Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Tue 08/09/11


Total Messages Posted: 16



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:26 AM - Re: Re: Engine out (Dan Yocum)
     2. 05:17 AM - Re: New Crankshafts for Fords (Scott Knowlton)
     3. 07:13 AM - Re: Engine out (tools)
     4. 07:28 AM - Re: Re: Engine out (Max Hegler)
     5. 08:27 AM - Re: Engine out (Baldeagle)
     6. 08:38 AM - Re: Engine out (Ozarkflyer)
     7. 08:44 AM - Re: Re: Engine out (mark lee)
     8. 09:01 AM - Re: Re: Engine out (shad bell)
     9. 09:08 AM - Re: Re: Engine out (shad bell)
    10. 10:14 AM - Re: Wise words from a wise man (dgaldrich)
    11. 10:26 AM - Re: Spins (womenfly2)
    12. 02:35 PM - three A65-12 engines for sale with all accessories, starters (Dan Yocum)
    13. 02:48 PM - Re: Engine out (Don Emch)
    14. 05:26 PM - Re: Engine out (Brett Phillips)
    15. 05:27 PM - Re: Re: Engine out (Dan Yocum)
    16. 09:36 PM - Re: Spins (GliderMike)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:26:17 AM PST US
    From: Dan Yocum <yocum137@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    But, didn't the engine block crack the day before? -- Dan Yocum yocum137@gmail.com "I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things." On Aug 8, 2011, at 9:52 PM, "Baldeagle" <baldeagle27@earthlink.net> wrote: > > 13691 with a broken crankshaft, in the beans near Momence, IL in July 2009 > > > > > > > - > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349000#349000 > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:17:43 AM PST US
    From: "Scott Knowlton " <flyingscott_k@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: New Crankshafts for Fords
    Burlington Crank has offered the same for many years. Priced at about $1000.00. Scott Knowlton -----Original Message----- From: macz@peak.org Subject: Pietenpol-List: New Crankshafts for Fords I just ran across an announcement that SCAT Enterprises, which is well-known for cranks for racing VWs and lately for newer Ford V-8 blocks, is now offering Chromoly forged cranks for Model As and Ts. They are apparently counterweighted, accurately machined and balanced and micropolished. I assume they are for insert bearings, but the announcement didn't say one way or the other. Sound interesting for Ford aficionados who can't find a good, straight, stock crank. --Mac in Oregon


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:13:17 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    From: "tools" <n0kkj@yahoo.com>
    I probably have 6 or 7 thousand hours, and no engine failures. I've shut a few down in twin engine jets, no big deal at all. Lost ALL my oil in a single engine jet, and had several other problems (took out the hydraulic flight controls, there was a manual back up), but managed to get it on the ground in under ten minutes. The engine ran flawlessly throughout, which I thought was amazing. That thing was cranking some 10K rpms, for ten minutes, with NO oil. Purely an estimate, but I probably have more than 2 thousand hours in simulators... there, on the other hand, I've lost so many engines for a while I wasn't sure I could land a plane with both engines running! I'm new to this light civil aviation thing. It's amazing how much I have to learn, and change my mindset. In the military, where all the above happened, I had an ejection seat. That TOTALLY changes your mindset. In the airlines, I've NEVER had an engine problem ANYWHERE other than on the start. And flying them single engine really is no big deal. Crazy reliable and spoils you. I got a ride in a Bonanza one day. The pilot took off, waited a while, muttered a safe landing could no longer be made and retracted the gear. My whole life, a safe STOP can't even be made quite some time before you even get airborne. Lots of little things like that. Then there's the old B-57 guys and the dreaded SEVEN engine approach! Tools Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349019#349019


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:28:04 AM PST US
    From: Max Hegler <maxhegler@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    Actually the B-57 only had two engines... of course a flight of four could have had a 7 engine approach... Max > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Engine out > From: n0kkj@yahoo.com > Date: Tue=2C 9 Aug 2011 07:10:59 -0700 > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com > > > I probably have 6 or 7 thousand hours=2C and no engine failures. I've sh ut a few down in twin engine jets=2C no big deal at all. Lost ALL my oil i n a single engine jet=2C and had several other problems (took out the hydra ulic flight controls=2C there was a manual back up)=2C but managed to get i t on the ground in under ten minutes. The engine ran flawlessly throughout =2C which I thought was amazing. That thing was cranking some 10K rpms=2C for ten minutes=2C with NO oil. > > Purely an estimate=2C but I probably have more than 2 thousand hours in s imulators... there=2C on the other hand=2C I've lost so many engines for a while I wasn't sure I could land a plane with both engines running! > > I'm new to this light civil aviation thing. It's amazing how much I have to learn=2C and change my mindset. In the military=2C where all the above happened=2C I had an ejection seat. That TOTALLY changes your mindset. I n the airlines=2C I've NEVER had an engine problem ANYWHERE other than on t he start. And flying them single engine really is no big deal. Crazy reli able and spoils you. > > I got a ride in a Bonanza one day. The pilot took off=2C waited a while =2C muttered a safe landing could no longer be made and retracted the gear. My whole life=2C a safe STOP can't even be made quite some time before yo u even get airborne. Lots of little things like that. > > Then there's the old B-57 guys and the dreaded SEVEN engine approach! > > Tools > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349019#349019 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:27:38 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    From: "Baldeagle" <baldeagle27@earthlink.net>
    yocum137(at)gmail.com wrote: > But, didn't the engine block crack the day before? > [/quote] The mag mount cracked the day before, and was welded. It broke again when the crankshaft broke, I think because the jagged halves of the crank were pounding back against the mag drive. Pulling the engine the day before to repair the mag mount, under the proverbial shade tree: - Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349027#349027


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:38:55 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    From: "Ozarkflyer" <lragan@hotmail.com>
    Actually, having been around a bunch (SAC) of B52's and a few B57's (Viet Nam) there's more than a seven engine difference. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349029#349029


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:44:23 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    From: mark lee <mlmarkelee7@gmail.com>
    Were you able to establish why that crank failed? On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Baldeagle <baldeagle27@earthlink.net> wrote: > baldeagle27@earthlink.net> > > > yocum137(at)gmail.com wrote: > > But, didn't the engine block crack the day before? > > > [/quote] > > The mag mount cracked the day before, and was welded. It broke again when > the crankshaft broke, I think because the jagged halves of the crank were > pounding back against the mag drive. > > Pulling the engine the day before to repair the mag mount, under the > proverbial shade tree: > > > - > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349027#349027 > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:53 AM PST US
    From: shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    The B-52, Man it would be scary to loose an engine in one of those, you wou ld have to shoot the dreaded 7 engine approach. - Shad don't archive


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:08:32 AM PST US
    From: shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    Well I hate to admit-it but I know how it feels.- Good luck rebuilding her.- Was there any damage to the airframe, engine mount etc?- Hope to see you flying again soon. - Shad --- On Mon, 8/8/11, Baldeagle <baldeagle27@earthlink.net> wrote: From: Baldeagle <baldeagle27@earthlink.net> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Engine out t> 13691 with a broken crankshaft, in the beans near Momence, IL in July 2009 - Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349000#349000 le, List Admin.


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:14:22 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wise words from a wise man
    From: "dgaldrich" <dgaldrich@embarqmail.com>
    Excellent article. One important point for those of us building "older" designs is that we are forced to do some ad hoc engineering, Case in point, seat belt/shoulder harness. My Hoopman plans show nothing in that area so, like all the rest, I'll have to borrow from others and apply my version of best practice. In all probability, my version will be a TLAR installation but, to the best of my meager knowledge, that's what the young Mr Pietenpol did from the start so at least there's some consistency. TLAR -- That Looks About Right. Absent guidance from the designer at least we have Tony Bingelis for things like fuel system, brakes, electrics (I know, such heresy) and so on. Dave do not archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349044#349044


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:26:29 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Spins
    From: "womenfly2" <Love2Fly.KAP@gmail.com>
    FAA: Sec. 91.303 Aerobatic flight. No person may operate an aircraft in aerobatic flight-- (a) Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement; (b) Over an open air assembly of persons; (c) Within the lateral boundaries of the surface areas of Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace designated for an airport; (d) Within 4 nautical miles of the center line of any Federal airway; (e) Below an altitude of 1,500 feet above the surface; or (f) When flight visibility is less than 3 statute miles. For the purposes of this section, aerobatic flight means an intentional maneuver involving an abrupt change in an aircraft's attitude, an abnormal attitude, or abnormal acceleration, not necessary for normal flight. What are the safety margins designed into the Pietenpol? What is the designed wing loads and stress at designed weight? What does yours weight? Any mod's? .... any questions? -------- Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349046#349046


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:35:11 PM PST US
    From: Dan Yocum <yocum137@gmail.com>
    Subject: three A65-12 engines for sale with all accessories, starters
    Hi all, I just got off the phone with Rob Bach and he informs me that Ray Allen (of the Mooney Mite club) in Camp Verde, AZ has 3 low time A65-12 engines sitting on stands waiting to be installed on a/c. These engines come with carbs, mags, and best of all, starters. Two engines have 600 hrs total time and I think he's asking around $6-7K. One engine has 2000 hrs total time and I think he's asking around $9k because it has new Millenium cylinders. All engines are 0 time SMOH. If anyone is interested, drop me a line off list and I'll help you get the info. Cheers, Dan


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:48:01 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    From: "Don Emch" <EmchAir@aol.com>
    Wow, Baldeagle ... looks like a real group of "shady" mechanics there if you ask me... Don Emch NX899DE do not archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349054#349054


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:26:57 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    From: "Brett Phillips" <bphillip@shentel.net>
    I think I recognize several good eggs in that shot. Did Frank ever find out why or where the crank broke? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349069#349069


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:27:05 PM PST US
    From: Dan Yocum <yocum@fnal.gov>
    Subject: Re: Engine out
    Andrew, What kind/size of tires are on 13691. Those things are huge! Dan On 08/09/2011 10:25 AM, Baldeagle wrote: > --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "Baldeagle"<baldeagle27@earthlink.net> > > > yocum137(at)gmail.com wrote: >> But, didn't the engine block crack the day before? >> > [/quote] > > The mag mount cracked the day before, and was welded. It broke again when the crankshaft broke, I think because the jagged halves of the crank were pounding back against the mag drive. > > Pulling the engine the day before to repair the mag mount, under the proverbial shade tree: > > > - > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349027#349027 > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ -- Dan Yocum Fermilab 630.840.6509 yocum@fnal.gov, http://fermigrid.fnal.gov "I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things."


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:36:13 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Spins
    From: "GliderMike" <glidermikeg@yahoo.com>
    I am beginning to think I should never have brought up the subject of spins. It seems spins are more controversial than Corvairs. do not archive -------- HOMEBUILDER Will WORK for Spruce Long flights, smooth air, and soft landings, GliderMike, aka Mike Glasgow Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349092#349092




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --