Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Sun 12/12/10


Total Messages Posted: 8



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:45 AM - Re: Push-pull control rod (johnwoods@westnet.com.au)
     2. 02:26 AM - Re: Push-pull control rod (Peter W Johnson)
     3. 04:34 PM - Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... (Chris Rusch)
     4. 04:46 PM - Re: Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... (Rick Holland)
     5. 04:57 PM - Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... (Chris Rusch)
     6. 06:35 PM - Re: Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... (Jeff Boatright)
     7. 08:09 PM - Another Piet back in the air (Greg Cardinal)
     8. 08:28 PM - Re: Another Piet back in the air (Jim Markle)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:45:39 AM PST US
    From: johnwoods@westnet.com.au
    Subject: Re: Push-pull control rod
    Peter, In the photo of the push rod attached to the bell crank, which of the three holes gave you the best fore/aft stick movement for elevator control? Also are the bell crank holes for the elevator cables the same distance apart as the elevator control horn holes? This would alleviation the slack cable syndrome reported by many. The same would hold true of the rudder cables. Simple geometry. JohnW Perth West Aust ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter W Johnson" <vk3eka@bigpond.net.au> Sent: Sunday, 12 December, 2010 8:09:01 AM GMT +08:00 Beijing / Chongqing / Hong Kong / Urumqi Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod I have some pictures on my web site of the control tubes etc. Have a look at http://www.cpc-world.com/main.php?insert_file=photos103.php . The only thing I did notice was that the rod ends on the tube under the rear seat did not allow full stick side by side movement with out undoing the rod end a fraction of a turn. There were plenty of threads left and there was no way it was going to fall out so I left it as is. Not problems in use. I think I used 1/2 inch tubing if I remember correctly. Cheers Peter Wonthaggi Australia http://www.cpc-world.com From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of KM Heide CPO/FAAOP Sent: Sunday, 12 December 2010 5:25 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod Fellow pieters: Any members have photos thay can share on the push-pull rods. I am looking for control stick connections, behind the seat set-up and bell crank connection. Any assistance in the size, material, and parts used for this set-up is much appreicated. KMHeide Hawley, MN


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:26:21 AM PST US
    From: "Peter W Johnson" <vk3eka@bigpond.net.au>
    Subject: Push-pull control rod
    John, I left the push rod in the hole shown. The stick was right in the gut on landing (except when I fluffed it!!!) and felt fine in general flying. The bell crank holes were as plans. Cheers Peter From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of johnwoods@westnet.com.au Sent: Sunday, 12 December 2010 8:43 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod Peter, In the photo of the push rod attached to the bell crank, which of the three holes gave you the best fore/aft stick movement for elevator control? Also are the bell crank holes for the elevator cables the same distance apart as the elevator control horn holes? This would alleviation the slack cable syndrome reported by many. The same would hold true of the rudder cables. Simple geometry. JohnW Perth West Aust ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter W Johnson" <vk3eka@bigpond.net.au> Sent: Sunday, 12 December, 2010 8:09:01 AM GMT +08:00 Beijing / Chongqing / Hong Kong / Urumqi Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod I have some pictures on my web site of the control tubes etc. Have a look at http://www.cpc-world.com/main.php?insert_file=photos103.php. The only thing I did notice was that the rod ends on the tube under the rear seat did not allow full stick side by side movement with out undoing the rod end a fraction of a turn. There were plenty of threads left and there was no way it was going to fall out so I left it as is. Not problems in use. I think I used 1/2 inch tubing if I remember correctly. Cheers Peter Wonthaggi Australia http://www.cpc-world.com <http://www.cpc-world.com/> From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of KM Heide CPO/FAAOP Sent: Sunday, 12 December 2010 5:25 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod Fellow pieters: Any members have photos thay can share on the push-pull rods. I am looking for control stick connections, behind the seat set-up and bell crank connection. Any assistance in the size, material, and parts used for this set-up is much appreicated. KMHeide Hawley, MN www.aeroelectric.com www.buildersbooks.com www.homebuilthelp.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com _blank">www.aeroelectric.com " target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com ="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:34:34 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed...
    From: "Chris Rusch" <rmdinfo@lakefield.net>
    All done on the Dyno, the results are posted below as well as another video link of run #8. we installed and electronic ignition on these last runs and it made a huge difference on how smooth the engine is now. it starts and idles smooth as glass now, and gained a few more hp. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLOP01rFf_k DYNO RESULTS 12-11-10 ADDED ELECTROMOTIVE ELECTRONIC IGNITION RPM LBFT HP 2000 132.8 50.6 2100 143.8 57.5 2200 150.3 63.0 2300 154.8 67.8 2400 157.4 71.9 2500 158.9 75.6 2600 158.9 78.7 2700 159.3 81.9 2800 159.0 84.8 2900 158.3 87.4 3000 157.1 89.7 3100 155.2 91.6 2550 153.8 75.0 AVERAGE Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=323113#323113


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:46:48 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed...
    From: Rick Holland <at7000ft@gmail.com>
    Looks good Chris, what does it weigh? rick On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Chris Rusch <rmdinfo@lakefield.net> wrote: > > > > All done on the Dyno, the results are posted below as well as another video > link of run #8. we installed and electronic ignition on these last runs and > it made a huge difference on how smooth the engine is now. it starts and > idles smooth as glass now, and gained a few more hp. > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLOP01rFf_k > > > DYNO RESULTS > 12-11-10 > ADDED ELECTROMOTIVE ELECTRONIC IGNITION > > RPM LBFT HP > > 2000 132.8 50.6 > 2100 143.8 57.5 > 2200 150.3 63.0 > 2300 154.8 67.8 > 2400 157.4 71.9 > 2500 158.9 75.6 > 2600 158.9 78.7 > 2700 159.3 81.9 > 2800 159.0 84.8 > 2900 158.3 87.4 > 3000 157.1 89.7 > 3100 155.2 91.6 > > > 2550 153.8 75.0 AVERAGE > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=323113#323113 > > -- Rick Holland Castle Rock, Colorado "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:57:46 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed...
    From: "Chris Rusch" <rmdinfo@lakefield.net>
    247, almost identical to the model A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=323116#323116 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1235_172.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1236_431.jpg


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:35:21 PM PST US
    From: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>
    Subject: Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed...
    Can it be run inverted? > >247, almost identical to the model A > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=323116#323116 > > >Attachments: > >http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1235_172.jpg >http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1236_431.jpg > -- --- Jeffrey H. Boatright, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Ophthalmology Emory University School of Medicine Editor-in-Chief Molecular Vision


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:09:22 PM PST US
    From: "Greg Cardinal" <gcardinal@comcast.net>
    Subject: Another Piet back in the air
    Lowell Durham of Milaca, Mn built and flew this Pietenpol a number of years ago. It sat in a barn for 9 years until purchased earlier this year by Bob Poore. Bob got it back in flying condition as you can see in the attached picture. Will we see it a Brodhead this year Bob? Greg C.


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:28:21 PM PST US
    From: Jim Markle <jim_markle@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Another Piet back in the air
    That's a great picture. And congrats to Bob! jm -----Original Message----- From: Greg Cardinal Sent: Dec 12, 2010 8:07 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Another Piet back in the air Lowell Durham of Milaca, Mn built and flew this Pietenpol a number of years ago. It sat in a barn for 9 years until purchased earlier this year by Bob Poore. Bob got it back in flying condition as you can see in the attached picture. Will we see it a Brodhead this year Bob? Greg C.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --