Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 09:31 AM - building video (Oscar Zuniga)
     2. 11:41 AM - Re: building video (RAMPEYBOY@aol.com)
     3. 11:49 AM - Re: Building Video (Waytogopiet@aol.com)
     4. 12:17 PM - Re: Building Video (Philip Miller)
     5. 12:36 PM - Re: Flying NX770CG - Video (Carl Vought)
     6. 12:59 PM - Re: Flying NX770CG - Video (DOUGLAS BLACKBURN)
     7. 02:02 PM - pesky elevator cable (Oscar Zuniga)
     8. 03:57 PM - building video (Oscar Zuniga)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      
      Chuck;
      
      Noble undertaking!  I wouldn't consider the following to be "errors" in the 
      plans, but they certainly have proven to need updating to make the plane 
      easier to understand how to build.
      
      1. Many have pointed out, Mike Cuy in his video especially, that many of the 
      fittings are dimensioned so close that the bolt tabs are too close to the 
      fabric or wood to allow the bolt and nut to be installed readily, much less 
      get a socket and wrench on them.  There isn't any exhaustive list of which 
      fittings this applies to, but generally speaking, anything with a mounting 
      tab protruding from a finished surface, could stand to have a bit of extra 
      length.
      
      2. Many, many of the clarification questions asked here have to do with 
      "what does 12 gauge fence wire convert to if I'm using 7x19 aircraft cable", 
      and the like.  Metal gauges, turnbuckle callouts, tension wire nomenclature, 
      and a few bits and pieces of old-time materials that are scarce or 
      unavailable, such as the streamline tubing that the plans call for.  It 
      isn't difficult to cross-reference to a newer material, but it could stand 
      some updating.
      
      3. Can anybody explain why the old Flying & Glider manuals show the plywood 
      seat back for the front cockpit, on the FRONT of the framing, while the 
      newer plans show it on the BACK?  41CC is built per plans, with the plywood 
      on the BACK of the framing (facing the rear cockpit) and I'm going to add a 
      cushion to that because it's uncomfortable for the passenger to lean against 
      the framing members.
      
      PS- I just started watching Chuck's "Flying NX770CG" video and it is a hoot! 
        Excellent!  I will say this, though... Chuck goes through the takeoff roll 
      over and over from several different camera angles and it makes it seem like 
      his airplane requires about 4000 ft. of grass to takeoff from ;o)  Every 
      Piet lover has to have this video!
      
      Oscar Zuniga
      San Antonio, TX
      mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com
      website at http://www.flysquirrel.net
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: building video | 
      
      In a message dated 12/18/2005 12:33:24 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
      taildrags@hotmail.com writes:
      
      PS- I  just started watching Chuck's "Flying NX770CG" video and it is a hoot! 
      
      Excellent!  I will say this, though... Chuck goes through the  takeoff roll 
      over and over from several different camera angles and it  makes it seem like 
      his airplane requires about 4000 ft. of grass to  takeoff from ;o)  Every 
      Piet lover has to have this  video!
      Where can we get a copy of this video?
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Building  Video | 
      
      In a message dated 12/17/2005 1:11:17 PM Central Standard Time, 
      Rcaprd@aol.com writes:
      There has NEVER been a set of plans, for ANY type of airplane, that does not 
      have errors in them, and in my humble opinion, I think the plans should NOT be
      
      changed. 
      Excellent comment....and presented, as you have with a solution to the 
      acknowledged problem.    Don Hicks 
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Building  Video | 
      
      Chuck,
      
      The plans have all the metal parts in gauge thicknesses.  Consulting the machinists
      equivalents, they seem to fall between the current available thicknesses
      of 4130.  Assuming that one would use 4130 aircraft steel for all those fittings,
      what is the rule of conversion?  Go to the next size up, down, or round to
      the nearest?  I can think of convincing arguments for any of them.
      Size up - safer, and 4130 is more brittle than cold rolled steel.
      Size down - The Pietenpol is an over-engineered plane.  BHP said as much in the
      Flying and Glider Manual.
      Round to the nearest - stays as close to plans as possible.
      
      I'd also like to see about pulleys.  The plans call for 2" pulleys for the controls,
      but AC 43.13 and Tony Bingelis would preach against such small sized pulleys.
      The loads shown for pulleys don't seem out of line.  Sizing up to larger
      pulleys would mean changing the angles for the brackets, especially the bracket
      that holds the pulleys that guide cable to the aileron horns.
      
      And about that pesky elevator cable - the one that seems to rub the top LE on every
      Piet I've seen; is there a solution that doesn't do that?  Can't you extend
      the bellcrank so that the cable exits in the fuse are high enough not to cause
      that rubbing?
      
      What about brakes?  I've seen hydraulic, mechanical disk, drum, and band brakes.
      No brakes in the plans, but that would hardly suffice on our modern ramp full
      of very expensive airplanes bordering narrow taxiways that you have to S-turn
      your way through.  And Tailwheels.  You can't have a skid.  And I've seen a
      lot of very different solutions for tailwheels. 
      
      The tube LG given on the plans are hardly ever used to my knowledge.  Why?  If
      you are going with tube gear, there seem to be much better configurations available.
      What are the trade-offs?
      
      Plank seats.  Lotsa folks complain about them.  Couldn't one make a frame of wood
      and sling a sheet of thin kevlar, impregnate it with fast epoxy, encase one's
      butt in a garbage bag smeared with parafin and just sit on it?  Not so good
      for the front seat, but it sure makes the pilot's life a lot more comfortable!
      
      And what about Wing LE covering.  The plans are somewhat non-specific.  I've seen
      Aluminum and plywood used.  I would imagine you could use some prepreg bendable
      composite too if you wanted light and strong. 
      
      The bellcrank bearing.  The plans don't give enough detail, or if they do, you
      wouldn't want to use bearings like that now.  Really Good bearing are now available
      and cheap.  What size?
      
      I would like to see the plans updated.  Not so much to correct errors, but to fulfill
      omissions, and make compliant to our modern rules and environment.  I'd
      like to have the LG angles and W&B solutions for more than the Ford Model A.
      Even the Corvair LG and W&B data on the plans is only good if you are using the
      blower on top - which nobody does any more - and the LG info is very imprecise.
      Variances will always occur.  What is needed is a best-practices approach
      to derive such information in a clear manner, set down in one place where the
      nomenclature, data reference points, and assumptions are consistent and spelled
      out.
      
      Michael Cuy's video mentions the need to extend the tabs.
      
      Perhaps I'm just nitpicking, but all of these things leave me scratching my head.
      Can I build something with this many unknowns?  My hats off to all of you
      who have.  And this list goes a long way to creating a place where the questions
      can be answered.   Without it, and all of you, I don't think I would attempt
      it.
      
          Phil Miller
          Altadena, CA
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flying  NX770CG  -  Video | 
      
      Hey Chuck....Yes, I want a copy of your video. Where can I send my check? Does
      $20 include shipping? That's a very reasonable price...Any plans for publishing
      it on DVD? You've made a very important contribution to Pietdom...Good work....Carl
      Vought
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Rcaprd@aol.com
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:18 AM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Flying NX770CG - Video
      
      
            First of all, I would like to thank the many folks who responded about the
      first video I made.  Your help was extremely valuable in the making of this
      final version.  This has been a HUGE project for me, but I'm glad I did it.  It's
      one of those things that seems like it's never done.
      
            I finally finished  'Flying NX770CG', (I'm close to finishing 'Building NX770CG').
      For those that have never seen a Pietenpol fly, or for those who have
      never been in one, this video is for you !!   I put the viewer in the Pilot
      seat to give the sight, sound, and feel of what it's like flying Low & Slow.
      
            It's 1hr 50min long, and here are some of the scenes:
        Engine start, taxi, and Detailed take off & landing sequences, with 8 or 9 camera
      angles.
        Some special effects.
        Lots of Smokin' scenes.
        Air to Air footage.
        Background music to accompany many scenes.
        Lots of Voice Over, explaining what's going on.
        In air video of Cutting the Toilet Paper, Windmills, Lakes, Hot Air Balloons,
      Chasing trains, pacing the shadow on the interstate.
        Some of my 3100 mile cross country flight in '04.
        River Run - down on the deck.
        Detailed landing sequence.
      
        $20
        e-mail me direct, if you are interested.
      
        Chuck G.
        NX770CG
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flying  NX770CG  -  Video | 
      
      Carl,
          A DVD is what you will get. That is what I received. Great fun to sit and watch
      after a hard day at the office/workplace!!!!!
      Doug Blackburn
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Carl Vought<mailto:carbarvo@knology.net>
      
        Any plans for publishing it on DVD?  
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | pesky elevator cable | 
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      
      Phil mentioned the matter of the elevator cables rubbing the leading edge of 
      the horizontal stabilizer, and that most Piets seem to have that condition.  
      Not John Dilatush's "Mountain Piet"!
      
      Check out the pictures at http://www.flysquirrel.net/piets/John_piet.html 
      (second picture from the bottom) and you'll find that engineer John studied 
      the geometries of the bellcranks, hinge points, and cables and built his 
      such that everything stays true as it goes about its "four-bar linkage" 
      motions.  This is one fix that should be easy to figure out for those with 
      the luxury of starting from scratch.  Myself, with retensioning the tail 
      rigging after the repairs to 41CC, I *almost* started to tension the lower 
      aileron cables to match the uppers, but quickly realized that I'd put the 
      controls in a bind when I pull the stick back if I did that.
      
      But they fly just fine with the setup 'per plans' and a section of clear 
      plastic tubing over the upper aileron cables where they contact the LE of 
      the HS to prevent scuffing the paint.
      
      Oscar Zuniga
      San Antonio, TX
      mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com
      website at http://www.flysquirrel.net
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      
      Well, as long as we're piling onto good old Chuck "Baby Oil" Gantzer with 
      things to think about for his building video, here's more good information.  
      Some is in the way of tips, some gives alternate ways to do the same thing, 
      some is clarification "British style".  It's from the UK Piet builders' 
      website, at http://www.pietenpolclub.co.uk/buildersnotes/fuznotes.htm .  On 
      that page if you scroll down to "Chris and Fran Barley's Fuselage Notes" 
      there is some good insight and clarification on some things.
      
      On a cold and rainy day you can spend quite a bit of time perusing the photo 
      gallery that the Brits have on their website.  Just go to their main page, 
      http://www.pietenpolclub.co.uk/default.htm , and click on 'Photo Gallery'.  
      For something really nifty, look closely at the image on Peter Hill's image 
      page (UK Projects) at 
      http://www.pietenpolclub.co.uk/gallery/displayimage.php?album=48&pos=1 to 
      see the tubing bracket that they used to install passenger cockpit shoulder 
      harnesses onto.  It conceals behind the pilot's instrument panel, doesn't 
      interfere with any of the cables, and provides a very secure shoulder strap 
      mounting.  There is a similar one on G-BYZY utilizing a single-point 
      shoulder harness; see image at 
      http://www.pietenpolclub.co.uk/gallery/displayimage.php?album=31&pos=6 or go 
      to the images of G-BYZY.
      
      Oscar Zuniga
      San Antonio, TX
      mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com
      website at http://www.flysquirrel.net
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |