Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Mon 06/23/08


Total Messages Posted: 86



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:15 AM - Re: Re: adding a baggage compartment (Clif Dawson)
     2. 04:47 AM - Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding edges (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
     3. 05:06 AM - kitty litter (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
     4. 05:07 AM - Re: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding edges (Peter W Johnson)
     5. 05:19 AM - Re: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding edges (Glenn Thomas)
     6. 05:35 AM - Re: kitty litter (Rick Holland)
     7. 05:36 AM - raspy metal plane (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
     8. 05:43 AM - center section baggage---I removed the center ribs (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
     9. 05:53 AM - True dat! (Jeff Boatright)
    10. 06:02 AM - Re: Re: adding a baggage compartment (Phillips, Jack)
    11. 06:03 AM - Cross Country in a Piet (Oscar Zuniga)
    12. 06:09 AM -  (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
    13. 06:13 AM - Re: kitty litter (Bill Church)
    14. 06:14 AM - The Great Waldo Pepper (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
    15. 06:17 AM - correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
    16. 06:22 AM - Re:  (Jeff Boatright)
    17. 06:22 AM - created (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
    18. 06:24 AM - Re: correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable (HelsperSew@aol.com)
    19. 06:26 AM - Randy Bruce (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
    20. 06:28 AM - Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) (Bill Church)
    21. 06:36 AM - Re: correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable (Bill Church)
    22. 06:42 AM - Re: The Great Waldo Pepper (AMsafetyC@aol.com)
    23. 06:49 AM - Re: correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable (HelsperSew@aol.com)
    24. 06:53 AM - Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) (Glenn Thomas)
    25. 06:53 AM - Re: Cross Country in a Piet (AMsafetyC@aol.com)
    26. 07:14 AM - Re: The Great Waldo Pepper (John Hofmann)
    27. 07:15 AM - Re: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) (Gary Boothe)
    28. 07:20 AM - Re: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) (Phillips, Jack)
    29. 07:31 AM - Re: correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable (Bill Church)
    30. 07:34 AM - Re: The Great Waldo Pepper (AMsafetyC@aol.com)
    31. 07:46 AM - Re: adding a baggage compartment (rubber314chicken)
    32. 07:49 AM - Re: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) (Bill Church)
    33. 07:55 AM - Re: adding a baggage compartment (rubber314chicken)
    34. 07:58 AM - Re: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) (Phillips, Jack)
    35. 08:00 AM - Re: Re: adding a baggage compartment (Phillips, Jack)
    36. 08:00 AM - Jack's photo of blocks in the horiz. tail (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
    37. 08:04 AM - Size of longerons and tailbrace wires (HelsperSew@aol.com)
    38. 08:05 AM - Re: adding a baggage compartment (rubber314chicken)
    39. 08:14 AM - Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) (Glenn Thomas)
    40. 08:18 AM - Re: Re: adding a baggage compartment (Jeff Boatright)
    41. 08:20 AM - When the fat lady sings (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
    42. 08:21 AM - Re: The Great Waldo Pepper (wayne@taildraggersinc.com)
    43. 08:22 AM - Re: R/C Pietenpol Kit for trade! (wayne@taildraggersinc.com)
    44. 09:40 AM - Re: R/C Pietenpol Kit for trade! (Brian Kraut)
    45. 09:41 AM - Re: Re: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding edges (Joe Krzes)
    46. 09:56 AM - Re: R/C Pietenpol Kit for trade! (rubber314chicken)
    47. 09:56 AM - Need engine info (Robert Butsch)
    48. 10:11 AM - Re: Need engine info (RAMPEYBOY@aol.com)
    49. 10:20 AM - Re: Need engine info (John Hofmann)
    50. 10:50 AM - Re: adding a baggage compartment (RBush96589@aol.com)
    51. 10:53 AM - WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (outofthebox50@yahoo.com)
    52. 11:04 AM - WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC])
    53. 11:09 AM - Re: Re: adding a baggage compartment (Phillips, Jack)
    54. 11:13 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (Phillips, Jack)
    55. 11:13 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (airlion@bellsouth.net)
    56. 11:20 AM - Re: Re: adding a baggage compartment (airlion@bellsouth.net)
    57. 11:23 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (Robert Gow)
    58. 11:23 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (Phillips, Jack)
    59. 11:24 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (Dave Abramson)
    60. 11:36 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (airlion@bellsouth.net)
    61. 11:41 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (TOM STINEMETZE)
    62. 11:43 AM - Re: Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (Dortch, Steven D MAJ NG NG FORSCOM)
    63. 11:43 AM - Re: Re: adding a baggage compartment (airlion@bellsouth.net)
    64. 11:53 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (airlion@bellsouth.net)
    65. 11:55 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (airlion@bellsouth.net)
    66. 11:57 AM - Re: Re: adding a baggage compartment (John Hofmann)
    67. 11:58 AM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (John Hofmann)
    68. 12:00 PM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (John Hofmann)
    69. 12:01 PM - Re: Re: adding a baggage compartment (John Hofmann)
    70. 12:02 PM - Re: Size of longerons and tailbrace wires (Bill Church)
    71. 12:04 PM - blank (airlion@bellsouth.net)
    72. 12:06 PM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (TOM STINEMETZE)
    73. 12:22 PM - Re: blank (outofthebox50@yahoo.com)
    74. 12:23 PM - Re: adding a baggage compartment (rubber314chicken)
    75. 12:49 PM - Re: blank (Brian Kraut)
    76. 12:52 PM - Re: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding edges (Glenn Thomas)
    77. 02:17 PM - flying to brodhead (RBush96589@aol.com)
    78. 02:49 PM - Re: The Great Waldo Pepper (Don Emch)
    79. 05:06 PM - Re: flying to brodhead (airlion@bellsouth.net)
    80. 05:25 PM - Re: flying to brodhead (John Hofmann)
    81. 06:56 PM - Re: The Great Waldo Pepper (Darrel Jones)
    82. 07:04 PM - Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? (Darrel Jones)
    83. 08:05 PM - Re: The Great Waldo Pepper (John Hofmann)
    84. 08:35 PM - Re: The Great Waldo Pepper (John Hofmann)
    85. 09:30 PM - Re: Cross Country in a Piet (Clif Dawson)
    86. 11:35 PM - Re: The Great Waldo Pepper (Clif Dawson)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:15:53 AM PST US
    From: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    50lb??!! Spruce is officialy listed at 31 lb/cubic foot. Western Hemlock-29, Douglas Fir-34. Those are three of a fairly long list of useable woods. Clif > <rubber314chicken@gmail.com> > >(such as spruce being 50lbs/ft^3 and so forth) > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Checked by AVG. 7:52 AM


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:47:53 AM PST US
    Subject: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding edges
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    In the spirit of the late homebuilt technical writer Antonio Bingelis I'd like to pass along a very useful and inexpensive tool that helped me countless time during building. http://www.amazon.com/Stanley-21-296-Surform-Plane-Regular/dp/B00002X1ZL I only had (still have) the Pocket Plane (scroll down just a bit on the Amazon page) and it helped me round my tailfeather leading edge surfaces (so you don't have that square look..unless you prefer that), the fuselage fairings, the wood landing gear legs---you name it. This is a fantastic tool that lasts forever and you'll save a zillion bucks (okay, maybe just $30 to 80) on coarse sandpaper. These things don't gouge like regular planes and they make very cool curlie-cue strips for your daughters hamster cage. An awesome tool that can't be beat for the price and worth in building a Pietenpol ! Mike C. Stanley Stockholder (this part isn't true)


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:06:32 AM PST US
    Subject: kitty litter
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Despite my desire to not post on this subject, I find my self control lacking at the moment. I've dropped created remains and they look most like kitty litter, of course I don't have the expert credentials that some on the list might.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:07:11 AM PST US
    From: "Peter W Johnson" <vk3eka@bigpond.net.au>
    Subject: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding
    edges Mike, I used one of them and a Stanley rip saw to make my first (and presently, only) prop. Don't leave home without one. Peter Wonthaggi Australia http://www.cpc-world.com <http://www.cpc-world.com/> (with a couple of new pictures and video!) _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC] Sent: Monday, 23 June 2008 9:44 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding edges In the spirit of the late homebuilt technical writer Antonio Bingelis I'd like to pass along a very useful and inexpensive tool that helped me countless time during building. <http://www.amazon.com/Stanley-21-296-Surform-Plane-Regular/dp/B00002X1ZL> http://www.amazon.com/Stanley-21-296-Surform-Plane-Regular/dp/B00002X1ZL I only had (still have) the Pocket Plane (scroll down just a bit on the Amazon page) and it helped me round my tailfeather leading edge surfaces (so you don't have that square look..unless you prefer that), the fuselage fairings, the wood landing gear legs---you name it. This is a fantastic tool that lasts forever and you'll save a zillion bucks (okay, maybe just $30 to 80) on coarse sandpaper. These things don't gouge like regular planes and they make very cool curlie-cue strips for your daughters hamster cage. An awesome tool that can't be beat for the price and worth in building a Pietenpol ! Mike C. Stanley Stockholder (this part isn't true)


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:19:23 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding
    edges
    From: "Glenn Thomas" <glennthomas@flyingwood.com>
    I have a little pocket plane and will be using that after seeing how hard it is to control a router cut. Were you referring to the raspy looking fella (Surform Plane - Regular) as well? You're right. It's cheap. Also, on the topic of stabilizer construction, I am worried that if I put the stringers in on one side (to guarantee that it stays good'n flat) the slight bend at the LE will cause a warp and when I flip it, and the aggregate pull by all of those (8 on one side) stringers will be difficult to combat. But if I glue them in as a top and bottom pair out of the jig, I won't be able to guarantee the flatness. Ideas? Am I being a worrywort again? It is perfectly true out of the jig so it might not be an issue to go with the second idea. Thanks -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189245#189245


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:35:51 AM PST US
    From: "Rick Holland" <at7000ft@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: kitty litter
    Yep, the confirmation we have all been waiting for, on Modern Marvels on History channel last night "Corpse Tech", confirms that cremated remains are just crushed bone. They even showed the bone crusher in action (kind of like a big coffee grinder). My last post on the subject too. Rick On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC] < michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> wrote: > Despite my desire to not post on this subject, I find my self control > lacking at the moment. I've dropped created > remains and they look most like kitty litter, of course I don't have the > expert credentials that some on the list might. > > > * > > * > > -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:36:16 AM PST US
    Subject: raspy metal plane
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    That's it Glenn, the raspy looking ones. They come in curved shapes, flat, longer, shorter--you name it. Work great for contouring or evening up glue joints then you can transition to grades of sandpaper to suite your finish desires. Regarding staying true you'll be amazed at how flexible the horizontal stabilizer is sitting on the bench BUT.....when you attach the cables to it on the fuselage and true it up then with your turnbuckles you'll be amazed at how strong it will become. (still you don't want to use it to pickup the tail and move the plane around, least I don't) Wings are the same way. They are SO flexible when completed you wondered why you were so particular about building it flat and keeping everything level (still smart tho). Mike C.


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:43:01 AM PST US
    Subject: center section baggage---I removed the center ribs
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    To open up your space in there even more, omit the center ribs.


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:53:22 AM PST US
    From: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>
    Subject: True dat!
    Mike, Speaking of truing things up, what is your preferred method of truing the tail members? In the past, we've just done it by eye. We level the fuselage by putting the tailwheel on a stool, and then eyeball the plane from aft, turning turnbuckles until the vertical stab was vertical and the horizontal planes horizontal. I don't see any reason to change that, but I'm always curious to see how others do things. Jeff -- --- Jeffrey H. Boatright, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Ophthalmology Emory University School of Medicine Editor-in-Chief Molecular Vision


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:02:42 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>
    If you can load 450 lbs into a Pietenpol and still get 85 to 100 mph out of it, you are some kind of magician! The only time I've seen 85 mph on my airspeed indicator, the forward view was very green (trees, grass etc - no sky in sight). Sounds like you have some fairly unrealistic expectations for the Pietenpol. Pietenpols are wonderful airplanes, but they are not fast, they don't have much baggage space, they are not particularly comfortable, and they are not particularly economical to fly ON A TRIP. If I am going out to bore holes in the sky, I fly the Pietenpol because it only burns 4-1/2 gallons an hour. If I'm going on a trip and want to save money on gas, I fly my RV-4 because it only burns 8 gallons an hour and goes 180 miles in that hour, where the Pietenpol would have only covered 65 or so. It would be cheaper, easier and more comfortable to fly the RV-4 (4 hours flying time each way) to Brodhead next month, but I will fly the Pietenpol (16 hours each way, wx permitting) because it is more fun. Jack Phillips NX899JP Raleigh, NC -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of rubber314chicken Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 2:44 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: adding a baggage compartment <rubber314chicken@gmail.com> then what plane would you recommend that meets LSA, is all wood, cruises it at about 85-100 mph (more would be good, but I really just want 85+), can be built in a garage (unfortunately, that eliminates the jodel designs because of the one piece wing), and is economical to build and fly. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189095#189095 _________________________________________________ or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:03:26 AM PST US
    From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Cross Country in a Piet
    Poth? Poth! That's just outside of San Antonio and not too goshawful far from Cannon Field, home of the Liaison Pilots Association. I've never seen "The Great Waldo Pepper" but I guess I should rent it one of these days... Oscar Zuniga Air Camper NX41CC San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:09:27 AM PST US
    Subject:
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Some will cringe Jeff but I measure the distance to the hangar floor from the bottom LE and TE of my horizontal stabilizer and adjust the turnbuckles until the measurements agree from side to side and the tension on the (in my case 1/8" diam) cables feels about right. Mike C.


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:13:48 AM PST US
    From: "Bill Church" <eng@canadianrogers.com>
    Subject: kitty litter
    Mike, You've dropped "created remains" and they look most like kitty litter? Maybe these remains were "created" by a cat. Or did you just forget the "m" in cremated. Oh, that makes more sense. Never mind... do not archive BC _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 8:04 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: kitty litter Despite my desire to not post on this subject, I find my self control lacking at the moment. I've dropped created remains and they look most like kitty litter, of course I don't have the expert credentials that some on the list might.


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:14:06 AM PST US
    Subject: The Great Waldo Pepper
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Oscar, I read with utter amazement and disillusionment that you admitted to having never seen The Great Waldo Pepper ? Your life will not be complete until you see that. You can find cheap DVD copies on Amazon. Mike C.


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:17:40 AM PST US
    Subject: correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Only used 1/8" on X bracing between struts and wood gear and to bellcrank for elevator, everything else is 3/32" Mike C.


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:22:13 AM PST US
    From: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>
    Subject: Re: tenpol-List:
    Mike, Thanks for the insight. I guess your and our gear set in planes that are perfectly parallel to that of our wings! It probably doesn't matter a whole lot, as long as you don't go cork-screwing through the air. Jeff At 8:07 AM -0500 6/23/08, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC] wrote: >(GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> > > >Some will cringe Jeff but I measure the distance to the hangar floor >from >the bottom LE and TE of my horizontal stabilizer and adjust the >turnbuckles >until the measurements agree from side to side and the tension on the >(in my >case 1/8" diam) cables feels about right. > >Mike C. -- --- Jeffrey H. Boatright, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Ophthalmology Emory University School of Medicine Editor-in-Chief Molecular Vision


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:22:13 AM PST US
    Subject: created
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Bill, The created remains from a cat look much different ! And those remains stop showing up in our flower beds once the cat is dead. Even better. Mike C. do not archive


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:24:02 AM PST US
    From: HelsperSew@aol.com
    Subject: Re: correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable
    Hi Guys, Last year I looked closely at "The Last Original" Piet at Brodhead. Bernard used 1/16" tail brace wires. He also cut down the longeron dimension to 7/8" wide. I was surprised to see that. Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:26:26 AM PST US
    Subject: Randy Bruce
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Last I heard Larry Williams was the closest contact to Randy. (and Larry is a retired airline pilot now living in Arkansas on a residential air strip association of some kind) Randy did show up in 2007 at Brodhead and I spoke with him. Great guy if you can find him. He's somewhat of a freelance artist I believe and last Larry told me Randy was living on a houseboat in Florida. You might want to search the archives for Judge Ted Brousseau as well (retired, that is) in Naples as I believe he is buddies with Randy as well. Report back if you can track him down ! Mike C.


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:28:04 AM PST US
    From: "Bill Church" <eng@canadianrogers.com>
    Subject: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers)
    Glenn, As I am just ahead of you in the construction process, this is an issue that I recently faced. Don't worry about it. There's such a small amount of curvature in the stringers, that "pull" is inconsequential. I thought about removing the stab from the jig so that I could install the stringers on top and bottom at the same time, so that they would balance each other, but decided against it. I reasoned that if I kept it in the jig (on a flat table) that at least that would ensure a warp-free installation on one side, but if I removed it from the jig, the stab would be free to twist wherever it pleased. But I don't think either method would result in any real difference that couldn't be corrected by cable tension. So, to answer your question, yes, you're being a worrywort again. Just like the rest of us. Bill C.


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:36:19 AM PST US
    From: "Bill Church" <eng@canadianrogers.com>
    Subject: correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable
    Dan, How did you get to see the longeron dimension? And was it 7/8" square or 7/8" x 1"? Bill C.


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:42:51 AM PST US
    From: AMsafetyC@aol.com
    Subject: Re: The Great Waldo Pepper
    Some might say it is the greatest film in aviation, I would not. I would say it is the greatest film since the invention of the airplane! In a message dated 6/23/2008 9:14:41 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov writes: --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> Oscar, I read with utter amazement and disillusionment that you admitted to having never seen The Great Waldo Pepper ? Your life will not be complete until you see that. You can find cheap DVD copies on Amazon. Mike C. **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:49:19 AM PST US
    From: HelsperSew@aol.com
    Subject: Re: correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable
    Bill, I just looked inside at the cockpit area. To the best of my recollection, the longerons were 7/8" wide x 1" high. Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:53:01 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers)
    From: "Glenn Thomas" <glennthomas@flyingwood.com>
    Thanks Bill, Seeing how it took me over 4 months to get the stabilizer almost done, I really fret about things that could flip the applecart in the last couple of steps. The type of warp I'm worried about with the leading edge of the stabilizer can't be "adjusted out" with the bracing wires which is where my question was aiming. I guess since you didn't end up with any kind of warp, it is probably something you can address right in the flat jig. Another idea I had that is probably very easy to set up is to use the wall of my garage as the flat plane and building a jig right on the wall. My garage isn't insulated so I have the open bays between studs to get at both sides of the stab. Can't wait to get home and see if there is a clear spot that I can size up for this approach. -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189284#189284


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:53:38 AM PST US
    From: AMsafetyC@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Cross Country in a Piet
    Oscar go ahead and rent it actually you should buy it, there is just t much to be learned about life in it. "And if you really don't like it I'll give you another ride for free" In a message dated 6/23/2008 9:03:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, taildrags@hotmail.com writes: --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags@hotmail.com> Poth? Poth! That's just outside of San Antonio and not too goshawful far from Cannon Field, home of the Liaison Pilots Association. I've never seen "The Great Waldo Pepper" but I guess I should rent it one of these days... Oscar Zuniga Air Camper NX41CC San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:14:36 AM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: The Great Waldo Pepper
    I too was shocked to read of Oscar's plight. I mean does he not know that =93Some people would say that what you are about to see, is probably the greatest exhibition of aeronautical skill in the history of world. I myself, wouldn=92t go that far. It is probably only the greatest since the invention of the aeroplane.=94 Axel Olsson - The Stunt King John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com On Jun 23, 2008, at 8:11 AM, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC] wrote: > [ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> > > > Oscar, > > I read with utter amazement and disillusionment that you admitted to > having never > seen The Great Waldo Pepper ? Your life will not be complete until > you > see that. > You can find cheap DVD copies on Amazon. > > Mike C. > >


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:15:40 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers)
    Glenn, My Dad died on March 7th this year (a Friday night) and I started my Piet that Saturday morning. My understanding wife left me alone all weekend as I buried myself in the tail section. Between the tears and the memories, I was able to build all six pieces in two very long days (I am fortunate to have all his shop equipment). The method I used was to glue the frame work, add the gussets and let all dry overnight. The next day I added the stringers, but saw no tendency for them to pull anything out of alignment. The spars appear to be plenty strong to resist any pull. Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done, working on fuselage (10 ribs down.) -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Thomas Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 6:50 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) <glennthomas@flyingwood.com> Thanks Bill, Seeing how it took me over 4 months to get the stabilizer almost done, I really fret about things that could flip the applecart in the last couple of steps. The type of warp I'm worried about with the leading edge of the stabilizer can't be "adjusted out" with the bracing wires which is where my question was aiming. I guess since you didn't end up with any kind of warp, it is probably something you can address right in the flat jig. Another idea I had that is probably very easy to set up is to use the wall of my garage as the flat plane and building a jig right on the wall. My garage isn't insulated so I have the open bays between studs to get at both sides of the stab. Can't wait to get home and see if there is a clear spot that I can size up for this approach. -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189284#189284


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:20:33 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers)
    From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>
    As I recall (we're talking about trying to remember something I did nearly 10 years ago) when I made the jig for my stabilizer, I added blocks of wood to raise the spars and leading and trailing edges the appropriate height to clear the ribs when the stabilizer was assembled. Since BHP decided to make the spar, the LE and the TE all different thicknesses, it took some doing to build a jig that allowed the stabilizer to be assembled in plane. I added small blocks of spruce between the rib capstrips at the point about halfway between the spar and the trailing edge to help hold the rib capstrips apart. I've attached a couple of pictures showing the jig setup and the little blocks in place separating the capstrips. I don't know if the blocks are really necessary, but It was nice to be able to tighten up the ribstitching in that area without worryng about distorting the ribs. In the picture "Assembling the Stabilizer" you can see how I shimmed up the assembly in the jig to bring everything into plane. In "Assembled Elevator" you can see a good view of the rib blocks in between the capstrips. And no laughing about how much more grey hair I have now than I did in that picture! Jack Phillips NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Thomas Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:50 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) <glennthomas@flyingwood.com> Thanks Bill, Seeing how it took me over 4 months to get the stabilizer almost done, I really fret about things that could flip the applecart in the last couple of steps. The type of warp I'm worried about with the leading edge of the stabilizer can't be "adjusted out" with the bracing wires which is where my question was aiming. I guess since you didn't end up with any kind of warp, it is probably something you can address right in the flat jig. Another idea I had that is probably very easy to set up is to use the wall of my garage as the flat plane and building a jig right on the wall. My garage isn't insulated so I have the open bays between studs to get at both sides of the stab. Can't wait to get home and see if there is a clear spot that I can size up for this approach. -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189284#189284 _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is p rohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N orsk - Portuguese


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:31:22 AM PST US
    From: "Bill Church" <eng@canadianrogers.com>
    Subject: correction---tailbrace cables are 3/32" cable
    Dan, Oh, sure, I guess if you want to do things the easy way, you could just look inside the cockpit area. Why didn't I think of that? Bonus points for you for thinking to measure the size of the longerons. Bill C.


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:34:13 AM PST US
    From: AMsafetyC@aol.com
    Subject: Re: The Great Waldo Pepper
    I see a trend emerging, as we have Jim Markle as the unofficial, official Pietenpol ambassador, we are once again graced with the fine works of John Hofmann as TGWP officinado, truly and expert in his field. John, you do gre at work, I look forward to meeting you next month. Your commentary of last nig ht certainly brought laughter to my tired worn and weary self. I for one applaud you knowledge and greater than appropriate application of TGWP to the occasion. Thanks John a real pleasure to watch a master of the art for at work. Is that all you intend to do for the rest of your life is rides for cash? John In a message dated 6/23/2008 10:15:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com writes: I too was shocked to read of Oscar's plight. I mean does he not know that =9C Some people would say that what you are about to see, is probably the great est exhibition of aeronautical skill in the history of world. I myself, wouldn =99t go that far. It is probably only the greatest since the invention of the aeroplane.=9D Axel Olsson - The Stunt King John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: _jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com_ (mailto:jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com) On Jun 23, 2008, at 8:11 AM, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC] wrote: <_michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov_ (mailto:michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov) > Oscar, I read with utter amazement and disillusionment that you admitted to having never seen The Great Waldo Pepper ? Your life will not be complete until you see that. You can find cheap DVD copies on Amazon. Mike C. - The --> _http://www.matr &n - &nbs --> http://www.matronics.com/co================ _ (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050 000000007)


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:46:13 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    From: "rubber314chicken" <rubber314chicken@gmail.com>
    CDAWSON5854(at)shaw.ca wrote: > 50lb??!! Spruce is officialy listed at 31 lb/cubic foot. > Western Hemlock-29, Douglas Fir-34. Those are > three of a fairly long list of useable woods. > > Clif > I know, but I also wanted to add in for unknowns, variations in the wood, and T-88 used. and Jack, I'm seeing 100 as max level speed, sou wouldn't 85 be resonable at solo weight? and I was expecting a bit of a drop at gross, but not down to 65ish. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189301#189301


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:49:06 AM PST US
    From: "Bill Church" <eng@canadianrogers.com>
    Subject: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers)
    Jack, No comments about the color of your hair, but what the heck were you wiping all over the front of your workbench? Grecian formula perhaps? By the way, I used the same method of shimming the various thicknesses of spar, leading and trailing edges in the jig. I think maybe I'll add some of those rib blocks between the capstrips. Probably not really necessary, but the capstrips do have a bit of flex, as-is. Bill C.


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:55:48 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    From: "rubber314chicken" <rubber314chicken@gmail.com>
    rubber314chicken wrote: > > CDAWSON5854(at)shaw.ca wrote: > > 50lb??!! Spruce is officialy listed at 31 lb/cubic foot. > > Western Hemlock-29, Douglas Fir-34. Those are > > three of a fairly long list of useable woods. > > > > Clif > > > > I know, but I also wanted to add in for unknowns, variations in the wood, and T-88 used. > > and Jack, I'm seeing 100 as max level speed, so wouldn't 85 be resonable at solo weight? and I was expecting a bit of a drop at gross, but not down to 65ish. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189304#189304


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:58:06 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers)
    From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>
    That was excess resorcinol glue (BTW, the ONLY glue the FAA approves for wooden aircraft construction) Pretty, isn't it? I did use T-88 in the cockpit area, or anywhere it showed except for laminations, like my laminated landing gear struts. Jack _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Church Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:46 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers) Jack, No comments about the color of your hair, but what the heck were you wiping all over the front of your workbench? Grecian formula perhaps? By the way, I used the same method of shimming the various thicknesses of spar, leading and trailing edges in the jig. I think maybe I'll add some of those rib blocks between the capstrips. Probably not really necessary, but the capstrips do have a bit of flex, as-is. Bill C. This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any o ther use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Fr ancais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese - Svenska: w ww.cardinalhealth.com/legal/email


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:00:02 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>
    100 is pretty close to Vne for a Pietenpol. Mine has a 65 hp Continental, and I see a cruise speed of about 65 mph solo, maybe 62 at Gross. Top speed is about 72 indicated. You might get 100 mph indicated in cruise on a Pietenpol with a Pratt & Whitney R-985 on it. There's a lot of drag inherent to the design that you simply can't overcome. Jack -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of rubber314chicken Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:44 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: adding a baggage compartment <rubber314chicken@gmail.com> CDAWSON5854(at)shaw.ca wrote: > 50lb??!! Spruce is officialy listed at 31 lb/cubic foot. > Western Hemlock-29, Douglas Fir-34. Those are > three of a fairly long list of useable woods. > > Clif > I know, but I also wanted to add in for unknowns, variations in the wood, and T-88 used. and Jack, I'm seeing 100 as max level speed, sou wouldn't 85 be resonable at solo weight? and I was expecting a bit of a drop at gross, but not down to 65ish. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189301#189301


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:00:10 AM PST US
    Subject: Jack's photo of blocks in the horiz. tail
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    An EXCELLENT point to not forget to glue in those blocks between the horizontal tail rib strips. Fabric taughtening plus rib stitching can crush those strips if not reinforced as shown ala Phillips. Mike C. I miss rib stitching. Knit one, pearl two....


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:04:45 AM PST US
    From: HelsperSew@aol.com
    Subject: Size of longerons and tailbrace wires
    Bill, I was inspecting very closely that "Last Original" because to me, that is the "final word" on acceptable design standards by the master himself. Based on what I saw, I am still planning to use 1/16" cable on the tail feathers (unless I chicken out and use 3/32"). Does anyone have an opinion on this? With some anecdotal or actual evidence? Obviously this airplane has been flying for quite sometime with no ill affects. Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)


    Message 38


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:05:39 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    From: "rubber314chicken" <rubber314chicken@gmail.com>
    Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal wrote: > 100 is pretty close to Vne for a Pietenpol. Mine has a 65 hp > Continental, and I see a cruise speed of about 65 mph solo, maybe 62 at > Gross. Top speed is about 72 indicated. > > You might get 100 mph indicated in cruise on a Pietenpol with a Pratt & > Whitney R-985 on it. > > There's a lot of drag inherent to the design that you simply can't > overcome. > > Jack > -- that might explain the difference. I've read 104 for Vne (although it differs I'm sure) and with a corvair (110ish) in there I'm sure I could cruise a bit faster than 65, and still have a good fuel economy. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189309#189309


    Message 39


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:14:33 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Stab stringers (was Stanley Surform planers)
    From: "Glenn Thomas" <glennthomas@flyingwood.com>
    Thanks again, Gary that's a sad story with an amazing outcome. At least you had a good place to focus on, and focus you did! These projects provide some great reflective quiet time. Jack, I did mine pretty much the same way you did yours, shimming every part to the appropriate plane prior to assembly. At this point the stabilizer is done, less the stringers. My worry was that as the stringers (from rear to front) curve over the main spar down to where they are glued to the tapered-down leading edge, that small amount of spring to achieve a curve will result in a tendency to bow the leading edge when the stab comes out of the jig with 8 stringers on one side, the bow most severe in the center. I may simply be overestimating the strength of the stringers here. They are stronger and less plyable in my hands than I thought they'd be. I will revisit tonight. Great pictures. Are they up on Chris Tracy's site? They do a really good job of showing the approach you took. Thanks guys for all the help on this. -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189315#189315


    Message 40


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:18:33 AM PST US
    From: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    We get 90 mph (checked by GPS) when running flat-out with a C-85 at gross. BUT, It is absolutely flat-out and NOT FUN. These planes seem to like flying at 80 mph or under. For ours, 70-75 is just about perfect. At 10:56 AM -0400 6/23/08, Phillips, Jack wrote: ><Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com> > >100 is pretty close to Vne for a Pietenpol. Mine has a 65 hp >Continental, and I see a cruise speed of about 65 mph solo, maybe 62 at >Gross. Top speed is about 72 indicated. > >You might get 100 mph indicated in cruise on a Pietenpol with a Pratt & >Whitney R-985 on it. > >There's a lot of drag inherent to the design that you simply can't >overcome. > >Jack > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com >[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of >rubber314chicken >Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:44 AM >To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: adding a baggage compartment > ><rubber314chicken@gmail.com> > > >CDAWSON5854(at)shaw.ca wrote: >> 50lb??!! Spruce is officialy listed at 31 lb/cubic foot. >> Western Hemlock-29, Douglas Fir-34. Those are >> three of a fairly long list of useable woods. >> >> Clif >> > >I know, but I also wanted to add in for unknowns, variations in the >wood, and T-88 used. > >and Jack, I'm seeing 100 as max level speed, sou wouldn't 85 be >resonable at solo weight? and I was expecting a bit of a drop at gross, >but not down to 65ish. > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189301#189301 > > -- _____________________________________________________________ Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD Associate Professor, Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA Senior Editor, Molecular Vision, http://www.molvis.org/molvis mailto:jboatri@emory.edu


    Message 41


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:20:11 AM PST US
    Subject: When the fat lady sings
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    I agree with Jack on the 100 mph Vne speed as I've only had mine to a max of 90 a few times (doing low-level inspections of grass runways for errant ground hog holes) and the fat lady started to sing at about 85 to 90.


    Message 42


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:21:43 AM PST US
    From: wayne@taildraggersinc.com
    Subject: The Great Waldo Pepper
    All, You know she's the one to marry when your girlfriend buys you The Great Waldo Pepper on DVD for Christmas, after searching for almost a year to find a copy, and she pays a premium for it, to boot! I love my wife! Oh, and Oscar, you NEED to see this movie. It's only like the best aviation movie of all time! I still laugh every time Robert Redford takes a tomato to the back of the head!!! :) -Wayne Bressler www.taildraggersinc.com www.generalaviationnation.com


    Message 43


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:22:41 AM PST US
    From: wayne@taildraggersinc.com
    Subject: R/C Pietenpol Kit for trade!
    Hey Piet-listers, I have in my posession an old House of Balsa remote controlled Pietenpol kit. New in the box, completely unstarted. I don't really think I'll ever build it, and I think I just had a genius idea... I would like to "trade" it for the complete set of Aircamper drawing from Andrew Pietenpol. I realize, that's a complicated proposition, but if anyone has a new, unused set of plans that they'd be interested in trading, I'm all ears! If someone would like to have this kit, but doesn't have a set of plans to trade, that's OK, too. I will use the money to buy the plans myself. The complete set of plans from Andrew is $158 shipped. I have been advertising this kit on RCGroups.com for $135 plus shipping, which would probably be $10-15. I have pictures of the kit on that site, but here are some basic specs for you: Wingspan: 65" Wing Area: 715 sq in Weight: 4.5 to 5.5 lbs Wing Loading: 14.5 - 17.7 oz/sq ft Engine: .19 - .35 cu in Radio Req'd: 2-3 Channel If anyone is interested, please e-mail me off list at the address below. Here's the link to the pictures: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=882303 I've been a list member for a few years, but still haven't bought the plans. I enjoy the banter back and forth, and have gained a lot of knowledge from the discussions on this list. I appreciate everyone's input here, this is probably the best e-mail list going. Thanks, -Wayne Bressler wayne@taildraggersinc.com www.taildraggersinc.com www.generalaviationnation.com Do Not Archive


    Message 44


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:40:01 AM PST US
    From: "Brian Kraut" <brian.kraut@engalt.com>
    Subject: R/C Pietenpol Kit for trade!
    Just scale up the plans you have and use spruce instead of balsa and you should be good to go! Brian Kraut Engineering Alternatives, Inc. www.engalt.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of wayne@taildraggersinc.com Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 11:20 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: R/C Pietenpol Kit for trade! Hey Piet-listers, I have in my posession an old House of Balsa remote controlled Pietenpol kit. New in the box, completely unstarted. I don't really think I'll ever build it, and I think I just had a genius idea... I would like to "trade" it for the complete set of Aircamper drawing from Andrew Pietenpol. I realize, that's a complicated proposition, but if anyone has a new, unused set of plans that they'd be interested in trading, I'm all ears! If someone would like to have this kit, but doesn't have a set of plans to trade, that's OK, too. I will use the money to buy the plans myself. The complete set of plans from Andrew is $158 shipped. I have been advertising this kit on RCGroups.com for $135 plus shipping, which would probably be $10-15. I have pictures of the kit on that site, but here are some basic specs for you: Wingspan: 65" Wing Area: 715 sq in Weight: 4.5 to 5.5 lbs Wing Loading: 14.5 - 17.7 oz/sq ft Engine: .19 - .35 cu in Radio Req'd: 2-3 Channel If anyone is interested, please e-mail me off list at the address below. Here's the link to the pictures: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=882303 I've been a list member for a few years, but still haven't bought the plans. I enjoy the banter back and forth, and have gained a lot of knowledge from the discussions on this list. I appreciate everyone's input here, this is probably the best e-mail list going. Thanks, -Wayne Bressler wayne@taildraggersinc.com www.taildraggersinc.com www.generalaviationnation.com Do Not Archive


    Message 45


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:41:29 AM PST US
    From: Joe Krzes <jkrzes@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding
    edges Glen, Don't know if this is still an issue, but the following link (hope it wor ks) shows how I did it. Basically took the horizontal stabililzer out of t he jig, stood it on end, glued the stringers trailing edges and middle on b oth sides, dried overnight, glued and clamped leading edges of stringers. The link shows pictures (excuse the poor quality) http://joe.krzes.googlepages.com/elevpg6.htm > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding edges> From: glennthomas@flyingwood.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05 :16:39 -0700> To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com> > Also, on the topic of sta bilizer construction, I am worried that if I put the stringers in on one si de (to guarantee that it stays good'n flat) the slight bend at the LE will cause a warp and when I flip it, and the aggregate pull by all of those (8 on one side) stringers will be difficult to combat. But if I glue them in a s a top and bottom pair out of the jig, I won't be able to guarantee the fl atness. Ideas? Am I being a worrywort again? It is perfectly true out of th e jig so it might not be an issue to go with the second idea. > > Thanks> > --------> Glenn Thomas> N?????> http://www.flyingwood.com> > > > > Read th is topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=1892 ==========> > > _________________________________________________________________ Earn cashback on your purchases with Live Search - the search that pays you back! http://search.live.com/cashback/?&pkw=form=MIJAAF/publ=HMTGL/crea=e arncashback


    Message 46


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:56:09 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: R/C Pietenpol Kit for trade!
    From: "rubber314chicken" <rubber314chicken@gmail.com>
    brian.kraut(at)engalt.com wrote: > Just scale up the plans you have and use spruce instead of balsa and you should be good to go! > > Brian Kraut > Engineering Alternatives, Inc. > www.engalt.com > > -- because the tail feathers are made of solid spruce...... [Rolling Eyes] Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189338#189338


    Message 47


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:56:11 AM PST US
    From: "Robert Butsch" <rbutsch@comcast.net>
    Subject: Need engine info
    Hello all: This may be a rather long post asking for advice on engines. Please bear with me. I answered an ad for a homebuilt project with an engine, mainly to find out about the possibility of using an aircraft engine instead of the Corvair I intend to convert. I was at my father's apartment when I made the call since the location of the project was not too far from his location. (my dad is 92 now and was a flight instructor right after the war). I had repeated the fellow's name as I wrote it down. After the conversation, my father said he thought he knew that name. I drove over to this fellow's home and asked if he ever knew a Carl Butsch. He said, "Well heck yes I know Carl. We grew up next door to each other not a block from here! Used to build model airplanes together back in the late twenties and early thirties"!! Needles to say, we had a great conversation for about three hours. Now to the meat of this novella. Turns out that I was not really interested in his project,... but he mentioned he had a 65 H.P. Lycoming that he had removed from the homebuilt when he bought it in flying condition. (don't know how long ago). He showed it to me and it is complete and has a motor mount and prop (70 X 30 it looks like). Also, he has two others like it for parts and a fourth which has been disassembled. He has the engine logs and says he pickled it. (we'll see about that statement). He has the engine logs which I have not read yet, but he says it had 570 hours when it was taken off of the flying homebuilt. He wants $3,000 for the package. It is remotely possible to get two useable engines from the whole if one gets lucky. Next situation. He also had a Continental A-75 sitting there which I asked about. He said it came out of a friends Aeronca for a larger engine upgrade. He has the logs for that one as well, and says it has 357 hours on it. Also pickled, he says. However he has no carb on it. He traded it for a couple of rebuilt mags for the Lycoming. No prop or motor mount with it. He wants $2,500 for that one. He also had a complete A-65 from an aircraft but no logs, as well as another A-65 off of an air boat which was running when he went to purchase it. Also, no logs with that one. I can't even take the time or space to list all the other stuff he showed me he is going to be selling! He is 86 years young and is loosing his sight but still seems to have the energy of a 50 year old man. Another couple of side comments before I get to some specific questions. The fellow was thrilled to happen across his old boyhood friend's son and I don't think he would sell me down the river just to get rid of these engines or parts. (but one never knows). I mentioned that I had a nasty looking core Corvair engine I intended to convert and had paid too much for it. He said, "Come out here, I want to show you something". In one of his sheds, he uncovered a complete Corvair engine he had taken out of the car and it was running at the time. He said it is one of the late model engines from a Monza, 110 hp, two carb set-up. Then he said, "Come back with a trailer and we'll load it up. You can HAVE IT" !!! I said, "Well, let me thin...O.K."!! I have read, again, Tony's advice on buying used aircraft engines and will take back my little light I made for illuminating the cylinder interiors and my little chip of an inspection mirror to have a look inside. I think I would prefer having the A-75 for a bit more H.P. but would still have to buy a carb and prop. I'll make a better judgment call after going back to inspect ,and hearing everyone's comments and advice. Now, questions: What is the designation for a 65 H.P. Lycoming? I can't remember the number the fellow gave me and in Tony's book he only gives designations back to the 108 H.P.Lycoming. Given the two options I'm considering, (Continental A-75 with logs, no carb, no engine mount, and no prop,......or the Lycoming 65 H.P. with Logs, the prop, and three other engines for possible parts and two motor mounts (for test stand use only) ), What would you guys do, given the prices for each situation I mentioned? What about fuel type if one of these is still useable after cleaning up? Both were meant to use low octane leaded fuel. Use 100 LL instead (what about possible detonation?), or auto unleaded fuel? What does one do in this situation? The Sensenich prop with the Lycoming package, (I believe it is stamped 70 X 30) is in excellent condition. Would this prop work very well on the Lycoming on the Air Camper? O.K, O.K., I'll stop now and wait for advice. Thanks for reading my novella! Bob Butsch in Indy.


    Message 48


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:11:38 AM PST US
    From: RAMPEYBOY@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Need engine info
    Bob, I believe the 65 hp Lyc to be an O-145? Maybe, maybe not.. **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)


    Message 49


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:20:41 AM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: Need engine info
    Hi Bob, The Lycoming is an O-145. They are pretty neat engines and 3K for the lot may be a bit on the high side but not too bad. They are hard to find parts for (I know, I have one) but are really smooth running. They are built different from a Continental with the cylinders and crankcase cast as one component and coverplates instead of a split case. However, I would probably not put one on a Pietenpol. Their 65 horses is not the same as an A-65 (or A-75). 145 cubic inches vs. 179(?) cubic inches. The O-145 is probably too light as well. I would make for a pretty long engine mount. The A-75 would be my choice of the two. I am burning 100LL now with mine in a Cub and it runs well. I do think I should pull my plugs and have a look soon, just to ease my mind. I do have the auto fuel STC and my airport has 93 octane for sale at the pumps. -john- John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com On Jun 23, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Robert Butsch wrote: > Hello all: > > This may be a rather long post asking for advice on engines. Please > bear with me. > I answered an ad for a homebuilt project with an engine, mainly to > find out about the possibility of using an aircraft engine instead > of the Corvair I intend to convert. I was at my father's apartment > when I made the call since the location of the project was not too > far from his location. (my dad is 92 now and was a flight > instructor right after the war). I had repeated the fellow's name > as I wrote it down. After the conversation, my father said he > thought he knew that name. I drove over to this fellow's home and > asked if he ever knew a Carl Butsch. He said, "Well heck yes I know > Carl. We grew up next door to each other not a block from here! > Used to build model airplanes together back in the late twenties and > early thirties"!! Needles to say, we had a great conversation for > about three hours. > > Now to the meat of this novella. Turns out that I was not really > interested in his project,... but he mentioned he had a 65 H.P. > Lycoming that he had removed from the homebuilt when he bought it in > flying condition. (don't know how long ago). He showed it to me > and it is complete and has a motor mount and prop (70 X 30 it looks > like). Also, he has two others like it for parts and a fourth which > has been disassembled. He has the engine logs and says he pickled > it. (we'll see about that statement). He has the engine logs which > I have not read yet, but he says it had 570 hours when it was taken > off of the flying homebuilt. He wants $3,000 for the package. It > is remotely possible to get two useable engines from the whole if > one gets lucky. > > Next situation. He also had a Continental A-75 sitting there which > I asked about. He said it came out of a friends Aeronca for a > larger engine upgrade. He has the logs for that one as well, and > says it has 357 hours on it. Also pickled, he says. However he has > no carb on it. He traded it for a couple of rebuilt mags for the > Lycoming. No prop or motor mount with it. He wants $2,500 for that > one. > > He also had a complete A-65 from an aircraft but no logs, as well as > another A-65 off of an air boat which was running when he went to > purchase it. Also, no logs with that one. I can't even take the > time or space to list all the other stuff he showed me he is going > to be selling! He is 86 years young and is loosing his sight but > still seems to have the energy of a 50 year old man. > > Another couple of side comments before I get to some specific > questions. The fellow was thrilled to happen across his old boyhood > friend's son and I don't think he would sell me down the river just > to get rid of these engines or parts. (but one never knows). I > mentioned that I had a nasty looking core Corvair engine I intended > to convert and had paid too much for it. He said, "Come out here, I > want to show you something". In one of his sheds, he uncovered a > complete Corvair engine he had taken out of the car and it was > running at the time. He said it is one of the late model engines > from a Monza, 110 hp, two carb set-up. Then he said, "Come back > with a trailer and we'll load it up. You can HAVE IT" !!! I said, > "Well, let me thin...O.K."!! > > I have read, again, Tony's advice on buying used aircraft engines > and will take back my little light I made for illuminating the > cylinder interiors and my little chip of an inspection mirror to > have a look inside. I think I would prefer having the A-75 for a > bit more H.P. but would still have to buy a carb and prop. I'll > make a better judgment call after going back to inspect ,and hearing > everyone's comments and advice. > > Now, questions: > What is the designation for a 65 H.P. Lycoming? I can't remember > the number the fellow gave me and in Tony's book he only gives > designations back to the 108 H.P.Lycoming. > > Given the two options I'm considering, (Continental A-75 with logs, > no carb, no engine mount, and no prop,......or the Lycoming 65 H.P. > with Logs, the prop, and three other engines for possible parts and > two motor mounts (for test stand use only) ), What would you guys > do, given the prices for each situation I mentioned? > > What about fuel type if one of these is still useable after cleaning > up? Both were meant to use low octane leaded fuel. Use 100 LL > instead (what about possible detonation?), or auto unleaded fuel? > What does one do in this situation? > > The Sensenich prop with the Lycoming package, (I believe it is > stamped 70 X 30) is in excellent condition. Would this prop work > very well on the Lycoming on the Air Camper? > > O.K, O.K., I'll stop now and wait for advice. Thanks for reading my > novella! > > Bob Butsch in Indy. > >


    Message 50


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:50:22 AM PST US
    From: RBush96589@aol.com
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    I have a corvair powered piet,and like the others say it likes to fly about 65 to 75 mph. that's at about 2400 rpm you can get 85 or 90 mph out of it but that is pretty much flat out. Randy Bush NX294RB **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)


    Message 51


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:53:09 AM PST US
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    From: outofthebox50@yahoo.com
    Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -----Original Message----- From: "Jeremy Bramall" <jbramall@SEWELL.com> To:<OUTOFTHEBOX50@YAHOO.COM> Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? After all this talk of cross country flying, baggage loads, and what planes to build, I see that many of you have other planes. I see that the pattern so far leans towards other faster two seater planes. In our family we have learned that it takes more than one plane to fulfill all of our needs. The Rans is for flying for fun. The Mooney is for traveling. The Piet is for the fun of building our own plane. My question is: What other planes do you have and how often do you fly them? Also, those of you that only have two seater planes, do you regret not having a plane that seats more people? My dad has a Mooney M20C. It is currently for sale for money reasons and he only uses it 100hrs a year and cant justify the expense. He also has a Rans Coyote II S6ES. We leave the doors off most of the year. He has a grass strip at his house and it is a hoot to fly. It gets flown 5-10 hrs a week. The Piet is his project that I do most of the leg work and research on. It is a Sky Scout, woodwork done, Subaru EA-81 on the stand with redrive, hoping to get it running in the next couple of weeks, as soon as I find time to finish converting the distributor. My plane is going to be a Wagabond. I have a Colt fuse that needs a lot of work and will start on it when the Piet is done or when I get divorced, whichever comes first. I will be stretching it a little and working the weight and balance so that I can add a childs seat, similar to the ones used in Cessna 150s, for my son. It will be my everything plane (cross country, pleasure flying, the works). Jeremy in Dallas.


    Message 52


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:04:11 AM PST US
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Just sold a Corby Starlet I had for 5 years. Single seat but fast and economical. The Piet is great for summer time in Ohio but the Starlet allowed me to fly with cabin heat in the winter time. Mike C.


    Message 53


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:09:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>
    Hey Randy, Are you going to fly your Piet to Brodhead this year? I'm planning to make my overnight stop at MKL (my mother lives in Jackson, TN) on Wednesday, 7/23, leaving early the next morning to fly to Brodhead. Want to go up in formation? You'll have to throttle back that Corvair to allow me to keep up with you. Gene Pennington (from Camden) was planning on going but it sounds like he won't be able to do it this year. Jack Phillips NX899JP Raleigh, NC _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RBush96589@aol.com Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:49 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: adding a baggage compartment I have a corvair powered piet,and like the others say it likes to fly about 65 to 75 mph. that's at about 2400 rpm you can get 85 or 90 mph out of it but that is pretty much flat out. Randy Bush NX294RB _____ Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars <http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007> . This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any o ther use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Fr ancais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese - Svenska: w ww.cardinalhealth.com/legal/email


    Message 54


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:13:01 AM PST US
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>
    I've got the Pietenpol for Low and Slow flying. I have an RV-4 for aerobatics and cross-country flying. I am building an RV-10 for Comfortable cross-country flying (and will sell the RV-4 when I get the -10 finished). Then I will need a seaplane of some variety and I should be pretty well set, unless I win the lottery. If that happens, I'm buying a P-51D. Jack Phillips NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of outofthebox50@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:52 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -----Original Message----- From: "Jeremy Bramall" <jbramall@SEWELL.com> To:<OUTOFTHEBOX50@YAHOO.COM> Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? After all this talk of cross country flying, baggage loads, and what planes to build, I see that many of you have other planes. I see that the pattern so far leans towards other faster two seater planes. In our family we have learned that it takes more than one plane to fulfill all of our needs. The Rans is for flying for fun. The Mooney is for traveling. The Piet is for the fun of building our own plane. My question is: What other planes do you have and how often do you fly them? Also, those of you that only have two seater planes, do you regret not having a plane that seats more people? My dad has a Mooney M20C. It is currently for sale for money reasons and he only uses it 100hrs a year and can't justify the expense. He also has a Rans Coyote II S6ES. We leave the doors off most of the year. He has a grass strip at his house and it is a hoot to fly. It gets flown 5-10 hrs a week. The Piet is his project that I do most of the leg work and research on. It is a Sky Scout, woodwork done, Subaru EA-81 on the stand with redrive, hoping to get it running in the next couple of weeks, as soon as I find time to finish converting the distributor. My plane is going to be a Wagabond. I have a Colt fuse that needs a lot of work and will start on it when the Piet is done or when I get divorced, whichever comes first. I will be stretching it a little and working the weight and balance so that I can add a child's seat, similar to the ones used in Cessna 150s, for my son. It will be my everything plane (cross country, pleasure flying, the works). Jeremy in Dallas. _________________________________________________ or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese


    Message 55


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:13:29 AM PST US
    From: airlion@bellsouth.net
    Subject: Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?


    Message 56


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:20:21 AM PST US
    From: airlion@bellsouth.net
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment


    Message 57


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:23:33 AM PST US
    From: "Robert Gow" <rgow@avionicsdesign.ca>
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    I have a Cherokee 140. Training on a Seminole and shopping for a 240 -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of airlion@bellsouth.net Sent: June 23, 2008 2:11 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?


    Message 58


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:23:33 AM PST US
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>
    Airlion? For whatever reason, your posts never come through for me. I just get a big blank page. Rick Holland was having the same issues over the weekend - his posts were blank even though they have worked before. Yours are always blank for me. You might try checking with Matte Draile and see if there is a setting that you can change to allow your posts to come trhough. Jack Phillips NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of airlion@bellsouth.net Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 2:11 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? _________________________________________________ or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese


    Message 59


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:24:55 AM PST US
    From: "Dave Abramson" <davea@symbolicdisplays.com>
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    I have a cessna 140 that I am learning to fly with until the pietenpol is done.... My next project will be a WW1 fighter!!! That is what I really want to fly...... Dave A. -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 11:00 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> Just sold a Corby Starlet I had for 5 years. Single seat but fast and economical. The Piet is great for summer time in Ohio but the Starlet allowed me to fly with cabin heat in the winter time. Mike C.


    Message 60


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:36:15 AM PST US
    From: airlion@bellsouth.net
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?


    Message 61


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:41:19 AM PST US
    From: "TOM STINEMETZE" <TOMS@mcpcity.com>
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    Ditto. All your posts have been arriving blank. Tom S. McPherson, KS >>> Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com 6/23/2008 1:21 PM >>> nalhealth.com> Airlion? For whatever reason, your posts never come through for me. I just get a big blank page.


    Message 62


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:43:05 AM PST US
    From: "Dortch, Steven D MAJ NG NG FORSCOM" <steven.d.dortch@us.army.mil>
    Subject: Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    i am just lurking the list until I get the urge to buy someone's completed project. I probably will not build until I retire and that is a ways away. I have a 1948 Vtail Bonanza. Blue Skies Steve D ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Abramson <davea@symbolicdisplays.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? > <davea@symbolicdisplays.com> > I have a cessna 140 that I am learning to fly with until the > pietenpol is > done.... My next project will be a WW1 fighter!!! That is what I > reallywant to fly...... > > Dave A. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Cuy, > Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC] > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 11:00 AM > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > Subject: Pietenpol-List: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? > > > RXC0)[ASRC]"<michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> > > > Just sold a Corby Starlet I had for 5 years. Single seat but > fast and > economical. > > The Piet is great for summer time in Ohio but the Starlet allowed > me to > fly with cabin > heat in the winter time. > > Mike C. > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 63


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:43:39 AM PST US
    From: airlion@bellsouth.net
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment


    Message 64


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:53:42 AM PST US
    From: airlion@bellsouth.net
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?


    Message 65


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:55:07 AM PST US
    From: airlion@bellsouth.net
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?


    Message 66


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:57:10 AM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    From Gardiner Mason (airlion) Jack, I am planning to fly my cessna 140 to Brodhead Leaving Lagrange, Ga. on July 23. Maybe we can meet up. Cheers, Gardiner Mason If you can read "raw source" of his messages, you can see what he is writing. -john- John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com On Jun 23, 2008, at 1:41 PM, airlion@bellsouth.net wrote: > >


    Message 67


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:58:02 AM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    J3 Cub, NC98872 is a recent addition to the family. Hangared at Hartford, WI. -john- John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com On Jun 23, 2008, at 12:51 PM, outofthebox50@yahoo.com wrote: > > > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Jeremy Bramall" <jbramall@SEWELL.com> > > Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:47:18 > To:<OUTOFTHEBOX50@YAHOO.COM> > Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY? > > > After all this talk of cross country flying, baggage loads, and what > planes to build, I see that many of you have other planes. I see > that the pattern so far leans towards other faster two seater > planes. In our family we have learned that it takes more than one > plane to fulfill all of our needs. The Rans is for flying for fun. > The Mooney is for traveling. The Piet is for the fun of building > our own plane. > > My question is: What other planes do you have and how often do you > fly them? Also, those of you that only have two seater planes, do > you regret not having a plane that seats more people? > > My dad has a Mooney M20C. It is currently for sale for money > reasons and he only uses it 100hrs a year and can=92t justify the > expense. > He also has a Rans Coyote II S6ES. We leave the doors off most of > the year. He has a grass strip at his house and it is a hoot to > fly. It gets flown 5-10 hrs a week. > The Piet is his project that I do most of the leg work and research > on. It is a Sky Scout, woodwork done, Subaru EA-81 on the stand > with redrive, hoping to get it running in the next couple of weeks, > as soon as I find time to finish converting the distributor. > > My plane is going to be a Wagabond. I have a Colt fuse that needs a > lot of work and will start on it when the Piet is done or when I get > divorced, whichever comes first. I will be stretching it a little > and working the weight and balance so that I can add a child=92s seat, > similar to the ones used in Cessna 150s, for my son. It will be my > everything plane (cross country, pleasure flying, the works). > > Jeremy in Dallas. > >


    Message 68


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:00:09 PM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    From Gardiner Mason (airlion) I fly a cessna 140 for all my xcountry work and for pleasure while I am b uilding my piet. If I am flying to a campout I do not carry any passengers for camping gear and food takes it all. For that reason a cessna 170 would be my ideal. No back seats for the station wagon. Also I sleep in the 140 with the seatback tilted back. Works fine for my short body. Cheers, Gardin er Mason. John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com On Jun 23, 2008, at 1:11 PM, airlion@bellsouth.net wrote: > I fly a cessna 140 for all my xcountry work and for pleasure while > I am b > uilding my piet. If I am flying to a campout I do not carry any > passengers > for camping gear and food takes it all. For that reason a cessna > 170 would > be my ideal. No back seats for the station wagon. Also I sleep in > the 140 > with the seatback tilted back. Works fine for my short body. Cheers, > Gardin > er Mason.


    Message 69


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:01:19 PM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    from Gardiner Mason (airlion): If your max gross wt. were 1320 lbs. what would your climb rate be after t ake off? I am building a corvair piet also and should have it flying by the end of the year. Gardiner Mason -------------- Original message from RBush96589@aol.com: -------------- I have a corvair powered piet,and like the others say it likes to fly about 65 to 75 mph. that's at about 2400 rpm you can get 85 or 90 mph out of it but that is pretty much flat out. Randy Bush NX294RB On Jun 23, 2008, at 1:17 PM, airlion@bellsouth.net wrote: > If your max gross wt. were 1320 lbs. what would your climb rate be > after t > ake off? I am building a corvair piet also and should have it flying > by the > end of the year. Gardiner Mason > -------------- Original message from RBush96589@aol.com: > -------------- > > > I have a corvair powered piet,and like the others say it likes to > fly about > 65 to 75 mph. that's at about 2400 rpm you can get 85 or 90 mph out > of it > but that is pretty much flat out. > > Randy Bush > > NX294RB


    Message 70


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:02:20 PM PST US
    From: "Bill Church" <eng@canadianrogers.com>
    Subject: Size of longerons and tailbrace wires
    Dan, >From what I can gather, the breaking strength of 1/16" aircraft cable (either galvanized or stainless steel) is listed at 480 lb. My guess would be that at that loading, the wood that the fittings are attached to is going to be in serious trouble. I think the 40-or-so year record of the Last Original shows that the arrangement is sufficient. Bill C.


    Message 71


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:04:18 PM PST US
    From: airlion@bellsouth.net
    Subject: blank


    Message 72


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:06:21 PM PST US
    From: "TOM STINEMETZE" <TOMS@mcpcity.com>
    Subject: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    Sorry, it's still blank. I have copied your entire message below. Tom S. McPherson, KS >>> airlion@bellsouth.net 6/23/2008 1:51 PM >>>


    Message 73


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:22:11 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: blank
    From: outofthebox50@yahoo.com
    Still blank for me. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -----Original Message----- From: airlion@bellsouth.net To:pietenpol-list@matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: blank


    Message 74


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:23:53 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: adding a baggage compartment
    From: "rubber314chicken" <rubber314chicken@gmail.com>
    actually The gross for a Pietenpol is about 1100. 1320 probably wouldn't climb well at all. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189388#189388


    Message 75


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:49:37 PM PST US
    From: "Brian Kraut" <brian.kraut@engalt.com>
    Subject: blank
    We can see your lips moving, but nothing is coming out! Brian Kraut Engineering Alternatives, Inc. www.engalt.com


    Message 76


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:52:49 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Stanley Surform planers----a lifesaver when rounding
    edges
    From: "Glenn Thomas" <glennthomas@flyingwood.com>
    Those pictures you posted show exactly what I am talking about. ...and after re-reading Jacks comment on doing this, I realized that I missed some info the on the first read. Between the two of you I should be in good shape tonight when I execute. Thanks -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189398#189398


    Message 77


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:17:23 PM PST US
    From: RBush96589@aol.com
    Subject: flying to brodhead
    Hi Jack, I would like to fly to Brodhead and Iam planning on it, but this is my first taildragger so I am still getting the hang of it.I have not flown in much wind as of yet so I need some practice with that for landings.Keep in touch and if I get to feeling comfortable enough with my skills I am going. Gardiner, the heaviest I have flown mine is about 1250lbs and I got maybe 300fpm or a little better. Randy Bush NX294RB **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)


    Message 78


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:49:10 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: The Great Waldo Pepper
    From: "Don Emch" <EmchAir@aol.com>
    Mehlin Smith and crew usually show The Great Waldo Pepper on the side of a hangar, one of the nights of Brodhead. Complete with a popcorn popping cart. Definitely a highlight of the Piet Fly-in! Don Emch NX899DE Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189435#189435


    Message 79


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:06:12 PM PST US
    From: airlion@bellsouth.net
    Subject: Re: flying to brodhead


    Message 80


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:25:58 PM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: flying to brodhead
    I will endeavor to translate for Gardiner Mason (airlion) Randy, thanks for the comeback. I have a cessna 140 with a C90 engine-- ma x gross wt of 1450lbs. My climb out is about 500ft/min. See you in Brodhead I hope. Cheers, Gardiner. -------------- Original message from RBush96589@aol.com: -------------- Hi Jack, I would like to fly to Brodhead and Iam planning on it, but this is my first taildragger so I am still getting the hang of it.I have not flown in much wind as of yet so I need some practice with that for landings.Keep in touch and if I get to feeling comfortable enough with my skills I am going . Gardiner, the heaviest I have flown mine is about 1250lbs and I got maybe 3 00fpm or a little better. Randy Bush NX294RB John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com On Jun 23, 2008, at 7:02 PM, airlion@bellsouth.net wrote: > >


    Message 81


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:56:55 PM PST US
    From: Darrel Jones <wd6bor@vom.com>
    Subject: Re: The Great Waldo Pepper
    AMsafetyC@aol.com wrote: > Some might say it is the greatest film in aviation, I would not. I > would say it is the greatest film since the invention of the airplane! > > In a message dated 6/23/2008 9:14:41 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov writes: > > (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> > > > Oscar, > > I read with utter amazement and disillusionment that you admitted to > having never > seen The Great Waldo Pepper ? Your life will not be complete > until you > see that. > You can find cheap DVD copies on Amazon. > > Mike C. e the es y --> - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS nbsp; > - List Contribution Web Site ; > ======================= > Sorry all, but my vote goes to "Only Angels have Wings". The flying may be better in Waldo, but I've always had a thing for Jean Arthur. Available from Netflix. Darrel Jones Pfeifer Sport NX154JP Sonoma, CA


    Message 82


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:04:54 PM PST US
    From: Darrel Jones <wd6bor@vom.com>
    Subject: Re: WHAT ELSE DO YOU FLY?
    Stinson 108-3 for cross country. Half interest in a Taylorcraft BC12-D just for fun. Darrel Jones Pfeifer Sport NX154JP Sonoma, CA


    Message 83


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:05:46 PM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: The Great Waldo Pepper
    > Is that all you intend to do for the rest of your life is rides for > cash? "Oh no, No Sir. Every penny I make goes into the building of a brand new biplane for air acrobatics." I find my mind wandering to a month in the future. Look for a ratty Cub and I won't be far away. -john- John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com On Jun 23, 2008, at 9:28 AM, AmsafetyC@aol.com wrote: > I see a trend emerging, as we have Jim Markle as the unofficial, > official Pietenpol ambassador, we are once again graced with the > fine works of John Hofmann as TGWP officinado, truly and expert in > his field. John, you do great work, I look forward to meeting you > next month. Your commentary of last night certainly brought laughter > to my tired worn and weary self. > > I for one applaud you knowledge and greater than appropriate > application of TGWP to the occasion. > > Thanks John a real pleasure to watch a master of the art for at work. > > Is that all you intend to do for the rest of your life is rides for > cash? > > John > > In a message dated 6/23/2008 10:15:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com > writes: > I too was shocked to read of Oscar's plight. I mean does he not know > that =93Some people would say that what you are about to see, is > probably the greatest exhibition of aeronautical skill in the > history of world. I myself, wouldn=92t go that far. It is probably > only the greatest since the invention of the aeroplane.=94 > > Axel Olsson - The Stunt King > > > John Hofmann > Vice-President, Information Technology > The Rees Group, Inc. > 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 > Madison, WI 53718 > Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 > Fax: 608.443.2474 > Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com > > On Jun 23, 2008, at 8:11 AM, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC] wrote: > >> [ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> >> >> >> Oscar, >> >> I read with utter amazement and disillusionment that you admitted to >> having never >> seen The Great Waldo Pepper ? Your life will not be complete >> until you >> see that. >> You can find cheap DVD copies on Amazon. >> >> Mike C. - The --> http://www.matr >> &n - &nbs --> http://www.matronics.com/co================ >> >> >> > > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matr on.matronics.com/ > ">http://forums.matronics.com > ://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient > used cars. > >


    Message 84


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:35:45 PM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: The Great Waldo Pepper
    Not a bad film at all. Jean Arthur had one of the greatest voices and deliveries of all time. Good story but I prefer "Waldo." Too much model work. Of course a favorite is pretty personal. Since nobody has asked I will give you a few good titles to add to your collection: "The Great Waldo Pepper"...Need I say more? "The Spirit of St. Louis"...Great Story and great aviation scenes. Who does not like Jimmy Stewart? "Hell's Angels"...Great flying, cheesy story. Jean Harlow coins the phrase about "slipping into something more comfortable."...woof! "Wings"..good WWI flick. Silent. "Airplane!"...Joey, do you like movies about gladiators?....Me John, Big Tree...I still laugh out loud every time I see this. "The Wings of Eagles"...a somewhat obscure John Wayne (John Ford directed movie). It is really a good film with some early Naval Aviation footage. "The Best Years of Our Lives"...1946, not strictly aviation but some good B-17 footage and one of the best films made. It deals with GIs coming home from the War in 1946. It is one of my favorites and is a truly great story. "Ace Eli and Roger of the Skies"...try to find this one. "The Battle of Britain"..The photography is beautiful on my 42" plasma. "The Right Stuff"...Cool Movie "The Blue Max"...Horrible Story with some good flying...."Brat? Cheese Curd?" "Top Gun"...NOT. Stupid movie. I thought it was cool when I was 22 in 1986. Now I realize what an idiot I was. "The Rocketeer"...My mother in law loves this one. Take it with a grain of salt and it is wonderful. "The Building of NX48 Something or Other"...some guy from Ohio built an airplane of some sort. Mildly entertaining...we'll see if he reads this post. "Twelve O'Clock High"...Great WWII flick. When I was a kid they ran the series of this name on late Saturday night TV. I never missed an episode. "The Bridges at Toko Ri"...one of the few good Korean War flicks, plus it had Grace Kelly. "Flyboys"... I want to like this one but have not been able to get through it. Too many red CGI Fokkers. This will get your collection started. There are many more I have missed but these stand out in my mine and I have to get to bed. -john- John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com On Jun 23, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Darrel Jones wrote: > > AMsafetyC@aol.com wrote: >> Some might say it is the greatest film in aviation, I would not. I >> would say it is the greatest film since the invention of the >> airplane! >> In a message dated 6/23/2008 9:14:41 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov >> writes: >> >> (GRC-RXC0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> >> >> >> Oscar, >> >> I read with utter amazement and disillusionment that you >> admitted to >> having never >> seen The Great Waldo Pepper ? Your life will not be complete >> until you >> see that. >> You can find cheap DVD copies on Amazon. >> >> Mike C. e the es y --> - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS nbsp; >> - List Contribution Web >> Site ; ======================= >> > Sorry all, but my vote goes to "Only Angels have Wings". The flying > may be better in Waldo, but I've always had a thing for Jean Arthur. > Available from Netflix. > > Darrel Jones > Pfeifer Sport NX154JP > Sonoma, CA > >


    Message 85


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:30:39 PM PST US
    From: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: Cross Country in a Piet
    Yeah, you should! Tonight! :-) Clif > I've never seen "The Great Waldo Pepper" but I guess I should rent it one > of these days... > > Oscar Zuniga , > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Checked by AVG. 7:16 PM


    Message 86


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:35:52 PM PST US
    From: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: The Great Waldo Pepper
    Another "can't miss" films is Cloud Dancer with David Carradine and Jennifer O'Neill. No computer planes in this one! The only place you'll find it though, is used on Ebay. Clif ----- Original Message ----- From: John Hofmann To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 8:30 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: The Great Waldo Pepper Not a bad film at all. Jean Arthur had one of the greatest voices and deliveries of all time. Good story but I prefer "Waldo." Too much model work. Of course a favorite is pretty personal. Since nobody has asked I will give you a few good titles to add to your collection:




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --