Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:48 AM - landing gear (JOSEPH SWITHIN)
     2. 05:23 AM - Re: landing gear (Gary Boothe)
     3. 06:11 AM - Re: landing gear (TOM MICHELLE BRANT)
     4. 07:31 AM - Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions (tools)
     5. 08:42 AM - Re: landing gear (echobravo4)
     6. 08:53 AM - First Flight of VH-XHE (johnwoods@westnet.com.au)
     7. 10:57 AM - Re: Re: what I would do differently, wing spars and other things (airlion)
     8. 11:03 AM - Re: First Flight of VH-XHE (Jack Phillips)
     9. 11:20 AM - Re: First Flight of VH-XHE (nightmare)
    10. 11:30 AM - Re: First Flight of VH-XHE (nightmare)
    11. 11:34 AM - Re: what I would do differently, wing spars and other things (kevinpurtee)
    12. 11:54 AM - Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions (Mark Roberts)
    13. 12:26 PM - Re: landing gear (Chris)
    14. 01:33 PM - Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions (tools)
    15. 01:40 PM - Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions (tools)
    16. 01:53 PM - Re: Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions (Ryan Mueller)
    17. 02:24 PM - Re: landing gear (Billy McCaskill)
    18. 02:49 PM - Re: First Flight of VH-XHE (V Groah)
    19. 03:23 PM - Re: Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions (Jack Phillips)
    20. 04:08 PM - Re: landing gear (jarheadpilot82)
    21. 05:41 PM - bottom fitting plate (Daniel Engelkenjohn)
    22. 05:58 PM - Re: Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions (Jack Phillips)
    23. 06:51 PM - Re: First Flight of VH-XHE (johnwoods@westnet.com.au)
    24. 09:34 PM - Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions (Mark Roberts)
    25. 09:35 PM - Re: bottom fitting plate (Chris)
    26. 09:37 PM - Re: First Flight of VH-XHE (taildrags)
    27. 09:55 PM - Re: Re: First Flight of VH-XHE?????// (jorge lizarraga)
    28. 11:20 PM - Re: Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions (Clif Dawson)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      After looking at the Sky Scout and the Aircamper, today's question is: Would the
      landing gear used on the Sky Scout work on the Aircamper? Has anyone tried this,
      or is there a flaw/design issue that would not allow this to work?
      
      Joe Swithin
      Morris, IL
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Oooo.A Sky-camper! You take advantage of the fact that TC has left the
      building, although I'm sure this is merely the Sunday morning musings of an
      idle mind. Joe - Please explain yourself before you invoke the wrath of his
      deputy, Safety Dan! I suspect that this falls into the category of 'some
      things you just don't do', like pee into the wind, or kick sand in Chuck
      Norris' face.
      
      
      Gary Boothe
      
      NX308MB
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of JOSEPH
      SWITHIN
      Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 4:48 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: landing gear
      
      
      After looking at the Sky Scout and the Aircamper, today's question is: Would
      the landing gear used on the Sky Scout work on the Aircamper? Has anyone
      tried this, or is there a flaw/design issue that would not allow this to
      work?
      
      Joe Swithin
      Morris, IL
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I looked at doing this -(not the peeing into the wind part) - The vertical 
      strut that goes up to the top longeron seems to be the problem for the airc
      amper.  The point that it meets the longeron in the scout is braced horizon
      tally across the fuselage where as in the aircamper=2C it wouldn't be due t
      o the location of the front seat.  Of course this was after looking at it f
      or 5-10 minutes so It's possible that I missed something and someone might 
      be able to figure something out.
      
      Tom B.
      
      From: gboothe5@comcast.net
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: landing gear
      
      Oooo=85A Sky-camper! You take advantage of the fact that TC has left the bu
      ilding=2C although I=92m sure this is merely the Sunday morning musings of 
      an idle mind. Joe ' Please explain yourself before you invoke the wrath o
      f his deputy=2C Safety Dan! I suspect that this falls into the category of 
      =91some things you just don=92t do=92=2C like pee into the wind=2C or kick 
      sand in Chuck Norris=92 face=85 Gary BootheNX308MB From: owner-pietenpol-li
      st-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] 
      On Behalf Of JOSEPH SWITHIN
      Sent: Sunday=2C September 09=2C 2012 4:48 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: landing gear After looking at the Sky Scout and th
      e Aircamper=2C today's question is: Would the landing gear used on the Sky 
      Scout work on the Aircamper? Has anyone tried this=2C or is there a flaw/de
      sign issue that would not allow this to work?
      
      Joe Swithin
      Morris=2C IL   http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://foru
      ms.matronics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution 
      
      
       		 	   		  
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions | 
      
      
      Mine are about a half inch I'd say (I'm not where the plane is now to check for
      sure).
      
      That upper hole being located on the centerline of the longeron should set things
      where they were designed to be.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382729#382729
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: landing gear | 
      
      
      yep-
      been done
      Walter Argenbright- pics on west coast piet
      
      --------
      Earl Brown
      
      I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I
      intended to be.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382732#382732
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | First Flight of VH-XHE | 
      
      
      Dear List, 
      
      
      I am please to report that o n Monday 27th August at 0700, Aircamper VH-XHE took
      first flight with builder Graham Hewitt, aged 84, at the controls. 
      The 20 minute flight was completed safely at Jandakot airport in Western Australia.
      
      
      
      This morning, 9th Sept at 0700, Graham took to the skies for a second time completing
      two circuits and landing safely on the grass strip adjacent to the runway.
      
      
      
      Those of you who have been on the list for a while may remember Graham. He started
      the project about 7 years ago. The Pietenpol being his third homebuilt. 
      Graham is a retired airline pilot with many thousands of hours flying single and
      multi engine conventional U/C aircraft and holds a low level aerobatic rating.
      
      
      
      Graham's Aircamper is the long fuselage variant with Riblette 612 aerofoil and
      powered by an O-235 Lycoming. 
      
      
      The wing, incorporating built-up spars and Piper style landing gear construction
      are from Jim Wills plans. Graham has also incorporated a door for the front
      seat. 
      Empty weight at 740lbs, initial flight reports indicate an excellent ROC and 85
      kts at 2500 RPM with a 68x45 prop and at 33 kts she was still flying but had
      a high ROD and wings stayed level. 
      
      
      Initial flight problem was a nose heavy tendency possibly caused by wash-in at
      the tips of the stabiliser. 
      This was corrected prior to the second flight however back stick was still required
      to keep the nose from dropping in level flight. To be resolved first before
      more extensive flight testing can continue. 
      
      
      The wing is shifted back 2" from vertical and the CoG was with in range for the
      612. 
      
      
      See attached photo of VH-XHE resting after her second flight. 
      
      
      Hopefully a video will be posted in time and I can provide updates as to flight
      performance, especially for those interested in the 612. 
      
      
      Best regards, 
      John Woods 
      Perth, Western Australia 
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: what I would do differently, wing spars and other | 
      things
      
      
      Kevin, you might consider putting an aluminum pan for the back seat.. It confrms
      to my bottom and is quiet comfy.. I did and it dropped me 1.5 inches. You might
      try and figure out how you can do it to the front pit. I have a cut out in
      the center section and that is where I anchor the front shoulder harness. It
      also gives the right angle. The aluminum pan is also suggested b Tony Bengelis.
      My center section fuel tank is 20.5 gallons and I drain from the front for flying
      downhill and a drain in the back for flying uphill. Both drains flow down
      with the tail on the ground to the gasculator. Cheers, Gardiner
      
      --- On Thu, 9/6/12, kevinpurtee <kevin.purtee@us.army.mil> wrote:
      
      > From: kevinpurtee <kevin.purtee@us.army.mil>
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: what I would do differently, wing spars and other
      things
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Date: Thursday, September 6, 2012, 11:48 AM
      > --> Pietenpol-List message posted
      > by: "kevinpurtee" <kevin.purtee@us.army.mil>
      > 
      > So Oscar, you know that despite the fact that I'm recovering
      > I can still kick your butt, right?:)
      > 
      > Just kidding, of course.
      > 
      > On the rebuild, we will do the following:
      > 
      > - 3 piece wing,
      > - Use a Gary Boothe fuel tank (~16 gallons),
      > - Move the fuel tank filler port forward a little for ease
      > of refueling,
      > - Probably use the lightweight fabric as Jack mentioned,
      > - Slant the back seat back a little as Jack mentioned,
      > - Figure out a way to make Shelley more comfortable in the
      > front seat, raise the seat, figure out better cushions,
      > whatever,
      > - Maybe raise the turtle deck an inch? We'll see,
      > - Use fittings at the top of the rear cabanes as an attach
      > point for the front seat shoulder harness attach cable vs.
      > the through-the-cabane eyebolts we used,
      > - Maybe use a head rest to raise the back seat shoulder
      > harness,
      > - I loved the brakes, but need to figure out a way to quit
      > popping spokes. May just use Jack's design.
      > We'll see,
      > - Maybe a cutout in the wing?
      > - Add a sump to the fuel tank, of course....
      > 
      > I loved the airplane and it performed nicely. These
      > are changes for convenience (except for the sump in the fuel
      > tank, of course...).
      > 
      > --------
      > Kevin "Axel" Purtee
      > NX899KP
      > Austin/San Marcos, TX
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382508#382508
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Email Forum -
      > - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
      > List Contribution Web Site -
      >        -Matt
      > Dralle, List Admin.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | First Flight of VH-XHE | 
      
      Excellent news, John and congratulations to Graham!  It'll be interesting to
      get the flight data from the Riblett, although with an O-235, a barn door
      would produce a good climb rate.
      
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      NX899JP
      
      Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      johnwoods@westnet.com.au
      Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 11:53 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: First Flight of VH-XHE
      
      
      Dear List,
      
      
      I am please to report that on Monday 27th August at 0700, Aircamper VH-XHE
      took first flight with builder Graham Hewitt, aged 84, at the controls.
      
      The 20 minute flight was completed safely at Jandakot airport in Western
      Australia.
      
      
      This morning, 9th Sept at 0700, Graham took to the skies for a second time
      completing two circuits and landing safely on the grass strip adjacent to
      the runway.
      
      
      Those of you who have been on the list for a while may remember Graham. He
      started the project about 7 years ago. The Pietenpol being his third
      homebuilt.
      
      Graham is a retired airline pilot with many thousands of hours flying single
      and multi engine conventional U/C aircraft and holds a low level aerobatic
      rating.
      
      
      Graham's Aircamper is the long fuselage variant with Riblette 612 aerofoil
      and powered by an O-235 Lycoming.
      
      
      The wing, incorporating built-up spars and Piper style landing gear
      construction are from Jim Wills plans. Graham has also incorporated a door
      for the front seat.
      
      Empty weight at 740lbs, initial flight reports indicate an excellent ROC and
      85 kts at 2500 RPM with a 68x45 prop and at 33 kts she was still flying but
      had a high ROD and wings stayed level.
      
      
      Initial flight problem was a nose heavy tendency possibly caused by wash-in
      at the tips of the stabiliser.
      
      This was corrected prior to the second flight however back stick was still
      required to keep the nose from dropping in level flight. To be resolved
      first before more extensive flight testing can continue.
      
      
      The wing is shifted back 2" from vertical and the CoG was with in range for
      the 612.
      
      
      See attached photo of VH-XHE resting after her second flight.
      
      
      Hopefully a video will be posted in time and I can provide updates as to
      flight performance, especially for those interested in the 612.
      
      
      Best regards,
      John Woods
      
      Perth, Western Australia
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flight of VH-XHE | 
      
      
      Thank you for the info John. pass along to Graham a hearty congrats on a beautiful
      airplane.
        there are around 10 or so (that i know of) who are planning, building, or flying
      with the riblett wing. more are probably contemplating the option. I've been
      gathering info about the setup but would love to get as much info as possible
      so that we all can have our riblett piets setup correctly the first time if
      at all possible. with that said, I'd like to request the following details.
      
      1.  are the fore and aft cabane struts the same length?  (angle of incidence)
      
      2.  what cg range is Graham using?
      
      3.  how much does he or who ever was flight testing weigh?
      
      4.  are the motor mounts extended beyond standard?
      
      5.  nose tank, wing tank, or both? and were they all filled for test flight?
      
      6. starter? battery location?
      
      any other questions or enlightened facts that fellow Riblett piet builders would
      like to pass along would also be helpful.
      
      Hopefully you guys down under can give us the down low. Thanks; Paul
      pauldonahuepilot(at)yahoo.com
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382749#382749
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flight of VH-XHE | 
      
      
      Oh yea; here's another;
      
      7.  did Graham build in any dihedral or washout? 
      
      
      Thanks; Paul
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382750#382750
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: what I would do differently, wing spars and other | 
      things
      
      
      @Oscar: at this point I couldn't catch you from 22 feet, much less 2200 miles.
      Also, you bring up good points about having an adult beverage in hand.  You're
      a practical guy.
      
      @Gardiner: thanks.  Good ideas.  Appreciate your thoughts.
      
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Kevin "Axel" Purtee
      NX899KP
      Austin/San Marcos, TX
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382751#382751
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions | 
      
      
      Thanks Tools!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382754#382754
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Joe
      
      You mean something like this?  One thing you learn after being involved with
      Pietenpol for a while is, if you can think of it someone already tried it.
      
      Chris
      Sacramento, Ca
      Westcoastpiet.com
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of JOSEPH
      SWITHIN
      Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 4:48 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: landing gear
      
      
      After looking at the Sky Scout and the Aircamper, today's question is: Would
      the landing gear used on the Sky Scout work on the Aircamper? Has anyone
      tried this, or is there a flaw/design issue that would not allow this to
      work?
      
      Joe Swithin
      Morris, IL
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions | 
      
      
      An exception I can think of is if you're making wood struts or something and designed
      those fittings differently than original and need the hole a little further
      away from the longeron or something.  
      
      Also, there's a BUNCH of fittings on the plans for brace wiring where the hole
      really isn't far enough away from the fuse to allow putting in the clevis pin
      in the correct orientation (ie from the top) or easily.  Knowing this ahead of
      time and making them a tad longer (sometimes as little as a 1/4") would make
      a world of difference.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382762#382762
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions | 
      
      
      
      kevinpurtee wrote:
      > When you take your hand drill and use a technique called "wallering" to get the
      bolts to go through...
      
      
      Man ain't this the truth!  In all fairness, will probably have to "waller" a bit
      less though.  
      
      waller (n. wall-er latin) 1. art of making bolts fit close tolerance holes 
      
      sp.  wallo, wallos, wallamos, wallas, wallan
      
      Is it too late to get this in the Tony B. glossary of homebuilding terms?
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382763#382763
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions | 
      
      
      You're just custom fitting each hole to the bolt....picking up the
      slack from the manufacturing tolerances....ahem
      
      Sent from my iPhone
      
      On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:45 PM, tools <n0kkj@yahoo.com> wrote:
      
      >
      >
      > kevinpurtee wrote:
      >> When you take your hand drill and use a technique called "wallering" to get
      the bolts to go through...
      >
      >
      > Man ain't this the truth!  In all fairness, will probably have to "waller" a
      bit less though.
      >
      > waller (n. wall-er latin) 1. art of making bolts fit close tolerance holes
      >
      > sp.  wallo, wallos, wallamos, wallas, wallan
      >
      > Is it too late to get this in the Tony B. glossary of homebuilding terms?
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382763#382763
      >
      >
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: landing gear | 
      
      
      Pietenwhatinthheckisthat?  I like his cargo pods on the lift struts, though.
      
      --------
      Billy McCaskill
      Baker, LA
      tail section almost done, starting on ribs soon
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382768#382768
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | First Flight of VH-XHE | 
      
      
      It is great to hear of all these success stories.  Gary in California=2C no
      w another new one.  Good stuff!!!  Mike Groah is back in the air with his i
      n California as well.  
      
      
      From: pietflyr@bellsouth.net
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: First Flight of VH-XHE
      
      
      Excellent news=2C John and congratulations to Graham!  It=92ll be interesti
      ng to get the flight data from the Riblett=2C although with an O-235=2C a b
      arn door would produce a good climb rate.
      
      Jack Phillips
      NX899JP
      Smith Mountain Lake=2C Virginia
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis
      t-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of johnwoods@westnet.com.au
      Sent: Sunday=2C September 09=2C 2012 11:53 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: First Flight of VH-XHE
      
      
      Dear List=2C
      
      
      I am please to report that on Monday 27th August at 0700=2C Aircamper VH-XH
      E took first flight with builder Graham Hewitt=2C aged 84=2C at the control
      s.
      
      The 20 minute flight was completed safely at Jandakot airport in Western Au
      stralia.
      
      
      This morning=2C 9th Sept at 0700=2C Graham took to the skies for a second t
      ime completing two circuits and landing safely on the grass strip adjacent 
      to the runway.
      
      
      Those of you who have been on the list for a while may remember Graham. He 
      started the project about 7 years ago. The Pietenpol being his third homebu
      ilt.
      
      Graham is a retired airline pilot with many thousands of hours flying singl
      e and multi engine conventional U/C aircraft and holds a low level aerobati
      c rating.
      
      
      Graham's Aircamper is the long fuselage variant with Riblette 612 aerofoil 
      and powered by an O-235 Lycoming.
      
      
      The wing=2C incorporating built-up spars and Piper style landing gear const
      ruction are from Jim Wills plans. Graham has also incorporated a door for t
      he front seat.
      
      Empty weight at 740lbs=2C initial flight reports indicate an excellent ROC 
      and 85 kts at 2500 RPM with a 68x45 prop and at 33 kts she was still flying
       but had a high ROD and wings stayed level.
      
      
      Initial flight problem was a nose heavy tendency possibly caused by wash-in
       at the tips of the stabiliser.
      
      This was corrected prior to the second flight however back stick was still 
      required to keep the nose from dropping in level flight. To be resolved fir
      st before more extensive flight testing can continue.
      
      
      The wing is shifted back 2" from vertical and the CoG was with in range for
       the 612.
      
      
      See attached photo of VH-XHE resting after her second flight.
      
      
      Hopefully a video will be posted in time and I can provide updates as to fl
      ight performance=2C especially for those interested in the 612.
      
      
      Best regards=2C
      John Woods
      
      Perth=2C Western Australia
      
      
       		 	   		  
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions | 
      
      
      Actually when I was working at General Dynamics, I learned that the correct
      terminology is to "Obligate" the hole, so that it's obligated to accept the
      bolt.
      
      Jack Phillips
      NX899JP
      Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of tools
      Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 4:41 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions
      
      
      
      kevinpurtee wrote:
      > When you take your hand drill and use a technique called "wallering" to
      get the bolts to go through...
      
      
      Man ain't this the truth!  In all fairness, will probably have to "waller" a
      bit less though.  
      
      waller (n. wall-er latin) 1. art of making bolts fit close tolerance holes 
      
      sp.  wallo, wallos, wallamos, wallas, wallan
      
      Is it too late to get this in the Tony B. glossary of homebuilding terms?
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382763#382763
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: landing gear | 
      
      
      Billy,
      
      I believe "the ordnance" are actually small cargo compartments.
      
      
      --------
      Semper Fi,
      
      Terry Hand
      Athens, GA
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382773#382773
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | bottom fitting plate | 
      
      On pg. 3 of the plans in the lower left corner =9Cbottom fitting 
      plate=9D that goes on the bottom of the fuselage. My question: 
      should the 5/16=9D holes be 28 3/4=9D apart, as that would 
      be the center to center width of the wing spars?
         
      
      
      Dennis
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions | 
      
      
      Check out the RV-10 list sometime.  What a bunch of whiners!
      
      Jack Phillips
      NX899JP
      Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Roberts
      Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 12:52 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions
      
      
      Hey guys, slightly off topic, but I am really impressed and grateful to be a
      part of this list.... Let me BRIEFLY (I tend to ramble) explain:
      
      Looked for years to decided what to build. Didn't look at the support groups
      or lists like this to determine what to build, but I should have. I have a
      link directly to this list that I use to log in. Tonight I had to log on via
      the forums.matronics.com site and navigate to this group. On the way I
      slowly scrolled through the main page of groups to see what other groups are
      active. I had NO idea that this group was far away the most active and
      helpful! Have you guys seen the difference in the amount of posts here
      versus the other popular builds? I was very surprised and very pleased.
      
      You know, it could be somewhat intimidating to see how much this forum is
      read, but you guys make it so comfortable to ask a question, and are so
      supportive and non-cliquish that I haven't thought about asking a question
      or two. I'd like to again say thanks for the help.
      
      So I'll be ordering a scotch-brite wheel soon. But until then, I sure
      appreciate the advice and moral support. I hope I can afford a Brodhead trip
      next year!
      
      Mark
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382715#382715
      
      
Message 23
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flight of VH-XHE | 
      
      
      List, 
      
      A correction to my report on Graham's engine of choice. 
      
      It is a Continental O-200. 
      
      To those with inquiring minds, I will pass the questions on to Graham for answers.
      
      
      
      Best regards, 
      > John Woods 
      
      
      Perth , Western Australia 
      
      
      > 
      
Message 24
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions | 
      
      
      Hey guys, slightly off topic, but I am really impressed and grateful to be a part
      of this list.... Let me BRIEFLY (I tend to ramble) explain:
      
      Looked for years to decided what to build. Didn't look at the support groups or
      lists like this to determine what to build, but I should have. I have a link
      directly to this list that I use to log in. Tonight I had to log on via the forums.matronics.com
      site and navigate to this group. On the way I slowly scrolled
      through the main page of groups to see what other groups are active. I had
      NO idea that this group was far away the most active and helpful! Have you guys
      seen the difference in the amount of posts here versus the other popular builds?
      I was very surprised and very pleased.
      
      You know, it could be somewhat intimidating to see how much this forum is read,
      but you guys make it so comfortable to ask a question, and are so supportive
      and non-cliquish that I haven't thought about asking a question or two. I'd like
      to again say thanks for the help.
      
      So I'll be ordering a scotch-brite wheel soon. But until then, I sure appreciate
      the advice and moral support. I hope I can afford a Brodhead trip next year!
      
      Mark
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382782#382782
      
      
Message 25
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | bottom fitting plate | 
      
      That's how I installed mine.
      
      Chris
      Sacramento, Ca
      Westcoastpiet.com
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
      Engelkenjohn
      Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 5:43 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: bottom fitting plate
      
      
      On pg. 3 of the plans in the lower left corner "bottom fitting plate" that
      goes on the bottom of the fuselage. My question: should the 5/16" holes be
      28 3/4" apart, as that would be the center to center width of the wing
      spars?
         
      
      
      Dennis
      
      
Message 26
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flight of VH-XHE | 
      
      
      She's a beauty, mate!  Glad to hear that the first flights have been safe and successful
      so far.  Carry on!
      
      It will be of great interest to all on this list to hear how the airplane handles
      and performs with the Riblett.  The more data that can be carefully acquired
      while flight testing, the better.  In fact, I'll bet that Doc Mosher would welcome
      a semi-technical article for the BPA Newsletter on performance with the
      Riblett vs. the tried-and-true Pietenpol wing.  In this case, the best comparison
      would be between O-200 powered Piets, but any data would be good.  Stall
      speed, cruise speed, time to climb, speed vs. RPM, trim force required.  Input!
      Data points!  Once the initial rigging tweaks are made and the test pilot is
      comfortable with the airplane, it would be nice to see data start coming in.
      
      I note that the aileron horns have lightening holes in them, thus I assume that
      they were not fabricated as hollow airfoil shapes as the plans call for, but
      rather from flat metal stock.  Are they aluminum?
      
      Cheers!
      
      --------
      Oscar Zuniga
      Medford/Ashland, OR
      Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
      A75 power
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=382783#382783
      
      
Message 27
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Flight of VH-XHE?????// | 
      
      hi Oscar were I cand see these video jorge from hanford=0A=0A=0AFrom: taild
      rags <taildrags@hotmail.com>=0ATo: pietenpol-list@matronics.com =0ASent: Su
      nday, September 9, 2012 9:37 PM=0ASubject: Pietenpol-List: Re: First Flight
      s@hotmail.com>=0A=0AShe's a beauty, mate!- Glad to hear that the first fl
      ights have been safe and successful so far.- Carry on!=0A=0AIt will be of
       great interest to all on this list to hear how the airplane handles and pe
      rforms with the Riblett.- The more data that can be carefully acquired wh
      ile flight testing, the better.- In fact, I'll bet that Doc Mosher would 
      welcome a semi-technical article for the BPA Newsletter on performance with
       the Riblett vs. the tried-and-true Pietenpol wing.- In this case, the be
      st comparison would be between O-200 powered Piets, but any data would be g
      ood.- Stall speed, cruise speed, time to climb, speed vs. RPM, trim force
       required.- Input!- Data points!- Once the initial rigging tweaks are
       made and the test pilot is comfortable with the airplane, it would be nice
       to see data start coming in.=0A=0AI note that the aileron horns have light
      ening holes in them, thus I assume that they were not fabricated as hollow 
      airfoil shapes as the plans call for, but rather from flat metal stock.- 
      Are they aluminum?=0A=0ACheers!=0A=0A--------=0AOscar Zuniga=0AMedford/Ashl
      and, OR=0AAir Camper NX41CC "Scout"=0AA75 power=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ARea
      d this topic online here:=0A=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p
      =========================0A
      ==
      
Message 28
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steel Fittings and Prep questions | 
      
      
      I vote for this one!
      I bet they used it on sailing ships when the
      gronicle just refused to fit the binnicle gimp.
      
      Clif
      The Early Bird may get the worm but the second
      mouse gets the cheese.
      
      
      >
      > Actually when I was working at General Dynamics, I learned that the 
      > correct
      > terminology is to "Obligate" the hole, so that it's obligated to accept 
      > the
      > bolt.
      >
      > Jack Phillips
      > NX899JP
      > Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |