Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:25 AM - Re: Oh, I'm still here.... (echobravo4)
2. 03:29 AM - Re: Covering control horn bolts, yes or no (tools)
3. 03:45 AM - Re: Re: Covering control horn bolts, yes or no (Jack)
4. 04:03 AM - Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates (nightmare)
5. 06:43 AM - Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates (Michael Perez)
6. 07:40 AM - Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates (jarheadpilot82)
7. 07:53 AM - engine choice (proplock)
8. 08:07 AM - Re: engine choice (John Hofmann)
9. 08:16 AM - Re: Seatbelts (woodflier)
10. 08:34 AM - Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates (Jack)
11. 08:42 AM - Re: Tore Down my engine! (AircamperN11MS)
12. 09:07 AM - inter-cylinder baffles (Douwe Blumberg)
13. 09:14 AM - Re: inter-cylinder baffles (AircamperN11MS)
14. 09:40 AM - Re: TIG Welder (scudrun)
15. 09:50 AM - Re: TIG Welder (scudrun)
16. 09:53 AM - Re: engine choice (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC])
17. 09:57 AM - Re: inter-cylinder baffles (Jack Phillips)
18. 10:09 AM - Re: inter-cylinder baffles (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC])
19. 10:10 AM - Re: inter-cylinder baffles (tkreiner)
20. 10:45 AM - Neil Royer (dwilson)
21. 11:17 AM - Re: Tore Down my engine! (tkreiner)
22. 11:28 AM - Re: Tore Down my engine! (AircamperN11MS)
23. 11:31 AM - Re: inter-cylinder baffles (AircamperN11MS)
24. 11:33 AM - Re: inter-cylinder baffles (AircamperN11MS)
25. 12:27 PM - Re: Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates (Michael Perez)
26. 12:29 PM - Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates (Michael Perez)
27. 12:37 PM - Re: Re: TIG Welder (George Abernathy)
28. 01:45 PM - Re: TIG Welder (scudrun)
29. 01:46 PM - Re: inter-cylinder baffles (Jack Phillips)
30. 01:58 PM - Re: Re: Tore Down my engine! (Jack Phillips)
31. 04:39 PM - Re: Shoulder Harness (skipgadd@earthlink.net)
32. 06:05 PM - Re: Re: Shoulder Harness (Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB)
33. 07:47 PM - Re: Shoulder Harness (Ohbejoyful)
34. 07:53 PM - Re: Re: Covering control horn bolts, yes or no (Clif Dawson)
35. 08:32 PM - Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates (tools)
36. 09:49 PM - Re: engine choice (Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB)
37. 10:06 PM - Re: Shoulder Harness (Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Oh, I'm still here.... |
Keep at it Jim
I know that Paint program can be challenging! ;)
--------
Earl Brown
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I
intended to be.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394643#394643
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Covering control horn bolts, yes or no |
Wood shrinkage can allow a through bolt to become loose, all the while the nut
never moving and remaining tightly in place on the bolt.
I've seen this on my plane.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394644#394644
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Covering control horn bolts, yes or no |
Yes...on my tale surfaces which were torqued a couple years ago, all bolts
for the hinges took one to two turns to tighten up before covering...
Jack Textor
Des Moines, IA
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of tools
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 5:29 AM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Covering control horn bolts, yes or no
Wood shrinkage can allow a through bolt to become loose, all the while the
nut never moving and remaining tightly in place on the bolt.
I've seen this on my plane.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394644#394644
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates |
Tools; great to hear that others are actually torch welding aluminum. on a previous
thread i had mentioned how i planned on welding my tank with a torch, but
didnt want to recommend it to someone just learning since most on the welding
forums seem to claim that its not worth trying.
do you remember what gas and aluminum they were using? i've got acetylene and
5052 aluminum. Sorry for borrowing thread. Paul
--------
Paul Donahue
Started 8-3-12
do not archive
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394647#394647
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates |
An alternative to threading.
Michael Perez
Pietenpol HINT Videos
Karetaker Aero
www.karetakeraero.com
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates |
Michael,
Very cool, very clean look for your axle cap. One question though- what are you
doing in place of safety wiring the hex nut? What are you doing to keep it from
"backing out"? Just curious.
Did you mill the cap your self?
P.S. Oops. That makes 2 questions.
--------
Semper Fi,
Terry Hand
Athens, GA
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394661#394661
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Got a situation here, read on the UK site , 65 continental may be under powered
for a Piet,seems they advise 85 or 0-200. Any thoughts? Corvair ?
--------
A remarkable lad , capable of many things
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394663#394663
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: engine choice |
Keep it light. 502Rocket is not underpowered with an A-65. It performs a
bit better than my Cub with an A-75.
John Hofmann
Vice-President, Information Technology
The Rees Group, Inc.
2424 American Lane
Madison, WI 53704
Phone: 608.443.2468 ext 150
Fax: 608.443.2474
Email: jhofmann@reesgroupinc.com
On Feb 20, 2013, at 9:53 AM, proplock wrote:
<proplock@federatedwildblue.com>
>
> Got a situation here, read on the UK site , 65 continental may be
under powered for a Piet,seems they advise 85 or 0-200. Any thoughts?
Corvair ?
>
> --------
> A remarkable lad , capable of many things
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394663#394663
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Joseph, there are many varying views on shoulder harness location and attac
hment points. Look at as many variations as you can and decide what works f
or you. I oped to go with raising the attach point above the turtledeck so
that the harness would not pull down on my shoulders in the event of a sudd
en stop. I built a steel tube frame that attaches to the top longerons that
the harness attaches to, and ran 1/8" cables from the tailwheel attach pla
te to the aft end of that frame to take the load. That additional structure
is covered by a simple aluminum fairing and the whole setup is supposed to
resemble the headrests seen on WWI fighters.
Here are some pics:
Matt Paxton
NX629ML
***********************
From: Ohbejoyful <ohbejoyful10@gmail.com>
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Shoulder Harness
I am considering putting shoulder harnesses in my Pietenpol.
Does anyone have any ideas as to the best anchor point for the shoulder har
ness
for the rear seat? Also what hardware have you found best to mount to the
structure?
Thanks,
Joseph
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates |
Michael a show plane for sure, outstanding work!
Sent from my iPad
Jack Textor
On Feb 20, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Michael Perez <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> An alternative to threading.
>
> Michael Perez
> Pietenpol HINT Videos
> Karetaker Aero
> www.karetakeraero.com
>
> <Axle Cap.jpg>
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Tore Down my engine! |
Tom,
Take a good look at the prop flange if you are going to use the GPU crank. You
will notice that one of the six bolt holes is drilled off center. It will need
to be re-drilled to to relocate it, I believe the other holes will also need
to be drill to accept the prop bolt bushings. It will work. Dad has converted
several of these for aircraft use. The cylinder are different too. They
are set up for a down draft carburetor whereas an aircraft engine is set up for
updraft. You got those for a very good price and there are many usable parts
in them. Just make sure the parts you choose are compatible.
Regards,
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394669#394669
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | inter-cylinder baffles |
Hey all,
During some great visits with Gardiner (Thanks my friend for you and your
lovely wife's southern hospitality!), Jeff and Terry, the subject of
inter-cylinder baffling came up.
As I've mentioned, I was hoping not to have to use cooling eyebrows, but my
winter cht temps were too high so I just finished installing some eyebrows.
Do I need to also install some baffling between the cylinders? I don't
think cubs have any, and I think most of the installations I've seen at
Brodhead don't, but I could be wrong.
Would appreciate your input.
Thanks
Douwe
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: inter-cylinder baffles |
I don't have any on my C-85. Been that way for 41 years. No problems yet.
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394671#394671
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
John Francis wrote:
> Using the thoriated rods, a full time welder will be exposed to less than 100
millerems of radiation in a year. Another web source says a welder is exposed
to 16 millerems a year. We naturally absorb about 300 millerems a year by just
being here on planet earth. The occupational safety limit is 5,000 per year.
A radioactive iodine solution to treat a thyroid will expose you to 10,000,000
millerems of radiation.
>
> I wear a dusk mask when I sharpen them.
>
> I found these numbers on the internet so take them as you may.
Well I don't like to tell people what to think or do, but when you read about radiation
exposure levels keep in mind that there is a big difference between standing
next to something which is hot (radioactive) and receiving a dose of rays,
versus having a nuclear isotope lodged in your body nuking those nearby cells
over and over and....
Decide for yourselves.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394673#394673
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Here is a shot of a 1/16" zirconiated rod I chemically sharpened.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394674#394674
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/sharpened_with_sodium_nitrite_196.jpg
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I agree with John H. that a 65 Continental engine is plenty of power for a
lightly-built Pietenpol Air Camper. If you're
in a very high/hot location then that may not be the case and you may need
more power like the Rick Holland's and
Ken Bickers of Colorado.
If you plan to build a full electric Pietenpol or a GN-1 with lots of goodi
es and extra weight you probably will want to consider more power
like a 75, or up Continental powered engine. (or auto engine of your choic
e). (and a metal prop or a good wood Cloudcars prop that lots
of guys are getting good performance out of on Piets)
Mike C.
Ohio
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | inter-cylinder baffles |
Douwe,
I originally did not include the inter-cylinder baffles on my A65. When I
had a stuck piston ring, I sent an email to Harry Fenton, who is the "guru"
for small Continentals. He asked if I had the baffles, and when I said no,
he said that every case he's seen of stuck piston rings was due to high
cylinder head temps, and invariably there was no baffling. He strongly
recommended I add them, which I have done. I think I still have the
drawings he sent me showing how to do it. I'll look for them and send them
to you.
Jack Phillips
NX899JP
Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
_____
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Douwe
Blumberg
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:08 PM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: inter-cylinder baffles
Hey all,
During some great visits with Gardiner (Thanks my friend for you and your
lovely wife's southern hospitality!), Jeff and Terry, the subject of
inter-cylinder baffling came up.
As I've mentioned, I was hoping not to have to use cooling eyebrows, but my
winter cht temps were too high so I just finished installing some eyebrows.
Do I need to also install some baffling between the cylinders? I don't
think cubs have any, and I think most of the installations I've seen at
Brodhead don't, but I could be wrong.
Would appreciate your input.
Thanks
Douwe
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | inter-cylinder baffles |
I'd concur Dowe with Jack and Harry Fenton. I believe the Bingelis books s
how diagrams or sketches of those baffles
and they aren't hard to make up of scrap aluminum, springs, and a piece of
welding rod or wire.
I have a set in my airport desk drawer that I have to reinstall this spring
. Thanks for the reminder. (had them out for maintenance)
Mike C.
Here's a good description with sketches on how to make these puppies.
http://www.bowersflybaby.com/tech/intercylinder_baffles_343.pdf
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: inter-cylinder baffles |
There's a great article on the subject of inter cylinder baffles, which I'm attaching.
Enjoy...
--------
Tom Kreiner
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394679#394679
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/intercylinder_oiltank_baff_247_210.pdf
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
This is kind of an interesting story about a local Aircamper.
http://www.kvue.com/news/90-year-old-is-building-model-plane-165261146.html
Dan
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394682#394682
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Tore Down my engine! |
Scott,
Thanks for the input! There is a guy here in the Houston area, Dirk Kretschman,
who wrote this article:
http://www.eaa.org/experimenter/articles/2009-04_vp2.asp
and after reading the article, I tracked Dirk down, and got all of the AN manuals
on the engine along with the LAA conversion notes to turn the engine into an
aircraft engine. As I won't be using the PC-60 case, I'm only using part of
the conversion notes.
Like you mentioned, the crank flange does need to be drilled, and the centerline
of one hole needs to be relocated by a small amount. This is clearly described
in the LAA article.
After disassembly, I've found that the crank mikes within the NEW LIMITS shown
in the C & O Series overhaul manuals, and many of the other parts are good, as
well. I've agreed to trade the old PC-60 case and camshaft for a C-90 camshaft,
and so, I'll have nearly a C-90 stuffed into a C-85 case.
If you recall from my first post, along with this stuff, I got 4 chrome plated
O-200 cylinders, which have no detectable wear. Lacking, however, are the intake
manifolds, spider, and several other items. Also needed are pistons and rings.
The C-85 Crankcase that came with the package has some fretting on the center main
flange faces - those adjacent to the bearing bores. MY guess is that I'll
have to send the case out, and have it faced to clean up, then linebored for
mains and camshaft. OR am I overlooking something?
At the moment, I'm cleaning all the parts, and contemplating who or where to send
the case to for repair.
Several months ago, a guy came to me with an aircraft tug that needed repair, which
I completed in trade for two 100 hr. old Slick mags to fit the engine, with
gears and impulse couplings.
So, the list of stuff I have for the engine is growing, but I still need several
items. I'm not sure what's more fun, the engine work, or scrounging for parts...
My total cost to date for the engine stuff is $352.00, not including a
few shipping costs...
--------
Tom Kreiner
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394684#394684
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Tore Down my engine! |
Tom,
Great article. Sounds like you have it under control. It is fun to scrounge for
parts. That is how we built my plane. There was no aircraft spruce back
in the day. Anyway, Contact me at the email address below and I will give you
my dads email address. He may have some of the engine parts you require. He
has a lot of cont. stuff. Good luck with your hunting.
scott.liefeld@lacity.org
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394685#394685
Message 23
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: inter-cylinder baffles |
Douwe,
Do get me wrong. It is recommended that you have the baffles. I'm just saying
that my plane has been fine without them.
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394686#394686
Message 24
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: inter-cylinder baffles |
Opps, I meant Don't get me wrong. My typing fingers had a mis-fire.
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394687#394687
Message 25
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates |
The nut is a plastic stop nut. You could put a castle nut as well. I should
take a picture of the underside. The nut is slightly recessed as well.
-
Yes, machined myself.
Michael Perez
Pietenpol HINT Videos
Karetaker Aero
www.karetakeraero.com
Message 26
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates |
Thank you Jack. If I had the time, I would mass produce parts for other fly
ers and provide custom maching as well.- Someday...
Michael Perez
Pietenpol HINT Videos
Karetaker Aero
www.karetakeraero.com
Message 27
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I did try turning the darkness knob.- It didn't help. Must be the chinese
ly welder. =0A=0A=0AThe sodium nitrite is on its way. It costs 33.00 and fr
eight was 66.00. I asked the supplier if they delivered it wearing hazmat s
uits. =0A=0A=0AGotta go the black helicopters are landing. =0A=0A=0A=0A____
____________________________=0A From: Bkemike <bkemike@gmail.com>=0ATo: "pi
etenpol-list@matronics.com" <pietenpol-list@matronics.com> =0ASent: Wednesd
ay, February 20, 2013 12:18 PM=0ASubject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: TIG Welde
r=0A =0A=0AI also have a Harbor Freight auto-darkening helmet. It was way t
oo dark until I adjusted the darkness from 13 to 9. It now works perfectly
with my Miller Diversion 180 TIG.=0AMike Hardaway=0A=0ASent from an Apple i
Thingie.=0A=0A=0AOn Feb 19, 2013, at 4:53 PM, George Abernathy <avionixoz@y
ahoo.com> wrote:=0A=0A=0AThe chemical sharpening is supposed to do a better
job smoothness wise. =0A>=0A>Besides I have already filled in the form and
emailed it. =0A>=0A>I discovered that I couldn't see the puddle with my 15
year old harbor freight auto darkening helmet. So I bought a miller super
gee whiz bang titanium helmet. It is an amazing piece of gear. It has setti
ngs for all sorts of stuff. Even one for grinding. =0A>=0A>-=0A>[snip]=0A
=================
Message 28
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
WHAT! That's a hundred bucks! I was suggesting buying it through a chemical supply
because it should cost a lot LESS than buying chemsharp. Couldn't you go
to the local university and buy some from the chem lab? 20 bucks should buy you
enough to last a lifetime. I'm not trying to make you feel bad, I just wish
you would have said something about those numbers before pulling the trigger!
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394703#394703
Message 29
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | inter-cylinder baffles |
Good job, Mike! Those are the same drawings Harry sent me, that I was
looking for to send to Douwe. Thanks for saving me the trouble.
Jack Phillips
NX899JP
Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
_____
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael
D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: inter-cylinder baffles
I'd concur Dowe with Jack and Harry Fenton. I believe the Bingelis books
show diagrams or sketches of those baffles
and they aren't hard to make up of scrap aluminum, springs, and a piece of
welding rod or wire.
I have a set in my airport desk drawer that I have to reinstall this spring.
Thanks for the reminder. (had them out for maintenance)
Mike C.
Here's a good description with sketches on how to make these puppies.
http://www.bowersflybaby.com/tech/intercylinder_baffles_343.pdf
Message 30
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Tore Down my engine! |
Tom,
I recommend sending your crankcase to Divco to overhaul it. They'll mill
the faces flat, then line bore the crankshaft and camshaft. I had them do
my A65 when I rebuilt it and it has never leaked a drop of oil around the
crankcase seal.
Good luck!
Jack Phillips
NX899JP
Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of tkreiner
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:17 PM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Tore Down my engine!
Scott,
Thanks for the input! There is a guy here in the Houston area, Dirk
Kretschman, who wrote this article:
http://www.eaa.org/experimenter/articles/2009-04_vp2.asp
and after reading the article, I tracked Dirk down, and got all of the AN
manuals on the engine along with the LAA conversion notes to turn the engine
into an aircraft engine. As I won't be using the PC-60 case, I'm only using
part of the conversion notes.
Like you mentioned, the crank flange does need to be drilled, and the
centerline of one hole needs to be relocated by a small amount. This is
clearly described in the LAA article.
After disassembly, I've found that the crank mikes within the NEW LIMITS
shown in the C & O Series overhaul manuals, and many of the other parts are
good, as well. I've agreed to trade the old PC-60 case and camshaft for a
C-90 camshaft, and so, I'll have nearly a C-90 stuffed into a C-85 case.
If you recall from my first post, along with this stuff, I got 4 chrome
plated O-200 cylinders, which have no detectable wear. Lacking, however,
are the intake manifolds, spider, and several other items. Also needed are
pistons and rings.
The C-85 Crankcase that came with the package has some fretting on the
center main flange faces - those adjacent to the bearing bores. MY guess is
that I'll have to send the case out, and have it faced to clean up, then
linebored for mains and camshaft. OR am I overlooking something?
At the moment, I'm cleaning all the parts, and contemplating who or where to
send the case to for repair.
Several months ago, a guy came to me with an aircraft tug that needed
repair, which I completed in trade for two 100 hr. old Slick mags to fit the
engine, with gears and impulse couplings.
So, the list of stuff I have for the engine is growing, but I still need
several items. I'm not sure what's more fun, the engine work, or
scrounging for parts... My total cost to date for the engine stuff is
$352.00, not including a few shipping costs...
--------
Tom Kreiner
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394684#394684
Message 31
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Shoulder Harness |
Joseph,
Attached shows how I did my front and pilot pits. Keep in mind this Piet
has not been off the ground.
The 7/16 picture shows the 2nd or 3rd practice instrument board, I have
since moved the engine instruments to the right and the mag switch to the
left, because when starting my Grega I am always standing at the prop or on
the left side.
Skip
> [Original Message]
> From: Ohbejoyful <ohbejoyful10@gmail.com>
> To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
> Date: 2/19/2013 8:35:12 PM
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Shoulder Harness
>
>
> I am considering putting shoulder harnesses in my Pietenpol.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas as to the best anchor point for the shoulder
harness for the rear seat? Also what hardware have you found best to mount
to the structure?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joseph
>
>
Message 32
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Shoulder Harness |
I like it. I am a BIG believer in Shoulder harnesses.
Much research and discussion on adding shoulder harnesses on the Beech list taught
me the following.
1. There are a lot of deaths and serious head injuries that happen when heads hit
instrument panels.
FAA numbers say using shoulder belts in small aircraft would reduce major injuries
by 88% and fatalities by 20%
2. If you put shoulder attach points too low they add to back compression injuries.
3. One cross chest harness is much better than nothing probably 75 % as good as
a double harness. though you can have torso twisting is an issue.
4. Double harnesses are best, attached just about the level of the base of your
skull. coming straight
5. The setup is as strong as the weakest link.
6. Certified aircraft guys covet the experimental ability to use good quality auto
seatbelts.
It is important enough that the FAA has allowed GA certified aircraft to put seatbelts
in with only a log entry. the only restriction is that the belts themselves
are FAA approved ($) and that they are put in similar to approved setups.
I ended up putting single non retractable shoulder harnesses in my Vtail Bonanza
the same way that shoulder harnesses were put in from 1948 to 1956. The attach
point had become a hangon strap.
Beechcraft Shoulder harnesses were offered as an option in the late 1940s and early
1950s, but Beech dropped them for until the late 1950s because none sold!
No one wanted them. Remember, cars in the 1950s did not have lap belts.
I could not afford the $1500 per seat certified retractable dual shoulder harness.
I will figure out how to mount rear shoulder belts in my Vtail.
I will reinstall the harness in the Piet to get it flying. Then I will evaluate
where it rides on me and pax.
Now I will get off my soap box.
Blue Skies,
Steve D
----- Original Message -----
From: "skipgadd@earthlink.net" <skipgadd@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Shoulder Harness
> Joseph,
> Attached shows how I did my front and pilot pits. Keep in mind this
> Piethas not been off the ground.
> The 7/16 picture shows the 2nd or 3rd practice instrument board, I
> havesince moved the engine instruments to the right and the mag
> switch to the
> left, because when starting my Grega I am always standing at the
> prop or on
> the left side.
> Skip
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Ohbejoyful <
> > To: <
> > Date: 2/19/2013 8:35:12 PM
> > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Shoulder Harness
> >
> >
> > I am considering putting shoulder harnesses in my Pietenpol.
> >
> > Does anyone have any ideas as to the best anchor point for the shoulder
> harness for the rear seat? Also what hardware have you found best to mount
> to the structure?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joseph
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Message 33
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Shoulder Harness |
Since I do not have the turtleback in yet, I'm thinking I will go mostly with the
attach points for the rear seat as shown in the British plans. Is this a good
idea?
Thanks,
Joseph
On Feb 20, 2013, at 8:04 PM, "Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB" <steven.d.dortch@us.army.mil>
wrote:
>
> I like it. I am a BIG believer in Shoulder harnesses.
>
> Much research and discussion on adding shoulder harnesses on the Beech list taught
me the following.
>
> 1. There are a lot of deaths and serious head injuries that happen when heads
hit instrument panels.
> FAA numbers say using shoulder belts in small aircraft would reduce major injuries
by 88% and fatalities by 20%
> 2. If you put shoulder attach points too low they add to back compression injuries.
> 3. One cross chest harness is much better than nothing probably 75 % as good
as a double harness. though you can have torso twisting is an issue.
> 4. Double harnesses are best, attached just about the level of the base of your
skull. coming straight
> 5. The setup is as strong as the weakest link.
> 6. Certified aircraft guys covet the experimental ability to use good quality
auto seatbelts.
>
> It is important enough that the FAA has allowed GA certified aircraft to put
seatbelts in with only a log entry. the only restriction is that the belts themselves
are FAA approved ($) and that they are put in similar to approved setups.
>
> I ended up putting single non retractable shoulder harnesses in my Vtail Bonanza
the same way that shoulder harnesses were put in from 1948 to 1956. The attach
point had become a hangon strap.
>
> Beechcraft Shoulder harnesses were offered as an option in the late 1940s and
early 1950s, but Beech dropped them for until the late 1950s because none sold!
No one wanted them. Remember, cars in the 1950s did not have lap belts.
>
> I could not afford the $1500 per seat certified retractable dual shoulder harness.
I will figure out how to mount rear shoulder belts in my Vtail.
>
> I will reinstall the harness in the Piet to get it flying. Then I will evaluate
where it rides on me and pax.
>
> Now I will get off my soap box.
>
> Blue Skies,
> Steve D
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "skipgadd@earthlink.net" <skipgadd@earthlink.net>
> Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 18:55
> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Shoulder Harness
> To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
>
>
>> Joseph,
>> Attached shows how I did my front and pilot pits. Keep in mind this
>> Piethas not been off the ground.
>> The 7/16 picture shows the 2nd or 3rd practice instrument board, I
>> havesince moved the engine instruments to the right and the mag
>> switch to the
>> left, because when starting my Grega I am always standing at the
>> prop or on
>> the left side.
>> Skip
>>
>>
>>> [Original Message]
>>> From: Ohbejoyful <
>>> To: <
>>> Date: 2/19/2013 8:35:12 PM
>>> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Shoulder Harness
>>>
>>>
>>> I am considering putting shoulder harnesses in my Pietenpol.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any ideas as to the best anchor point for the shoulder
>> harness for the rear seat? Also what hardware have you found best to mount
>> to the structure?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Joseph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Message 34
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Covering control horn bolts, yes or no |
Are they covered or open to the elements.?
Clif
>
> Yes...on my tale surfaces which were torqued a couple years ago, all bolts
> for the hinges took one to two turns to tighten up before covering...
>
> Jack Textor
> Des Moines, IA
>
>
>
> Wood shrinkage can allow a through bolt to become loose, all the while the
> nut never moving and remaining tightly in place on the bolt.
>
> I've seen this on my plane.
Message 35
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Axle Threading / TIG Welder sources, rates |
This is a busy thread!
Can't remember the alloy, but they showed oxy/acet as well as oxy/hydrogen? There
were compromises with each, and I leaned towards just oxy/acet because I'm
already set up. If I weren't the hydrogen thing was pretty cool.
I've also played around with alum welding with oxy/acet with the henrob/dillion
torch and that's usually all 1000 series stuff, the advantage over tig being
it's annealed and workable.
The seminar at oshkosh was all standard smith style torch stuff, with a readily
available flux (which may be the same as the propietary henrob stuff, don't really
know).
Ultimately, the real advantage seemed to be that the oxy/acet rig just becomes
MORE versatile knowing how to do it. Like anything, it's a matter of burning
up some gas and aluminum while just learning to assimilate what's happening through
practice.
The most counterintuitive thing was that when things were getting fast, and you
wanted to slow down to let your brain catch up, the natural thing to do is pull
the torch back... WRONG... the heat cone is bigger and you just melt a big
hole. What needs to be done is to feed more filler rod, which cools the puddle
and slows things down. Sounds simple enough...
Tools
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394724#394724
Message 36
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: engine choice |
I have heard that the C90 is considered by many to be the best of the breed.
Blue Skies,
Steve D
----- Original Message -----
From: proplock <proplock@federatedwildblue.com>
Subject: Pietenpol-List: engine choice
>
> Got a situation here, read on the UK site , 65 continental may be under powered
for a Piet,seems they advise 85 or 0-200. Any thoughts? Corvair ?
>
> --------
> A remarkable lad , capable of many things
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=394663#394663
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 37
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Shoulder Harness |
IMHO BIKIAR
Better than nothing, I would put them as high as is reasonable. To be honest, a
compressed spine is better than dain bramage.
I am going to get mine flying as it was built with them through the upper seat
back. Getting flying is important to me.
Then I will possibly add a turtledeck just high enough to put them where I want
them (and look cool) being safe is also important. This is just added safety.
Blue Skies,
Steve D
----- Original Message -----
From: Ohbejoyful <ohbejoyful10@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Shoulder Harness
>
> Since I do not have the turtleback in yet, I'm thinking I will go mostly with
the attach points for the rear seat as shown in the British
> plans. Is this a good idea?
>
> Thanks,
> Joseph
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2013, at 8:04 PM, "Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB" < wrote:
>
> >
> > I like it. I am a BIG believer in Shoulder harnesses.
> >
> > Much research and discussion on adding shoulder harnesses on the Beech list
taught me the following.
> >
> > 1. There are a lot of deaths and serious head injuries that happen when heads
hit instrument panels.
> > FAA numbers say using shoulder belts in small aircraft would reduce major injuries
by 88% and fatalities by 20%
> > 2. If you put shoulder attach points too low they add to back compression injuries.
> > 3. One cross chest harness is much better than nothing probably 75 % as good
as a double harness. though you can have torso twisting is an issue.
> > 4. Double harnesses are best, attached just about the level of the base of
your skull. coming straight
> > 5. The setup is as strong as the weakest link.
> > 6. Certified aircraft guys covet the experimental ability to use good quality
auto seatbelts.
> >
> > It is important enough that the FAA has allowed GA certified aircraft to put
seatbelts in with only a log entry. the only restriction is that the belts themselves
are FAA approved ($) and that they are put in similar to approved setups.
> >
> > I ended up putting single non retractable shoulder harnesses in my Vtail Bonanza
the same way that shoulder harnesses were put in from 1948 to 1956. The
attach point had become a hangon strap.
> >
> > Beechcraft Shoulder harnesses were offered as an option in the late 1940s and
early 1950s, but Beech dropped them for until the late 1950s because none sold!
No one wanted them. Remember, cars in the 1950s did not have lap belts.
> >
> > I could not afford the $1500 per seat certified retractable dual shoulder harness.
I will figure out how to mount rear shoulder belts in my Vtail.
> >
> > I will reinstall the harness in the Piet to get it flying. Then I will evaluate
where it rides on me and pax.
> >
> > Now I will get off my soap box.
> >
> > Blue Skies,
> > Steve D
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "skipgadd@earthlink.net" <
> > Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 18:55
> > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Shoulder Harness
> > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
> >
> >
> >> Joseph,
> >> Attached shows how I did my front and pilot pits. Keep in mind this
> >> Piethas not been off the ground.
> >> The 7/16 picture shows the 2nd or 3rd practice instrument board, I
> >> havesince moved the engine instruments to the right and the mag
> >> switch to the
> >> left, because when starting my Grega I am always standing at the
> >> prop or on
> >> the left side.
> >> Skip
> >>
> >>
> >>> [Original Message]
> >>> From: Ohbejoyful <>>> To: <>>> Date: 2/19/2013 8:35:12 PM
> >>> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Shoulder Harness
> >>>
> >>> I am considering putting shoulder harnesses in my Pietenpol.
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone have any ideas as to the best anchor point for the shoulder
> >> harness for the rear seat? Also what hardware have you found best to mount
> >> to the structure?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Joseph
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|