bu.edu> FWIW, I got my tailwheel endorsement yesterday, so when my instructor said I was "almost there" on New Year's day he meant it. It was the first time I've flown since then, and a chilly, gusty day in southern New Hampshire (but then, we've been getting your Canadian Arctic air a lot the past couple of weeks). Good for demonstrating cross-wind wheel landings, and from the looks of your note I'll need that skill someday when I'm ready to fly my Piet. Thanks again to the list for all of the useful comments, Mark Hodgson


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:20:00 AM PST US
    From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@speedtrail.net>
    Subject: Re: horizontal stab dimensions
    Tom My long (172 3/8) fuselage plans (Supplementary Plans) shows the distance from the tailpost to the back of the turtledeck 18 7/8" not 19 3/8". Thats only a 7/8" difference. Still makes you wonder if you should build the stab 18" or 18 7/8" wide. Rick H Alex Sloan wrote: > Chris, > I am building the long fuselage and would appreciate the information > you worked up on larger stabs. > Thanks > Alex Sloan > alexms@bellsouth.net <mailto:alexms@bellsouth.net> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Brants <mailto:tmbrant@usfamily.net> > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > <mailto:pietenpol-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 9:51 PM > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions > > Chris, > > I am the one that asked the original question.... You're correct > in saying that the drawings stand alone, however if I'd been smart > I could have figured on making a larger stabilizer... > > According to your comments (if I interpreted correctly) the 172 > 3/8" fuse (this is what I have) requires a larger stabilizer (and > elevator??)... My previous post asks this question - can I use > the 18" stab (and elevator) now that they're built, or do I need > to modify or rebuild? > > I would be interested in getting a copy of your article on this. > > Thanks, > > Tom Brant > Brooklyn Park, MN > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Christian Bobka <mailto:bobka@compuserve.com> > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > <mailto:pietenpol-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 8:44 PM > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions > > Walt, > > You are concerned with a concept called tail volume. Tail > volume is the square inch area of the horizontal surface > (elevator and satbilizer together) times the distance in > inches from the center of pressure of the horizontal > stabilizer to the Center of Gravity, this being the point of > rotation about which the aircraft moves based on input of the > controls. > > As there are three wood fuselages that I know of, namely the > version in the F&G manual and on the Hoopman drawings at 161 > inches, the 1933 "Improved Aircamper" at 163 inches, and the > fuselage designed for the Corvair at 172.375 inches, I am not > sure which one you mean. I always called the Corvair fuselage > the Pavliga long fuselage because, well, it is the longest and > it is the fuselage used on Sky Gypsy. > > Anyway, if you take the square inch area of each horizontal > design times the distance in inches from the loaded CG to the > 33% chord point on each stabilizer design, you will come up > with the tail volume...volume because the units will now be > cubic inches. The hardest thing will be to figure out your > loaded CG. > > If you make the distance between the CG to the CP of the > stabilizer longer, you can get by with a smaller stabilizer > area. Shorten up the CG to CP distance and you need to > increase the tail area. > > My analysis of the different fuselages leads me to believe > that using the 172.375 fuselage moves the seats back faster > than the tail gets longer so it actually puts the CG further > aft than on the shorter fuselages. This means that the CG to > Cp of the stabilizer is actually a shorter distance so a > bigger area stabilizer is needed. > > Unfortunately, the 172.375" fuselage drawing is a stand > alone. No landing gear was ever published for it and neither > is there a obviously a stabilizer. > > I wrote an article on gear placement on the 172.375 inch > fuselage that was to be published in the Grant MacLaren > published BPA NL but it never made it because the very issue > it was to be published in was never published as he quit the > post. I will dig it out. Only a hard copy exists, and even > it is one of the drafts, so I will have to scan it to OCR > software and see if I can post it. > > I hope this helps. I wish people said what inch fuselage they > have when they talk of stuff like this as it really matters > (or maybe it doesn't since they all seem to meet each > aviator's expectations) > > Chris Bobka > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: walt evans <mailto:wbeevans@verizon.net> > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > <mailto:pietenpol-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 7:04 PM > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions > > I didn't know they were different. I built the long fuse > and the tail was from the original prints, so I guess I > got the wrong one. but flies great. What two prints show > different tails??? > walt evans > NX140DL > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Brants <mailto:tmbrant@usfamily.net> > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > <mailto:pietenpol-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:37 PM > Subject: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions > > I built the long fuselage and then (idiodically) built > the horiz. stab for the short fuse (18" wide instead > of 19 3/8") - didn't realize until today when I tried > fitting it up. Question: can I glue a wider leading > edge to the horizontal stab to make up the > difference? Obviously this would add a bit of weight > to the tail section.. Or could I just fill in behind > the turtle deck to take up the space? Difference is > about 1 3/8". Is the 1 3/8" width going to be missed > if I leave it out? Does this cause a problem getting > away from the 'airfoil shape'? > > Another related question: does the horiz. stab get > bolted through the longerons? > > Any help on this would be appreciated. > > Tom Brant > Brooklyn Park, MN > > > > > ------ USFamily.Net <http://www.usfamily.net/info> - > > > ------ USFamily.Net <http://www.usfamily.net/info> - Unlimited > Internet - From $8.99/mo! ------ >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:40:07 AM PST US
    From: "walt evans" <wbeevans@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: The best Pietenpol article yet.....
    Jim, Thanks, I really enjoyed that article and pictures. The core of why I built a Pietenpol. walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Markle To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:58 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: The best Pietenpol article yet..... Well, I think it's just about the best one I've seen..... "The Pasture Pilot's Pride & Joy" was published in 1965 and it's a great article about the Pietenpol Air Camper with some mention of the Sky Scout...... This is a good one...... If you'll go into your browser's internet options and disable "Automatic Image Resizing", the pages will display in a size that you can print on your printer at just about the same quality as the original. Or you can save the file to your local drive. It's in the File Library section of mykitplane.com: <http://www.mykitplane.com/Planes/filesList2.cfm?AlbumID43> Enjoy JM


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:46:54 AM PST US
    From: "Norman Stapelberg" <norshel@mweb.co.za>
    Subject: ZS-VJA Flies
    Hi all Just thought I'd pop in a quick note my baby flew Sunday for the first time in two years. Got some small mods to do, 1. prop to be repitched (only getting 2000Rpm static). 2. Battery to be moved C of G tad to far fwd. 3. A.S.I to be calibrated Regards, Norman Stapelberg ZS-VJA (115Hrs) South Africa FASI


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:52:36 AM PST US
    From: Michael D Cuy <Michael.D.Cuy@grc.nasa.gov>
    Subject: congratulations, Mark !
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Michael D Cuy <Michael.D.Cuy@grc.nasa.gov> >--> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Hodgson, Mark O" <mhodgson@bu.edu> >FWIW, I got my tailwheel endorsement yesterday, Way to go, Mark !!!


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:54:56 AM PST US
    From: "Norman Stapelberg" <norshel@mweb.co.za>
    Subject: Control Surface deflexions
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Norman Stapelberg" <norshel@mweb.co.za> Hi all Just thought I'd throw this one out there, my pilot/instructor says that I need control surface stop put in. Just by the way what must the deflexions be for the control surfaces? I cannot seem to find them any where. Regards, Norman Stapelberg ZS-VJA (115Hrs) South Africa FASI


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:02:31 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: horizontal stab dimensions
    From: Mike <bike.mike@verizon.net>
    MIME_QP_LONG_LINE Rick, If it really bothers a builder to have to build a cover for the gap, it might be cheaper to build the turtle deck longer. I don't think anyone has ever complained that a properly configured Piet has insufficient horizontal stabilizer area, though it is well documented that large, covered, wheels make it want some more vertical stabilizer. You probably can't hurt the design by enlarging the horizontal stab area, but be sure to keep the front flying wires the same distance from the leading edge. Tail flutter hasn't historically been a problem but, considering how limber the thin stab is, you don't want to be the first to flutter test it. Mike Hardaway on 1/20/04 11:19, Rick Holland at at7000ft@speedtrail.net wrote: Tom My long (172 3/8) fuselage plans (Supplementary Plans) shows the distance from the tailpost to the back of the turtledeck 18 7/8" not 19 3/8". Thats only a 7/8" difference. Still makes you wonder if you should build the stab 18" or 18 7/8" wide. Rick H


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:03:11 PM PST US
    From: "walt evans" <wbeevans@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: ZS-VJA Flies
    Norman, Good for you! I've seen alot of things from my Piet, but never a giraffe ,elephant or hippo (Oh my) walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Norman Stapelberg To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:46 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: ZS-VJA Flies Hi all Just thought I'd pop in a quick note my baby flew Sunday for the first time in two years. Got some small mods to do, 1.. prop to be repitched (only getting 2000Rpm static). 2.. Battery to be moved C of G tad to far fwd. 3.. A.S.I to be calibrated Regards, Norman Stapelberg ZS-VJA (115Hrs) South Africa FASI


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:58:59 PM PST US
    From: "walt evans" <wbeevans@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Control Surface deflexions
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "walt evans" <wbeevans@verizon.net> Norman, I put stops for aileron deflection only, as per my DAR. Small wood blocks glued in place on the floor, topped with leather for the torque horns to "bump" on. They hit the blocks 'just before' the lower part of the aileron contacts the wing. As for the elevator/rudder, explained that they all had complete free movement with no possibility of interference with each other, so the DAR accepted that. walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Norman Stapelberg" <norshel@mweb.co.za> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Control Surface deflexions > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Norman Stapelberg" <norshel@mweb.co.za> > > > Hi all > > Just thought I'd throw this one out there, my pilot/instructor says that > I need control surface stop put in. Just by the way what must the > deflexions be for the control surfaces? I cannot seem to find them any > where. > > Regards, > Norman Stapelberg > ZS-VJA (115Hrs) > South Africa > FASI > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:18:11 PM PST US
    From: "Christian Bobka" <bobka@compuserve.com>
    Subject: definition of sweep
    I had a question as to what I meant by sweep of the axle. The sweep is how far back from the center of the front landing gear attach point the axle is located. If the axle had zero sweep, it would be located directly under the center of the front landing gear attach fitting with the fuselage leveled longitudinally. A 5 inch sweep would have the axle mounted directly beneath a point 5 inches aft of the center of the from landing gear attach point. Chris Bobka ----- Original Message ----- From: MacklemAW@aol.com To: bobka@compuserve.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:48 AM Subject: Axle Positioning Chris, Please define "sweep" of the axle for me. Allan W. Macklem TEL: 402 289 2298 FAX: 402 289 3474 "Personal growth comes from being surrounded by smarter people."


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:41:57 PM PST US
    From: "Carl Loar" <skycarl@buckeye-express.com>
    Subject: Re: Cutting plywood
    I agree with Jack, this type of flycutter is very tricky to use. ( there is also a flycutter that's used with milling machines to smooth large sufaces) If you are going to use this, use clamps to secure the work and imagine the area that the work would spin in if it started rotating.Then keep all body parts out of that area. Also, make sure that the cutters are tight on the piece. There are cutters with tools on both sides. If your going to use one, this type is best as the cut is balanced. I believe harbor frieght carries that type. Please use with caution. Carl ----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Phillips To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:59 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood I guess I got off lucky - I only had 14 stitches in my thumb after violating rule #2. Be VERY careful as the cutter finishes piercing the metal. At that point it can have a tendency to "bite" into the work piece and can pull it out of your hand over even out of the clamps holding it to the bench if you are not careful. I consider the fly cutter to be one of the most dangerous tools in the shop. Be sure there is somebody home who can drive you to the hospital while you are using it. Seriously. Jack -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Christian Bobka Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:26 AM To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Two rules of fly cutting. Never use it in anything BUT a drill press. Never hold the item being flycut in your hand. It MUST be clamped to the drill press table and you have one hand on the downfeed and the other poised over the off switch. That way you never have to look away from the work until after the drill press is shut off. Chris Bobka who drove his USMC aviator buddy to the hospital for 30+ stiches in his palm after he violated rule 2. chris bobka ----- Original Message ----- From: Clif Dawson To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:02 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Don't use this thing in a hand drill. It is very much out of balance with one cutter way off center, and be very careful of it in a drill press. It has a lot of torque so take it easy. There is one I've seen with a counter weight on the opposite side but most don't. It does work quite well in a drill press following Walt's rules. If you want to cut thick material drill the center hole first and it will go easier. There is another fly cutter. It's a very small knife. Buzzzz. Clif ----- Original Message ----- From: walt evans To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Here is one pic I found on the net. It's adjustable for hole size. The BIG trick for a good hole is to cut about half way thru on one side and turn wood over to finish. This way no raggid edges walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Gnwac@cs.com To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 1:59 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood What is a FLY CUTTER? Greg Delaware


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:09:55 PM PST US
    From: "DJ Vegh" <djv@imagedv.com>
    Subject: Re: Control Surface deflections
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "DJ Vegh" <djv@imagedv.com> on the subject of control cable deflections..... how many degrees are we looking for in the elevator and rudder? DJ Vegh N74DV Mesa, AZ www.imagedv.com/aircamper -


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:12:10 PM PST US
    From: "DJ Vegh" <djv@imagedv.com>
    Subject: elevator/rudder control cable tension and slack
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "DJ Vegh" <djv@imagedv.com> How many pounds should the elevator and rudder control cables be set to? Also, is it common for the elevator cables to lose some tension and slack when actuating the stick? For instance.... my elevator "up" pull cable is tight when pulling the stick back, but the "down" pull cable loses some tension and slacks slightly. Is this a bad thing? DJ Vegh N74DV Mesa, AZ www.imagedv.com/aircamper -


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:37:13 PM PST US
    From: "Alex Sloan" <alexms1@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Cutting plywood
    Chris, Another rule for using the fly cutter, feed it into the material SLOWLY. Alex Sloan ----- Original Message ----- From: Christian Bobka To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:26 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Two rules of fly cutting. Never use it in anything BUT a drill press. Never hold the item being flycut in your hand. It MUST be clamped to the drill press table and you have one hand on the downfeed and the other poised over the off switch. That way you never have to look away from the work until after the drill press is shut off. Chris Bobka who drove his USMC aviator buddy to the hospital for 30+ stiches in his palm after he violated rule 2. chris bobka ----- Original Message ----- From: Clif Dawson To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:02 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Don't use this thing in a hand drill. It is very much out of balance with one cutter way off center, and be very careful of it in a drill press. It has a lot of torque so take it easy. There is one I've seen with a counter weight on the opposite side but most don't. It does work quite well in a drill press following Walt's rules. If you want to cut thick material drill the center hole first and it will go easier. There is another fly cutter. It's a very small knife. Buzzzz. Clif ----- Original Message ----- From: walt evans To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Here is one pic I found on the net. It's adjustable for hole size. The BIG trick for a good hole is to cut about half way thru on one side and turn wood over to finish. This way no raggid edges walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Gnwac@cs.com To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 1:59 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood What is a FLY CUTTER? Greg Delaware


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:13:05 PM PST US
    From: "Alex Sloan" <alexms1@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Cutting plywood
    Carl, The only accident I have witnesse was with one of those double cutting fly cutters with cutters on both sides. They scare me. I have not seen any one mention where to buy the fly cutters..Sears has two sizes to offer. They do not call them fly cutters. Cannot recall their designation for them. My advice for any one using one, be sure the work is clamped down tightly and there is clerance for the tool on all sides. To get an acurate hole cut I found it best to use a piece of scrap to use to make a small cut then measure the diameter to see if it is what is desired. If the work piece is not clamped securely chatter is a possibility and the tool will not cut as you want. Alex Sloan ----- Original Message ----- From: Carl Loar To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:41 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood I agree with Jack, this type of flycutter is very tricky to use. ( there is also a flycutter that's used with milling machines to smooth large sufaces) If you are going to use this, use clamps to secure the work and imagine the area that the work would spin in if it started rotating.Then keep all body parts out of that area. Also, make sure that the cutters are tight on the piece. There are cutters with tools on both sides. If your going to use one, this type is best as the cut is balanced. I believe harbor frieght carries that type. Please use with caution. Carl ----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Phillips To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:59 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood I guess I got off lucky - I only had 14 stitches in my thumb after violating rule #2. Be VERY careful as the cutter finishes piercing the metal. At that point it can have a tendency to "bite" into the work piece and can pull it out of your hand over even out of the clamps holding it to the bench if you are not careful. I consider the fly cutter to be one of the most dangerous tools in the shop. Be sure there is somebody home who can drive you to the hospital while you are using it. Seriously. Jack -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Christian Bobka Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:26 AM To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Two rules of fly cutting. Never use it in anything BUT a drill press. Never hold the item being flycut in your hand. It MUST be clamped to the drill press table and you have one hand on the downfeed and the other poised over the off switch. That way you never have to look away from the work until after the drill press is shut off. Chris Bobka who drove his USMC aviator buddy to the hospital for 30+ stiches in his palm after he violated rule 2. chris bobka ----- Original Message ----- From: Clif Dawson To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:02 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Don't use this thing in a hand drill. It is very much out of balance with one cutter way off center, and be very careful of it in a drill press. It has a lot of torque so take it easy. There is one I've seen with a counter weight on the opposite side but most don't. It does work quite well in a drill press following Walt's rules. If you want to cut thick material drill the center hole first and it will go easier. There is another fly cutter. It's a very small knife. Buzzzz. Clif ----- Original Message ----- From: walt evans To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood Here is one pic I found on the net. It's adjustable for hole size. The BIG trick for a good hole is to cut about half way thru on one side and turn wood over to finish. This way no raggid edges walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Gnwac@cs.com To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 1:59 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cutting plywood What is a FLY CUTTER? Greg Delaware


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:17:33 PM PST US
    From: "Alex Sloan" <alexms1@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: ZS-VJA Flies
    Great going Norman. Keep us informed. Alex S. ----- Original Message ----- From: Norman Stapelberg To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:46 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: ZS-VJA Flies Hi all Just thought I'd pop in a quick note my baby flew Sunday for the first time in two years. Got some small mods to do, 1.. prop to be repitched (only getting 2000Rpm static). 2.. Battery to be moved C of G tad to far fwd. 3.. A.S.I to be calibrated Regards, Norman Stapelberg ZS-VJA (115Hrs) South Africa FASI


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:40:16 PM PST US
    From: "Brants" <tmbrant@usfamily.net>
    Subject: Re: horizontal stab dimensions
    Rick, If you look at the top "plan view" drawing of the 172 3/8" fuse (I'll call it Fuselage C), it shows 19 3/8" from the back of the vertical brace (same place as a horizontal brace?) to the tailpost. Then in the layout below which shows the turtledeck, it shows 18 7/8" from back of turtledeck to the tailpost.. I nailed a 1/8" piece of ply to the back of the brace (19 3/8") to which my turtledeck stringers are mounted. So in theory, the dimension in mine from turtledeck to tailpost is 19 1/4" I don't know how they came up with 18 7/8" unless I hosed something up, which is entirely possible. Tom B. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick Holland To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:19 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions Tom My long (172 3/8) fuselage plans (Supplementary Plans) shows the distance from the tailpost to the back of the turtledeck 18 7/8" not 19 3/8". Thats only a 7/8" difference. Still makes you wonder if you should build the stab 18" or 18 7/8" wide. Rick H Alex Sloan wrote: Chris, I am building the long fuselage and would appreciate the information you worked up on larger stabs. Thanks Alex Sloan alexms@bellsouth.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Brants To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 9:51 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions Chris, I am the one that asked the original question.... You're correct in saying that the drawings stand alone, however if I'd been smart I could have figured on making a larger stabilizer... According to your comments (if I interpreted correctly) the 172 3/8" fuse (this is what I have) requires a larger stabilizer (and elevator??)... My previous post asks this question - can I use the 18" stab (and elevator) now that they're built, or do I need to modify or rebuild? I would be interested in getting a copy of your article on this. Thanks, Tom Brant Brooklyn Park, MN ----- Original Message ----- From: Christian Bobka To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 8:44 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions Walt, You are concerned with a concept called tail volume. Tail volume is the square inch area of the horizontal surface (elevator and satbilizer together) times the distance in inches from the center of pressure of the horizontal stabilizer to the Center of Gravity, this being the point of rotation about which the aircraft moves based on input of the controls. As there are three wood fuselages that I know of, namely the version in the F&G manual and on the Hoopman drawings at 161 inches, the 1933 "Improved Aircamper" at 163 inches, and the fuselage designed for the Corvair at 172.375 inches, I am not sure which one you mean. I always called the Corvair fuselage the Pavliga long fuselage because, well, it is the longest and it is the fuselage used on Sky Gypsy. Anyway, if you take the square inch area of each horizontal design times the distance in inches from the loaded CG to the 33% chord point on each stabilizer design, you will come up with the tail volume...volume because the units will now be cubic inches. The hardest thing will be to figure out your loaded CG. If you make the distance between the CG to the CP of the stabilizer longer, you can get by with a smaller stabilizer area. Shorten up the CG to CP distance and you need to increase the tail area. My analysis of the different fuselages leads me to believe that using the 172.375 fuselage moves the seats back faster than the tail gets longer so it actually puts the CG further aft than on the shorter fuselages. This means that the CG to Cp of the stabilizer is actually a shorter distance so a bigger area stabilizer is needed. Unfortunately, the 172.375" fuselage drawing is a stand alone. No landing gear was ever published for it and neither is there a obviously a stabilizer. I wrote an article on gear placement on the 172.375 inch fuselage that was to be published in the Grant MacLaren published BPA NL but it never made it because the very issue it was to be published in was never published as he quit the post. I will dig it out. Only a hard copy exists, and even it is one of the drafts, so I will have to scan it to OCR software and see if I can post it. I hope this helps. I wish people said what inch fuselage they have when they talk of stuff like this as it really matters (or maybe it doesn't since they all seem to meet each aviator's expectations) Chris Bobka ----- Original Message ----- From: walt evans To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 7:04 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions I didn't know they were different. I built the long fuse and the tail was from the original prints, so I guess I got the wrong one. but flies great. What two prints show different tails??? walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Brants To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:37 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions I built the long fuselage and then (idiodically) built the horiz. stab for the short fuse (18" wide instead of 19 3/8") - didn't realize until today when I tried fitting it up. Question: can I glue a wider leading edge to the horizontal stab to make up the difference? Obviously this would add a bit of weight to the tail section.. Or could I just fill in behind the turtle deck to take up the space? Difference is about 1 3/8". Is the 1 3/8" width going to be missed if I leave it out? Does this cause a problem getting away from the 'airfoil shape'? Another related question: does the horiz. stab get bolted through the longerons? Any help on this would be appreciated. Tom Brant Brooklyn Park, MN


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:00:21 PM PST US
    From: "Graham Hansen" <grhans@cable-lynx.net>
    Subject: Re: Ted's advice--and flaring too HIGH
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Graham Hansen" <grhans@cable-lynx.net> Another tip: If landing on a runway with a crop on either side, you will experience a tendency to round out and flare too high. I've been there and done that! The tops of the plants will give you a false reference and if you don't compensate for it, you will "drop 'er on". This effect is more apparent if the vegetation is tall and the runway is narrow. In the flare one has to look to the side of the nose to judge height, and a tall crop nearby makes this difficult. A little bit of power enables the pilot to "feel" for the ground under these conditions. I find that my landings improve once the harvest is finished. Cheers, Graham Hansen (Pietenpol CF-AUN)


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:39:49 PM PST US
    From: "Christian Bobka" <bobka@compuserve.com>
    Subject: Re: horizontal stab dimensions
    Re: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensionsUse a piece of light spruce to fair the gap. Under the fabric, you won't notice. Chris Bobka ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:02 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: horizontal stab dimensions Rick, If it really bothers a builder to have to build a cover for the gap, it might be cheaper to build the turtle deck longer. I don't think anyone has ever complained that a properly configured Piet has insufficient horizontal stabilizer area, though it is well documented that large, covered, wheels make it want some more vertical stabilizer. You probably can't hurt the design by enlarging the horizontal stab area, but be sure to keep the front flying wires the same distance from the leading edge. Tail flutter hasn't historically been a problem but, considering how limber the thin stab is, you don't want to be the first to flutter test it. Mike Hardaway on 1/20/04 11:19, Rick Holland at at7000ft@speedtrail.net wrote: Tom My long (172 3/8) fuselage plans (Supplementary Plans) shows the distance from the tailpost to the back of the turtledeck 18 7/8" not 19 3/8". Thats only a 7/8" difference. Still makes you wonder if you should build the stab 18" or 18 7/8" wide. Rick H




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --