Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:14 AM - Re: giblets (womenfly2)
     2. 02:59 PM - Re: Re: giblets (jim hyde)
     3. 07:38 PM - Re: Re: giblets (Steven Dortch)
     4. 08:26 PM - Phishing attack (Ken Bickers)
     5. 08:34 PM - Re: Re: giblets (jim hyde)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      The side area of a fuselage is part of the design calculations on the yaw stability
      along the vertical axis which includes the fin area. The area removed would
      have to be calculated for the loss area of the fuselage sides an added to the
      fin to keep the stability as designed.
      
      Just my 2-cents worth .... WF2
      
      --------
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=421554#421554
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      ood thanks=0Ajim=0AOn Friday, April 4, 2014 7:24 AM, womenfly2 <Love2Fly.KA
      " <Love2Fly.KAP@gmail.com>=0A=0AThe side area of a fuselage is part of the 
      design calculations on the yaw stability along the vertical axis which incl
      udes the fin area. The area removed would have to be calculated for the los
      s area of the fuselage sides an added to the fin to keep the stability as d
      esigned.=0A=0AJust my 2-cents worth .... WF2=0A=0A--------=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
      =0A=0ARead this topic online here:=0A=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.com/viewtop
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Matt Dralle, L
      =======
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Below is a response from my buddy the aerodynamacyst. He is also a plane
      ownerr of some experience. I asked him about effects of drag, slipping and
      would streamlinig the exposed wood/tubes help.
      
      
      G'day Steve,
      
      Yes, the drag will be increased with an exposed fuselage structure.
      
      Will it fly? That depends on the available thrust horsepower available.
      Enough, and it will
      fly.
      
      The next question is: How does not covering the fuselage affect the
      stability and control
      as well as the balance of the aircraft? Unknown.
      
      Slipping should work. The exposed fuselage may, or may not, have more drag
      than the
      covered fuselage in a slip.
      
      Streamlining might help the aerodynamics but may not help the structural
      strength.
      
      If left uncovered, the owner will not just be a test pilot for a known
      design, but
      an EXPERIMENTAL test pilot for an "unknown" design.
      
      Dave Rogers
      
      
      On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:58 PM, jim hyde <jnl96@yahoo.com> wrote:
      
      > ood thanks
      > jim
      >   On Friday, April 4, 2014 7:24 AM, womenfly2 <Love2Fly.KAP@gmail.com>
      > wrote:
      > >
      >
      > The side area of a fuselage is part of the design calculations on the yaw
      > stability along the vertical axis which includes the fin area. The area
      > removed would have to be calculated for the loss area of the fuselage sides
      > an added to the fin to keep the stability as designed.
      >
      > Just my 2-cents worth .... WF2
      >
      > --------
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=421554#421554
      >
      > /Navigator?Pietenpol-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navig
      >             - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS=                    &n-->
      > http://ww======================
      >
      >
      > <http://www.matronics.com/contribution>
      >
      > *
      >
      >
      > *
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Blue Skies,
      Steve D
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Folks,
      
      It appears that my userid is currently being used as an alias in a phishing
      attack.  Please do not open any email that appears to be coming from me
      that asks you to open a Google Doc file.  I have not sent such an email and
      apologize in advance for the inconvenience.
      
      My best, Ken Bickers
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      thanks jim=0AOn Friday, April 4, 2014 9:48 PM, Steven Dortch <steven.d.dort
      ch@gmail.com> wrote:=0A  =0ABelow is a response from my buddy the aerodynam
      acyst. He is also a =0Aplane ownerr of some experience. I asked him about e
      ffects of drag, =0Aslipping and would streamlinig the exposed wood/tubes he
      lp. =0A=0A=0A=0A=0AG'day Steve,=0A=0AYes, the drag will be increased with a
      n exposed fuselage structure.=0A=0AWill it fly? That depends on the availab
      le thrust horsepower available. Enough, and it will=0Afly.=0A=0AThe next qu
      estion is: How does not covering the fuselage affect the stability and cont
      rol=0Aas well as the balance of the aircraft? Unknown.=0A=0ASlipping should
       work. The exposed fuselage may, or may not, have more drag than the=0Acove
      red fuselage in a slip.=0A=0AStreamlining might help the aerodynamics but m
      ay not help the structural strength.=0A=0AIf left uncovered, the owner will
       not just be a test pilot for a known design, but=0Aan EXPERIMENTAL test pi
      lot for an "unknown" design.=0A=0ADave Rogers=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Fri, Apr 4, 201
      4 at 4:58 PM, jim hyde <jnl96@yahoo.com> wrote:=0A=0Aood thanks=0A>jim=0A>O
      n Friday, April 4, 2014 7:24 AM, womenfly2 <Love2Fly.KAP@gmail.com> wrote:
      mail.com>=0A>=0A>The side area of a fuselage is part of the design calculat
      ions on the yaw stability along the vertical axis which includes the fin ar
      ea. The area removed would have to be calculated for the loss area of the f
      uselage sides an added to the fin to keep the stability as designed.=0A>=0A
      >Just my 2-cents worth .... WF2=0A>=0A>--------=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>
      =0A>Read this topic online here:=0A>=0A>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtop
      ic.php?p=421554#421554=0A>=0A>/Navigator?Pietenpol-List" target="_blank
      ">http://www.matronics.com/Navig=- - - - - - -  - MATRONICS
       WEB FORUMS=- - - - - - - - - - &n--> http://ww==
      ======================0A>=0A>=0A>
      =0A>=0A>=0A>    =0A>" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?
      Pietenpol-List=0Atp://forums.matronics.com=0A_blank">http://www.matronics.c
      =========== 
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |