Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:45 AM - Re: Push-pull control rod (johnwoods@westnet.com.au)
2. 02:26 AM - Re: Push-pull control rod (Peter W Johnson)
3. 04:34 PM - Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... (Chris Rusch)
4. 04:46 PM - Re: Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... (Rick Holland)
5. 04:57 PM - Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... (Chris Rusch)
6. 06:35 PM - Re: Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... (Jeff Boatright)
7. 08:09 PM - Another Piet back in the air (Greg Cardinal)
8. 08:28 PM - Re: Another Piet back in the air (Jim Markle)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Push-pull control rod |
Peter,
In the photo of the push rod attached to the bell crank, which of the three holes
gave you the best fore/aft stick movement for elevator control?
Also are the bell crank holes for the elevator cables the same distance apart as
the elevator control horn holes?
This would alleviation the slack cable syndrome reported by many.
The same would hold true of the rudder cables. Simple geometry.
JohnW
Perth West Aust
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter W Johnson" <vk3eka@bigpond.net.au>
Sent: Sunday, 12 December, 2010 8:09:01 AM GMT +08:00 Beijing / Chongqing / Hong
Kong / Urumqi
Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod
I have some pictures on my web site of the control tubes etc.
Have a look at http://www.cpc-world.com/main.php?insert_file=photos103.php .
The only thing I did notice was that the rod ends on the tube under the rear seat
did not allow full stick side by side movement with out undoing the rod end
a fraction of a turn.
There were plenty of threads left and there was no way it was going to fall out
so I left it as is. Not problems in use.
I think I used 1/2 inch tubing if I remember correctly.
Cheers
Peter
Wonthaggi Australia
http://www.cpc-world.com
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of KM Heide CPO/FAAOP
Sent: Sunday, 12 December 2010 5:25 AM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod
Fellow pieters:
Any members have photos thay can share on the push-pull rods. I am looking for
control stick connections, behind the seat set-up and bell crank connection. Any
assistance in the size, material, and parts used for this set-up is much appreicated.
KMHeide
Hawley, MN
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Push-pull control rod |
John,
I left the push rod in the hole shown. The stick was right in the gut on
landing (except when I fluffed it!!!) and felt fine in general flying.
The bell crank holes were as plans.
Cheers
Peter
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
johnwoods@westnet.com.au
Sent: Sunday, 12 December 2010 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod
Peter,
In the photo of the push rod attached to the bell crank, which of the
three holes gave you the best fore/aft stick movement for elevator
control?
Also are the bell crank holes for the elevator cables the same distance
apart as the elevator control horn holes?
This would alleviation the slack cable syndrome reported by many.
The same would hold true of the rudder cables. Simple geometry.
JohnW
Perth West Aust
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter W Johnson" <vk3eka@bigpond.net.au>
Sent: Sunday, 12 December, 2010 8:09:01 AM GMT +08:00 Beijing /
Chongqing / Hong Kong / Urumqi
Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod
I have some pictures on my web site of the control tubes etc.
Have a look at
http://www.cpc-world.com/main.php?insert_file=photos103.php.
The only thing I did notice was that the rod ends on the tube under the
rear seat did not allow full stick side by side movement with out
undoing the rod end a fraction of a turn.
There were plenty of threads left and there was no way it was going to
fall out so I left it as is. Not problems in use.
I think I used 1/2 inch tubing if I remember correctly.
Cheers
Peter
Wonthaggi Australia
http://www.cpc-world.com <http://www.cpc-world.com/>
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of KM Heide
CPO/FAAOP
Sent: Sunday, 12 December 2010 5:25 AM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Push-pull control rod
Fellow pieters:
Any members have photos thay can share on the push-pull rods. I am
looking for control stick connections, behind the seat set-up and bell
crank connection. Any assistance in the size, material, and parts used
for this set-up is much appreicated.
KMHeide
Hawley, MN
www.aeroelectric.com
www.buildersbooks.com
www.homebuilthelp.com
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
http://forums.matronics.com
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... |
All done on the Dyno, the results are posted below as well as another video link
of run #8. we installed and electronic ignition on these last runs and it made
a huge difference on how smooth the engine is now. it starts and idles smooth
as glass now, and gained a few more hp.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLOP01rFf_k
DYNO RESULTS
12-11-10
ADDED ELECTROMOTIVE ELECTRONIC IGNITION
RPM LBFT HP
2000 132.8 50.6
2100 143.8 57.5
2200 150.3 63.0
2300 154.8 67.8
2400 157.4 71.9
2500 158.9 75.6
2600 158.9 78.7
2700 159.3 81.9
2800 159.0 84.8
2900 158.3 87.4
3000 157.1 89.7
3100 155.2 91.6
2550 153.8 75.0 AVERAGE
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=323113#323113
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... |
Looks good Chris, what does it weigh?
rick
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Chris Rusch <rmdinfo@lakefield.net> wrote:
> >
>
> All done on the Dyno, the results are posted below as well as another video
> link of run #8. we installed and electronic ignition on these last runs and
> it made a huge difference on how smooth the engine is now. it starts and
> idles smooth as glass now, and gained a few more hp.
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLOP01rFf_k
>
>
> DYNO RESULTS
> 12-11-10
> ADDED ELECTROMOTIVE ELECTRONIC IGNITION
>
> RPM LBFT HP
>
> 2000 132.8 50.6
> 2100 143.8 57.5
> 2200 150.3 63.0
> 2300 154.8 67.8
> 2400 157.4 71.9
> 2500 158.9 75.6
> 2600 158.9 78.7
> 2700 159.3 81.9
> 2800 159.0 84.8
> 2900 158.3 87.4
> 3000 157.1 89.7
> 3100 155.2 91.6
>
>
> 2550 153.8 75.0 AVERAGE
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=323113#323113
>
>
--
Rick Holland
Castle Rock, Colorado
"Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... |
247, almost identical to the model A
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=323116#323116
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1235_172.jpg
http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1236_431.jpg
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Mitsubishi Engine ready to get installed... |
Can it be run inverted?
>
>247, almost identical to the model A
>
>
>Read this topic online here:
>
>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=323116#323116
>
>
>Attachments:
>
>http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1235_172.jpg
>http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1236_431.jpg
>
--
---
Jeffrey H. Boatright, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Ophthalmology
Emory University School of Medicine
Editor-in-Chief
Molecular Vision
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Another Piet back in the air |
Lowell Durham of Milaca, Mn built and flew this Pietenpol a number of
years ago. It sat in a barn for 9 years until purchased earlier this
year by Bob Poore. Bob got it back in flying condition as you can see in
the attached picture.
Will we see it a Brodhead this year Bob?
Greg C.
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Another Piet back in the air |
That's a great picture.
And congrats to Bob!
jm
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Cardinal
Sent: Dec 12, 2010 8:07 PM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Another Piet back in the air
Lowell Durham of Milaca, Mn built and flew this
Pietenpol a number of years ago. It sat in a barn for 9 years until purchased
earlier this year by Bob Poore. Bob got it back in flying condition as you can
see in the attached picture.
Will we see it a Brodhead this year
Bob?
Greg C.
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|