Pietenpol-List Digest Archive

Thu 11/12/15


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:27 AM - Re: Re: Rudder Post (Jack)
     2. 05:42 AM - Re: Rudder Post (namrednos)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:27:12 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Rudder Post
    From: Jack <jack@textors.com>
    Bill you nailed it! Fabricated another yesterday and naturally it's not quite right! Will get it right eventually! Sent from my iPad Jack Textor > On Nov 11, 2015, at 8:39 PM, "Bill Church" <billspiet@sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > Those are tough questions, Jack. :) > > I wouldn't be too worried about the tabs being 1" instead of 1 1/4". Since the 1934 plans don't even provide a dimension, most builders probably just eyeball it - which probably is what you did. It looks like about an inch, relatively speaking. Funny how both the FGM plans and the 1934 plans both provide incomplete information for this component - but they are incomplete in different ways. > Not sure why your mounting bolts are spaced at 5 1/2" instead of 6 1/2". One possible scenario is that you may have done the calculations, laid out the part, cut it, drilled it, and bent it, and when you were finished, in order to maintain the required height, that's just the way it worked. If you were to open up the bends to maintain 6 1/2", the height would probably be too short. And, since you most likely already have the floor drilled, there's no point in trying to change it now. > > Bill C. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=449227#449227 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:42:39 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Rudder Post
    From: "namrednos" <namrednos@yahoo.com>
    Tonyp51, the drawing is not on the plans because it is from the 1932-33 Flying Manual, Page 27. The plans are not the same as the magazine but they are close. If you look to the left at the control stick, you can see the aileron cables come off at the same place as the elevator cables, not from a horn like the plans. Scott Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=449236#449236




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pietenpol-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Pietenpol-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --