Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:44 AM - Fw: left coast piets (Clif Dawson)
     2. 04:00 AM - Re: A-65 (harvey.rule@bell.ca)
     3. 04:18 AM - Re: Gas tank size (Phillips, Jack)
     4. 04:29 AM - Re: First Flights (Phillips, Jack)
     5. 05:09 AM - Re: Gas tank size (owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com)
     6. 05:36 AM - Re: Gas tank size (hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com)
     7. 05:42 AM - Re: Gas tank size (Phillips, Jack)
     8. 05:48 AM - Re: Gas tank size (Michael D Cuy)
     9. 05:50 AM - Re: First Flights (Rick Holland)
    10. 05:52 AM - Re: Gas tank size (harvey.rule@bell.ca)
    11. 06:11 AM - Re: Gas tank size (Egan, John)
    12. 06:48 AM - Re: First Flights (hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com)
    13. 07:53 AM - hard seat (Dick Navratil)
    14. 08:06 AM - Re: Gas tank size Gas transfer. (Gary Gower)
    15. 08:32 AM - Re: First Flights (Bill Church)
    16. 08:49 AM - Re: Gas tank size Gas transfer. (harvey.rule@bell.ca)
    17. 09:19 AM - Re: First Flights (hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com)
    18. 10:04 AM - Re: First Flights (Bill Church)
    19. 10:16 AM - Re: First Flights (owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com)
    20. 03:10 PM - Re: Re: Gas tank size Gas transfer. ()
    21. 06:20 PM - Re: Re: Gas tank size Gas transfer. (Gary Gower)
    22. 06:20 PM - Hans new web site (Michael Turrell)
    23. 06:34 PM - Re: Hans new web site (HVandervoo@aol.com)
    24. 06:48 PM - Thanks Hans (Michael Turrell)
    25. 07:43 PM - fixed landing gear (Dick Navratil)
    26. 10:40 PM - Re: First Flights (Clif Dawson)
    27. 11:19 PM - Re: Re: Gas tank size Gas transfer. (Clif Dawson)
    28. 11:47 PM - Re: Re: Gas tank size Gas transfer. (Clif Dawson)
    29. 11:53 PM - Re: Re: Gas tank size Gas transfer. (Gary Gower)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | left coast piets | 
      
      
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Clif Dawson
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: left coast piets
      
      
      They're all on Vancouver Island. :-)
      
      The oldest continuously registered aircraft in Canada, CF-AOG,
      is flying off a private strip, one is flying out of Naniamo and the
      other is completed and in flight testing, again, at Naniamo.
      
      I almost forgot! It appears Dave Rowe has been posted to
      the far Atlantic Coast somewhere. I don't know the status of
      both his planes but some time ago they were under tarps
      in the corner of a hanger at Pat Bay ( Victoria International ).
      
      The attached photo is the one currently testing, built by Dean Sevold.
      Powered by a Ford "B"
      
      Clif
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: DONALD COOLEY
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 10:38 PM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: gap seals
      
      
        Hello Group,
             I was wondering.....how about using piano hinges for elevators?  The only
      real drawback I can see is that it wouldn't look "authentic".  Maybe function
      dictates form?  I plan using piano hinges for the ailerons, so this seems not
      too out of line.  Comments?
             BTW, I just returned from the NWAAC Fly-in at McMinnville, Oregon.  There
      was not a single Piet at this fairly prestigious event.  Mine is still probably
      several years from attending.  Will it be the first?  Where are all the Left
      Coast Piets?  The world awaits an answer!
             Keep the sawdust flyin'!    Don Cooley
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Don't wory ,Texan's get their fair share of snow and rotten weather from
      what I've seen.It just doesn't last as long.
      
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      Christian Bobka
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: A-65
      
      
      I am sure glad to live up nawth where it is a cool 75.
      
      
      Chris
      
      Braumeister und Inspektor der Flitzer und Flitzermotoren
      
              ----- Original Message -----
      
              From: Isablcorky@aol.com
      
              To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      
              Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 2:32 PM
      
              Subject: Pietenpol-List: A-65
      
              
      
              Pieters,
      
              Thanks for all the helpful comments. I used most of them.
      
              This morning before it reached 90 my man was proping after we
      had primed each cyl through the top plugs. He pulled it through about 4
      times and nothing. On the next prop I moved the throttle to about 1/3
      open. She fired. I had an oil pressure guage fitted next to the case.
      Oil pressure began to show after 20 or so seconds finally up to 30 @
      1200 rpm. I would reduce the throttle below 1000 and it would begin to
      stop so  kept it at 1200 for about 5 minutes but each time I lowered it
      below 1000 it tried to die. Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
      
              something tells me that I must have a problem in the idle system
      somewhere. But where?
      
              I had taken the carb apart several times to clean and check
      everything according to the manuals EXCEPT that little brass tube
      sticking up out of the lower body. I have another old carb body so I put
      that little tube in the vise and carefully turned the body until it
      loosened. I removed and examined. Studying the manual this was the idle
      metering tube. The lower end being the idle metering jet. It was blocked
      with no light to be seen through it. With some brass safety wire I began
      to clean and sure enough there was a jet hole there.
      
              I removed the carb on the engine, took it apart again and
      removed the idle metering tube and guess what I found. Yep, no hole and
      it took quite awhile to finally clean the gook out. It's clean now and
      all reassembled. When my prop-er comes back we will see if it works.
      
              Sorry this has been so drawn out but I wanted it in the archives
      in case someone in the future is faced with identical problems.
      
              Had to stop as the temp just jumped to 100 and as we say down
      here, you talk about, man it's hot.
      
              Corky
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinal.com>
      
      You always have the option to keep the tank less than full.  With a
      smaller tank you don't have the option to carry more fuel.  With a
      Pietenpol's limited ability to battle headwinds, I would think anything
      less than 3 hours of fuel capacity is pretty limiting.  I find that a
      leg longer than 2 hours is pretty uncomfortable, but it is nice to be
      able to handle a 3 hour leg if necessary.
      
      Jack
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Egan, John" <jegan@kcc.com>
      
      As I approach the completion of my wings (wooden completion), I will
      next work on the center section.  I recall some Pieters recommending to
      build the center section 36" wide to accommodate a larger fuel tank.  I
      thought I heard that a 36" section will hold about 14 gallons, which
      makes sense (25" x26" x 5" x 0.0043 = 13.975 gallons).  At 6.25 lbs per
      gallon, that's 87 pounds of fuel.  Is 87 pounds of fuel a lot for a
      Pietenpol to lift with a couple a people in it?  Let's assume a Corvair
      engine, extended fuselage, limited avionics, and let's assume 90% of the
      flying time carries only one person in the plane (for those who enjoy to
      compromise).  Any thoughts, or better yet, experience?
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      I would consider a Tailwind if I were building a 2 place travelling
      airplane.  I admire Wittman's designs from a functionality standpoint.
      I don't think his designs are particularly pretty, but they certainly
      are efficient.  But I want a 4 place plane that is fast with good short
      field characteristics.  I am considering an RV-10, a Murphy Moose, and a
      Bearhawk.  So far, the RV-10 looks like it has the most bang for the
      buck.
      
      
      Ran across a deal on an RV-4 yesterday, but I don't think I can swing
      the cash for the deal without selling the Pietenpol which I refuse to
      even consider.
      
      
      Jack
      
      
              -----Original Message-----
      =09
      =09
      
      Jack and all,
      
      Have you considered a Wittman Tailwind W10 ?  Did you also notice that
      one of them won First Place 'Formula FX'  race this year at Osh, beating
      out all similar horsepower  RV's, canards, and other glass planes, with
      an average speed of 218 mph ?  Yeah, I know it's a two place, but it is
      a scratch built plane, well under half the price of an RV, and it sure
      is FAAAAAST !! 
      
      Not that I'm prejudiced or anything, but a Wittman W10 is my current
      project.
      
      
      Chuck Gantzer
      
      NX770CG
      
      looking forward to passing up all those RV's when the Tailwind is done
      !!
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: harvey.rule@bell.ca
      
      I won't be using the front seat at any time for passengers so I can
      always drop a tank of gas in that area provided I tie her down well.I
      guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I could take
      as much gas as a passenger would weigh.Always an option.
      
      -----Original Message-----
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      Phillips, Jack
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack"
      <Jack.Phillips@cardinal.com>
      
      You always have the option to keep the tank less than full.  With a
      smaller tank you don't have the option to carry more fuel.  With a
      Pietenpol's limited ability to battle headwinds, I would think anything
      less than 3 hours of fuel capacity is pretty limiting.  I find that a
      leg longer than 2 hours is pretty uncomfortable, but it is nice to be
      able to handle a 3 hour leg if necessary.
      
      Jack
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Egan, John" <jegan@kcc.com>
      
      As I approach the completion of my wings (wooden completion), I will
      next work on the center section.  I recall some Pieters recommending to
      build the center section 36" wide to accommodate a larger fuel tank.  I
      thought I heard that a 36" section will hold about 14 gallons, which
      makes sense (25" x26" x 5" x 0.0043 = 13.975 gallons).  At 6.25 lbs per
      gallon, that's 87 pounds of fuel.  Is 87 pounds of fuel a lot for a
      Pietenpol to lift with a couple a people in it?  Let's assume a Corvair
      engine, extended fuselage, limited avionics, and let's assume 90% of the
      flying time carries only one person in the plane (for those who enjoy to
      compromise).  Any thoughts, or better yet, experience?
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Gas tank size | 
       27, 2005) at 08/25/2005 08:35:47 AM
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com
      
      John,
      
      I use standard center section, 3 piece wing.
      And made a aluminum fuel tank that holds 14 gallon plus I have a 2 gallon
      Header tank in the front.
      
      The Corvair, according to WW conversion manual, should burn 3.5 GPH.
      That gives a long range for a Pietenpol.
      
      I have been test flying my Piet every evening since Saturday and 45 minutes
      is a long time on a wooden bench.
      You will need a good seat cushion to get use out of a larger fuel tank.
      
      Hans
      
      
                                                                                 
                   "Egan, John"                                                  
                   <jegan@kcc.com>                                               
                   Sent by:                                                   To 
                   owner-pietenpol-l         pietenpol-list@matronics.com        
                   ist-server@matron                                          cc 
                   ics.com                                                       
                                                                         Subject 
                                             Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size       
                   08/24/2005 04:05                                              
                   PM                                                            
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                   Please respond to                                             
                   pietenpol-list@ma                                             
                      tronics.com                                                
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Egan, John" <jegan@kcc.com>
      
      As I approach the completion of my wings (wooden completion), I will
      next work on the center section.  I recall some Pieters recommending to
      build the center section 36" wide to accommodate a larger fuel tank.  I
      thought I heard that a 36" section will hold about 14 gallons, which
      makes sense (25" x26" x 5" x 0.0043 = 13.975 gallons).  At 6.25 lbs per
      gallon, that's 87 pounds of fuel.  Is 87 pounds of fuel a lot for a
      Pietenpol to lift with a couple a people in it?  Let's assume a Corvair
      engine, extended fuselage, limited avionics, and let's assume 90% of the
      flying time carries only one person in the plane (for those who enjoy to
      compromise).  Any thoughts, or better yet, experience?
      
      
      This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
      contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt
      from disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in error,
      please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and
      destroy any printed copy.   Thank you.
      ==============================================================================
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinal.com>
      
      I did that when flying my J-3 Cub across west Texas many years ago.
      Still not as useful as having a bigger fuel tank, because you've got to
      land to transfer the fuel from the gas can to your tank.  At one point
      on that trip I landed on a highway and taxied in to a service station
      and filled both my nose tank and my gas can right from an automobile gas
      pump.  Caused quite a commotion amongst the 7 people living in that
      town.
      
      Do Not Archive
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list- Pietenpol-List message posted by:
      harvey.rule@bell.ca
      
      I won't be using the front seat at any time for passengers so I can
      always drop a tank of gas in that area provided I tie her down well.I
      guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I could take
      as much gas as a passenger would weigh.Always an option.
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Michael D Cuy <Michael.D.Cuy@grc.nasa.gov>
      
      I agree with Jack P. that you can always off load fuel if you want to take
      a passenger on a warmer day or get out of a shorter strip, but should you
      land on a x-country like I did coming back from Brodhead (remember Bryan, 
      Ohio Jack ?)
      on a Sunday and find there is nobody around to help you with fuel---you can 
      always soldier
      on to the next airport.   I do like the automated pumps at my home airport.
      
      Mike C.
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flights | 
      
      Congratulations Hans, finishing in only a year and a half (including
      building your Corvair) is incredible. I am also building a long fuselage
      Corvair Piet, (Matco wheels and brakes also) one question, did you extend
      the front of your fuselage or engine mounts to get the CG to the point where
      you didn't have to move your wing back? (vertical cabanes?)
      
      Rick H.
      
      >
      >
      > Thank you All,
      >
      > I will have to repay the favor by sharing my experience in the future.
      >
      > I will start with this;
      > My Pietenpol is the improved long fuselage Air Camper.
      > Empty weight 680 Lbs
      > Split Landing gear with 6 x 6.00 wheels, Matco wheels and brakes
      > The main deviations from plans are:
      > 1) Wheels are 3" forward of plans. (changed the landing gear "V" slightly)
      > 2) Bungies replaced with coil springs.
      > 3) Engine mount extended by =BD" to give Corvair more clearance to Firewall.
      >
      > Engine O-164 Corvair, William Wynne conversion with front starter
      > Propeller: Tennessee prop. 64 x 34
      > Carburetor: Zenith 1821
      >
      > I started this Pietenpol project in March of 2004 and build a "little"
      > every day.
      > I took me around 1780 Hours to complete it, (yes, that's right in a year
      > and a half and holding a day job)
      >
      > Now it's off to flying again, Yee-Haw!!
      >
      > Hans van der Voort
      > Proud Owner/Builder/flyer of Pietenpol NX 15 KV "Miss Banshee"
      > Waller, 3XS7 Houston Sectional
      >
      >
      
      
      >
      >
      
      
      --
      Rick Holland
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: harvey.rule@bell.ca
      
      HAHAHA!I can well imagine it would cause a commotion.I've seen
      ultralight pilots do the same thing.What some guys do is hook up a small
      pump to thar spare tank and with the flick of a switch they pump gas
      from there to the main tank.It does require carrying a battery sourse
      though in order to run the small pump.The whole thing isn't exactly the
      safest way to fly but it works. 
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      Phillips, Jack
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack"
      <Jack.Phillips@cardinal.com>
      
      I did that when flying my J-3 Cub across west Texas many years ago.
      Still not as useful as having a bigger fuel tank, because you've got to
      land to transfer the fuel from the gas can to your tank.  At one point
      on that trip I landed on a highway and taxied in to a service station
      and filled both my nose tank and my gas can right from an automobile gas
      pump.  Caused quite a commotion amongst the 7 people living in that
      town.
      
      Do Not Archive
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list- Pietenpol-List message posted by:
      harvey.rule@bell.ca
      
      I won't be using the front seat at any time for passengers so I can
      always drop a tank of gas in that area provided I tie her down well.I
      guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I could take
      as much gas as a passenger would weigh.Always an option.
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Egan, John" <jegan@kcc.com>
      
      Thanks for the tank thoughts.  I'm building this plane without being a
      pilot yet, (have soloed), so I have very little experience on what a
      small plane can carry, and what duration a reasonable flight is in a
      Pietenpol.  All I know is that fuel is no good on the ground.    
      
      Do Not archive    
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      Phillips, Jack
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack"
      <Jack.Phillips@cardinal.com>
      
      I did that when flying my J-3 Cub across west Texas many years ago.
      Still not as useful as having a bigger fuel tank, because you've got to
      land to transfer the fuel from the gas can to your tank.  At one point
      on that trip I landed on a highway and taxied in to a service station
      and filled both my nose tank and my gas can right from an automobile gas
      pump.  Caused quite a commotion amongst the 7 people living in that
      town.
      
      Do Not Archive
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list- Pietenpol-List message posted by:
      harvey.rule@bell.ca
      
      I won't be using the front seat at any time for passengers so I can
      always drop a tank of gas in that area provided I tie her down well.I
      guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I could take
      as much gas as a passenger would weigh.Always an option.
      
      
      This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged,
      confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure
      under law.  If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly
      by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy.
       Thank you.
      ==============================================================================
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flights | 
       27, 2005) at 08/25/2005 09:47:44 AM
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com
      
      Thanks Rick,
      
      I have my Hangar behind my house (Airpark) which makes it very easy to work
      on the plane and keep a good pace.
      
      I did not extend the fuselage other than the 1/2 inch  on the motor mount.
      The reason for this was that the standard Corvair oil filter would almost
      hit the Firewall.
      And with a layer of Fiberfrax and stainless sheet would be impossible to
      mount.
      The other option would have been a remote oil filter but this would
      increase component count and weight.
      
      Or yet another option would have been to make a recess in the firewall but
      I was to far along to do that.
      If I build a Air Camper again I would build the Firewall 2" back and extend
      the Motor mount the same.
      
      My Cabanes are not vertical, they lean about 1 1/2" back.
      
      Please note, that with the above setup (CG at 18" from Leading Edge) and
      with Landing gear V as per drawing,
      I only had 1 Lbs on  my Tail wheel during W&B, top longeron level.
      
      I decided to move wheels forward by 3 " tail wheel pressure is now 15 Lbs.
      
      I did some wheel landings last night and it seems very stable.
      
      
      Hans
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      I don't remember who to credit for this.  At Broadhead, as I was complaining about
      my sore butt from the 4.7 hr trip down, somone commented that he used his
      sleeping bag pad as a cushion.  I tried this on the way home. 
      I have a self inflating pad and folded it over three times and left the valve up
      at the seat top.  I am able to let air out to get the right height.  This has
      made an extremely comfortable seat. These are available at Gander Mtn stores
      for about $80.  Also they have a cover available to hold this pad into the seat
      shape for $39.
      Dick N.
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Gas tank size  Gas transfer. | 
      
      Here we dont have enough airstrips here and is dificult to get gasoline on a XCountry
      flight (on ultralights),  legs of more than 4 hours are common among us
      (at 60-70 mph)  so we always fly with our extra gas tank in the passenger seat.
      
      What has worked great for us, is to make the extra tank airtight and pressurize
      with a cheap 2 quarts (ups! my english)  bottle to aply poison on the gardens
      :-)    Just give about 5 pumps and the gasoline will transfer.  No electricity
      needed.  Not much preassure either.
      
      Saludos
      Gary Gower.
      
      harvey.rule@bell.ca wrote: 
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: harvey.rule@bell.ca
      
      HAHAHA!I can well imagine it would cause a commotion.I've seen
      ultralight pilots do the same thing.What some guys do is hook up a small
      pump to thar spare tank and with the flick of a switch they pump gas
      from there to the main tank.It does require carrying a battery sourse
      though in order to run the small pump.The whole thing isn't exactly the
      safest way to fly but it works. 
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      Phillips, Jack
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack"
      
      
      I did that when flying my J-3 Cub across west Texas many years ago.
      Still not as useful as having a bigger fuel tank, because you've got to
      land to transfer the fuel from the gas can to your tank. At one point
      on that trip I landed on a highway and taxied in to a service station
      and filled both my nose tank and my gas can right from an automobile gas
      pump. Caused quite a commotion amongst the 7 people living in that
      town.
      
      Do Not Archive
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list- Pietenpol-List message posted by:
      harvey.rule@bell.ca
      
      I won't be using the front seat at any time for passengers so I can
      always drop a tank of gas in that area provided I tie her down well.I
      guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I could take
      as much gas as a passenger would weigh.Always an option.
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flights | 
      
      Lou and Hans,
      
      How about some pictures of your finished planes?
      
      
      Do Not Archive
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Gas tank size  Gas transfer. | 
      
      Wow these guys are smart!
      
      
      ________________________________
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gary
      Gower
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size Gas transfer.
      
      
      Here we dont have enough airstrips here and is dificult to get gasoline
      on a XCountry flight (on ultralights),  legs of more than 4 hours are
      common among us (at 60-70 mph)  so we always fly with our extra gas tank
      in the passenger seat.
      
      
      What has worked great for us, is to make the extra tank airtight and
      pressurize with a cheap 2 quarts (ups! my english)  bottle to aply
      poison on the gardens  :-)    Just give about 5 pumps and the gasoline
      will transfer.  No electricity needed.  Not much preassure either.
      
      Saludos
      
      Gary Gower.
      
      
      harvey.rule@bell.ca wrote:
      
              --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: harvey.rule@bell.ca
      =09
              HAHAHA!I can well imagine it would cause a commotion.I've seen
              ultralight pilots do the same thing.What some guys do is hook up
      a small
              pump to thar spare tank and with the flick of a switch they pump
      gas
              from there to the main tank.It does require carrying a battery
      sourse
              though in order to run the small pump.The whole thing isn't
      exactly the
              safest way to fly but it works.
      =09
              -----Original Message-----
              From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
              [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
              Phillips, Jack
              Sent: August 25, 2005 8:42 AM
              To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
              Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size
      =09
              --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack"
      =09
      =09
              I did that when flying my J-3 Cub acr oss west Texas many years
      ago.
              Still not as useful as having a bigger fuel tank, because you've
      got to
              land to transfer the fuel from the gas can to your tank. At one
      point
              on that trip I landed on a highway and taxied in to a service
      station
              and filled both my nose tank and my gas can right from an
      automobile gas
              pump. Caused quite a commotion amongst the 7 people living in
      that
              town.
      =09
              Do Not Archive
      =09
              Jack Phillips
      =09
              -----Original Message-----
              From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
              [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list- Pietenpol-List message posted by:
              harvey.rule@bell.ca
      =09
              I won't be using the front seat at any time for passengers so I
      can
              always drop a tank of gas in that area provided I tie her down
      well.I
              guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I
      could take
              as much gas as a passenger would weigh.Always an
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flights | 
       27, 2005) at 08/25/2005 12:18:43 PM
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com
      
      Bill,
      
      Started a web site yesterday
      
      www.hometown.aol.com/hvandervoo/indexfront.html
      
      Have a look !
      
      Hans
      
      
                                                                                 
                   "Bill Church"                                                 
                   <eng@canadianroge                                             
                   rs.com>                                                    To 
                   Sent by:                  <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>      
                   owner-pietenpol-l                                          cc 
                   ist-server@matron                                             
                   ics.com                                               Subject 
                                             Re: Pietenpol-List: First Flights   
                                                                                 
                   08/25/2005 10:23                                              
                   AM                                                            
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
                   Please respond to                                             
                   pietenpol-list@ma                                             
                      tronics.com                                                
                                                                                 
                                                                                 
      
      
      Lou and  Hans,
      
      How about some  pictures of your finished planes?
      
      
      Do Not  Archive
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Bill Church" <eng@canadianrogers.com>
      
      Looks really nice, Hans. I like the paint scheme.
      Congratulations!
      
      Bill
      
      Do not archive
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: First Flights
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com
      
      Bill,
      
      Started a web site yesterday
      
      www.hometown.aol.com/hvandervoo/indexfront.html
      
      Have a look !
      
      Hans
      
      
                                                 
      
      
                   Please respond to
      
                   pietenpol-list@ma
      
                      tronics.com
      
      
      Lou and  Hans,
      
      How about some  pictures of your finished planes?
      
      
      Do Not  Archive
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: harvey.rule@bell.ca
      
      A very sharp looking aircraft,nice going.Mine doesn't look that good.
      
      -----Original Message-----
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill
      Church
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: First Flights
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Bill Church"
      <eng@canadianrogers.com>
      
      Looks really nice, Hans. I like the paint scheme.
      Congratulations!
      
      Bill
      
      Do not archive
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: First Flights
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com
      
      Bill,
      
      Started a web site yesterday
      
      www.hometown.aol.com/hvandervoo/indexfront.html
      
      Have a look !
      
      Hans
      
      
                                                 
      
      
                   Please respond to
      
                   pietenpol-list@ma
      
                      tronics.com
      
      
      Lou and  Hans,
      
      How about some  pictures of your finished planes?
      
      
      Do Not  Archive
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Gas tank size  Gas transfer. | 
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: <sbobka@charter.net>
      
      good idea, Gary.
      
      Chris
      > 
      > From: Gary Gower <ggower_99@yahoo.com>
      > Date: 2005/08/25 Thu AM 11:06:23 EDT
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size  Gas transfer.
      > 
      > Here we dont have enough airstrips here and is dificult to get gasoline on a
      XCountry flight (on ultralights),  legs of more than 4 hours are common among
      us (at 60-70 mph)  so we always fly with our extra gas tank in the passenger seat.
      >  
      > What has worked great for us, is to make the extra tank airtight and pressurize
      with a cheap 2 quarts (ups! my english)  bottle to aply poison on the gardens
      :-)    Just give about 5 pumps and the gasoline will transfer.  No electricity
      needed.  Not much preassure either.
      > 
      > Saludos
      > Gary Gower.
      > 
      > harvey.rule@bell.ca wrote: 
      > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: harvey.rule@bell.ca
      > 
      > HAHAHA!I can well imagine it would cause a commotion.I've seen
      > ultralight pilots do the same thing.What some guys do is hook up a small
      > pump to thar spare tank and with the flick of a switch they pump gas
      > from there to the main tank.It does require carrying a battery sourse
      > though in order to run the small pump.The whole thing isn't exactly the
      > safest way to fly but it works. 
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      > Phillips, Jack
      > Sent: August 25, 2005 8:42 AM
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size
      > 
      > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack"
      > 
      > 
      > I did that when flying my J-3 Cub across west Texas many years ago.
      > Still not as useful as having a bigger fuel tank, because you've got to
      > land to transfer the fuel from the gas can to your tank. At one point
      > on that trip I landed on a highway and taxied in to a service station
      > and filled both my nose tank and my gas can right from an automobile gas
      > pump. Caused quite a commotion amongst the 7 people living in that
      > town.
      > 
      > Do Not Archive
      > 
      > Jack Phillips
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list- Pietenpol-List message posted by:
      > harvey.rule@bell.ca
      > 
      > I won't be using the front seat at any time for passengers so I can
      > always drop a tank of gas in that area provided I tie her down well.I
      > guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I could take
      > as much gas as a passenger would weigh.Always an option.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > __________________________________________________
      > 
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Gas tank size  Gas transfer. | 
      
      Yes, but what is the name (in english) of that plastic poisoner bottle?  Not important
      just that I think that has an specific name... Just curious...
      
      Saludos
      Gary Gower.
      
      
      sbobka@charter.net wrote:
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: 
      
      good idea, Gary.
      
      Chris
      > 
      > From: Gary Gower 
      > Date: 2005/08/25 Thu AM 11:06:23 EDT
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size Gas transfer.
      > 
      > Here we dont have enough airstrips here and is dificult to get gasoline on a
      XCountry flight (on ultralights), legs of more than 4 hours are common among us
      (at 60-70 mph) so we always fly with our extra gas tank in the passenger seat.
      > 
      > What has worked great for us, is to make the extra tank airtight and pressurize
      with a cheap 2 quarts (ups! my english) bottle to aply poison on the gardens
      :-) Just give about 5 pumps and the gasoline will transfer. No electricity needed.
      Not much preassure either.
      > 
      > Saludos
      > Gary Gower.
      > 
      > harvey.rule@bell.ca wrote: 
      > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: harvey.rule@bell.ca
      > 
      > HAHAHA!I can well imagine it would cause a commotion.I've seen
      > ultralight pilots do the same thing.What some guys do is hook up a small
      > pump to thar spare tank and with the flick of a switch they pump gas
      > from there to the main tank.It does require carrying a battery sourse
      > though in order to run the small pump.The whole thing isn't exactly the
      > safest way to fly but it works. 
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      > Phillips, Jack
      > Sent: August 25, 2005 8:42 AM
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size
      > 
      > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack"
      > 
      > 
      > I did that when flying my J-3 Cub across west Texas many years ago.
      > Still not as useful as having a bigger fuel tank, because you've got to
      > land to transfer the fuel from the gas can to your tank. At one point
      > on that trip I landed on a highway and taxied in to a service station
      > and filled both my nose tank and my gas can right from an automobile gas
      > pump. Caused quite a commotion amongst the 7 people living in that
      > town.
      > 
      > Do Not Archive
      > 
      > Jack Phillips
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list- Pietenpol-List message posted by:
      > harvey.rule@bell.ca
      > 
      > I won't be using the front seat at any time for passengers so I can
      > always drop a tank of gas in that area provided I tie her down well.I
      > guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I could take
      > as much gas as a passenger would weigh.Always an option.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > __________________________________________________
      > 
      
      
                      
      ---------------------------------
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Hans new web site | 
      
      I cannot get your new web site,using Explorer or Netscape.Tried google ,yahoo and
      a couple others with no luck.Any ideas what my problem is?Thanks as I would
      love to see the pics of your Piet.
      Kind Regards,Mike
      Do not archive
Message 23
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Hans new web site | 
      
      Try this link: _http://hometown.aol.com/hvandervoo/indexfront.html_ 
      (http://hometown.aol.com/hvandervoo/indexfront.html)  
      
Message 24
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      That worked. The paint scheme is absolutley knock dead gorgeous,as I read in the
      1932 Flying and glider Manual she looks "pretty hotsy totsy,congratulations.Mike
      Do not archive
Message 25
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | fixed landing gear | 
      
      I did an inspection of my plane tonight and found that my fixed gear axle is bent.
      There is about a 1" deflection in the axle,with the stbd wheel showing the
      bend.
       I had a bit of a discussion at Brodhead, with Jack Phillips on axle sizing and
      Jack, you are right, the 1 1/4" x .125 wall is not heavy enough for the fixed
      gear.  I have a spare axle of the same size and will install that but will also
      sleeve the inside with a 1" oak dowel.  I will then order a new 1 1/2" and
      install in down time this winter.  Also, one of my cross brace cables is showing
      the stress threads.  I just replaced the cables before Brodhead.  I will up
      size these cables to 5/32".
      I belive the axle bent last Saturday when I made a full stall landing in a 15-18
      kt cross wind.  I should have done a wheel landing, I guess. It wasn't a horrible
      touchdown but there were some pretty good side loads in settling in.  The
      Harley wheels held up very well though.
      This was one of those days when the wind was varied and gusting thru 50 degrees.
      
      Dick N.
Message 26
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flights | 
       <OF046A2EE9.A254080C-ON86257068.00593FA3-86257068.00599ADE@alfalaval.com>
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca>
      
      Very nice Hans.
      
      I've posted your website to the Corvair list. I think
      they will all be quite appreciative of your efforts.
      
      > www.hometown.aol.com/hvandervoo/indexfront.html
      > 
      > Have a look !
      > 
      > Hans
      > 
      
      
Message 27
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Gas tank size  Gas transfer. | 
      
      Garden sprayer is one name. They come in various sizes
      and are used for fertilizer, bug sprays and other things.
      
      If you're flying behind a Corvair you'll have a battery anyway.
      The electric pump won't take much to run.
      
      Let's see, the average official passenger wt here in Canada is now
      187 imperial pounds, 31 gallons!. That's going to be one calloused butt!
      And a lot of bug spray out the pilot tube! :-)
      
      
      Clif
      
        Yes, but what is the name (in english) of that plastic poisoner bottle?  Not
      important just that I think that has an specific name... Just curious...
      
        Saludos
        Gary Gower.
      
        > What has worked great for us, is to make the extra tank airtight and pressurize
      with a cheap 2 quarts (ups! my english) bottle to aply poison on the gardens
      :-) Just give about 5 pumps and the gasoline will transfer. No electricity
      needed. Not much preassure either.
        >
        > Saludos
        > Gary Gower.>
      
        > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: harvey.rule@bell.ca
        >
        > HAHAHA!I can well imagine it would cause a commotion.I've seen
        > ultralight pilots do the same thing.What some guys do is hook up a small
        > pump to thar spare tank and with the flick of a switch they pump gas
        > from there to the main tank.It does require carrying a battery sourse
        > though in order to run the small pump.The whole thing isn't exactly the
        > safest way to fly but it works.
      
        > > guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I could take
        > as much gas as a passenger would 
Message 28
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Gas tank size  Gas transfer. | 
      
      I don't think you need a specific poison pump bottle. Any air
      pump, such as used to inflate air mattresses and even a
      bicycle pump would work. You're pressurizing the sealed
      fuel tank and forcing the fuel out into the main tank.
      
      I like both this and the electric pump options. With the electric
      pump you could probably strap in a couple of 5 gal jerry cans
      with tubing securely fitted into them. This would give you two
      carryable, handled containers to go to a gas station with as well.
      
      Also here's a gap seal option from another RAA member;
      
      "The SeaRey guys use the 3M tape that protects the bottom rocker panels of cars
      from stone chips.
      Canadian Light Amphibians ,
      
      seareycanada.com
      
      I've seen it used as prop leading edge tape too."
      
      
      Clif
      
      
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Gary Gower
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 6:19 PM
        Subject: Re: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size Gas transfer.
      
      
        Yes, but what is the name (in english) of that plastic poisoner bottle?  Not
      important just that I think that has an specific name... Just curious...
      
        Saludos
        Gary Gower.
      
      
        sbobka@charter.net wrote:
          --> Pietenpol-List message posted by:
      
          good idea, Gary.
      
          Chris
          >
          > From: Gary Gower
          > Date: 2005/08/25 Thu AM 11:06:23 EDT
          > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
          > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gas tank size Gas transfer.
          >
          > Here we dont have enough airstrips here and is dificult to get gasoline on
      a XCountry flight (on ultralights), legs of more than 4 hours are common among
      us (at 60-70 mph) so we always fly with our extra gas tank in the passenger
      seat.
          >
          > What has worked great for us, is to make the extra tank airtight and pressurize
      with a cheap 2 quarts (ups! my english) bottle to aply poison on the gardens
      :-) Just give about 5 pumps and the gasoline will transfer. No electricity
      needed. Not much preassure either.
          >
          > Saludos
          > Gary Gower.> 
Message 29
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Gas tank size  Gas transfer. | 
      
      Thanks Cliff,  just learning,    We only uswd to carry about 2 hrs estimated of
      extra fuel, for safety.  Plus the normal 3 -4 hrs in the main tank.  Two stroke
      engines use lots of gas.
      
      Right now I fly with a 912S (Rotax), so no extra tank needed.  No, not a Piet,
      but a CH 701 by Zenith, that I co-own with my brother..
      
      Saludos
      Gary Gower
      
      Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca> wrote:
      Garden sprayer is one name. They come in various sizes
      and are used for fertilizer, bug sprays and other things.
      
      If you're flying behind a Corvair you'll have a battery anyway.
      The electric pump won't take much to run.
      
      Let's see, the average official passenger wt here in Canada is now
      187 imperial pounds, 31 gallons!. That's going to be one calloused butt!
      And a lot of bug spray out the pilot tube! :-)
      
      
      Clif
      
      Yes, but what is the name (in english) of that plastic poisoner bottle?  Not important
      just that I think that has an specific name... Just curious...
      
      Saludos
      Gary Gower.
      
      > What has worked great for us, is to make the extra tank airtight and pressurize
      with a cheap 2 quarts (ups! my english) bottle to aply poison on the gardens
      :-) Just give about 5 pumps and the gasoline will transfer. No electricity needed.
      Not much preassure either.
      > 
      > Saludos
      > Gary Gower.> 
      
      > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: harvey.rule@bell.ca
      > 
      > HAHAHA!I can well imagine it would cause a commotion.I've seen
      > ultralight pilots do the same thing.What some guys do is hook up a small
      > pump to thar spare tank and with the flick of a switch they pump gas
      > from there to the main tank.It does require carrying a battery sourse
      > though in order to run the small pump.The whole thing isn't exactly the
      > safest way to fly but it works. 
      
      > > guess since I'm not carrying passengers then theoretically I could take
      > as much gas as a passenger would 
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |