Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:19 AM - Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (Dave Sornborger)
     2. 04:21 AM - Re: Lee Bottom Fly-In (Tim White Gmail)
     3. 04:23 AM - Re: Question for Westcoast Piet builders and flyers (Gary Boothe)
     4. 04:37 AM - Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (Michael Perez)
     5. 04:49 AM - Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (Gary Boothe)
     6. 05:47 AM - Re: Re: antenna (Jim Ash)
     7. 05:57 AM - Re: antenna (skellytown flyer)
     8. 07:09 AM - Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (Michael Perez)
     9. 07:29 AM - Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts (Kelly Klaus)
    10. 07:49 AM - Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (shad bell)
    11. 08:13 AM - Re: Re: The next future piet'er is here (shad bell)
    12. 08:37 AM - Re: Re: The next future piet'er is here (Gary Boothe)
    13. 08:48 AM - Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (Rick Holland)
    14. 09:01 AM - Re: Re: The next future piet'er is here (Jim Markle)
    15. 09:02 AM - Re: Official Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines (Lagowski Morrow)
    16. 09:03 AM - Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts (Don Emch)
    17. 09:03 AM - Re: Re: The next future piet'er is here (shad bell)
    18. 09:12 AM - Re: Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts (ALAN LYSCARS)
    19. 09:21 AM - Re: Question for Westcoast Piet builders and flyers (AircamperN11MS)
    20. 09:22 AM - Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (Gary Boothe)
    21. 09:32 AM - Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (AircamperN11MS)
    22. 09:45 AM - Re: Official Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines (Ryan Mueller)
    23. 10:14 AM - Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts (Bill Church)
    24. 10:23 AM - Re: Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts (Gary Boothe)
    25. 10:23 AM - Re: Lee Bottom Fly-In (Billy McCaskill)
    26. 10:47 AM - Re: Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts (Ryan Mueller)
    27. 11:04 AM - Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (Ben Charvet)
    28. 11:11 AM - Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts (Bill Church)
    29. 11:23 AM - Re: Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts (Gary Boothe)
    30. 11:24 AM - Re: Thanks for the 	 input-stits-ceconite-stewart (TOM STINEMETZE)
    31. 11:29 AM - Re: Thanks for the 	 input-stits-ceconite-stewart (Jack Phillips)
    32. 11:57 AM - Re: 40 hour fly-off, state of model A (BYD)
    33. 12:20 PM - Re: Re: 40 hour fly-off, state of model A (Ryan Mueller)
    34. 01:48 PM - Re: 40 hour fly-off, state of model A (BYD)
    35. 02:34 PM - Started my rib jig today (JGriff)
    36. 02:45 PM - Re: Started my rib jig today (TOM STINEMETZE)
    37. 03:20 PM - Tailbrace wire idea (Bill Church)
    38. 03:33 PM - Re: Started my rib jig today (Jim Boyer)
    39. 03:51 PM - Re: Started my rib jig today (dwilson)
    40. 03:52 PM - Re: Started my rib jig today (dwilson)
    41. 04:19 PM - Re: Tailbrace wire idea (Gary Boothe)
    42. 04:23 PM - Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart (helspersew@aol.com)
    43. 05:05 PM - Re: Tailbrace wire idea (Tim Willis)
    44. 07:06 PM - Re: Started my rib jig today (Rick Holland)
    45. 08:11 PM - Re: Started my rib jig today (Ben Charvet)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      Thanks Guys,Looks like Stewart is the way to go.Not much into the 
      toxicity levels of the others,not to mention the KaBoom! factor.
         Thanks again.Dave
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Lee Bottom Fly-In | 
      
      His name is Stephen Emo.  He has a hangar at New Carlisle. I believe his 
      dad built it, passed away recently and he flies it about every night and 
      twice on the weekends.  Every time he comes back smiling. 
      
      Tim White
      OH30 & FA38 
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Matthew VanDervort 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 8:16 PM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Lee Bottom Fly-In
      
      
        Shad, there is a red and cream Piet at new Carlisle, has an O-200 with 
      lights and everything, I forget the gentlemens name though, I'll privy 
      see him next time I'm out there, I'll try and find out.
      
        Sent from my iPhone
      
        On Sep 1, 2010, at 8:08 PM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> wrote:
      
      
                Who is planning on going to lee bottom?  I was planning on 
      flying down friday mid-day, and returning sat 3pm or so.  If anyone was 
      flying down from ohio, I was going to see if they want to fly down 
      togeather.  Mike C., When were you planning on going down?  We could 
      leave from here or I can meet up with you at your 1st fuel stop if you 
      want a wingman.  Same for Don, Frank or anyone else who wants to fly 
      down.  By the way, does anyone on here know about a red and cream 
      collered piet in south western ohio (urbana area).  I have a friend at 
      work who is based at Urbana and has seen a piet in there 2-3 times in 
      the past month or so.  I am not aware of another piet down there.  Might 
      be out of New Carlisle Ohio out of Barnhart Memorial?
      
                Shad
      
                p.s.  Joseph Isaac Bell  "Little Joe", is laying here in the 
      crib beside me, dreaming of flying the piet some day. I swear he would 
      almost fit in the hat box. 
      
      
      =========
      >http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      =========
      ums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      =========
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribut
      ion
      =========
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Question for Westcoast Piet builders and flyers | 
      
      Mike,
      
      
      That really was an extreme effort by that chapter! Geographically, Jim 
      Boyer, Mike Weaver, Darrel Jones, Chris Tracy, John McPherson, Charlie 
      Miller & Bob O=99hara (built and flying), me and maybe one or two 
      others, all live within a short drive to Sacramento. For any of us it 
      would be a 7 hour drive south to get to French Valley (southern end of 
      California). 
      
      
      Gary Boothe
      
      Cool, CA
      
      Pietenpol
      
      WW Corvair Conversion
      
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
      20 ribs done
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim 
      Boyer
      Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 8:41 PM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Question for Westcoast Piet builders and 
      flyers
      
      
      Hi Mike,
      
      There are three (Chris Tracy, Gary Boothe, and Mike Weaver) in the 
      Sacramento area, me in Santa Rosa 50 miles N. of San Francisco, Mike 
      Groah in Tulare approximately 100 miles S. of San Francisco, and Charlie 
      Miller a couple hours S. of Tulare. We have a new builder starting in 
      Petaluma, 17 miles S. of Santa Rosa.
      
      
      I not familiar with French Valley.
      
      Cheers,
      
      Jim B.
      
      
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Michael D. Cuy (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation]" 
      <michael.d.cuy@nasa.gov>
      Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2010 2:54:16 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Question for Westcoast Piet builders and flyers
      
      
      Guys--- just  wondering if you all are in the same general area of CA or 
      are you all spread out ?     Just wondering
      
      and thought maybe I=99d expand my knowledge of geography a bit. 
      
      
      Are any of you near the French Valley EAA Chapter who brought that 
      GORGEOUS bare Pietenpol to Brodhead, then
      
      Oshkosh ?        What an EFFORT to bring that thing via truck ALL the 
      way to Wisconsin and back.    Very cool. 
      
      
      Mike C.
      
      
      " target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      p://forums.matronics.com
      blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      You guys using the Stewart's System, did you use their varnish for the bare
       wood prior to covering, if not, what brand/type varnish did you use?
      
      Michael Perez
      =0AKaretaker Aero
      =0Awww.karetakeraero.com
      
      --- On Fri, 9/3/10, Dave Sornborger <dsornbor@aol.com> wrote:
      
      From: Dave Sornborger <dsornbor@aol.com>
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      
      =0A=0A =0AThanks Guys,Looks like Stewart is the way to go.Not much =0Ainto 
      the toxicity levels of the others,not to mention the KaBoom! =0Afactor.=0A
      -- Thanks =0Aagain.Dave=0A=0A=0A=0A
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      Dave,
      
      
      Just for your consideration, there are several on this list, some with
      currently flying Piets, that have used a quality house paint! I'll be using
      the Stewart system to install the fabric, then painting with one such paint.
      They are flexible, uv stable and protective, and bond to most surfaces. 
      
      
      Attached are a couple pics from Brodhead 2009 of Shad and Gary Bell's Piet.
      I think they said their brand was Sears Weatherbeater! The brushed look was
      intentional and gives the appearance of old-time linen.
      
      
      Gary Boothe
      
      Cool, CA
      
      Pietenpol
      
      WW Corvair Conversion
      
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
      20 ribs done
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave
      Sornborger
      Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 4:16 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      
      
      Thanks Guys,Looks like Stewart is the way to go.Not much into the toxicity
      levels of the others,not to mention the KaBoom! factor.
      
         Thanks again.Dave
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I would recommend the use of an SWR meter to adjust the comm antenna once it's
      installed. ELT antennas should already be optimized for their specific frequencies.
      
      I started with one that was too long. Antennas are optimized for a specific frequency;
      I centered my measurements around 121.5 mHz, figuring that was the one
      I probably cared most about. I nipped small sections off the tip of the antenna
      until the SWR results didn't get any better.
      
      I can't really comment on the effect your control cables might have, beyond telling
      you that Faraday's cage was alive and well in my Cub, with all the tubing
      everywhere. I could barely transmit to a local tower well within their 5nm radius.
      I mounted an external and ran a few feet of coax to a BNC connector for
      my handheld to get outside it; problem solved. I'm guessing with a wooden fuselage,
      your cables shouldn't have that much effect. I don't know if the moisture
      in the wood has a significant impact, but I doubt it. If this were microwaves
      (like my TV dish antenna), leaves (epecially wet leaves) and trees seriously
      attenuate the signal. I'm guessing these frequencies are low enough to punch
      through those kinds of problems.
      
      All that being said, it would be interesting to see a Smith chart for your antenna
      mounted in your plane, but that's waaaaaay beyond the scope of normal aircraft
      construction.
      
      Jim Ash
      
      -----Original Message-----
      >From: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854@shaw.ca>
      >Sent: Sep 3, 2010 2:13 AM
      >To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      >Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: antenna
      >
      >The groundplane does not have to be solid. Mine is an
      >aluminum mesh acquired from an art supply house.
      >
      >I've added this antenna article also.
      >
      >My understanding is that you don't have to ground the
      >groundplane to anything else. It IS the " ground " . The
      >coax from the radio is attached to the groundplane.
      >
      >The only concern I have with mine is how it will be
      >affected by the control cabling when I finaly get the
      >thing in the air.
      >
      >Clif
      >
      >
      >> <skellflyer1@yahoo.com>
      >>
      >> This is good information. I like the idea of an internal ground plane 
      >> sheet even if it isn't too big. I am guessing it needs to be grounded to 
      >> the negative battery terminal since it's mounted in a wood fuselage? or 
      >> maybe only the radio grounding from the antenna coax? probably wouldn't 
      >> matter for the ELT but might with a radio antenna as far as interference.
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      interesting thoughts- maybe another good reason to not ground to the battery.time
      will tell.this has been some great information on the replies.thanks Raymond
      do not archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311213#311213
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      That is exactly my plan. (I should have been more specific.) I want to use Stewart's
      to install the fabric, then paint with Glidden Exterior latex. The Stewart's
      varnish is quite expensive...I was curious about a local bought spar varnish
      or other urethane/polyurethane.
      
      Michael Perez
      
      Karetaker Aero
      
      www.karetakeraero.com
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts | 
      
      
      I would also like to purchase 2 XL shirts as well, outstanding design!
      
      --------
      Kelly Klaus
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311222#311222
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      Dad's-is Ceco-bond ans Minwax spar varnish throughout.- If the glue is 
      water based I would just use spar varnish, the outdoor stuff of course.
      -
      Shad
      
      --- On Fri, 9/3/10, Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
      
      
      From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      
      
      That is exactly my plan. (I should have been more specific.) I want to use 
      Stewart's to install the fabric, then paint with Glidden Exterior latex. Th
      e Stewart's varnish is quite expensive...I was curious about a local bought
       spar varnish or other urethane/polyurethane.
      
      Michael Perez
      Karetaker Aero
      www.karetakeraero.com
      
      
      =0A=0A=0A      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: The next future piet'er is here | 
      
      It might be a few weeks, mom probably won't want him out in the hanger for 
      a little while.- Moms dont want us to ruin that new baby smell.
      -
      Shad
      p.s. here is a pic of the oldest by the piet, finding all the oil spots.
      
      --- On Thu, 9/2/10, Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com> wrote:
      
      
      From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com>
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: The next future piet'er is here
      
      
      Shad, I know this won't be easy but how soon to you think you can get a pic
      ture of the little guy in your Piet? 
      
      rick
      
      
      On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:15 PM, kevinpurtee <kevin.purtee@us.army.mil> wrot
      e:
      
      il>
      
      Shad - Congrats! -Any pictures of the new boy?
      
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Kevin Purtee
      NX899KP
      Austin/Georgetown, TX
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311136#311136
      
      
      st" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      http://forums.matronics.com
      le, List Admin.
      ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" 
      
      
      =0A=0A=0A      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: The next future piet'er is here | 
      
      No problem there, Shad. Just get some av-gas on your finger.the smell will
      linger for awhile.pass it under his nose just before you hand him to mama
      for a feeding. He'll soon learn that aviation fuel = sustenance. Who knows?
      I'll bet that's what your dad did for you.
      
      
      Gary Boothe
      
      Cool, CA
      
      Pietenpol
      
      WW Corvair Conversion
      
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
      20 ribs done
      
      Do not archive
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of shad bell
      Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 8:12 AM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: The next future piet'er is here
      
      
      It might be a few weeks, mom probably won't want him out in the hanger for a
      little while.  Moms dont want us to ruin that new baby smell.
      
      
      Shad
      
      p.s. here is a pic of the oldest by the piet, finding all the oil spots.
      
      --- On Thu, 9/2/10, Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com> wrote:
      
      
      From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com>
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: The next future piet'er is here
      
      Shad, I know this won't be easy but how soon to you think you can get a
      picture of the little guy in your Piet? 
      
      rick
      
      On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:15 PM, kevinpurtee <kevin.purtee@us.army.mil
      <http://us.mc657.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kevin.purtee@us.army.mil> >
      wrote:
      
      <kevin.purtee@us.army.mil
      <http://us.mc657.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kevin.purtee@us.army.mil> >
      
      Shad - Congrats!  Any pictures of the new boy?
      
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Kevin Purtee
      NX899KP
      Austin/Georgetown, TX
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311136#311136
      
      
      ==========
      st" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      ==========
      http://forums.matronics.com
      ==========
      le, List Admin.
      ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      ==========
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" 
      
      
      " rel=nofollow
      target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      et=_blank>http://forums.matronics.com
      llow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      Same here, just used exterior spar varnish (2 coats) on the wood and the
      EcoBond sticks the fabric right to it without dissolving anything like
      PolyTak would. Then used the 'Bell' method with the finish coats: a
      cross-coat of exterior latex primer in the bare fabric and two cross coats
      of satin exterior latex (except I used Sherwin-Williams Superpaint) using 3"
      foam brushes (although it could easily be sprayed on as well, I test sprayed
      a couple test panels which came out very nice).
      
      rick
      
      On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> wrote:
      
      > Dad's is Ceco-bond ans Minwax spar varnish throughout.  If the glue is
      > water based I would just use spar varnish, the outdoor stuff of course.
      >
      > Shad
      >
      > --- On *Fri, 9/3/10, Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>* wrote:
      >
      >
      > From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
      > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      >
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Date: Friday, September 3, 2010, 10:08 AM
      >
      >   That is exactly my plan. (I should have been more specific.) I want to
      > use Stewart's to install the fabric, then paint with Glidden Exterior latex.
      > The Stewart's varnish is quite expensive...I was curious about a local
      > bought spar varnish or other urethane/polyurethane.
      >
      > Michael Perez
      > Karetaker Aero
      > www.karetakeraero.com
      >
      >
      > *
      >
      > " rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > et=_blank>http://forums.matronics.com
      > llow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > *
      >
      >
      > *
      >
      > *
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: The next future piet'er is here | 
      
      
      Priceless.  You need to frame that one...
      
      -----Original Message----- 
      From: shad bell 
      Sent: Sep 3, 2010 11:12 AM 
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: The next future piet'er is here 
      
      
      It might be a few weeks, mom probably won't want him out in the hanger for a little
      while.  Moms dont want us to ruin that new baby smell.
      
      Shad
      p.s. here is a pic of the oldest by the piet, finding all the oil spots.
      
      --- On Thu, 9/2/10, Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com> wrote:
      
      
      From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com>
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: The next future piet'er is here
      
      
      Shad, I know this won't be easy but how soon to you think you can get a picture
      of the little guy in your Piet? 
      
      rick
      
      
      On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:15 PM, kevinpurtee <kevin.purtee@us.army.mil> wrote:
      
      
      Shad - Congrats!  Any pictures of the new boy?
      
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Kevin Purtee
      NX899KP
      Austin/Georgetown, TX
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311136#311136
      
      
      ==========
      st" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      ==========
      http://forums.matronics.com
      ==========
      le, List Admin.
      ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      ==========
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" 
      
      
      " rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      et=_blank>http://forums.matronics.com
      llow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Official Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines | 
      
      
      Matt, I'd like to unsubscribe--Jim lagowski
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle@matronics.com>
      Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:05 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Official Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines
      
      
      >
      > Dear Listers,
      >
      > Please read over the Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines below.  The complete
      > Pietenpol-List FAQ including these Usage Guidelines can be found at the
      > following URL:
      >
      >   http://www.matronics.com/FAQs/Pietenpol-List.FAQ.html
      >
      > Thank you,
      >
      > Matt Dralle
      > Matronics Email List Administrator
      >
      >
      > ******************************************************************************
      >                     Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines
      > ******************************************************************************
      >
      > The following details the official Usage Guidelines for the 
      > Pietenpol-List.
      > You are encouraged to read it carefully, and to abide by the rules 
      > therein.
      > Failure to use the Pietenpol-List in the manner described below may result
      > in the removal of the subscribers from the List.
      >
      >
      > Pietenpol-List Policy Statement
      >
      > The purpose of the Pietenpol-List is to provide a forum of discussion for
      > things related to this particular discussion group.  The List's goals
      > are to serve as an information resource to its members; to deliver
      > high-quality content; to provide moral support; to foster camaraderie
      > among its members; and to support safe operation.  Reaching these goals
      > requires the participation and cooperation of each and every member of
      > the List.  To this end, the following guidelines have been established:
      >
      >
      > - Please keep all posts related to the List at some level.  Do not submit
      >   posts concerning computer viruses, urban legends, random humor, long
      >   lost buddies' phone numbers, etc. etc.
      >
      > - THINK carefully before you write.  Ask yourself if your post will be
      >   relevant to everyone.  If you have to wonder about that, DON'T send it.
      >
      > - Remember that your post will be included for posterity in an archive
      >   that is growing in size at an extraordinary rate.  Try to be concise and
      >   terse in your posts.  Avoid overly wordy and lengthy posts and
      >   responses.
      >
      > - Keep your signature brief.  Please include your name, email address,
      >   aircraft type/tail number, and geographic location.  A short line
      >   about where you are in the building process is also nice.  Avoid
      >   bulky signatures with character graphics; they consume unnecessary
      >   space in the archive.
      >
      > - DON'T post requests to the List for information when that info is
      >   easily obtainable from other widely available sources.  Consult the
      >   web page or FAQ first.
      >
      > - If you want to respond to a post, DO keep the "Subject:" line of
      >   your response the same as that of the original post.  This makes it
      >   easy to find threads in the archive.
      >
      > - When responding, NEVER quote the *entire* original post in your
      >   response.  DO use lines from the original post to help "tune in" the
      >   reader to the topic at hand, but be selective.  The impact that
      >   quoting the entire original post has on the size of the archive
      >   can not be overstated!
      >
      > - When the poster asks you to respond to him/her personally, DO NOT
      >   then go ahead and reply to the List.  Be aware that clicking the
      >   "reply" button on your mail package does not necessarily send your
      >   response to the original poster.  You might have to actively address
      >   your response with the original poster's email address.
      >
      > - DO NOT use the List to respond to a post unless you have something
      >   to add that is relevant and has a broad appeal.  "Way to go!", "I
      >   agree", and "Congratulations" are all responses that are better sent
      >   to the original poster directly, rather than to the List at large.
      >
      > - When responding to others' posts, avoid the feeling that you need to
      >   comment on every last point in their posts, unless you can truly
      >   contribute something valuable.
      >
      > - Feel free to disagree with other viewpoints, BUT keep your tone
      >   polite and respectful.  Don't make snide comments, personally attack
      >   other listers, or take the moral high ground on an obviously
      >   controversial issue.  This will only cause a pointless debate that
      >   will hurt feelings, waste bandwidth and resolve nothing.
      >
      > - Occasional posts by vendors or individuals who are regularly
      >   subscribed to a given List are considered acceptable.  Posts by
      >   List members promoting their respective products or items for sale
      >   should be of a friendly, informal nature, and should not resemble
      >   a typical SPAM message.  The List isn't about commercialism, but
      >   is about sharing information and knowledge.  This applies to
      >   everyone, including those who provide products to the entire
      >   community.  Informal presentation and moderation should be the
      >   operatives with respect to advertising on the Lists.
      >
      > -------
      >
      >
      > [This is an automated posting.]
      >
      > do not archive
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts | 
      
      
      Count me in too John.
      
      Don Emch
      NX899DE
      
      do not archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311239#311239
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: The next future piet'er is here | 
      
      Actually Gary, I did not grow up around airplanes.- Dad stopped flying a 
      couple years before I was born.- I always knew he was a pilot, but did no
      t even get an airplane ride untill I was about12 or 13 yrs old, in one of d
      ad's friend's Debonair.- We built and flew R/C airplanes for years.- Wh
      en I was a senior in high school I started my flying lessons.- After I go
      t my private I took Dad flying and he was hooked again.- About a year of 
      renting spam cans and he decided to build the Pietenpol.- Now at 32, and 
      now a father of 2,-I still can't believe I have a hanger and runway in my
       back yard.- I am looking forward to flying with my boys some day, and I 
      hope they share the "desease" of aviation.- My biggest fears now are that
       I am going to come home from work one day and the airplane is going to be 
      at the other- end of the runway.- I am sure they will both say "I don't
       know how it got there".
      -
      Shad=0A=0A=0A      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts | 
      
      John..
      
      One each med & lg for me, too!
      
      Al Lyscars
      Manchester, NH
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Don Emch 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 12:03 PM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts
      
      
      
        Count me in too John.
      
        Don Emch
        NX899DE
      
        do not archive
      
      
        Read this topic online here:
      
        http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311239#311239
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Question for Westcoast Piet builders and flyers | 
      
      
      Hi Mike,
      
      Here goes from my memory,
      
      I (Scott Liefeld) base mine at Fox Field.  Next to Edwards AFB.  You should know
      where that is since you work for NASA.
      
      Joanne Painter has a flying Piet with a A-80 and is at Mojave Airport.
      
      My dad (Sparky Sparks) is based at Gillespie Field in San Diego. GN-1.
      
      John Kerr is based at Gillespie Field in San Diego. GN-1.
      
      There is a flying one at Brown Field in San Diego.
      
      There is a Flying GN-1 Lycoming powered at Lake Wolford near San Diego.
      
      Mike Madrid is at Lompoc just north of Santa Barbra.
      
      We have a non-flying Piet in the Muesum at Fox Field.
      
      French Valley EAA chapter has the Project you saw at Brodhead.
      
      Dan Rienhert has a Piet project nearly complete at Cable airport that is for sale.
      With a model B,  See barnstormers.  Jay Cotting's old project.
      
      Tom Lawthers has a project.  He is a tower controller at Fox Field.
      
      EAA chapter 1 at Flabob has a project.  
      
      Now my brain hurts.  There could be 1 or 2 more I don't remember at the moment.
      
      --------
      Scott Liefeld
      Flying N11MS since March 1972
      Steel Tube
      C-85-12
      Wire Wheels
      Broadhead in 1996
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311245#311245
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      Lookin' mighty nice, Rick! Don't know how you can stand that view, though..
      
      
      Gary Boothe
      
      Cool, CA
      
      Pietenpol
      
      WW Corvair Conversion
      
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
      20 ribs done
      
      Do not archive
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Holland
      Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 8:48 AM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      
      
      Same here, just used exterior spar varnish (2 coats) on the wood and the
      EcoBond sticks the fabric right to it without dissolving anything like
      PolyTak would. Then used the 'Bell' method with the finish coats: a
      cross-coat of exterior latex primer in the bare fabric and two cross coats
      of satin exterior latex (except I used Sherwin-Williams Superpaint) using 3"
      foam brushes (although it could easily be sprayed on as well, I test sprayed
      a couple test panels which came out very nice).
      
      rick
      
      On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM, shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com> wrote:
      
      
      Dad's is Ceco-bond ans Minwax spar varnish throughout.  If the glue is water
      based I would just use spar varnish, the outdoor stuff of course.
      
      
      Shad
      
      --- On Fri, 9/3/10, Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
      
      
      From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      
      
      
      
      
      That is exactly my plan. (I should have been more specific.) I want to use
      Stewart's to install the fabric, then paint with Glidden Exterior latex. The
      Stewart's varnish is quite expensive...I was curious about a local bought
      spar varnish or other urethane/polyurethane.
      
      Michael Perez
      Karetaker Aero
      www.karetakeraero.com
      
      
      " rel=nofollow
      target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      et=_blank>http://forums.matronics.com
      llow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
      " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      tp://forums.matronics.com
      _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" 
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      
      Just a quick note about my experience with Spar Varnish,  After flying mine for
      28 years I rebuilt it.  I found that I had a very small gas leak in my fuel tank
      that is in my center section.  The gas penetrated the spar varnish and I had
      to replace about 80% of my center section.  When I rebuilt it I used epoxy
      varnish from Poly Fiber.  I hope it doesn't happen again.
      
      --------
      Scott Liefeld
      Flying N11MS since March 1972
      Steel Tube
      C-85-12
      Wire Wheels
      Broadhead in 1996
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311248#311248
      
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Official Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines | 
      
      You have to remove yourself, just like you had to add yourself....
      Ryan
      
      do not archive
      
      On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Lagowski Morrow <jimdeb@charter.net> wrote:
      
      > jimdeb@charter.net>
      >
      > Matt, I'd like to unsubscribe--Jim lagowski
      >
      > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle@matronics.com>
      > To: <dralle@matronics.com>
      > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:05 AM
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Official Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines
      >
      >
      >>
      >> Dear Listers,
      >>
      >> Please read over the Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines below.  The complete
      >> Pietenpol-List FAQ including these Usage Guidelines can be found at the
      >> following URL:
      >>
      >>  http://www.matronics.com/FAQs/Pietenpol-List.FAQ.html
      >>
      >> Thank you,
      >>
      >> Matt Dralle
      >> Matronics Email List Administrator
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> ******************************************************************************
      >>                    Pietenpol-List Usage Guidelines
      >>
      >> ******************************************************************************
      >>
      >> The following details the official Usage Guidelines for the
      >> Pietenpol-List.
      >> You are encouraged to read it carefully, and to abide by the rules
      >> therein.
      >> Failure to use the Pietenpol-List in the manner described below may result
      >> in the removal of the subscribers from the List.
      >>
      >>
      >> Pietenpol-List Policy Statement
      >>
      >> The purpose of the Pietenpol-List is to provide a forum of discussion for
      >> things related to this particular discussion group.  The List's goals
      >> are to serve as an information resource to its members; to deliver
      >> high-quality content; to provide moral support; to foster camaraderie
      >> among its members; and to support safe operation.  Reaching these goals
      >> requires the participation and cooperation of each and every member of
      >> the List.  To this end, the following guidelines have been established:
      >>
      >>
      >> - Please keep all posts related to the List at some level.  Do not submit
      >>  posts concerning computer viruses, urban legends, random humor, long
      >>  lost buddies' phone numbers, etc. etc.
      >>
      >> - THINK carefully before you write.  Ask yourself if your post will be
      >>  relevant to everyone.  If you have to wonder about that, DON'T send it.
      >>
      >> - Remember that your post will be included for posterity in an archive
      >>  that is growing in size at an extraordinary rate.  Try to be concise and
      >>  terse in your posts.  Avoid overly wordy and lengthy posts and
      >>  responses.
      >>
      >> - Keep your signature brief.  Please include your name, email address,
      >>  aircraft type/tail number, and geographic location.  A short line
      >>  about where you are in the building process is also nice.  Avoid
      >>  bulky signatures with character graphics; they consume unnecessary
      >>  space in the archive.
      >>
      >> - DON'T post requests to the List for information when that info is
      >>  easily obtainable from other widely available sources.  Consult the
      >>  web page or FAQ first.
      >>
      >> - If you want to respond to a post, DO keep the "Subject:" line of
      >>  your response the same as that of the original post.  This makes it
      >>  easy to find threads in the archive.
      >>
      >> - When responding, NEVER quote the *entire* original post in your
      >>  response.  DO use lines from the original post to help "tune in" the
      >>  reader to the topic at hand, but be selective.  The impact that
      >>  quoting the entire original post has on the size of the archive
      >>  can not be overstated!
      >>
      >> - When the poster asks you to respond to him/her personally, DO NOT
      >>  then go ahead and reply to the List.  Be aware that clicking the
      >>  "reply" button on your mail package does not necessarily send your
      >>  response to the original poster.  You might have to actively address
      >>  your response with the original poster's email address.
      >>
      >> - DO NOT use the List to respond to a post unless you have something
      >>  to add that is relevant and has a broad appeal.  "Way to go!", "I
      >>  agree", and "Congratulations" are all responses that are better sent
      >>  to the original poster directly, rather than to the List at large.
      >>
      >> - When responding to others' posts, avoid the feeling that you need to
      >>  comment on every last point in their posts, unless you can truly
      >>  contribute something valuable.
      >>
      >> - Feel free to disagree with other viewpoints, BUT keep your tone
      >>  polite and respectful.  Don't make snide comments, personally attack
      >>  other listers, or take the moral high ground on an obviously
      >>  controversial issue.  This will only cause a pointless debate that
      >>  will hurt feelings, waste bandwidth and resolve nothing.
      >>
      >> - Occasional posts by vendors or individuals who are regularly
      >>  subscribed to a given List are considered acceptable.  Posts by
      >>  List members promoting their respective products or items for sale
      >>  should be of a friendly, informal nature, and should not resemble
      >>  a typical SPAM message.  The List isn't about commercialism, but
      >>  is about sharing information and knowledge.  This applies to
      >>  everyone, including those who provide products to the entire
      >>  community.  Informal presentation and moderation should be the
      >>  operatives with respect to advertising on the Lists.
      >>
      >> -------
      >>
      >>
      >> [This is an automated posting.]
      >>
      >> do not archive
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >
      >
      
Message 23
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts | 
      
      
      Before the whole List gets filled with everyone placing their T-Shirt orders, thought
      it might be a good time to mention that John usually just makes the T-Shirts
      available through Caf Press, rather than taking orders. (At least that's
      how his other great designs have been offered). So, it's probably best to just
      wait till John says the design is available, and then place your orders through
      the website. (Unless things are different for this design).
      
      Of course, seeing all these requests for shirts is probably a good motivator for
      John to get it done sooner.
      
      Bill C.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311254#311254
      
      
Message 24
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts | 
      
      
      You're absolutely right, Bill!!
      
      I'll take two...
      
      Gary Boothe
      Cool, CA
      Pietenpol
      WW Corvair Conversion
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      20 ribs done
      Do not archive
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Church
      Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:15 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts
      
      
      Before the whole List gets filled with everyone placing their T-Shirt
      orders, thought it might be a good time to mention that John usually just
      makes the T-Shirts available through Caf Press, rather than taking orders.
      (At least that's how his other great designs have been offered). So, it's
      probably best to just wait till John says the design is available, and then
      place your orders through the website. (Unless things are different for this
      design).
      
      Of course, seeing all these requests for shirts is probably a good motivator
      for John to get it done sooner.
      
      Bill C.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311254#311254
      
      
Message 25
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Lee Bottom Fly-In | 
      
      
      Anybody who does not come back smiling from a flight in a Piet obviously has something
      very wrong with them!
      
       :D
      
      --------
      Billy McCaskill
      Urbana, IL
      tail section almost done, starting on ribs soon
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311258#311258
      
      
Message 26
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts | 
      
      Great point Bill. Spot on....
      
      I'll take two.
      
      Jess will want at least one...maybe two.    ;)
      
      Ryan
      
      do NOT archive
      
      On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Gary Boothe <gboothe5@comcast.net> wrote:
      
      >
      >
      > You're absolutely right, Bill!!
      >
      > I'll take two...
      >
      > Gary Boothe
      > Cool, CA
      > Pietenpol
      > WW Corvair Conversion
      > Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      > 20 ribs done
      > Do not archive
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill
      > Church
      > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:15 AM
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts
      >
      > billspiet@sympatico.ca>
      >
      > Before the whole List gets filled with everyone placing their T-Shirt
      > orders, thought it might be a good time to mention that John usually just
      > makes the T-Shirts available through Caf=E9 Press, rather than taking ord
      ers.
      > (At least that's how his other great designs have been offered). So, it's
      > probably best to just wait till John says the design is available, and th
      en
      > place your orders through the website. (Unless things are different for
      > this
      > design).
      >
      > Of course, seeing all these requests for shirts is probably a good
      > motivator
      > for John to get it done sooner.
      >
      > Bill C.
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311254#311254
      >
      >
      ===========
      ===========
      ===========
      ===========
      >
      >
      
Message 27
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
        Stewart system doesn't use any volatile solvents, so you can just use 
      spar varnish.  You can use any quality brand.  Do yourself and buy it by 
      the gallon.  I used 3 quarts just doing my wing.  As someone else 
      mentioned, it also works well with Latex paint.  Watch the youtube 
      videos for an idea how it works.  It is basically like a heat activated 
      contact cement with no odor.  I did my covering with bare hands, no 
      respirator, in a closed up shop.  It is heat activated, so you can work 
      it as slow or fast as you want, while shrinking your fabric around 
      compound curves, like wing tips and elevator edges.  I've used the 
      Randolph systems in their covering seminars at Osh and Sun-n-fun, and 
      would use Stewart Eco-bond again in a heartbeat.
      
      Ben Charvet
      Mims, Fl
      Took mom (76 years old) for her first Pietenpol ride today
      
      
      On 9/3/2010 7:37 AM, Michael Perez wrote:
      > You guys using the Stewart's System, did you use their varnish for the 
      > bare wood prior to covering, if not, what brand/type varnish did you use?
      >
      > Michael Perez
      > Karetaker Aero
      > www.karetakeraero.com
      >
      > --- On *Fri, 9/3/10, Dave Sornborger /<dsornbor@aol.com>/* wrote:
      >
      >
      >     From: Dave Sornborger <dsornbor@aol.com>
      >     Subject: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      >     To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      >     Date: Friday, September 3, 2010, 7:16 AM
      >
      >     Thanks Guys,Looks like Stewart is the way to go.Not much into the
      >     toxicity levels of the others,not to mention the KaBoom! factor.
      >        Thanks again.Dave
      >
      >     *http://www.matronil="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://forums.matronics.com">http:=======================
      >
      >     *
      >
      > *
      >
      >
      > *
      
      
Message 28
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts | 
      
      
      Glad you guys agree.
      
      Oh, yeah, I'll take a Large.
      
      Bill C.
      
      do not archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311270#311270
      
      
Message 29
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts | 
      
      
      You're a good sport!
      
      Gary Boothe
      Cool, CA
      Pietenpol
      WW Corvair Conversion
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      20 ribs done
      Do not archive
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Church
      Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 11:11 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Pietenpol airlines shirts
      
      
      Glad you guys agree.
      
      Oh, yeah, I'll take a Large.
      
      Bill C.
      
      do not archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311270#311270
      
      
Message 30
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thanks for the 	 input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      Ben:
      
      Good on you, mate!  How did you get a 76 year old folded up enough to get 
      into the front 'pit?
      
      Tom Stinemetze
      McPherson, KS.
      
      
      >>> Ben Charvet <bencharvet@gmail.com> 9/3/2010 1:03 PM >>>
      Ben Charvet
      Mims, Fl
      Took mom (76 years old) for her first Pietenpol ride today
      
Message 31
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Thanks for the 	 input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      Getting her in is fairly easy.  Getting her out is another matter.
      
      Please dO nOt arcHive
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      NX899JP
      
      Raleigh, NC
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of TOM
      STINEMETZE
      Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 2:23 PM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      
      
      Ben:
      
      
      Good on you, mate!  How did you get a 76 year old folded up enough to get
      into the front 'pit?
      
      
      Tom Stinemetze
      
      McPherson, KS.
      
      
      >>> Ben Charvet <bencharvet@gmail.com> 9/3/2010 1:03 PM >>>
      Ben Charvet
      Mims, Fl
      Took mom (76 years old) for her first Pietenpol ride today
      
      
Message 32
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: 40 hour fly-off, state of model A | 
      
      
      Perhaps Im thick or something but is there something different in those prints
      that would make a plane built from them a more beautiful flying airplane?  Since
      he was referring to flying Allen Rudolph's old Piet and said, if I were to
      build another Piet I'd do my best to replicate THAT one, I assume there was something
      he noted about THAT airplane.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311276#311276
      
      
Message 33
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: 40 hour fly-off, state of model A | 
      
      Well, it was a bit of a sarcastic reply. The Allen Rudolf Piet is pretty
      well built to the plans. Technically, I should have taken a picture of the
      F&G Manual, because I believe it was supposed to have been constructed from
      that version of the plans back in the early '30s.
      
      The point is that if you want to have a beautiful flying airplane, what's
      contained in those prints will get you just that.  :)
      
      Ryan
      
      On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, BYD <billsayre@ymail.com> wrote:
      
      >
      > Perhaps I=92m thick or something but is there something different in thos
      e
      > prints that would make a plane built from them a more beautiful flying
      > airplane?  Since he was referring to flying Allen Rudolph's old Piet and
      > said, =93if I were to build another Piet I'd do my best to replicate THAT
      > one=94, I assume there was something he noted about THAT airplane.
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311276#311276
      >
      >
      ===========
      ===========
      ===========
      ===========
      >
      >
      
Message 34
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: 40 hour fly-off, state of model A | 
      
      
      Ryan,
      
      I certainly won't argue with that, and I wondered if he might have meant that,
      but I also wondered if there might have been details he noticed when flying it
      that became obvious during operation.  I have only flown in an original but not
      at the controls.
      
      Bill
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311287#311287
      
      
Message 35
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Started my rib jig today | 
      
      
      Used a pneumatic headless pinner for the blocks so it went together fairly quickly.
      I'm fairly sure I'm going to staple the gussets instead of just clamping
      so I can try to bang the ribs out fairly quickly. 
      Attached are some photos - does everything look correct? 
      I'm open to any suggestions from you guys on how to improve the jig and the rib
      building process. Thanks.
      Jamie
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311293#311293
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib2_121.jpg
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib4_439.jpg
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib1_173.jpg
      
      
Message 36
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Started my rib jig today | 
      
      Jamie:
      
      Looks good to me and very close to how I did mine.  Note that the two spar 
      spacers you have will be very easy to glue to your ribs unless your put 
      something between the spar spacer and the sticks to be glued.  I tried 
      small pieces of waxed paper which worked OK but had to be replaced each 
      time as they would rip when you pulled the glued up spar out of the jig 
      (after the glue cured of course.)  I found that coating the spar spacer at 
      the joints with a light coat of Vaseline kept the glue from sticking and 
      made removal from the jig a lot simpler.  Your milage may vary.
      
      Tom Stinemetze
      McPherson, KS.
      
      
      >>> "JGriff" <jgriffith19@comcast.net> 9/3/2010 4:33 PM >>>
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib1_173.jpg
      
Message 37
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Tailbrace wire idea | 
      
      
      Saw a plane at a fly-in a couple of weeks ago that used a different idea for the
      tailbrace wires. The plane was a Rans S-6, and I noticed that the tailbrace
      wires did not have any turnbuckles. The method used to avoid turnbuckles was to
      put a pattern of staggered holes in the small brackets attached to the cables
      that get screwed to the tailplanes. If the cable isn't snug enough, move to
      the next hole.
      Well, my description probably has you scratching your head as to what I'm trying
      to explain, so here's a picture:
      
      Personally, I think I prefer the traditional turnbuckles, but this method is a
      lightweight alternative that has some merit.
      
      Bill C.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311298#311298
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/tailbrace_104.jpg
      
      
Message 38
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Started my rib jig today | 
      
      
      Jamie its looking=C2- good; get building ribs. 
      
      Cheers, 
      
      Jim B. 
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "JGriff" <jgriffith19@comcast.net> 
      Sent: Friday, September 3, 2010 2:33:53 PM 
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Started my rib jig today 
      
      
      Used a pneumatic headless pinner for the blocks so it went together fairly 
      quickly. I'm fairly sure I'm going to staple the gussets instead of just cl
      amping so I can try to bang the ribs out fairly quickly. 
      Attached are some photos - does everything look correct? 
      I'm open to any suggestions from you guys on how to improve the jig and the
       rib building process. Thanks. 
      Jamie 
      
      
      Read this topic online here: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311293#311293 
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib2_121.jpg 
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib4_439.jpg 
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib1_173.jpg 
      
      
      =========== 
      
      =========== 
      MS - 
      =========== 
      e - 
       =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2--Matt Dralle, List Admin. 
      =========== 
      
      
Message 39
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Started my rib jig today | 
      
      
      My two cents...  If I were building a new rib jig today I think it would be the
      612 rib.  I would also drill two holes in both vertical upright braces that are
      next to the wing spars.  Instead of nailing the ribs to the spar through the
      top capstrip as shown in the plans, many builders nail the uprights to the spar.
      I used a picture frame nailer to squeeze the nails into the spar.  
      
      Hope you enjoy building your ribs.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311304#311304
      
      
Message 40
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Started my rib jig today | 
      
      
      My two cents...  If I were building a new rib jig today I think it would be the
      612 rib.  I would also drill two holes in both vertical upright braces that are
      next to the wing spars.  Instead of nailing the ribs to the spar through the
      top capstrip as shown in the plans, many builders nail the uprights to the spar.
      I used a picture frame nailer to squeeze the nails into the spar.  
      
      Hope you enjoy building your ribs.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311305#311305
      
      
Message 41
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Tailbrace wire idea | 
      
      
      I wondered how I was going to explain away all those mis-aligned holes in my
      brackets....
      
      Gary Boothe
      Cool, CA
      Pietenpol
      WW Corvair Conversion
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      20 ribs done
      Do not archive
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Church
      Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 3:20 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Tailbrace wire idea
      
      
      Saw a plane at a fly-in a couple of weeks ago that used a different idea for
      the tailbrace wires. The plane was a Rans S-6, and I noticed that the
      tailbrace wires did not have any turnbuckles. The method used to avoid
      turnbuckles was to put a pattern of staggered holes in the small brackets
      attached to the cables that get screwed to the tailplanes. If the cable
      isn't snug enough, move to the next hole.
      Well, my description probably has you scratching your head as to what I'm
      trying to explain, so here's a picture:
      
      Personally, I think I prefer the traditional turnbuckles, but this method is
      a lightweight alternative that has some merit.
      
      Bill C.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311298#311298
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/tailbrace_104.jpg
      
      
Message 42
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart | 
      
      
      Mike,
      
      I am not aware that they sell varnish, but I used two-part epoxy varnish
       which is bulletpoof (but expensive). If I were you I would call Dan Stewa
      rt and ask him. The Stewart's are very good about calling you back with ad
      vice. 
      
      Dan Helsper
      Poplar Grove, IL.
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net>
      Sent: Fri, Sep 3, 2010 6:37 am
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      
      
      You guys using the Stewart's System, did you use their varnish for the bar
      e wood prior to covering, if not, what brand/type varnish did you use?
      
      Michael Perez
      Karetaker Aero
      www.karetakeraero.com
      
      --- On Fri, 9/3/10, Dave Sornborger <dsornbor@aol.com> wrote:
      
      
      From: Dave Sornborger <dsornbor@aol.com>
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Thanks for the input-stits-ceconite-stewart
      
      
      Thanks Guys,Looks like Stewart is the way to go.Not much into the toxicity
       levels of the others,not to mention the KaBoom! factor.
         Thanks again.Dave
      http://www.matronil="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://forums.m
      atronics.com">http:==================
      =====
      
      
      ========================
      ===========
      -=          - The Pietenpol-List Email Forum -
      -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse
      -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription,
      -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,
      -= Photoshare, and much much more:
      -
      -=   --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      -
      -========================
      ========================
      ===========
      -=               - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
      -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums!
      -
      -=   --> http://forums.matronics.com
      -
      -========================
      ========================
      ===========
      -=             - List Contribution Web Site -
      -=  Thank you for your generous support!
      -=                              -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
      -=   --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      -========================
      ========================
      ===========
      
      
Message 43
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Tailbrace wire idea | 
      
      
      
      This is a generally great idea to save weight, money, and some rigging.  
      
      However, those multiple choice" cross-drilled holes are way too close together.
      As I understand it, we are supposed to have 2 times the diameter of the hole,
      from the center of the hole, to the edge of the material or to another such
      hole.  Our BP drawings do not always provide that, either re edges, but these
      holes shown are very tight to each other. 
      Tim in central TX 
      
      -----Original Message-----
      >From: Bill Church <billspiet@sympatico.ca>
      >Sent: Sep 3, 2010 5:20 PM
      >To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Tailbrace wire idea
      >
      >
      >Saw a plane at a fly-in a couple of weeks ago that used a different idea for the
      tailbrace wires. The plane was a Rans S-6, and I noticed that the tailbrace
      wires did not have any turnbuckles. The method used to avoid turnbuckles was
      to put a pattern of staggered holes in the small brackets attached to the cables
      that get screwed to the tailplanes. If the cable isn't snug enough, move to
      the next hole.
      >Well, my description probably has you scratching your head as to what I'm trying
      to explain, so here's a picture:
      >
      >Personally, I think I prefer the traditional turnbuckles, but this method is a
      lightweight alternative that has some merit.
      >
      >Bill C.
      >
      >
      >Read this topic online here:
      >
      >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311298#311298
      >
      >
      >Attachments: 
      >
      >http://forums.matronics.com//files/tailbrace_104.jpg
      >
      ><clip>
      
      
Message 44
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Started my rib jig today | 
      
      Good work Jamie, the only thing I did different was add round cams cut from
      1" dowels when several of you outside blocks are, made it easier to insert
      and remove parts (and finished ribs). The dowels are drilled off center and
      held down with short desk screws.
      
      rick
      
      On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:33 PM, JGriff <jgriffith19@comcast.net> wrote:
      
      >
      > Used a pneumatic headless pinner for the blocks so it went together fairly
      > quickly. I'm fairly sure I'm going to staple the gussets instead of just
      > clamping so I can try to bang the ribs out fairly quickly.
      > Attached are some photos - does everything look correct?
      > I'm open to any suggestions from you guys on how to improve the jig and the
      > rib building process. Thanks.
      > Jamie
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311293#311293
      >
      >
      > Attachments:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib2_121.jpg
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib4_439.jpg
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib1_173.jpg
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"
      
Message 45
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Started my rib jig today | 
      
      
        To keep from gluing my rib to my jig, I used pieces of plastic grocery 
      bag, about a 2"x2" square under each joint.  After removing the rib from 
      the jig the next day, the plastic will peel right off.  I'm not sure it 
      would be a great idea to pull the rib out of the jig before the glue is 
      cured if that's what you meant by "bang the ribs out fairly quickly"  I 
      did my ribs one day at a time, and it took over a month.  It is a good 
      way to see if you have the stamina to finish the project though.  I made 
      a few practice ribs using cheap lumber, and they are still in use as 
      wall decorations.  Have fun and enjoy the journey!
      
      Ben Charvet
      Mims, Fl
      On 9/3/2010 5:33 PM, JGriff wrote:
      > -->  Pietenpol-List message posted by: "JGriff"<jgriffith19@comcast.net>
      >
      > Used a pneumatic headless pinner for the blocks so it went together fairly quickly.
      I'm fairly sure I'm going to staple the gussets instead of just clamping
      so I can try to bang the ribs out fairly quickly.
      > Attached are some photos - does everything look correct?
      > I'm open to any suggestions from you guys on how to improve the jig and the rib
      building process. Thanks.
      > Jamie
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=311293#311293
      >
      >
      > Attachments:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib2_121.jpg
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib4_439.jpg
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/rib1_173.jpg
      >
      >
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |