Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 02:00 AM - Re: Re: Piet - GN! differences (Jeff Boatright)
2. 03:18 AM - Beware- the feds are coming to "help" (HelsperSew@aol.com)
3. 06:55 AM - Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" (amsafetyc@aol.com)
4. 07:22 AM - Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" (Isablcorky@aol.com)
5. 02:03 PM - Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" (Ken Chambers)
6. 02:20 PM - Re: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? Thanks (John Egan)
7. 02:24 PM - Re: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? (John Egan)
8. 02:26 PM - Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" (HelsperSew@aol.com)
9. 03:13 PM - Re: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? Thanks (Jack Phillips)
10. 03:25 PM - Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" (walt)
11. 03:56 PM - Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" (Ryan Mueller)
12. 04:28 PM - Re: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? Thanks (KMHeide, BA, CPO, FAAOP)
13. 04:51 PM - Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" (Ken Chambers)
14. 10:24 PM - Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" (Clif Dawson)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Piet - GN! differences |
Maybe some of us should make YouTube videos showing our various
boarding/deplaning techniques. I'll try to remember to bring my
camera to the field next time.
>...I don't have a flop on the wing so a certain technique has to be
>exercised to get in, but once that is mastered getting in and out is
>a very easy... The front cockpit is a little more snug than the
>rear, but again with the right technique it is also very simple.
>Again at my height I have no trouble at all getting in and out. My
>most common passenger is my dad and he is about 6' 2" and around 225
>lbs.
...
--
---
Jeffrey H. Boatright, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Ophthalmology
Emory University School of Medicine
Editor-in-Chief
Molecular Vision
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Beware- the feds are coming to "help" |
Dear Piet listers,
Please be advised our overreaching federal government is at it again, slowl
y
but surely trying to erode our freedoms in the name of "safety". It is only
going to get worse with this new administration we have. This proposal does
not effect us directly, but we are next. Do not doubt it. Dan H.
TSA Aviation Proposals Raise Civil Liberties Questions
EAA and allies appeal for extension of comment period
October 29, 2008 =94 Upon receiving and reviewing a Notice of Propos
ed
Rulemaking (NPRM) that the Transportation Security Administration issued to
day, EAA
immediately objected to the posted public-comment period of only 60 days. Th
e
NPRM calls for sweeping new security requirements on the operation of all
aircraft exceeding 12,500 pounds =93 commercial and personal-use airc
raft alike.
Because of the onerous requirements and encroachment on personal freedoms
suggested in the NPRM, EAA contends that the NPRM should have a comment per
iod
of no less than 120 days. Several allies, including Missouri Congressman Sa
m
Graves, an active EAA member, have joined EAA in filing objections to the
comment period's 60-day duration.
"These proposed rules would have dramatic ramifications for aircraft
operators," said Earl Lawrence, EAA vice president of industry and regulato
ry
affairs. =9CFurthermore, they raise serious questions in the areas of
interstate
commerce, government authority, civil liberties, and Constitutional rights.
Rulemaking proposals that present the potential for such dramatic consequen
ces
require more than a mere 60 days for public to study and comment on them.
=9D
The TSA's proposed rules would impose numerous requirements on the operator
s
of these aircraft, even those operating the aircraft for private and
personal use, including the following
* The owner/operator must assign a security director to oversee fligh
t
operations.
* The security director must obtain TSA approval for the security
program associated with every operation of the aircraft.
* The security program must be audited and approved by the TSA.
* The owner/operator must submit fingerprints of all flight-crew
members to the TSA.
* The owner/operator must submit a passenger manifest for each flight
to the TSA.
"Once again we're seeing an unwarranted and unrealistic hyper-focus on
airplanes as potential instruments of terror, when real-life experience sho
ws that
trucks, automobiles, and
computers can pose equal, or even greater, threats. This is about our
nation's ongoing struggle to strike the right balance between upholding the
personal freedoms and rights that make our country great and taking the nec
essary
steps to address and prevent legitimate threats to our security," Lawrence
said.
"We haven't seen undue restrictions on the use of trucks, for example,
because there's an understanding that these are important to interstate com
merce
and the personal freedom to move persons and objects about the country. We
need to foster the same understanding when it comes to the role of personal
aircraft in our society," Lawrence said. The NPRM's 60-day comment period e
xpires
Dec. 29, 2008. If the TSA adopts the recommendation of EAA and its allies,
the 120-day comment period would end March 31, 2009.
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all othe
r
Holiday needs. Search Now.
ttp://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" |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Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" |
In a message dated 11/9/2008 8:56:37 A.M. Central Standard Time,
amsafetyc@aol.com writes:
what's this country coming to?
Good buddy, hate to tell you but it's not coming, IT'S HERE
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" |
Politics has no place here. Lets cut the screwball predictions and stick
with the regulations.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:57 AM, <amsafetyc@aol.com> wrote:
> Wow, this in not about national security but more a out more govt limitin
g
> our ability. Between this and the Obama civil national security agency
> proposed in his speech. We should have all our freedoms revoked or
> controlled to the point of asking permission then providing justification
to
> exercise them.
>
> Brown shirts and papers what's this country coming to?
>
> John
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBe
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: HelsperSew@aol.com
> *Date*: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 06:18:23 EST
> *To*: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
> *Subject*: Pietenpol-List: Beware- the feds are coming to "help"
>
>
> Dear Piet listers,
>
>
> Please be advised our overreaching federal government is at it again,
> slowly but surely trying to erode our freedoms in the name of "safety". I
t
> is only going to get worse with this new administration we have. This
> proposal does not effect us directly, but we are next. Do not doubt it.
Dan
> H.
>
>
> TSA Aviation Proposals Raise Civil Liberties Questions
>
> *EAA and allies appeal for extension of comment period*
>
> *October 29, 2008* =97 Upon receiving and reviewing a Notice of Proposed
> Rulemaking (NPRM) that the Transportation Security Administration issued
> today, EAA immediately objected to the posted public-comment period of
> only 60 days. The NPRM calls for sweeping new security requirements on th
e
> operation of *all* aircraft exceeding 12,500 pounds ' commercial and
> personal-use aircraft alike.
>
> Because of the onerous requirements and encroachment on personal freedoms
> suggested in the NPRM, EAA contends that the NPRM should have a comment
> period of no less than 120 days. Several allies, including Missouri
> Congressman Sam Graves, an active EAA member, have joined EAA in filing
> objections to the comment period's 60-day duration.
>
> "These proposed rules would have dramatic ramifications for aircraft
> operators," said Earl Lawrence, EAA vice president of industry and
> regulatory affairs. "Furthermore, they raise serious questions in the are
as
> of interstate commerce, government authority, civil liberties, and
> Constitutional rights. Rulemaking proposals that present the potential fo
r
> such dramatic consequences require more than a mere 60 days for public to
> study and comment on them."
> The TSA's proposed rules would impose numerous requirements on the
> operators of these aircraft, even those operating the aircraft for privat
e
> and personal use, including the following
>
>
> - The owner/operator must assign a security director to oversee flight
> operations.
> - The security director must obtain TSA approval for the security
> program associated with every operation of the aircraft.
> - The security program must be audited and approved by the TSA.
> - The owner/operator must submit fingerprints of all flight-crew
> members to the TSA.
> - The owner/operator must submit a passenger manifest for *each* fligh
t
> to the TSA.
>
> "Once again we're seeing an unwarranted and unrealistic hyper-focus on
> airplanes as potential instruments of terror, when real-life experience
> shows that trucks, automobiles, and
>
>
> computers can pose equal, or even greater, threats. This is about our
> nation's ongoing struggle to strike the right balance between upholding t
he
> personal freedoms and rights that make our country great and taking the
> necessary steps to address and prevent legitimate threats to our security
,"
> Lawrence said.
>
> "We haven't seen undue restrictions on the use of trucks, for example,
> because there's an understanding that these are important to interstate
> commerce and the personal freedom to move persons and objects about the
> country. We need to foster the same understanding when it comes to the ro
le
> of personal aircraft in our society," Lawrence said.
> The NPRM's 60-day comment period expires Dec. 29, 2008. If the TSA adopts
> the recommendation of EAA and its allies, the 120-day comment period woul
d
> end March 31, 2009.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other Holiday
> needs. Search Now.
>
===================== *
>
>
--
Ken Chambers
512-796-1798
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? Thanks |
Thanks Jack for the info regarding jury strut attachment at the spar.- I
made brackets similar to yours and Mike C's.- Another topic:- Mike ment
ined to me that you tested ball valves for fuel shut off use.- I'm instal
ling a nose tank, so I am selecting my shut off valve, actuating cable, and
gascolator.- Do you have comments on these components?- I am especiall
y interested in learning about the controls for the valve.- Do I have to
have a locking type control for fuel?- It looks like a lot of builders ar
e using the T handle control cable from Aircraft Spruce.- Do you know if
the control has to be lockable or positive position or can it simply be an
actuating lever? Have you found that a hardware store bress ball valve is c
onparable to-the mini ACS ball valve?-=0A=0ASo any thoughts you have or
can remember are appreciated.- ball valves, controll types to actuate th
e valve and gascolators.=0A=0AThanks again.=0A=0Ajohn egan=0Asnow flurries
here in Wisconsion today=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AF
rom: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>=0ATo: pietenpol-li
st@matronics.com=0ASent: Monday, November 3, 2008 3:22:48 PM=0ASubject: RE:
Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?=0A=0A=0AJohn,=0A-
=0AHere is what I did at the spar.- I made a fitting from =BE=94 x =BE=94
6061-T6 aluminum angle from Home Depot.- At the lift strut I did exactly
like Don Emch, except I cut the end of the eyebolt off flush with the lift
strut and welded it too.- Here is a picture:=0A-=0A-=0AJack Phillips
=0ANX899JP=0ARaleigh, NC=0A-=0A=0A________________________________=0A=0AF
rom:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-
server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Egan=0ASent: Monday, November 03, 2
008 3:44 PM=0ATo: pietenpol-list@matronics.com=0ASubject: Re: Pietenpol-Lis
t: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?=0A-=0AThanks Don, however I am
-curious about the attachment at the spar, not at-the strut.- What di
d you do at the spar? Any pictures of flies on the spar attachment.=0A-
=0ACan you remind me what shade of green you painted that as well?- I lik
e it.=0A-=0Ajohn=0Agreenville , wi=0A-=0A=0A___________________________
_____=0A=0AFrom:Don Emch <EmchAir@aol.com>=0ATo: pietenpol-list@matronics.c
om=0ASent: Monday, November 3, 2008 2:11:41 PM=0ASubject: Pietenpol-List: R
e: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?=0A=0A--> Pietenpol-List message poste
d by: "Don Emch" <EmchAir@aol.com>=0A=0AHi John,=0A=0AThere are several way
s to do it.- This was my method.- I welded a tube in to the strut and p
ut an eye bolt in.- Check out the fly in the picture too!- Huh.=0A=0Aht
tp://westcoastpiet.com/images/Don%20Emch/Brodhead__20070720_149.JPG=0A=0ADo
n Emch=0ANX899DE=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ARead this topic =0A =0A =0A_______________
__________________________________=0A=0AThis message is for the designated
recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary=0Aor otherwise priva
te information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
=0Aimmediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you i
s prohibited.=0A=0ADansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japane
se - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese=0A=0A=0A=0A
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? |
Thanks Don and Dan and all on the recent answers to my jury strut attachmen
t questions.- This all helps me very much.- Having fun finally working
on these little details.- Next steps, learning my way through the fuel sy
stem.=0A=0AJohn e.=0Agreenville, wi.=0A=0A-=0A=0A=0A=0A__________________
______________=0AFrom: Don Emch <EmchAir@aol.com>=0ATo: pietenpol-list@matr
onics.com=0ASent: Monday, November 3, 2008 8:34:21 PM=0ASubject: Pietenpol-
List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?=0A=0A--> Pietenpol-List messag
e posted by: "Don Emch" <EmchAir@aol.com>=0A=0AJohn,=0A=0ASorry about that.
- I guess I can't tell the difference between spar and strut.- I did my
spar attachment just like Mike Cuy's.- Bent some flat stock into an angl
e.- I think it might have been .063".- Hey Jack, yeah drilling those ra
tes right up there with drilling the spars.- Makes for a few tense moment
s.=0A=0ADon Emch=0ANX899DE=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ARead this topic online here:=0A=0A
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=212190#212190=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
=========================0A
======0A=0A=0A
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" |
Ken,
I do not consider this politics. There is no partisanship here. This is a
clear example of an over-reaching government trying to overstep their bounds by
curtailing our individual liberties and freedoms. The only reason our country
is the leader of the world today is freedom. Not as any result of what the
government did "for us". All you need to do is look at Europe and see how
little flying is done there. The government has put so many restrictions and
taxes in place it has stifled private flying almost to extinction in some cases.
Last summer right before Brodhead we had some Swiss fellows visit here at
Poplar Grove. The man and his son were building a Hatz biplane. He told me that
when they finish, they will only be able to fly it 20 hours per year because
of the huge expenses due to the taxes, take-off and landing fees, and
government restrictions. He was extremely envious of our freedoms here. He said
that the flying-friendly atmosphere we enjoy here is unheard of in Switzerland.
We must fight these clowns in Washington that are running the government at
every opportunity!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wake up people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dan Helsper
Poplar Grove, IL.
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? Thanks |
Hi John,
I ended up using a valve I bought on ebay, but was planning to use the
ball
valve ACS sells for $23 until I found the very same valve (same
manufacturer, same part number) at Home Depot for about $6. As far as I
know it should work just fine.
I positioned mine so the shutoff is in the rear cockpit, just under the
instrument panel. Kept me from having to run another flexible cable to
the
firewall.
Jack
NX899JP
_____
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John
Egan
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?
Thanks
Thanks Jack for the info regarding jury strut attachment at the spar. I
made brackets similar to yours and Mike C's. Another topic: Mike
mentined
to me that you tested ball valves for fuel shut off use. I'm installing
a
nose tank, so I am selecting my shut off valve, actuating cable, and
gascolator. Do you have comments on these components? I am especially
interested in learning about the controls for the valve. Do I have to
have
a locking type control for fuel? It looks like a lot of builders are
using
the T handle control cable from Aircraft Spruce. Do you know if the
control
has to be lockable or positive position or can it simply be an actuating
lever? Have you found that a hardware store bress ball valve is
conparable
to the mini ACS ball valve?
So any thoughts you have or can remember are appreciated. ball valves,
controll types to actuate the valve and gascolators.
Thanks again.
john egan
snow flurries here in Wisconsion today
_____
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2008 3:22:48 PM
Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?
John,
Here is what I did at the spar. I made a fitting from =BE=94 x =BE=94
6061-T6
aluminum angle from Home Depot. At the lift strut I did exactly like
Don
Emch, except I cut the end of the eyebolt off flush with the lift strut
and
welded it too. Here is a picture:
Jack Phillips
NX899JP
Raleigh, NC
_____
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John
Egan
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?
Thanks Don, however I am curious about the attachment at the spar, not
at
the strut. What did you do at the spar? Any pictures of flies on the
spar
attachment.
Can you remind me what shade of green you painted that as well? I like
it.
john
greenville , wi
_____
From: Don Emch <EmchAir@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2008 2:11:41 PM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?
Hi John,
There are several ways to do it. This was my method. I welded a tube
in to
the strut and put an eye bolt in. Check out the fly in the picture too!
Huh.
http://westcoastpiet.com/images/Don%20Emch/Brodhead__20070720_149.JPG
Don Emch
NX899DE
Read this topic
_________________________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary
or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error,
please
notify the sender
immediate.
Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands
-
Norsk - Portuguese
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" |
I guess I'm missing something here, but these rules are for airplanes
that weigh 6 1/4 tons.
And I further assume that these are commercial commuter flights.
I for one ,if I was getting on a commercial flight with my wife and two
small daughters, would want a flight that was completely protected from
all the out side crap that could happen to them.
Guess I'm missing something, but how does this compare to a 600# Piet?
PS I work under the wings of the "big Iron" of Newark Airport (NWK) all
the time. And it's amazing how efficiently they all run.
Obama's my man
walt evans
NX140DL
----- Original Message -----
From: amsafetyc@aol.com
To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Beware- the feds are coming to "help"
Wow, this in not about national security but more a out more govt
limiting our ability. Between this and the Obama civil national security
agency proposed in his speech. We should have all our freedoms revoked
or controlled to the point of asking permission then providing
justification to exercise them.
Brown shirts and papers what's this country coming to?
John
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
From: HelsperSew@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 06:18:23 EST
To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Beware- the feds are coming to "help"
Dear Piet listers,
Please be advised our overreaching federal government is at it again,
slowly but surely trying to erode our freedoms in the name of "safety".
It is only going to get worse with this new administration we have. This
proposal does not effect us directly, but we are next. Do not doubt it.
Dan H.
TSA Aviation Proposals Raise Civil Liberties Questions
EAA and allies appeal for extension of comment period
October 29, 2008 =94 Upon receiving and reviewing a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that the Transportation Security
Administration issued today, EAA immediately objected to the posted
public-comment period of only 60 days. The NPRM calls for sweeping new
security requirements on the operation of all aircraft exceeding 12,500
pounds =93 commercial and personal-use aircraft alike.
Because of the onerous requirements and encroachment on personal
freedoms suggested in the NPRM, EAA contends that the NPRM should have a
comment period of no less than 120 days. Several allies, including
Missouri Congressman Sam Graves, an active EAA member, have joined EAA
in filing objections to the comment period's 60-day duration.
"These proposed rules would have dramatic ramifications for aircraft
operators," said Earl Lawrence, EAA vice president of industry and
regulatory affairs. =9CFurthermore, they raise serious questions
in the areas of interstate commerce, government authority, civil
liberties, and Constitutional rights. Rulemaking proposals that present
the potential for such dramatic consequences require more than a mere 60
days for public to study and comment on them.=9D
The TSA's proposed rules would impose numerous requirements on the
operators of these aircraft, even those operating the aircraft for
private and personal use, including the following
a.. The owner/operator must assign a security director to oversee
flight operations.
b.. The security director must obtain TSA approval for the security
program associated with every operation of the aircraft.
c.. The security program must be audited and approved by the TSA.
d.. The owner/operator must submit fingerprints of all flight-crew
members to the TSA.
e.. The owner/operator must submit a passenger manifest for each
flight to the TSA.
"Once again we're seeing an unwarranted and unrealistic hyper-focus on
airplanes as potential instruments of terror, when real-life experience
shows that trucks, automobiles, and
computers can pose equal, or even greater, threats. This is about our
nation's ongoing struggle to strike the right balance between upholding
the personal freedoms and rights that make our country great and taking
the necessary steps to address and prevent legitimate threats to our
security," Lawrence said.
"We haven't seen undue restrictions on the use of trucks, for example,
because there's an understanding that these are important to interstate
commerce and the personal freedom to move persons and objects about the
country. We need to foster the same understanding when it comes to the
role of personal aircraft in our society," Lawrence said.
The NPRM's 60-day comment period expires Dec. 29, 2008. If the TSA
adopts the recommendation of EAA and its allies, the 120-day comment
period would end March 31, 2009.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other
Holiday needs.
======================
=EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=03g=EF=BD=EF=BD
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" |
Walt,
Per the beginning of the proposal:
http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/nprm_lasp.pdf
...the TSA wants to apply these changes to all aircraft, corporate or
private, that have a maximum certificated takeoff weight above 12,500 lbs.
The "private" portion of that proposal would hit the warbird/large vintage
aircraft movement in particular. You can bet that non-profits would fall
under it as well, whether they consider them corporate or private.
Your scheduled or charted airline service currently has such rules in place;
they want to extend them to all aircraft over 12,500, not just airliners. It
matters to you if you want to see historically significant large aircraft
continue to take to the skies at fly-ins and airshows across the country.
The cost and BS factor in dealing with this proposal would cause many
operators (be they non-profits or individuals) to throw in the towel,
especially with the economy in the crapper.
I thank Dan for raising the large aircraft issue, but I disagree with his
assessment of the future. This proposal is the product of the current
administration's continued war against the Constitution, our liberties, and
our freedom. I don't know if the president-elect has the answers, but I
don't see him continuing down the path the current administration has
decided to blaze. I know I shouldn't have said that; oh well, I wanted to
respond. I'll leave it at that. If you have an issue with what I said
politically please contact me personally and we can discuss; I'll not air it
here any further.
I hope everyone had a good weekend. We had a blast at the Golf Company USMC
Birthday Ball in Madison, WI (233 years and going strong!). Everyone came
home safe, we drank far too much beer into the wee hours of the morning, and
fun was had by all. Have a good night,
Ryan
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 5:24 PM, walt <waltdak@verizon.net> wrote:
> I guess I'm missing something here, but these rules are for airplanes
> that weigh 6 1/4 tons.
> And I further assume that these are commercial commuter flights.
> I for one ,if I was getting on a commercial flight with my wife and two
> small daughters, would want a flight that was completely protected from all
> the out side crap that could happen to them.
> Guess I'm missing something, but how does this compare to a 600# Piet?
> PS I work under the wings of the "big Iron" of Newark Airport (NWK) all the
> time. And it's amazing how efficiently they all run.
> Obama's my man
> walt evans
> NX140DL
>
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? Thanks |
Jack,
-
Any possibility of attaching a few photos of the set-up and valve?
-
KM Heide
-
--- On Sun, 11/9/08, Jack Phillips <pietflyr@bellsouth.net> wrote:
From: Jack Phillips <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? Thanks
Hi John,
-
I ended up using a valve I bought on ebay, but was planning to use the ball
valve ACS sells for $23 until I found the very same valve (same manufactur
er, same part number) at Home Depot for about $6.- As far as I know it sh
ould work just fine.
-
I positioned mine so the shutoff is in the rear cockpit, just under the ins
trument panel.- Kept me from having to run another flexible cable to the
firewall.
-
Jack
NX899JP
-
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis
t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Egan
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar? Thanks
-
Thanks Jack for the info regarding jury strut attachment at the spar.- I
made brackets similar to yours and Mike C's.- Another topic:- Mike ment
ined to me that you tested ball valves for fuel shut off use.- I'm instal
ling a nose tank, so I am selecting my shut off valve, actuating cable, and
gascolator.- Do you have comments on these components?- I am especiall
y interested in learning about the controls for the valve.- Do I have to
have a locking type control for fuel?- It looks like a lot of builders ar
e using the T handle control cable from Aircraft Spruce.- Do you know if
the control has to be lockable or positive position or can it simply be an
actuating lever? Have you found that a hardware store bress ball valve is c
onparable to-the mini ACS ball valve?-
-
So any thoughts you have or can remember are appreciated.- ball valves, c
ontroll types to actuate the valve and gascolators.
-
Thanks again.
-
john egan
snow flurries here in Wisconsion today
-
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips@cardinalhealth.com>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2008 3:22:48 PM
Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?
John,
-
Here is what I did at the spar.- I made a fitting from =BE=94 x =BE=94 60
61-T6 aluminum angle from Home Depot.- At the lift strut I did exactly li
ke Don Emch, except I cut the end of the eyebolt off flush with the lift st
rut and welded it too.- Here is a picture:
-
-
Jack Phillips
NX899JP
Raleigh, NC
-
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis
t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Egan
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?
-
Thanks Don, however I am-curious about the attachment at the spar, not at
-the strut.- What did you do at the spar? Any pictures of flies on the
spar attachment.
-
Can you remind me what shade of green you painted that as well?- I like i
t.
-
john
greenville , wi
-
From: Don Emch <EmchAir@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2008 2:11:41 PM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Jury Strut Attachment at the Spar?
Hi John,
There are several ways to do it.- This was my method.- I welded a tube
in to the strut and put an eye bolt in.- Check out the fly in the picture
too!- Huh.
http://westcoastpiet.com/images/Don%20Emch/Brodhead__20070720_149.JPG
Don Emch
NX899DE
Read this topic - --_________________________________________________
-This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privi
leged, proprietaryor otherwise private information. If you have received it
in error, please notify the senderimmediate. -Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol
- Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - Norsk - Portuguese
-
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/chr
ef="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matroni
cs.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
=0A=0A=0A
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" |
Dan
When politicians are mentioned by name it quickly becomes political. Obama
was clearly mentioned. Might be justifiable if as president Obama had
championed some great freedom grab. But he hasn't even taken office!
Again, let's stick with specific regulations that effect Pietenpol pilots
and avoid vague predictions of impending doom. There are plenty of places
for rants of that nature on the Internet. This isn't one of them.
Ken
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:27 PM, <HelsperSew@aol.com> wrote:
> Ken,
>
> I do not consider this politics. There is no partisanship here. This is a
> clear example of an over-reaching government trying to overstep their bounds
> by curtailing our individual liberties and freedoms. The only reason our
> country is the leader of the world today is freedom. Not as any result of
> what the government did "for us". All you need to do is look at Europe and
> see how little flying is done there. The government has put so many
> restrictions and taxes in place it has stifled private flying almost to
> extinction in some cases. Last summer right before Brodhead we had some
> Swiss fellows visit here at Poplar Grove. The man and his son were building
> a Hatz biplane. He told me that when they finish, they will only be able to
> fly it 20 hours per year because of the huge expenses due to the taxes,
> take-off and landing fees, and government restrictions. He was *extremely
> envious* of our freedoms here. He said that the flying-friendly atmosphere
> we enjoy here is *unheard of* in Switzerland. We must fight these clowns
> in Washington that are running the government at every
> opportunity!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *Wake up people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Dan Helsper
> Poplar Grove, IL.
> *
>
>
> ------------------------------
> AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all
> other2x1200798498/aol?redir
> http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001">Search Now.
>
> *
>
>
--
Ken Chambers
512-796-1798
Message 14
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Beware- the feds are coming to "help" |
History repeats.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/apr/24/usa.comment
Clif
----- Original Message -----
From: Isablcorky@aol.com
To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 7:22 AM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Beware- the feds are coming to "help"
In a message dated 11/9/2008 8:56:37 A.M. Central Standard Time,
amsafetyc@aol.com writes:
what's this country coming to?
Good buddy, hate to tell you but it's not coming, IT'S HERE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
11/9/2008 2:14 PM
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|