Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:04 AM - Re: Flying an Idea (Ben Charvet)
     2. 08:26 AM - Re: Gross weight rating and modifications... (Dick N.)
     3. 09:18 AM - Re: Re: Corvair Engine Donation (amsafetyc@aol.com)
     4. 02:09 PM - Re: great info Bill Church--- 0-200 powered Piets (jordanlcarr)
     5. 04:38 PM - Re: Re: great info Bill Church--- 0-200 powered Piets (airlion@bellsouth.net)
     6. 04:41 PM - Bill Emo photo attached (John Egan)
     7. 05:13 PM - Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 23 Msgs - 06/05/09 (Craig Lawler)
     8. 05:13 PM - Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 23 Msgs - 06/05/09 (Craig Lawler)
     9. 05:33 PM - group osh arrival plans? (shad bell)
    10. 06:19 PM - Re: Flying an Idea (Rick Holland)
    11. 06:21 PM - Re: Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 23 Msgs - 06/05/09 (Mark Roberts)
    12. 06:43 PM - Front fuselage covering (Rick Holland)
    13. 06:52 PM - Re: group osh arrival plans? (gcardinal)
    14. 07:17 PM - Re: group osh arrival plans? (gcardinal)
    15. 07:33 PM - Barber Fly-in (Don Emch)
    16. 07:41 PM - Corvair vs. O-200 weight comparision (Rick Holland)
    17. 07:41 PM - Re: Bill Emo photo attached (Jeff Boatright)
    18. 07:41 PM - Re: group osh arrival plans? (Jeff Boatright)
    19. 08:02 PM - Re: Corvair vs. O-200 weight comparision (Rick Holland)
    20. 08:23 PM - Re: great info Bill Church--- 0-200 powered Piets (jordanlcarr)
    21. 08:38 PM - Re: group osh arrival plans? (gcardinal)
    22. 08:45 PM - Re: Bill Emo photo attached (jordanlcarr)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flying an Idea | 
      
      
      Beautiful artwork!  I'd definitely like one, so be sure to post ordering 
      information.
      
      Ben Charvet
      NX866BC registration complete!
      
      John Hofmann wrote:
      > Fellow Pietephiles:
      >
      > As Brodhead, that other flyin in Wisconsin and the 80th Celebration 
      > fast approach, I have started to design my T-Shirts which the "Bratmen 
      > of Brodhead" will be sporting this year. I thought I would take a stab 
      > at another design or two for the masses. Let me know if there is any 
      > interest and I will put them up on CafePress and you can order as many 
      > as you want to wear. Also I can customize the photo in the middle 
      > pretty easily if you don't like Mike Cuy. I actually think he is okay 
      > considering he is one of my greatest friends. Let me know what you 
      > think or contact me off list at johnnyskyrocket@me.com 
      > <mailto:johnnyskyrocket@me.com>
      >
      > -john-
      >
      > John Hofmann
      > Vice-President, Information Technology
      > The Rees Group, Inc.
      > 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800
      > Madison, WI 53718
      > Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150
      > Fax: 608.443.2474
      > Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com <mailto:jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Gross weight rating and modifications... | 
      
      Great post Jack.  I like your suggestions, but wonder a bit about the 
      effects of adding 6 ft. to the span. On my radial Piet,I made the center 
      section 1 ft wider and the wing panels to plan which increased the span 
      by 1 ft.  Having said that, in my flight tests, I found a huge 
      difference in flying at 1250 lbs and 1310 lbs.  Even with 110 hp it 
      struggled a bit.  I haven't tried it again with my new prop, built for 
      climb, but I don't expect that much of a change.
      At 1250 lb
      empty    810
      me         200   
      pass      170
      fuel        70   2/3 tank   108 full
      Dick N.
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Jack Phillips 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 4:15 PM
        Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Gross weight rating and modifications...
      
      
        Mark,
      
         
      
        You got a lot of replies but little infornation.  I'll try to answer 
      your questions:
      
         
      
        You as the builder can specify whatever gross weight you desire.  If 
      you want to say your Pietenpol can fly at 1400 lbs, nobody can stop you. 
       I believe the plans say 1050, but that makes it pretty much useless as 
      a two seat aircraft, since even lightweight Pietenpols tend to weigh in 
      the 600 - 630 lb range.  If your empty weight is 600, by the time you 
      add a useful amount of fuel (at least 10 gallons) you are up to 660.  
      You (255) and your wife (150) with full fuel will put you at 1065, and 
      that is with NO baggage, no handheld radio (unless you included it in 
      your empty weight).  The plane will fly well at that weight.
      
         
      
        Mine is one of the heavier Pietenpols at 745 lbs empty.  There are a 
      number of reasons, some of which I would do again (I like having 
      comfortable seats, and instruments in the front panel - they are easier 
      for me to read than the ones in the rear panel).  I set my gross weight 
      so that if I flew with full fuel, and myself and my wife I would be 
      right at gross.  With me by myself and full fuel, I'm pretty close to 
      that 1050 figure, and the plane flies very well.
      
         
      
        Empty Wt         745
      
        Full Fuel            90
      
        Me                    200
      
        Wife                  160
      
        Total -               1195
      
         
      
        I set my Gross weight as 1200, but then I did a few basic stress 
      calculations to convince myself that the wing was actually strong enough 
      to withstand 4.8 G's (3.2 G's with a 50% safety factor).  I feel 1200 is 
      really pushing it for this airplane.  I've flown it at that weight, but 
      it feels very heavy and won't climb well.  At Brodhead, I will not carry 
      any passenger that weighs over 175 (runway's too short).  Fortunately, 
      that tends to limit my passengers to young attractive females.
      
         
      
        If you don't want to lose some weight (and we're not talking 5 lbs 
      here), then you will need to build your plane as light as possible.  I 
      can give you some suggestions, which may or may not be feasible for you:
      
         
      
          1.. Don't make the fuselage any wider.  Every inch of extra width 
      requires more spruce, more plywood, more fabric, and more paint.  And 
      more money. 
          2.. Add about 4 to 6 feet to the wingspan.  That would put it on par 
      with a Piper Cub, and would decrease the wing loading.  The longer wing 
      will weigh a bit more but will lift a lot more.  Six feet would add 20% 
      to the wing area. 
          3.. Build the standard fuselage - not the "Long" fuselage.  People 
      will tell you you can't put a Continental on a short fuselage, but 
      somehow Mike Cuy managed to do so and his Piet (632 lbs) flies very well 
      and looks beautiful 
          4.. Build the "Improved" (don't say "Cub-Style", since it predated 
      the Cub by about 5 years) landing gear, not the straight axle wire wheel 
      type.  The straight axle is heavy, and wire wheels are very strong (and 
      look cool), but if they were light race cars would still be running 
      them. 
          5.. The steel tube fuselage is considerably lighter than the wood 
      fuselage 
          6.. Build with sitka spruce, not douglas fir.  Fir is stronger, but 
      heavier.  If you use fir, each piece can be resized somewhat smaller to 
      take advantage of the strength and to try to lose some of the extra 
      weight.  Spruce has the best strength to weight ratio of any wood except 
      balsa.  
          7.. Use mahogany instead of birch plywood.  
          8.. Use Resorcinol instead of T-88.  Lighter and stronger, but much 
      more difficult to use 
          9.. Use lightweight (uncertified) dacron fabric, not the medium 
      weight that everyone says you need - not only is the fabric lighter, but 
      it requires less coating material (whether dope, polybrush or whatever 
      the Stewart System uses).  For Heaven's sake, don't use polyurethane 
      paint (60 lbs of my plane's 745 lbs are in paint).  Walt Evans used the 
      lightweight fabric on his, and his plane is the lightest Piet I know of 
      (595 lbs). 
          10.. Obviously, avoid adding radios, electrical systems, starters, 
      in-flight movies, de-icing boots and retractable landing gear.  You 
      might suggest your wife fly naked - ladies clothes are notoriously heavy 
      
         
      
        I kept a spreadsheet where I recorded the weight of every piece that 
      went on my plane, along with its position with respect to a datum on the 
      airframe, so I wasn't totally surprised by my high empty weight.  
      However, I was more than a bit ticked off when I weighed the fuselage, 
      wings and tail after painting and realized how much that polyurethane 
      with its nice glossy finish cost me.  By then it was too late, unless I 
      wanted to re-cover and repaint the entire airplane.
      
         
      
        All in all, it might be easier (and healthier) for you to lose 75 lbs 
      than to do all these things.  I've lost 75 lbs this year - 
      unfortunately, I've lost the same 5lbs 15times.
      
         
      
        Good Luck and hope to see you at Brodhead next month,
      
         
      
        Jack Phillips
      
        NX899JP
      
        Raleigh, NC
      
         
      
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      -----
      
        From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark 
      Roberts
        Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:22 PM
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Gross weight rating and modifications...
      
         
      
        Hey All:
      
         
      
        I have been looking for some of the weight specs for the Piet, and 
      have a couple of questions.
      
         
      
        I would like to have something closer to 1200 lbs total gross weight 
      for the plane. I think I saw on a website I found tonight that the gross 
      was at somewhere around 1050. I've only found one site that lists the 
      Piet's specs, and as I am 255 or so, I want to know if I can fly this 
      bird with my 150 lb wife and an over night bag...
      
         
      
        May be a great reason for the stomach by-pass surgery and a tummy 
      tuck, but crud, if I'm gonna spend that much money I should get a kit 
      plane :o\
      
         
      
        Is the gross weight established by the 'designer' or by the builder 
      based on having a corvair engine vs. the 65 hp types when the builder 
      registers it with the FAA...
      
         
      
        Thanks for the clairification and help!
      
         
      
        Mark
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics.
      comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution 
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Corvair Engine Donation | 
      
      
      You re not gonna believe this one. A good friend of mine invited me to stay at
      his place last night. Where??? In Rockhall naturally. You know hang out go on
      the boat, drink eat and enjoy. Among his boats is a 21 foot Chriscraft runabout.
      I love it also did some engine work on it for him 2 summers ago. Good friend
      great house and kool toys. 
      
      John
      ------Original Message------
      From: chase143
      Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      ReplyTo: Pietenpol builders Board
      Sent: Jun 5, 2009 11:49 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Corvair Engine Donation
      
      
      John,
      Forgot to mention. We've camped at assateague before, beautiful. Just make sure
      your food is secure or the wild horse will get into it, seriously. If you have
      time, we are on the "mainland", 25 miles south of Annapolis. Feel free to stop
      by and provide feedback on my fuselage progress. We will be at the antique
      boat show in Rock Hall sometime over the weekend. Give us a try. cell 240-678-8371
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247051#247051
      
      
      Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: great info Bill Church--- 0-200 powered Piets | 
      
      
      Hi all, 
      
           My name is Jordan Carr and I am Bill Emo's grandson. However, he unfortunately
      passed on Feb. 6 of 2009. I just wanted to let everyone know. I am a pilot
      myself and was taught mostly in part by Papa. He was a great teacher and sparked
      my passion for aviation when I was a young child. I was able to assist him
      in some of the building process of his Piet and have flown many hours in good
      ole 58TL. If you have any questions I can do my best to try and answer them.
      
      
      -Jordan
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247113#247113
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: great info Bill Church--- 0-200 powered Piets | 
      
      
        tell us more about your piet
      -------------- Original message ----------------------
      From: "jordanlcarr" <jordan.carr.17@gmail.com>
      >
      > 
      > Hi all, 
      > 
           My name is Jordan Carr and I am Bill Emo's grandson. However, he 
      unfortunately passed on Feb. 6 of 2009. I just wanted to let everyone know. I am
      
      a pilot myself and was taught mostly in part by Papa. He was a great teacher and
      
      sparked my passion for aviation when I was a young child. I was able to assist
      
      him in some of the building process of his Piet and have flown many hours in 
      good ole 58TL. If you have any questions I can do my best to try and answer 
      > them.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > -Jordan
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247113#247113
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Bill Emo photo attached | 
      
      Attached, is a photo of Bill Emo at Brodhead-2008. He shared his enthusia
      sm, knowledge-and gave rides.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A_____________________________
      ___=0AFrom: jordanlcarr <jordan.carr.17@gmail.com>=0ATo: pietenpol-list@mat
      ronics.com=0ASent: Saturday, June 6, 2009 4:09:00 PM=0ASubject: Pietenpol-L
      ist: Re: great info Bill Church--- 0-200 powered Piets=0A=0A--> Pietenpol-L
      ist message posted by: "jordanlcarr" <jordan.carr.17@gmail.com>=0A=0AHi all
      , =0A=0A- - My name is Jordan Carr and I am Bill Emo's grandson. Howeve
      r, he unfortunately passed on Feb. 6 of 2009. I just wanted to let everyone
       know. I am a pilot myself and was taught mostly in part by Papa. He was a 
      great teacher and sparked my passion for aviation when I was a young child.
       I was able to assist him in some of the building process of his Piet and h
      ave flown many hours in good ole 58TL. If you have any questions I can do m
      y best to try and answer them.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A-Jordan=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ARead 
      this topic online here:=0A=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=
      ====0A=0A=0A      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 23 Msgs - 06/05/09 | 
      
      
      Mark,
      
      I have a C-85 Piet and have been hauling anyone that can get in the  
      front seat. I weigh 170 and fly regularly with a friend that goes  
      about 230 in the front seat. I wouldn't do that on a short runway,  
      but the piet seems to do fine and I am comfortable off 1500 or 1800ft  
      as long as it's not real hot out. Last weekend this guy and I flew  
      off a 1600ft strip when it was about 78. There are some wires at the  
      end of the runway at 15ft or so and I had another 50ft or so  
      clearance. I don't think it is possible to get anyone any bigger in.  
      We just about have to grease Jeff up to get him out. According to the  
      engineering work I saw somewhere years ago, with jury struts the Piet  
      is good for 6g's positive and 3 negative. I don't think I'm worried  
      about breaking it. I did get rid of a Sensenisch prop and am using a  
      74-37 Culver from Valley Engineering that is a lot more efficient.
      
      Craig Lawler
      NX899CL
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 23 Msgs - 06/05/09 | 
      
      
      Mark,
      
      I have a C-85 Piet and have been hauling anyone that can get in the  
      front seat. I weigh 170 and fly regularly with a friend that goes  
      about 230 in the front seat. I wouldn't do that on a short runway,  
      but the piet seems to do fine and I am comfortable off 1500 or 1800ft  
      as long as it's not real hot out. Last weekend this guy and I flew  
      off a 1600ft strip when it was about 78. There are some wires at the  
      end of the runway at 15ft or so and I had another 50ft or so  
      clearance. I don't think it is possible to get anyone any bigger in.  
      We just about have to grease Jeff up to get him out. According to the  
      engineering work I saw somewhere years ago, with jury struts the Piet  
      is good for 6g's positive and 3 negative. I don't think I'm worried  
      about breaking it. I did get rid of a Sensenisch prop and am using a  
      74-37 Culver from Valley Engineering that is a lot more efficient.
      
      Craig Lawler
      NX899CL
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | group osh arrival plans? | 
      
      Hello guys,- Have we reached any decision on where the mass arrival stagi
      ng airport will be?- I bought my charts today and had to start drawing co
      urse lines on them out of excitment.- I will want to make at least 1 fuel
       stop enroute from C37 to OSH,- I only have about 1.5 hr range with a res
      erve, and don't want to have to fly out of the way to refuel should we get 
      stuck holding over the lakes.- Dodge County Airport looked like a decent 
      place for a final fuel stop.- Any of you Cheese Heads have any advise on 
      this?- I recall someone on here mentioned Steve Krogg's airport as a fina
      l stop enroute.- Where is Krogg's, Waupun?- Also wondering what most of
       you OSH bound guys were going to do for lodging/camping.- Dad is most li
      kely going to drive his truck up from Brodhead on sun morning, and we might
       be able to help carry some cargo up, let me know if this is needed.- We 
      might also want to assign, voulenteer to bring some cooking gear, ie grill,
       cooler,-plates plasticware etc, so we can hang out and eat something che
      aper than a 25 dollar slice of pizza, or a 18 dollar hotdog.- Anyone with
       any other ideas let's here them so we can plan ahead of time.- 
      -
      Shad
      P.S.- Don, or Mike C., did you go to the Barber fly-in today?- I was at
       work
      -=0A=0A=0A      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Flying an Idea | 
      
      Beautiful work John, I am interested.
      
      
      rick
      
      On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:51 PM, John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>wrote:
      
      > Fellow Pietephiles:
      > As Brodhead, that other flyin in Wisconsin and the 80th Celebration fast
      > approach, I have started to design my T-Shirts which the "Bratmen of
      > Brodhead" will be sporting this year. I thought I would take a stab at
      > another design or two for the masses. Let me know if there is any interest
      > and I will put them up on CafePress and you can order as many as you want to
      > wear. Also I can customize the photo in the middle pretty easily if you
      > don't like Mike Cuy. I actually think he is okay considering he is one of my
      > greatest friends. Let me know what you think or contact me off list at
      > johnnyskyrocket@me.com
      >
      > -john-
      >
      > John Hofmann
      > Vice-President, Information Technology
      > The Rees Group, Inc.
      > 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800
      > Madison, WI 53718
      > Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150
      > Fax: 608.443.2474
      > Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol-List Digest: 23 Msgs - 06/05/09 | 
      
      
      Thanks Craig...
      
      I have been losing and finding the same 20 or so pounds for years and
      if I have to get serious about keeping it off. I have motivation to
      lose it with this project!
      
      Thanks for the advice. I live in a hot area (Fresno CA) where avg
      temperatures in the summer are in the high 90's. Fortunately we have a
      big runway and I have a while to lose the pounds :oD
      
      Thanks for the info. I do wish there was about 100 pounds left over
      for me to find a bit of 'wiggle' room...
      Mark
      
      On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Craig Lawler<clawler@ptd.net> wrote:
      >
      > Mark,
      >
      > I have a C-85 Piet and have been hauling anyone that can get in the front
      > seat. I weigh 170 and fly regularly with a friend that goes about 230 in the
      > front seat. I wouldn't do that on a short runway, but the piet seems to do
      > fine and I am comfortable off 1500 or 1800ft as long as it's not real hot
      > out. Last weekend this guy and I flew off a 1600ft strip when it was about
      > 78. There are some wires at the end of the runway at 15ft or so and I had
      > another 50ft or so clearance. I don't think it is possible to get anyone any
      > bigger in. We just about have to grease Jeff up to get him out. According to
      > the engineering work I saw somewhere years ago, with jury struts the Piet is
      > good for 6g's positive and 3 negative. I don't think I'm worried about
      > breaking it. I did get rid of a Sensenisch prop and am using a 74-37 Culver
      > from Valley Engineering that is a lot more efficient.
      >
      > Craig Lawler
      > NX899CL
      >
      >
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Front fuselage covering | 
      
      I am covering my firewall with a .016 stainless (as shown in the attached
      pictures), can the front of the fueslage be covered with the stainless sheet
      attached? Or must the fabric be wrapped and glued to the wood firewall and
      then the stainless reattached?
      
      Thanks
      
      Rick
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: group osh arrival plans? | 
      
      The staging airport is Waupun. More details will be in the July 
      newsletter.
      
      I will post more info here over the next few days.
      
      Greg C.
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: shad bell 
        To: Pietenpol Discussion 
        Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 7:27 PM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: group osh arrival plans?
      
      
              Hello guys,  Have we reached any decision on where the mass 
      arrival staging airport will be?  I bought my charts today and had to 
      start drawing course lines on them out of excitment.  I will want to 
      make at least 1 fuel stop enroute from C37 to OSH,  I only have about 
      1.5 hr range with a reserve, and don't want to have to fly out of the 
      way to refuel should we get stuck holding over the lakes.  Dodge County 
      Airport looked like a decent place for a final fuel stop.  Any of you 
      Cheese Heads have any advise on this?  I recall someone on here 
      mentioned Steve Krogg's airport as a final stop enroute.  Where is 
      Krogg's, Waupun?  Also wondering what most of you OSH bound guys were 
      going to do for lodging/camping.  Dad is most likely going to drive his 
      truck up from Brodhead on sun morning, and we might be able to help 
      carry some cargo up, let me know if this is needed.  We might also want 
      to assign, voulenteer to bring some cooking gear, ie grill, cooler, 
      plates plasticware etc, so we can hang out and eat something cheaper 
      than a 25 dollar slice of pizza, or a 18 dollar hotdog.  Anyone with any 
      other ideas let's here them so we can plan ahead of time.  
      
              Shad
              P.S.  Don, or Mike C., did you go to the Barber fly-in today?  I 
      was at work
             
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: group osh arrival plans? | 
      
      Brodhead to Oshkosh - 2009
      
      
      Flying -
      
      Those with radios may elect to fly direct to OSH as individual flights.
      
      For the rest of us we'll depart Brodhead early Sunday morning and fly to 
      our staging area at Waupun, WI. Waupun (WI07) is a private airstrip 2 
      miles SE of the town of Waupun with an E - W grass strip and a N - S 
      paved strip located 67 miles on a course of 23 degrees from Brodhead. 
      GPS coordinates are 43 37 19.96N 88 46 0.39W Elevation 940' with right 
      traffic for rwy 09.
      
      We will depart Waupun in 3 - 4 ship gaggles per OSH tower instructions. 
      Gaggle assignments will be discussed further at Brodhead.
      
      
      Nordo phone calls to the tower need to be made between 7:00 - 10:00 am 
      and within 45 minutes of your arrival in the OSH pattern. These calls 
      will need to be made from our staging airport so plan to leave Brodhead 
      accordingly.
      
      
      The NOTAM for Airventure can be found on the EAA website. 
      
      
      At Oshkosh -
      
      EAA has arranged parking for us by the Homebuilder's Headquarters. We 
      will be able to camp just west of our airplanes in the campground.
      
      Bill Rewey may also have camping room in the wooded area.
      
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: gcardinal 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 8:51 PM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: group osh arrival plans?
      
      
        The staging airport is Waupun. More details will be in the July 
      newsletter.
      
        I will post more info here over the next few days.
      
        Greg C.
      
      
        ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: shad bell 
          To: Pietenpol Discussion 
          Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 7:27 PM
          Subject: Pietenpol-List: group osh arrival plans?
      
      
                Hello guys,  Have we reached any decision on where the mass 
      arrival staging airport will be?  I bought my charts today and had to 
      start drawing course lines on them out of excitment.  I will want to 
      make at least 1 fuel stop enroute from C37 to OSH,  I only have about 
      1.5 hr range with a reserve, and don't want to have to fly out of the 
      way to refuel should we get stuck holding over the lakes.  Dodge County 
      Airport looked like a decent place for a final fuel stop.  Any of you 
      Cheese Heads have any advise on this?  I recall someone on here 
      mentioned Steve Krogg's airport as a final stop enroute.  Where is 
      Krogg's, Waupun?  Also wondering what most of you OSH bound guys were 
      going to do for lodging/camping.  Dad is most likely going to drive his 
      truck up from Brodhead on sun morning, and we might be able to help 
      carry some cargo up, let me know if this is needed.  We might also want 
      to assign, voulenteer to bring some cooking gear, ie grill, cooler, 
      plates plasticware etc, so we can hang out and eat something cheaper 
      than a 25 dollar slice of pizza, or a 18 dollar hotdog.  Anyone with any 
      other ideas let's here them so we can plan ahead of time.  
      
                Shad
                P.S.  Don, or Mike C., did you go to the Barber fly-in today?  
      I was at work
               
      
      
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat
      ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Hey Shad,
      
      Yeah, I made it to the Barber Fly-in.  I went over last night (Friday) with my
      oldest daughter and we tented it by the plane.  Beautiful night for camping! 
      We had breakfast, hung out for a while, hopped a couple rides, then headed for
      home in the early afternoon.  They had a pretty nice turn out.  Dozens of airplanes
      and lots of Corvairs (the ground bound kind).  Frank Pavliga had both of
      his Piets flying too.  Almost had a Piet Fly-in!
      
      Don Emch
      NX899DE
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247147#247147
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Corvair vs. O-200 weight comparision | 
      
      Concerning the discussion a couple days ago about the weight of an O-200
      compared to a Corvair, in the new June Sport Aviation is a Teledyne
      Continental ad (page 73) for their new O200D (lighter weight model) which
      they say weights 199 lbs and goes on to say that that is 25 lbs lighter than
      the O200. That puts the O200 at 224 lbs. which I assume does not include
      exhaust (and oil). When doing a preliminary W&B to figure out how long to
      make the motor mount for my Corvair WW told me to figure 240 lbs. for my
      engine ready to run including exhaust, starter, magneto, oil, and wood prop.
      
      And concerning the crankshaft breakage problems interestingly enough in the
      same magazine is an Ercoupe article with a picture of an Ercoupe in a bean
      field the victim of a C-85 with a broken crank (page 57). Reading articles
      like this in addition to articles concerning the Lycoming crankshaft class
      action lawsuits:
      
      http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/leadnews/lycoming_crankshaft_lawsuit_193160-1.html
      http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/briefs/Lycoming_Crankshaft_Lawsuit_193841-1.html
      
      (give me a break, 5000 defective crankshafts in new engines people are
      paying $25,000 to $40,000 for?), I am no more concerned about breaking a
      nitrided Corvair crank with a 5th bearing than I am breaking the crank on an
      O200 that I bought used and hope never had a prop strike.
      
      Rick
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Bill Emo photo attached | 
      
      
      Bill sure did share his enthusiasm. Thanks for the photo John. 
      Jordan, I'm sorry for you loss.
      
      >Attached, is a photo of Bill Emo at Brodhead 2008. He shared his 
      >enthusiasm, knowledge and gave rides.
      >
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: group osh arrival plans? | 
      
      Is the turf runway useable?
      
      
      >The staging airport is Waupun. More details will be in the July newsletter.
      >
      >I will post more info here over the next few days.
      >
      >Greg C.
      >
      >
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Corvair vs. O-200 weight comparision | 
      
      Opps, sorry I meant to say "dynamo" not "magneto" in that last sentence in
      the first paragraph.
      
      rick
      
      On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com> wrote:
      
      > Concerning the discussion a couple days ago about the weight of an O-200
      > compared to a Corvair, in the new June Sport Aviation is a Teledyne
      > Continental ad (page 73) for their new O200D (lighter weight model) which
      > they say weights 199 lbs and goes on to say that that is 25 lbs lighter than
      > the O200. That puts the O200 at 224 lbs. which I assume does not include
      > exhaust (and oil). When doing a preliminary W&B to figure out how long to
      > make the motor mount for my Corvair WW told me to figure 240 lbs. for my
      > engine ready to run including exhaust, starter, magneto, oil, and wood prop.
      >
      > And concerning the crankshaft breakage problems interestingly enough in the
      > same magazine is an Ercoupe article with a picture of an Ercoupe in a bean
      > field the victim of a C-85 with a broken crank (page 57). Reading articles
      > like this in addition to articles concerning the Lycoming crankshaft class
      > action lawsuits:
      >
      >
      > http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/leadnews/lycoming_crankshaft_lawsuit_193160-1.html
      >
      > http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/briefs/Lycoming_Crankshaft_Lawsuit_193841-1.html
      >
      > (give me a break, 5000 defective crankshafts in new engines people are
      > paying $25,000 to $40,000 for?), I am no more concerned about breaking a
      > nitrided Corvair crank with a 5th bearing than I am breaking the crank on an
      > O200 that I bought used and hope never had a prop strike.
      >
      > Rick
      >
      > --
      > Rick Holland
      > Castle Rock, Colorado
      >
      > *
      >
      > *
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: great info Bill Church--- 0-200 powered Piets | 
      
      
      Well 58TL took 7 years to build and received its airworthiness certificate in 2002.
      My Papa, Bill Emo, and Tim Mickle built two nearly identical planes. However,
      it was not my Papa's original to build a pietenpol. He had fallen in love
      with the British SE-5A and had always wanted to build one. There were two problems
      with the design that deterred him. One would be the difficulty of build.
      We spent alot of time talking about them and the other reason was because it
      had only one seat. He was all about sharing aviation so he knew this would just
      simply not work. It wasnt until Tim asked my Papa to help him with some wing
      ribs on a new project of his. The rest is history. So it took them 7 years but
      they are by far the nicest pietenpols I have seen. And some of the most practical
      I might add. 58TL and 57TL are both equipped with O-200's with a full electric
      system. Landing lights, radios, cockpit lights,etc.. The power of supplied
      by the O-200 is great. Cruise is around 90-95 mph. Climb is probably 700-800
      fpm with passenger and nearing 1000fpm solo. However these are merely guesstimates
      as there is no VSI.
      It has a cub cowling and the bungee style gear with 8.00x6.00 tires and toe breaks
      in both pits. Front panel is sparse. Only slip/skip and gps. It flies like
      a dream and is ery light on the controls. You think it and its there. A very
      docile machine I'd say.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247164#247164
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: group osh arrival plans? | 
      
      Re: Pietenpol-List: group osh arrival plans?Yes, the turf runway is 
      usable.
      
      Greg
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Jeff Boatright 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 9:22 PM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: group osh arrival plans?
      
      
        Is the turf runway useable?
      
      
          The staging airport is Waupun. More details will be in the July 
      newsletter.
      
          I will post more info here over the next few days.
      
          Greg C.
      
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Bill Emo photo attached | 
      
      
      John thanks so much for the picture. I have never seen this one before and its
      really great. Could you send this to my email address it would be greatly appreciated.
      jordan.carr.17@gmail.com
      
      Thank you for the kind words everyone. 
      
      
      -Jordan
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247167#247167
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |