Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:36 AM - Re: Radio Help (Lagowski Morrow)
     2. 06:44 AM - Re: Radio Help (Jim Ash)
     3. 02:37 PM - Re: Radio Help (Steve Ruse)
     4. 04:16 PM - 164 corvair engine (TGSTONE236@aol.com)
     5. 04:25 PM - Fw: 164 corvair engine (TGSTONE236@aol.com)
     6. 04:31 PM - Re: Windshild (jimd)
     7. 04:37 PM - Windshield Size (Lagowski Morrow)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Dick, many thanks for sharing your experience!  I've decided to try the 
      same approach and postpone getting new mags, wiring harness and plugs. 
      
      Where did you put the antenna and ground plane?--Jim Lagowski, NX221PT
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Dick Navratil 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:58 PM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Radio Help
      
      
        Many others will have great suggestions, but I just went thru this 
      problem and found 2 things that made a world of difference.  First, I 
      took of the hand held antenna aninstalles a full sized VHF antenna.  
      Second, I grounded the antenna to a horizontal ground plate, approx 
      24"x18"  
        I went from having so much static that I couldnt communicate more that 
      1/2 mi., to hearing traffic 25+ mi out.
        Dick N.
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: Lagowski Morrow 
          To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
          Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:44 PM
          Subject: Pietenpol-List: Radio Help
      
      
          I just learned that I may have a problem communicating from my Piet 
      that has a 65 Continental with Bendix-Scintilla mags, unshielded wiring 
      and old time ceramic plugs. My intention was to use my handheld radio 
      with a plugged in headset. I have been advised that the static will be 
      so bad that I will basically be unable to communicate. What to do since 
      I will not fly without being able to transmit and receive clearly. I 
      would like to avoid the expense of new mags, shielded wiring and new 
      shielded plugs. I'm about a month away from engine fireup.
      
          Am I stuck with getting new stuff or is there an alternative(s) out 
      there?--Jim Lagowski, NX221PT
      
      
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat
      ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      -----
      
      
        Checked by AVG. 
      5/29/2008 7:27 AM
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I apparently missed this thread and am catching up, so I beg forgiveness if somebody
      has already been through all this.
      
      I went through some radio problems with my Cub like you're trying to prevent. My
      circumstances might have been a bit different becaause the Cub is tubular steel
      construction and it completely surrounds the cockpit, creating a 'Faraday's
      Cage'. It basically cages in the electro-magnetic field from the transmitter.
      For the record, I had no problems (well, negligibly minor, you can hear the
      engine in the headsets, but it ain't bad) from the ignition system. I was using
      the little rubber duckie antenna and stuffing it in the seat pouch in front
      of me, with a DC H10-30 headset and PTT on the stick (and an intercom when I fly
      with a passenger).
      
      The rubber duckie ain't the greatest antenna by design. It's a compromise of convenience
      vs efficiency, with the decision personally favoring convenience a bit
      too much. A perfect antenna will match the frequency you're using, which sounds
      pretty ominous. If the antenna doesn't match the frequency, it loses efficiency
      the further your frequency is from the antenna's natural frequency.
      
      I got an antenna maybe 26-27 inches long (quarter wave), and hooked it up with
      a ground plane. It's mounted above the wing, outside the cage effect. If your
      plane is wood, the effect isn't anywhere near as great, but I have my questions
      about the silver coat on the fabric. 
      
      My antenna isn't anything fancy; it's basically a stretch of stiff wire with an
      insulated mount. I bought a cheap SWR meter for about $30 (15 years ago, when
      I did this), and hooked it up between the radio and the antenna. Your transmitter's
      energy is going two places; radiated RF and heat. No setup is perfect,
      so you'll always  have some heat loss, but the SWR (standing wave ratio) meter
      will help you minimize it. I tuned my radio to the frequency I thought was most
      important to me (121.5), hit the transmit button, and recorded the result shown
      on the SWR. Then I clipped a little (maybe 1/2") off the end of the antenna
      with some wire cutters and checked it again. The loss went down. Shorter antenna
      = higher resonant frequency. The trick is knowing when to stop cutting.
      One of the ways to deal with this is to use a lower frequency than you want and
      cut just past it, then move the frequency up and go again. Your antenna will
      resonate at this frequency either when it's receiving or transmitting, so performing
      this procedure will improve the efficiency of both. 
      
      Note here that when you use the high-end (135 mhz) of the band, your antenna won't
      really be matched to that frequency, so the further you get from the natural
      frequency of your antenna, the worse it's going to get. It will still be waaaay
      better than your rubber duckie.
      
      Also don't forget to use good shielded cable and connectors between the radio and
      the antenna.
      
      Jim Ash
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      >From: Lagowski Morrow <jimdeb@charter.net>
      >Sent: Jun 3, 2008 8:33 AM
      >To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      >Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Radio Help
      >
      >Dick, many thanks for sharing your experience!  I've decided to try the same approach
      and postpone getting new mags, wiring harness and plugs. 
      >
      >Where did you put the antenna and ground plane?--Jim Lagowski, NX221PT
      >  ----- Original Message ----- 
      >  From: Dick Navratil 
      >  To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
      >  Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:58 PM
      >  Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Radio Help
      >
      >
      >  Many others will have great suggestions, but I just went thru this problem and
      found 2 things that made a world of difference.  First, I took of the hand
      held antenna aninstalles a full sized VHF antenna.  Second, I grounded the antenna
      to a horizontal ground plate, approx 24"x18"  
      >  I went from having so much static that I couldnt communicate more that 1/2 mi.,
      to hearing traffic 25+ mi out.
      >  Dick N.
      >    ----- Original Message ----- 
      >    From: Lagowski Morrow 
      >    To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
      >    Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:44 PM
      >    Subject: Pietenpol-List: Radio Help
      >
      >
      >    I just learned that I may have a problem communicating from my Piet that has
      a 65 Continental with Bendix-Scintilla mags, unshielded wiring and old time
      ceramic plugs. My intention was to use my handheld radio with a plugged in headset.
      I have been advised that the static will be so bad that I will basically
      be unable to communicate. What to do since I will not fly without being able
      to transmit and receive clearly. I would like to avoid the expense of new mags,
      shielded wiring and new shielded plugs. I'm about a month away from engine
      fireup.
      >
      >    Am I stuck with getting new stuff or is there an alternative(s) out there?--Jim
      Lagowski, NX221PT
      >
      >
      >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      >href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      >href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      >
      >
      >------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      >
      >
      >  Checked by AVG. 
      >5/29/2008 7:27 AM
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Dick,
      
      Could you please clarify your comment on the ground?  The antenna  
      shouldn't actually be grounded to a plate, right?  What you want to do  
      is attach the coax shielding (the outer braid) to a "ground plane" or  
      plate at the base of the antenna.  The antenna itself and the coax  
      center signal wire should be insulated from everything else,  
      particularly the ground plane.
      
      That is how I installed my antenna, it is on the bottom of the nose,  
      ~30" behind the prop.  It is an 1/8" brass brazing rod, routed through  
      two nylon bushings or "sleeves" that I bought at Home Depot.  It all  
      cost me about $4, and I can transmit up to 125 nautical miles air to  
      air.
      
      I bought an antenna book from RST Engineering for about $10 I believe.  
        It had good and relatively brief and simple explanations on how to  
      build several very effective antennas for aircraft.  The book was very  
      well worth it.  I don't see it on their website, but I'm sure you  
      could call or e-mail them about it.  Three keys that stick in my mind  
      are 1) have a good ground plane 2) the antenna must be the proper  
      length and 3) keep the tip of the antenna away from other metal parts.
      
      http://www.rst-engr.com/
      
      Steve Ruse
      
      Quoting Lagowski Morrow <jimdeb@charter.net>:
      
      > Dick, many thanks for sharing your experience!  I've decided to try   
      > the same approach and postpone getting new mags, wiring harness and   
      > plugs.
      >
      > Where did you put the antenna and ground plane?--Jim Lagowski, NX221PT
      >   ----- Original Message -----
      >   From: Dick Navratil
      >   To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      >   Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:58 PM
      >   Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Radio Help
      >
      >
      >   Many others will have great suggestions, but I just went thru this  
      >  problem and found 2 things that made a world of difference.  First,  
      >  I took of the hand held antenna aninstalles a full sized VHF   
      > antenna.  Second, I grounded the antenna to a horizontal ground   
      > plate, approx 24"x18"
      >   I went from having so much static that I couldnt communicate more   
      > that 1/2 mi., to hearing traffic 25+ mi out.
      >   Dick N.
      >     ----- Original Message -----
      >     From: Lagowski Morrow
      >     To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      >     Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:44 PM
      >     Subject: Pietenpol-List: Radio Help
      >
      >
      >     I just learned that I may have a problem communicating from my   
      > Piet that has a 65 Continental with Bendix-Scintilla mags,   
      > unshielded wiring and old time ceramic plugs. My intention was to   
      > use my handheld radio with a plugged in headset. I have been advised  
      >  that the static will be so bad that I will basically be unable to   
      > communicate. What to do since I will not fly without being able to   
      > transmit and receive clearly. I would like to avoid the expense of   
      > new mags, shielded wiring and new shielded plugs. I'm about a month   
      > away from engine fireup.
      >
      >     Am I stuck with getting new stuff or is there an alternative(s)   
      > out there?--Jim Lagowski, NX221PT
      >
      >
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      >
      >
      >   Checked by AVG.
      > 5/29/2008 7:27 AM
      >
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | 164 corvair engine | 
      
      I just got back to Wilmington NC with a 1964 Corvair 110 hp  motor  that I 
      bought in Lexington NC today. If you are serious about wanting a motor,  Barry
      
      Owens has plenty of the ones we need for aircraft use or otherwise.
      
      here is the information: Barry Owens
                                        Cell  # 336-250-966
                                         358 Dixon St
                                          Lexington NC 27292
      
      hope this may help someone
      
      Ted Stone /at work on Pietenpol 
      
      
      **************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with 
      Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.      
      (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4?&NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | 164 corvair engine | 
      
      Correction I have a 1964 motor and I purchased a 1966 motor from  Barry
      
      
      ____________________________________
       From: TGSTONE236@aol.com
      Sent: 6/3/2008 7:17:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight  Time
      Subj: Pietenpol-List: 164 corvair engine
      
      
      I just got back to Wilmington NC with a 1964 Corvair 110 hp  motor  that I 
      bought in Lexington NC today. If you are serious about wanting a motor,  Barry
      
      Owens has plenty of the ones we need for aircraft use or  otherwise.
      
      here is the information: Barry Owens
                                        Cell  # 336-250-966
                                         358 Dixon St
                                          Lexington NC 27292
      
      hope this may help someone
      
      Ted Stone /at work on Pietenpol 
      
      
      ____________________________________
       Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. _Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" 
      on AOL  Food_ 
      (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4?&NCID=aolfod00030000000002) .
      
      
      (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List) 
      (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) 
      
      
      **************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with 
      Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.      
      (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4?&NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I am at the same stage.. posted a while back and got a lot of pictures but no templates
      or good mounting ideas. Made a windshield, but not too crazy about it.
      
      Could I get the same info? Be nice if it was in some format it could stay on the
      forum and be usable for, but I would be happy with it any way could get it.
      
      Jim
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=186108#186108
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      I measured mine today and they are 9" high and 16" wide on the curve, 
      and mounted at a ~45 degree angle. The size came from experimenting with 
      my hand around the edges of my motorcycle windshield at 65mph.--Jim 
      Lagowski-- cabanes and center section of the wing installed today
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |