Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:12 AM - 2013 List of Contributors (Matt Dralle)
     2. 07:52 AM - Re: prop finish (Michael Perez)
     3. 07:59 AM - Re: prop finish (Scott Knowlton)
     4. 10:02 AM - walking beam streamlined tube alternative (nightmare)
     5. 10:04 AM - Re: prop finish (Steven Dortch)
     6. 10:09 AM - A65 eyebrow cowlings (Steven Dortch)
     7. 10:18 AM - Re: A65 eyebrow cowlings (Jack Phillips)
     8. 11:53 AM - Re: walking beam streamlined tube alternative (skipgadd@earthlink.net)
     9. 01:23 PM - Re: prop finish (Scott Knowlton)
    10. 02:29 PM - Re: A65 eyebrow cowlings (dgaldrich)
    11. 05:24 PM - Re: walking beam streamlined tube alternative (nightmare)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | 2013 List of Contributors | 
      
      
      Dear Listers,
      
      The 2013 Matronics Email List and Forum Fund Raiser officially ended a couple of
      weeks ago and it's time that I published this year's List of Contributors. 
      It is the people on this list that directly make these Email Lists and Forums
      possible!  Their generous Contributions keep the servers and Internet connection
      up and running!
      
      You can still show your support this year and pick up a great gift at the same
      time.  The Contribution Web Site is fast, easy, and secure:
      
              http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      Or, by dropping a personal check in the mail to: 
      
              Matt Dralle / Matronics 
              581 Jeannie Way 
              Livermore CA 94550
      
      
      I also want to thank Andy, Bob, Corbin, George, and Jon for their generous support
      through the supply of many great gifts this year!!  These guys have some excellent
      products and I encourage you to visit their respective web sites:
      
              Andy Gold - The Builder's Bookstore - http://www.buildersbooks.com
      
              Bob Nucklolls - AeroElectric - http://www.aeroelectric.com
              
      	Corbin Glowacki - My Pilot Store - http://www.mypilotstore.com
      
      	George Race - Race Consulting - http://www.mrrace.com
      
              Jon Croke - HomebuiltHELP - http://www.homebuilthelp.com
      
      
      And finally, I'm proud to present The 2013 Fund Raiser List of Contributors:
      
              http://www.matronics.com/loc/2013.html
      
      
      Thank you again to everyone that made a Contribution this year!!
      
      Matt Dralle
      Matronics Email List & Forum Administrator
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      That would be me. I received my propeller from Jay a couple months ago in the rough.
      Jay included a note asking that I call him prior to doing anything on the
      propeller, so I did. That was when the conversation came up about leaving the
      machining scallops on it. We had a very nice, detailed conversation and from
      that, I decided to leave the prop. as received...VERY LITTLE sanding, not worth
      mentioning really, almost enough just to clean it up from being handled. (skin
      oils) I stained, painted and varnished the prop. and left all of the machining
      marks on it.  The "fields"...the area Jay calls the glass coated tips...were
      not sanded much either, just painted and varnished. I personally am not a
      big fan of smooth glossy finishes on some items, and leaving the propeller as
      is and staining, left a very nice, "aged" look with rich texture and color...just
      what I wanted.
      
      Theory is that the scallops act like a bird's feathers, dimples on a golf ball,
      or VGs, providing a better boundary layer on the airfoil.   Jay told me that
      others leaving the scallops noted better performance.
      
      I figure that later, if needed, I can always remove the scallops... not so easy
      to add them after sanding them off.
      
      My propeller is now finished, balanced and on the plane. (not permanent as of yet,
      working on tracking it now.) Very happy with how it looks, verdict still out
      on how it performs, but I have no doubt it will be just fine.
      
      Feel free to contact me if you want to chat further.
      
      Merry Christmas.
      
      If God is your co-pilot...switch seats.
      Michael Perez
      Pietenpol HINT Videos
      Karetaker Aero
      www.karetakeraero.com
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I'm awaiting the completion of my Cloudcars prop as well and would love to see
      a pic or two of yours finished Michael.  
      
      Scott 
      
      Sent from my iPhone
      
      > On Dec 16, 2013, at 7:56 AM, "Michael Perez" <speedbrake@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
      > 
      > 
      > That would be me. I received my propeller from Jay a couple months ago in the
      rough. Jay included a note asking that I call him prior to doing anything on
      the propeller, so I did. That was when the conversation came up about leaving
      the machining scallops on it. We had a very nice, detailed conversation and from
      that, I decided to leave the prop. as received...VERY LITTLE sanding, not worth
      mentioning really, almost enough just to clean it up from being handled.
      (skin oils) I stained, painted and varnished the prop. and left all of the machining
      marks on it.  The "fields"...the area Jay calls the glass coated tips...were
      not sanded much either, just painted and varnished. I personally am not
      a big fan of smooth glossy finishes on some items, and leaving the propeller as
      is and staining, left a very nice, "aged" look with rich texture and color...just
      what I wanted.
      > 
      > Theory is that the scallops act like a bird's feathers, dimples on a golf ball,
      or VGs, providing a better boundary layer on the airfoil.   Jay told me that
      others leaving the scallops noted better performance.
      > 
      > I figure that later, if needed, I can always remove the scallops... not so easy
      to add them after sanding them off.
      > 
      > My propeller is now finished, balanced and on the plane. (not permanent as of
      yet, working on tracking it now.) Very happy with how it looks, verdict still
      out on how it performs, but I have no doubt it will be just fine.
      > 
      > Feel free to contact me if you want to chat further.
      > 
      > Merry Christmas.
      > 
      > If God is your co-pilot...switch seats.
      > Michael Perez
      > Pietenpol HINT Videos
      > Karetaker Aero
      > www.karetakeraero.com
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | walking beam streamlined tube alternative | 
      
      
      Im sure this has been covered but cant seem to find. What is common round tube
      used in substitute of streamlined tube for the walking beam? Wall thickness and
      outer diam please. Paul
      
      --------
      Paul Donahue
      Started 8-3-12
      do not archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=415748#415748
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Scott, It was my aerodynamacist buddy who explained how the scallops create
      a turbulence right next to the skin that is slicker than letting the
      air go across a smooth surface. This holds the boundary layer closer to the
      airfoil of the prop and thus provides better "lift" which translates into
      thrust in this case.
      
      it is somewhat counter intuitive but there it is.
      
      Blue Skies,
      Steve D
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | A65 eyebrow cowlings | 
      
       Aircraft Spruce saves the day again.
      
      Remember, I am restoring/reassembling a plane I did not disassemble. So I
      spend a lot of time figuring out where things go.
      For the life of me I could not figure out how the eyebrow cowlings went on,
      They interfered with the fancy old style sparkplugs and leads John K. had
      put on the engine. Nothing fit. I searched the internet and could not see
      enough detail to see what I needed. Then I saw a set a eyebrows that
      Aircraft spruce has for sale ($464) and lo and behold, there was a set of
      brackets that explained it all. I then dug in the box of extra stuff John
      gave me and found the eyebrow cowling brackets for this plane. That
      additional spacing fixed everything.
      However, I am reasonably certain that I should not undo the nuts holding
      the jugs on to mount this bracket.  However there are not enough threads
      left for the bracket and a full sized nut. What do y'all do?    Put a
      thinner nut on?
      
      Blue Skies
      Steve D
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | A65 eyebrow cowlings | 
      
      Steve,
      
      
      I put my brackets on the cylinder studs and then put the nuts back on.  Be
      sure to torque them per the engine overhaul manual.  Also, be certain your
      brackets are steel, not aluminum.  My first brackets were aluminum and I
      found that in about 50 hours the nuts got loose.  Good way to blow a jug!  I
      mentioned that to an old-time Cub guy and said, yeah you've got to use
      steel.  Aluminum will always "work" enough to let the nut get loose.
      
      
      Good luck!
      
      
      Jack Phillips
      
      NX899JP
      
      Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven
      Dortch
      Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 1:09 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: A65 eyebrow cowlings
      
      
      Aircraft Spruce saves the day again. 
      
      Remember, I am restoring/reassembling a plane I did not disassemble. So I
      spend a lot of time figuring out where things go.
      
      For the life of me I could not figure out how the eyebrow cowlings went on,
      They interfered with the fancy old style sparkplugs and leads John K. had
      put on the engine. Nothing fit. I searched the internet and could not see
      enough detail to see what I needed. Then I saw a set a eyebrows that
      Aircraft spruce has for sale ($464) and lo and behold, there was a set of
      brackets that explained it all. I then dug in the box of extra stuff John
      gave me and found the eyebrow cowling brackets for this plane. That
      additional spacing fixed everything. 
      
      However, I am reasonably certain that I should not undo the nuts holding the
      jugs on to mount this bracket.  However there are not enough threads left
      for the bracket and a full sized nut. What do y'all do?    Put a thinner nut
      on?
      
      Blue Skies
      
      Steve D  
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | walking beam streamlined tube alternative | 
      
      Paul,
      I made mine like Pietenpol control horns, .032 or 22 ga edge welded. Made
      somewhat like Ken Perkins design, it is suppose to help out with the
      elevator cable slackness.
      It is 8 1/2" long, 1 1/4" wide in the main body. The aft holes are 7 1/4"
      apart(the same as the elevator horn), the front holes are 7 3/4" apart.
      My plane has not flown yet, hopfully in the next year or two.
      Skip
      
      
      > [Original Message]
      > From: nightmare <pauldonahuepilot@yahoo.com>
      > To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
      > Date: 12/16/2013 1:10:21 PM
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: walking beam streamlined tube alternative
      >
      <pauldonahuepilot@yahoo.com>
      >
      > Im sure this has been covered but cant seem to find. What is common round
      tube used in substitute of streamlined tube for the walking beam? Wall
      thickness and outer diam please. Paul
      >
      > --------
      > Paul Donahue
      > Started 8-3-12
      > do not archive
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=415748#415748
      >
      >
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Thanks Steve. Very encouraging!  
      
      Scott 
      
      Sent from my iPhone
      
      > On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:08 AM, "Steven Dortch" <steven.d.dortch@gmail.com> w
      rote:
      > 
      > Scott, It was my aerodynamacist buddy who explained how the scallops creat
      e a turbulence right next to the skin that is slicker than letting the air g
      o across a smooth surface. This holds the boundary layer closer to the airfo
      il of the prop and thus provides better "lift" which translates into thrust i
      n this case.
      >  
      > it is somewhat counter intuitive but there it is. 
      >  
      > Blue Skies,
      > Steve D 
      > 
      > 
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: A65 eyebrow cowlings | 
      
      
      I believe Continental used Pal nuts to secure them.  Only takes a couple of threads.
      AS&S sells them under MS27151.
      
      Dave
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=415767#415767
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: walking beam streamlined tube alternative | 
      
      
      Great . Thanks Skip
      
      --------
      Paul Donahue
      Started 8-3-12
      do not archive
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=415771#415771
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |