Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Wed 06/14/06


Total Messages Posted: 26



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:27 AM - Re: aging eyesight aid (Clif Dawson)
     2. 05:34 AM - Re: aging eyesight aid (Hans Vander Voort)
     3. 05:38 AM - Re: aging eyesight aid ()
     4. 06:05 AM - Corvair update (Oscar Zuniga)
     5. 07:42 AM - Private airstrip for Piet. (Robison Family)
     6. 08:01 AM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Isablcorky@aol.com)
     7. 08:10 AM - Re: aging eyesight aid (Mark Blackwell)
     8. 08:18 AM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Phillips, Jack)
     9. 08:32 AM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. ()
    10. 08:33 AM - Re: aging eyesight aid ()
    11. 08:39 AM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Phillips, Jack)
    12. 09:07 AM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. ()
    13. 09:48 AM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Eric Williams)
    14. 09:55 AM - Re: Re: aging eyesight aid (GCARDINAL@mn.rr.com)
    15. 10:03 AM - max gross/was Private airstrip for Piet (Oscar Zuniga)
    16. 10:05 AM - Re: Re: aging eyesight aid ()
    17. 10:10 AM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Steve Ruse)
    18. 10:16 AM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. ()
    19. 03:42 PM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Rcaprd@aol.com)
    20. 03:51 PM - Re: aging eyesight aid (Rcaprd@aol.com)
    21. 03:54 PM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Rcaprd@aol.com)
    22. 03:59 PM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Rcaprd@aol.com)
    23. 08:49 PM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Scott L. Robison)
    24. 09:17 PM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (gcardinal)
    25. 10:29 PM - Re: Private airstrip for Piet. (Dick Navratil)
    26. 11:45 PM - Re: aging eyesight aid (Clif Dawson)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:27:14 AM PST US
    From: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: aging eyesight aid
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca> This is what you want Oscar; http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=45035&cat=1,43456,43351 Hell of a better price too! Clif Old guy eh? Is this you they're talking about? :-) Did you hear about the old guy that goes into the druggist to get Viagra and asked for it to be cut in four(each tablet).The druggist asked why and the guy sez I only need enough so I don't pee in my shoes > > Just saw this little idea in one of the magazines... it goes on the face > of your altimeter, directly over the Kollsman window, to magnify the > numbers for guys like me who need help reading things up close. Can't say > as I'd be willing to pay what they're asking though, because it looks like > you could easily get one of the little stick-on magnifiers to do the same > thing: > > http://www.onewinkllc.com/ >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:34:43 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: aging eyesight aid
    From: Hans Vander Voort <hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com>
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Hans Vander Voort <hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com> Cliff. The magnet holder would definitely give you much better Compass read-outs :-) Try a PDA magnifier, available at most office supply stores. or AS&S sells the "MAGNIFICO PLUS GPS MAGNIFIER 11-04378 (same thing) Hans Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw .ca> To Sent by: pietenpol-list@matronics.com owner-pietenpol-l cc ist-server@matron ics.com Subject Re: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid 06/14/2006 04:24 AM Please respond to pietenpol-list@ma tronics.com --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca> This is what you want Oscar; http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=45035&cat=1,43456,43351 Hell of a better price too! Clif Old guy eh? Is this you they're talking about? :-) Did you hear about the old guy that goes into the druggist to get Viagra and asked for it to be cut in four(each tablet).The druggist asked why and the guy sez I only need enough so I don't pee in my shoes > > Just saw this little idea in one of the magazines... it goes on the face > of your altimeter, directly over the Kollsman window, to magnify the > numbers for guys like me who need help reading things up close. Can't say > as I'd be willing to pay what they're asking though, because it looks like > you could easily get one of the little stick-on magnifiers to do the same > thing: > > http://www.onewinkllc.com/ >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:38:55 AM PST US
    Subject: aging eyesight aid
    From: <harvey.rule@bell.ca>
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> Geeze ,who uses compass's these days with the advent of GPS?;-) Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Hans Vander Voort Sent: June 14, 2006 8:32 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Hans Vander Voort <hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com> Cliff. The magnet holder would definitely give you much better Compass read-outs :-) Try a PDA magnifier, available at most office supply stores. or AS&S sells the "MAGNIFICO PLUS GPS MAGNIFIER 11-04378 (same thing) Hans Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw .ca> To Sent by: pietenpol-list@matronics.com owner-pietenpol-l cc ist-server@matron ics.com Subject Re: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid 06/14/2006 04:24 AM Please respond to pietenpol-list@ma tronics.com --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca> This is what you want Oscar; http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=45035&cat=1,43456,43351 Hell of a better price too! Clif Old guy eh? Is this you they're talking about? :-) Did you hear about the old guy that goes into the druggist to get Viagra and asked for it to be cut in four(each tablet).The druggist asked why and the guy sez I only need enough so I don't pee in my shoes > > Just saw this little idea in one of the magazines... it goes on the face > of your altimeter, directly over the Kollsman window, to magnify the > numbers for guys like me who need help reading things up close. Can't say > as I'd be willing to pay what they're asking though, because it looks like > you could easily get one of the little stick-on magnifiers to do the same > thing: > > http://www.onewinkllc.com/ >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:05:30 AM PST US
    From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Corvair update
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com> This has probably already been noted, but William Wynne has updated his website with several items. One, at http://www.flycorvair.com/hangar.html , explains how he is trying to streamline his operation and provide better phone service and includes a photo and tribute to John Monday at the bottom of the update. Another is a report on a completed and flying Corvair Pietenpol, at http://www.flycorvair.com/hangar0506.html . Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:28 AM PST US
    From: "Robison Family" <robisonfamily@consolidated.net>
    Subject: Private airstrip for Piet.
    I've just purchased land that measures 924' X 236'. Do you guys thinnk that this will be long enough for a runway if the approach is unobstructed? I'd like to use a C75 or C85 for power on my Piet. Thoughts suggestions? We are about 100' above sea level. Thanks, Scott Robison Central Illinois


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:01:50 AM PST US
    From: Isablcorky@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Private airstrip for Piet.
    With practice, you should be able to set it down on a normal power off landing and have 4 or 5 hundred feet remaining. Using a powered approach you should set it in and have 800 feet remaining.


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:10:41 AM PST US
    From: "Mark Blackwell" <markb1958@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: aging eyesight aid
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Mark Blackwell" <markb1958@verizon.net> ----- Original Message ----- From: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:38 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> > > Geeze ,who uses compass's these days with the advent of GPS?;-) > Do not archive Those with dead batteries.


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:18:03 AM PST US
    Subject: Private airstrip for Piet.
    From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinal.com>
    If the approaches are truly unobstructed (no obstructions over about 10' tall), you should be able to operate from a strip of that size safely. My Piet is heavy (745 lbs empty) and it regularly can get off the ground in under 500' with no wind. Then it chugs along, climbing at between 0 and 400 fpm, depending on load and temperature (density altitude). At high loads and high density altitudes, its climb ranges from non-existent to pitiful. I will never forget the trip to Brodhead last year where I landed for fuel at a 4,000' paved runway in West Virginia and almost bought the farm on takeoff. Temperature was 91 F, density altitude was about 4000' and with full fuel and all the stuff I was carrying, I was at gross weight (1150 lbs). The runway was 4,000 feet long, with a 200 foot tall hill at the south end. Of course, the wind was from the south. I got off the ground in about 400 feet and climbed to about 20' (the upper edge of ground effect). It simply would not climb any higher and the hill was approaching fast. I was able to find a gap in the trees on the left side of the runway near the south end, and wove through the trees (whose tops were higher than I was) until I flew over a cliff above a large lake. I circled three laps around that lake before I got high enough to get over that hill and continue on my course. I did find much later that my ignition timing was wrong and I was only getting about 55 hp out of my A65 Continental. Since I tuned the engine up climb on a hot day has improved from non-existent to merely awful. Landing on a 900' strip should prove to be no problem. I regularly get mine down and stopped in under 500' Jack Phillips NX899JP "Icarus Plummet" -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robison Family Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:41 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. I've just purchased land that measures 924' X 236'. Do you guys thinnk that this will be long enough for a runway if the approach is unobstructed? I'd like to use a C75 or C85 for power on my Piet. Thoughts suggestions? We are about 100' above sea level. Thanks, Scott Robison Central Illinois Cardinal Health -- Working together. For life. (sm) _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N orsk - Portuguese - Svenska: www.cardinalhealth.com/legal/email


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:32:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Private airstrip for Piet.
    From: <harvey.rule@bell.ca>
    Correct me if I am wrong but isn't the max weight for a Piet supposed to be 1129lbs? ________________________________ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Phillips, Jack Sent: June 14, 2006 11:18 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. If the approaches are truly unobstructed (no obstructions over about 10' tall), you should be able to operate from a strip of that size safely. My Piet is heavy (745 lbs empty) and it regularly can get off the ground in under 500' with no wind. Then it chugs along, climbing at between 0 and 400 fpm, depending on load and temperature (density altitude). At high loads and high density altitudes, its climb ranges from non-existent to pitiful. I will never forget the trip to Brodhead last year where I landed for fuel at a 4,000' paved runway in West Virginia and almost bought the farm on takeoff. Temperature was 91 F, density altitude was about 4000' and with full fuel and all the stuff I was carrying, I was at gross weight (1150 lbs). The runway was 4,000 feet long, with a 200 foot tall hill at the south end. Of course, the wind was from the south. I got off the ground in about 400 feet and climbed to about 20' (the upper edge of ground effect). It simply would not climb any higher and the hill was approaching fast. I was able to find a gap in the trees on the left side of the runway near the south end, and wove through the trees (whose tops were higher than I was) until I flew over a cliff above a large lake. I circled three laps around that lake before I got high enough to get over that hill and continue on my course. I did find much later that my ignition timing was wrong and I was only getting about 55 hp out of my A65 Continental. Since I tuned the engine up climb on a hot day has improved from non-existent to merely awful. Landing on a 900' strip should prove to be no problem. I regularly get mine down and stopped in under 500' Jack Phillips NX899JP "Icarus Plummet" -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robison Family Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:41 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. I've just purchased land that measures 924' X 236'. Do you guys thinnk that this will be long enough for a runway if the approach is unobstructed? I'd like to use a C75 or C85 for power on my Piet. Thoughts suggestions? We are about 100' above sea level. Thanks, Scott Robison Central Illinois Cardinal Health -- Working together. For life. (sm) _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese - Svenska: www.cardinalhealth.com/legal/email


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:33:47 AM PST US
    Subject: aging eyesight aid
    From: <harvey.rule@bell.ca>
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> I always carry spares and it is a pant load of fun replacing them in flight!;-) Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Blackwell Sent: June 14, 2006 11:09 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Mark Blackwell" <markb1958@verizon.net> ----- Original Message ----- From: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:38 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> > > Geeze ,who uses compass's these days with the advent of GPS?;-) > Do not archive Those with dead batteries.


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:39:55 AM PST US
    Subject: Private airstrip for Piet.
    From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinal.com>
    Max weight is whatever the builder determines it to be. In my case, I have run a stress analysis on the main structure and determined that 1150 is a good number. On my data plate it says 1195, just so I'm not likely to get "busted" on a ramp check. Jack Raleigh, NC -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of harvey.rule@bell.ca Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:32 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. Correct me if I am wrong but isn't the max weight for a Piet supposed to be 1129lbs? _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Phillips, Jack Sent: June 14, 2006 11:18 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. If the approaches are truly unobstructed (no obstructions over about 10' tall), you should be able to operate from a strip of that size safely. My Piet is heavy (745 lbs empty) and it regularly can get off the ground in under 500' with no wind. Then it chugs along, climbing at between 0 and 400 fpm, depending on load and temperature (density altitude). At high loads and high density altitudes, its climb ranges from non-existent to pitiful. I will never forget the trip to Brodhead last year where I landed for fuel at a 4,000' paved runway in West Virginia and almost bought the farm on takeoff. Temperature was 91 F, density altitude was about 4000' and with full fuel and all the stuff I was carrying, I was at gross weight (1150 lbs). The runway was 4,000 feet long, with a 200 foot tall hill at the south end. Of course, the wind was from the south. I got off the ground in about 400 feet and climbed to about 20' (the upper edge of ground effect). It simply would not climb any higher and the hill was approaching fast. I was able to find a gap in the trees on the left side of the runway near the south end, and wove through the trees (whose tops were higher than I was) until I flew over a cliff above a large lake. I circled three laps around that lake before I got high enough to get over that hill and continue on my course. I did find much later that my ignition timing was wrong and I was only getting about 55 hp out of my A65 Continental. Since I tuned the engine up climb on a hot day has improved from non-existent to merely awful. Landing on a 900' strip should prove to be no problem. I regularly get mine down and stopped in under 500' Jack Phillips NX899JP "Icarus Plummet" -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robison Family Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:41 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. I've just purchased land that measures 924' X 236'. Do you guys thinnk that this will be long enough for a runway if the approach is unobstructed? I'd like to use a C75 or C85 for power on my Piet. Thoughts suggestions? We are about 100' above sea level. Thanks, Scott Robison Central Illinois Cardinal Health -- Working together. For life. (sm) _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese - Svenska: www.cardinalhealth.com/legal/email Cardinal Health -- Working together. For life. (sm) _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N orsk - Portuguese - Svenska: www.cardinalhealth.com/legal/email


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:07:09 AM PST US
    Subject: Private airstrip for Piet.
    From: <harvey.rule@bell.ca>
    Up here in Canada,I can register mine as an ultralight(basic) and as long as I'm under the max weight for an ultralight (1235,I think now) then they don't care what my plane max weight is.I don't even have that info on my plate.My empty weight is 777lbs but then I carry a battery and a starter as well as an 80hp Franklin motor.So I'm going to be heavier.The plans say I'm supposed to be 1129 max but then again I have Grega mods so who knows,I may be a max weight of 1200lbs.;-o ________________________________ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Phillips, Jack Sent: June 14, 2006 11:39 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. Max weight is whatever the builder determines it to be. In my case, I have run a stress analysis on the main structure and determined that 1150 is a good number. On my data plate it says 1195, just so I'm not likely to get "busted" on a ramp check. Jack Raleigh, NC -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of harvey.rule@bell.ca Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:32 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. Correct me if I am wrong but isn't the max weight for a Piet supposed to be 1129lbs? ________________________________ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Phillips, Jack Sent: June 14, 2006 11:18 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. If the approaches are truly unobstructed (no obstructions over about 10' tall), you should be able to operate from a strip of that size safely. My Piet is heavy (745 lbs empty) and it regularly can get off the ground in under 500' with no wind. Then it chugs along, climbing at between 0 and 400 fpm, depending on load and temperature (density altitude). At high loads and high density altitudes, its climb ranges from non-existent to pitiful. I will never forget the trip to Brodhead last year where I landed for fuel at a 4,000' paved runway in West Virginia and almost bought the farm on takeoff. Temperature was 91 F, density altitude was about 4000' and with full fuel and all the stuff I was carrying, I was at gross weight (1150 lbs). The runway was 4,000 feet long, with a 200 foot tall hill at the south end. Of course, the wind was from the south. I got off the ground in about 400 feet and climbed to about 20' (the upper edge of ground effect). It simply would not climb any higher and the hill was approaching fast. I was able to find a gap in the trees on the left side of the runway near the south end, and wove through the trees (whose tops were higher than I was) until I flew over a cliff above a large lake. I circled three laps around that lake before I got high enough to get over that hill and continue on my course. I did find much later that my ignition timing was wrong and I was only getting about 55 hp out of my A65 Continental. Since I tuned the engine up climb on a hot day has improved from non-existent to merely awful. Landing on a 900' strip should prove to be no problem. I regularly get mine down and stopped in under 500' Jack Phillips NX899JP "Icarus Plummet" -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robison Family Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:41 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. I've just purchased land that measures 924' X 236'. Do you guys thinnk that this will be long enough for a runway if the approach is unobstructed? I'd like to use a C75 or C85 for power on my Piet. Thoughts suggestions? We are about 100' above sea level. Thanks, Scott Robison Central Illinois Cardinal Health -- Working together. For life. (sm) _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese - Svenska: www.cardinalhealth.com/legal/email Cardinal Health -- Working together. For life. (sm) _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese - Svenska: www.cardinalhealth.com/legal/email


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:48:35 AM PST US
    From: "Eric Williams" <ewilliams805@msn.com>
    Subject: Private airstrip for Piet.
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Eric Williams" <ewilliams805@msn.com> Scott, Not to split hairs or anything but I grew up in Central Illinois and the elevations are more on the order of 600' above sea level. Not a real huge difference but I'm an engineer and we're kind of like that (ha ha). Also, you can eek out a little more length by orienting your strip diagonally on the parcel. It would give you 953' that way - probably not enough of an advantage to bisect the property like that. If you don't mind saying, where in central Illinois? I grew up in Lincoln, about 30 miles north of Springfield. Eric >From: "Robison Family" <robisonfamily@consolidated.net> >To: "Pietenpol-List Digest Server" <pietenpol-list@matronics.com> >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. >Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:40:37 -0500 > >I've just purchased land that measures 924' X 236'. Do you guys thinnk >that this will be long enough for a runway if the approach is unobstructed? >I'd like to use a C75 or C85 for power on my Piet. Thoughts suggestions? >We are about 100' above sea level. > >Thanks, > >Scott Robison >Central Illinois


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:55:23 AM PST US
    From: GCARDINAL@mn.rr.com
    Subject: Re: aging eyesight aid
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: GCARDINAL@mn.rr.com Who needs a GPS as long as water towers have names? ----- Original Message ----- From: harvey.rule@bell.ca Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> > > Geeze ,who uses compass's these days with the advent of GPS?;-) > Do not archive > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Hans > Vander Voort > Sent: June 14, 2006 8:32 AM > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid > > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Hans Vander Voort > <hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com> > > Cliff. > > The magnet holder would definitely give you much better Compass > read-outs > :-) > > Try a PDA magnifier, available at most office supply stores. > or AS&S sells the "MAGNIFICO PLUS GPS MAGNIFIER 11-04378 (same thing) > > > Hans > > > > > > > Clif Dawson > > <CDAWSON5854@shaw > > .ca> > To > Sent by: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > > owner-pietenpol-l > cc > ist-server@matron > > ics.com > Subject > Re: Pietenpol-List: aging > eyesight > aid > > 06/14/2006 04:24 > > AM > > > > > > Please respond to > > pietenpol-list@ma > > tronics.com > > > > > > > > > > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Clif Dawson > <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca> > This is what you want Oscar; > > http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=45035&cat=1,43456,43351 > > Hell of a better price too! > > Clif > > Old guy eh? Is this you they're talking about? :-) > > Did you hear about the old guy that goes into the druggist to get > Viagraand asked for it to be cut in four(each tablet).The druggist > asked why > and the guy sez I only need enough so I don't pee in my shoes > > > > > > > > Just saw this little idea in one of the magazines... it goes on the > face > > of your altimeter, directly over the Kollsman window, to magnify the > > numbers for guys like me who need help reading things up close. > Can'tsay > > as I'd be willing to pay what they're asking though, because it > lookslike > > you could easily get one of the little stick-on magnifiers to do the > same > > > thing: > > > > http://www.onewinkllc.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:03:44 AM PST US
    From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
    Subject: max gross/was Private airstrip for Piet
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com> Corky placarded and registered NX41CC with a max gross of 1,185 lbs. and I have run numerous "what-ifs" to see how I could load it out of gross while still in the CG envelope. As others have mentioned, you can load it and take off, but will it climb? I have yet to re-weigh the airplane after repairs but expect the empty weight to be quite close to the way Corky originally completed it. Balance will change a bit since I relocated the ELT to behind the pilot's seat and Corky also changed from a metal to a wood prop right before I bought the airplane from him. My uncle has 33 acres in the Texas hill country, including two connecting grass meadows with a fence between them. I've measured the two meadows and if the fence is removed, it's possible that I could get the Piet in and out of there. Alt. of 1,640MSL so on a typical summer day with 90F air temp and 68F dew point (common), standard pressure, it will be about 4200' density altitude and the engine will only develop about 85% power at best. Very scenic, runs along the Frio River in the hills, subject to the usual williwaws and gusts when the afternoon starts heating things up but with a good breeze up the meadow to land and takeoff into. Maybe someday I'll shoot a few approaches and see how it looks. A guy can dream?! Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:05:18 AM PST US
    Subject: aging eyesight aid
    From: <harvey.rule@bell.ca>
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> Funny you should say that.When I used to fly my Lazair I used to read road signs and water towers and pick out radio towers on the map.I used to have it strapped to a plac on my leg.Man those were the good old days! Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of GCARDINAL@mn.rr.com Sent: June 14, 2006 12:54 PM Subject: Re: RE: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: GCARDINAL@mn.rr.com Who needs a GPS as long as water towers have names? ----- Original Message ----- From: harvey.rule@bell.ca Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> > > Geeze ,who uses compass's these days with the advent of GPS?;-) > Do not archive > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Hans > Vander Voort > Sent: June 14, 2006 8:32 AM > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: aging eyesight aid > > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Hans Vander Voort > <hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com> > > Cliff. > > The magnet holder would definitely give you much better Compass > read-outs > :-) > > Try a PDA magnifier, available at most office supply stores. > or AS&S sells the "MAGNIFICO PLUS GPS MAGNIFIER 11-04378 (same thing) > > > Hans > > > > > > > Clif Dawson > > <CDAWSON5854@shaw > > .ca> > To > Sent by: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > > owner-pietenpol-l > cc > ist-server@matron > > ics.com > Subject > Re: Pietenpol-List: aging > eyesight > aid > > 06/14/2006 04:24 > > AM > > > > > > Please respond to > > pietenpol-list@ma > > tronics.com > > > > > > > > > > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Clif Dawson > <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca> > This is what you want Oscar; > > http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=45035&cat=1,43456,43351 > > Hell of a better price too! > > Clif > > Old guy eh? Is this you they're talking about? :-) > > Did you hear about the old guy that goes into the druggist to get > Viagraand asked for it to be cut in four(each tablet).The druggist > asked why > and the guy sez I only need enough so I don't pee in my shoes > > > > > > > > Just saw this little idea in one of the magazines... it goes on the > face > > of your altimeter, directly over the Kollsman window, to magnify the > > numbers for guys like me who need help reading things up close. > Can'tsay > > as I'd be willing to pay what they're asking though, because it > lookslike > > you could easily get one of the little stick-on magnifiers to do the > same > > > thing: > > > > http://www.onewinkllc.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:10:18 AM PST US
    From: Steve Ruse <steve@wotelectronics.com>
    Subject: Re: Private airstrip for Piet.
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Steve Ruse <steve@wotelectronics.com> I regularly fly out of a 2,100' grass strip at 1,100' above sea level. I've been into a 1,000' strip, and it wasn't a problem by myself. At that takeoff distance though (and sometimes even with a 2,100' runway), I'll never carry a passenger. Climb is just too slow...makes for an uncomfortable flight. My Piet is 600lbs empty, I weigh ~165lbs, and my wife is about 130lbs. In my plane with 100lbs of fuel, we're right at 1,000lbs. At that weight, 2,100' is about what I need to get over a 50' obstruction. Very sluggish in climb...all manuevers are made very, very gently. On a 60*F day, by myself, with a little headwind, I can get over a 50' obstruction in 600' or so. This is with an A-75 and cruise prop. Consider a no-electrics C-90 for your Piet...that is a very good power:weight ratio for the engine. Should make a good performer, and solo you would likely be fine on any Illinois day on a 900' strip with no obstructions. As for fuel consumption of the larger engine, you can always throttle it back to 55% power and burn as much as an A-65. Steve Ruse Norman, OK Quoting Robison Family <robisonfamily@consolidated.net>: > I've just purchased land that measures 924' X 236'. Do you guys > thinnk that this will be long enough for a runway if the approach is > unobstructed? I'd like to use a C75 or C85 for power on my Piet. > Thoughts suggestions? We are about 100' above sea level. > > Thanks, > > Scott Robison > Central Illinois


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:16:12 AM PST US
    Subject: Private airstrip for Piet.
    From: <harvey.rule@bell.ca>
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: <harvey.rule@bell.ca> I was talking to another Piet owner out of Carp during our Flyin last weekend and he mentioned that the elevator is constricted to 10degrees up elevator.I have no constriction on mine at all.It will come up to 45 degrees when pulled all the way.Should I have constriction on this or is it just personal preference? -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steve Ruse Sent: June 14, 2006 1:10 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Steve Ruse <steve@wotelectronics.com> I regularly fly out of a 2,100' grass strip at 1,100' above sea level. I've been into a 1,000' strip, and it wasn't a problem by myself. At that takeoff distance though (and sometimes even with a 2,100' runway), I'll never carry a passenger. Climb is just too slow...makes for an uncomfortable flight. My Piet is 600lbs empty, I weigh ~165lbs, and my wife is about 130lbs. In my plane with 100lbs of fuel, we're right at 1,000lbs. At that weight, 2,100' is about what I need to get over a 50' obstruction. Very sluggish in climb...all manuevers are made very, very gently. On a 60*F day, by myself, with a little headwind, I can get over a 50' obstruction in 600' or so. This is with an A-75 and cruise prop. Consider a no-electrics C-90 for your Piet...that is a very good power:weight ratio for the engine. Should make a good performer, and solo you would likely be fine on any Illinois day on a 900' strip with no obstructions. As for fuel consumption of the larger engine, you can always throttle it back to 55% power and burn as much as an A-65. Steve Ruse Norman, OK Quoting Robison Family <robisonfamily@consolidated.net>: > I've just purchased land that measures 924' X 236'. Do you guys > thinnk that this will be long enough for a runway if the approach is > unobstructed? I'd like to use a C75 or C85 for power on my Piet. > Thoughts suggestions? We are about 100' above sea level. > > Thanks, > > Scott Robison > Central Illinois


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:42:59 PM PST US
    From: Rcaprd@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Private airstrip for Piet.
    In a message dated 6/14/2006 9:45:17 AM Central Standard Time, robisonfamily@consolidated.net writes: I've just purchased land that measures 924' X 236'. Do you guys thinnk that this will be long enough for a runway if the approach is unobstructed? I'd like to use a C75 or C85 for power on my Piet. Thoughts suggestions? We are about 100' above sea level. Thanks, Scott Robison Central Illinois That's pretty short, but is certainly within performance limits. However, before you operate there, you Must have the experience to know how to handle the plane under these conditions. Chuck G. NX770CG


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:51:42 PM PST US
    From: Rcaprd@aol.com
    Subject: Re: aging eyesight aid
    In a message dated 6/14/2006 11:56:46 AM Central Standard Time, GCARDINAL@mn.rr.com writes: Who needs a GPS as long as water towers have names? I agree, but I was lost one time (GPS turned off, saving the only batteries) and spotted a water tower that was about 5 miles away. When I got there, it didn't have a name on it !! Chuck G. NX770CG


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:54:45 PM PST US
    From: Rcaprd@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Private airstrip for Piet.
    In a message dated 6/14/2006 10:38:01 AM Central Standard Time, harvey.rule@bell.ca writes: Correct me if I am wrong but isn=99t the max weight for a Piet suppose d to be 1129lbs? Bernard H. Pietenpol listed the gross weight at 1050 lbs. Chuck G. NX770CG


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:59:20 PM PST US
    From: Rcaprd@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Private airstrip for Piet.
    In a message dated 6/14/2006 12:17:30 PM Central Standard Time, harvey.rule@bell.ca writes: I was talking to another Piet owner out of Carp during our Flyin last weekend and he mentioned that the elevator is constricted to 10degrees up elevator.I have no constriction on mine at all.It will come up to 45 degrees when pulled all the way.Should I have constriction on this or is it just personal preference? Ten Degrees is not nearly enough up flipper (elevator). There is no way you would ever be able to do a full stall landing, or use it as aerodynamic braking. Chuck G. NX770CG


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:49:58 PM PST US
    Subject: RE: Private airstrip for Piet.
    From: "Scott L. Robison" <RobisonS@mattoonillinois.org>
    Eric, Sorry for the bad info. Yes, you are correct on the altitude. It's actually 720 to be exact. I had my head in the clouds and my wife in one ear when I was typing. Anyway, I'm from Charleston, Illinois and there are 5 Piets in this area under construction. Exciting stuff. See you at Broadhead. Scott


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:17:41 PM PST US
    From: "gcardinal" <gcardinal@mn.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Private airstrip for Piet.
    I agree with Chuck about 10 degrees being insufficient. NX18235 has no stops on the elevator. The DAR didn't have a problem with it. I'm finding that the elevator remains fully effective all the way through the flare and touchdown. The elevator / stabilizer gap is quite small which helps with elevator controllability. Dick Navratil can speak a little about sealing the elevator gap. Greg C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rcaprd@aol.com To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 5:58 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. In a message dated 6/14/2006 12:17:30 PM Central Standard Time, harvey.rule@bell.ca writes: I was talking to another Piet owner out of Carp during our Flyin last weekend and he mentioned that the elevator is constricted to 10degrees up elevator.I have no constriction on mine at all.It will come up to 45 degrees when pulled all the way.Should I have constriction on this or is it just personal preference? Ten Degrees is not nearly enough up flipper (elevator). There is no way you would ever be able to do a full stall landing, or use it as aerodynamic braking. Chuck G. NX770CG


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:29:30 PM PST US
    From: "Dick Navratil" <horzpool@goldengate.net>
    Subject: Re: Private airstrip for Piet.
    I agree with Chuck and Greg about the elevator travle. No stops are advisable there. Sealing the gaps definetly changes the performance drastically. Gets the tail up faster and increases airspeed approx 2 mph. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: gcardinal To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:17 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. I agree with Chuck about 10 degrees being insufficient. NX18235 has no stops on the elevator. The DAR didn't have a problem with it. I'm finding that the elevator remains fully effective all the way through the flare and touchdown. The elevator / stabilizer gap is quite small which helps with elevator controllability. Dick Navratil can speak a little about sealing the elevator gap. Greg C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rcaprd@aol.com To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 5:58 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Private airstrip for Piet. In a message dated 6/14/2006 12:17:30 PM Central Standard Time, harvey.rule@bell.ca writes: I was talking to another Piet owner out of Carp during our Flyin last weekend and he mentioned that the elevator is constricted to 10degrees up elevator.I have no constriction on mine at all.It will come up to 45 degrees when pulled all the way.Should I have constriction on this or is it just personal preference? Ten Degrees is not nearly enough up flipper (elevator). There is no way you would ever be able to do a full stall landing, or use it as aerodynamic braking. Chuck G. NX770CG


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:45:17 PM PST US
    From: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: aging eyesight aid
    --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca> I assumed one would take it off the base and stick it to the face. Right? :-) Clif > > The magnet holder would definitely give you much better Compass read-outs > :-) > > Hans




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --