Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:28 AM - Re: The 'Piet Builder's Bible' Project - Want In? (William Wynne)
     2. 06:43 AM - Ethanol (Douwe Blumberg)
     3. 06:57 AM - Re: Ethanol (Dale Johnson)
     4. 07:06 AM - Re: Ethanol (jarheadpilot82)
     5. 07:36 AM - Re: Ethanol (William Wynne)
     6. 08:00 AM - Re: Re: Ethanol (Marcus Zechini)
     7. 08:01 AM - Re: Ethanol (Marcus Zechini)
     8. 08:10 AM - Re: Ethanol (Steven Dortch)
     9. 08:21 AM - Re: Re: Ethanol (Steven Dortch)
    10. 02:14 PM - Re: The quiet after a good day in the shop..... (aviken)
    11. 02:49 PM - Re: The 'Piet Builder's Bible' Project - Want In? (DonkDoug)
    12. 04:02 PM - Hybrid Bernard Swing Arm Steerable Tailwheel (Ryan M)
    13. 05:24 PM - Re: The quiet after a good day in the shop..... (aerocarjake)
    14. 06:16 PM - Re: Re: The 'Piet Builder's Bible' Project - Want In? (Steven Dortch)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: The 'Piet Builder's Bible' Project - Want In? | 
      
      
      Jim,
      
      
      You have a noble idea, but there are some practical limitations that might even
      be applied to just the building of your own plane. I write a lot, but don't know
      the 'practical limitations' of your craft, publishing.  My craft is building
      planes so some thoughts here;
      
      
      Muir's book on VW's that Oz mentions is a master work, and it educates, but it's
      success is that Muir focused the procedures on single methods he knew to work.
      It truly is a 'bible' in the sense that most religious texts describe a single
      path to God. 
      
      
      I have found that people new to a mechanical experience are much more likely to
      experience success if they are simply presented the logic behind a proven example,
      and step by step instructions for that specific example, rather than a lot
      of optional routes that may all work but not be compatible with each other.
      Because you are in publishing, you understand the role of editor, and if you
      are yet to complete a plane, you might not be the strongest 'editor'  
      
      
      Ideally lets say you had just ten people as contributors, who had each built and
      flown their own very good Piet 500 hours as contributors. Then you broke the
      building task into 100 elements, and cataloged how each of the ten elected to
      do the 100 tasks. Sounds like a winner, but here is the rub: A new green guy
      picks the one of ten paths he likes best for each of the 100 tasks, but he doesn't
      have the experience to understand that even if his combination bolts together,
      there is a strong chance that it will work poorly, because not all permutations
      made of good ideas work together.
      
      
      BTW, people are essentially doing this right now, most without understanding this
      limitation. It is for this reason that I advise new guys to pick one well proven
      Piet, and build their own close copy of it. New guys make the mistake of
      thinking this means copying how a plane looks. What I mean is picking a mechanical
      layout, ie a fuselage length, power plant, a CG pattern, fuel system,  landing
      gear, and duplicating it mechanically. The external cosmetic looks, within
      reason, are not important to how the plane flies or if it is mechanically
      sound.  
      
      
      This is essentially the approach we have over on our "Piet-vair" group. We have
      100+ guys building planes that will all probably look different, but they are
      all patterned after a handful of mechanically proven paths. This starts early
      in the project, as we have in individual W&B page for each builder, not as something
      done later as a rude awakening after the build, but as an integrated part
      of the build itself, where it does the most good, as prevention of problems.
      The task of looking after builders is infinitely simpler if they are all using
      the same power plant, and critically, they are in the discussion, so other
      builders read their responses to understand what they don't yet follow. Guys
      lurking on websites or reading books are one way communications without the feedback
      loop that is a vital part of teaching people and learning. They often don't
      have experienced people to say 'those are good ideas, but they don't work
      together well.'
      
      
      http://flycorvair.net/2015/09/06/zen-vair-and-piet-vair-discussion-groups-your-resource/
      
      
      PS, No one in my family can dance, but Dad is a '49 graduate of "Canoe U", and
      damn it, we were all going to know how to sail well. I have also built a good
      number of boats from 8' to 30'. Here is an important difference on Planes vs Boats:
      1) On the water, the 'defecation hits the rotary oscillator' slower than
      it does in the sky. 2) Almost any collection of buoyant material will float,
      even when it will not sail at all. A collection of bad plane ideas has no 'float'
      analogy. 3) I have had to contemplate using both life jackets and parachutes,
      and at that moment, I didn't have to think of how little training I had in
      using my life jacket, I knew it would 'deploy' automatically at the surface.
      
      
      
      .ww.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=446987#446987
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Hey all,
      
      
      Would anybody truly "in the know" help me understand why ethanol fuel is
      considered a "no-no" in our type of airplane?
      
      
      I understand that the alcohol can freeze in the tank and lines, but I don't
      think that is an issue with our type of low and slow flying.
      
      
      The other problem I've heard about is "vapor lock".  What exactly is this
      and why aren't cars lining the sides of the roads because of vapor lock?
      
      
      Thanks,
      
      
      Douwe
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Douwe
      
      Cars have the fuel pump in the tank with a lot of pressure not gravity fed.
      
      Ethanol fuel will asorb water not what you want in the tank.
      
      Dale
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Douwe Blumberg 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 8:32 AM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Ethanol
      
      
        Hey all,
      
         
      
        Would anybody truly "in the know" help me understand why ethanol fuel is 
      considered a "no-no" in our type of airplane?
      
         
      
        I understand that the alcohol can freeze in the tank and lines, but I don
      't think that is an issue with our type of low and slow flying.
      
         
      
        The other problem I've heard about is "vapor lock".  What exactly is this
       and why aren't cars lining the sides of the roads because of vapor lock?
      
         
      
         
      
        Thanks,
      
         
      
        Douwe
      
      
      ---
      This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
      https://www.avast.com/antivirus
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Ethanol, as I understand it, will also eat rubber fuel lines and gaskets if they
      are not ethanol-compatible.
      
      --------
      Semper Fi,
      
      Terry Hand
      Athens, GA
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=446992#446992
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Douwe
      
      
      Let me share one first hand experience that will illustrate how this could bite
      some one. Years ago I was putting auto fuel in my wife's C-85 powered Taylorcraft.
      The next day it seemed like the cork and wire fuel gauge was lower than
      expected. Inspection shows that the fuel actually had 10% ethanol in it. The Cork
      on the wire was attacked by the ethanol content in 4 gallons of gas, left
      in the tank overnight. The bits of cork were floating on the fuel, but some of
      the reaction was laying in the gascolater.
      
      
      This shows that 100% of your fuel system must be ethanol proof is you are ever
      to use any fuel other than 100LL. I am not sure you can count on auto fuel having
      zero ethanol even when it says so. Thus everything, down to the gas cap gasket,
      the float, the gasket on the bowl of your gascolater, the O-rings in your
      fuel valve, and your lines and carb, must be tolerant of ethanol if you consider
      car gas.
      
      
      Car systems have ZERO to do with plane systems. Modern EFI cars, as pointed out
      are immune to vapor lock because they hold the fuel at pressure in the system,
      and it is circulated for cooling. Their tanks are 100% sealed and not vented,
      and they don't absorb h2o for this reason. The systems and function are so different
      that it is very bad logic to make any conclusion about ethanol in planes
      based on car experience.
      
      
      Alcohol effectively will not freeze at flying temps, it was added to the ADI water
      injection on piston airliners for that reason. The issue is that it is hydroscopic,
      and this is a factor in planes with vented fuel systems and long periods
      of inactivity.
      
      
      Vapor pressure on car fuel is very different, and this contributes both to the
      potential of carb ice and to vapor lock For those that have not seen it, my wife
      wrote this story 15 years ago, it has been reprinted many times, but it is
      still very valid today:
      
      
      http://www.flycorvair.com/carbice.html
      
      
      -ww.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=446993#446993
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Yes, it is so. Fortunately, I experienced with old tractor, not my Piet.  I
      DO run 87 octane mogas, but 'tis ethanol free. No problems, yet. 100LL does
      dirty up the fuse way more than the mogas.
      -Zeke
      GN-1 w/C-85-12
      
      On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:06 AM, jarheadpilot82 <jarheadpilot82@hotmail.com
      > wrote:
      
      > jarheadpilot82@hotmail.com>
      >
      > Ethanol, as I understand it, will also eat rubber fuel lines and gaskets
      > if they are not ethanol-compatible.
      >
      > --------
      > Semper Fi,
      >
      > Terry Hand
      > Athens, GA
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=446992#446992
      >
      >
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Terry is right, I know. It's that the ethanol will destroy o-rings, seals
      in your carb.
      
      On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Douwe Blumberg <douwe@douwestudios.com>
      wrote:
      
      > Hey all,
      >
      >
      > Would anybody truly =9Cin the know=9D help me understand why 
      ethanol fuel is
      > considered a =9Cno-no=9D in our type of airplane?
      >
      >
      > I understand that the alcohol can freeze in the tank and lines, but I
      > don=99t think that is an issue with our type of low and slow flying
      .
      >
      >
      > The other problem I=99ve heard about is =9Cvapor lock
      =9D.  What exactly is this
      > and why aren=99t cars lining the sides of the roads because of vapo
      r lock?
      >
      >
      > Thanks,
      >
      >
      > Douwe
      >
      > *
      >
      ===========
      .matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List>
      ===========
      ===========
      om/contribution>
      ===========
      >
      > *
      >
      >
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      for Continental engines the ethanol will deteriorate the seals inside our
      carbs. not sure about Model As, corvairs or other engines.
      
      Water absorbed into the ethanol is a big problem. Also vapor lock at his
      altitude (may not be an issue for us, as you mentioned.)
      
      Blue skies,
      Steve D
      
      
      On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Douwe Blumberg <douwe@douwestudios.com>
      wrote:
      
      > Hey all,
      >
      >
      > Would anybody truly =9Cin the know=9D help me understand why 
      ethanol fuel is
      > considered a =9Cno-no=9D in our type of airplane?
      >
      >
      > I understand that the alcohol can freeze in the tank and lines, but I
      > don=99t think that is an issue with our type of low and slow flying
      .
      >
      >
      > The other problem I=99ve heard about is =9Cvapor lock
      =9D.  What exactly is this
      > and why aren=99t cars lining the sides of the roads because of vapo
      r lock?
      >
      >
      > Thanks,
      >
      >
      > Douwe
      >
      > *
      >
      ===========
      .matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List>
      ===========
      ===========
      om/contribution>
      ===========
      >
      > *
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Blue Skies,
      Steve D
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Interestingly you can "wash" ethanol out of your gas by adding water!
      Seriously, that is a way to remove alcohol.
      Basic technique is to put in enough water to bond with the alcohol. then
      shake or stir the fuel to get it to bond. Then let it sit so that the
      water/alcohol mixture settles to the bottom and drain it off.
      Now you have ethanol free gas. You may want to test it for ethanol and for
      octane. Alcohol raises the octane. So removing it will drop octane. It may
      still be high enough.
      
      Blue Skies,
      Steve D
      
      On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:06 AM, jarheadpilot82 <jarheadpilot82@hotmail.com>
      wrote:
      
      > jarheadpilot82@hotmail.com>
      >
      > Ethanol, as I understand it, will also eat rubber fuel lines and gaskets
      > if they are not ethanol-compatible.
      >
      > --------
      > Semper Fi,
      >
      > Terry Hand
      > Athens, GA
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=446992#446992
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Blue Skies,
      Steve D
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: The quiet after a good day in the shop..... | 
      
      
      It is great to see someone else that appreciates the quietness of your work shop..
       I suppose it is a mixed blessing that hardly anyone ever comes to my shop
      .  Maybe it is because it is hidden behind my house in the corner of my yard.
       True I would love to see people who appreciate this little airplane and the
      effort it takes to build one .  I do love the build that is so true, but my
      goal is to fly it and not spend years on this project.  Who knows I might have
      another project in mind!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=447009#447009
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: The 'Piet Builder's Bible' Project - Want In? | 
      
      
      Jim,
      
      Have you ever read any of Tracy Kidder's books?  If he were to build a Piet and
      write about the experience it would be a classic, at least amongst airplane folks.
      It would also generate interest in home building and aviation, I suspect,
      with people who formally might not had an interest in that sort of thing.
      
      If you have not read him you might give him a try.  It may give you some ideas
      for what you are trying to do.  His book titled House would be a good one to start
      with.
      
      Doug Wright
      Stillwater, OK
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=447010#447010
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Hybrid Bernard Swing Arm Steerable Tailwheel | 
      
      Pieters,
      =C2- =C2- =C2-Are there any good plans or details out there for a com
      bination Bernard swing arm/steerable tailwheel? I really don't want to rein
      vent the (tail) wheel if someone has a good design that works. May be a goo
      d column for the newsletter if there's not one already...
      Ryan
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: The quiet after a good day in the shop..... | 
      
      
      I applaud builders like yourself who make progress quicker/more effectively and
      are not so focused on a serene workshop - well done...! So neat that this "building
      an airplane" thing can be done is so many different ways. 
      
      One important aspect for me is keeping my neighbors from being worried/concerned
      that I am building an airplane - since my shop is in the garage of my condo
      and there are people living above these garages.....
      
      --------
      Jake Schultz - curator,
      Newport Way Air Museum  (OK, it's just my home)
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=447014#447014
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: The 'Piet Builder's Bible' Project - Want In? | 
      
      Doug, how far along are you  on your post? I am based at Enid, OK (my piet
      is in San Antonio.)
      
      Steve D
      On Sep 11, 2015 4:52 PM, "DonkDoug" <douglas.wright@okstate.edu> wrote:
      
      > douglas.wright@okstate.edu>
      >
      > Jim,
      >
      > Have you ever read any of Tracy Kidder's books?  If he were to build a
      > Piet and write about the experience it would be a classic, at least amongst
      > airplane folks.  It would also generate interest in home building and
      > aviation, I suspect, with people who formally might not had an interest in
      > that sort of thing.
      >
      > If you have not read him you might give him a try.  It may give you some
      > ideas for what you are trying to do.  His book titled House would be a good
      > one to start with.
      >
      > Doug Wright
      > Stillwater, OK
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=447010#447010
      >
      >
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |