Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Sat 02/14/09


Total Messages Posted: 20



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:25 AM - Re: pinked tapes (Gene Rambo)
     2. 07:03 AM - Re: Gary & Shad's motor mount (Rick Holland)
     3. 08:07 AM - Weight does matter but cosmentics of latex ? (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC])
     4. 08:22 AM - Re: Weight does matter but cosmentics of latex ? (amsafetyc@aol.com)
     5. 08:38 AM - Re: Weight does matter but cosmentics of latex ? (Gary Boothe)
     6. 08:47 AM - Re: Gary & Shad's motor mount (Gary Boothe)
     7. 10:20 AM - Re: Weight does matter but cosmentics of latex ? (Michael Perez)
     8. 10:37 AM - Re: Heel brake pedals (Rick Holland)
     9. 11:02 AM - Re: Gary & Shad's motor mount (Rick Holland)
    10. 11:48 AM - full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC])
    11. 12:25 PM - Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger (H RULE)
    12. 01:52 PM - Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger (walt)
    13. 02:51 PM - Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger (Gene Rambo)
    14. 03:05 PM - Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/Captain Sullenberger (Scott Knowlton)
    15. 03:40 PM - Re: Gary & Shad's motor mount (Ryan Mueller)
    16. 04:35 PM - Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger (Gene & Tammy)
    17. 05:02 PM - Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger (walt)
    18. 05:02 PM - Re: to fly or build? (walt)
    19. 06:28 PM - Re: to fly or build? (shad bell)
    20. 08:42 PM - Re: Gary & Shad's motor mount (Rick Holland)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:25:41 AM PST US
    From: "Gene Rambo" <generambo@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: pinked tapes
    It is not correct that pinked tape is "typically" biased tape. Virtually all tape is pinked. The pinking keeps the edge from fraying. In the very early times, such as WWI, tapes were often just frayed on purpose for a few threads to keep them from unravelling further. Straight edged tapes are the exception, mostly when synthetics came about, and only because they were cheaper. Biased tape is a whole different thing. Biased tape can make curves as stated. Again, usually pinked but I suppose there may be straight edged bias tape as well. Gene


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:03:44 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Gary & Shad's motor mount
    From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com>
    I went with the mount described in William Wynnes manual, he dedicates around six pages one just building the mount. Rick On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Ryan Mueller <rmueller23@gmail.com> wrote: > Shad (or whomever may know), > > Did you guys go with the motor mount per the Pietenpol plans for your > Corvair? I didn't think to make a note of that at Brodhead, and I can't tell > definitively in any of my pics. Thanks, > > Ryan > > * > > * > > -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:07:20 AM PST US
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <Michael.D.Cuy@nasa.gov>
    Subject: Weight does matter but cosmentics of latex ?
    Forgive the intrusion good people, (fans of TGWP will recognize that line) but if I might interject a personal opinion about latex finishes: they look like crap. Please allow me to further express my sentiments that I am a staunch suppor ter of those who use latex paint or any other method to finish the fabric on their airplane or many simple reasons----if you took the time to saw up wood, make metal fittings from raw sheet and tube 4130 material, learned how to weld and rib stitch, if you have burned your fingers on recently-ground fittings, if you've had T-88 in places where you didn't even know you had p laces, if you've coughed all night long from inhaling wood dust particles from sanding, if you've had to decide to wait until next mon th or next payday to buy turnbuckles because your kids tuition was due or you had some dental bills to pay or you just took on a c ar payment, if you've thought seriously about giving up your project completely and just selling it on ebay, and if you've done all these things to build your very own Pietenpol then I say you can put whatever the heck you please on your airplane to finish the fab ric. You can use whatever engine you want, Model A, Corvair, Subaru, Continental, Evinrude, wood landing gear, steel gear, Cub tires, motorcycle wheels, long fuselage, short fuselage, nose fuel, wing fuel, both nose and wing fuel, wider center section, a cent er section with a flop or a center section with a cutout, a clipped wing Pietenpol, or even (and some will gasp at this one) build a Grega GN-1 then you have every right to make every decision about the options you chose for your airplane. When people come up to me and say "well why didn't you......" my general response is "well when YOU build your Pietenpol.....YOU can incorporate that into yo ur airplane" but I chose to 'do it this way'. Mike C. in Ohio PS-- there are some latex finished airplanes out there that really don't lo ok bad....Shad and Gary Bell's a very nice example of a latex-painted Piet and I had to look twice up close before I realized it...so it can be d one, it can save lots of money (which is very admirable if safety is not co mpromised) and it can look okay !


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:22:01 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Weight does matter but cosmentics of latex ?
    From: amsafetyc@aol.com
    U21pbGUgc29uIHdlIGRvbid0IHdhbnQgdG8gZGlzY29uY2VydCB0aGUgbWFzc2VzLiBOb3cgdGVs bCB1cyB3aGF0IHlvdSByZWFsbHkgdGhpbmshIEFuZCB0aGlzIHRpbWUgZG9uJ3QgaG9sZCBiYWNr DQoNCkpvaG4NClNlbnQgZnJvbSBteSBWZXJpem9uIFdpcmVsZXNzIEJsYWNrQmVycnkNCg0KLS0t LS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206ICJDdXksIE1pY2hhZWwgRC4gKEdSQy1SWEQw KVtBU1JDXSIgPE1pY2hhZWwuRC5DdXlAbmFzYS5nb3Y+DQoNCkRhdGU6IFNhdCwgMTQgRmViIDIw MDkgMTA6MDU6NDcgDQpUbzogcGlldGVucG9sLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbTxwaWV0ZW5wb2wt bGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPg0KU3ViamVjdDogUGlldGVucG9sLUxpc3Q6IFdlaWdodCBkb2Vz IG1hdHRlciBidXQgY29zbWVudGljcyBvZiBsYXRleCA/DQoNCg0KRm9yZ2l2ZSB0aGUgaW50cnVz aW9uIGdvb2QgcGVvcGxlLCAoZmFucyBvZiBUR1dQIHdpbGwgcmVjb2duaXplIHRoYXQgbGluZSkg YnV0IGlmIEkgbWlnaHQgaW50ZXJqZWN0IGEgcGVyc29uYWwNCm9waW5pb24gYWJvdXQgbGF0ZXgg ZmluaXNoZXM6IHRoZXkgbG9vayBsaWtlIGNyYXAuDQoNClBsZWFzZSBhbGxvdyBtZSB0byBmdXJ0 aGVyIGV4cHJlc3MgbXkgc2VudGltZW50cyB0aGF0IEkgYW0gYSBzdGF1bmNoIHN1cHBvcnRlciBv ZiB0aG9zZSB3aG8gdXNlIGxhdGV4IHBhaW50IG9yIGFueSBvdGhlcg0KbWV0aG9kIHRvIGZpbmlz aCB0aGUgZmFicmljIG9uIHRoZWlyIGFpcnBsYW5lIG9yIG1hbnkgc2ltcGxlIHJlYXNvbnMtLS0t aWYgeW91IHRvb2sgdGhlIHRpbWUgdG8gc2F3IHVwIHdvb2QsIG1ha2UgbWV0YWwgZml0dGluZ3MN CmZyb20gcmF3IHNoZWV0IGFuZCB0dWJlIDQxMzAgbWF0ZXJpYWwsIGxlYXJuZWQgaG93IHRvIHdl bGQgYW5kIHJpYiBzdGl0Y2gsICBpZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSBidXJuZWQgeW91ciBmaW5nZXJzIG9uIHJl Y2VudGx5LWdyb3VuZA0KZml0dGluZ3MsIGlmIHlvdSd2ZSBoYWQgVC04OCBpbiBwbGFjZXMgd2hl cmUgeW91IGRpZG4ndCBldmVuIGtub3cgeW91IGhhZCBwbGFjZXMsIGlmIHlvdSd2ZSBjb3VnaGVk IGFsbCBuaWdodCBsb25nIGZyb20gaW5oYWxpbmcgd29vZA0KZHVzdCBwYXJ0aWNsZXMgZnJvbSBz YW5kaW5nLCBpZiB5b3UndmUgaGFkIHRvIGRlY2lkZSB0byB3YWl0IHVudGlsIG5leHQgbW9udGgg b3IgbmV4dCBwYXlkYXkgdG8gYnV5IHR1cm5idWNrbGVzIGJlY2F1c2UgeW91ciBraWRzDQp0dWl0 aW9uIHdhcyBkdWUgb3IgeW91IGhhZCBzb21lIGRlbnRhbCBiaWxscyB0byBwYXkgb3IgeW91IGp1 c3QgdG9vayBvbiBhIGNhciBwYXltZW50LCBpZiB5b3UndmUgdGhvdWdodCBzZXJpb3VzbHkgYWJv dXQgZ2l2aW5nIHVwDQp5b3VyIHByb2plY3QgY29tcGxldGVseSBhbmQganVzdCBzZWxsaW5nIGl0 IG9uIGViYXksIGFuZCBpZiB5b3UndmUgZG9uZSBhbGwgdGhlc2UgdGhpbmdzIHRvIGJ1aWxkIHlv dXIgdmVyeSBvd24gUGlldGVucG9sIHRoZW4gSSBzYXkNCnlvdSBjYW4gcHV0IHdoYXRldmVyIHRo ZSBoZWNrIHlvdSBwbGVhc2Ugb24geW91ciBhaXJwbGFuZSB0byBmaW5pc2ggdGhlIGZhYnJpYy4g ICAgWW91IGNhbiB1c2Ugd2hhdGV2ZXIgZW5naW5lIHlvdSB3YW50LCBNb2RlbCBBLA0KQ29ydmFp ciwgU3ViYXJ1LCBDb250aW5lbnRhbCwgRXZpbnJ1ZGUsIHdvb2QgbGFuZGluZyBnZWFyLCBzdGVl bCBnZWFyLCBDdWIgdGlyZXMsIG1vdG9yY3ljbGUgd2hlZWxzLCBsb25nIGZ1c2VsYWdlLCBzaG9y dCBmdXNlbGFnZSwNCm5vc2UgZnVlbCwgd2luZyBmdWVsLCBib3RoIG5vc2UgYW5kIHdpbmcgZnVl bCwgd2lkZXIgY2VudGVyIHNlY3Rpb24sIGEgY2VudGVyIHNlY3Rpb24gd2l0aCBhIGZsb3Agb3Ig YSBjZW50ZXIgc2VjdGlvbiB3aXRoIGEgY3V0b3V0LA0KYSBjbGlwcGVkIHdpbmcgUGlldGVucG9s LCBvciBldmVuIChhbmQgc29tZSB3aWxsIGdhc3AgYXQgdGhpcyBvbmUpIGJ1aWxkIGEgR3JlZ2Eg R04tMSB0aGVuIHlvdSBoYXZlIGV2ZXJ5IHJpZ2h0IHRvIG1ha2UgZXZlcnkgZGVjaXNpb24NCmFi b3V0IHRoZSBvcHRpb25zIHlvdSBjaG9zZSBmb3IgeW91ciBhaXJwbGFuZS4gICBXaGVuIHBlb3Bs ZSBjb21lIHVwIHRvIG1lIGFuZCBzYXkgIndlbGwgd2h5IGRpZG4ndCB5b3UuLi4uLi4iIG15IGdl bmVyYWwgcmVzcG9uc2UNCmlzICJ3ZWxsIHdoZW4gWU9VIGJ1aWxkIHlvdXIgUGlldGVucG9sLi4u Li5ZT1UgY2FuIGluY29ycG9yYXRlIHRoYXQgaW50byB5b3VyIGFpcnBsYW5lIiBidXQgSSBjaG9z ZSB0byAnZG8gaXQgdGhpcyB3YXknLg0KDQpNaWtlIEMuIGluIE9oaW8NCg0KUFMtLSB0aGVyZSBh cmUgc29tZSBsYXRleCBmaW5pc2hlZCBhaXJwbGFuZXMgb3V0IHRoZXJlIHRoYXQgcmVhbGx5IGRv bid0IGxvb2sgYmFkLi4uLlNoYWQgYW5kIEdhcnkgQmVsbCdzIGEgIHZlcnkgbmljZSBleGFtcGxl IG9mIGEgbGF0ZXgtcGFpbnRlZA0KUGlldCBhbmQgSSBoYWQgdG8gbG9vayB0d2ljZSB1cCBjbG9z ZSBiZWZvcmUgSSByZWFsaXplZCBpdC4uLnNvIGl0IGNhbiBiZSBkb25lLCBpdCBjYW4gc2F2ZSBs b3RzIG9mIG1vbmV5ICh3aGljaCBpcyB2ZXJ5IGFkbWlyYWJsZSBpZiBzYWZldHkgaXMgbm90IGNv bXByb21pc2VkKQ0KYW5kIGl0IGNhbiBsb29rIG9rYXkgIQ0KDQo


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:38:16 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5@comcast.net>
    Subject: Weight does matter but cosmentics of latex ?
    Mike, You certainly covered the gamut, although I notice you left out wood struts and home-made turnbuckles. I am not a tree-hugger. In fact, Lord knows the trees on my property shudder when they see me emerge from my shed with my chainsaw and goalie mask! And I actually spent the night in the hospital from breathing too many paint fumes while working on my Aeronca Sedan. But the building industry, of which I am a part, is becoming fully immersed in Green. Architects are commanded to look for green solutions, and many manufacturers have responded. Just the other night I attended a presentation by Benjamin Moore that focused on this aspect. It was interesting to note that, not only are they solving the VOC issues, but the paints they are now offering are a huge improvement, performance-wise. This is not an endorsement of BM, as I am sure all the major manufacturers have comparable products, but among those improvements are: Greater flexibility, and much greater UV resistance! Both highly desirable for us. The low and zero VOC paints force the manufacturers to look at new solutions to old problems, including how the pigments interact with resins in the paint. Plus, most of these paints are considered 'high build'. That's 3 points for us.what's the down side? In his opinion Mike noted so delicately that Latex ".looks like crap." I am curious, from those on this List that know WAY more about paint than I, what input you may have on the quality of low and zero VOC vs. common latex. Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done, working on fuselage (endless metal parts!) (12 ribs down.) _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC] Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 8:06 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Weight does matter but cosmentics of latex ? Forgive the intrusion good people, (fans of TGWP will recognize that line) but if I might interject a personal opinion about latex finishes: they look like crap. Please allow me to further express my sentiments that I am a staunch supporter of those who use latex paint or any other method to finish the fabric on their airplane or many simple reasons----if you took the time to saw up wood, make metal fittings from raw sheet and tube 4130 material, learned how to weld and rib stitch, if you have burned your fingers on recently-ground fittings, if you've had T-88 in places where you didn't even know you had places, if you've coughed all night long from inhaling wood dust particles from sanding, if you've had to decide to wait until next month or next payday to buy turnbuckles because your kids tuition was due or you had some dental bills to pay or you just took on a car payment, if you've thought seriously about giving up your project completely and just selling it on ebay, and if you've done all these things to build your very own Pietenpol then I say you can put whatever the heck you please on your airplane to finish the fabric. You can use whatever engine you want, Model A, Corvair, Subaru, Continental, Evinrude, wood landing gear, steel gear, Cub tires, motorcycle wheels, long fuselage, short fuselage, nose fuel, wing fuel, both nose and wing fuel, wider center section, a center section with a flop or a center section with a cutout, a clipped wing Pietenpol, or even (and some will gasp at this one) build a Grega GN-1 then you have every right to make every decision about the options you chose for your airplane. When people come up to me and say "well why didn't you......" my general response is "well when YOU build your Pietenpol.....YOU can incorporate that into your airplane" but I chose to 'do it this way'. Mike C. in Ohio PS-- there are some latex finished airplanes out there that really don't look bad....Shad and Gary Bell's a very nice example of a latex-painted Piet and I had to look twice up close before I realized it...so it can be done, it can save lots of money (which is very admirable if safety is not compromised) and it can look okay !


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:47:43 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5@comcast.net>
    Subject: Gary & Shad's motor mount
    Good looking mount, Rick. I especially like your see-thru firewall! You never know when you might need to look in there and see if everything's still in good order. Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done, working on fuselage (endless metal parts!) (12 ribs down.) Do not archive _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Holland Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 6:58 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Gary & Shad's motor mount I went with the mount described in William Wynnes manual, he dedicates around six pages one just building the mount. Rick On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Ryan Mueller <rmueller23@gmail.com> wrote: Shad (or whomever may know), Did you guys go with the motor mount per the Pietenpol plans for your Corvair? I didn't think to make a note of that at Brodhead, and I can't tell definitively in any of my pics. Thanks, Ryan " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:20:37 AM PST US
    From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Weight does matter but cosmentics of latex ?
    Well, well, well, I can't comment on the latex paint stuff, yet; (although my father in law is a retired chemist from Glidden that holds many patents on-his latex works and he will be consulted when I get ready to paint.) - I can say that for the rest of Cuy's post...That's right! It's your pla ne, build how you want and don't let the nay-sayers get in the way. #yiv123243201 .hmmessage P { PADDING-RIGHT:0px;PADDING-LEFT:0px;PADDING-BOTTOM:0px;MARGIN:0px;PADDING-TO P:0px;} #yiv123243201 { FONT-SIZE:10pt;FONT-FAMILY:Verdana;} Forgive the intrusion good people,-(fans of TGWP will recognize that line ) but if I might interject a personal opinion about latex finishes: they look like crap.- - Please allow me to further express my sentiments-that I am a staunch supp orter of those who use latex paint or any other method to finish the fabric on their airplane or many simple reasons----if you took the time to saw up wood, make metal fittings from raw sheet and tube 4130 material,-learned how to weld and rib stitch , -if you have-burned your fingers on recently-ground fittings, if you've had T-88 in places where you didn't even know you had p laces,-if you've coughed all night long from inhaling wood dust particles from-sanding, if you've had to decide to wait until next m onth or next payday to buy turnbuckles because your kids tuition was due or you had some dental bills to-pay or you just took on a car payment, if you've thought seriously about giving up your project completely and just selling it on ebay, and if you've done all these things to build-your very own Pietenpol then I say you can put whatever the heck you please on your airplane to finish the fab ric.--- You can use whatever engine you want, Model A,- Corvair, Subaru, Continental, Evinrude, wood landing gear, steel gear, Cub tires, motorcycle wheels, long fuselage, short fuselage, nose fuel, wing fuel, both nose and wing fuel, wider center-section, a ce nter section with a flop or a center section with a cutout, a clipped wing Pietenpol, or even (and some will gasp at this one) build a Grega GN-1 then you have every right to make every decision about the options you chose for your airplane.-- When people come up to me and say "well why didn't you......" my general response is "well when YOU build your Pietenpol.....YOU can incorporate that into yo ur airplane" but I chose to 'do it this way'.--- - -


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:37:51 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Heel brake pedals
    From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com>
    Ditto Rick On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Lagowski Morrow <jimdeb@charter.net> wrote: > I also used the Bill Rewey toe brake approach. --Jim Lagowski > > Do not archive > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Oscar Zuniga <taildrags@hotmail.com> > *To:* Pietenpol List <pietenpol-list@matronics.com> > *Sent:* Monday, February 09, 2009 11:07 PM > *Subject:* Pietenpol-List: Heel brake pedals > > Air Camper NX41CC has toe brakes exactly like the Bill Rewey > detail and like several others have shown. I really like them. > I used to think that I'd like heel brakes better since that's what > I cut my teeth on in my J-3 Cub training days, but the rudder bar > on the Piet makes it not so easy to deal with heel brakes. The > "Bill Rewey" toe brake setup is simple, effective, and it puts the > brake masters where they are quite easy to inspect and service. > > My other project, the M-19 Flying Squirrel, uses Azusa mechanical > drum brakes and even though I have not flown them yet, I've heard > (and seen for myself) that the drums are quite thin and easy to get > out of round with heavy brake application. I had mine trued up on > a lathe but even so, they are quite lightweight and prone to distortion. > I'd go with Tracy O'Brien modified Azusas (www.TracyObrien.com) on > something the size of a Piet. They are used on KRs and work fine. > > Oscar Zuniga > Air Camper NX41CC > San Antonio, TX > mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com > website at http://www.flysquirrel.net > > * > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c* > > ------------------------------ > - Release Date: 01/30/09 17:31:00 > > * > > * > > -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:02:47 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Gary & Shad's motor mount
    From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com>
    Thanks Gary, you are referring to my "two-piece temporary firewall". Maybe a dumb idea but I figured it would make it easier to figure out all my fuel/electrical/control cable optimum locations and test run the engine and maybe move things around again, etc. Of course I have to remove the engine and mount to install the real firewall but I have to do that anyhow before covering the fuselage. Rick On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Gary Boothe <gboothe5@comcast.net> wrote: > Good looking mount, Rick. I especially like your see-thru firewall! You > never know when you might need to look in there and see if everything's > still in good order. > > > Gary Boothe > > Cool, Ca. > > Pietenpol > > WW Corvair Conversion > > Tail done, working on fuselage (endless metal parts!) > > (12 ribs down=85) > > Do not archive > ------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto: > owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Rick Holland > *Sent:* Saturday, February 14, 2009 6:58 AM > *To:* pietenpol-list@matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: Pietenpol-List: Gary & Shad's motor mount > > > I went with the mount described in William Wynnes manual, he dedicates > around six pages one just building the mount. > > Rick > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Ryan Mueller <rmueller23@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Shad (or whomever may know), > > Did you guys go with the motor mount per the Pietenpol plans for your > Corvair? I didn't think to make a note of that at Brodhead, and I can't t ell > definitively in any of my pics. Thanks, > > Ryan > > * * > > * * > > *" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List* > > *tp://forums.matronics.com* > > *_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution* > > * * > > > -- > Rick Holland > Castle Rock, Colorado > > * > =========== =========== =========== =========== > * > > -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:48:00 AM PST US
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <Michael.D.Cuy@nasa.gov>
    Subject: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger
    Of possible interest: do not archive http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e88PN6V64gk


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:25:18 PM PST US
    From: H RULE <harvey.rule@rogers.com>
    Subject: Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger
    Awsome guy,awsome landing;he was probably the best man for the job having b een a trainer himself.He knew the sequence automatically,that's what traini ng does for you.It has to be automatic because there is no time to think. H aving been in three different sequences myself of having to do an emergency landing and not being far from the ground.You have to look fast and think unbelievably fast and you can't panic or it will kill you.=0A=0A=0Ado not a rchive=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <Michael.D.Cuy@nasa.gov>=0ATo: "pietenpol-list@matron ics.com" <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>=0ASent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:46:10 PM=0ASubject: Pietenpol-List: full interview-- 60 Minutes Intervie w w/ Captain Sullenberger=0A=0A=0A=0AOf possible interest: =0A-=0Ado not archive =0A-=0Ahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e88PN6V64gk=0A-=0A- =====================


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:52:48 PM PST US
    From: "walt" <waltdak@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain
    Sullenberger I've thought of this event since the day that it happened. I came accross the George Washington Bridge about an hour before they ditched in the Hudson. We were in Rockville Centre , Long Island. I guess we all fantisized about being the pilot on that. I only learned of the "ditch button" upon reading the news. The switch that closes all outside openings to make the plane float longer. (but they said he didn't use it) My big question was ,,,they said that the rear cabin doors were kept closed, cause the rear of the plane was sitting low in the water. How did he keep them closed? Did he tell the attendents to not allow them to open? Were they screaming orders? Is there a switch to not allow the rear doors to be opened? I imagine that if the rear cabin doors were/could be opened,,,the plane would have sank quite rapidly. What I got from the 60 Minutes interview is that he did all he could do right,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(and by the look on his face) the rest was just good luck. So many pilots do the right things and the plane cartwheels and breaks apart And after all that,, 50 some odd people die in a crash due to icing. What a shame. do not archive walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC] To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:46 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger Of possible interest: do not archive http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e88PN6V64gk


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:51:41 PM PST US
    From: "Gene Rambo" <generambo@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain
    Sullenberger The flight attendants kept the passengers from opening the doors, not on direction from the front, but their own knowledge and training. There is no switch to prevent it. The only real difference between his landing and a normal landing, technique-wise, was to close the "ditch switch," which he did not do. Gene


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:05:27 PM PST US
    From: "Scott Knowlton " <flyingscott_k@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/Captain
    Sullenberger Good observations Walt. I think every crew member aboard that flight should be credited with keeping their senses about them and carrying out their ditching drills to perfection. I fly in and out of Laguardia as a Captain of an Embraer 190. In fact we were the second arrival into Laguardia after his ditching that day. I have played over Capt Sullenberger and his crew's flawless performance many times in my mind. Control of the cabin doors is out of the flight crews hands and the aircraft commander can only have faith that he/she is blessed with a well trained clearheaded crew in the event of a ditching or aircraft evacuation. As far as our fellow airmen in buffalo, I am sure their actions were as valiant and heroic despite their tragic outcome. Scott Knowlton -----Original Message----- From: walt <waltdak@verizon.net> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger I've thought of this event since the day that it happened. I came accross the George Washington Bridge about an hour before they ditched in the Hudson. We were in Rockville Centre , Long Island. I guess we all fantisized about being the pilot on that. I only learned of the "ditch button" upon reading the news. The switch that closes all outside openings to make the plane float longer. (but they said he didn't use it) My big question was ,,,they said that the rear cabin doors were kept closed, cause the rear of the plane was sitting low in the water. How did he keep them closed? Did he tell the attendents to not allow them to open? Were theyscreaming orders? Is there a switch to not allow the rear doors to be opened? I imagine that if the rear cabin doors were/could be opened,,,the plane would have sank quite rapidly. What I got from the 60 Minutes interview is that he did all he could do right,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(and by the look on his face) the rest was just good luck. So many pilots do the right things and the plane cartwheels and breaks apart And after all that,, 50 some odd people die in a crash due to icing. What a shame. do not archive walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC] <mailto:Michael.D.Cuy@nasa.gov> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:46 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger Of possible interest: do not archive <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e88PN6V64gk> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e88PN6V64gk


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:40:08 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Gary & Shad's motor mount
    From: Ryan Mueller <rmueller23@gmail.com>
    Thanks Rick. I guess I must have missed that section, or forgot it was there. I went back through and found what you were referring to, and reread it. Could you descibe roughly the process you used to mock yours up? Ryan On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com> wrote: > I went with the mount described in William Wynnes manual, he dedicates > around six pages one just building the mount. > > Rick > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:35:15 PM PST US
    From: "Gene & Tammy" <zharvey@bentoncountycable.net>
    Subject: Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger
    OR , you can just fly the plane, fly the plane, fly the plane. If there had been a crowded ferry on the river the FAA would have listed the crash as Pilot Error and the pilot wouldn't have been a hero. Life isn't always fair. Just my two cents worth Gene in Windy Tennessee ----- Original Message ----- From: H RULE To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:24 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger Awsome guy,awsome landing;he was probably the best man for the job having been a trainer himself.He knew the sequence automatically,that's what training does for you.It has to be automatic because there is no time to think. Having been in three different sequences myself of having to do an emergency landing and not being far from the ground.You have to look fast and think unbelievably fast and you can't panic or it will kill you. do not archive ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <Michael.D.Cuy@nasa.gov> To: "pietenpol-list@matronics.com" <pietenpol-list@matronics.com> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:46:10 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger Of possible interest: do not archive http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e88PN6V64gk 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Checked by AVG. 12:00 AM


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:02:45 PM PST US
    From: "walt" <waltdak@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain
    Sullenberger So true. walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Gene & Tammy To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 7:34 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger OR , you can just fly the plane, fly the plane, fly the plane. If there had been a crowded ferry on the river the FAA would have listed the crash as Pilot Error and the pilot wouldn't have been a hero. Life isn't always fair. Just my two cents worth Gene in Windy Tennessee ----- Original Message ----- From: H RULE To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:24 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger Awsome guy,awsome landing;he was probably the best man for the job having been a trainer himself.He knew the sequence automatically,that's what training does for you.It has to be automatic because there is no time to think. Having been in three different sequences myself of having to do an emergency landing and not being far from the ground.You have to look fast and think unbelievably fast and you can't panic or it will kill you. do not archive ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <Michael.D.Cuy@nasa.gov> To: "pietenpol-list@matronics.com" <pietenpol-list@matronics.com> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:46:10 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: full interview-- 60 Minutes Interview w/ Captain Sullenberger Of possible interest: do not archive http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e88PN6V64gk 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List"'>http://www .matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D href='3D"http://forums.matronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.c om/contribution 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- 2/11/2009 12:00 AM


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:02:45 PM PST US
    From: "walt" <waltdak@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: to fly or build?
    Scott, Where are you building? In NJ? walt evans NX140DL ----- Original Message ----- From: Scott Knowlton To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 9:39 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: to fly or build? Tom, I suppose all of us share your dilemna of trying to justify the time and expense that we devote to our passion for flying. If I can add my two cents here, I am a professional pilot who was in your position with a fresh IFR ticket and plans to build a Piet over 12 years ago (with a two year old son in toe). My instrument rating was to be my meal ticket so there was no question of whether that was going to lapse or not. This being the case, some of my ambitious plans had to be temporarily shelved in favour of my work and family obligations. Life went on, I moved ahead in my flying career but the Piet consisted of a mailing tube with a couple of dusty manuals in my workshop. Beaming ahead, my son (having grown to nine years old) and I drove to and camped at Brodhead. With a little more time on my hands and a little better disposable income, I felt I could "unshelve" my Piet plans and start the building process. The tradition of Brodhead continued for the past five years and for my boy and I it is truly a father and son bonding experience. We listen to William Wynn's inspiring, "Get in the Arena" presentations, go for an annual ride in a Piet with Chuck G, take lots of pictures and stay up late by the fire listening to different builders and flyers of my favorite little airplane. As far as building goes, we have made a rib jig and about 14 cool looking ribs. I don't have much to show for my 12 years of effort but that's OK. We all have this burden called life that we have to contend with and it takes a certain amount of drive out of our passion. I suppose I divide things into two categories; things I need to do and things I'd like to do. I need to go to work, pay my bills, watch my boy's football games, take my bride on holidays and save for my retirement. The Piet falls into the like to do category that tends to slide forward anytime a need to do gets in the way. Nevertheless, I think I will fly my bird to Brodhead one day (or maybe share the trip trading places with my son in the chase car...) but it would only be a frustration to put a date or year on when the event will transpire. In the meantime, my project is something that I attend to when I want to relax or spend some quality time with my boy. Most things that we do have a timeline attached to them and these deadlines are the stress inducers in life. I don't want my piet project to be lumped into that category. Aviation is an expesnsive hobby and one which should be approached with a focus if someone has to budget time and money (which most of us do). Your IFR ticket, unless you use it very frequently will probably become a burden if you chose to keep it current. It will take you away from your family and the return (the ability to fly in less than VFR weather conditions) probably won't be worth the investment. Your pietenpol, however, is a project of so many different aspects that it could very easily reflect the different phases of your life (slow progress while your family is young - perhaps a late hour or two in the shop after the youngsters are asleep) with an increase in activity as your family grows seeing you spend time with your kids in the shop. No chore of building here, just relaxation and enjoyment as the parts and pieces of your airplane are slowly manufactured. In sum, I think your project would be much easier to dust off and get back into than a rating which really isn't necessary to be proficient at unless you have a huge need to go somewhere anytime in any weather ("any wheather" should be taken loosely unless you fly a bird equipped for known ice, have a good weather radar, oxygen or pressurization......). Basic VFR flying skills are something you will always have and dusting those off would consist of a fun five our checkout in a champ or cub in preparation for the maiden flight of your piet! Just my thoughts on your situation. Scott Knowlton ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: tmbrant@msn.com To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: to fly or build? Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:55:30 -0600 I know, it's been a topic here before, but I wanted to share a dilemma I'm facing currently and get others opinions. First off, I'm a private, instrument rated pilot with about 350 hours. In recent years, I've really had to cut my flying back to probably less than 20 hours/year, mostly due to finances. I'm beginning to question whether this is enough to stay safe, especially in the IFR environment. I don't have a lot of cloud time, in fact it was only a year ago that I got the IFR rating. Trouble is, I don't really go anywhere - how can I when I only fly an hour or so a month? For similar reasons (finance and time) I've let my Pietenpol project sit for about 2-3 years without touching it. I've got the fuselage about 2/3 complete, wing ribs done, tail section is 90% complete and I've gathered most of the components for the corvair engine conversion. I really want to work on it, but I can't really afford to do much each month with regards to finances and mostly lack of time (I have a 2 year old). I'm considering stopping flying altogether so that the money I am investing in flying is being invested into my Pietenpol. My fear is, that if I do stop flying, that I may never get back into it, and if I do, I would never feel confortable flying IFR again with such a "break". My 2 year old is real smart but very impatient, so I'm not sure if he's ready to start hanging around in the shop with me, unless I'm doing real basic stuff. Not that I'm afraid to run saw around him, just that he'd pick up two newly glued pieces of wood, right out of a jig and run around with it like a toy - oh to be young... The best rough guess I have to finish my Piet is about $5000-$7000, which would take a few years (at the rate I've been flying) to come up with. At this rate, I probably spend about $2500/year on flying. Other than the obvious motivations for completing the Piet is some of my families health. I really want to complete it and have them see if fly before they "go" and they want that too. Obviously, we never know if we'll see tomorrow so it may be a worthless goal to chase after but it is what it is. Anyway, thanks for listening to me rant. I would appreciate any opinions / recommendations of people who've faced similar situations. Tom B. ww.matronics.com/contribution st">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List ronics.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:28:44 PM PST US
    From: shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: to fly or build?
    Build when you have time to build.- Money is not too big of a problem wit h a piet.(all at once any ways)- $100-$200 of raw materials will take a w hile to use up on some early stages of building, ribs tail etc.- I know a n-IFR rating sounds fun and exciting, but unless it makes, or saves you m oney on travel it is very seldom worth the time and money to keep current. - Don't get me wrong, it can save you butt in a tight situation,-but- when Pilots have to use thier supperior skills to keep them selves or the airplane intact, chances are they made an inferrior-judgement call before they got into that situation.- If IFR is your passion follow it, if buil ding is, follow it.- I know how kids can slow progress as well.- I just had my 1st 2 months ago and finding time to work out in the hanger is hard to come by, but I try to make the best of the time available.- I go out to the shop the night before for 5-10 min and plan out ahead of time what t o do with my next shop time.- Think about it that night, do it all in your he ad then go out and do it for real, 1 little project at a time.- Try not t o look at the whole airplane as the project, but rather that rib you have t o build, or some gussets you need to cut out, or a few pieces of steel that need dressed out.- One by one they add up and one day all the sudden it' s an airplane.- And for your thought of wanting your aging or sick family member to be able to see it fly, I can relate.- My grand father(now in h is 80's)-started a Cassutt back in the 70's and I have it now,- I would love for him to be able to see it fly, but it all comes in due time.- Ju st remember that you are building because you want to, not because they wan t you to.- They would surely not want you to rush, and possibly do some t hing that could hurt you or kill you.- Bassically, You have to make up yo ur mind as to what path to follow.- Building a Piet is surely a reachable goal, even on a low buddget.- It will take many years and many hours to do it but for most homebuilders, it's as much about the journy of building as it is about getting to the flying of your creation.- (But flying it IS THE ICING ON THE CAKE!).- - Shad - P.S.- A piet is I.F.R.R.R.........I follow roads, rivers, and railroads =0A=0A=0A


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:42:47 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Gary & Shad's motor mount
    From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com>
    Hello Ryan I first built and welded the tray and spools on a flat surface, then you just need a jig to hold the tray where you want it in front of the firewall. This is where that big ash firewall cross member (that you thought was of no use unless you are using a Model A engine) came in handy. Just clamped a 1x4 to it (with the fuselage upside down) and clamped the tray to the 1x4 where I needed the engine to be to make CG, then cut and welded the rest of the tubing (see attached pics). Good luck Rick On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Ryan Mueller <rmueller23@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Rick. I guess I must have missed that section, or forgot it was > there. I went back through and found what you were referring to, and reread > it. Could you descibe roughly the process you used to mock yours up? > > Ryan > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I went with the mount described in William Wynnes manual, he dedicates >> around six pages one just building the mount. >> >> Rick >> >> > * > > > * > > -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --