Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:34 AM - Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts (helspersew@aol.com)
     2. 05:09 AM - Re: Steam box for bending plywood (Jerry Dotson)
     3. 05:11 AM - Re: Steam box for bending plywood (Jack Phillips)
     4. 05:18 AM - rib response (JOSEPH SWITHIN)
     5. 05:31 AM - Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts (Keith Hodge)
     6. 05:53 AM - Galvanic Corrosion (Jack Phillips)
     7. 06:20 AM - Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts (Jerry Dotson)
     8. 06:42 AM - Re: Galvanic Corrosion (airlion)
     9. 06:49 AM - Re: Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts (airlion)
    10. 07:38 AM - Re: Galvanic Corrosion (skellytown flyer)
    11. 08:16 AM - Re: Steam box for bending plywood (Gary Boothe)
    12. 08:22 AM - Re: Galvanic Corrosion (Bill Church)
    13. 08:44 AM - Re: Re: Galvanic Corrosion (Jack@textors.com)
    14. 10:48 AM - Re: Re: Galvanic Corrosion (Gary Boothe)
    15. 10:49 AM - Re: Steam box for bending plywood (shad bell)
    16. 11:03 AM - Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts (helspersew@aol.com)
    17. 01:49 PM - Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts (Jerry Dotson)
    18. 02:02 PM - Re: Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts (airlion)
    19. 02:58 PM - Re: rib jig (rorichts)
    20. 03:27 PM - Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts (Keith Hodge)
    21. 05:48 PM - Re: Re: rib jig (Greg Cardinal)
    22. 07:04 PM - Re: rib jig (rorichts)
    23. 07:08 PM - Re: Re: rib jig (Ben Charvet)
    24. 09:17 PM - Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts (Doug Dever)
    25. 09:21 PM - Re: Galvanic Corrosion (Doug Dever)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts | 
      
      
      Gardiner,
      
      Here are a couple photos showing the jam nut on the fork threads, providing
       for the adjustment and locking ability. I am not an engineer, I can't imag
      ine a corrosion problem between the fork threads and the 7075 aluminum inse
      rt. Maybe someone with more technical knowledge could chime in (Jack or Bil
      l) and give us the official low-down. Hope this helps.
      
      Dan Helsper
      Puryear, TN 
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steam box for bending plywood | 
      
      
      Hey Shad when I saw the boiler setup I thought  WHISKEY STILL! It makes plenty
      of steam
      
      
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Jerry Dotson
      59 Daniel Johnson Rd
      Baker, FL 32531
      
      Started building  NX510JD  July, 2009
      now covering and painting
      21" wheels
      Lycoming O-235 C2C
      Jay Anderson CloudCars prop 76 X 44
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365087#365087
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Steam box for bending plywood | 
      
      Very cool, Shad.  Nice to see that Homebuilder ingenuity is alive and well!
      
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      
      Do Not Archive
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of shad bell
      Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 12:36 AM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Steam box for bending plywood
      
      
      Hear's a few pics of the steamer.
      
      Shad
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Thank-You everyone for your help. When I reach the next phase I will let you knwo.
      
      Joe
      Do Not Archive
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts | 
      
      Hello Dan,
      
      I am building a Pietenpol over here in the UK.
      
      Do you happen to have the part number for the fork end which is shown in 
      the second photograph (i.e. the one with the slot horizontal) and can 
      you confirm the thread size.
      
      My project has been laid up for some time whilst I was building a house 
      and I seem to have lost my records of where i ordered them from.
      
      Regards Keith Hodge
      
      P.S. I have attached a rather poor photo of my efforts, which is to be 
      slightly unusual in having a BMW K100 motor cycle engine with Rotax 3 to 
      1 gearbox driving a lightweight prop.
      
      P.P.S And finally, regarding the corrosion comments I found (sea photo 
      2) that my steel fuel filler neck was immovable when I came to remove it 
      due to corrosion (or did I use locktite? It was so long ago that I 
      cannot remember. The one thing I was certainly not happy about was the 
      fact that I paid top dollar from an approved supplier for the parts 
      which I thought would be properly plated, but they were sure not. I will 
      be stove enamelling the replacement before fitting it.
      
      
      On 29/01/2012 12:32 PM, helspersew@aol.com wrote:
      > Gardiner,
      > Here are a couple photos showing the jam nut on the fork threads, 
      > providing for the adjustment and locking ability. I am not an 
      > engineer, I can't imagine a corrosion problem between the fork threads 
      > and the 7075 aluminum insert. Maybe someone with more technical 
      > knowledge could chime in (Jack or Bill) and give us the official 
      > low-down. Hope this helps.
      > Dan Helsper
      > Puryear, TN
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Galvanic Corrosion | 
      
      All right, Dan.  Now you've done it and inspired my Geekiness to come to the
      surface.  Let's talk a bit about Galvanic Corrosion.  This occurs when you
      have dissimilar metals in intimate contact in an environment where they can
      get wet, such as at the ends of lift struts.  Not all dissimilar metals
      cause problems - it depends on how "Anodic" they are.  There is a chart
      listing the Anodic Index of all common metals.  To find the susceptibility
      to corrosion of any metal pair, find the difference in their anodic indices
      - the corrosion will take place at the more anodic of the pair (this is why
      on outboard motors that may be run in saltwater you will find "sacrificial
      anodes" of magnesium or zinc on the aluminum casings of the motor, so the
      corrosion takes place there rather than on the aluminum.
      
      
      The rule of thumb to be safe from galvanic corrosion is to have a difference
      in anodic index of no more than about 0.15 - 0.20 for an outdoor
      environment.  Here is the chart:
      
      
      Metal Category                                                  Anodic Index
      (volts)
      
      
      Gold, solid and plated                                         0.00
      
      Rhodium plated on Silver-plated Copper               0.05
      
      Silver, high Nickel-Copper alloys                          0.15
      
      Nickel, Titanium, Monel                                      0.30
      
      Copper, Silver Solder, high Copper-Nickel             0.35
      
      alloys, Nickel-Chromium alloys
      
      Brasses & Bronzes                                            0.40
      
      18% Chromium Stainless Steel                           0.50
      
      Chromium plating, Tin plating                              0.60
      
      Tin-Lead solder                                                  0.65
      
      Lead                                                                 0.70
      
      Aluminum, wrought, 2000 series                          0.75
      
      Iron, plain carbon or low-alloy steel                      0.85
      
      Aluminum, wrought alloys other than 2000           0.90
      
      series (such as 7075)
      
      Cast Aluminum alloys, Cadmium plating              0.95
      
      and Chromates
      
      Hot-dip Zinc, galvanized steel                              1.20
      
      Zinc                                                                  1.25
      
      Magnesium                                                       1.75
      
      Beryllium                                                           1.85
      
      
      One of the important things to notice is that cad-plated steel (such as AN
      aircraft hardware) is not too bad when placed against 2024 series aluminum,
      and is even better against 7075 series.  What is surprising to most people
      is how bad stainless steel is against aluminum (difference of .40 to .50).
      
      
      Hope this helps.  By the way, I changed the subject to hopefully make this
      chart easier to locate in the archives
      
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      NX899JP
      
      Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      helspersew@aol.com
      Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 7:32 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts
      
      
      Gardiner,
      
      
      Here are a couple photos showing the jam nut on the fork threads, providing
      for the adjustment and locking ability. I am not an engineer, I can't
      imagine a corrosion problem between the fork threads and the 7075 aluminum
      insert. Maybe someone with more technical knowledge could chime in (Jack or
      Bill) and give us the official low-down. Hope this helps.
      
      
      Dan Helsper
      
      Puryear, TN 
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts | 
      
      
      Dan if you tied the plane down outdoors where Ben Charvet lives I feel sure in
      a few years  there would be corrosion. I had a Luscombe tied down outdoors about
      2 miles from the Atlantic. There was steel to aluminum together at the prop
      flanges. The aluminum prop was sandwiched between steel with steel bolts. There
      was no significant corrosion there but I paid attention to it. I don't think
      a hangared airplane will have any real corrosion problem. That said most combinations
      of dissimilar metals touching has the potential for corrosion. 
       I worked for Florida Gas Transmission Co 41 years. They have 3 pipelines coming
      from Texas going past Miami to Turkey Point with lateral lines serving most
      of the state. They use cathodic protection with anode beds(note dissimilar metal
      with the leads fastened to the pipes) and dc rectifiers with a fixed current
      output located about every 20 miles. So that said in the right circumstances
      dissimilar metals can help! If the pipe to soil voltage dropped below 0.8 volt
      we would raise the current out put near 1.2 volts. That meant deterioration
      of the pipe coating.
       My struts have threads on both ends. In a few weeks I hope to start the final
      assembly. I will coat the threads with silver Never Seez. Good stuff. Stays put.
       I have no pedigree, just finished highschool.
      
      
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Jerry Dotson
      59 Daniel Johnson Rd
      Baker, FL 32531
      
      Started building  NX510JD  July, 2009
      now covering and painting
      21" wheels
      Lycoming O-235 C2C
      Jay Anderson CloudCars prop 76 X 44
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365099#365099
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Galvanic Corrosion | 
      
      Thanks Jack, your explanation of galvanic corrosion makes more sense than a
      ny that I have heard. Gardiner
      
      --- On Sun, 1/29/12, Jack Phillips <pietflyr@bellsouth.net> wrote:
      
      From: Jack Phillips <pietflyr@bellsouth.net>
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Galvanic Corrosion
      
      =0A=0A=0A =0A =0A=0A =0A=0A =0A=0A =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AAll right,
       Dan.=C2- Now you=99ve=0Adone it and inspired my Geekiness to come 
      to the surface.=C2- Let=99s=0Atalk a bit about Galvanic Corrosion.
      =C2- This occurs when you have dissimilar=0Ametals in intimate contact in
       an environment where they can get wet, such as at=0Athe ends of lift strut
      s.=C2- Not all dissimilar metals cause problems =93=0Ait depends on
       how =9CAnodic=9D they are.=C2- There is a chart listing=0Ath
      e Anodic Index of all common metals.=C2- To find the susceptibility to=0A
      corrosion of any metal pair, find the difference in their anodic indices 
      =93=0Athe corrosion will take place at the more anodic of the pair (t
      his is why on=0Aoutboard motors that may be run in saltwater you will find 
      =9Csacrificial=0Aanodes=9D of magnesium or zinc on the aluminum
       casings of the motor, so the=0Acorrosion takes place there rather than on 
      the aluminum. =0A=0A =C2- =0A=0AThe rule of thumb to be safe from galvani
      c=0Acorrosion is to have a difference in anodic index of no more than about
       0.15 - 0.20=0Afor an outdoor environment.=C2- Here is the chart: =0A=0A 
      =C2- =0A=0AMetal Category=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2- Anodic=0AIndex (volts) =0A=0A =C2- =0A=0AGold, soli
      d and plated=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.00 =0A=0ARhodium plated on Silver-plated Copp
      er=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2- 0.05 =0A=0ASilver, high Nickel-Copper alloys=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- =C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.15 =0A=0ANickel, T
      itanium, Monel=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2- 0.30 =0A=0ACopper, Silver Solder, high Copper-Nickel=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.35 =0A=0A
      alloys, Nickel-Chromium alloys =0A=0ABrasses & Bronzes=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2- 0.40 =0A=0A18% Chromium Stainless Steel=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.50 =0A=0AChr
      omium plating, Tin plating=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.60 =0A=0ATin-Lead sol
      der=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.
      65 =0A=0ALead=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.70 =0A=0AAluminum, wrought, 2000 series=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.75 =0A
      =0AIron, plain carbon or low-alloy steel=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2- 0.85 =0A=0AAluminum, wrought alloys other than 2000=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.90 =0A=0Aseries
       (such as 7075) =0A=0ACast Aluminum alloys, Cadmium plating=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 0.95 =0A=0A
      and Chromates =0A=0AHot-dip Zinc, galvanized steel=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
       1.20 =0A=0AZinc=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 1.25 =0A=0AMagnesium=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      - 1.75 =0A=0ABeryllium=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
      -=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
      =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- 1.
      85 =0A=0A =C2- =0A=0AOne of the important things to notice is=0Athat cad-
      plated steel (such as AN aircraft hardware) is not too bad when placed=0Aag
      ainst 2024 series aluminum, and is even better against 7075 series.=C2-
      =0AWhat is surprising to most people is how bad stainless steel is against
      =0Aaluminum (difference of .40 to .50). =0A=0A =C2- =0A=0AHope this helps
      .=C2- By the way, I=0Achanged the subject to hopefully make this chart ea
      sier to locate in the=0Aarchives =0A=0A =C2- =0A=0AJack Phillips =0A=0ANX
      899JP =0A=0ASmith Mountain Lake, Virginia =0A=0A =C2- =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
      =0A=0A=0A=0AFrom:=0Aowner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com=0A[mailto:own
      er-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of helspersew@aol.com
      =0ASent: Sunday, January 29, 2012=0A7:32 AM
      =0ATo: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      =0ASubject: Pietenpol-List: Question=0Aabout lower fork ends- aluminum stru
      ts =0A=0A=0A=0A =C2- =0A=0A=0A=0AGardiner, =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=C2- =0A
      =0A=0A=0A=0A=0AHere are a couple photos showing the jam=0Anut on the fork t
      hreads, providing for the adjustment and locking ability. I am=0Anot an eng
      ineer, I can't imagine a corrosion problem between the fork threads=0Aand t
      he 7075 aluminum insert. Maybe someone with more technical knowledge could
      =0Achime in (Jack or Bill) and give us the official low-down. Hope this hel
      ps. =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=C2- =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ADan Helsper =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
      =0APuryear,=0A TN=C2- =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts | 
      
      
      Jerry, where do you get silver never seize? I haver never heard of it. Gardiner
      
      --- On Sun, 1/29/12, Jerry Dotson <jdotson@centurylink.net> wrote:
      
      > From: Jerry Dotson <jdotson@centurylink.net>
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Date: Sunday, January 29, 2012, 9:18 AM
      > --> Pietenpol-List message posted
      > by: "Jerry Dotson" <jdotson@centurylink.net>
      > 
      > Dan if you tied the plane down outdoors where Ben Charvet
      > lives I feel sure in a few years there would be
      > corrosion. I had a Luscombe tied down outdoors about 2 miles
      > from the Atlantic. There was steel to aluminum together at
      > the prop flanges. The aluminum prop was sandwiched between
      > steel with steel bolts. There was no significant corrosion
      > there but I paid attention to it. I don't think a hangared
      > airplane will have any real corrosion problem. That said
      > most combinations of dissimilar metals touching has the
      > potential for corrosion. 
      >  I worked for Florida Gas Transmission Co 41 years. They
      > have 3 pipelines coming from Texas going past Miami to
      > Turkey Point with lateral lines serving most of the state.
      > They use cathodic protection with anode beds(note dissimilar
      > metal with the leads fastened to the pipes) and dc
      > rectifiers with a fixed current output located about every
      > 20 miles. So that said in the right circumstances dissimilar
      > metals can help! If the pipe to soil voltage dropped below
      > 0.8 volt we would raise the current out put near 1.2 volts.
      > That meant deterioration of the pipe coating.
      >  My struts have threads on both ends. In a few weeks I hope
      > to start the final assembly. I will coat the threads with
      > silver Never Seez. Good stuff. Stays put.
      >  I have no pedigree, just finished highschool.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > do not archive
      > 
      > --------
      > Jerry Dotson
      > 59 Daniel Johnson Rd
      > Baker, FL 32531
      > 
      > Started building NX510JD July, 2009
      > now covering and painting
      > 21" wheels
      > Lycoming O-235 C2C
      > Jay Anderson CloudCars prop 76 X 44
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365099#365099
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Email Forum -
      > - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
      > List Contribution Web Site -
      >        -Matt
      > Dralle, List Admin.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Galvanic Corrosion | 
      
      
      On my aluminum struts I also used steel straps to mount the jury struts- but I
      put a layer of very heavy poly tape that is used to wrap pipelines with underground.I
      was concerned with the possibility of corrosion but also the tendency
      of aluminum to wear fast of it is under vibration against another hard surface.Raymond
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365111#365111
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Steam box for bending plywood | 
      
      Ingenious, Shad.but that's one funny looking wing.;-)
      
      
      Gary Boothe
      
      Do not archive
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of shad bell
      Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 9:36 PM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Steam box for bending plywood
      
      
      Hear's a few pics of the steamer.
      
      Shad
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Galvanic Corrosion | 
      
      
      Lucky for me, Jack stepped up. Otherwise I might have had my geekiness inspired
      to come to the surface as well.
      
      Bill C.
      
      do not archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365120#365120
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Galvanic Corrosion | 
      
      
      That would be too much for one day Bill
      Jack
      Do not archive 
      
      Sent from my iPad
      
      On Jan 29, 2012, at 10:20 AM, "Bill Church" <billspiet@sympatico.ca> wrote:
      
      > 
      > Lucky for me, Jack stepped up. Otherwise I might have had my geekiness inspired
      to come to the surface as well.
      > 
      > Bill C.
      > 
      > do not archive
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365120#365120
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Galvanic Corrosion | 
      
      
      ...as opposed to... when?
      
      Gary Boothe
      NX308MB
      Do not archive
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Church
      Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 8:21 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Galvanic Corrosion
      
      --> <billspiet@sympatico.ca>
      
      Lucky for me, Jack stepped up. Otherwise I might have had my geekiness
      inspired to come to the surface as well.
      
      Bill C.
      
      do not archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365120#365120
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Steam box for bending plywood | 
      
      I decided to make the jig 2 sided after I bent the first piece of ply, it t
      ook a lot of propane to heat up the cold water, so I wanted to keep it goin
      g.=C2- The other thing was I didn't want to waste 2 weeks just to wait fo
      r the plywood to dry out so I could mask it off and varnish the insides.=C2
      - Should have the top wings ready for fabric by spring.=C2- The bottoms
       still need some pully fittings made before I can sheet them.
      =C2-
      Shad
      
      --- On Sun, 1/29/12, Gary Boothe <gboothe5@comcast.net> wrote:
      
      
      From: Gary Boothe <gboothe5@comcast.net>
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Steam box for bending plywood
      
      
      Ingenious, Shadbut that=99s one funny looking wing;
      -)
      =C2-
      Gary Boothe
      Do not archive
      =C2-
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis
      t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of shad bell
      Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 9:36 PM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Steam box for bending plywood
      =C2-
      
      
      Hear's a few pics of the steamer.
      
      Shad
      =C2-
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts | 
      
      
      Keith,
      
      Here is a link from ACS for the Piper J-3 forks I used.
      
      http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/strutadjfbsets1.php
      
      Dan Helsper
      Puryear, TN
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts | 
      
      
      >Gardiner any auto parts store should carry anti-seize compound. It may be Permatex
      brand. Never Seez is a brand name that I used on recip and turbine engines.
      If you can wait a week or 2 I will mail you an ounce in a med bottle. That
      is enough to do all the Piets struts on the list.
      Jerry
      
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Jerry Dotson
      59 Daniel Johnson Rd
      Baker, FL 32531
      
      Started building  NX510JD  July, 2009
      now covering and painting
      21" wheels
      Lycoming O-235 C2C
      Jay Anderson CloudCars prop 76 X 44
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365160#365160
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts | 
      
      
      Thanks Jerry, you don't have to do that cause I am going to see you when my wife
      and are going to Destin for her Rotary convention. I can't remember the date
      yet but I'll let you know. Gardiner
      
      --- On Sun, 1/29/12, Jerry Dotson <jdotson@centurylink.net> wrote:
      
      > From: Jerry Dotson <jdotson@centurylink.net>
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Date: Sunday, January 29, 2012, 4:46 PM
      > --> Pietenpol-List message posted
      > by: "Jerry Dotson" <jdotson@centurylink.net>
      > 
      > >Gardiner any auto parts store should carry anti-seize
      > compound. It may be Permatex brand. Never Seez is a brand
      > name that I used on recip and turbine engines. If you can
      > wait a week or 2 I will mail you an ounce in a med bottle.
      > That is enough to do all the Piets struts on the list.
      > Jerry
      > 
      > do not archive
      > 
      > --------
      > Jerry Dotson
      > 59 Daniel Johnson Rd
      > Baker, FL 32531
      > 
      > Started building NX510JD July, 2009
      > now covering and painting
      > 21" wheels
      > Lycoming O-235 C2C
      > Jay Anderson CloudCars prop 76 X 44
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365160#365160
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Email Forum -
      > - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
      > List Contribution Web Site -
      >        -Matt
      > Dralle, List Admin.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      As for building ribs to what extent if any is sanding the joints and gussets a
      part of the process? I have been told to hold to a minimum because of the sanded
      material degrading the integrity of the joint.
      thanks
      rich
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365167#365167
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts | 
      
      Thanks Dan,
      
      Now I can get my credit card out and get the job finished.
      
      Keith
      
      
      On 29/01/2012 7:00 PM, helspersew@aol.com wrote:
      > Keith,
      > Here is a link from ACS for the Piper J-3 forks I used.
      > http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/strutadjfbsets1.php
      > Dan Helsper
      > Puryear, TN
      > *
      >
      >
      > *
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Rich,
      
      You have been told correctly. The sanded material fills the pores of the 
      wood and can prevent proper adhesive absorption.
      If you do sand the parts make sure you vacuum the pieces before applying 
      adhesive.
      Best practice is to lightly scrape the pieces just before glueing.
      
      That being said, I did some very unscientific testing by glueing sanded 
      pieces together with T88. The glue joints did not fail.
      
      Greg Cardinal
      Minneapolis
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "rorichts" <stolflite@gmail.com>
      Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 4:55 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: rib jig
      
      
      >
      > As for building ribs to what extent if any is sanding the joints and 
      > gussets a part of the process? I have been told to hold to a minimum 
      > because of the sanded material degrading the integrity of the joint.
      > thanks
      > rich
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365167#365167
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Thanks for the help, wanting to error (maybe not a good choice of word) anyway
      will redo wing and call the first part of the cost of education. It has been and
      interesting experience.
      thanks again
      rich
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365183#365183
      
      
Message 23
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I had a nice belt/disc sander that I used during the rib making 
      process.  If you push to spruce/doug fir strips into the sanding disc 
      too much the end gets pretty smooth and looks like the sap has melted, 
      forming a slightly shiny end.  I guess that should be avoided, but I 
      believe most of the strength of the joints is in the gussets.  I was 
      also told that all plywood gussets need to be scuff sanded to improve 
      adhesion.  Especially the birch aircraft plywood.  Lots easier to block 
      sand the plywood sheet prior to cutting out the gussets.  Having said 
      all that a T-88 joint is pretty strong if you do everything wrong.
      
      If you ever have doubts, try some destructive testing, you'll sleep 
      better at night ;-) .
      
      Ben Charvet
      On 1/29/2012 5:55 PM, rorichts wrote:
      > -->  Pietenpol-List message posted by: "rorichts"<stolflite@gmail.com>
      >
      > As for building ribs to what extent if any is sanding the joints and gussets
      a part of the process? I have been told to hold to a minimum because of the sanded
      material degrading the integrity of the joint.
      > thanks
      > rich
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=365167#365167
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Ben Charvet, PharmD
      Staff Pharmacist
      Parrish Medical center
      
      
Message 24
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts | 
      
      
      You shouldn't have any=2C especially if the fork is cadmium plated and if y
      our really concerned=2C used some dielectric compound on the threads.  But
      =2C then=2C like you I am not an engineer.
      
      
      Doug Dever
      In beautiful Stow Ohio
      
      
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts
      From: helspersew@aol.com
      
      
      Gardiner=2C
      
      Here are a couple photos showing the jam nut on the fork threads=2C providi
      ng for the adjustment and locking ability. I am not an engineer=2C I can't 
      imagine a corrosion problem between the fork threads and the 7075 aluminum 
      insert. Maybe someone with more technical knowledge could chime in (Jack or
       Bill) and give us the official low-down. Hope this helps.
      
      Dan Helsper
      Puryear=2C TN  		 	   		  
      
Message 25
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Galvanic Corrosion | 
      
      
      Now that's what we were looking for.  However=2C I will say that we put all
       stainless bolts on our float fittings (non structural) and had zero corros
      ion after 10yrs.  Go figure.
      
      
      Doug Dever
      In beautiful Stow Ohio
      
      
      From: pietflyr@bellsouth.net
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Galvanic Corrosion
      
      
      All right=2C Dan.  Now you=92ve done it and inspired my Geekiness to come t
      o the surface.  Let=92s talk a bit about Galvanic Corrosion.  This occurs w
      hen you have dissimilar metals in intimate contact in an environment where 
      they can get wet=2C such as at the ends of lift struts.  Not all dissimilar
       metals cause problems ' it depends on how =93Anodic=94 they are.  There 
      is a chart listing the Anodic Index of all common metals.  To find the susc
      eptibility to corrosion of any metal pair=2C find the difference in their a
      nodic indices ' the corrosion will take place at the more anodic of the p
      air (this is why on outboard motors that may be run in saltwater you will f
      ind =93sacrificial anodes=94 of magnesium or zinc on the aluminum casings o
      f the motor=2C so the corrosion takes place there rather than on the alumin
      um.
      
      The rule of thumb to be safe from galvanic corrosion is to have a differenc
      e in anodic index of no more than about 0.15 - 0.20 for an outdoor environm
      ent.  Here is the chart:
      
      Metal Category                                                  Anodic Inde
      x (volts)
      
      Gold=2C solid and plated                                         0.00
      Rhodium plated on Silver-plated Copper               0.05
      Silver=2C high Nickel-Copper alloys                          0.15
      Nickel=2C Titanium=2C Monel                                      0.30
      Copper=2C Silver Solder=2C high Copper-Nickel             0.35
      alloys=2C Nickel-Chromium alloys
      Brasses & Bronzes                                            0.40
      18% Chromium Stainless Steel                           0.50
      Chromium plating=2C Tin plating                              0.60
      Tin-Lead solder                                                  0.65
      Lead                                                                 0.70
      Aluminum=2C wrought=2C 2000 series                          0.75
      Iron=2C plain carbon or low-alloy steel                      0.85
      Aluminum=2C wrought alloys other than 2000           0.90
      series (such as 7075)
      Cast Aluminum alloys=2C Cadmium plating              0.95
      and Chromates
      Hot-dip Zinc=2C galvanized steel                              1.20
      Zinc                                                                  1.25
      Magnesium                                                       1.75
      Beryllium                                                           1.85
      
      One of the important things to notice is that cad-plated steel (such as AN 
      aircraft hardware) is not too bad when placed against 2024 series aluminum
      =2C and is even better against 7075 series.  What is surprising to most peo
      ple is how bad stainless steel is against aluminum (difference of .40 to .5
      0).
      
      Hope this helps.  By the way=2C I changed the subject to hopefully make thi
      s chart easier to locate in the archives
      
      Jack Phillips
      NX899JP
      Smith Mountain Lake=2C Virginia
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis
      t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of helspersew@aol.com
      Sent: Sunday=2C January 29=2C 2012 7:32 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Question about lower fork ends- aluminum struts
      
      
      Gardiner=2C
      
      
      Here are a couple photos showing the jam nut on the fork threads=2C providi
      ng for the adjustment and locking ability. I am not an engineer=2C I can't 
      imagine a corrosion problem between the fork threads and the 7075 aluminum 
      insert. Maybe someone with more technical knowledge could chime in (Jack or
       Bill) and give us the official low-down. Hope this helps.
      
      
      Dan Helsper
      
      Puryear=2C TN 
      
      
       		 	   		  
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |