Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:24 AM - Re: Re: engine listing (Steven Dortch)
2. 06:45 AM - Re: Air Camper plans (jarheadpilot82)
3. 07:25 AM - Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment (Michael Perez)
4. 07:42 AM - Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment (tools)
5. 07:43 AM - Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment (Brian Kenney)
6. 08:07 AM - Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment (Ken Bickers)
7. 09:37 AM - Re: Re: Air Camper plans (Dick N)
8. 10:51 AM - Re: Air Camper plans (jarheadpilot82)
9. 11:26 AM - Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment (Hans van der Voort)
10. 11:40 AM - Re: Air Camper plans (curtdm(at)gmail.com)
11. 11:43 AM - Re: Air Camper plans (jarheadpilot82)
12. 12:41 PM - Who's flying to Brodhead? (Douwe Blumberg)
13. 12:42 PM - Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment (tools)
14. 12:43 PM - BPA newsletter (Douwe Blumberg)
15. 12:47 PM - Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? (Ken Bickers)
16. 12:48 PM - If The Excitement Of Brodhead Is Still Not Enough For You (jarheadpilot82)
17. 01:00 PM - Re: BPA newsletter (John Hofmann)
18. 01:42 PM - Re: BPA newsletter (Gary Boothe)
19. 01:44 PM - Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? (Gene Rambo)
20. 02:13 PM - Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? (danhelsper@aol.com)
21. 02:23 PM - Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? (Greg Cardinal)
22. 02:27 PM - Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? (Boatright, Jeffrey)
23. 02:31 PM - =?utf-8?Q?Re:__Re:_Air_Camper_plans? (=?utf-8?Q?aviatorbell@yahoo.com?=)
24. 02:31 PM - Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? (gliderx5@comcast.net)
25. 02:36 PM - Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? (tools)
26. 04:16 PM - Re: Air Camper plans (Bill Church)
27. 05:28 PM - Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? (M. Zeke Zechini)
28. 06:09 PM - Re: Engines (Michael Weston)
29. 06:09 PM - Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment (AircamperN11MS)
30. 07:39 PM - Re: Engines (Mike McGowan)
31. 07:53 PM - Re: Re: Air Camper plans (Clif Dawson)
32. 07:58 PM - Re: Re: Air Camper plans (Clif Dawson)
33. 08:53 PM - Re: Re: Air Camper plans (Dick N)
34. 11:42 PM - Re: Air Camper plans (jarheadpilot82)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: engine listing |
I am sure hoping that jeep engine works, I love Piets and Jeeps. Kind of
like dating a supermodel with a sense of humor, who is a homebrewer.
Blue Skies,
Steve D.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:17 PM, aviken <aviken@windstream.net> wrote:
>
> I hope to add the willys jeep 134 L to that list. Working on that
> project now.
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425575#425575
>
>
--
Blue Skies,
Steve D
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
Bill,
There have been definite improvements over the years from the Flyer and Glider
plans of 1932. As an example, the center section is built completely different.
No body would joins the spars in the way it is shown in the 1932 plans. AC 4313
is a much better reference for the scarfing of joints. The lift strut attach
points, I believe, are a good bit different as well.
You will be much happier if you do not skimp, and go ahead and purchase the plans
from the Pietenpol website. In addition to the plans, you get the steel tube
plans, and, most importantly, the weight and balance data that Bernard Pietenpol
added to the later plans.
Also, and I wasn't sure from your post, are you building an Aircamper or a Sky
Scout? There are not any steel tube fuselage plans for the Sky Scout, that I know
of. If I am wrong on that point, someone please chime in-
Finally, I have attached a link to an article written by William Wynne on fuselage
construction. Not to get in a huge "urinating competition", but Dick's comment
that wood fuselages are 'stronger' than steel tube fuselages is simply not
correct, at least from a crash survivability and risk management standpoint.
Are wood fuselages strong? Absolutely. Are they crash survivable for the pilot?
Absolutely. Just ask Kevin Purtee. There are plenty of them flying, and most
Pietenpol fuselages are made of wood. However, I had to point out Dick's statement
as his opinion, not fact. Read William's writing and form your own opinion.
http://flycorvair.net/2012/11/17/steel-tube-fuselages-safe-planes-and-250mph-accidents/
I wish you the best as you make your plans.
--------
Semper Fi,
Terry Hand
Athens, GA
USMC, USMCR, ATP
BVD DVD PDQ BBQ
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425580#425580
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment |
I have the smaller aluminum wing struts from Carlson Aircraft, (1.00" X 2.44")and
will also be using their jury struts. My questions are on the use of a single
hole in each wing strut to use a 1/4" eyebolt to secure the jurys. Will this
hole compromise the strength of the strut? Would I be better off using straps
to secure the jurys?
Thanks is advance!
If God is your co-pilot...switch seats.
Mike Perez
Karetaker Aero
STILL Building...
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment |
I stressed over this as well. I decided that as long as you put a piece of aluminum
inside where the hole is, so you can safely tighten the bolt and not crush
the tube, it would be alright.
This piece inside, now gives a place for water to set that may get in the tops,
which didn't seem like a good idea and led me in favor of a smaller bushing rather
than the block.
Lastly, not sure if the strut material can be welded, if so, that seemed like a
good idea.
Since I was reusing jury struts, the process of precisely locating that hole became
problematic, so I went with the straps anyway...
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425587#425587
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment |
I don't think you need a 1/4" bolt for a jury strut and I think 3/16" shoul
d be enough. The bigger issue is the internal support if you use a pass thr
u bolt to prevent flattening the strut. One or two strong blind rivets on
one side may be better. The critical connections are the strut ends. I am
working on designing them. The limiting issue with them seems to be the cru
shing of the strut material by the thru bolts as they are in shear. To say
it another way=2C the elongation of the strut holes under maximum load. If
anyone has done this analysis I would like to hear about it.
From: speedbrake@sbcglobal.net
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment
I have the smaller aluminum wing struts from Carlson Aircraft=2C (1.00" X 2
.44") and will also be using their jury struts. My questions are on the use
of a single hole in each wing strut to use a 1/4" eyebolt to secure the ju
rys. Will this hole compromise the strength of the strut? Would I be better
off using straps to secure the jurys?
Thanks is advance!
=0A
If God is your co-pilot...switch seats.=0A
Mike Perez=0A
Karetaker Aero=0A
STILL Building...=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
============0A
============0A
============0A
============0A
=0A
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment |
My thinking on this. I'm not a structural engineer. I don't know how much
a hole through the strut near its midpoint might weaken it, nor do I know
how to calculate such a figure. I do know that the jury strut is there to
keep the strut from collapsing near its midpoint when experiencing negative
loads (i.e., when in compression). I figured that putting a hole at the
exact spot that I was trying to keep the strut from collapsing was a bad
idea. So I used straps to secure the jury struts. They were easy to make
and easy to assemble.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Brian Kenney <brian.kenney@live.ca> wrote:
> I don't think you need a 1/4" bolt for a jury strut and I think 3/16"
> should be enough. The bigger issue is the internal support if you use a
> pass thru bolt to prevent flattening the strut. One or two strong blind
> rivets on one side may be better. The critical connections are the strut
> ends. I am working on designing them. The limiting issue with them seems to
> be the crushing of the strut material by the thru bolts as they are in
> shear. To say it another way, the elongation of the strut holes under
> maximum load. If anyone has done this analysis I would like to hear about
> it.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:24:49 -0700
> From: speedbrake@sbcglobal.net
> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment
> To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
>
>
> I have the smaller aluminum wing struts from Carlson Aircraft, (1.00" X
> 2.44") and will also be using their jury struts. My questions are on the
> use of a single hole in each wing strut to use a 1/4" eyebolt to secure the
> jurys. Will this hole compromise the strength of the strut? Would I be
> better off using straps to secure the jurys?
>
> Thanks is advance!
>
> If God is your co-pilot...switch seats.
> Mike Perez
> Karetaker Aero
> STILL Building...
>
> *
>
> ==========
> st" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List>
> ==========
> http://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com>
> ==========
> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution <http://www.matronics.com/contribution>
> ==========
>
> *
>
> *
>
>
> *
>
>
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
Terry
You bit, so bring a case of beer to Brodhead and I will too.and I will bring
a concrete block also. We will put one end of the wood piece and steel
piece on the block and the other end on the ground then we will stand on
them and see what happens.
Dick N.
----- Original Message -----
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 8:44 AM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Air Camper plans
> <jarheadpilot82@hotmail.com>
>
> Bill,
>
> There have been definite improvements over the years from the Flyer and
> Glider plans of 1932. As an example, the center section is built
> completely different. No body would joins the spars in the way it is shown
> in the 1932 plans. AC 4313 is a much better reference for the scarfing of
> joints. The lift strut attach points, I believe, are a good bit different
> as well.
>
> You will be much happier if you do not skimp, and go ahead and purchase
> the plans from the Pietenpol website. In addition to the plans, you get
> the steel tube plans, and, most importantly, the weight and balance data
> that Bernard Pietenpol added to the later plans.
>
> Also, and I wasn't sure from your post, are you building an Aircamper or a
> Sky Scout? There are not any steel tube fuselage plans for the Sky Scout,
> that I know of. If I am wrong on that point, someone please chime in-
>
> Finally, I have attached a link to an article written by William Wynne on
> fuselage construction. Not to get in a huge "urinating competition", but
> Dick's comment that wood fuselages are 'stronger' than steel tube
> fuselages is simply not correct, at least from a crash survivability and
> risk management standpoint. Are wood fuselages strong? Absolutely. Are
> they crash survivable for the pilot? Absolutely. Just ask Kevin Purtee.
> There are plenty of them flying, and most Pietenpol fuselages are made of
> wood. However, I had to point out Dick's statement as his opinion, not
> fact. Read William's writing and form your own opinion.
>
> http://flycorvair.net/2012/11/17/steel-tube-fuselages-safe-planes-and-250mph-accidents/
>
> I wish you the best as you make your plans.
>
> --------
> Semper Fi,
>
> Terry Hand
> Athens, GA
>
> USMC, USMCR, ATP
> BVD DVD PDQ BBQ
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425580#425580
>
>
>
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
Dick,
My comments to Bill were only meant to point out that your comments were opinion,
not fact. My comments below are opinion, as well, so anybody reading it, please
take it as such. I am not a structural engineer (and I don't think that Dick
is either), nor did I sleep in a Holiday Inn Express last night-
Wood is strong, no doubt. Steel is as well. But when wood meets its limit it breaks
in a way that steel does not. Steel bends and gives prior to ultimate failure.
There is much less elasticity in wood than steel. All of those are layman's
terms and observation, certainly not professional terms. However, that is
why, as William Wynne noted, dragsters and cropdusters are made out of steel,
not wood. Survivability in a crash.
My only point, Dick, is that it is incorrect to make a blanket statement that wood
is stronger than steel. I don't know Bill's background. He may be a 10,000
hour ATP, or a newly-minted Sport Pilot, an experienced builder, or a new guy.
He needs to decide for himself what he wants to build. I am just pointing out
the difference between opinion and fact.
--------
Semper Fi,
Terry Hand
Athens, GA
USMC, USMCR, ATP
BVD DVD PDQ BBQ
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425604#425604
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment |
Any hole through the strut will compromise the strength of the strut.=0AIs
it enough to fail the strut ? that depends on the load, the strut dimension
s and material. Plus the-size of the hole.=0AThere is-also the added ri
sk that an-not properly finished hole creates stress risers that could ca
use damage over time.=0A=0AA strap around the strut avoids all this.=0APlus
can easily slide up or down the strut to find the right position for the j
ury strut location.=0A=0AI choose to use a strap.=0A=0AHans=0A=0ANX15KV=0AW
aller, TX =0A=0A=0AOn Friday, June 27, 2014 10:14 AM, Ken Bickers <bickers.
ken@gmail.com> wrote:=0A =0A=0A=0AMy thinking on this. -I'm not a struct
ural engineer. -I don't know how much a hole through the strut near its m
idpoint might weaken it, nor do I know how to calculate such a figure. -I
do know that the jury strut is there to keep the strut from collapsing nea
r its midpoint when experiencing negative loads (i.e., when in compression)
. -I figured that putting a hole at the exact spot that I was trying to k
eep the strut from collapsing was a bad idea. -So I used straps to secure
the jury struts. -They were easy to make and easy to assemble. --
=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Brian Kenney <brian.kenney@liv
e.ca> wrote:=0A=0AI don't think you need a 1/4" bolt for a jury strut and I
think-3/16" should be enough. The bigger issue is the internal support i
f you use a pass thru bolt to prevent flattening the strut. One or two stro
ng -blind rivets on one side may be better.- The critical connections a
re the strut ends. I am working on designing them. The limiting issue with
them seems to be the crushing of the strut material by the thru bolts as th
ey are in shear. To say it another way, the elongation of the strut holes u
nder maximum load. -If anyone has done this analysis I would like to hear
about it. =0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>________________________________=0A>Date: Fri, 2
7 Jun 2014 07:24:49 -0700=0A>From: speedbrake@sbcglobal.net=0A>Subject: Pie
tenpol-List: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment=0A>To: pietenpol-lis
t@matronics.com=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>I have the smaller aluminum wing struts from
Carlson Aircraft, (1.00" X 2.44") and will also be using their jury struts
. My questions are on the use of a single hole in each wing strut to use a
1/4" eyebolt to secure the jurys. Will this hole compromise the strength of
the strut? Would I be better off using straps to secure the jurys? =0A>=0A
>=0A> =0A>Thanks is advance! =0A>=0A>=0A>If God is your co-pilot...switch s
eats. =0A>Mike Perez =0A>Karetaker Aero =0A>STILL Building... =0A> =0A>st"
target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://
forums.matronics.com/ ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
=0A>" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
=0Atp://forums.matronics.com=0A_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contributio
=================
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
A quick experiment shows that a plane built using the steel tube plans can fly
so I suspect one made from the Flying and Glider would fly too, but like Dick
said, wood is stronger....so is steel.
--------
Curt Merdan
Flower Mound, TX
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425614#425614
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/image_152.jpg
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
Curt,
I see that your weight and balance is correct! ;-)
--------
Semper Fi,
Terry Hand
Athens, GA
USMC, USMCR, ATP
BVD DVD PDQ BBQ
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425615#425615
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Who's flying to Brodhead? |
Okay, let's see a show of hands. Who's planning on flying their Pietenpol
to Brodhead?
I'm planning on it unless the WX disallows it.
D
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment |
Strut ends for the Carlsons.
Carlson does sell 1x1 6061 aluminum to use as inserts just for this. On the small
struts, the flat area is 3/4, so you have to bevel the edges just t tad on
the 1x1 stock.
It seems you have to buy a lot though... and I did... therefore...
I'd be happy to whittle down my 6' length if anyone needs less than 6 feet (or
whatever the minimum was).
On the lower ends, I made a bridal type fitting that fit over the outside. Fit
a large custom nut on the end and overlapped the bridal so I could fit 2 AN4's
(or 5's, can't remember... it's not the strength I'm looking for, rather the
diameter of the bolt to make the hole harder to elongate) spaced about 1 1/2
apart. Those with the insert allows me to squeeze tight enough that I don't think
there's any shear on the bolts because of the friction between the strut
and the bridal part. Probably over done, the straps that make the bridal are
1/8 4130.
On the other lower ends, I just made a fixed length fitting out of two 1/8 strap
4130 pieces.
On the uppers, I used the short swiveling part out of the old steel struts. I
fit this into the insert, and continued the length of the insert further into
the strut to spread the load. I think it's around 6 or 8" long overall. It allows
the struts to align better, and is a neat installation.
Need to get some pics. I made all the fittings in a day, they weren't very labor
intensive or difficult at all.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425624#425624
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hey John,
Have the newsletters gone out? I've been away and didn't see it in the mail
pile when I returned and was wondering.
Douwe
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? |
Not this year. But next year, hell or high water. Ken
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg@earthlink.ne
t
> wrote:
> Okay, let=99s see a show of hands. Who=99s planning on flyin
g their Pietenpol
> to Brodhead?
>
>
> I=99m planning on it unless the WX disallows it.
>
>
> D
>
> *
>
===========
.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List>
===========
===========
om/contribution>
===========
>
> *
>
>
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | If The Excitement Of Brodhead Is Still Not Enough For |
You
Brodhead weekend needs no help,but I saw this on Avweb. If someone is headed to
Brodhead, it might be another stop worth visiting just up the road.
http://heavybombersweekend.splashthat.com/
--------
Semper Fi,
Terry Hand
Athens, GA
USMC, USMCR, ATP
BVD DVD PDQ BBQ
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425627#425627
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: BPA newsletter |
Yes they have. They are on the slow boat out.
On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Douwe Blumberg
<douweblumberg@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Hey John,
>
> Have the newsletters gone out? I=92ve been away and didn=92t see it
in the mail pile when I returned and was wondering.
>
> Douwe
>
>
>
>
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
.but have the newsletters gone out to the West?
Gary Boothe
NX308MB
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Hofmann
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: BPA newsletter
Yes they have. They are on the slow boat out.
On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Hey John,
Have the newsletters gone out? I've been away and didn't see it in the mail
pile when I returned and was wondering.
Douwe
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List" style="color:
purple; text-decoration:
underline;">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
purple; text-decoration: underline;">http://forums.matronics.com
style="color: purple; text-decoration:
underline;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? |
I'm trying my best!!
Gene
On Jun 27, 2014, at 3:41 PM, "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg@earthlink.net> w
rote:
> Okay, let=99s see a show of hands. Who=99s planning on flying
their Pietenpol to Brodhead?
>
> I=99m planning on it unless the WX disallows it.
>
> D
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
>
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? |
I will be there Lord willing and the creek don't rise!! Only have to make i
t over from Poplar Grove!
Dan Helsper
Puryear, TN
-----Original Message-----
From: Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
Sent: Fri, Jun 27, 2014 2:41 pm
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Who's flying to Brodhead?
Okay, let=99s see a show of hands. Who=99s planning on flying
their Pietenpol to Brodhead?
I=99m planning on it unless the WX disallows it.
D
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? |
At least two (Bob Poore and myself) coming from Minneapolis. Could be 2 or
3 other Pietenpols making the trip from this area also.
Greg Cardinal
----- Original Message -----
From: Douwe Blumberg
To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 2:41 PM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Who's flying to Brodhead?
Okay, let's see a show of hands. Who's planning on flying their Pietenpo
l to Brodhead?
I'm planning on it unless the WX disallows it.
D
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protec
tion is active.
http://www.avast.com
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? |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=
Message 23
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: ?Q?RE:_Pietenpol-List:_Re:_Air_Camper_plans? |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Message 24
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? |
The Piet's not ready yet, but I plan to fly the Tripacer in on Friday, then
on the Oshkosh Saturday. I'll have a couple latex paint panels if anyone w
ants to take a look.
Malcolm Morrison
http://wienerdogaero.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:41:23 PM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Who's flying to Brodhead?
Okay, let=99s see a show of hands. Who=99s planning on flying t
heir Pietenpol to Brodhead?
I=99m planning on it unless the WX disallows it.
D
===
Message 25
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? |
I'm still planning on it. Not sure yet if I'll be leaving the Chatt TN area Wed
or Thurs.
Continuing on to Oshkosh on Sun morning for the entire week.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425638#425638
Message 26
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
Shad,
For your sake, I hope your flow rate of warm liquids is equal to or greater than
your flow of cold liquids. (i.e. outflow greater than or equal to inflow)
BC
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425647#425647
Message 27
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Who's flying to Brodhead? |
Attending with Comanche co-owner who is building a Piet. But, in our Comanch
e. NX431LA will attend next year, too
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 27, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Ken Bickers <bickers.ken@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not this year. But next year, hell or high water. Ken
>
>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg@earthlink.
net> wrote:
>> Okay, let=99s see a show of hands. Who=99s planning on flyin
g their Pietenpol to Brodhead?
>>
>>
>>
>> I=99m planning on it unless the WX disallows it.
>>
>>
>>
>> D
>>
>>
>>
>> " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
>> tp://forums.matronics.com
>> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
>>
>
>
>
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
Message 28
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
hey douwe, there was a piet built in minnesota that had an actual buick V-8, i
can't remember the guy's name but, norm tesmar(norm?,readin this?) does.
Message 29
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Aluminum Wing Strut/Jury Strut Attachment |
Hey guys,
I have 4130 steel struts with straps for the jury struts. I think the straps are
the way to go. Piper has done it that way for more years than I am old. That's
good enough for me.
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425651#425651
Message 30
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
When I went to Rockford a very long time ago there was a Piet with two
A-65's driving contra rotating props. Mike McGowan
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Weston
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Engines
hey douwe, there was a piet built in minnesota that had an actual buick V-8,
i can't remember the guy's name but, norm tesmar(norm?,readin this?) does.
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
Message 31
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
On a Weight to weight basis spruce and most ( not all)
other softwoods are pretty much the same strength
as mild steel. So yes, "wood is as strong as steel". :-)
And the Piet wood structure has proven it's survivability
in a severe crash. Again, just ask William.
But, as you say, each of us has to be comfortable with
our own decisions.
One thought though. The entire weight, including G
forces in maneuvering and weather related, is supported
by the wing is it not?
So? What's the wing made of????? :-)
Clif
Worry gives a small thing a big shadow.
Swedish proverb
>
> Dick,
>
> My only point, Dick, is that it is incorrect to make a blanket statement
> that wood is stronger than steel. I don't know Bill's background. He may
> be a 10,000 hour ATP, or a newly-minted Sport Pilot, an experienced
> builder, or a new guy. He needs to decide for himself what he wants to
> build. I am just pointing out the difference between opinion and fact.
>
> --------
> Semper Fi,
>
> Terry Hand
> Athens, GA
Message 32
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
So why does beer go through the human body so fast?
Clif
> Shad,
> For your sake, I hope your flow rate of warm liquids is equal to or
> greater than your flow of cold liquids. (i.e. outflow greater than or
> equal to inflow)
>
> BC
Message 33
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
Terry
No offence taken but I was hoping to taking a Marine officer for a bit more
money, I will bring stuff with me to Brodhead anyway in case somebody wants
to take me up on my bet. There are liquor stores in town in case.
Dick N.
----- Original Message -----
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 12:50 PM
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Air Camper plans
> <jarheadpilot82@hotmail.com>
>
> Dick,
>
> My comments to Bill were only meant to point out that your comments were
> opinion, not fact. My comments below are opinion, as well, so anybody
> reading it, please take it as such. I am not a structural engineer (and I
> don't think that Dick is either), nor did I sleep in a Holiday Inn Express
> last night-
>
> Wood is strong, no doubt. Steel is as well. But when wood meets its limit
> it breaks in a way that steel does not. Steel bends and gives prior to
> ultimate failure. There is much less elasticity in wood than steel. All of
> those are layman's terms and observation, certainly not professional
> terms. However, that is why, as William Wynne noted, dragsters and
> cropdusters are made out of steel, not wood. Survivability in a crash.
>
> My only point, Dick, is that it is incorrect to make a blanket statement
> that wood is stronger than steel. I don't know Bill's background. He may
> be a 10,000 hour ATP, or a newly-minted Sport Pilot, an experienced
> builder, or a new guy. He needs to decide for himself what he wants to
> build. I am just pointing out the difference between opinion and fact.
>
> --------
> Semper Fi,
>
> Terry Hand
> Athens, GA
>
> USMC, USMCR, ATP
> BVD DVD PDQ BBQ
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425604#425604
>
>
>
Message 34
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Camper plans |
Dick,
Just to be clear, as well as being a point of pride, but I was an "E" before I
was an "O". But you can try and take my money any time, Dick.
Semper Fi, Marine!
--------
Semper Fi,
Terry Hand
Athens, GA
USMC, USMCR, ATP
BVD DVD PDQ BBQ
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=425661#425661
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|