Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Mon 12/31/07


Total Messages Posted: 10



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:10 AM - landing gear (airlion@bellsouth.net)
     2. 05:49 AM - RDU again (Gene Rambo)
     3. 06:03 AM - oil change (Oscar Zuniga)
     4. 06:19 AM - Landing gear (lshutks@webtv.net (Leon Stefan))
     5. 06:50 AM - Re: landing gear (hvandervoo@aol.com)
     6. 08:08 AM - Re: Landing gear (Dick Navratil)
     7. 02:44 PM - Re: Landing gear (Graham Hansen)
     8. 03:03 PM - Re: Landing gear (Gordon Bowen)
     9. 04:16 PM - Project update (Jack T. Textor)
    10. 10:04 PM - Re: Landing gear (Ken Chambers)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:10:01 AM PST US
    From: airlion@bellsouth.net
    Subject: landing gear
    Has anyone ever thought about using a spring gear on the pietenpol. Wittman tailwind, Cessna 140, and the Zodiac 601 all use this gear to great success. The original PIET had a model A engine and Bernie went to a Corvair Like I am doing. I am not a purist so I am always thinking of a better way if there is one. Gardiner Mason


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:49:59 AM PST US
    From: "Gene Rambo" <GeneRambo@msn.com>
    Subject: RDU again
    I will be overnighting in RDU on Wednesday and Thursday this week again. I do not remember who it was that was going to be in VA over Christmas, but any chance of seeing a Piet this time?? Gene


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:03:26 AM PST US
    From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags@hotmail.com>
    Subject: oil change
    > > What oil were you using and how did your oil screen look? I'm using Aeroshell W100, SAE 50. For the oil screen, I took Mike Cuy's re commendation of washing it in a little bit of gasoline and then running tha t through a coffee filter. No metal that I could see.Oscar ZunigaSan Anton io, TXmailto: taildrags@hotmail.comwebsite at http://www.flysquirrel.net


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:19:28 AM PST US
    From: lshutks@webtv.net (Leon Stefan)
    Subject: Landing gear
    I'm not using spring gear, but have thought of wanting to try it if I ever built a second Piet. The lighter Grove aluminum gear legs would be the thing to use. Probably work best with with a steel tube fus., but with some beefing in the gear box area, I think it would work on the wood fus. also. I think you would have less hours of building time invested with the spring gear,but after all the beefing I don't think you would have much savings in weight. I built the J-3 type gear with Hagar brakes, and Douglass alum. atv. wheels and it is relatively light at 48 lbs. complete. This part is insane and I will never do it, but I would love to build a Piet. in all aluminum. The fus. built like a BD-4. Leon S. in Ks with nothing better to do but day dream because there is another damn artic blast blowing threw again today.


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:50:04 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: landing gear
    From: hvandervoo@aol.com
    I did, briefly. It would require significant strengthening of the Fuselage where the landing gear bolts on, to compensate for all the load being concentrated in one smaller place The resulting redesign would not gain any benefits. The split axle design is simple to make and immensely strong Happy New year and many great landings for 2008. Hans Pietenpol NX 15KV -----Original Message----- From: airlion@bellsouth.net Sent: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 7:09 am Subject: Pietenpol-List: landing gear Has anyone ever thought about using a spring gear on the pietenpol. Wittman tailwind, Cessna 140, and the Zodiac 601 all use this gear to great success. The original PIET had a model A engine and Bernie went to a Corvair Like I am doing. I am not a purist so I am always thinking of a better way if there is one. Gardiner Mason ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:08:20 AM PST US
    From: "Dick Navratil" <horzpool@goldengate.net>
    Subject: Re: Landing gear
    Hey Leon I know winters get a bit long, but when you start thinking about skining a Piet in aluminum its time to take a vacation or change brands of tequilla. Or check your carbon monoxide detectors for a reason for such thinking. Save that kind of talk for April 1. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leon Stefan" <lshutks@webtv.net> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:18 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Landing gear > > I'm not using spring gear, but have thought of wanting to try it if I > ever built a second Piet. The lighter Grove aluminum gear legs would be > the thing to use. Probably work best with with a steel tube fus., but > with some beefing in the gear box area, I think it would work on the > wood fus. also. I think you would have less hours of building time > invested with the spring gear,but after all the beefing I don't think > you would have much savings in weight. I built the J-3 type gear with > Hagar brakes, and Douglass alum. atv. wheels and it is relatively light > at 48 lbs. complete. This part is insane and I will never do it, but I > would love to build a Piet. in all aluminum. The fus. built like a BD-4. > Leon S. in Ks with nothing better to do but day dream because there is > another damn artic blast blowing threw again today. > > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:44:23 PM PST US
    From: "Graham Hansen" <ghans@cable-lynx.net>
    Subject: Re: Landing gear
    Leon Stefan said: "This part is insane and I will never do it, but I would love to build a Piet. in all aluminum." My reaction is "Why not?" In fact, I seriously considered doing so some 25 years ago, but had too much on the go at the time to get any further than the idea stage. Nowadays, I'm too darned old and no longer have a workplace large enough for such a project. However, I wasn't going to skin the a/c with sheet aluminum. Too heavy. Fabric is lighter and would retain the authentic(?) external appearance. The intention was to substitute aluminum alloy structural members for the wooden parts of the original design. These would have been standard extruded sections and formed angles, channels, etc. riveted or bolted together according to standard aircraft practice. At first I considered an all-aluminum fuselage with fabric covering, but had settled on a welded steel tubing truss before the whole idea was shelved. This creation would have been "all metal" rather than "all aluminum". A spring steel landing gear was never considered because the highly localized loads on the structure would have required much re-design--besides altering the appearance of an airplane that was supposed to mimic the Pietenpol. The primary motivation for the exercise was to use a substitute material for scarce (and expensive) aircraft quality spruce; the secondary goal was to perhaps save some weight. I still regret that I never had the time to follow it through. Happy New Year! Graham Hansen (My Pietenpol, CF-AUN, is a standard wooden version)


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:03:45 PM PST US
    From: "Gordon Bowen" <gbowen@ptialaska.net>
    Subject: Re: Landing gear
    Grant, Think the key reason for not building the Piete out of Al has to due with metal fatigue. As you probably can feel, the fuselage flexes a heck of alot every time you land. My Quasi-Piete is made out of 4130 and I can feel the flex every landing, especially if I don't make a smooth landing and let the tail down slowly. Secondly, one of the reasons the firewall is not AL has to do with the burning nature of AL. Boeing and other big guys have AL longerons and spars, but the structural I-beam design accounts for the flex fatigue of the metal. I've broken enough Al lawn chairs in my day to know I'd be really cautious about making Piete longerons out of AL tube. Gordon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Hansen" <ghans@cable-lynx.net> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 1:37 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Landing gear > <ghans@cable-lynx.net> > > Leon Stefan said: > "This part is insane and I will never do it, but I would love to build a > Piet. in all aluminum." > > My reaction is "Why not?" > > In fact, I seriously considered doing so some 25 years ago, but had too > much on the go at the time to get any further than the idea stage. > Nowadays, I'm too darned old and no longer have a workplace large enough > for such a project. > > However, I wasn't going to skin the a/c with sheet aluminum. Too heavy. > Fabric is lighter and would retain the authentic(?) external appearance. > The intention was to substitute aluminum alloy structural members for the > wooden parts of the original design. These would have > been standard extruded sections and formed angles, channels, etc. riveted > or bolted together according to standard aircraft practice. > > At first I considered an all-aluminum fuselage with fabric covering, but > had settled on a welded steel tubing truss before the whole idea was > shelved. This creation would have been "all metal" rather than "all > aluminum". > > A spring steel landing gear was never considered because the highly > localized loads on the structure would have required much > re-design--besides altering the appearance of an airplane that was > supposed to mimic the Pietenpol. > > The primary motivation for the exercise was to use a substitute material > for scarce (and expensive) aircraft quality spruce; the secondary goal was > to perhaps save some weight. I still regret that I never had the time to > follow it through. > > Happy New Year! > > Graham Hansen > > (My Pietenpol, CF-AUN, is a standard wooden version) > > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:16:43 PM PST US
    Subject: Project update
    From: "Jack T. Textor" <jtextor@thepalmergroup.com>
    A great long weekend allowed me to just about complete my center section and start assembling the left wing. It's fun to see something "big" for a change. I posted some pictures on my site; they are at the end of the Piet Project page. Still a long way to go! Happy New Year to all! Jack www.textors.com <http://www.textors.com/> do not archive


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:04:15 PM PST US
    From: "Ken Chambers" <ken.riffic@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Landing gear
    What size are your wheels, Leon? What kind of brakes are you using? Do you have a photo available? I've been thinking about trying to find ATF wheels that are tall and skinny enough to look like the old aerowheels. Happy New Year everyone Ken in Austin, knocking out walls and pricing capstrips. On Dec 31, 2007 8:18 AM, Leon Stefan <lshutks@webtv.net> wrote: > > I'm not using spring gear, but have thought of wanting to try it if I > ever built a second Piet. The lighter Grove aluminum gear legs would be > the thing to use. Probably work best with with a steel tube fus., but > with some beefing in the gear box area, I think it would work on the > wood fus. also. I think you would have less hours of building time > invested with the spring gear,but after all the beefing I don't think > you would have much savings in weight. I built the J-3 type gear with > Hagar brakes, and Douglass alum. atv. wheels and it is relatively light > at 48 lbs. complete. This part is insane and I will never do it, but I > would love to build a Piet. in all aluminum. The fus. built like a BD-4. > Leon S. in Ks with nothing better to do but day dream because there is > another damn artic blast blowing threw again today. > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --