Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:30 AM - Re: Re: Wide body. (Max Hegler)
     2. 06:45 AM - Re: Re: Engines (Max Hegler)
     3. 07:57 AM - Re: Brodhead - who's going this year? (Skip Gadd)
     4. 08:55 AM - Re: Re: Wide body. (walt evans)
     5. 10:32 AM - Re: Wide body. (kb2qqm)
     6. 10:39 AM - Re: Re: Wide body. (Gordon Bowen)
     7. 10:59 AM - Re: Who's going to Brodhead? (Tim Verthein)
     8. 03:52 PM - Continental Motor Mount Jigs Photos? (Ben Charvet)
     9. 03:52 PM - weight of NX41CC (Oscar Zuniga)
    10. 04:42 PM - Re: Continental Motor Mount Jigs Photos? (Gordon Bowen)
    11. 07:05 PM - Re: Shad Bell: Tractor Pull Competition (shad bell)
    12. 08:56 PM - Re: weight of NX41CC (Dick Navratil)
    13. 09:02 PM - Re: Piet Builder Identity (Roman Bukolt)
    14. 09:38 PM - Re: Saw Blades (del magsam)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I understand that...Pietpenpol about 80% done with 80% to go and RV-7 about 
      20% done with 80% to go...
      
      Take Care,
      Max Hegler
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "kb2qqm" <kb2qqm@mac.com>
      Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 9:47 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Wide body.
      
      
      > A part of me just loves the look, and the wood, and the vintage feel of 
      > the airplane.  Another part of me likes the quicknes of the sonex, with 
      > the
      > CNC drilled parts that just fit together.  Especially for a first time 
      > kit.
      >
      > Is there anywhere (anybody) that has an order parts list for the Empenage? 
      > How much spruce and Ply?
      >
      > Thanks..
      > Greg
      >
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Why are you laughing?  It sounds pretty good to me...am I missing something?
      
      Max
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "kb2qqm" <kb2qqm@mac.com>
      Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 11:29 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Engines
      
      
      > 
      > Engine Sound
      > 
      > http://www.stampe.org/USA%20pages/First%20run.wav
      > 
      > [Laughing]
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121309#121309
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      >
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Brodhead  -  who's going this year? | 
      
      Shad,
      We will probably leave Brodhead for West Virginia on Sunday. We could head back
      together. Felix likes to cruz about 67 or 68 mph.
      Skip
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: shad bell 
      Sent: 6/28/2007 7:26:40 PM 
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Brodhead - who's going this year?
      
      
      Skip, What day are you flying back home after you get to Brodhead?  If we get there
      we could fly part of the way home togeather down through Indianna.  I was
      thinking about going up to Oshkosh after Brodhead but not sure I want to spend
      2 million dollars to eat, sleep and tie an airplane down.  
      
      Shad
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Greg,
      Yes, I have a mat'l list from a previous builder, and a mat'l list quoted by 
      AS&S back in about 1998. I ordered from that and it worked out nicely. If 
      you like I'll send directly to you.
      Walt Evans
      NX140DL
      "No one ever learned anything by talking"
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "kb2qqm" <kb2qqm@mac.com>
      Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:47 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Wide body.
      
      
      >
      > I started studying the plans last night for a couple of hours, trying not 
      > to get psyched out.  I thought about making the whole thing just a little 
      > wider.
      >
      > Then I got to reading the building guide and the rest of the posts here, 
      > and decided this morning to build a rear cockpit mockup.  So I could see 
      > if there were any fit problems.
      > I fit.  But I see how it would be tight squeeze.  Maybe I can butter up 
      > the cockpit :-)
      > Then I started seeing how making the airplane wider affects so many other 
      > things.  At first I just started to imagine the fuselage and the extra 
      > wood required (weight), then I would have to redesign the center wing 
      > section, then the wing struts, the landing gear.  With all the extra 
      > weight and design changes, maybe a bigger engine.  My mind just started to 
      > snowball at the changes. So should I re-invent the wheel, and re-doo the 
      > whole airplane to a wider dimension, and take the weight penalty or should 
      > I build it to plans?   I think if I redesign it, then I become a test 
      > pilot.  The other dilema I am facing is the performance hit.  What's the 
      > airplane going to fly like once it's done?
      >
      > A part of me just loves the look, and the wood, and the vintage feel of 
      > the airplane.  Another part of me likes the quicknes of the sonex, with 
      > the
      > CNC drilled parts that just fit together.  Especially for a first time 
      > kit.
      >
      > Is there anywhere (anybody) that has an order parts list for the Empenage? 
      > How much spruce and Ply?
      >
      > Thanks..
      > Greg
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121292#121292
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      that would be great..
      
      
      Greg
      kb2qqm(at)mac.com
      
      
      Do not archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121377#121377
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Couple of points re mods on plans:
      1) no matter what, you are a test pilot, even if you build it to exact 
      plans.  You built it, you get to test it.  Keep that in mind each and every 
      time you do a pre-flight on any airplane.
      2) Everyone does some sort of mod to their plans and planes, it's just the 
      nature of homebuilding.  Some of the best plans for homebuilts were put out 
      by Rutan, and they were still highly modified by the individual builders.
      3) Making the body a little wider apparently does not have much negative 
      impact on performance, the Questar-Venture looks like an egg at the mid 
      section.  It's still one of the fastest homebuilts around.
      
      I've often lamented I didn't make the fuselage about 4" wider at the pilot's 
      seat and a tad "egg-shaped" the entire fuselage, had the darn thing 
      completely apart for rewelding the 4130 after the wreck.  Shoulda done it. 
      Lot easier than losing 40 lbs.
      Gordon
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "kb2qqm" <kb2qqm@mac.com>
      Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:47 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Wide body.
      
      
      >
      > I started studying the plans last night for a couple of hours, trying not 
      > to get psyched out.  I thought about making the whole thing just a little 
      > wider.
      >
      > Then I got to reading the building guide and the rest of the posts here, 
      > and decided this morning to build a rear cockpit mockup.  So I could see 
      > if there were any fit problems.
      > I fit.  But I see how it would be tight squeeze.  Maybe I can butter up 
      > the cockpit :-)
      > Then I started seeing how making the airplane wider affects so many other 
      > things.  At first I just started to imagine the fuselage and the extra 
      > wood required (weight), then I would have to redesign the center wing 
      > section, then the wing struts, the landing gear.  With all the extra 
      > weight and design changes, maybe a bigger engine.  My mind just started to 
      > snowball at the changes. So should I re-invent the wheel, and re-doo the 
      > whole airplane to a wider dimension, and take the weight penalty or should 
      > I build it to plans?   I think if I redesign it, then I become a test 
      > pilot.  The other dilema I am facing is the performance hit.  What's the 
      > airplane going to fly like once it's done?
      >
      > A part of me just loves the look, and the wood, and the vintage feel of 
      > the airplane.  Another part of me likes the quicknes of the sonex, with 
      > the
      > CNC drilled parts that just fit together.  Especially for a first time 
      > kit.
      >
      > Is there anywhere (anybody) that has an order parts list for the Empenage? 
      > How much spruce and Ply?
      >
      > Thanks..
      > Greg
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121292#121292
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Who's going to Brodhead? | 
      
      
      We are! Me 'n' th' wife.  Driving from Bovey, MN down to Minneapolis to
      see my folks thursday, then off to Brodhead Friday morning.  We're
      staying at the Gasthaus Motel in Monroe, where I understand their
      county fair is going on that weekend too. We're rolling out for Oshkosh
      Sunday morning.  Alledgedly we're staying at the Settle Inn in Kaukauna
      for two nights for Oshkosh, but I am skeptical as my wife made
      reservations on line, we have them confirmed with a printed
      confirmation, but it's at a "normal" rate, not the usual double or
      triple special Oshkosh rate everyone seems to have so I wouldn't be
      surprised to find out they're screwed up.  
      
      Interesting motel things I've learned this year. Legally, reservations
      mean nothing. They don't really HAVE to have a room, or one that meets
      the specifications that you reserved, not to mention the rate.  AND
      online confirmations may not be real.  We made reservations in
      Marshalltown Iowa for a day of Corvair racing over labor day. 
      Confirmed. Were e-mailed a confirmation.  We called to see about
      changing to a different room as it turns out my Son will be able to
      attend with us, and when we called they said they didn't have ANY
      reservation for us! Grrrrr. Kindlike how an airline dosen't really HAVE
      to have a plane. Or a seat. Or a flight..that you have a ticket for. 
      Cripes.
      
      Tim in Bovey
      
      ==
      You *can* repair a flip-flop with a capacitor!
      ==
      
      
      Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Continental Motor Mount Jigs Photos? | 
      
      
      Hi All,
      I'm getting ready to fabricate the motor mount for an A-65.  I remember 
      seeing some pictures of jigs others have used for this, but they don't 
      show up when browsing the archives.  Anyone out there have a picture of 
      the jig they used they could send me off list?  I'm sure I could come up 
      with something on my own, but like most of my Piet building I combine my 
      creativity with that of others..
      
      Ben Charvet
      Mims, Fl
      NX866BC
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | weight of NX41CC | 
      
      
      Per digital race car scales, with 3 qts. oil and any unusable fuel, 41CC 
      weighs 633 lbs.
      
      I don't believe in weighing without unusable fuel and minimum operating oil, 
      and consider it to be part of the basic empty weight.
      
      I weigh 151 lbs. according to the same scales, before I drank a beer and 
      after I drained my internal tank.  Prior to doing the W&B I flew 0.6 hrs. to 
      burn off some fuel in the airplane's tank, drained the rest, and did the 
      W&B.  Also checked the mechanical tach against a digital "True Tach" and 
      found the following:
      
      RPM- mechanical tach/digital tach
      1000/900
      1500/1330
      2000/1840
      2200/2000
      
      This explains why I can set power in level cruise and exceed redline (2250 
      RPM) on this engine so easily... it's reading about 200 RPM high when in 
      that range.  Now I know I can safely cruise it at 2450 indicated, which is 
      where it likes to cruise anyway.  With this prop I really need an A75 to 
      take full advantage ;o)
      
      Another delightful day of playing with the Pietenpol!
      
      Oscar Zuniga
      San Antonio, TX
      mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com
      website at http://www.flysquirrel.net
      
      _________________________________________________________________
      Picture this  share your photos and you could win big!  
      http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Continental Motor Mount Jigs Photos? | 
      
      
      Ben,
      I think we still have the A-75 motor mount laying around the hanger in 
      Palatka.  Think my builder buddies may have taken it to S&fun and sold same 
      but you're welcome to use it as a jig if it's still there.  Contact me off 
      group at gbowen@ptialaska.net and I'll give you the guy's telephone number 
      in Satsuma that you'd need to contact.
      Gordon
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Ben Charvet" <bcharvet@bellsouth.net>
      Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 2:50 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Continental Motor Mount Jigs Photos?
      
      
      >
      > Hi All,
      > I'm getting ready to fabricate the motor mount for an A-65.  I remember 
      > seeing some pictures of jigs others have used for this, but they don't 
      > show up when browsing the archives.  Anyone out there have a picture of 
      > the jig they used they could send me off list?  I'm sure I could come up 
      > with something on my own, but like most of my Piet building I combine my 
      > creativity with that of others..
      >
      > Ben Charvet
      > Mims, Fl
      > NX866BC
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Shad Bell: Tractor Pull Competition | 
      
        Hello guys,  BAD NEWS, while testing the engine for detonation friday afternoon
      all was going well with the test run untill I made one more full power check
      and everything went rough.  I pulled the power back and it almost quit so I
      quickly shut her down.  Went to pull the prop through and I'll be damned, I burnt
      up the #4 piston.  I then quickly switched from Iced Tea to cold Miller Light
      and started pulling everything apart.  I got the cylinder off and am waiting
      on parts now.  #4 is the same one we had to replace during the rebuild, Might
      have a messed up head (cracked) or might have a leaking helicoil for the plug.
      I am too stupid to give up trying to have it ready for Brodhead in 3 weeks
      but I will try up to the bitter end.  If I drive up with Dad we'll talk about
      it over some cold ones, and mabey I can bum a piet ride from one of the guys
      who actually make it there.  
         
        Not throwing in the towel yet
        Shad
      
      Okay Shad....my money is on you buddy at the Ohio State Fair tractor
      pull. Bring it on !
      
      Mike C. in Ohio
      
      
             
      ---------------------------------
      Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news,
      photos & more. 
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: weight of NX41CC | 
      
      
      Hey Oscar
      I want to order 3 of you beautiful data plates, but I can't remember the 
      important info.  What is your address and how much?
      Dick N.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 5:51 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: weight of NX41CC
      
      
      > <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      >
      > Per digital race car scales, with 3 qts. oil and any unusable fuel, 41CC 
      > weighs 633 lbs.
      >
      > I don't believe in weighing without unusable fuel and minimum operating 
      > oil, and consider it to be part of the basic empty weight.
      >
      > I weigh 151 lbs. according to the same scales, before I drank a beer and 
      > after I drained my internal tank.  Prior to doing the W&B I flew 0.6 hrs. 
      > to burn off some fuel in the airplane's tank, drained the rest, and did 
      > the W&B.  Also checked the mechanical tach against a digital "True Tach" 
      > and found the following:
      >
      > RPM- mechanical tach/digital tach
      > 1000/900
      > 1500/1330
      > 2000/1840
      > 2200/2000
      >
      > This explains why I can set power in level cruise and exceed redline (2250 
      > RPM) on this engine so easily... it's reading about 200 RPM high when in 
      > that range.  Now I know I can safely cruise it at 2450 indicated, which is 
      > where it likes to cruise anyway.  With this prop I really need an A75 to 
      > take full advantage ;o)
      >
      > Another delightful day of playing with the Pietenpol!
      >
      > Oscar Zuniga
      > San Antonio, TX
      > mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com
      > website at http://www.flysquirrel.net
      >
      > _________________________________________________________________
      > Picture this - share your photos and you could win big! 
      > http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Piet Builder Identity | 
      
      OK, all you creative geniuses who plan on making it to Brodhead, see if 
      you can come up with some type of Identity device so that we can spot 
      each other without having to stare down at your breast to see if you 
      have a name to go with these emails.
      Bill Rewey suggested something that could be spotted 30 ft. away, front 
      or back, like a certain common color wrist band or something on your hat 
      or cap if you're wearing one, or a common color bandana or whatever.
      Unless you guys like to stare down at other guys breasts ?????
      
      Roman Bukolt
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Rick Holland 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9:26 AM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Engines
      
      
        If you are getting a new table saw (or miter saw) blade I would 
      recommend a DIablo (96 tooth for a 10 inch). Expensive but makes a big 
      difference with the softer woods especially when you need to rip long 
      leading/trailing edge or capstip. Diablos are about half the thickness 
      of normal blades too. 
      
        Rick
      
      
        On 6/26/07, Tom Winter <c150gpilot@yahoo.com> wrote:
      <c150gpilot@yahoo.com>
      
          Hello all, I just got on board.   After about 10 years of dithering
          what to build, I've settled on a Pietenpol.  So far: 
          I have acquired 4 Model A Ford engines, and the Hoopman plans.  Two
          engines are soaking in kerosene, one is disassembled, and the 
      likeliest
          boat anchor is still untouched.  I'm hoping that cherry-picking from 
      
          the 4, I can get most of a good engine.  I have laid out the rib, 
      and
          next step is to put a new blade in my table saw.
          Tom Winter (past pres EAA 569, owner Cessna 150G)
      
      
          ObjectAge Ltd.
          Castle Rock, Colorado 
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      I use to sell commercial blades to wood shops, and my brother took over the business
      and is still selling commercial carbide products. So I know for a fact that
      a 96 teeth is way too many for ripping...40 is for ripping and a 60 tooth
      will work for ripping and crosscutting. the only time you need more than that
      is for mitering prefinished house trim or picture frames. or your saw is not running
      true, and only a few teeth are doing the work. Thin kerf is fine, but it
      has a harder time running true in thicker woods. The bottom line is this...cheap
      blades are stamped out of soft steel, and the carbide teeth are welded in
      without being sharpened too well. They will work better after they have been
      sharpened once. Higher dollar blades are ground plates, tensioned to run true
      at high rpms, teeth welded in and ground so that each tooth is following each
      other within .002. And good blades only produce good results if your arbor is
      running true on your saw. If you have a good saw
       and a good blade you can actually cut and leave no saw marks on your wood, making
      jointers obsolete, I throw my finger eating jointer out years ago. The secret
      to cutting capstrips and other thin pieces is a new wood insert in your saw
      and then crank  the running blade up through it so that there is no spaces between
      it and the blade.
        Del
      
      
             
      If you are getting a new table saw (or miter saw) blade I would recommend a DIablo
      (96 tooth for a 10 inch). Expensive but makes a big difference with the softer
      woods especially when you need to rip long leading/trailing edge or capstip.
      Diablos are about half the thickness of normal blades too. 
      
      Rick
      
      
      Del-New Richmond, Wi
      "farmerdel@rocketmail.com"
             
      ---------------------------------
      Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally,  mobile search that gives answers, not web links. 
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |