Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:10 AM - landing gear (airlion@bellsouth.net)
     2. 05:49 AM - RDU again (Gene Rambo)
     3. 06:03 AM - oil change (Oscar Zuniga)
     4. 06:19 AM - Landing gear (lshutks@webtv.net (Leon Stefan))
     5. 06:50 AM - Re: landing gear (hvandervoo@aol.com)
     6. 08:08 AM - Re: Landing gear (Dick Navratil)
     7. 02:44 PM - Re: Landing gear (Graham Hansen)
     8. 03:03 PM - Re: Landing gear (Gordon Bowen)
     9. 04:16 PM - Project update (Jack T. Textor)
    10. 10:04 PM - Re: Landing gear (Ken Chambers)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Has anyone ever thought about using a spring gear on the pietenpol. Wittman tailwind,
      Cessna 140, and the Zodiac 601 all use this gear to great success. The
      original PIET had a model A engine and Bernie went to a Corvair Like I am doing.
      I am not a purist so I am always thinking of a better way if there is one.
      Gardiner Mason
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      I will be overnighting in RDU on Wednesday and Thursday this week again. 
       I do not remember who it was that was going to be in VA over Christmas, 
      but any chance of seeing a Piet this time??
      
      Gene
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      > > What oil were you using and how did your oil screen look?
      
      I'm using Aeroshell W100, SAE 50.  For the oil screen, I took Mike Cuy's re
      commendation of washing it in a little bit of gasoline and then running tha
      t through a coffee filter.  No metal that I could see.Oscar ZunigaSan Anton
      io, TXmailto: taildrags@hotmail.comwebsite at http://www.flysquirrel.net
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I'm not  using spring gear, but have thought of wanting to try it if I
      ever built a second Piet. The lighter Grove aluminum gear legs would be
      the thing to use. Probably work best with with a steel tube fus., but
      with some beefing in the gear box area, I think it would work on the
      wood fus. also. I think you would have less hours of building time
      invested with the spring gear,but after all the beefing I don't think
      you would have much savings in weight. I built the J-3 type gear with
      Hagar brakes, and Douglass alum. atv. wheels and it is relatively light
      at 48 lbs. complete. This part is insane and I will never do it, but I
      would love to build a Piet. in all aluminum. The fus. built like a BD-4.
      Leon S. in Ks with nothing better to do but day dream because there is
      another damn artic blast blowing threw again today.
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: landing gear | 
      
      I did, briefly.
      It would require significant strengthening of the Fuselage where the landing gear
      bolts on, to compensate for all the load being concentrated in one smaller
      place
      The resulting redesign would not gain any benefits.
      
      The split axle design is simple to make and immensely strong
      
      Happy New year and many great landings for 2008.
      
      Hans
      Pietenpol NX 15KV
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: airlion@bellsouth.net
      Sent: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 7:09 am
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: landing gear
      
      
      
      Has anyone ever thought about using a spring gear on the pietenpol. Wittman 
      tailwind, Cessna 140, and the Zodiac 601 all use this gear to great success. The
      
      original PIET had a model A engine and Bernie went to a Corvair Like I am doing.
      
      I am not a purist so I am always thinking of a better way if there is one. 
      Gardiner Mason
      
      
      ________________________________________________________________________
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Landing gear | 
      
      
      Hey Leon
      I know winters get a bit long, but when you start thinking about skining a 
      Piet in aluminum its time to take a vacation or change brands of tequilla. 
      Or check your carbon monoxide detectors for a reason for such thinking. 
      Save that kind of talk for April 1.
      Dick N.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Leon Stefan" <lshutks@webtv.net>
      Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:18 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Landing gear
      
      
      >
      > I'm not  using spring gear, but have thought of wanting to try it if I
      > ever built a second Piet. The lighter Grove aluminum gear legs would be
      > the thing to use. Probably work best with with a steel tube fus., but
      > with some beefing in the gear box area, I think it would work on the
      > wood fus. also. I think you would have less hours of building time
      > invested with the spring gear,but after all the beefing I don't think
      > you would have much savings in weight. I built the J-3 type gear with
      > Hagar brakes, and Douglass alum. atv. wheels and it is relatively light
      > at 48 lbs. complete. This part is insane and I will never do it, but I
      > would love to build a Piet. in all aluminum. The fus. built like a BD-4.
      > Leon S. in Ks with nothing better to do but day dream because there is
      > another damn artic blast blowing threw again today.
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Landing gear | 
      
      
      Leon Stefan said:
      "This part is insane and I will never do it, but I would love to build a 
      Piet. in all aluminum."
      
      My reaction is "Why not?"
      
      In fact, I seriously considered doing so some 25 years ago, but had too much 
      on the go at the time to get any further than the idea stage. Nowadays, I'm 
      too darned old and no longer have a workplace large enough for such a 
      project.
      
      However, I wasn't going to skin the a/c with sheet aluminum. Too heavy. 
      Fabric is lighter and would retain the authentic(?) external appearance. The 
      intention was to substitute aluminum alloy structural members for the wooden 
      parts of the original design. These would have
      been standard extruded sections and formed angles, channels, etc. riveted or 
      bolted together according to standard aircraft practice.
      
      At first I considered an all-aluminum fuselage with fabric covering, but had 
      settled on a welded steel tubing truss before the whole idea was shelved. 
      This creation  would have been "all metal" rather than "all aluminum".
      
      A spring steel landing gear was never considered because the highly 
      localized loads on the structure would have required much re-design--besides 
      altering the appearance of an airplane that was supposed to mimic the 
      Pietenpol.
      
      The primary motivation for the exercise was to use a substitute material for 
      scarce (and expensive) aircraft quality spruce; the secondary goal was to 
      perhaps save some weight. I still regret that I never had the time to follow 
      it through.
      
      Happy New Year!
      
      Graham Hansen
      
      (My  Pietenpol, CF-AUN, is a standard wooden version)
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Landing gear | 
      
      
      Grant,
      Think the key reason for not building the Piete out of Al has to due with 
      metal fatigue.  As you probably can feel, the fuselage flexes a heck of alot 
      every time you land.  My Quasi-Piete is made out of 4130 and I can feel the 
      flex every landing, especially if I don't make a smooth landing and let the 
      tail down slowly.  Secondly, one of the reasons the firewall is not AL has 
      to do with the burning nature of AL.   Boeing and other big guys have AL 
      longerons and spars, but the structural I-beam design accounts for the flex 
      fatigue of the metal.   I've broken enough Al lawn chairs in my day to know 
      I'd be really cautious about making Piete longerons out of AL tube.
      Gordon
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Graham Hansen" <ghans@cable-lynx.net>
      Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 1:37 PM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Landing gear
      
      
      > <ghans@cable-lynx.net>
      >
      > Leon Stefan said:
      > "This part is insane and I will never do it, but I would love to build a 
      > Piet. in all aluminum."
      >
      > My reaction is "Why not?"
      >
      > In fact, I seriously considered doing so some 25 years ago, but had too 
      > much on the go at the time to get any further than the idea stage. 
      > Nowadays, I'm too darned old and no longer have a workplace large enough 
      > for such a project.
      >
      > However, I wasn't going to skin the a/c with sheet aluminum. Too heavy. 
      > Fabric is lighter and would retain the authentic(?) external appearance. 
      > The intention was to substitute aluminum alloy structural members for the 
      > wooden parts of the original design. These would have
      > been standard extruded sections and formed angles, channels, etc. riveted 
      > or bolted together according to standard aircraft practice.
      >
      > At first I considered an all-aluminum fuselage with fabric covering, but 
      > had settled on a welded steel tubing truss before the whole idea was 
      > shelved. This creation  would have been "all metal" rather than "all 
      > aluminum".
      >
      > A spring steel landing gear was never considered because the highly 
      > localized loads on the structure would have required much 
      > re-design--besides altering the appearance of an airplane that was 
      > supposed to mimic the Pietenpol.
      >
      > The primary motivation for the exercise was to use a substitute material 
      > for scarce (and expensive) aircraft quality spruce; the secondary goal was 
      > to perhaps save some weight. I still regret that I never had the time to 
      > follow it through.
      >
      > Happy New Year!
      >
      > Graham Hansen
      >
      > (My  Pietenpol, CF-AUN, is a standard wooden version)
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      A great long weekend allowed me to just about complete my center section
      and start assembling the left wing.  It's fun to see something "big" for
      a change.  I posted some pictures on my site; they are at the end of the
      Piet Project page.  Still a long way to go!
      
      Happy New Year to all!
      
      Jack
      
      www.textors.com <http://www.textors.com/> 
      
      do not archive
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Landing gear | 
      
      What size are your wheels, Leon? What kind of brakes are you using? Do you
      have a photo available?
      
      I've been thinking about trying to find ATF wheels that are tall and skinny
      enough to look like the old aerowheels.
      
      Happy New Year everyone
      
      Ken in Austin, knocking out walls and pricing capstrips.
      
      
      On Dec 31, 2007 8:18 AM, Leon Stefan <lshutks@webtv.net> wrote:
      
      >
      > I'm not  using spring gear, but have thought of wanting to try it if I
      > ever built a second Piet. The lighter Grove aluminum gear legs would be
      > the thing to use. Probably work best with with a steel tube fus., but
      > with some beefing in the gear box area, I think it would work on the
      > wood fus. also. I think you would have less hours of building time
      > invested with the spring gear,but after all the beefing I don't think
      > you would have much savings in weight. I built the J-3 type gear with
      > Hagar brakes, and Douglass alum. atv. wheels and it is relatively light
      > at 48 lbs. complete. This part is insane and I will never do it, but I
      > would love to build a Piet. in all aluminum. The fus. built like a BD-4.
      > Leon S. in Ks with nothing better to do but day dream because there is
      > another damn artic blast blowing threw again today.
      >
      >
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |