Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 04:44 AM - Re: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37 (tools)
2. 04:59 AM - Re: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37 (tools)
3. 07:22 AM - Re: Re: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37 (Boatright, Jeffrey)
4. 07:33 AM - Kokomo (Douwe)
5. 08:48 AM - Re: FW: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37 (Barry Davis)
6. 09:01 AM - Re: Re: stacking planes (shad bell)
7. 02:09 PM - (Claude Corbett)
8. 04:40 PM - Material for wing ribs (Claude Corbett)
9. 07:04 PM - (Claude Corbett)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37 |
Looks good to me.
Can we get into c16 (near Champagne IL) without a transponder? I ain't got one...
Also don't really have a radio (might have it installed by then, just don't know),
so Owensboro class D is a very slight glitch.
Assuming we're planning an overnight somewhere. c16 is a reasonable choice and
is easy access to interstates for the chase vehicle.
Never been to any of them, which makes it more fun!
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424790#424790
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37 |
And it looks like we'll need gas in Boonville works alright with the interstate
system as well.
Can't see a reason not to go this way!
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424791#424791
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37 |
Ive also come across some more public use airports with grass/turf
runways that are near the current path. These may provide useful
alternates or we may find that they make better primaries than what we
have so far. I dont have those in front of me right now, but will send
later today as time allows.
If anyone has suggestions about the planning on this trip, please let us
know. Im just noodling on Foreflight, so none of this is written in stone
and none of it is based on personal recommendations.
Thanks,
Jeff
On 6/13/14, 7:59 AM, "tools" <n0kkj@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>And it looks like we'll need gas in Boonville works alright with the
>interstate system as well.
>
>Can't see a reason not to go this way!
>
>
>Read this topic online here:
>
>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424791#424791
>
>
________________________________
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Glenndale
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2014, at 2:02 AM, Pietenpol-List Digest Server <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
wrote:
> *
>
> =================================================
> Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive
> =================================================
>
> Today's complete Pietenpol-List Digest can also be found in either of the
> two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted
> in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes
> and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version
> of the Pietenpol-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor
> such as Notepad or with a web browser.
>
> HTML Version:
>
> http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=html&Chapter 14-06-12&Archive=Pietenpol
>
> Text Version:
>
> http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=txt&Chapter 14-06-12&Archive=Pietenpol
>
>
> ===============================================
> EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive
> ===============================================
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Pietenpol-List Digest Archive
> ---
> Total Messages Posted Thu 06/12/14: 21
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Today's Message Index:
> ----------------------
>
> 1. 03:57 AM - Re: stacking planes (Jeff Martin)
> 2. 04:27 AM - Re: stacking planes (Charles Burkholder)
> 3. 06:48 AM - builder questions (Douwe Blumberg)
> 4. 07:00 AM - flying north (Douwe Blumberg)
> 5. 07:13 AM - Re: flying north (Boatright, Jeffrey)
> 6. 07:53 AM - Re: Flying to brodhead 2014. (tools)
> 7. 08:12 AM - Re: stacking planes (shad bell)
> 8. 08:16 AM - Re: Re: Flying to brodhead 2014. (Boatright, Jeffrey)
> 9. 08:25 AM - Re: stacking planes (Jim Boyer)
> 10. 10:43 AM - Hinge Tail Feathers (namrednos)
> 11. 10:45 AM - Re: stacking planes (G Hansen)
> 12. 10:56 AM - Fw: Varnish (John Greenlee)
> 13. 11:21 AM - Re: Fw: Varnish (Scott Knowlton)
> 14. 11:40 AM - Re: Flying to brodhead 2014. (tools)
> 15. 11:48 AM - Parking at Air Venture. (tools)
> 16. 06:33 PM - Re: Flying to brodhead 2014. (tools)
> 17. 06:38 PM - Re: Flying to brodhead 2014. (tools)
> 18. 07:23 PM - Re: Fw: Varnish (Chris)
> 19. 08:04 PM - Material for wing ribs (Claude Corbett)
> 20. 08:36 PM - FW: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37 (Boatright, Jeffrey)
> 21. 09:12 PM - Re: stacking planes (taildrags)
>
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 03:57:20 AM PST US
> From: Jeff Martin <jammerrv8@aol.com>
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: stacking planes
>
> I would be more concerned with the landing gear
>
> Jeff Martin
>
>> On Jun 11, 2014, at 11:42 PM, Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch@gmail.com> wr
> ote:
>>
>> Guys, as I get my Pietenpol Air Camper closer to flight I am faced with th
> e dilemma of too many plane for one hangar. My 40X32 hangar (minus 7 ft in e
> ach front corner for folding doors) is too small to park both the old Vtail B
> onanza there and the Piet in the normal way.
>>
>> I have done a lot of math. But this looks like a real solution. please lo
> ok at these photos and tell me if parking the Pietenpol this way will damage
> the engine A65 Contenental or the plane? Of course I may have to drain fuel
> to do this. Will the engine oil be a problem?
>>
>> Blue Skies,
>> Steve D.
>>
>> <stacked cub.jpg>
>> <cubs_stacked.jpg>
>
> ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 04:27:03 AM PST US
> From: Charles Burkholder <born2fly@abcmailbox.net>
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: stacking planes
>
> Um, I will take 3 of those Cubs please. Nobody will miss them. LOL
> Charles Burkholder
> On 6/11/2014 10:42 PM, Steven Dortch wrote:
>>
>> Guys, as I get my Pietenpol Air Camper closer to flight I am faced
>> with the dilemma of too many plane for one hangar. My 40X32 hangar
>> (minus 7 ft in each front corner for folding doors) is too small to
>> park both the old Vtail Bonanza there and the Piet in the normal way.
>>
>> I have done a lot of math. But this looks like a real solution. please
>> look at these photos and tell me if parking the Pietenpol this way
>> will damage the engine A65 Contenental or the plane? Of course I may
>> have to drain fuel to do this. Will the engine oil be a problem?
>>
>> Blue Skies,
>>
>> Steve D.
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>>
>
> --
> Charles Burkholder
> Visit my blog @ http://missionmechfund.blogspot.ca/
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 06:48:04 AM PST US
> From: Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: builder questions
>
>
> Welcome to the list John,
>
> just got back from a trip and havne't ead all the recent posts, so I'm not sure
> what responses you've gotten so far.
>
> Dick Navratil has a Rotec on his Piet and it flies great, as do many of the Corvair
> powered ones, so both options have proved successful.
>
> I'm not personally familiar with aircraft spruce's kits, but they've been discussed
> a lot on the list and can be found in the archives, as can discussions about
> all your questions.
>
>> From the discussions I"v seen, they are FAIRLY complete, but seem to be missing
> certain pieces, but I think the quality seems good.
>
> Ken Bickers is building a Piet in your area and would be a good resource of knowledge.
> Reaching out to him would be a wise step.
>
> Fuselage length is a personal choice. most guys use and like the longer fuselage
> because there's more room in the cockpits. Unless you're pretty small, I'd
> vote for the longer fuse. Mine is the short fuselage, I'm 5'9" and 150lbs and
> the pit feels none too large, especially in winter clothes.
>
> Good luck and stay plugged in here!
>
> Douwe
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 07:00:03 AM PST US
> From: Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: flying north
>
>
> Last year I flew from northern KY to Brodhead making stops in Kokomo IN and Lowell
> Airfield in Illinois.
>
> Not sure where Kokomo is along your route, but it was a FABULOUS grass strip
with
> fuel and a nice lounge and super friendly/welcoming ownership.
>
> I'd love to hook up with some of you guys if we could rendezvous somewhere not
> too far out of anybody's way.
>
> Douwe
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 07:13:32 AM PST US
> From: "Boatright, Jeffrey" <jeffboatright@emory.edu>
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: flying north
>
>
> Hi Douwe,
>
> Do you recall which Kokomo airport? Theres OKK, Hartman, Indian Hills,
> Glenndale, etc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
>
> --
>
> Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO
> Professor of Ophthalmology
> Emory University School of Medicine
>
>
> On 6/12/14, 9:59 AM, "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
>>
>> Last year I flew from northern KY to Brodhead making stops in Kokomo IN
>> and Lowell Airfield in Illinois.
>>
>> Not sure where Kokomo is along your route, but it was a FABULOUS grass
>> strip with fuel and a nice lounge and super friendly/welcoming ownership.
>>
>> I'd love to hook up with some of you guys if we could rendezvous
>> somewhere not too far out of anybody's way.
>>
>> Douwe
>>
>>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please contact
> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
> original message (including attachments).
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 6 _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 07:53:36 AM PST US
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Flying to brodhead 2014.
> From: "tools" <n0kkj@yahoo.com>
>
>
> Jeff,
>
> If Moontown is your first stop, we could meet up at our first stop, m54, Lebanon.
> They've got a grass runway, been there a few times.
>
> We had 3 legs to Sullivan, didn't get started until noon or so and had a long
sit
> enroute. You'd have four to get that far north...
>
> Still not hung up on Sullivan, just havn't scoured the sectional for a nearby
strip
> that's grass. Maybe Shawnee (1i3)? Not sure where Drake is...
>
> Douwe,
>
> The fields you mention are a bit out of our way. Looks like you're skirting
Indianapolis
> to the north, if you do the same to the south, our paths get pretty
> close.
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424750#424750
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 7 _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 08:12:55 AM PST US
> From: shad bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: stacking planes
>
> You may get a little oil out of the front seal but as long as it is not sit
> ting on the crank it should be fine.- Put some kind of fixture on the eng
> ine mount to sit it up like that.- You will probably want to let it sit l
> evel for an hour or so to get the oil back where it is supposed to be.=0A
> =0AShad =0A=0A=0AOn Thursday, June 12, 2014 7:33 AM, Charles Burkholder <bo
> rn2fly@abcmailbox.net> wrote:=0A =0A=0A=0AUm, I will take 3 of those Cubs
> please. Nobody will miss them. LOL=0ACharles Burkholder=0A=0AOn 6/11/2014 1
> 0:42 PM, Steven Dortch wrote:=0A =0A =0A>Guys, as I get my Pietenpol Air Ca
> mper closer to flight I am faced with the dilemma of too many plane for one
> hangar. My 40X32 hangar (minus 7 ft in each front corner for folding doors
> ) is too small to park both the old Vtail Bonanza there and the Piet in the
> normal way. =0A>- =0A>I have done a lot of math. But this looks like a
> real solution. -please look at these photos and tell me if parking the P
> ietenpol this way will damage the engine A65 Contenental or the plane? Of c
> ourse I may have to drain fuel to do this. Will the engine oil be a problem
> ? =0A>- =0A>Blue Skies, =0A>Steve D. =0A> =0A> =0A>=0A>No virus found
> in this message.=0A>Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com/=0A>06/11/14 =0A
> =0A-- =0ACharles Burkholder=0AVisit my blog @ http://missionmechfund.blogsp
> ====================
>
> ________________________________ Message 8 _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 08:16:42 AM PST US
> From: "Boatright, Jeffrey" <jeffboatright@emory.edu>
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Flying to brodhead 2014.
>
>
> Hi Tools,
>
> M54 is one of two options Id been planning for my second stop I really
> prefer grass for anything other than early morning or evening landings as
> my mains are simple motorcycle wheels from some unknown 60s bike, probably
> with much less lateral strength than what is needed.
>
> Another option is that I could make Lafayette my first stop. Its about
> 1.5 hours from 2GA9, which would be a decent opening to the journey. What
> time do you hope to depart? If its super early, maybe Id fly up the
> evening before or some such.
>
> After work, Ill send you a complete list of enroute options that Ive
> been pondering and get your take on them.
>
> This is coming together nicely.
>
> Jeff
> --
>
> Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO
> Professor of Ophthalmology
> Emory University School of Medicine
>
>
> On 6/12/14, 10:53 AM, "tools" <n0kkj@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> If Moontown is your first stop, we could meet up at our first stop, m54,
>> Lebanon. They've got a grass runway, been there a few times.
>>
>> We had 3 legs to Sullivan, didn't get started until noon or so and had a
>> long sit enroute. You'd have four to get that far north...
>>
>> Still not hung up on Sullivan, just havn't scoured the sectional for a
>> nearby strip that's grass. Maybe Shawnee (1i3)? Not sure where Drake
>> is...
>>
>> Douwe,
>>
>> The fields you mention are a bit out of our way. Looks like you're
>> skirting Indianapolis to the north, if you do the same to the south, our
>> paths get pretty close.
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424750#424750
>>
>>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please contact
> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
> original message (including attachments).
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 9 _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 08:25:45 AM PST US
> From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb@comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: stacking planes
>
> Hi Steve,
> This is the way airplanes were stacked for the winter in our hangar in South
Dakota,
> but I think the oil and gas were drained.
> Jim B.
>
> ________________________________ Message 10 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 10:43:16 AM PST US
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Hinge Tail Feathers
> From: "namrednos" <namrednos@yahoo.com>
>
>
> I am about to start making my tail hinges. On the plans, 13Ga. material is called
> out with #8 screws. In the Flying Manual 16Ga. material is called out with
> 3/16" hex bolts (close to #10).
>
> Does any one have a comment.
>
> I am going to try the Bill Church method to make hinge plates without welding.
>
> Scott
>
> --------
> Scott
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424759#424759
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 11 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 10:45:45 AM PST US
> From: "G Hansen" <ghans@cable-lynx.net>
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: stacking planes
>
> Back in the early fifties I remember seeing a single row of Aeronca
> Champions stacked nose down along a hangar wall with each propeller
> resting in an old tire on the floor. The tailwheels were up against the
> hangar wall and the main wheels were not chocked. I don=99t know
> whether the fuel was drained, but am pretty sure the oil was still in
> the tank. I didn=99t know it at the time, but later (in 1953) one
> of those Champs became the first airplane I ever owned.
>
> Stacking was an effective way to free up floor space and still could be,
> provided the ceiling is high enough. Basically, stacking is for storage;
> it probably isn=99t practical for airplanes in frequent use.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Graham Hansen (Alberta, Canada)
>
>
> From: shad bell
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:12 AM
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: stacking planes
>
> You may get a little oil out of the front seal but as long as it is not
> sitting on the crank it should be fine. Put some kind of fixture on the
> engine mount to sit it up like that. You will probably want to let it
> sit level for an hour or so to get the oil back where it is supposed to
> be.
>
>
> Shad
>
>
> On Thursday, June 12, 2014 7:33 AM, Charles Burkholder
> <born2fly@abcmailbox.net> wrote:
>
>
> Um, I will take 3 of those Cubs please. Nobody will miss them. LOL
> Charles Burkholder
>
> On 6/11/2014 10:42 PM, Steven Dortch wrote:
>
> Guys, as I get my Pietenpol Air Camper closer to flight I am faced
> with the dilemma of too many plane for one hangar. My 40X32 hangar
> (minus 7 ft in each front corner for folding doors) is too small to park
> both the old Vtail Bonanza there and the Piet in the normal way.
>
> I have done a lot of math. But this looks like a real solution.
> please look at these photos and tell me if parking the Pietenpol this
> way will damage the engine A65 Contenental or the plane? Of course I may
> have to drain fuel to do this. Will the engine oil be a problem?
>
> Blue Skies,
> Steve D.
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com/
> 06/11/14
>
>
> --
> Charles Burkholder
> Visit my blog @ http://missionmechfund.blogspot.ca/
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-" target="_blank"
> rel="nofollow" shape="rect">http://forums.matronics-->
> http://www.matronics.com/contribution===========
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> 06/11/14
>
> ________________________________ Message 12 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 10:56:28 AM PST US
> From: John Greenlee <jmgreenlee@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fw: Varnish
>
> ________________________________ Message 13 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 11:21:20 AM PST US
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fw: Varnish
> From: Scott Knowlton <flyingscott_k@hotmail.com>
>
> I had a similar occurrence with Epifanes. The supplier suggested pouring it
> through a fine paint filter. The "bears" were all caught and the product w
> as returned to its clear, usable state. Good luck. Epifanes is great stuff
> .
>
> Scott K
>
> Burlington
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jun 12, 2014, at 1:58 PM, "John Greenlee" <jmgreenlee@sbcglobal.net> wr
> ote:
>>
>>
>>
>> From: John Greenlee <jmgreenlee@sbcglobal.net>;
>> To: <pietenpol-digest-list@matronics.com>;
>> Subject: Varnish
>> Sent: Thu, Jun 12, 2014 5:48:51 PM
>>
>> Help! I've got gummy bears or jelly like stuff suspended in my Epifanes (a
> high grade boat varnish). How do I reconstitute this stuff?
>>
>>
> =========================
> ========
> =========================
> ========
> =========================
> ========
> =========================
> ========
>>
>
> ________________________________ Message 14 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 11:40:21 AM PST US
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Flying to brodhead 2014.
> From: "tools" <n0kkj@yahoo.com>
>
>
> Oh even better if you can do Lafayette.
>
> Even better than that, I'll get the coordinates of a grass strip of a friend's
> about 10 mi north of there, it's only 10 minutes from my place, we can overnight
> you easily... although don't need a super early departure, just might make
> the next day a bit easier.
>
> Should be able to get your plane indoors there, we'll get some gas from Lafayette
> to fuel up.
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424764#424764
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 15 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 11:48:28 AM PST US
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Parking at Air Venture.
> From: "tools" <n0kkj@yahoo.com>
>
>
> I was contacted by the Hatz guys who have their fly in colocated with ours at
Brodhead.
> Kevin Conner (I hope I have his name right) has been working with the
> homebuilt coordinator at EAA for a couple years and finally has a "vintage homebuilt"
> sort of area set up.
>
> An area for planes like the Hatz, Fly Baby's, Tailwinds, and of course the grand
> puba of vintage homebuilts, Piets! It's a great idea.
>
> He has invited as many Piets that want to park there, to park there. There's
also
> a little "show area" where we've been invited to park a plane, so hopefully
> one of the show planes come along.
>
> He's putting together an email of exactly what the arrangement is, that I'll
repost
> as soon as I get it. If we can get some posters made, we'll display them
> there, if not, I'll just borrow the ones from the Piet hangar at Pioneer.
>
> Kevin will be at Brodhead and would like to address the entire group about what
> he has going, so all the finer details can be acquired then (like where to actually
> taxi once you land). Not a "sign up" sort of thing (the parking). Who
> ever shows, shows.
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424765#424765
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 16 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 06:33:10 PM PST US
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Flying to brodhead 2014.
> From: "tools" <n0kkj@yahoo.com>
>
>
> Oh, and Wendel's place can host as many as come along. Can probably get two,
maybe
> three in his hangar. He might be flying up as well... he's got a REALLY
> nice RV8, he'll probably take off directly for KOSH so would likely be leaving
> well after us.
>
> If anyone is in the mood to try landing at our place, can get quite a few under
> cover. Probably worth landing at Wendel's, then coming over to look over the
> field in person and then deciding for yourself. It's quite a climb after landing...
>
> However a very easy approach with no obstacles.
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424778#424778
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 17 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 06:38:36 PM PST US
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Flying to brodhead 2014.
> From: "tools" <n0kkj@yahoo.com>
>
>
> My place:
>
> The coords are: 34.833250, 085.325110
>
> The best field to fly into is either Wilson Field
> 34.869454, 085.200019i
>
> Or Wendell's place:
> 34.872324, 085.250305
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424779#424779
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 18 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 07:23:17 PM PST US
> From: "Chris" <catdesigns@att.net>
> Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fw: Varnish
>
> John
>
>
> I believe it is partially cured varnish that is in the can. This is quite
> common with varnish. It will react with the air that gets into the can when
> you open and closed multiple times. Next time pore what you need into
> another container so you can keep the can closed. Also try to remove the
> air by replacing it with something else. Some people put a small piece of
> plastic on the surface or squirt a shot of propane into the can to remove
> the air. Other things work too.
>
>
> Some people have had luck straining the clumps out while others think it is
> no longer good for a quality finish because it will leave tinny lumps.
> There is no way to reconstitute it that I know of. I think it would be ok
> if you are covering that part of the plane but I'd buy a new can if it was
> the instrument panel.
>
>
> Chris T.
>
> Sacramento, Ca
>
> Westcoastpiet.com
>
>
> From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John
> Greenlee
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 10:53 AM
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fw: Varnish
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: John Greenlee <jmgreenlee@sbcglobal.net
> <mailto:jmgreenlee@sbcglobal.net> >;
> <mailto:pietenpol-digest-list@matronics.com> >;
> Subject: Varnish
> Sent: Thu, Jun 12, 2014 5:48:51 PM
>
>
> Help! I've got gummy bears or jelly like stuff suspended in my Epifanes (a
> high grade boat varnish). How do I reconstitute this stuff?
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 19 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 08:04:22 PM PST US
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Material for wing ribs
> From: Claude Corbett <isablcorky@aol.com>
>
> Pieters,
> Last spring I wrote this group that I was beginning to build some sets of wi
> ng ribs. Many events have prevented my completing this project. I've tried t
> o make a few but I'm experiencing frustration and impatience which results i
> n inferior workmanship. Not that I think I'm a craftsman but I would not lik
> e to leave some products less than I would like. So, the purpose of this let
> ter is to offer some poor Piet builder my inventory of materials I purchased
> for this project.
> 6 pcs Douglas.Fir from Puget Sound Area, 6ftx6 in kiln dried, close vertical
> grain, no pitch pockets. The very finest I could acquire. 2 4x8 sheets boa
> t plywood for gussets and. 1 sheet of plywood for 1/8purpose.
> T 88 And nails from Wicks. 42.77
> Lumber and plywood from Eden-saw. 408.80
>
> 451.5
> 7 No more no less. FOB Shreveport, La
>
> About half the lumber has been milled down to 1/4x3/8 x 5 ft for caps trip
> A few gussets cutout.
>
> Anyone interested please contact me direct on internet or 318 455 7435
> I guarantee a real bargain
>
>
> Sent
>
> my iPad
> <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
>
>
> </b></font></pre>
>
> ________________________________ Message 20 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 08:36:51 PM PST US
> From: "Boatright, Jeffrey" <jeffboatright@emory.edu>
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: FW: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37
>
> What do you guys think of this plan? I am completely open to any alternativ
> e suggestions about airports vaguely near this flight path and any local pr
> oblems you may know of that may arise from this plan. The fields chosen all
> have turf runways (except 9A1, but Tools has given us alternative grass st
> rips nearby). Grass is not absolutely necessary, but it=92s nice. I don=92t
> know much else about these airports except I=92ve read that Frasca Field (
> C16) and Poplar Grove (C77) are neat places.
> The cities/large towns near this path are roughly: Snellville GA (2GA9), La
> fayette GA /Chattanooga (9A1), Lebanon TN (M54), Evansville/Boonville IN (I
> 91), Urbana IL (C16), Poplar Grove IL (C77), Brodhead WI (C37).
>
>
> [cid:9FD7780B-4D8D-4750-B010-5DD0D7D9800C]
> =97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97
> =97=97=97=97
> Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO
> Professor of Ophthalmology
> Emory University School of Medicine
> Sent from an iPad with a spelling problem
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please contact
> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
> original message (including attachments).
>
> ________________________________ Message 21 ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 09:12:45 PM PST US
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: stacking planes
> From: "taildrags" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
>
>
> Pretty cool! It would definitely get the attention of passers-by! If you have
> a Continental, just looking at the photos and the angle of the engine, I don't
> see how much of the oil would get out of the kidney tank into the crankcase,
> and even if it did, I don't see how it would be up into the main seal. Fuel
> would definitely be a problem with my airplane if there was more than about 3/4
> tank in it.
>
> It seems like it would be a cinch to hoist the tail from a pulley, and tying
off
> the rope would hold the airplane securely in that position. My airplane starts
> to want to go onto its nose once I raise the tail much past straight and level,
> so I would sure want a cushion or rubber tire right where the prop was going
> to touch the floor.
>
> Now that I see that, I'm thinking I may just try it out this winter!
>
> --------
> Oscar Zuniga
> Medford, OR
> Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
> A75 power
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=424785#424785
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | FW: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37 |
You will like Frasca Field and Lucile's Hot Dog Stand. The grass strip is
N/S and paved is E/W.
Might want to call as Rudy's group will be departing for Osh.
Barry
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Boatright,
Jeffrey
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 11:35 PM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: FW: ForeFlight: 2GA9 9A5 M54 I91 C16 C77 C37
What do you guys think of this plan? I am completely open to any alternative
suggestions about airports vaguely near this flight path and any local
problems you may know of that may arise from this plan. The fields chosen
all have turf runways (except 9A1, but Tools has given us alternative grass
strips nearby). Grass is not absolutely necessary, but it's nice. I don't
know much else about these airports except I've read that Frasca Field (C16)
and Poplar Grove (C77) are neat places.
The cities/large towns near this path are roughly: Snellville GA (2GA9),
Lafayette GA /Chattanooga (9A1), Lebanon TN (M54), Evansville/Boonville IN
(I91), Urbana IL (C16), Poplar Grove IL (C77), Brodhead WI (C37).
-----------------------------
Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO
Professor of Ophthalmology
Emory University School of Medicine
Sent from an iPad with a spelling problem
_____
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: stacking planes |
I have frequently used the term "stacking the hangar".- Now I know why th
at term is used.=0AShad =0A=0A=0AOn Friday, June 13, 2014 12:20 AM, taildra
gs <taildrags@hotmail.com> wrote:=0A =0A=0A=0A--> Pietenpol-List message p
osted by: "taildrags" <taildrags@hotmail.com>=0A=0APretty cool!- It would
definitely get the attention of passers-by!- If you have a Continental,
just looking at the photos and the angle of the engine, I don't see how muc
h of the oil would get out of the kidney tank into the crankcase, and even
if it did, I don't see how it would be up into the main seal.- Fuel would
definitely be a problem with my airplane if there was more than about 3/4
tank in it.=0A=0AIt seems like it would be a cinch to hoist the tail from a
pulley, and tying off the rope would hold the airplane securely in that po
sition.- My airplane starts to want to go onto its nose once I raise the
tail much past straight and level, so I would sure want a cushion or rubber
tire right where the prop was going to touch the floor.=0A=0ANow that I se
e that, I'm thinking I may just try it out this winter!=0A=0A--------=0AOsc
ar Zuniga=0AMedford, OR=0AAir Camper NX41CC "Scout"=0AA75 power
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ARead this topic online here:=0A=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.co
=============
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Would the Pieter from Tennessee please resend I his message, I accidentally destroyed,
it.
The wood is not spruce but high quality Douglas 'Fir. Also. I failed to mention
there is enough material to build 3 sets of wings. The rib jig is also complete.
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Material for wing ribs |
Pieters,
Last spring I wrote this group that I was beginning to build some sets of wi
ng ribs. Many events have prevented my completing this project. I've tried t
o make a few but I'm experiencing frustration and impatience which results i
n inferior workmanship. Not that I think I'm a craftsman but I would not lik
e to leave some products less than I would like. So, the purpose of this let
ter is to offer some poor Piet builder my inventory of materials I purchased
for this project.
6 pcs Douglas.Fir from Puget Sound Area, 6ftx6 in kiln dried, close vertical
grain, no pitch pockets. The very finest I could acquire. 2 4x8 sheets boa
t plywood for gussets and. 1 sheet of plywood for 1/8purpose.
T 88 And nails from Wicks. 42.77
Lumber and plywood from Eden-saw. 408.80
451.57
No more no less. FOB Shreveport, La
About half the lumber has been milled down to 1/4x3/8 x 5 ft for caps trip
A few gussets cutout.
Anyone interested please contact me direct on internet or 318 455 7435
I guarantee a real bargain
Would the person from Tenn please resend your message? I accidentally trashe
d it.
Sent
Oo
my iPad
<pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
</b></font></pre></body></html>
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Would the Pieter from Tennessee please resend I his message, I accidentally destroyed,
it.
The wood is not spruce but high quality Douglas 'Fir. Also. I failed to mention
there is enough material to build 3 sets of wings. The rib jig is also complete.
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|