Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:48 AM - CAD versus cardboard (Steve Glass)
     2. 05:16 AM - Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 29 Msgs - 01/05/07 (Bill Weir)
     3. 05:24 AM - Re: CAD versus cardboard[Scanned] (Rob Hart)
     4. 06:59 AM - Re: CAD versus cardboard (Amsafetyc@aol.com)
     5. 07:12 AM - Re: CAD versus cardboard (Bill Rayfield)
     6. 07:39 AM - Re: CAD versus cardboard (Robert Gow)
     7. 10:13 AM - Re: Securing plane and J3 eyebrows (Rick Holland)
     8. 05:53 PM - Re: CAD versus cardboard (HelsperSew@aol.com)
     9. 08:19 PM - Re: Tough love........ (shad bell)
    10. 10:43 PM - Re: Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 29 Msgs - 01/05/07 (Clif Dawson)
    11. 11:17 PM - Re: CAD versus cardboard (Johnwoods)
    12. 11:18 PM - Re: CAD versus cardboard (Glenn Thomas)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | CAD versus cardboard | 
      
      
      Hi
      
      I have been on the list for about a year gathering info but not yet started 
      building.
      
      It would be intersting to know the average age of the people on the list.  I 
      would guess around mid 50's.  Assuming that I would guess  only a portion 
      are up on Cad.  I'm 59
      
      CAD would be great for documenting patterns such as the eyebrow currently in 
      cardboard.  The eyebrow question will surface again in a year or so but the 
      patterns might not.  If we had a cad file they could be reproduced again and 
      again.  These files could live on the Matronics site to be accessed by all.
      
      I have seen mention of some of people putting the Piet into CAD perhaps 
      somebody would document the pieces that we all seem to need every once in a 
      while.  It will take some time but we could build a good library of 
      important bits.
      
      Interested to hear your thoughts.
      
      Steve in Maine
      
      _________________________________________________________________
      The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here.  Get all the scoop. 
      http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 29 Msgs - 01/05/07 | 
      
      
      Bob Gow,
      
      I didn't catch that it was a partially built Piet that you were considering 
      importing ino Canada. don't take this one to Transport Canada but lean on 
      you local MDRA inspector to inspect look inside the wings etc. with a video 
      camera on a stick. Acording to our local ispector he was able to make good 
      inspection as he watched the screen and I don't think they did, but it would 
      have been possible to record and save the images.
      
      Bill Weir
      >> Time: 07:43:19 AM PST US
      >> From: "Robert Gow" <rgow@avionicsdesign.ca>
      >> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Importing an unfinished homebuilt into Canada.
      >>
      >> I`m interested in Cart`s Pietenpol but there are some issues importing it
      >> to
      >> Canada.  My first contact with the inspectors here was not as good as I
      >> had
      >> hoped.  The tell me I'll need a pre-cover inspection if I want to import
      >> it
      >> and finish the project in Canada.   That means removing the fabric.  I do
      >> not want to rip the fabric off this airplane to get it inspected.
      >>
      >> Or, as a finished aircraft,  the aircraft must have a 100 hours on it
      >> before
      >> it can be imported.
      >>
      >> Does anyone have an idea how to avoid this?
      >>
      >> Perhaps I could complete it or have it completed as a US aircraft and fly
      >> it
      >> under US registry for the first 100 hours.  But can you register a US
      >> aircraft to a non-citizen/ non-resident?
      >>
      >> Or perhaps I can get the pre-cover inspection waived if there is evidence
      >> of
      >> an FAA pre-cover inspection.  Is there a precedent for this?
      >>
      >> Or I can look into ultra-light classification but I do not believe I 
      >> could
      >> carry a passenger which is not acceptable to me.
      >>
      >> Bob
      >
      .ca>
      >> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Importing an unfinished homebuilt into Canada.
      >>
      >> I`m interested in Cart`s Pietenpol but there are some issues importing it
      >> to
      >> Canada.  My first contact with the inspectors here was not as good as I
      >> had
      >> hoped.  The tell me I'll need a pre-cover inspection if I want to import
      >> it
      >> and finish the project in Canada.   That means removing the fabric.  I do
      >> not want to rip the fabric off this airplane to get it inspected.
      >>
      >> Or, as a finished aircraft,  the aircraft must have a 100 hours on it
      >> before
      >> it can be imported.
      >>
      >> Does anyone have an idea how to avoid this?
      >>
      >> Perhaps I could complete it or have it completed as a US aircraft and fly
      >> it
      >> under US registry for the first 100 hours.  But can you register a US
      >> aircraft to a non-citizen/ non-resident?
      >>
      >> Or perhaps I can get the pre-cover inspection waived if there is evidence
      >> of
      >> an FAA pre-cover inspection.  Is there a precedent for this?
      >>
      >> Or I can look into ultra-light classification but I do not believe I 
      >> could
      >> carry a passenger which is not acceptable to me.
      >>
      >> Bob
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | CAD versus cardboard[Scanned] | 
      
      
      Hi Steve
      
      39 years old, 3 kids (all 13 and under), and have been planning the Piet
      since 1992.  In my field (radiology), CAD = Computer Assisted Diagnosis.
      I suspect computer aided design might be more useful in present
      endeavours!  I am now around 50% through the mockup fuselage; still yet
      to order the timber for the real one.  Have set aside the next decade to
      finish the project, although this may be expedited by recent friendships
      with local builders (thanks Peter, John and Graham!).  "Low and slow"
      doesn't just apply to the aircraft!
      
      Best regards
      
      Rob & Co
      
      Perth, Western Australia.
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steve
      Glass
      Sent: Saturday, 6 January 2007 9:47 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: CAD versus cardboard[Scanned]
      
      <redsglass@hotmail.com>
      
      Hi
      
      I have been on the list for about a year gathering info but not yet
      started 
      building.
      
      It would be intersting to know the average age of the people on the
      list.  I 
      would guess around mid 50's.  Assuming that I would guess  only a
      portion 
      are up on Cad.  I'm 59
      
      CAD would be great for documenting patterns such as the eyebrow
      currently in 
      cardboard.  The eyebrow question will surface again in a year or so but
      the 
      patterns might not.  If we had a cad file they could be reproduced again
      and 
      again.  These files could live on the Matronics site to be accessed by
      all.
      
      I have seen mention of some of people putting the Piet into CAD perhaps 
      somebody would document the pieces that we all seem to need every once
      in a 
      while.  It will take some time but we could build a good library of 
      important bits.
      
      Interested to hear your thoughts.
      
      Steve in Maine
      This message, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and
      is transmitted for the sole use of the intended recipient.
      
      If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, copy or retain
      this e-mail or the information contained in it.  If you have received this
      e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or reply
      e-mail, and permanently delete this e-mail from your computer system.
      
      E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information
      could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete,
      or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any
      errors or omissions in the contents of this message. Finally, the recipient should
      check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company
      accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this
      email.
      
      AION Diagnostics, Level 2, 40-48 Subiaco Square Road, Subiaco 6008, Australia,
      Phone: +61 (8) 6461 9400, Fax: +61 (8) 6461 9499
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: CAD versus cardboard | 
      
      
      Hi,
       john here age 55 builder wanna be! Got many of the essentials: prints, desire,
      love of flying and the low and slow idea of open cockpit. Still lacking fundimental
      elements: place to build, tools, time and skill. The more I read the less
      confidence I have. I am better with wrenches and metal than I am with wood
      and glue.
      
      I have been hot for the piet since I learned about them and saw one. So its been
      a few years! The desire has not diminished, I have chased a few projects to
      buy with no success. Always something to prevent the deal! 
      
      I have a cad program, don't know how to use it efficiently to create laser cut
      drawings for my metal parts, but have access to the metal and resources to get
      it cut.
      
      That's my story and I am sticking to it!
      
      John
      
      
      Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry  
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: "Steve Glass" <redsglass@hotmail.com>
      To:pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: CAD versus cardboard
      
      
      Hi
      
      I have been on the list for about a year gathering info but not yet started 
      building.
      
      It would be intersting to know the average age of the people on the list.  I 
      would guess around mid 50's.  Assuming that I would guess  only a portion 
      are up on Cad.  I'm 59
      
      CAD would be great for documenting patterns such as the eyebrow currently in 
      cardboard.  The eyebrow question will surface again in a year or so but the 
      patterns might not.  If we had a cad file they could be reproduced again and 
      again.  These files could live on the Matronics site to be accessed by all.
      
      I have seen mention of some of people putting the Piet into CAD perhaps 
      somebody would document the pieces that we all seem to need every once in a 
      while.  It will take some time but we could build a good library of 
      important bits.
      
      Interested to hear your thoughts.
      
      Steve in Maine
      
      _________________________________________________________________
      The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here.  Get all the scoop. 
      http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | CAD versus cardboard | 
      
      
       Howdy piet list
      First post, just been lurking for a while
      FYI - I'm 30, married, living in Newnan, Georgia
      
      In regards to parts being cad drawn, I would be willing to knock a few
      drawings out. I am a mechanical engineer and have access to AutoCAD and
      Inventor (3D modeling).
      I don't have experience with much of this stuff, so I couldn't design
      the parts, but I could generate electronic versions of paper patterns
      and the like. 
      
      Let me know if there's interest
      
      Bill 
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | CAD versus cardboard | 
      
      
      Bob here.  Like to think of myself as 35 (Hexadecimal).  I've got thousands
      of hours drivin' tube, though mostly electrical.  I can do some 2D in
      AutoCAD.
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bill
      Rayfield
      Sent: January 6, 2007 10:11 AM
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: CAD versus cardboard
      
      
      <bill.rayfield@OptiLogistics.com>
      
       Howdy piet list
      First post, just been lurking for a while
      FYI - I'm 30, married, living in Newnan, Georgia
      
      In regards to parts being cad drawn, I would be willing to knock a few
      drawings out. I am a mechanical engineer and have access to AutoCAD and
      Inventor (3D modeling).
      I don't have experience with much of this stuff, so I couldn't design
      the parts, but I could generate electronic versions of paper patterns
      and the like.
      
      Let me know if there's interest
      
      Bill
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Securing plane and J3 eyebrows | 
      
      Nice drawings Hans, what software do you use to make them?
      
      Thanks
      
      Rick
      
      On 1/4/07, Hans Vander Voort <hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com> wrote:
      >
      > hans.vander.voort@alfalaval.com>
      >
      > Gene,
      >
      > Expand your search Aeronca Champ, Taylorcraft and J3 all have the same
      > type
      > of "eyebrow"
      >
      > $500 seems excessive for something you can easily make yourself for a lot
      > less.
      >
      > I made my own for my Corvair ( I call them Cooling ears)
      > http://www.mykitplane.com/Planes/fileslist2.cfm?AlbumID=74
      > Different dimension but same concept.
      >
      > Most important is the "scoop" dimension, measure a J3's and make a card
      > board prototype template.
      > Transfer this to Aluminum sheet, cut, drill, bend and pop rivet and your
      > done.
      >
      > Hans
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: CAD versus cardboard | 
      
      John,
      
      You guys talking about these CAD drawings are making my eyes glaze  over.  
      Stop with the nonsence and just start making some ribs.  At  this rate you will
      
      never get going!  You need to start with what you CAN  do.  Nobody needs any 
      "place to build" to make a rib jig and start  producing ribs.  A few sticks of
      
      spruce and a hand saw and glue are all you  need.  There has been a lot of 
      talk about tough love and  kicks-in-the-butt's on this site as of late. Here's
      
      some more---GET STARTED!  
      
      Dan  Helsper
      Poplar Grove, IL.
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Tough love........ | 
      
      To All,  QUIT YOUR CRYING AND GO DO SOME FLYING!!!!!!  All this senimental stuff
      is making me sick.
        Shad
        PS Just kidding.....GO BUCKEYES!!
      
       __________________________________________________
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 29 Msgs - 01/05/07 | 
      
      
      That reminds me! I'd completely forgotten. Last year
      sometime in June, the city works guys came here to
      check the drain system and they had a video snake.
      
      I'm not suggesting you contact your local city or
      plumber though. Who knows where their snakes have
      been! But there should be other inspection companies
      that have something similiar.
      
      Clif
      
      
      >
      > Bob Gow,
      >
      > I didn't catch that it was a partially built Piet that you were 
      > considering importing ino Canada. don't take this one to Transport Canada 
      > but lean on you local MDRA inspector to inspect look inside the wings etc. 
      > with a video camera on a stick. Acording to our local ispector he was able 
      > to make good inspection as he watched the screen and I don't think they 
      > did, but it would have been possible to record and save the images.
      >
      > Bill Weir
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | CAD versus cardboard | 
      
      Dan,
      
      I agree with you.
      I'm an engineer and know AutoCAD and thought about redrawing the plans but
      asked "why?" and dropped the idea quick smart.
      The original drawings are all you need plus some help from this pool of
      practical knowledge.
      I second your motion....just get building. I know I am!
      Having said that, I will do drawings for the metal fittings,  under cart and
      any to help get the geometry right.
      
      JohnW
        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of
      HelsperSew@aol.com
        Sent: Sunday, 7 January 2007 10:53 AM
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: CAD versus cardboard
      
      
        John,
      
        You guys talking about these CAD drawings are making my eyes glaze over.
      Stop with the nonsence and just start making some ribs.  At this rate you
      will never get going!  You need to start with what you CAN do.  Nobody needs
      any "place to build" to make a rib jig and start producing ribs.  A few
      sticks of spruce and a hand saw and glue are all you need.  There has been a
      lot of talk about tough love and kicks-in-the-butt's on this site as of
      late. Here's some more---GET STARTED!
      
        Dan Helsper
        Poplar Grove, IL.
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: CAD versus cardboard | 
      
      
      Dan's right.  I've got a rib building process going in an 8' x 12' shed.  In that
      small space I have a table saw, 2 belt sanders a drill press, bandsaw, scroll
      saw, grinder and a router table ...and that's just the bench tools.  I got
      the Tony Bingelis books and he gives some good tips on optimizing space.  I got
      to where I knew if I continued "waiting for the day" it probably wouldn't come
      so I did what I had to and I feel like I've got plenty of room.  When I wrap
      up the ribs soon I'll juggle things around so I can do the tail feathers.  There's
      hidden advantages to small workspaces, they're easier (cheaper) to heat.
      Oh yeah, there's a kerosene heater in there too.  If you really want to build
      this thing, just do it.  You won't regret it!  Most interesting and fun thing
      I've ever done.
      
      Decided to build it on 42nd birthday, completed first rib last April or May and
      just turned 43 a few months ago.  Married 22 years with a kid in college.  On
      a budget of about $2000 a year this is not something anybody with the interest
      couldn't learn to do or afford.  Go for it!
      
      --------
      Glenn Thomas
      N?????
      http://www.flyingwood.com
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85990#85990
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |