Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Tue 08/25/09


Total Messages Posted: 70



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:12 AM - Re: Re: spiral grain definition (Clif Dawson)
     2. 03:17 AM - Re: deadstick flying (Jack Phillips)
     3. 04:22 AM - Re: deadstick flying (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation])
     4. 05:13 AM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? (airlion)
     5. 05:54 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material;exelente (Gary Boothe)
     6. 05:54 AM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? (Gary Boothe)
     7. 06:17 AM - Re: Markle's visiting Helsper ? (Gary Boothe)
     8. 06:34 AM - Re: Progress Report (K5YAC)
     9. 06:44 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material;exelente (brian.e.jardine@l-3com.com)
    10. 06:46 AM - Re: Re: Progress Report (Gary Boothe)
    11. 06:47 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Michael Perez)
    12. 06:47 AM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? (Michael Perez)
    13. 06:56 AM - Re: Progress Report (K5YAC)
    14. 07:16 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Jack Phillips)
    15. 07:16 AM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? (Gene Rambo)
    16. 07:47 AM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? (Ed G.)
    17. 07:48 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Michael Perez)
    18. 07:49 AM - Riblett 612 (Ken Howe)
    19. 07:54 AM - brodhead 2010' (Douwe Blumberg)
    20. 08:24 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Jack Phillips)
    21. 08:57 AM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit (Jerry Dotson)
    22. 09:04 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Michael Perez)
    23. 09:05 AM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation])
    24. 09:21 AM - Re: Riblett 612 (jb.spiegel@us.schneider-electric.com)
    25. 09:24 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Ryan Mueller)
    26. 09:34 AM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wi (K5YAC)
    27. 10:19 AM - Anyone have a prop....... (TOPGUN)
    28. 10:30 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Jack Phillips)
    29. 11:01 AM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Michael Perez)
    30. 11:11 AM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? (Jeff Boatright)
    31. 12:44 PM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Mark Roberts)
    32. 01:24 PM - Re: Fuselage building and material (K5YAC)
    33. 02:48 PM - Re: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit (Bill Church)
    34. 03:12 PM - Re: Fuselage building and material (Michael Perez)
    35. 03:17 PM - Re: Re: Fuselage building and material (Michael Perez)
    36. 03:23 PM - Re: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit (Michael Perez)
    37. 04:12 PM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit (K5YAC)
    38. 04:15 PM - Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair (Rick Holland)
    39. 04:23 PM - Engine question (brian.e.jardine@l-3com.com)
    40. 04:43 PM - Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair (Jack Phillips)
    41. 04:43 PM - Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit (Jerry Dotson)
    42. 04:45 PM - Re: Engine question (Jack Phillips)
    43. 04:53 PM - Re: Engine question (amsafetyc@aol.com)
    44. 04:53 PM - Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair (amsafetyc@aol.com)
    45. 04:57 PM - Re: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit (Bill Church)
    46. 05:14 PM - Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair (Jack Phillips)
    47. 05:14 PM - Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair (John Hofmann)
    48. 05:23 PM - Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair (Lagowski Morrow)
    49. 05:31 PM - Re: Re: Progress Report (Lagowski Morrow)
    50. 05:50 PM - Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair (amsafetyc@aol.com)
    51. 05:55 PM - Re: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit (TOM MICHELLE BRANT)
    52. 05:59 PM - Bingelis books (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation])
    53. 06:01 PM - One builder's rule of thumb-- how long will it take ? (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation])
    54. 06:37 PM - Re: Progress Report (K5YAC)
    55. 06:42 PM - Re: One builder's rule of thumb-- how long will it take ? (Jerry Dotson)
    56. 06:56 PM - Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair (Kip and Beth Gardner)
    57. 07:00 PM - Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair (Kip and Beth Gardner)
    58. 07:10 PM - Markle-Helsper visit (helspersew@aol.com)
    59. 07:36 PM - Re: Markle-Helsper visit (K5YAC)
    60. 07:41 PM - Re: Progress Report (TulsaFlyer)
    61. 07:53 PM - Re: Markle-Helsper visit (amsafetyc@aol.com)
    62. 07:54 PM - Re: Re: Markle-Helsper visit (amsafetyc@aol.com)
    63. 07:58 PM - Re: Progress Report (K5YAC)
    64. 08:07 PM - Re: Markle-Helsper visit (K5YAC)
    65. 08:52 PM - Re: Re: Markle-Helsper visit (Clif Dawson)
    66. 10:13 PM - Re: Fuselage building and material;exelente (jorge lizarraga)
    67. 10:16 PM - Re: Fuselage building and material (jorge lizarraga)
    68. 10:21 PM - Re: Fuselage building and material;exelente (jorge lizarraga)
    69. 10:26 PM - Re: Fuselage building and material;exelente ok. (jorge lizarraga)
    70. 10:40 PM - Re: deadstick flying (Baldeagle)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:12:21 AM PST US
    From: "Clif Dawson" <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: spiral grain definition
    Take a towel. One end in each hand. Stretch it out. Twist it up a few turns. This is what a spiral grown tree looks like. Picture a board cut from that tree. I've seen trees with one complete spiral in a hundred feet and others with a complete 360=B0 twist in 8 ft. There's an old four foot diameter log on Wreck Beach just like that right now. And then there's trees that grow out the side of a hill. When you cut a board from such a tree in half it'll do one of two things. Those halves will either spread apart or the kerf will close up. Another thing to watch for is a very fine jog in the grain, kind of like daisy the dog in Dagwood. That comes from a tree falling on another log. If it hits just right it won't break in half but will slightly shift the grain. This is a definite cause for rejection. Your not going to see this often but it does happen as one hapless ladder company found out. Oh, the vagaries of wood. Just like people. Clif Remember, no effort that we make to attain something beautiful is ever lost." ~ Helen Keller There is an Austrian site that explains spiral grain pretyy simple explanation, also shows the correct way to lay quarter sawn wood in relationship to load bearing. On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Bill Church Okay Tom, now I understand what you're getting at. The Ol' picture's worth a thousand words, once again.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:17:04 AM PST US
    From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: deadstick flying
    If you want to try this, let me give you a little tip (learned when I did the same thing with my J-3 in Texas years ago): Do it over an airport with a long runway and aim for the MIDDLE of the runway for your landing. That way, if the glide is a little different from what you expect, you can easily compensate. Jack Phillips NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gary Boothe Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:33 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: deadstick flying I pulled the same 'stunt' in my T-craft. The surprise to me was not how slow I had to get it to stop windmilling, but how fast I had to dive (and how much altitude it took) to overcome compression and start again! Having done it couple times, and looking back (waaaay back - like 35 years! And it seemed like a good idea at the time, even though I was nowhere near the airport), I'm not sure what useful information I learned. Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done, Fuselage on gear (13 ribs down.) -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation] Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:51 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: deadstick flying Aerospace Corporation]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> Good Shad-- I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only one who has intentionally shut down an engine in flight. After having our Champ for about 3 years I shutdown the engine about 2,000' msl over my home field on a weekday when the only one in the air was me. I did a circling approach and came in high on purpose then slipped off the altitude to touchdown. I was doing my best Bob Hoover wanna be in a Champ:) I was surprised at how many times it took me to stop the windmilling prop. (I didn't have a Corvair:))) Kidding ! I stalled the airplane three times to get the metal prop to stop windmilling. Okay...so that was a fairly tired engine so the compression wasn't the best to stop the prop quickly. It got quiet quick but it was really a good learning experience in that I really needed to keep the nose much more down to keep my glide speed up than you would with an engine at idle-- surprise number one. Surprise number two is how short your landing roll is---again, with no windmilling prop there is no thrust what so ever to keep you rolling a bit longer on landing. It was dead quiet when the wheels stopped rumbling on the grass. Was a good experience. In my mind they should make every Private and Sport Pilot do spins-- to the left and right and do at least one intentional dead stick landing at an airport with a good long runway. Not kidding-- just like I think every High School Student should either have to spend a month in a foreign third world country or go thru boot camp to qualify for graduation. Not kidding there either. Okay-- enough of my rambling. Mike C. in Ohio


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:22:43 AM PST US
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Subject: deadstick flying
    I agree with Jack's mention of "aim for the middle of the runway, not the end" when you have a deadstick on your hands. That would translate to aiming for the middle of a farmers field, grassy stretch, or whatever you are trying to land on. I learned that (especially so in a Pietenpol with all that drag) your 'circle', if you will, of potential fields to land in is MUCH smaller in diameter with a dead engine than with an idling engine. Pick something close-- something that is doable with altitude to spare, not where you put yourself in a situation where you're trying to stretch your glide. Mike C.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:13:11 AM PST US
    From: airlion <airlion@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there with your Pietenpol ? Bill, If you get down this way, you might want go to Carrollton Ga. to see the Big Piet Squadron. They are Show Quality Planes---Steel tube fuse and Corvairs. Cheers, Gardiner ________________________________ From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:56:00 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? Well, since my name was specifically mentioned, I better respond. Next year ain't gonna happen fo me. 5 years from now... well that IS a possibility (barring "life" getting in the way) - especially since I've recently located my engine (just need to get down to Georgia to pick it up). I've been at this project for 4 1/2 years now, and back when I began it I said that it should take 5 to 10 years to complete, so that would still be on track. I think having a powerplant sitting in the garage should be a morale booster and inspiration to "get 'er done". Bill Church (infidel from Canada)


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:54:09 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5@comcast.net>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material;exelente
    Jorge, All the 1/8" plywood on my project is Marine Mahogany which I purchased locally. In fact, I just found a new supplier in the San Francisco Bay Area that is far cheaper. The last sheet I bought from MacBeath Hardwood was $25!! If you just need some scraps for making gussets for your tail, let me know. Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done, Fuselage on gear (13 ribs down.) _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jorge lizarraga Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 9:37 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente hi im jorge from hanford ca, in these moment i folow thw nex step tp build my piet is the tail section stare whit the stavilizer and look you mail is bery nice to have okume plywood sprus sale for the same size 98 a pise 4X8FT IF YOU NOW SOME GUYS BUILD THE SIDE COVER WHIT THESE WOOD YOUNOW . tanks for you mail and seyou nex --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two locations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders have opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avoid water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will prevent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked with water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuselage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a mahogany-like tropical wood). While it is not quite as strong as Aircraft ply made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and is manufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the lower cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, and available in 4' x 8' sheets. A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: http://www.noahsmarine.com/ http://www.boulterplywood.com/ Bill C. " rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List et=_blank>http://forums.matronics.com llow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution _________________


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:54:55 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5@comcast.net>
    Subject: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there with your Pietenpol ? B=85or 2011 Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done, Fuselage on gear (13 ribs down=85) _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation] Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:39 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? Normally my posts are =BD in fun, =BD serious but I really would like to know by way of an informal straw poll two things. A. Who of you is on serious track to have your new flying Pietenpols at Brodhead in 2010 and B. Who of you believe you will have your new Pietenpols flying in 5 years for the 85th Piet Anniversary. I=92m excited about the new crop of Pietenpols in the making in various places thru the country, Canada (Bill Church) and elsewhere coming along. Mike C.


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:17:23 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5@comcast.net>
    Subject: Markle's visiting Helsper ?
    Jim, You didn't manage to snag a spare set of those seat belt and shoulder harnesses from that DC3, did you? Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done, Fuselage on gear (13 ribs down.) -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation] Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:54 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Markle's visiting Helsper ? First off, lock up all your valuables. Secondly if your wife is really pretty-- get her out of the county while Jim visits. Don't leave your wallet lying around and lock up any valuable hand tools, straight-grained sitka spruce and a/c quality plywood or AN hardware. Good Lord, we'd better pray for you Dan. You've NEVER met THE Jim Markle ?


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:34:31 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Progress Report
    From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net>
    Having never done this before (full scale) I just took a page out of Tony Bengelis' construction manuals (and some R/C experience) and built a vertical jig. I never really considered building them on a table top. I did build a few R/C wings back in the 80s on a table top, but I've used an elevated wing jig on those too since the early 90s. To answer you question Gary... yes, I slid my ribs into place while the spars were supported by the jig. I hope this method works out ok. The only thing I am concerned about is that the jig supports are 8' apart (the width of my workbench), so I may encounter some sagging in the middle (?) not sure. I'll take some measurements tonight to see if an extra support might be required. Anyone have any suggestions concerning this method? -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259457#259457


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:44:45 AM PST US
    From: brian.e.jardine@l-3com.com
    Subject: Fuselage building and material;exelente
    I have to agree with Gary....we have a MacBeath Hardwood here in SLC, UT and the prices are great I got my Spruce and ply and I don't have to pay shipping costs. Brian SLC, UT From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gary Boothe Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:39 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente Jorge, All the 1/8" plywood on my project is Marine Mahogany which I purchased locally. In fact, I just found a new supplier in the San Francisco Bay Area that is far cheaper. The last sheet I bought from MacBeath Hardwood was $25!! If you just need some scraps for making gussets for your tail, let me know. Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done, Fuselage on gear (13 ribs down...) ________________________________ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jorge lizarraga Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 9:37 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente hi im jorge from hanford ca, in these moment i folow thw nex step tp build my piet is the tail section stare whit the stavilizer and look you mail is bery nice to have okume plywood sprus sale for the same size 98 a pise 4X8FT IF YOU NOW SOME GUYS BUILD THE SIDE COVER WHIT THESE WOOD YOUNOW . tanks for you mail and seyou nex --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two locations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders have opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avoid water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will prevent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked with water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuselage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a mahogany-like tropical wood). While it is not quite as strong as Aircraft ply made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and is manufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the lower cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, and available in 4' x 8' sheets. A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: http://www.noahsmarine.com/ http://www.boulterplywood.com/ Bill C. " rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List et=_blank>http://forums.matronics.com llow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution _________________ http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:46:56 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Progress Report
    Thanks! I would think that stretching a string from butt to tip and the trammeling process would take care of any sag...all done before leading and trailing edge. Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done, Fuselage on gear (13 ribs down.) -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of K5YAC Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:34 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Progress Report Having never done this before (full scale) I just took a page out of Tony Bengelis' construction manuals (and some R/C experience) and built a vertical jig. I never really considered building them on a table top. I did build a few R/C wings back in the 80s on a table top, but I've used an elevated wing jig on those too since the early 90s. To answer you question Gary... yes, I slid my ribs into place while the spars were supported by the jig. I hope this method works out ok. The only thing I am concerned about is that the jig supports are 8' apart (the width of my workbench), so I may encounter some sagging in the middle (?) not sure. I'll take some measurements tonight to see if an extra support might be required. Anyone have any suggestions concerning this method? -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259457#259457


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:47:06 AM PST US
    From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material
    Thank you Bill. Any idea if it is safe to do the side and bottom sheets in pieces as opposed to 6 foot long lengths?- Aircraft Spruce is going to st ick me with a trucking fee, (about $95.00 I believe) to ship 5 pounds of pl ywood because of the length! --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two loc ations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders h ave opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avo id water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). - Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will p revent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked w ith water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuse lage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a ma hogany-like tropical wood).-While it is not quite as strong as Aircraft p ly made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and is m anufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the low er cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, and a vailable in 4' x 8' sheets. - A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: - - http://www.noahsmarine.com/ http://www.boulterplywood.com/ - Bill C.


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:47:36 AM PST US
    From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there with your Pietenpol ? Mr. Cuy, I believe NX992WD will be at the 85th!- If we can, we can form u p and go together with whomever else wants to go from our area.


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:56:26 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Progress Report
    From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net>
    Right... I'll be looking at that stuff this evening. Thanks Gary! -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259471#259471


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:16:15 AM PST US
    From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material
    If you use small pieces of plywood, you will need to glue them together with scarf joints to retain the strength required. I did this in my floorboard. As I recall, I used an 8:1 scarf, so for =BC=94 ply, the scarf was 2=94 wide. Jack Phillips NX899JP _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Michael Perez Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:10 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Thank you Bill. Any idea if it is safe to do the side and bottom sheets in pieces as opposed to 6 foot long lengths? Aircraft Spruce is going to stick me with a trucking fee, (about $95.00 I believe) to ship 5 pounds of plywood because of the length! --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two locations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders have opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avoid water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will prevent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked with water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuselage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a mahogany-like tropical wood). While it is not quite as strong as Aircraft ply made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and is manufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the lower cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, and available in 4' x 8' sheets. A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: http://www.noahsmarine.com/ http://www.boulterplywood.com/ Bill C. " target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List =nofollow>http://forums.matronics.com blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:16:52 AM PST US
    From: "Gene Rambo" <generambo@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there with your Pietenpol ? Mikeeeeee: I THINK I am on track to make it next year. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation]<mailto:michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov> To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com<mailto:pietenpol-list@matronics.com> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 2:39 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? Normally my posts are =BD in fun, =BD serious but I really would like to know by way of an informal straw poll two things. 1.. Who of you is on serious track to have your new flying Pietenpols at Brodhead in 2010 and 2.. Who of you believe you will have your new Pietenpols flying in 5 years for the 85th Piet Anniversary. I'm excited about the new crop of Pietenpols in the making in various places thru the country, Canada (Bill Church) and elsewhere coming along. Mike C. http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List<http://www.matronics.co m/Navigator?Pietenpol-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/contributi on>


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:47:30 AM PST US
    From: "Ed G." <flyboy_120@hotmail.com>
    Subject: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there with your Pietenpol ? 2010 will be close but I think I'm looking at 2011. Ed Grentzer Left coas t Florida From: generambo@msn.com Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YO U be there with your Pietenpol ? Mikeeeeee: I THINK I am on track to make it next year. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: Cuy=2C Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation] Sent: Monday=2C August 24=2C 2009 2:39 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there with your Pietenpol ? Normally my posts are =BD in fun=2C =BD serious but I really would like to know by way of an informal straw poll two things. Who of you is on serious track to have your new flying Pietenpols at Brod head in 2010 and Who of you believe you will have your new Pietenpols flying in 5 years for the 85th Piet Anniversary. I'm excited about the new crop of Pietenpols in the making in various place s thru the country=2C Canada (Bill Church) and elsewhere coming along. Mike C. title=http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://ww w.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigato r?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you=92re up to on Facebook. http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL :ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:48:06 AM PST US
    From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material
    Thanks Jack. I gather from your post that a simple butt joint along the cen ter of one of the side supports is not a good idea? --- On Tue, 8/25/09, Jack Phillips <pietflyr@bellsouth.net> wrote: From: Jack Phillips <pietflyr@bellsouth.net> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material If you use small pieces of plywood, you will need to glue them together wit h scarf joints to retain the strength required.=C2- I did this in my floo rboard. As I recall, I used an 8:1 scarf, so for =C2=BC=9D ply, the s carf was 2=9D wide. =C2- Jack Phillips NX899JP =C2- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto: owner-pietenpol-li st-server@matronics.com ] On Behalf Of Michael Perez Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:10 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material =C2- Thank you Bill. Any idea if it is safe to do the side and bottom sheets in pieces as opposed to 6 foot long lengths?=C2- Aircraft Spruce is going to stick me with a trucking fee, (about $95.00 I believe) to ship 5 pounds of plywood because of the length! --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two loc ations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders h ave opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avo id water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). =C2- Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will p revent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked w ith water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuse lage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a ma hogany-like tropical wood).=C2-While it is not quite as strong as Aircraf t ply made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and i s manufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the lower cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, an d available in 4' x 8' sheets. =C2- A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: =C2- =C2- http://www.noahsmarine.com/ http://www.boulterplywood.com/ =C2- Bill C. =C2- =C2-" target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics. com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List=nofollow>http://forums.matronics.comblank re l=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2- =C2- =C2-http ://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics.comhtt p://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2-


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:49:08 AM PST US
    From: Ken Howe <ken@cooper-mtn.com>
    Subject: Riblett 612
    I posted a few pictures a month or so ago of the 612 ribs I'm building. Here are a few more showing some details of my jig. I made cams from an old closet pole to hold the strips in the jig. Makes it very easy to remove the half-glued rib. For the second side, my jig consists of a flat board with locating blocks at just 3 locations. All I wanted to do was hold in place on a flat board while the T-88 sets. I now have 7 ribs completed, with one in the jig ready to glue up. Quality of the first 3 pictures isn't real great - I snapped them with my phone. They show my setup for bending the top and bottom capstrips. Mark Roberts had asked me off-line about bending the strips, so this is how I do it. My 'steamer' is 4' of 2" ABS pipe. I bungee it standing up against whatever is handy and fill it full of boiling water with 3 strips at a time. I replace the water 3 or 4 times over about 4 hours to keep it hot. the rags piled on top keeep the strips submerged and help keep the heat in. My bending form is a 2x6. The curve came from the top surface curve of the rib layout. I then scrunched it up horizontally with my CAD program so that it's a tighter curve to allow for springback. After 2 ribs I decided that the this still didn't give the leading edge enough curvature after bending. I really had to force the strip into the jig and it was difficult to get it aligned right with the 1/2' sq leading edge block. So I free-formed a tighter curve in the leading 6-7". The strips do now fit the jig better. The Riblett section is more blunt than the Piet section, so there is more curvature in both the top and bottom surfaces. Consequently, I decided to pre-bend the bottom strip as well as the top. I do both bends in the one bending form. The 2nd picture shows all 3 strip in the form, with the 2 leading clamps attached. For a top strip I then bend it further with a 3rd clamp. For bottom strips I just use 2 clamps. The 3rd picture shows 2 bottom strips and 1 top strip drying in the jig. Picture 4 is the completed jig. 5 and 6 sshow how I've fitted a block under the front spar so I can use the standard 4 3/4" spar with the thicker section. I'll add small wedges on top of both spars when I assemble the wing. Pictures 5 and 6 show on of the cams as I initially fit the stop strip, and then tightened to force it into the correct shape. The lat couple pictures are details of the leading and trailing edges. The 2 trailing cams allow me to 'dial-in' the exact location of the strips. --Ken


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:54:59 AM PST US
    From: Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
    Subject: brodhead 2010'
    I am on track to be flying later this fall or early winter, and am really hoping that it is "debugged" enough for me to fly up next year. As Dan mentioned, we'd like to try to make our grand entrance with two new Fords together, Lord willing. Douwe


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:24:21 AM PST US
    From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material
    Nope. Very little strength in a butt joint. When you make the scarf, make the piece wider than you need so you have a test sample to break. The plywood should tear before the glue joint breaks. With a butt joint, the glue will break every time. Jack _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Michael Perez Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Thanks Jack. I gather from your post that a simple butt joint along the center of one of the side supports is not a good idea? --- On Tue, 8/25/09, Jack Phillips <pietflyr@bellsouth.net> wrote: From: Jack Phillips <pietflyr@bellsouth.net> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material If you use small pieces of plywood, you will need to glue them together with scarf joints to retain the strength required. I did this in my floorboard. As I recall, I used an 8:1 scarf, so for =BC=94 ply, the scarf was 2=94 wide. Jack Phillips NX899JP _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com ] On Behalf Of Michael Perez Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:10 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Thank you Bill. Any idea if it is safe to do the side and bottom sheets in pieces as opposed to 6 foot long lengths? Aircraft Spruce is going to stick me with a trucking fee, (about $95.00 I believe) to ship 5 pounds of plywood because of the length! --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two locations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders have opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avoid water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will prevent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked with water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuselage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a mahogany-like tropical wood). While it is not quite as strong as Aircraft ply made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and is manufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the lower cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, and available in 4' x 8' sheets. A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: <http://www.noahsmarine.com/> http://www.noahsmarine.com/ <http://www.boulterplywood.com/> http://www.boulterplywood.com/ Bill C. " target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List =nofollow>http://forums.matronics.com blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution " target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List =nofollow>http://forums.matronics.com blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:57:12 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there wit
    From: "Jerry Dotson" <jdotson@erec.net>
    Yes I hope to be there. I hope to fly sometime late 2010 as I am retired and can build every(almost) day. I am not setting a time as I don't want to take any shortcuts that affect quality or appearance. Still waiting on AS for wood package. -------- Jerry Dotson 59 Daniel Johnson Rd Baker, FL 32531 Started building NX510JD July, 2009 using Lycoming O-235 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259494#259494


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:04:35 AM PST US
    From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material
    Thanks again Jack. I am not trying to argue with you at all, I'm just tryin g to get my head around what you are telling me. - The scarf joint will be along one of the vertical side supports, or will th e scarf joint be "non-supported" so to speak between supports...in a way. - You feel that a butt joint centered along one of the side supports is not g ood enough. I understand that if the butt joint was "non-supported" that su re, it is weak, but butted along the center line of an existing vertical si de support is not good either...yes?


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:05:51 AM PST US
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Subject: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there with your Pietenpol ? Beautiful ! We've got a BUNCH OF NEW Pietenpols to look forward to next year. That's it-I'm packing my Stratolounger lawn chair in the car and my cooler and I'm going to sit out there with Jeff Boatright (unless he flies up in 2010 with his Piet) and take videos of you guys all doing landings and takeoffs without a video camera. You can do it Gene.....prioritize man:) PS-we'll be grading landings like they do during Olympic events. [cid:image001.jpg@01CA257A.675B3970]


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:21:29 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Riblett 612
    From: jb.spiegel@us.schneider-electric.com
    Ken, great pictures, one comment though, instead of wrapping the top of your bending soaker pipe with towels and risking damaging the towels use the cat that is sitting on the chair, the tail makes a great handle for pulling it out of the tube, and you can stuff it in with the next cap strip. ;-) Jake do not archive


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:24:01 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuselage building and material
    From: Ryan Mueller <rmueller23@gmail.com>
    If the plans call for a single sheet of ply, and you wish to replicate the strength of a single sheet of ply, then you need to join the multiple pieces with scarf joints. Jack seemed pretty clear, but for another opinion, here's what Tony Bingelis has to say along those lines: "First, let me emphatically state that butt joints have no place in wing construction unless called for by the designer - a most unlikely thing. An aircraft engineer designer may, on rare occasion, show a butt joint in a fuselage design, for example, but he would incorporate a plywood splice plate to reinforce it. A simple butt joint made directly over a solid wood upright or frame would never do because a solid wood piece could easily split and fail the joint. On the other hand, a good scarf joint will transmit just about 100% of the load from one panel to the other. Your plywood scarf splices should have a minimum slope of 10:1, preferably, 12:1 for wing skins on spars. A few builders may go overboard and try to make scarf splices using 16:1 and shallower scarf slopes. This is unnecessary and results in a very flimsy feathered edge that is easily damaged." Ryan On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>wrote: > Thanks again Jack. I am not trying to argue with you at all, I'm just > trying to get my head around what you are telling me. > > The scarf joint will be along one of the vertical side supports, or will > the scarf joint be "non-supported" so to speak between supports...in a way. > > You feel that a butt joint centered along one of the side supports is not > good enough. I understand that if the butt joint was "non-supported" that > sure, it is weak, but butted along the center line of an existing vertical > side support is not good either...yes? > > ** > >


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:34:17 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there wi
    From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net>
    Count me in on the peanut gallery. I'll be flying my blue ice chest from my lawn chair. -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259503#259503


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:19:58 AM PST US
    Subject: Anyone have a prop.......
    From: "TOPGUN" <rmdinfo@lakefield.net>
    I am looking to buy a good wooden 76 x 42 prop. Preferably new, but will consider a good used one. Thanks, Chris crusch@lakefield.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259517#259517


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:30:13 AM PST US
    From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material
    A butt joint won't be as good as a scarf joint, because you will need to join the pieces of plywood together before gluing them down to the fuselage structure, and they have a curve in them. A scarf joint, properly done, is as strong as an uninterrupted sheet of plywood _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Michael Perez Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:56 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Thanks again Jack. I am not trying to argue with you at all, I'm just trying to get my head around what you are telling me. The scarf joint will be along one of the vertical side supports, or will the scarf joint be "non-supported" so to speak between supports...in a way. You feel that a butt joint centered along one of the side supports is not good enough. I understand that if the butt joint was "non-supported" that sure, it is weak, but butted along the center line of an existing vertical side support is not good either...yes?


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:01:23 AM PST US
    From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material
    Thank you Jack and Ryan. Seems like we are all on the same page, now, final ly. Since I do not want to take the time to learn, build, practice and make a scarf joint in my plywood skins, I will stick to the full sheet...althou gh it won't be coming from A. Spruce. - I find it strange that a butt joint over an existing upright is not good pr actice, but I trust that there are reasons for not doing it and that works for me.- This list is great for such advice and guidance!-


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:11:50 AM PST US
    From: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>
    Subject: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU
    be there with your Pietenpol ? Hey, now, surely I'll have the induction leak found and fixed by 2010! You guys should really be pulling for me to make the flight up in our Piet. My landings will make everyone's look GREAT! >That's it-I'm packing my Stratolounger lawn chair in the car and my >cooler and I'm going to sit out there with Jeff Boatright (unless >he flies up in 2010 with his Piet) and take videos of you guys all >doing landings and takeoffs without a video camera.


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:44:36 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuselage building and material
    From: Mark Roberts <mark.rbrts1@gmail.com>
    I can appreciate your thinking on the butt joint not being sufficient when placed over an existing upright, as in other types of construction like a house it would make sense. However, remember that the purpose of the plywood sides and bottom as designed on the plane are not there to simply add a 'hard siding' to the fuselage, but to add the reinforcing necessary to sustain the various loads on the plane in normal and extreme operation. So, as we know from life in general, the weakest link in a chain (or structure) will fail, and usually when you need it to NOT fail the most (perhaps a hard landing, etc). Without a scarf joint (a tapered overlaping of the plywood edges) the plywood is simply joined via a butt joint over a fuse upright. Essentially the only strength there is the limited amount offered by the long edge, and when you consider that it is only an 1/8inch thick, that's not much. A lapped/scarfed joint shares that load over about a 1"-2" width along the edge, much like the difference in taping 2 pieces of paper together: overlapping them a bit is stronger than taping them edge to edge. Instead of 1/8" butted together on the joint between the 2 edges, you have an overlap if about an inch or so giving a really good joint to 2 thin pieces of plywood, and offering the joint much more strength. Do you have a copy of Tony Bingelis<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?%5Fencoding=UTF8&sort=relevancerank&search-type=ss&index=books&field-author=Tony%20Bingelis>books? I have 'the Sport Plane Builder' ( http://www.amazon.com/Sportplane-Builder-Aircraft-Construction-Bingelis/dp/094000030X) and need to get the other 3 before too long. This is a great reference for additional info on this question as well as many others!! Mark On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>wrote: > > Thank you Jack and Ryan. Seems like we are all on the same page, now, > finally. Since I do not want to take the time to learn, build, practice and > make a scarf joint in my plywood skins, I will stick to the full > sheet...although it won't be coming from A. Spruce. > > I find it strange that a butt joint over an existing upright is not good > practice, but I trust that there are reasons for not doing it and that works > for me. This list is great for such advice and guidance! > > * > > * > >


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:24:35 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuselage building and material
    From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net>
    I second the need for Tony Bengelis' books, although I found "The Sportplane Builder" and "Sportplane Construction Techniques" to be very similar. If you can only afford one of the two right now, I would recommend "The Sportpane Builder." The other two that round out the set of four that everyone references, "Firewall Forward" and "Converting Auto Engines" are equally good in the information they provide. I honestly haven't dug into either very deeply yet, but I have thumbed through both a time or two and I can tell that they will be very helpful when the time comes. My 2% of a dollar. -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259541#259541


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:48:09 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU
    be there wit
    From: "Bill Church" <eng@canadianrogers.com>
    Jerry, You say you started building last month, and hope to fly sometime late 2010? Very ambitious. When you say you are not setting a time, do you mean "time of day"? Late 2010 sounds like setting a time to me. Being able to build every day will definitely speed up the process, but don't get discouraged if you find that things seem to be taking longer than you expected. Enjoy the ride. Having said that, some people are very quick to get things done. Maybe you're one of those guys. Have fun. Bill C. -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Dotson Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:57 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit Yes I hope to be there. I hope to fly sometime late 2010 as I am retired and can build every(almost) day. I am not setting a time as I don't want to take any shortcuts that affect quality or appearance. Still waiting on AS for wood package. -------- Jerry Dotson 59 Daniel Johnson Rd Baker, FL 32531 Started building NX510JD July, 2009 using Lycoming O-235


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:12:57 PM PST US
    From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Fuselage building and material
    Thanks Mark for the more detailed explanation on the butt/scarf joints.- -You and Ryan made reference to the- Tony Bingelis books...here is how big of a loser I am...sure I have them, I have all of his set...did I look in there for my answer? NOPE! I always forget that I have them! I need to s et them out in my shop area in the open so I see them all the time. Would h ave saved us all some headache.


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:17:08 PM PST US
    From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Fuselage building and material
    K5, as you may have seen my other post...I have the- Tony Bingelis books, I have them tucked away and always forget I have them. (loser)- They are no going to be placed out in the shop in the wide open so I won't forget a gain!


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:23:42 PM PST US
    From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU
    be there wit Jerry, one thing that I found almost a year into my building was fatigue/bu rnout. I felt like I was losing interest and started to get bummed because I wasn't out in the shop day in and day out like I was at first. The guilt started to set in because I believed I NEEDED to be out there all the time like it was week one every week. - I took two weeks off to build some furniture for the house. What a help tha t was! I came back to the plane refreshed, eager and ready to bring it! - My point: IF you find yourself slowing down, getting bored, losing motivati on someday, just take a break...in the long run, it will be a benefit.- - If you never feel that way, then I guess you will be at Air Venture in 2010 !


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:12:47 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there wit
    From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net>
    eng(at)canadianrogers.com wrote: > > When you say you are not setting a time, do you mean "time of day"? > -- I was thinking the same thing... but that is funny. [Shocked] -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259575#259575


    Message 38


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:15:45 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair
    From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com>
    "Unsafe at any speed" - that's what I was thinking of painting on the side of my Piet. Probably wouldn't get many passengers volunteering to take rides though. rick On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hey Fellow Piet'ers, I had fun flying the past few days, racking up almost > 4 hrs of just enjoying the nice weather untill, I finnally found out how > quiet a piet is when the engine stops in flight................wait for > it.......wait for it (waiting for the corvair haters to sling some mud). > But, I shut it off just to see what it was like. I climbed up to 4000ft, > about 3000agl, and shut her down, and was just enjoying the silence, and > comparing the sink rate and feeling with the prop stopped. It seemed to > glide a little better shut down than with the engine at idle, but maybe it > just seemed longer. Anyway after loosing 1000ft I hit the starter button > and she lurched forward like a rocket at only 1/4 throttle. I figured I > would rather experiance the dead stick the 1st time when I expected it, and > not be supprized. I have had a blast trying to burn the remaining 130 gal > of 100LL I bought for the year, I only have 2-3 months and then it's just > too cold. > > Enjoy those aircraft engines, they are good too, They better be, my project > is a small bipe with only 16ft span and it has a lyc, our cassutt will need > a 0-200, and both glide like a streamlined crowbar. > > Shad > Corvair: "Unsafe at any speed" he he he > > * > > * > > -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"


    Message 39


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:23:39 PM PST US
    From: brian.e.jardine@l-3com.com
    Subject: Engine question
    Group, I have been debating on the type of engine for my Piet. I need something with horses since my field elevation here in UT is 4700ft. My neighbor has been over to visit and see my project as well as my T-craft project. He told me he has an old 0-235 on an airboat that he would sell me for $1200. It runs but leaks oil like crazy and needs new mags and who knows what else. It has a carb, not sure which type and the junker boat. I could turn and sell the boat for $600 and have a certified engine for $600. My fear is buying an old engine with no logs and an unknown history and having to pay big money to have it gone through to be able to put it on my Piet. Any suggestions from experienced fliers would be appreciated. Brian SLC, UT Brian Jardine L-3 Communications Operations Project Engineer 640 North 2200 West P.O.Box 16850 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 L <<Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>> 801-594-3482 brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com


    Message 40


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:43:13 PM PST US
    From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Flying behind a silent Corvair
    No worse than "Icarus Plummet", although a lot of people don't understand the reference. Jack Phillips NX899JP _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Holland Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:46 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair "Unsafe at any speed" - that's what I was thinking of painting on the side of my Piet. Probably wouldn't get many passengers volunteering to take rides though. rick On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> wrote: Hey Fellow Piet'ers, I had fun flying the past few days, racking up almost 4 hrs of just enjoying the nice weather untill, I finnally found out how quiet a piet is when the engine stops in flight................wait for it.......wait for it (waiting for the corvair haters to sling some mud). But, I shut it off just to see what it was like. I climbed up to 4000ft, about 3000agl, and shut her down, and was just enjoying the silence, and comparing the sink rate and feeling with the prop stopped. It seemed to glide a little better shut down than with the engine at idle, but maybe it just seemed longer. Anyway after loosing 1000ft I hit the starter button and she lurched forward like a rocket at only 1/4 throttle. I figured I would rather experiance the dead stick the 1st time when I expected it, and not be supprized. I have had a blast trying to burn the remaining 130 gal of 100LL I bought for the year, I only have 2-3 months and then it's just too cold. Enjoy those aircraft engines, they are good too, They better be, my project is a small bipe with only 16ft span and it has a lyc, our cassutt will need a 0-200, and both glide like a streamlined crowbar. Shad Corvair: "Unsafe at any speed" he he he " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"


    Message 41


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:43:14 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be
    there wit
    From: "Jerry Dotson" <jdotson@erec.net>
    When I said I wasn't setting a time I meant....wellll if it takes to 2012 to do it right...OK. Late 2010 looks reasonable. That may change stay tuned. In the mid eighties I built my home (10 months) I decided to build my own red oak cabinets. It took me 6 weeks when I thought it might take 2! -------- Jerry Dotson 59 Daniel Johnson Rd Baker, FL 32531 Started building NX510JD July, 2009 Ribs all done using Lycoming O-235 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259582#259582


    Message 42


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:45:44 PM PST US
    From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Engine question
    Good engine choice for that elevation. Buy it and overhaul it yourself. These engines are pretty simple. Buy the Mattituck video on overhauling an O-200 Continental. There's not much different between the small Continentals and the small Lycomings, other than the method of securing the pushrod tubes. Buy the overhaul manual, or I can send you a pdf of the O-235 manual. Buy new bearings, new oil seal, new cylinder O-rings, new gaskets. Figure on sending the cylinders out for work unless you can do it yourself. Upper end you will spend about $800 apiece if the cylinders are junk. Send the crankcase to Divco for overhaul (they will mill down the faces to make it dead flat, then rebore the crankshaft and camshaft bearings). Aircraft Specialties is probably the best at overhauling crankshafts and camshafts. Put new magnetos on it and have the carburetor overhauled. You can end up with a really good engine for less than $10,000. Jack Phillips NX899JP _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of brian.e.jardine@l-3com.com Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:38 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Engine question Group, I have been debating on the type of engine for my Piet. I need something with horses since my field elevation here in UT is 4700ft. My neighbor has been over to visit and see my project as well as my T-craft project. He told me he has an old 0-235 on an airboat that he would sell me for $1200. It runs but leaks oil like crazy and needs new mags and who knows what else. It has a carb, not sure which type and the junker boat. I could turn and sell the boat for $600 and have a certified engine for $600. My fear is buying an old engine with no logs and an unknown history and having to pay big money to have it gone through to be able to put it on my Piet. Any suggestions from experienced fliers would be appreciated. Brian SLC, UT Brian Jardine L-3 Communications Operations Project Engineer 640 North 2200 West P.O.Box 16850 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 L Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 801-594-3482 brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com


    Message 43


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:53:03 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Engine question
    From: amsafetyc@aol.com
    Rm9yIHdoYXQgaXRzIHdvcnRoLCBJIGFtIHVzaW5nIGEgbG93IHRpbWUgMDIzNSB0aGF0IGNhbWUg b3V0IG9mIGEgbm9zZSBvdmVyIHdyZWNrIEkgcGFpZCBzbGlnaHRseSBtb3JlIGJ1dCBoYXZlIGZ1 bGwgbG9ncy4gQSBkbyBpdCBteSBzZWxmZXIgYnkgbmF0dXJlIEkgaGlyZWQgYW4gQSBhbmQgUCB0 byBoZWxwIG1lbnRvciBhbmQgZ3VpZGUgbWUuIA0KDQpUaGUgZW5naW5lIGlzIG5vdyBpbiBwaWVj ZXMgYXQgYSByZXBhaXIgc3RhdGlvbiBmb3IgaW5zcGVjdGlvbiBtYWduYSBmbHV4IG9mIGludGVy bmFscyBhbmQgY2FzZXMgaW5zcGVjdCBoZWFkcyBhbmQganVncyBmaXJzdC4gQ3VycmVudGx5IGF3 YWl0aW5nIGNvc3QgZXN0aW1hdGUgZm9yIG1hY2hpbmluZy4gDQoNCkkgZXhwZWN0IHRvIHN0YXJ0 aW5nIGdldHRpbmcgaW5mbyBpbiBhYm91dCBhIHdlZWsuIA0KDQpJIHRoaW5rIGlmIHlvdSBidWls ZCB3aXRoIGEgc3Ryb25nIGJvdHRvbSBlbmQganVncyBjYW4gYWx3YXlzIGJlIHJlcGxhY2VkLHJl cGFpcmVkIG9yIHNlcnZpY2VkIGF0IGEgbGF0ZXIgZGF0ZSBhbmQgd2l0aG91dCBoYXZpbmcgdG8g cHVsbCB0aGUgZW5naW5lLiANCg0KTXkgcmVzZWFyY2ggb24gTWFncyBpcyBub3QgcHJldHR5LCBh IHBhaXIgb2YgU2xpY2tzIHlvdSBzaG91bGQgcGxhbiBvbiAxNDAwIGZvciBib3RoLiBDYXJiIGRl cGVuZGluZyBhcm91bmQgNiBub3QgaW5jbHVkaW5nIGVsZWN0cmljYWwgDQoNCkkgZ290IGJ1bmNo ZXMgb2YgaW5mbyBvbiB0aGUgZW5naW5lIGNoZWNrIHRoZSBjYXNlcyBmb3IgbnVtYmVycyBvbiB0 aGUgY2FzdGluZ3MgeW91IGNhbiBjYWxsIGx5Y29taW5nIGFuZCB0aGV5IGNhbiB0cmFjZSBpdCBi YWNrIGZvciB5b3UuIA0KDQpKb2huDQpTZW50IGZyb20gbXkgVmVyaXpvbiBXaXJlbGVzcyBCbGFj a0JlcnJ5DQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBicmlhbi5lLmphcmRp bmVAbC0zY29tLmNvbQ0KDQpEYXRlOiBUdWUsIDI1IEF1ZyAyMDA5IDE2OjM4OjAyIA0KVG86IDxw aWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPg0KU3ViamVjdDogUGlldGVucG9sLUxpc3Q6IEVu Z2luZSBxdWVzdGlvbg0KDQoNCkdyb3VwLA0KSSBoYXZlIGJlZW4gZGViYXRpbmcgb24gdGhlIHR5 cGUgb2YgZW5naW5lIGZvciBteSBQaWV0LiAgSSBuZWVkDQpzb21ldGhpbmcgd2l0aCBob3JzZXMg c2luY2UgbXkgZmllbGQgZWxldmF0aW9uIGhlcmUgaW4gVVQgaXMgNDcwMGZ0LiAgTXkNCm5laWdo Ym9yIGhhcyBiZWVuIG92ZXIgdG8gdmlzaXQgYW5kIHNlZSBteSBwcm9qZWN0IGFzIHdlbGwgYXMg bXkgVC1jcmFmdA0KcHJvamVjdC4gSGUgdG9sZCBtZSBoZSBoYXMgYW4gb2xkIDAtMjM1IG9uIGFu IGFpcmJvYXQgdGhhdCBoZSB3b3VsZCBzZWxsDQptZSBmb3IgJDEyMDAuIEl0IHJ1bnMgYnV0IGxl YWtzIG9pbCBsaWtlIGNyYXp5IGFuZCBuZWVkcyBuZXcgbWFncyBhbmQNCndobyBrbm93cyB3aGF0 IGVsc2UuICBJdCBoYXMgYSBjYXJiLCBub3Qgc3VyZSB3aGljaCB0eXBlIGFuZCB0aGUganVua2Vy DQpib2F0LiBJIGNvdWxkIHR1cm4gYW5kIHNlbGwgdGhlIGJvYXQgZm9yICQ2MDAgYW5kIGhhdmUg YSBjZXJ0aWZpZWQNCmVuZ2luZSBmb3IgJDYwMC4gTXkgZmVhciBpcyBidXlpbmcgYW4gb2xkIGVu Z2luZSB3aXRoIG5vIGxvZ3MgYW5kIGFuDQp1bmtub3duIGhpc3RvcnkgYW5kIGhhdmluZyB0byBw YXkgYmlnIG1vbmV5IHRvIGhhdmUgaXQgIGdvbmUgdGhyb3VnaCB0bw0KYmUgYWJsZSB0byBwdXQg aXQgb24gbXkgUGlldC4gIEFueSBzdWdnZXN0aW9ucyBmcm9tIGV4cGVyaWVuY2VkIGZsaWVycw0K d291bGQgYmUgYXBwcmVjaWF0ZWQuDQoNCkJyaWFuDQpTTEMsIFVUDQoNCg0KDQoNCkJyaWFuIEph cmRpbmUNCkwtMyBDb21tdW5pY2F0aW9ucyANCk9wZXJhdGlvbnMgUHJvamVjdCBFbmdpbmVlciAN CjY0MCBOb3J0aCAyMjAwIFdlc3QgDQpQLk8uQm94IDE2ODUwIA0KU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHksIFVU ICA4NDExNiANCg0KTCA8PFBpY3R1cmUgKERldmljZSBJbmRlcGVuZGVudCBCaXRtYXApPj4gICAN Cg0KODAxLTU5NC0zNDgyDQpicmlhbi5lLmphcmRpbmVATC0zY29tLmNvbQ0KDQoNCg0K


    Message 44


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:53:19 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair
    From: amsafetyc@aol.com
    QWN0dWFsbHkgSSBsb3ZlZCB0aGUgaXJvbnkgb2YgdGhlIG5hbWUuICBJIHdpc2ggc29tZXRoaW5n IGFzIG5lYXQgd2lsbCBjb21lIHRvIG1pbmQgZm9yIG1pbmUNCg0KSm9obg0KU2VudCBmcm9tIG15 IFZlcml6b24gV2lyZWxlc3MgQmxhY2tCZXJyeQ0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0t LQ0KRnJvbTogIkphY2sgUGhpbGxpcHMiIDxwaWV0Zmx5ckBiZWxsc291dGgubmV0Pg0KDQpEYXRl OiBUdWUsIDI1IEF1ZyAyMDA5IDE5OjMzOjM4IA0KVG86IDxwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25p Y3MuY29tPg0KU3ViamVjdDogUkU6IFBpZXRlbnBvbC1MaXN0OiBGbHlpbmcgYmVoaW5kIGEgc2ls ZW50IENvcnZhaXINCg0KDQpObyB3b3JzZSB0aGFuICJJY2FydXMgUGx1bW1ldCIsIGFsdGhvdWdo IGEgbG90IG9mIHBlb3BsZSBkb24ndCB1bmRlcnN0YW5kDQp0aGUgcmVmZXJlbmNlLg0KDQogDQoN CkphY2sgUGhpbGxpcHMNCg0KTlg4OTlKUA0KDQogDQoNCiAgX19fX18gIA0KDQpGcm9tOiBvd25l ci1waWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KW21haWx0bzpvd25lci1waWV0 ZW5wb2wtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbV0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIFJpY2sgSG9sbGFu ZA0KU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgQXVndXN0IDI1LCAyMDA5IDY6NDYgUE0NClRvOiBwaWV0ZW5wb2wt bGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogUGlldGVucG9sLUxpc3Q6IEZseWluZyBi ZWhpbmQgYSBzaWxlbnQgQ29ydmFpcg0KDQogDQoNCiJVbnNhZmUgYXQgYW55IHNwZWVkIiAtIHRo YXQncyB3aGF0IEkgd2FzIHRoaW5raW5nIG9mIHBhaW50aW5nIG9uIHRoZSBzaWRlDQpvZiBteSBQ aWV0LiBQcm9iYWJseSB3b3VsZG4ndCBnZXQgbWFueSBwYXNzZW5nZXJzIHZvbHVudGVlcmluZyB0 byB0YWtlIHJpZGVzDQp0aG91Z2guDQoNCnJpY2sNCg0KT24gTW9uLCBBdWcgMjQsIDIwMDkgYXQg Njo0OCBQTSwgc2hhZCBiZWxsIDxhdmlhdG9yYmVsbEB5YWhvby5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQoNCg0K DQpIZXkgRmVsbG93IFBpZXQnZXJzLCBJIGhhZCBmdW4gZmx5aW5nIHRoZSBwYXN0IGZldyBkYXlz LCByYWNraW5nIHVwIGFsbW9zdCA0DQpocnMgb2YganVzdCBlbmpveWluZyB0aGUgbmljZSB3ZWF0 aGVyIHVudGlsbCwgIEkgZmlubmFsbHkgZm91bmQgb3V0IGhvdw0KcXVpZXQgYSBwaWV0IGlzIHdo ZW4gdGhlIGVuZ2luZSBzdG9wcyBpbiBmbGlnaHQuLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4ud2FpdCBmb3INCml0 Li4uLi4uLndhaXQgZm9yIGl0ICh3YWl0aW5nIGZvciB0aGUgY29ydmFpciBoYXRlcnMgdG8gc2xp bmcgc29tZSBtdWQpLg0KQnV0LCBJIHNodXQgaXQgb2ZmIGp1c3QgdG8gc2VlIHdoYXQgaXQgd2Fz IGxpa2UuICBJIGNsaW1iZWQgdXAgdG8gNDAwMGZ0LA0KYWJvdXQgMzAwMGFnbCwgYW5kIHNodXQg aGVyIGRvd24sIGFuZCB3YXMganVzdCBlbmpveWluZyB0aGUgc2lsZW5jZSwgYW5kDQpjb21wYXJp bmcgdGhlIHNpbmsgcmF0ZSBhbmQgZmVlbGluZyB3aXRoIHRoZSBwcm9wIHN0b3BwZWQuICBJdCBz ZWVtZWQgdG8NCmdsaWRlIGEgbGl0dGxlIGJldHRlciBzaHV0IGRvd24gdGhhbiB3aXRoIHRoZSBl bmdpbmUgYXQgaWRsZSwgYnV0IG1heWJlIGl0DQpqdXN0IHNlZW1lZCBsb25nZXIuICBBbnl3YXkg YWZ0ZXIgbG9vc2luZyAxMDAwZnQgSSBoaXQgdGhlIHN0YXJ0ZXIgYnV0dG9uDQphbmQgc2hlIGx1 cmNoZWQgZm9yd2FyZCBsaWtlIGEgcm9ja2V0IGF0IG9ubHkgMS80IHRocm90dGxlLiAgSSBmaWd1 cmVkIEkNCndvdWxkIHJhdGhlciBleHBlcmlhbmNlIHRoZSBkZWFkIHN0aWNrIHRoZSAxc3QgdGlt ZSB3aGVuIEkgZXhwZWN0ZWQgaXQsIGFuZA0Kbm90IGJlIHN1cHByaXplZC4gIEkgaGF2ZSBoYWQg YSBibGFzdCB0cnlpbmcgdG8gYnVybiB0aGUgcmVtYWluaW5nIDEzMCBnYWwNCm9mIDEwMExMIEkg Ym91Z2h0IGZvciB0aGUgeWVhciwgSSBvbmx5IGhhdmUgMi0zIG1vbnRocyBhbmQgdGhlbiBpdCdz IGp1c3QNCnRvbyBjb2xkLiAgDQoNCiANCg0KRW5qb3kgdGhvc2UgYWlyY3JhZnQgZW5naW5lcywg dGhleSBhcmUgZ29vZCB0b28sIFRoZXkgYmV0dGVyIGJlLCBteSBwcm9qZWN0DQppcyBhIHNtYWxs IGJpcGUgd2l0aCBvbmx5IDE2ZnQgc3BhbiBhbmQgaXQgaGFzIGEgbHljLCBvdXIgY2Fzc3V0dCB3 aWxsIG5lZWQNCmEgMC0yMDAsIGFuZCBib3RoIGdsaWRlIGxpa2UgYSBzdHJlYW1saW5lZCBjcm93 YmFyLg0KDQogDQoNClNoYWQNCg0KQ29ydmFpcjogIlVuc2FmZSBhdCBhbnkgc3BlZWQiIGhlIGhl IGhlDQoNCiANCg0KIA0KIA0KIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3Mu Y29tL05hdmlnYXRvcj9QaWV0ZW5wb2wtTGlzdA0KdHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0K X2JsYW5rIj5odHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uDQogDQoNCg0KDQoN Ci0tIA0KUmljayBIb2xsYW5kDQpDYXN0bGUgUm9jaywgQ29sb3JhZG8NCg0KIkxvZ2ljIGlzIGEg d3JlYXRoIG9mIHByZXR0eSBmbG93ZXJzLCB0aGF0IHNtZWxsIGJhZCIgDQoNCiANCiANCiANCg0K


    Message 45


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:57:58 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU
    be there wit
    From: "Bill Church" <eng@canadianrogers.com>
    Go Jerry! -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Jerry Dotson Sent: Tue 25/08/2009 7:41 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit When I said I wasn't setting a time I meant....wellll if it takes to 2012 to do it right...OK. Late 2010 looks reasonable. That may change stay tuned. In the mid eighties I built my home (10 months) I decided to build my own red oak cabinets. It took me 6 weeks when I thought it might take 2! -------- Jerry Dotson 59 Daniel Johnson Rd Baker, FL 32531 Started building NX510JD July, 2009 Ribs all done using Lycoming O-235 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259582#259582


    Message 46


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:14:58 PM PST US
    From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Flying behind a silent Corvair
    I got the idea from the old "Pogo" comic strip by Walt Kelly. One of the characters was a kangaroo who flew a rickity old biplane. Here's the strip. Ever since I saw that, I decided if I ever built an airplane it would be an "Icarus Plummet, S.O.S. Mayday Model" Jack _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of amsafetyc@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:54 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair Actually I loved the irony of the name. I wish something as neat will come to mind for mine John Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry _____ From: "Jack Phillips" Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair No worse than "Icarus Plummet", although a lot of people don't understand the reference. Jack Phillips NX899JP _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Holland Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:46 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair "Unsafe at any speed" - that's what I was thinking of painting on the side of my Piet. Probably wouldn't get many passengers volunteering to take rides though. rick On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> wrote: Hey Fellow Piet'ers, I had fun flying the past few days, racking up almost 4 hrs of just enjoying the nice weather untill, I finnally found out how quiet a piet is when the engine stops in flight................wait for it.......wait for it (waiting for the corvair haters to sling some mud). But, I shut it off just to see what it was like. I climbed up to 4000ft, about 3000agl, and shut her down, and was just enjoying the silence, and comparing the sink rate and feeling with the prop stopped. It seemed to glide a little better shut down than with the engine at idle, but maybe it just seemed longer. Anyway after loosing 1000ft I hit the starter button and she lurched forward like a rocket at only 1/4 throttle. I figured I would rather experiance the dead stick the 1st time when I expected it, and not be supprized. I have had a blast trying to burn the remaining 130 gal of 100LL I bought for the year, I only have 2-3 months and then it's just too cold. Enjoy those aircraft engines, they are good too, They better be, my project is a small bipe with only 16ft span and it has a lyc, our cassutt will need a 0-200, and both glide like a streamlined crowbar. Shad Corvair: "Unsafe at any speed" he he he " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 47


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:14:58 PM PST US
    From: John Hofmann <jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com>
    Subject: Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair
    If you are an old race fan, I would call it "The Greatest Spectacle in Recine" with a couple of checkered flag wings. John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150 Fax: 608.443.2474 Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com On Aug 25, 2009, at 6:53 PM, amsafetyc@aol.com wrote: > Actually I loved the irony of the name. I wish something as neat > will come to mind for mine > > John > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > > From: "Jack Phillips" > Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:33:38 -0400 > To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com> > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair > > No worse than =93Icarus Plummet=94, although a lot of people don=92t > understand the reference. > > Jack Phillips > NX899JP > > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com > ] On Behalf Of Rick Holland > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:46 PM > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair > > "Unsafe at any speed" - that's what I was thinking of painting on > the side of my Piet. Probably wouldn't get many passengers > volunteering to take rides though. > > rick > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Hey Fellow Piet'ers, I had fun flying the past few days, racking up > almost 4 hrs of just enjoying the nice weather untill, I finnally > found out how quiet a piet is when the engine stops in > flight................wait for it.......wait for it (waiting for the > corvair haters to sling some mud). But, I shut it off just to see > what it was like. I climbed up to 4000ft, about 3000agl, and shut > her down, and was just enjoying the silence, and comparing the sink > rate and feeling with the prop stopped. It seemed to glide a little > better shut down than with the engine at idle, but maybe it just > seemed longer. Anyway after loosing 1000ft I hit the starter button > and she lurched forward like a rocket at only 1/4 throttle. I > figured I would rather experiance the dead stick the 1st time when I > expected it, and not be supprized. I have had a blast trying to > burn the remaining 130 gal of 100LL I bought for the year, I only > have 2-3 months and then it's just too cold. > > Enjoy those aircraft engines, they are good too, They better be, my > project is a small bipe with only 16ft span and it has a lyc, our > cassutt will need a 0-200, and both glide like a streamlined crowbar. > > Shad > Corvair: "Unsafe at any speed" he he he > > > " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > -- > Rick Holland > Castle Rock, Colorado > > "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > http://forums.matronics.com > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > Matronics --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List ============== http://forums.matronics.com ============== >


    Message 48


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:23:05 PM PST US
    From: "Lagowski Morrow" <jimdeb@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair
    Speaking of Icarus, read the book "Chasing Icarus"--Jim Lagowski Do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Phillips To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:33 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair No worse than "Icarus Plummet", although a lot of people don't understand the reference. Jack Phillips NX899JP ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Holland Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:46 PM To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair "Unsafe at any speed" - that's what I was thinking of painting on the side of my Piet. Probably wouldn't get many passengers volunteering to take rides though. rick On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> wrote: Hey Fellow Piet'ers, I had fun flying the past few days, racking up almost 4 hrs of just enjoying the nice weather untill, I finnally found out how quiet a piet is when the engine stops in flight................wait for it.......wait for it (waiting for the corvair haters to sling some mud). But, I shut it off just to see what it was like. I climbed up to 4000ft, about 3000agl, and shut her down, and was just enjoying the silence, and comparing the sink rate and feeling with the prop stopped. It seemed to glide a little better shut down than with the engine at idle, but maybe it just seemed longer. Anyway after loosing 1000ft I hit the starter button and she lurched forward like a rocket at only 1/4 throttle. I figured I would rather experiance the dead stick the 1st time when I expected it, and not be supprized. I have had a blast trying to burn the remaining 130 gal of 100LL I bought for the year, I only have 2-3 months and then it's just too cold. Enjoy those aircraft engines, they are good too, They better be, my project is a small bipe with only 16ft span and it has a lyc, our cassutt will need a 0-200, and both glide like a streamlined crowbar. Shad Corvair: "Unsafe at any speed" he he he " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listtp://f orums.matronics.com_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics. comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 08/24/09 12:55:00


    Message 49


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:31:09 PM PST US
    From: "Lagowski Morrow" <jimdeb@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: Progress Report
    I built my wings on a table consisting of two used hollow panel doors which were joined by stringers on each side to make one long table on saw horses. Worked just fine. The doors cost me $20 total from a building mat'l reuse place. The spars were set up on 2 by 4's and the ribs slid on.--Jim Lagowski ----- Original Message ----- From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:33 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Progress Report > > Having never done this before (full scale) I just took a page out of Tony > Bengelis' construction manuals (and some R/C experience) and built a > vertical jig. I never really considered building them on a table top. I > did build a few R/C wings back in the 80s on a table top, but I've used an > elevated wing jig on those too since the early 90s. To answer you > question Gary... yes, I slid my ribs into place while the spars were > supported by the jig. I hope this method works out ok. The only thing I > am concerned about is that the jig supports are 8' apart (the width of my > workbench), so I may encounter some sagging in the middle (?) not sure. > I'll take some measurements tonight to see if an extra support might be > required. > > Anyone have any suggestions concerning this method? > > -------- > Mark - working on wings > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259457#259457 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 12:55:00


    Message 50


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:50:22 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair
    From: amsafetyc@aol.com
    TmVhdCBpZGVhIA0KDQpUaGFua3MNClNlbnQgZnJvbSBteSBWZXJpem9uIFdpcmVsZXNzIEJsYWNr QmVycnkNCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IEpvaG4gSG9mbWFubiA8 amhvZm1hbm5AcmVlc2dyb3VwaW5jLmNvbT4NCg0KRGF0ZTogVHVlLCAyNSBBdWcgMjAwOSAxOTow NzoyMCANClRvOiA8cGlldGVucG9sLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBQ aWV0ZW5wb2wtTGlzdDogRmx5aW5nIGJlaGluZCBhIHNpbGVudCBDb3J2YWlyDQoNCg0KSWYgeW91 IGFyZSBhbiBvbGQgcmFjZSBmYW4sIEkgd291bGQgY2FsbCBpdCAiVGhlIEdyZWF0ZXN0IFNwZWN0 YWNsZSBpbiAgDQpSZWNpbmUiIHdpdGggYSBjb3VwbGUgb2YgY2hlY2tlcmVkIGZsYWcgd2luZ3Mu DQoNCg0KSm9obiBIb2ZtYW5uDQpWaWNlLVByZXNpZGVudCwgSW5mb3JtYXRpb24gVGVjaG5vbG9n eQ0KVGhlIFJlZXMgR3JvdXAsIEluYy4NCjI4MTAgQ3Jvc3Nyb2FkcyBEcml2ZSwgU3RlIDM4MDAN Ck1hZGlzb24sIFdJIDUzNzE4DQpQaG9uZTogNjA4LjQ0My4yNDY4IGV4dCAxNTANCkZheDogNjA4 LjQ0My4yNDc0DQpFbWFpbDogamhvZm1hbm5AcmVlc2dyb3VwaW5jLmNvbQ0KDQpPbiBBdWcgMjUs IDIwMDksIGF0IDY6NTMgUE0sIGFtc2FmZXR5Y0Bhb2wuY29tIHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IEFjdHVhbGx5 IEkgbG92ZWQgdGhlIGlyb255IG9mIHRoZSBuYW1lLiBJIHdpc2ggc29tZXRoaW5nIGFzIG5lYXQg IA0KPiB3aWxsIGNvbWUgdG8gbWluZCBmb3IgbWluZQ0KPg0KPiBKb2huDQo+IFNlbnQgZnJvbSBt eSBWZXJpem9uIFdpcmVsZXNzIEJsYWNrQmVycnkNCj4NCj4NCj4gRnJvbTogIkphY2sgUGhpbGxp cHMiDQo+IERhdGU6IFR1ZSwgMjUgQXVnIDIwMDkgMTk6MzM6MzggLTA0MDANCj4gVG86IDxwaWV0 ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPg0KPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogUGlldGVucG9sLUxpc3Q6 IEZseWluZyBiZWhpbmQgYSBzaWxlbnQgQ29ydmFpcg0KPg0KPiBObyB3b3JzZSB0aGFuIJNJY2Fy dXMgUGx1bW1ldJQsIGFsdGhvdWdoIGEgbG90IG9mIHBlb3BsZSBkb26SdCAgDQo+IHVuZGVyc3Rh bmQgdGhlIHJlZmVyZW5jZS4NCj4NCj4gSmFjayBQaGlsbGlwcw0KPiBOWDg5OUpQDQo+DQo+IEZy b206IG93bmVyLXBpZXRlbnBvbC1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIFttYWlsdG86b3du ZXItcGlldGVucG9sLWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20gDQo+IF0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9m IFJpY2sgSG9sbGFuZA0KPiBTZW50OiBUdWVzZGF5LCBBdWd1c3QgMjUsIDIwMDkgNjo0NiBQTQ0K PiBUbzogcGlldGVucG9sLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogUGlldGVu cG9sLUxpc3Q6IEZseWluZyBiZWhpbmQgYSBzaWxlbnQgQ29ydmFpcg0KPg0KPiAiVW5zYWZlIGF0 IGFueSBzcGVlZCIgLSB0aGF0J3Mgd2hhdCBJIHdhcyB0aGlua2luZyBvZiBwYWludGluZyBvbiAg DQo+IHRoZSBzaWRlIG9mIG15IFBpZXQuIFByb2JhYmx5IHdvdWxkbid0IGdldCBtYW55IHBhc3Nl bmdlcnMgIA0KPiB2b2x1bnRlZXJpbmcgdG8gdGFrZSByaWRlcyB0aG91Z2guDQo+DQo+IHJpY2sN Cj4NCj4gT24gTW9uLCBBdWcgMjQsIDIwMDkgYXQgNjo0OCBQTSwgc2hhZCBiZWxsIDxhdmlhdG9y YmVsbEB5YWhvby5jb20+ICANCj4gd3JvdGU6DQo+DQo+DQo+IEhleSBGZWxsb3cgUGlldCdlcnMs IEkgaGFkIGZ1biBmbHlpbmcgdGhlIHBhc3QgZmV3IGRheXMsIHJhY2tpbmcgdXAgIA0KPiBhbG1v c3QgNCBocnMgb2YganVzdCBlbmpveWluZyB0aGUgbmljZSB3ZWF0aGVyIHVudGlsbCwgIEkgZmlu bmFsbHkgIA0KPiBmb3VuZCBvdXQgaG93IHF1aWV0IGEgcGlldCBpcyB3aGVuIHRoZSBlbmdpbmUg c3RvcHMgaW4gIA0KPiBmbGlnaHQuLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4ud2FpdCBmb3IgaXQuLi4uLi4ud2Fp dCBmb3IgaXQgKHdhaXRpbmcgZm9yIHRoZSAgDQo+IGNvcnZhaXIgaGF0ZXJzIHRvIHNsaW5nIHNv bWUgbXVkKS4gIEJ1dCwgSSBzaHV0IGl0IG9mZiBqdXN0IHRvIHNlZSAgDQo+IHdoYXQgaXQgd2Fz IGxpa2UuICBJIGNsaW1iZWQgdXAgdG8gNDAwMGZ0LCBhYm91dCAzMDAwYWdsLCBhbmQgc2h1dCAg DQo+IGhlciBkb3duLCBhbmQgd2FzIGp1c3QgZW5qb3lpbmcgdGhlIHNpbGVuY2UsIGFuZCBjb21w YXJpbmcgdGhlIHNpbmsgIA0KPiByYXRlIGFuZCBmZWVsaW5nIHdpdGggdGhlIHByb3Agc3RvcHBl ZC4gIEl0IHNlZW1lZCB0byBnbGlkZSBhIGxpdHRsZSAgDQo+IGJldHRlciBzaHV0IGRvd24gdGhh biB3aXRoIHRoZSBlbmdpbmUgYXQgaWRsZSwgYnV0IG1heWJlIGl0IGp1c3QgIA0KPiBzZWVtZWQg bG9uZ2VyLiAgQW55d2F5IGFmdGVyIGxvb3NpbmcgMTAwMGZ0IEkgaGl0IHRoZSBzdGFydGVyIGJ1 dHRvbiAgDQo+IGFuZCBzaGUgbHVyY2hlZCBmb3J3YXJkIGxpa2UgYSByb2NrZXQgYXQgb25seSAx LzQgdGhyb3R0bGUuICBJICANCj4gZmlndXJlZCBJIHdvdWxkIHJhdGhlciBleHBlcmlhbmNlIHRo ZSBkZWFkIHN0aWNrIHRoZSAxc3QgdGltZSB3aGVuIEkgIA0KPiBleHBlY3RlZCBpdCwgYW5kIG5v dCBiZSBzdXBwcml6ZWQuICBJIGhhdmUgaGFkIGEgYmxhc3QgdHJ5aW5nIHRvICANCj4gYnVybiB0 aGUgcmVtYWluaW5nIDEzMCBnYWwgb2YgMTAwTEwgSSBib3VnaHQgZm9yIHRoZSB5ZWFyLCBJIG9u bHkgIA0KPiBoYXZlIDItMyBtb250aHMgYW5kIHRoZW4gaXQncyBqdXN0IHRvbyBjb2xkLg0KPg0K PiBFbmpveSB0aG9zZSBhaXJjcmFmdCBlbmdpbmVzLCB0aGV5IGFyZSBnb29kIHRvbywgVGhleSBi ZXR0ZXIgYmUsIG15ICANCj4gcHJvamVjdCBpcyBhIHNtYWxsIGJpcGUgd2l0aCBvbmx5IDE2ZnQg c3BhbiBhbmQgaXQgaGFzIGEgbHljLCBvdXIgIA0KPiBjYXNzdXR0IHdpbGwgbmVlZCBhIDAtMjAw LCBhbmQgYm90aCBnbGlkZSBsaWtlIGEgc3RyZWFtbGluZWQgY3Jvd2Jhci4NCj4NCj4gU2hhZA0K PiBDb3J2YWlyOiAiVW5zYWZlIGF0IGFueSBzcGVlZCIgaGUgaGUgaGUNCj4NCj4NCj4NCj4gIiB0 YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL05hdmlnYXRvcj9QaWV0ZW5w b2wtTGlzdA0KPiB0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQo+X2JsYW5rIj5odHRwOi8vd3d3 Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uDQo+DQo+DQo+DQo+DQo+IC0tIA0KPiBSaWNrIEhv bGxhbmQNCj4gQ2FzdGxlIFJvY2ssIENvbG9yYWRvDQo+DQo+ICJMb2dpYyBpcyBhIHdyZWF0aCBv ZiBwcmV0dHkgZmxvd2VycywgdGhhdCBzbWVsbCBiYWQiDQo+DQo+DQo+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UGlldGVucG9sLUxpc3QNCj4gaHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRy b25pY3MuY29tDQo+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24NCj4NCk1h dHJvbmljcyAgDQoNCi0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vTmF2aWdhdG9yP1BpZXRl bnBvbC1MaXN0IA0KPT09PT09PT09PT09PT0gIA0KDQpodHRwOi8vZm9ydW1zLm1hdHJvbmljcy5j b20gDQo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PSAgDQoNCg0KPg0KDQo


    Message 51


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:55:27 PM PST US
    From: TOM MICHELLE BRANT <tmbrant@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU
    be there wit I just tell people I'll be done in September. When they reply "really - do n't you have a lot left to do?" I just say=2C yes - but I'll still be done by September - I didn't say which year. > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- w ill YOU be there wit > Date: Tue=2C 25 Aug 2009 19:54:59 -0400 > From: eng@canadianrogers.com > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > > Go Jerry! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of Jerry Dotson > Sent: Tue 25/08/2009 7:41 PM > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: 85th Anniversary of Pietenpol design-- will YOU be there wit > > > When I said I wasn't setting a time I meant....wellll if it takes to 2012 to do it right...OK. Late 2010 looks reasonable. That may change stay tune d. In the mid eighties I built my home (10 months) I decided to build my ow n red oak cabinets. It took me 6 weeks when I thought it might take 2! > > -------- > Jerry Dotson > 59 Daniel Johnson Rd > Baker=2C FL 32531 > > Started building NX510JD July=2C 2009 > Ribs all done > using Lycoming O-235 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259582#259582 > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 52


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:59:16 PM PST US
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Subject: Bingelis books
    That's great Mike-- I know that's one of the first things we talked about and you ordered those books up front trusting me (your first mistake:) and they are GREAT BOOKS !!!!!!!!!!!! Before this list was started (back in the olden days when Utah Steve E. from BYU started the e-mail list) when we used to write our questions and replies on stone tablets and pass them around, I would get to scratching my head on a certain part of the plane late at night and WHALA---- Tony had my answer in his books ! I got so much lousy info from guys at the airport, other builders, and supposed airplane experts that I would always use the Bingelis books as a litmus test to see what he thought--Tony was and still is a tremendous asset to airplane builders everywhere. I wore out my Bingelis books and just a few weeks ago had to get them out to look up cable nicopressing order on 1/8" cable nicopress sleeves. He's been gone for several years now but God bless him-- he's still helping us out--we just have to read up in the index and see where he covers it. EAA.org carries all of the Bingelis book series or you can fine sets of them on ebay or Amazon.com sometimes at better prices when widows (airplanes are dangerous and old guys with airplanes die regularly of nature causes:)) sell them. Mike C.


    Message 53


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:01:33 PM PST US
    From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation]" <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
    Subject: One builder's rule of thumb-- how long will it take ?
    I thought I'd be flying in two years. It took 4.5 years. Everything I thought would take X amount of time took Two Times X...or a bit longer. Mike C.


    Message 54


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:37:20 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Progress Report
    From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net>
    I have two heavy duty 8' x 4' tables with leveling feet that can be placed end to end in order to make a single 16' x 4' table. Would that be recommended? Does anyone see difficulties with the way I am approaching my wings? I really haven't got too far with them, and I don't have much invested in the jigs... if there is a better way, or good reasons to have them flat, please speak up. I've never done this before on full scale stuff... so I'm sure there is plenty I don't know. I just look for pictures and try to copy what I see. [Laughing] -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259608#259608


    Message 55


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:42:41 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: One builder's rule of thumb-- how long will it take
    ?
    From: "Jerry Dotson" <jdotson@erec.net>
    That is very comforting Michael. How long will it take? When I finish I will tell. It has been 35 years or more since I did rib stitching but I remember it as like watching grass grow in Arizona. -------- Jerry Dotson 59 Daniel Johnson Rd Baker, FL 32531 Started building NX510JD July, 2009 Ribs all done using Lycoming O-235 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259610#259610


    Message 56


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:56:12 PM PST US
    From: Kip and Beth Gardner <kipandbeth@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair
    Jack, Always loved your choice of a name - never any mention of wax, however, so I assume you won't have the same problem (besides, i think the problem altitude is a lot higher than your ceiling). Considering calling mine "sweetie" - along with a graphic of a skunk peaking out of a darkened hangar. Kip Gardner On Aug 25, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Jack Phillips wrote: > No worse than =93Icarus Plummet=94, although a lot of people don=92t > understand the reference. > > Jack Phillips > NX899JP > > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner- > pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Holland > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:46 PM > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair > > "Unsafe at any speed" - that's what I was thinking of painting on > the side of my Piet. Probably wouldn't get many passengers > volunteering to take rides though. > > rick > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Hey Fellow Piet'ers, I had fun flying the past few days, racking up > almost 4 hrs of just enjoying the nice weather untill, I finnally > found out how quiet a piet is when the engine stops in > flight................wait for it.......wait for it (waiting for > the corvair haters to sling some mud). But, I shut it off just to > see what it was like. I climbed up to 4000ft, about 3000agl, and > shut her down, and was just enjoying the silence, and comparing the > sink rate and feeling with the prop stopped. It seemed to glide a > little better shut down than with the engine at idle, but maybe it > just seemed longer. Anyway after loosing 1000ft I hit the starter > button and she lurched forward like a rocket at only 1/4 throttle. > I figured I would rather experiance the dead stick the 1st time > when I expected it, and not be supprized. I have had a blast > trying to burn the remaining 130 gal of 100LL I bought for the > year, I only have 2-3 months and then it's just too cold. > > Enjoy those aircraft engines, they are good too, They better be, my > project is a small bipe with only 16ft span and it has a lyc, our > cassutt will need a 0-200, and both glide like a streamlined crowbar. > > Shad > Corvair: "Unsafe at any speed" he he he > > > " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > -- > Rick Holland > Castle Rock, Colorado > > "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > http://forums.matronics.com > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > >


    Message 57


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:00:42 PM PST US
    From: Kip and Beth Gardner <kipandbeth@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Flying behind a silent Corvair
    Thought I'd seen almost every Pogo strip ever drawn, but somehow I missed this one - makes your choice even better IMHO. Kip Gardner do not archive On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:04 PM, Jack Phillips wrote: > I got the idea from the old =93Pogo=94 comic strip by Walt Kelly. One > of the characters was a kangaroo who flew a rickity old biplane. > Here=92s the strip=85 > > <image001.jpg> > > Ever since I saw that, I decided if I ever built an airplane it > would be an =93Icarus Plummet, S.O.S. Mayday Model=94 > > Jack > > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner- > pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of amsafetyc@aol.com > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:54 PM > To: Pietenpol builders Board > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair > > Actually I loved the irony of the name. I wish something as neat > will come to mind for mine > > John > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > From: "Jack Phillips" > Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:33:38 -0400 > To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com> > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair > No worse than =93Icarus Plummet=94, although a lot of people don=92t > understand the reference. > > Jack Phillips > NX899JP > > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner- > pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Holland > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:46 PM > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Flying behind a silent Corvair > > "Unsafe at any speed" - that's what I was thinking of painting on > the side of my Piet. Probably wouldn't get many passengers > volunteering to take rides though. > > rick > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Hey Fellow Piet'ers, I had fun flying the past few days, racking up > almost 4 hrs of just enjoying the nice weather untill, I finnally > found out how quiet a piet is when the engine stops in > flight................wait for it.......wait for it (waiting for > the corvair haters to sling some mud). But, I shut it off just to > see what it was like. I climbed up to 4000ft, about 3000agl, and > shut her down, and was just enjoying the silence, and comparing the > sink rate and feeling with the prop stopped. It seemed to glide a > little better shut down than with the engine at idle, but maybe it > just seemed longer. Anyway after loosing 1000ft I hit the starter > button and she lurched forward like a rocket at only 1/4 throttle. > I figured I would rather experiance the dead stick the 1st time > when I expected it, and not be supprized. I have had a blast > trying to burn the remaining 130 gal of 100LL I bought for the > year, I only have 2-3 months and then it's just too cold. > > Enjoy those aircraft engines, they are good too, They better be, my > project is a small bipe with only 16ft span and it has a lyc, our > cassutt will need a 0-200, and both glide like a streamlined crowbar. > > Shad > Corvair: "Unsafe at any speed" he he he > > > " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > -- > Rick Holland > Castle Rock, Colorado > > "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > > http://forums.matronics.com > > http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 58


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:10:34 PM PST US
    Subject: Markle-Helsper visit
    From: helspersew@aol.com
    Good People, Jim Markle just left here after a very fruitful 3 hour visit, complete with a still-air, late evening airplane ride over lush, green midwestern farm country in my Aeronca Sedan.?Many good conversations, and conclusions were drawn, that the guys on this list, and everybody that shows up at Brodhead are the Best. Thanks to Jim for providing the KFC. Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. P.S. John Racine- I took a complete inventory of all my possessions after Jim left. The only thing missing was a small bottle of water.


    Message 59


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:36:24 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Markle-Helsper visit
    From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net>
    Ah HA!! He's hording water now. [Laughing] Glad you and Jim had a nice visit. Of course I am a bit jealous that Jim got an airplane ride. -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259623#259623


    Message 60


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:41:51 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Progress Report
    From: "TulsaFlyer" <gbloud1@netzero.net>
    No Mark!!!! Your doing it all wrong!! That looks like SHI............!!!!!! Let me know when, and I'll come haul all of that junk away so you can start over and do it right. [Wink] Seriously, it's looking good. I see no problem with the way you are doing it. Just make sure there is no bow in the middle. (I seriously doubt there is.) Later, Jody Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259624#259624


    Message 61


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:53:13 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Markle-Helsper visit
    From: amsafetyc@aol.com
    Wow Dan you are fortunate. Check your table saw blades. Since I couldn't find my table saw after he left my shop he's bound to need some new blades by now. Had to be a great visit however any chicken farmer bringing KFC well it does make one wonder? You were sitting there eating with a fourflusher feeding you KFC getting you full so he can work his ways with you to take him flying. Dan its the oldest trick in the book! Son, I say son We call It "the Markle Chicken strut trick". I knew we should have told ya bout that one You know Jim is quite a good friend and always a pleasure to have him visit. That is if you're into frisking guys, Jim enjoys it! Glad you guys were able to get together John ------Original Message------ From: helspersew@aol.com Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com ReplyTo: Pietenpol builders Board Sent: Aug 25, 2009 10:03 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Markle-Helsper visit Good People, Jim Markle just left here after a very fruitful 3 hour visit, complete with a still-air, late evening airplane ride over lush, green midwestern farm country in my Aeronca Sedan.Many good conversations, and conclusions were drawn, that the guys on this list, and everybody that shows up at Brodhead are the Best. Thanks to Jim for providing the KFC. Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry


    Message 62


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:54:40 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Markle-Helsper visit
    From: amsafetyc@aol.com
    Yea but Dan hasn't counted his fingers yet. Wait till he finds out he's a few short. ------Original Message------ From: Mark Chunard Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com ReplyTo: Pietenpol builders Board Sent: Aug 25, 2009 10:32 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Markle-Helsper visit Ah HA!! He's hording water now. [Laughing] Glad you and Jim had a nice visit. Of course I am a bit jealous that Jim got an airplane ride. -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259623#259623 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry


    Message 63


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:58:42 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Progress Report
    From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net>
    TulsaFlyer wrote: > Your doing it all wrong!! That looks like SHI............!!!!!! Damn, thought that was a Markle post for a minute. Just kidding Jim. I was concerned with the spars bowing too, so I went up tonight and cut a brace for the center. It actually was sagging about 1/16" in the center, and may have got a little worse over time, but it seems solid and square now. Hopefully it will hang in there while figure out what I am supposed to do next. Ha ha! -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259629#259629


    Message 64


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:07:10 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Markle-Helsper visit
    From: "K5YAC" <hangar10@cox.net>
    Four Flusher! Haaa ha! I've seen that term used quite a bit lately, but I didn't know what it meant, so I had to go look it up. Funny stuff. I get the feeling that there are a LOT of four flushers around here. -------- Mark - working on wings Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259630#259630


    Message 65


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:52:58 PM PST US
    From: "Clif Dawson" <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: Markle-Helsper visit
    Are you sure that was chicken in the bucket? Clif Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Markle-Helsper visit > > Yea but Dan hasn't counted his fingers yet. Wait till he finds out he's a > few short. > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259623#259623 >


    Message 66


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:13:22 PM PST US
    From: jorge lizarraga <flightwood@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material;exelente
    is great soun bery good deal you cand senmy these adres in sanfrancisco or closed you town surply, i buy a set plywood from spruse bery spense materia l and bery $$$$$$$shiping cost I have loock from cover the side from my fus elaje. tanks for all you help seyou nex jorge from hanford --- On Tue, 8/25/09, brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com <brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com > wrote: From: brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com <brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente I have to agree with=C2- Gary.we have a MacBeath Hardwood here i n SLC, UT and the prices are great I got my Spruce and ply and I don =99t have to pay shipping costs. =C2- Brian SLC, UT =C2- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gary Boothe Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:39 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente =C2- Jorge, =C2- All the 1/8=9D plywood on my project is Marine Mahogany which I purch ased locally. In fact, I just found a new supplier in the San Francisco Bay Area that is far cheaper. The last sheet I bought from MacBeath Hardwood w as $25!! If you just need some scraps for making gussets for your tail, let me know. =C2- Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done,=C2-Fuselage=C2-on gear (13 ribs down) From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jorge lizarraga Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 9:37 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente =C2- hi im jorge from hanford ca, in these moment i folow thw nex step tp build my piet is the tail section stare whit the stavilizer and look you mail is bery nice to have okume plywood sprus sale for the same size 98 a pise 4X8F T IF YOU NOW SOME GUYS BUILD THE SIDE COVER WHIT THESE WOOD YOUNOW . tanks for you mail and seyou nex --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two loc ations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders h ave opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avo id water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). =C2- Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will p revent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked w ith water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuse lage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a ma hogany-like tropical wood).=C2-While it is not quite as strong as Aircraf t ply made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and i s manufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the lower cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, an d available in 4' x 8' sheets. =C2- A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: =C2- =C2- http://www.noahsmarine.com/ http://www.boulterplywood.com/ =C2- Bill C. =C2- =C2-" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.matronics. com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listet=_blank>http://forums.matronics.comllow tar get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2- _________________ =C2- =C2-http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol -List =C2-http://forums.matronics.com =C2-http://www.matronics.com/cont ribution =C2- =C2- =C2-http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-L isthttp://forums.matronics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2- =0A=0A=0A


    Message 67


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:16:36 PM PST US
    From: jorge lizarraga <flightwood@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material
    ho im in the same dilema bery $$$$$$$$$$cost for plywood and shipingif you now somthin about the okume plywood i whis to now if some one use these for cover fuselajo or parts --- On Tue, 8/25/09, Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net> wrote: From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Thank you Bill. Any idea if it is safe to do the side and bottom sheets in pieces as opposed to 6 foot long lengths?- Aircraft Spruce is going to st ick me with a trucking fee, (about $95.00 I believe) to ship 5 pounds of pl ywood because of the length! --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two loc ations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders h ave opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avo id water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). - Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will p revent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked w ith water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuse lage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a ma hogany-like tropical wood).-While it is not quite as strong as Aircraft p ly made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and is m anufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the low er cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, and a vailable in 4' x 8' sheets. - A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: - - http://www.noahsmarine.com/ http://www.boulterplywood.com/ - Bill C. " target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenp ol-List =nofollow>http://forums.matronics.com blank rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/contribution =0A=0A=0A


    Message 68


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:21:42 PM PST US
    From: jorge lizarraga <flightwood@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material;exelente
    ups=C2- tanks for all you inform i used in my plane birch aircraft plywoo d mm. buy in spruse but the last buy shiping chargers is almost the same am ount the wood????if you have thoses scrap pises i like tonow if you like se lmy those . --- On Tue, 8/25/09, brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com <brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com > wrote: From: brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com <brian.e.jardine@L-3com.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente I have to agree with=C2- Gary.we have a MacBeath Hardwood here i n SLC, UT and the prices are great I got my Spruce and ply and I don =99t have to pay shipping costs. =C2- Brian SLC, UT =C2- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gary Boothe Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:39 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente =C2- Jorge, =C2- All the 1/8=9D plywood on my project is Marine Mahogany which I purch ased locally. In fact, I just found a new supplier in the San Francisco Bay Area that is far cheaper. The last sheet I bought from MacBeath Hardwood w as $25!! If you just need some scraps for making gussets for your tail, let me know. =C2- Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done,=C2-Fuselage=C2-on gear (13 ribs down) From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jorge lizarraga Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 9:37 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente =C2- hi im jorge from hanford ca, in these moment i folow thw nex step tp build my piet is the tail section stare whit the stavilizer and look you mail is bery nice to have okume plywood sprus sale for the same size 98 a pise 4X8F T IF YOU NOW SOME GUYS BUILD THE SIDE COVER WHIT THESE WOOD YOUNOW . tanks for you mail and seyou nex --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two loc ations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders h ave opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avo id water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). =C2- Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will p revent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked w ith water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuse lage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a ma hogany-like tropical wood).=C2-While it is not quite as strong as Aircraf t ply made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and i s manufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the lower cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, an d available in 4' x 8' sheets. =C2- A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: =C2- =C2- http://www.noahsmarine.com/ http://www.boulterplywood.com/ =C2- Bill C. =C2- =C2-" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.matronics. com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listet=_blank>http://forums.matronics.comllow tar get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2- _________________ =C2- =C2-http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol -List =C2-http://forums.matronics.com =C2-http://www.matronics.com/cont ribution =C2- =C2- =C2-http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-L isthttp://forums.matronics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2- =0A=0A=0A


    Message 69


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:26:21 PM PST US
    From: jorge lizarraga <flightwood@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Fuselage building and material;exelente ok.
    thanks for all you inform realy I need all hep ypu guys can givemy the spru se cost is bery hit if you cant telmy the adress for those suply you have c an be great and ilike to have thoses scrap plywood you menthioned thanks fo r all you help jorge from hanford seyou nex --- On Tue, 8/25/09, Gary Boothe <gboothe5@comcast.net> wrote: From: Gary Boothe <gboothe5@comcast.net> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente Jorge, =C2- All the 1/8=9D plywood on my project is Marine Mahogany which I purch ased locally. In fact, I just found a new supplier in the San Francisco Bay Area that is far cheaper. The last sheet I bought from MacBeath Hardwood w as $25!! If you just need some scraps for making gussets for your tail, let me know. =C2- Gary Boothe Cool, Ca. Pietenpol WW Corvair Conversion Tail done,=C2-Fuselage=C2-on gear (13 ribs down) From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jorge lizarraga Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 9:37 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material;exelente =C2- hi im jorge from hanford ca, in these moment i folow thw nex step tp build my piet is the tail section stare whit the stavilizer and look you mail is bery nice to have okume plywood sprus sale for the same size 98 a pise 4X8F T IF YOU NOW SOME GUYS BUILD THE SIDE COVER WHIT THESE WOOD YOUNOW . tanks for you mail and seyou nex --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> wrote: From: Bill Church <eng@canadianrogers.com> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuselage building and material Regarding the wedge blocks, I believe they are only required at the two loc ations shown, as reinforcement for landing gear attachment. Some builders h ave opted to use lightweight balsa filler wedges in other locations, to avo id water collection in the pockets (not a bad idea). =C2- Regarding plywood, one important feature of Aircraft grade plywood is that it is manufactured using waterproof (actually boilproof) glues. This will p revent the plies from delaminating, should the wood somehow become soaked w ith water. An economical alternative to Aircraft grade plywood for the fuse lage sides is the use of BS1088 or BS6566 Okoume Marine Ply (Okoume is a ma hogany-like tropical wood).=C2-While it is not quite as strong as Aircraf t ply made of Birch, it is apparently strong enough for this purpose, and i s manufactured using waterproof (also boilproof) glues. In addition to the lower cost, it is also lighter (in weight, as well as color) than Birch, an d available in 4' x 8' sheets. =C2- A couple of sources for Okoume Marine Ply: =C2- =C2- http://www.noahsmarine.com/ http://www.boulterplywood.com/ =C2- Bill C. =C2- =C2-" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.matronics. com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listet=_blank>http://forums.matronics.comllow tar get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2- _________________ =C2- =C2-http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol -Listhttp://forums.matronics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2 - =0A=0A=0A


    Message 70


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:40:01 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: deadstick flying
    From: "Baldeagle" <baldeagle27@earthlink.net>
    You guys that can choose to stop the prop, instead of waiting for the crankshaft to break.......sheesh. I used to do a deadstick aerobatic routine in my stock 1939 Taylorcraft, from 4,000 feet, a five turn spin, then loops, barrel rolls, and reverse cuban 8s. Don't try this at home, but it did it quite well. - Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259648#259648




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --