Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:57 AM - Fire extinguisher (at7000ft)
     2. 09:14 AM - Re: spruce capstrip (Jim Boyer)
     3. 11:49 AM - Re: My Days Work (Mark Roberts)
     4. 11:50 AM - Re: Fire extinguisher (Kip and Beth Gardner)
     5. 12:36 PM - Re: spruce capstrip (taildrags)
     6. 12:55 PM - Re: Re: My Days Work (Gary Boothe)
     7. 01:04 PM - Re: Fire extinguisher (taildrags)
     8. 01:14 PM - Re: My Days Work (taildrags)
     9. 01:52 PM - Re: Fire extinguisher (curtdm(at)gmail.com)
    10. 02:02 PM - Re: Fire extinguisher (taildrags)
    11. 04:28 PM - Re: Re: spruce capstrip (Isablcorky@aol.com)
    12. 05:34 PM - Re: Re: spruce capstrip (C N Campbell)
    13. 05:46 PM - Re: Well, I did it... Cut out that compression fracture (Mark Roberts)
    14. 06:15 PM - Re: My Days Work (Mark Roberts)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Fire extinguisher | 
      
      
      Guys
      
      Haven't posted in quite a while but I am just about ready to drag my Piet to a
      hanger I am sharing with a great guy with two Thorpe T-18s (Meadow Lake, east
      of Colorado Springs).
      
      Anyhow I know its not a requirement but how many of you guys carry a fire extinguisher?
      And what type? Would a halon extinguisher work in an open cockpit or
      would a dry chemical type be better? Asked the FAA safety people at SNF and they
      were clueless.
      
      rick
      
      --------
      Rick Holland
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400342#400342
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: spruce capstrip | 
      
      NO you drink Scotch; you are a Scot. 
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: My Days Work | 
      
      
      Hi Guys:
      
      Welcome to the 613.5 club! Yes, I am building that airfoil as well. I know recent
      testing has been done on the different rib styles, but I'm going for the true
      "Experimental" route and using the GA-30-613.5 (as Mr. Riblett corrected me
      when I asked his advice between the "612 and the 613.5" for my fat all up weight).
      
      I do have plans drawn out if you want them. I don't "Publish" them as I want no
      liability for their use. I drew them to the actual plots published, and used
      the same size capstrip as the piet airfoil. I also did SEVERAL iterations of them,
      and punched out the jig on a CNC router I had. I also drew out the gussets
      to be laser cut. 
      
      At one point, during one of my more and more frequent job lay offs, I had thought
      that I might kit the various airfoil jigs and parts (including a 'stick' cutting
      jig that would fit on a table saw and allow you to cut all of the internal
      parts accurately, with the right length, and angle to just POP into place and
      glue... made one and it works well, but not cost effective to make and ship).
      The jig I finalized used 1/4" dowels as bracing as it was easier to punch out
      on a CNC router. It is "dead to nuts" accurate to the original .dat point file
      on the airfoil plot. 
      
      So, here's my take as a heretic of the "Riblett following":
      
      
      Listen to Oscar (aka Taildrags) in his analysis of the spar. It is height, not
      spar width that will make the biggest strength difference. The true strength is
      in the top and bottom of the spar which carry the compression and tension loads,
      and the height between the 2 that makes the spar stronger, not the width.
      (OK: that's a readers digest summary, perhaps you engineers will wince (Oscar!).
      
      The Riblett spar slots are deeper (taller) at their respective positions on the
      plot. Taller equals more spar height (depth) if you choose to make the spar fill
      the entire rib (top to bottom) with a spar (I do and I will). So (Oscar, correct
      my simple engineering mind if I am incorrect, but I'm not), the distance
      between the top and bottom of the spar can increase, allowing for a stronger
      wing spar for an extended length wing (as I plan.... I know HERESY!). For the
      record: I have allowed for the changes in wing length by taking advantage of
      a taller spar with 1" depth- routed for lightening- and moving the strut connection
      to the spar out one wing bay to allow for the added stress of 2 additional
      bays per side... and yes, I designed the vertical tail and stab/elevator to
      the proper size to compensate for the additional wing area and fuse nose extension
      by 2").
      
      In theory, the Riblett design could add additional lift and allow to carry heavier
      loads. I plan to go for the full 1320 lb weight limit on my Piet with the
      additional strength changes to the design.
      
      
      So, hope that helps!
      
      Mark
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400361#400361
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fire extinguisher | 
      
      
      Rick,
      
      I would say offhand, go with the dry chem.  With either you may have a  
      problem getting it onto the fire, but if you succeed in that, the dry  
      chem is going to have a continuous action, where the halon will  
      dissipate rapidly.
      
      On May 11, 2013, at 10:57 AM, at7000ft wrote:
      
      >
      > Guys
      >
      > Haven't posted in quite a while but I am just about ready to drag my  
      > Piet to a hanger I am sharing with a great guy with two Thorpe T-18s  
      > (Meadow Lake, east of Colorado Springs).
      >
      > Anyhow I know its not a requirement but how many of you guys carry a  
      > fire extinguisher? And what type? Would a halon extinguisher work in  
      > an open cockpit or would a dry chemical type be better? Asked the  
      > FAA safety people at SNF and they were clueless.
      >
      > rick
      >
      > --------
      > Rick Holland
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400342#400342
      >
      >
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: spruce capstrip | 
      
      
      Aye, it's "Scots", man.  Nothing against a little Glenlivet scotch, though!
      
      My grandfather, Paul Young, was Scots-Irish.  I guess that's why I never throw
      anything away and always try to make do with what I have ;o)
      
      --------
      Oscar Zuniga
      Medford, OR
      Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
      A75 power
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400366#400366
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: My Days Work | 
      
      
      Not endorsing the Riblett airfoils, but I have seen Mark's rib jib...it's a
      thing of beauty!!
      
      Gary Boothe
      NX308MB
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Roberts
      Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 11:49 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: My Days Work
      
      --> <mark.rbrts1@gmail.com>
      
      Hi Guys:
      
      Welcome to the 613.5 club! Yes, I am building that airfoil as well. I know
      recent testing has been done on the different rib styles, but I'm going for
      the true "Experimental" route and using the GA-30-613.5 (as Mr. Riblett
      corrected me when I asked his advice between the "612 and the 613.5" for my
      fat all up weight).
      
      I do have plans drawn out if you want them. I don't "Publish" them as I want
      no liability for their use. I drew them to the actual plots published, and
      used the same size capstrip as the piet airfoil. I also did SEVERAL
      iterations of them, and punched out the jig on a CNC router I had. I also
      drew out the gussets to be laser cut. 
      
      At one point, during one of my more and more frequent job lay offs, I had
      thought that I might kit the various airfoil jigs and parts (including a
      'stick' cutting jig that would fit on a table saw and allow you to cut all
      of the internal parts accurately, with the right length, and angle to just
      POP into place and glue... made one and it works well, but not cost
      effective to make and ship). The jig I finalized used 1/4" dowels as bracing
      as it was easier to punch out on a CNC router. It is "dead to nuts" accurate
      to the original .dat point file on the airfoil plot. 
      
      So, here's my take as a heretic of the "Riblett following":
      
      
      Listen to Oscar (aka Taildrags) in his analysis of the spar. It is height,
      not spar width that will make the biggest strength difference. The true
      strength is in the top and bottom of the spar which carry the compression
      and tension loads, and the height between the 2 that makes the spar
      stronger, not the width. (OK: that's a readers digest summary, perhaps you
      engineers will wince (Oscar!).
      
      The Riblett spar slots are deeper (taller) at their respective positions on
      the plot. Taller equals more spar height (depth) if you choose to make the
      spar fill the entire rib (top to bottom) with a spar (I do and I will). So
      (Oscar, correct my simple engineering mind if I am incorrect, but I'm not),
      the distance between the top and bottom of the spar can increase, allowing
      for a stronger wing spar for an extended length wing (as I plan.... I know
      HERESY!). For the record: I have allowed for the changes in wing length by
      taking advantage of a taller spar with 1" depth- routed for lightening- and
      moving the strut connection to the spar out one wing bay to allow for the
      added stress of 2 additional bays per side... and yes, I designed the
      vertical tail and stab/elevator to the proper size to compensate for the
      additional wing area and fuse nose extension by 2").
      
      In theory, the Riblett design could add additional lift and allow to carry
      heavier loads. I plan to go for the full 1320 lb weight limit on my Piet
      with the additional strength changes to the design.
      
      
      So, hope that helps!
      
      Mark
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400361#400361
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fire extinguisher | 
      
      
      Boy, I'll  bet you get answers that are all over the map on this one.  It's really
      going to depend on where and when you expect to have to use the extinguisher,
      and on what type of fire.  My guess is that if you have a fire while in the
      air, you won't be in any position to handle the extinguisher while flying the
      plane, but the alternative isn't pretty either.  On the ground, you will have
      a better chance of properly applying the extinguisher while shutting down the
      engine and fuel supply.
      
      The three common classes fires (for purposes of extinguishers) are A, B, and C.
      Class A are ordinary combustibles such as wood, paper, fabric, etc.  Class B
      are flammable and combustible liquids.  Class C are electrical fires.  Most household
      or light commercial portable extinguishers are either dry chemical types
      rated for A-B-C, or CO2, rated for B or C.  There are pros and cons to each.
      The dry chemical types, as Kip mentioned, may be the best choice but be aware
      that they do leave a residue and it will require cleanup or you can get corrosion
      from the residue.  The CO2 extinguishers leave no residue, but don't work
      well when you may have wood and fabric on fire.  CO2 will almost certainly
      get blown out of your cockpit if you're in flight or have the engine running
      when you try to use it.
      
      Too many variables, and no cure-all.  The other problem is that there isn't much
      room in a Piet cockpit to carry an extinguisher of any size, so you really only
      get one short shot at putting out a fire with a small extinguisher.  If you
      want to sacrifice one, set up a mock fire with spruce, fabric, or avgas and
      try a small A-B-C extinguisher on it to see if it's worth the effort to carry
      in the cockpit.
      
      --------
      Oscar Zuniga
      Medford, OR
      Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
      A75 power
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400368#400368
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: My Days Work | 
      
      
      Mark; I think your Reader's Digest version states things very clearly.  And yes,
      in theory a taller spar should be able to resist a greater bending load (lift,
      in the case of a cantilevered airplane wing), which should enable you to increase
      the span or the wing loading.
      
      With that said, I will reiterate what others have pointed out: the chain is only
      as strong as its weakest link.  You can strengthen one link or several links,
      but then the failure point moves elsewhere and you have to make sure you check
      all the links.  One thing affects another, and another.  You need to check
      the lift struts, the strut attach hardware and fittings, maybe the internal wing
      bay bracing, who knows what else.
      
      --------
      Oscar Zuniga
      Medford, OR
      Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
      A75 power
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400371#400371
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fire extinguisher | 
      
      
      The pond! The pond's the safest place Axel!
      
      --------
      Curt Merdan
      Flower Mound, TX
      
      Do Not Archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400373#400373
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fire extinguisher | 
      
      
      Curt, you may actually be right about that (unless the pond is salt water).   
      Except now you're going to start a whole new discussion about the best type of
      PFD to wear while flying, in the event of a water landing ;o)
      
      On a more serious note, I saw in the news earlier this week where one of the crew
      aboard a World Cup catamaran drowned when the boat capsized.  If you get trapped
      in the wreckage, boat or airplane, things can turn rotten in a hurry and
      neither a PFD nor a fire extinguisher can help much.
      
      It's best that we-
      
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Oscar Zuniga
      Medford, OR
      Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
      A75 power
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400374#400374
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: spruce capstrip | 
      
      
      In a message dated 5/11/2013 2:37:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
      taildrags@hotmail.com writes:
      
      -->  Pietenpol-List message posted by: "taildrags"  <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      
      Aye, it's "Scots", man.  Nothing  against a little Glenlivet scotch, though!
      
      My grandfather, Paul Young,  was Scots-Irish.  I guess that's why I never 
      throw anything away and  always try to make do with what I have ;o)
      
      --------
      Oscar  Zuniga
      Medford, OR
      Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
      A75  power
      
      
      Read this topic online  here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400366#400366
      
      
      So that's why I've always ended up with all my  stuff.
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: spruce capstrip | 
      
      I'm Scots-Irish --- very frugal.  C
      
      Do not archive
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Isablcorky@aol.com 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 7:28 PM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: spruce capstrip
      
      
        In a message dated 5/11/2013 2:37:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
      taildrags@hotmail.com writes:
      <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      
          Aye, it's "Scots", man.  Nothing against a little Glenlivet scotch, 
      though!
      
          My grandfather, Paul Young, was Scots-Irish.  I guess that's why I 
      never throw anything away and always try to make do with what I have ;o)
      
          --------
          Oscar Zuniga
          Medford, OR
          Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
          A75 power
      
      
          Read this topic online here:
      
          http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400366#400366
      
      
        So that's why I've always ended up with all my stuff.
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Well, I did it... Cut out that compression fracture | 
      
      
      Now it's fixed!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400389#400389
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/13683195156930_799.jpg
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: My Days Work | 
      
      
      I blush.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=400392#400392
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |