Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Sat 05/11/13


Total Messages Posted: 14



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:57 AM - Fire extinguisher (at7000ft)
     2. 09:14 AM - Re: spruce capstrip (Jim Boyer)
     3. 11:49 AM - Re: My Days Work (Mark Roberts)
     4. 11:50 AM - Re: Fire extinguisher (Kip and Beth Gardner)
     5. 12:36 PM - Re: spruce capstrip (taildrags)
     6. 12:55 PM - Re: Re: My Days Work (Gary Boothe)
     7. 01:04 PM - Re: Fire extinguisher (taildrags)
     8. 01:14 PM - Re: My Days Work (taildrags)
     9. 01:52 PM - Re: Fire extinguisher (curtdm(at)gmail.com)
    10. 02:02 PM - Re: Fire extinguisher (taildrags)
    11. 04:28 PM - Re: Re: spruce capstrip (Isablcorky@aol.com)
    12. 05:34 PM - Re: Re: spruce capstrip (C N Campbell)
    13. 05:46 PM - Re: Well, I did it... Cut out that compression fracture (Mark Roberts)
    14. 06:15 PM - Re: My Days Work (Mark Roberts)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:57:45 AM PST US
    Subject: Fire extinguisher
    From: "at7000ft" <at7000ft@gmail.com>
    Guys Haven't posted in quite a while but I am just about ready to drag my Piet to a hanger I am sharing with a great guy with two Thorpe T-18s (Meadow Lake, east of Colorado Springs). Anyhow I know its not a requirement but how many of you guys carry a fire extinguisher? And what type? Would a halon extinguisher work in an open cockpit or would a dry chemical type be better? Asked the FAA safety people at SNF and they were clueless. rick -------- Rick Holland Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400342#400342


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:14:40 AM PST US
    From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: spruce capstrip
    NO you drink Scotch; you are a Scot.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:49:54 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: My Days Work
    From: "Mark Roberts" <mark.rbrts1@gmail.com>
    Hi Guys: Welcome to the 613.5 club! Yes, I am building that airfoil as well. I know recent testing has been done on the different rib styles, but I'm going for the true "Experimental" route and using the GA-30-613.5 (as Mr. Riblett corrected me when I asked his advice between the "612 and the 613.5" for my fat all up weight). I do have plans drawn out if you want them. I don't "Publish" them as I want no liability for their use. I drew them to the actual plots published, and used the same size capstrip as the piet airfoil. I also did SEVERAL iterations of them, and punched out the jig on a CNC router I had. I also drew out the gussets to be laser cut. At one point, during one of my more and more frequent job lay offs, I had thought that I might kit the various airfoil jigs and parts (including a 'stick' cutting jig that would fit on a table saw and allow you to cut all of the internal parts accurately, with the right length, and angle to just POP into place and glue... made one and it works well, but not cost effective to make and ship). The jig I finalized used 1/4" dowels as bracing as it was easier to punch out on a CNC router. It is "dead to nuts" accurate to the original .dat point file on the airfoil plot. So, here's my take as a heretic of the "Riblett following": Listen to Oscar (aka Taildrags) in his analysis of the spar. It is height, not spar width that will make the biggest strength difference. The true strength is in the top and bottom of the spar which carry the compression and tension loads, and the height between the 2 that makes the spar stronger, not the width. (OK: that's a readers digest summary, perhaps you engineers will wince (Oscar!). The Riblett spar slots are deeper (taller) at their respective positions on the plot. Taller equals more spar height (depth) if you choose to make the spar fill the entire rib (top to bottom) with a spar (I do and I will). So (Oscar, correct my simple engineering mind if I am incorrect, but I'm not), the distance between the top and bottom of the spar can increase, allowing for a stronger wing spar for an extended length wing (as I plan.... I know HERESY!). For the record: I have allowed for the changes in wing length by taking advantage of a taller spar with 1" depth- routed for lightening- and moving the strut connection to the spar out one wing bay to allow for the added stress of 2 additional bays per side... and yes, I designed the vertical tail and stab/elevator to the proper size to compensate for the additional wing area and fuse nose extension by 2"). In theory, the Riblett design could add additional lift and allow to carry heavier loads. I plan to go for the full 1320 lb weight limit on my Piet with the additional strength changes to the design. So, hope that helps! Mark Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400361#400361


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:50:50 AM PST US
    From: Kip and Beth Gardner <kipandbeth@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Fire extinguisher
    Rick, I would say offhand, go with the dry chem. With either you may have a problem getting it onto the fire, but if you succeed in that, the dry chem is going to have a continuous action, where the halon will dissipate rapidly. On May 11, 2013, at 10:57 AM, at7000ft wrote: > > Guys > > Haven't posted in quite a while but I am just about ready to drag my > Piet to a hanger I am sharing with a great guy with two Thorpe T-18s > (Meadow Lake, east of Colorado Springs). > > Anyhow I know its not a requirement but how many of you guys carry a > fire extinguisher? And what type? Would a halon extinguisher work in > an open cockpit or would a dry chemical type be better? Asked the > FAA safety people at SNF and they were clueless. > > rick > > -------- > Rick Holland > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400342#400342 > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:36:43 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: spruce capstrip
    From: "taildrags" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
    Aye, it's "Scots", man. Nothing against a little Glenlivet scotch, though! My grandfather, Paul Young, was Scots-Irish. I guess that's why I never throw anything away and always try to make do with what I have ;o) -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC &quot;Scout&quot; A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400366#400366


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:55:51 PM PST US
    From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: My Days Work
    Not endorsing the Riblett airfoils, but I have seen Mark's rib jib...it's a thing of beauty!! Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Roberts Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 11:49 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: My Days Work --> <mark.rbrts1@gmail.com> Hi Guys: Welcome to the 613.5 club! Yes, I am building that airfoil as well. I know recent testing has been done on the different rib styles, but I'm going for the true "Experimental" route and using the GA-30-613.5 (as Mr. Riblett corrected me when I asked his advice between the "612 and the 613.5" for my fat all up weight). I do have plans drawn out if you want them. I don't "Publish" them as I want no liability for their use. I drew them to the actual plots published, and used the same size capstrip as the piet airfoil. I also did SEVERAL iterations of them, and punched out the jig on a CNC router I had. I also drew out the gussets to be laser cut. At one point, during one of my more and more frequent job lay offs, I had thought that I might kit the various airfoil jigs and parts (including a 'stick' cutting jig that would fit on a table saw and allow you to cut all of the internal parts accurately, with the right length, and angle to just POP into place and glue... made one and it works well, but not cost effective to make and ship). The jig I finalized used 1/4" dowels as bracing as it was easier to punch out on a CNC router. It is "dead to nuts" accurate to the original .dat point file on the airfoil plot. So, here's my take as a heretic of the "Riblett following": Listen to Oscar (aka Taildrags) in his analysis of the spar. It is height, not spar width that will make the biggest strength difference. The true strength is in the top and bottom of the spar which carry the compression and tension loads, and the height between the 2 that makes the spar stronger, not the width. (OK: that's a readers digest summary, perhaps you engineers will wince (Oscar!). The Riblett spar slots are deeper (taller) at their respective positions on the plot. Taller equals more spar height (depth) if you choose to make the spar fill the entire rib (top to bottom) with a spar (I do and I will). So (Oscar, correct my simple engineering mind if I am incorrect, but I'm not), the distance between the top and bottom of the spar can increase, allowing for a stronger wing spar for an extended length wing (as I plan.... I know HERESY!). For the record: I have allowed for the changes in wing length by taking advantage of a taller spar with 1" depth- routed for lightening- and moving the strut connection to the spar out one wing bay to allow for the added stress of 2 additional bays per side... and yes, I designed the vertical tail and stab/elevator to the proper size to compensate for the additional wing area and fuse nose extension by 2"). In theory, the Riblett design could add additional lift and allow to carry heavier loads. I plan to go for the full 1320 lb weight limit on my Piet with the additional strength changes to the design. So, hope that helps! Mark Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400361#400361


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:04:41 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fire extinguisher
    From: "taildrags" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
    Boy, I'll bet you get answers that are all over the map on this one. It's really going to depend on where and when you expect to have to use the extinguisher, and on what type of fire. My guess is that if you have a fire while in the air, you won't be in any position to handle the extinguisher while flying the plane, but the alternative isn't pretty either. On the ground, you will have a better chance of properly applying the extinguisher while shutting down the engine and fuel supply. The three common classes fires (for purposes of extinguishers) are A, B, and C. Class A are ordinary combustibles such as wood, paper, fabric, etc. Class B are flammable and combustible liquids. Class C are electrical fires. Most household or light commercial portable extinguishers are either dry chemical types rated for A-B-C, or CO2, rated for B or C. There are pros and cons to each. The dry chemical types, as Kip mentioned, may be the best choice but be aware that they do leave a residue and it will require cleanup or you can get corrosion from the residue. The CO2 extinguishers leave no residue, but don't work well when you may have wood and fabric on fire. CO2 will almost certainly get blown out of your cockpit if you're in flight or have the engine running when you try to use it. Too many variables, and no cure-all. The other problem is that there isn't much room in a Piet cockpit to carry an extinguisher of any size, so you really only get one short shot at putting out a fire with a small extinguisher. If you want to sacrifice one, set up a mock fire with spruce, fabric, or avgas and try a small A-B-C extinguisher on it to see if it's worth the effort to carry in the cockpit. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC &quot;Scout&quot; A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400368#400368


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:14:08 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: My Days Work
    From: "taildrags" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
    Mark; I think your Reader's Digest version states things very clearly. And yes, in theory a taller spar should be able to resist a greater bending load (lift, in the case of a cantilevered airplane wing), which should enable you to increase the span or the wing loading. With that said, I will reiterate what others have pointed out: the chain is only as strong as its weakest link. You can strengthen one link or several links, but then the failure point moves elsewhere and you have to make sure you check all the links. One thing affects another, and another. You need to check the lift struts, the strut attach hardware and fittings, maybe the internal wing bay bracing, who knows what else. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC &quot;Scout&quot; A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400371#400371


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:52:55 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fire extinguisher
    From: "curtdm(at)gmail.com" <curtdm@gmail.com>
    The pond! The pond's the safest place Axel! -------- Curt Merdan Flower Mound, TX Do Not Archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400373#400373


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:02:46 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fire extinguisher
    From: "taildrags" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
    Curt, you may actually be right about that (unless the pond is salt water). Except now you're going to start a whole new discussion about the best type of PFD to wear while flying, in the event of a water landing ;o) On a more serious note, I saw in the news earlier this week where one of the crew aboard a World Cup catamaran drowned when the boat capsized. If you get trapped in the wreckage, boat or airplane, things can turn rotten in a hurry and neither a PFD nor a fire extinguisher can help much. It's best that we- do not archive -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC &quot;Scout&quot; A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400374#400374


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:28:41 PM PST US
    From: Isablcorky@aol.com
    Subject: Re: spruce capstrip
    In a message dated 5/11/2013 2:37:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time, taildrags@hotmail.com writes: --> Pietenpol-List message posted by: "taildrags" <taildrags@hotmail.com> Aye, it's "Scots", man. Nothing against a little Glenlivet scotch, though! My grandfather, Paul Young, was Scots-Irish. I guess that's why I never throw anything away and always try to make do with what I have ;o) -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC &quot;Scout&quot; A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400366#400366 So that's why I've always ended up with all my stuff.


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:34:39 PM PST US
    From: "C N Campbell" <cncampbell@windstream.net>
    Subject: Re: spruce capstrip
    I'm Scots-Irish --- very frugal. C Do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: Isablcorky@aol.com To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 7:28 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: spruce capstrip In a message dated 5/11/2013 2:37:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time, taildrags@hotmail.com writes: <taildrags@hotmail.com> Aye, it's "Scots", man. Nothing against a little Glenlivet scotch, though! My grandfather, Paul Young, was Scots-Irish. I guess that's why I never throw anything away and always try to make do with what I have ;o) -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC &quot;Scout&quot; A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400366#400366 So that's why I've always ended up with all my stuff.


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:46:09 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Well, I did it... Cut out that compression fracture
    From: "Mark Roberts" <mark.rbrts1@gmail.com>
    Now it's fixed! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400389#400389 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/13683195156930_799.jpg


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:15:05 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: My Days Work
    From: "Mark Roberts" <mark.rbrts1@gmail.com>
    I blush. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400392#400392




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --