Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:42 AM - Re: Piet video on YouTube (Gene and Tammy)
     2. 05:45 AM - Re: what does Corky look like ? (Gene and Tammy)
     3. 05:52 AM - Re: Re: Tailwheel spring & Skid (Gene and Tammy)
     4. 06:03 AM - Another wing stitching ? (gus notti)
     5. 06:37 AM - Re: Another wing stitching ? (Rcaprd@aol.com)
     6. 07:25 AM - Another wing stitching ? (Oscar Zuniga)
     7. 07:49 AM - Re: Another wing stitching ? (Phillips, Jack)
     8. 08:35 AM - Re: Another wing stitching ? (gus notti)
     9. 01:05 PM - Re: Tailwheel spring & Skid (Don Emch)
    10. 01:30 PM - E-85 (was Fuel Tank) (Tim Verthein)
    11. 02:31 PM - Real Air Camper (Bill Church)
    12. 03:43 PM - Re: Real Air Camper (DJ Vegh)
    13. 04:49 PM - Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) (gus notti)
    14. 05:01 PM - Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) (Jeff Boatright)
    15. 05:37 PM - Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) (Mike Volckmann)
    16. 06:49 PM - Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) ()
    17. 07:25 PM - Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) (Gene and Tammy)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Piet video on YouTube | 
      
      Michael,
      Thanks for the interesting report.  I was really wondering about it.
      Gene
      
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: MICHAEL SILVIUS 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:27 PM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Piet video on YouTube
      
      
        This plane was advertized for sale localy here in Manie last year and 
      I went to see it. Workmanship over all looked decent. It is side-by-each 
      seating but it is a tight squeze. Mother better be real tiny. I believe 
      I measured it at 34 inch wide at the elbows. It has a door of sorts on 
      the left side. Also has a shelf that runs along the bottom edge of the 
      panel that is a X brace beween the two sides of the fuselage. The 
      cabanes are canted inwards with no wing center section, though as best I 
      could tell it is a two piece wing. The word was that it is a bit hot to 
      handle with the short wings.  I was also told that with the wider 
      frontal profile it is a bit dragier than she ought to be and could 
      actually use a bit more in the HP dept. 
        michael silvius
        scarborough, maine
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: Bill Church 
      
      
          There's a video on YouTube of a side-by-side Piet (that's currently 
      for sale on Barnstormers) flying on a bit of a windy day: 
      
           http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06_I-of-XhM
      
          If the link doesn't work, just type  wingit demo  in the YouTube 
      search box.
      
          The plane looks a little strange - wings look short (no center 
      section),  cabanes similar to a Baby Ace, landing gear looks narrow, and 
      of course, the fuse is wider (duh).
      
      
          Bill C
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: what does Corky look like ? | 
      
      Fits with the image I had in my mind. Corkey has to be a really "cool" 
      guy.
      Gene
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Rcaprd@aol.com 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:38 PM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: what does Corky look like ?
      
      
        Here is a picture of Corky, when he sat down for a minute, after 
      loading the 1942 Aeronca Defender.  Not sure who that is with him...  :) 
        he he he !! 
      
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      -----
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Tailwheel spring & Skid | 
      
      
      Don, is that Gold Wing your?
      Gene
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      >
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Another wing stitching ? | 
      
      One more quick question, does the original plans for the Air camper call for rib
      stitching?
        Would the FAA sign off if the wings were only glued with no other kind of attachments?
        I'm thinking about buying this flying project, (yes N number back in 1991) however
      when I asked the current owner if the fabric was rib stitched he said no,
      (not sure he know's what to look for)
         What are the guide lines requiring the stitching? Vse and Max weight...right?
         
        Thanks
      
      
      ---------------------------------
      Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels 
      in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Another wing stitching ? | 
      
      In a message dated 2/2/2007 8:04:58 AM Central Standard Time, 
      gus_notti@yahoo.com writes:
      One more quick question, does the original plans for the Air camper call for 
      rib stitching?
      Would the FAA sign off if the wings were only glued with no other kind of 
      attachments?
      I'm thinking about buying this flying project, (yes N number back in 1991) 
      however when I asked the current owner if the fabric was rib stitched he said 
      no, (not sure he know's what to look for)
       What are the guide lines requiring the stitching? Vse and Max weight...right?
      
      Thanks
      The plans don't show anything about the covering process.  Covering an 
      airplane is a whole seperate process, and isn't specific to any certain type, except
      
      for Vne (which requires closer spacing of the rib stitches).  The Stitts 
      process is what I used, and it calls out 3 1/2" spacing of the stitches, and in
      
      the prop wash plus one rib, it calls out 2 1/2" spacing.  I have a total of 
      about 500 stitches in my wing.  You can easily see the stitches under the 2" tape.
      
       I think Stitts suplies this document for sale, and should be closely 
      followed.  I doubt if the FAA or a DAR would sign off on it, and I question how
      it 
      got it's original Airworthyness Certificate.  My guess is that it doesn't have
      
      very many actual flight hours, for fear of the fabric coming off.  The 1/2" 
      wide cap strips just simply doesn't have enough area to glue to, and I would also
      
      suggest a close look at the ribs, to see if any of them are pulled sideways, 
      and possibly cracked,  from the heat shrink process.  It might even require a 
      re-cover job, which would risk destroying some ribs.  After a very close 
      inspection inside the wing, if there is no damage, you could probaly remove the
      
      paint along the ribs, stitch it, and put the 2" tape on top, then re-paint.  It
      
      amazes me why someone would cut corners in such a critical area.  On the other
      
      hand, maybe it actually does have stitches, and the current owner just doesn't
      
      know what to look for.
      
      Chuck G.
      NX770CG
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Another wing stitching ? | 
      
      
      Gus; the requirement for rib stitching comes from the covering system 
      manufacturer (Poly-Fiber, etc.) as well as from best practices guidelines.  
      As mentioned in an earlier post, one Pieter feels that Hipec may be the only 
      manufacturer that does not require rib stitching.  If you can determine the 
      covering system used on the airplane, that would help.
      
      I would think that you could go back and do rib stitching by removing the 
      paint over the ribs, stitching after applying rib lace reinforcing tape over 
      the rib area, going over that with finishing tapes, and then refinishing the 
      new areas.  Matter of fact, if the Stits method was used to cover the 
      aircraft, you don't even have to remove the paint and other finishes before 
      laying down the new work... they claim that all their components are 
      completely compatible with one another.  However, it will probably be easier 
      to see through the wing fabric to do the rib stitching if you remove the 
      finishes over the ribs, down to bare fabric.  It won't be as messy, either.
      
      Like the man says, "you can pay me now, or you can pay me later".  Somebody 
      didn't pay the man when the airplane was first covered ;o)
      
      Oscar Zuniga
      San Antonio, TX
      mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com
      website at http://www.flysquirrel.net
      
      _________________________________________________________________
      Valentines Day -- Shop for gifts that spell L-O-V-E at MSN Shopping 
      http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8323,ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24095&tcode=wlmtagline
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Another wing stitching ? | 
      
      Regardless of the plans (they don't mention covering at all), the fabric
      should be ribstitched.  If the fabric is just glued to the capstrips,
      the ribs are loaded in tension and are prone to failure.  Ribstitching
      (more properly called rib-lacing) loads the ribs in compression, where
      they are much stronger.  I know of a number of designs which call out
      glued fabric rather than laced (the Osprey 2 amphibian comes to mind),
      but in all cases, the rib cap is at least 2" wide, providing generous
      area to glue to, and the rib itself is solid plywood - not a built up
      truss rib.  I wouldn't fly a Pietenpol with glued on fabric.  Makes you
      wonder what other corners got cut in the building process.  Ribstitching
      just doesn't take that long - about 12 hours per wing.
      
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      NX899JP
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of gus
      notti
      Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:02 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Another wing stitching ?
      
      
      One more quick question, does the original plans for the Air camper call
      for rib stitching?
      
      Would the FAA sign off if the wings were only glued with no other kind
      of attachments?
      
      I'm thinking about buying this flying project, (yes N number back in
      1991) however when I asked the current owner if the fabric was rib
      stitched he said no, (not sure he know's what to look for)
      
       What are the guide lines requiring the stitching? Vse and Max
      weight...right?
      
      
      Thanks
      
      
        _____  
      
      Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels 
      in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel
      <http://travel.yahoo.com/hotelsearchpage;_ylc=X3oDMTFtaTIzNXVjBF9TAzk3ND
      A3NTg5BF9zAzI3MTk0ODEEcG9zAzIEc2VjA21haWx0YWdsaW5lBHNsawNxMS0wNw--%0d%0a
      >  to find your fit. 
      
      
      _________________________________________________
      
      This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege
      d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i
      n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any 
      other use of the email by you is prohibited.
      
      Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Another wing stitching ? | 
      
         I'm going to go get the Pietenpol this weekend, I know what to look for with
      a fabric covered airplane. If the wing ribs are not stitched I will ribstitch
      them before I fly it, 
        NO IF AND BUTTS ABOUT IT!
        ( I have 2 many mouths to feed to have something stupid happen). I have over
      a 1000 + hours all in tube and fabric planes I have never flown a fabric covered
      plane with out the fabric being attached properly. I sure in the hell not starting
      now.
        I'm thinking the current owner don't know what to look for. 
        Yes if needed it will be an fairly easy job, no topcoat of paint is on the fabric,
      it's through silver. I guess it's been flying that way since A/W was issused
      in 1991.
         Thanks for your thoughts!
        Gus
      
      
      ---------------------------------
      Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
      in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Tailwheel spring & Skid | 
      
      
      Chuck,
         Three-points come pretty easy, as long as you keep thinking, "hold it off, hold
      it off, hold it off."  If I give the tall gear/wheels a chance to touch first,
      which is easy to do, I am guaranteed a bounce.  It does have a fairly high
      deck angle.  Usually as long as I "hold it off, hold it off" on the second landing
      it is usually slowed up enough to be at the right angle to touch all three.
      I think that's the key.  Sometimes if it's been a few weeks or so since
      I've flown my brain seems to forget that it is kind of a steep three-point.  If
      my nose tank is full it seems to take a very conscious full pull back to my
      stop to get the tail to touch with the mains.  It is much easier when the tank
      is at least a few gallons lower.  Hard surface landings aren't my favorite, but
      I've done some.  Not too much different I guess, probably more psychological
      than anything but I still don't like them.  A cool thing is that the tires don't
      chirp, it's more like a short howl to get them up to speed.  Hard surface
      takeoffs seem no different than grass.
         Gene, no that's not my Goldwing.  That picture was taken at Barber Airport.
      Forrest Barber is the Goldwing guy.  My dad is a big Goldwing groupie and I do
      have to admit, it is one classy and nice to ride bike.  He's had it all over
      the country, with probably over 100,000 miles on it by now.
         The good flying weather isn't too far off!
      Don Emch 
      NX899DE
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=92422#92422
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | E-85 (was Fuel Tank) | 
      
      
      We have some guys in the Corvair clubs running E-85 in their Corvair
      cars....here's what I know for sure (mostly) and I imagine most of the
      same would apply:
      
      Make darn sure every plastic or rubber part in the fuel system is
      alchohol compatible (old rubber, seals, gaskets, fuel pump diaphrams,
      etc..won't be) Also, the alchohol is a heck of a fuel system cleaner,
      so if you have things that are relying on old "gunk" to keep them
      sealed, they'll probably start leaking.
      
      You have higher octane, but less BTU's, so you'll lose a bit of power
      and "mileage" but can use advanced timing and higher compression
      (probably not an issue in a model A) which can usually make up for most
      of the loss.
      
      You will need to rejet the carb..you need everything richer.
      
      And you'll need to tweak the timing...advanced a bit.
      
      That's what I know from an old car perspective. 
      
      Tim in Bovey
      
      
      > 
      > Time: 06:40:43 AM PST US
      > From: lshutks@webtv.net (Leon Stefan)
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tank
      > 
      > 
      > Beside having a fuel tank that won't melt from ethanol, what else
      > would
      > be required to make a Model A Piet E-85 compatible. ? Anyone? Leon S.
      > Looking to the future.
      > 
      
      
      ==
      You *can* repair a flip-flop with a capacitor!
      ==
      
      
      Get your own web address.  
      http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      For a chuckle, here's a photo of an  air camper that really lives up to
      its name.
      
      do not archive
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Real Air Camper | 
      
      love it!   HA!!!
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Bill Church 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 3:30 PM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Real Air Camper
      
      
        For a chuckle, here's a photo of an  air camper that really lives up 
      to its name.
      
        do not archive
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) | 
      
      Why would you want too?  E85 is a joke, it's not solving any energy issues just
      creating more. I know that's a very hard truth but that's the way it is.
        I'm a active ag producer, As a grower Bio-Diesel is the way to go after we start
      producing small 4 cylinder motors like the Germans currently do. 50 + MPG
      that where the potential lays!
         
         
         
        Good luck. I know that's a BIG can of worms.....
      
      
      Tim Verthein <minoxphotographer@yahoo.com> wrote:
      
      We have some guys in the Corvair clubs running E-85 in their Corvair
      cars....here's what I know for sure (mostly) and I imagine most of the
      same would apply:
      
      Make darn sure every plastic or rubber part in the fuel system is
      alchohol compatible (old rubber, seals, gaskets, fuel pump diaphrams,
      etc..won't be) Also, the alchohol is a heck of a fuel system cleaner,
      so if you have things that are relying on old "gunk" to keep them
      sealed, they'll probably start leaking.
      
      You have higher octane, but less BTU's, so you'll lose a bit of power
      and "mileage" but can use advanced timing and higher compression
      (probably not an issue in a model A) which can usually make up for most
      of the loss.
      
      You will need to rejet the carb..you need everything richer.
      
      And you'll need to tweak the timing...advanced a bit.
      
      That's what I know from an old car perspective. 
      
      Tim in Bovey
      
      
      > 
      > Time: 06:40:43 AM PST US
      > From: lshutks@webtv.net (Leon Stefan)
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tank
      > 
      > 
      > Beside having a fuel tank that won't melt from ethanol, what else
      > would
      > be required to make a Model A Piet E-85 compatible. ? Anyone? Leon S.
      > Looking to the future.
      > 
      
      
      ==
      You *can* repair a flip-flop with a capacitor!
      ==
      
      
      Get your own web address. 
      http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL
      
      
      ---------------------------------
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) | 
      
      
      I'm guessing you'd "want to" because it's simply dealing with 
      reality. Seasonally, autogas contains alcohol. If you don't have 
      access to avgas (as we don't at our little country strip, 2GA9), it's 
      something to deal with.
      
      But man-o-man, would I love to be driving one of those 
      high-efficiency diesels on biodiesel. I'm 100% with you there.
      
      Someone commented that Citgo doesn't lace it's juice with alcohol. 
      Does anyone know more about this?
      
      Thanks,
      
      Jeff
      
      >Why would you want too?  E85 is a joke, it's not solving any energy 
      >issues just creating more. I know that's a very hard truth but 
      >that's the way it is.
      >I'm a active ag producer, As a grower Bio-Diesel is the way to go 
      >after we start producing small 4 cylinder motors like the Germans 
      >currently do. 50 + MPG that where the potential lays!
      >
      >
      >Good luck. I know that's a BIG can of worms.....
      >
      >
      >Tim Verthein <minoxphotographer@yahoo.com> wrote:
      >
      >
      >We have some guys in the Corvair clubs running E-85 in their Corvair
      >cars....here's what I know for sure (mostly) and I imagine most of the
      >same would apply:
      >
      >Make darn sure every plastic or rubber part in the fuel system is
      >alchohol compatible (old rubber, seals, gaskets, fuel pump diaphrams,
      >etc..won't be) Also, the alchohol is a heck of a fuel system cleaner,
      >so if you have things that are relying on old "gunk" to keep them
      >sealed, they'll probably start leaking.
      >
      >You have higher octane, but less BTU's, so you'll lose a bit of power
      >and "mileage" but can use advanced timing and higher compression
      >(probably not an issue in a model A) which can usually make up for most
      >of the loss.
      >
      >You will need to rejet the carb..you need everything richer.
      >
      >And you'll need to tweak the timing...advanced a bit.
      >
      >That's what I know from an old car perspective.
      >
      >Tim in Bovey
      >
      >
      >>
      >>  Time: 06:40:43 AM PST US
      >>  From: lshutks@webtv.net (Leon Stefan)
      >>  Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tank
      >>
      >>
      >>  Beside having a fuel tank that won't melt from ethanol, what else
      >>  would
      >>  be required
      >
      >
      ><http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      
      
      -- 
      Jeffrey H. Boatright, Ph.D.
      Associate Professor
      Department of Ophthalmology
      Emory University School of Medicine
      Atlanta, GA 30322
      Editor-in-Chief
      Molecular Vision
      http://www.molvis.org/
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) | 
      
      >From what I have been reading one burns 100 BTUs of natural gas to produce 
      80-120 BTUs of ethanol (from corn numbers change if you are using sugar can
      e).  Sounds like playing at being green while accomplishing nothing to get 
      to reduce the US's dependency on petroleum.  I would agree that bio-diesel 
      run in small motors like the new VW bug shows a lot more promise.=0A =0AMik
      e=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: gus notti <gus_notti@yahoo.co
      m>=0ATo: pietenpol-list@matronics.com=0ASent: Friday, February 2, 2007 5:47
      :38 PM=0ASubject: Re: Pietenpol-List: E-85 (was Fuel Tank)=0A=0A=0AWhy woul
      d you want too?  E85 is a joke, it's not solving any energy issues just cre
      ating more. I know that's a very hard truth but that's the way it is.=0AI'm
       a active ag producer, As a grower Bio-Diesel is the way to go after we sta
      rt producing small 4 cylinder motors like the Germans currently do. 50 + MP
      G that where the potential lays!=0A =0A =0A =0AGood luck. I know that's a B
      IG can of worms.....=0A=0A=0ATim Verthein <minoxphotographer@yahoo.com> wro
       guys in the Corvair clubs running E-85 in their Corvair=0Acars....here's w
      hat I know for sure (mostly) and I imagine most of the=0Asame would apply:
      =0A=0AMake darn sure every plastic or rubber part in the fuel system is=0Aa
      lchohol compatible (old rubber, seals, gaskets, fuel pump diaphrams,=0Aetc.
      .won't be) Also, the alchohol is a heck of a fuel system cleaner,=0Aso if y
      ou have things that are relying on old "gunk" to keep them=0Asealed, they'l
      l probably start leaking.=0A=0AYou have higher octane, but less BTU's, so y
      ou'll lose a bit of power=0Aand "mileage" but can use advanced timing and h
      igher compression=0A(probably not an issue in a model A) which can usually 
      make up for most=0Aof the loss.=0A=0AYou will need to rejet the carb..you n
      eed everything richer.=0A=0AAnd you'll need to tweak the timing...advanced 
      a bit.=0A=0AThat's what I know from an old car perspective. =0A=0ATim in Bo
      vey=0A=0A=0A> =0A> Time: 06:40:43 AM PST US=0A> From: lshutks@webtv.net (Le
      on Stefan)=0A> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tank=0A> =0A> =0A> Beside havi
      ng a fuel tank that won't melt from ethanol, what else=0A> would=0A> be req
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) | 
      
      
      Popping open 12 oz of fish bait:
      
      While I agree that bio-deisel has a lot of promise that may not be realized by
      ethanol, the refining costs of ethanol are very simlar to the refining costs of
      gasoline.  Oil refineries run at about a 44% energy cost, meaning that it takes
      about 100 BTUs to produce about 120-130 BTUs of gasoline.  It doesn't matter,
      in terms of energy used, what the fuel is that makes the heat that distills
      the crude and pumps it around.
      Ethanol certainly requires energy to make, but that energy can theoretically come
      from ethanol, not just natural gas, or coal, or oil, or even buffalo chips.
      The real tell-tale is going to be the cost of converting whiskey and government
      subsidized plow-under into auto fuel, or the political costs of making the
      sugar cane growers of Cuba wealthy, compared to the costs of keeping the mid-east
      oil-producing nations in operation.  
      
      Mike Hardaway
      
      
      ---- Mike Volckmann <mike_cfi@yahoo.com> wrote: 
      > >From what I have been reading one burns 100 BTUs of natural gas to produce 80-120
      BTUs of ethanol (from corn numbers change if you are using sugar cane).
      Sounds like playing at being green while accomplishing nothing to get to reduce
      the US's dependency on petroleum.  I would agree that bio-diesel run in small
      motors like the new VW bug shows a lot more promise.
      
      Mike
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----
      From: gus notti <gus_notti@yahoo.com>
      Sent: Friday, February 2, 2007 5:47:38 PM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: E-85 (was Fuel Tank)
      
      
      Why would you want too?  E85 is a joke, it's not solving any energy issues just
      creating more. I know that's a very hard truth but that's the way it is.
      I'm a active ag producer, As a grower Bio-Diesel is the way to go after we start
      producing small 4 cylinder motors like the Germans currently do. 50 + MPG that
      where the potential lays!
      
      
      Good luck. I know that's a BIG can of worms.....
      
      
      Tim Verthein <minoxphotographer@yahoo.com> wrote:
      
      We have some guys in the Corvair clubs running E-85 in their Corvair
      cars....here's what I know for sure (mostly) and I imagine most of the
      same would apply:
      
      Make darn sure every plastic or rubber part in the fuel system is
      alchohol compatible (old rubber, seals, gaskets, fuel pump diaphrams,
      etc..won't be) Also, the alchohol is a heck of a fuel system cleaner,
      so if you have things that are relying on old "gunk" to keep them
      sealed, they'll probably start leaking.
      
      You have higher octane, but less BTU's, so you'll lose a bit of power
      and "mileage" but can use advanced timing and higher compression
      (probably not an issue in a model A) which can usually make up for most
      of the loss.
      
      You will need to rejet the carb..you need everything richer.
      
      And you'll need to tweak the timing...advanced a bit.
      
      That's what I know from an old car perspective. 
      
      Tim in Bovey
      
      
      > 
      > Time: 06:40:43 AM PST US
      > From: lshutks@webtv.net (Leon Stefan)
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tank
      > 
      > 
      > Beside having a fuel tank that won't melt from ethanol, what else
      > would
      > be req
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: E-85 (was Fuel Tank) | 
      
      Re: Pietenpol-List: E-85 (was Fuel Tank)Don't know about Citgo but BP 
      stations are alcohol free in the area (Tennessee) I live in.  I have 
      been told by a station manager that BP's policy is not to use alcohol 
      unless it's the law.  I still do an alcohol check each time, just in 
      case.  It's so easy, even a cave man could do it.
      Gene
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |