Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Fri 04/04/14


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:14 AM - Re: giblets (womenfly2)
     2. 02:59 PM - Re: Re: giblets (jim hyde)
     3. 07:38 PM - Re: Re: giblets (Steven Dortch)
     4. 08:26 PM - Phishing attack (Ken Bickers)
     5. 08:34 PM - Re: Re: giblets (jim hyde)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:14:02 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: giblets
    From: "womenfly2" <Love2Fly.KAP@gmail.com>
    The side area of a fuselage is part of the design calculations on the yaw stability along the vertical axis which includes the fin area. The area removed would have to be calculated for the loss area of the fuselage sides an added to the fin to keep the stability as designed. Just my 2-cents worth .... WF2 -------- Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=421554#421554


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:59:55 PM PST US
    From: jim hyde <jnl96@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: giblets
    ood thanks=0Ajim=0AOn Friday, April 4, 2014 7:24 AM, womenfly2 <Love2Fly.KA " <Love2Fly.KAP@gmail.com>=0A=0AThe side area of a fuselage is part of the design calculations on the yaw stability along the vertical axis which incl udes the fin area. The area removed would have to be calculated for the los s area of the fuselage sides an added to the fin to keep the stability as d esigned.=0A=0AJust my 2-cents worth .... WF2=0A=0A--------=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A=0ARead this topic online here:=0A=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.com/viewtop - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Matt Dralle, L =======


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:38:38 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: giblets
    From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch@gmail.com>
    Below is a response from my buddy the aerodynamacyst. He is also a plane ownerr of some experience. I asked him about effects of drag, slipping and would streamlinig the exposed wood/tubes help. G'day Steve, Yes, the drag will be increased with an exposed fuselage structure. Will it fly? That depends on the available thrust horsepower available. Enough, and it will fly. The next question is: How does not covering the fuselage affect the stability and control as well as the balance of the aircraft? Unknown. Slipping should work. The exposed fuselage may, or may not, have more drag than the covered fuselage in a slip. Streamlining might help the aerodynamics but may not help the structural strength. If left uncovered, the owner will not just be a test pilot for a known design, but an EXPERIMENTAL test pilot for an "unknown" design. Dave Rogers On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:58 PM, jim hyde <jnl96@yahoo.com> wrote: > ood thanks > jim > On Friday, April 4, 2014 7:24 AM, womenfly2 <Love2Fly.KAP@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > The side area of a fuselage is part of the design calculations on the yaw > stability along the vertical axis which includes the fin area. The area > removed would have to be calculated for the loss area of the fuselage sides > an added to the fin to keep the stability as designed. > > Just my 2-cents worth .... WF2 > > -------- > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=421554#421554 > > /Navigator?Pietenpol-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navig > - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS= &n--> > http://ww====================== > > > <http://www.matronics.com/contribution> > > * > > > * > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:26:29 PM PST US
    Subject: Phishing attack
    From: Ken Bickers <bickers.ken@gmail.com>
    Folks, It appears that my userid is currently being used as an alias in a phishing attack. Please do not open any email that appears to be coming from me that asks you to open a Google Doc file. I have not sent such an email and apologize in advance for the inconvenience. My best, Ken Bickers


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:34:31 PM PST US
    From: jim hyde <jnl96@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: giblets
    thanks jim=0AOn Friday, April 4, 2014 9:48 PM, Steven Dortch <steven.d.dort ch@gmail.com> wrote:=0A =0ABelow is a response from my buddy the aerodynam acyst. He is also a =0Aplane ownerr of some experience. I asked him about e ffects of drag, =0Aslipping and would streamlinig the exposed wood/tubes he lp. =0A=0A=0A=0A=0AG'day Steve,=0A=0AYes, the drag will be increased with a n exposed fuselage structure.=0A=0AWill it fly? That depends on the availab le thrust horsepower available. Enough, and it will=0Afly.=0A=0AThe next qu estion is: How does not covering the fuselage affect the stability and cont rol=0Aas well as the balance of the aircraft? Unknown.=0A=0ASlipping should work. The exposed fuselage may, or may not, have more drag than the=0Acove red fuselage in a slip.=0A=0AStreamlining might help the aerodynamics but m ay not help the structural strength.=0A=0AIf left uncovered, the owner will not just be a test pilot for a known design, but=0Aan EXPERIMENTAL test pi lot for an "unknown" design.=0A=0ADave Rogers=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Fri, Apr 4, 201 4 at 4:58 PM, jim hyde <jnl96@yahoo.com> wrote:=0A=0Aood thanks=0A>jim=0A>O n Friday, April 4, 2014 7:24 AM, womenfly2 <Love2Fly.KAP@gmail.com> wrote: mail.com>=0A>=0A>The side area of a fuselage is part of the design calculat ions on the yaw stability along the vertical axis which includes the fin ar ea. The area removed would have to be calculated for the loss area of the f uselage sides an added to the fin to keep the stability as designed.=0A>=0A >Just my 2-cents worth .... WF2=0A>=0A>--------=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> =0A>Read this topic online here:=0A>=0A>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtop ic.php?p=421554#421554=0A>=0A>/Navigator?Pietenpol-List" target="_blank ">http://www.matronics.com/Navig=- - - - - - - - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS=- - - - - - - - - - &n--> http://ww== ======================0A>=0A>=0A> =0A>=0A>=0A> =0A>" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator? Pietenpol-List=0Atp://forums.matronics.com=0A_blank">http://www.matronics.c ===========




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --