Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:59 AM - Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall (Charles N. Campbell)
     2. 04:06 AM - Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall (Greg Cardinal)
     3. 08:48 AM - Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall (Charles N. Campbell)
     4. 07:46 PM - Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall (Clif Dawson)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall | 
      
      Doc, I just ran a problem on my right-angle-triangle calculator and it
      looks like to get the 2 degrees of angle of attack the front cabane strut
      should be 1 inch longer than the rear.  Is that about what you figure it
      should be?  Chuck
      
      On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Donald A Mosher <thepietshop@gmail.com>
      wrote:
      
      > Douwe and others
      >
      > The wing stalls at about 16 degrees to the relative wind.
      >
      > I attach an explanation that will probably cause some comments.
      >
      > Doc Mosher
      >
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall | 
      
      Hi Doc,
      
      
      My plans are dated 3-26-34 and page 6 shows the front cabane strut 
      length as 21 =C2=BC=9D and the rear cabane length as 20 
      =C2=BC=9D . It also says  =9CNote: short rear strut gives 
      wing 2 deg. Incidence=9D
      
      
      Greg Cardinal
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Donald A 
      Mosher
      Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 2:57 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will 
      stall
      
      
      Douwe and others
      
      
      The wing stalls at about 16 degrees to the relative wind.
      
      
      I attach an explanation that will probably cause some comments.
      
      
      Doc Mosher
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall | 
      
      Greg, I bet I've looked at that sheet at least 100 times, and that's the
      first time I noticed that.  Thanks, Chuck
      
      On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Greg Cardinal <gcardinal@comcast.net> wrote
      :
      
      > Hi Doc,
      >
      >
      > My plans are dated 3-26-34 and page 6 shows the front cabane strut length
      > as 21 =C2=BC=9D and the rear cabane length as 20 =C2=BC=9D . 
      It also says  =9CNote: short
      > rear strut gives wing 2 deg. Incidence=9D
      >
      >
      > Greg Cardinal
      >
      >
      > *From:* owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:
      > owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Donald A Mosher
      > *Sent:* Sunday, May 1, 2016 2:57 PM
      > *To:* pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > *Subject:* Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing
      > will stall
      >
      >
      > Douwe and others
      >
      >
      > The wing stalls at about 16 degrees to the relative wind.
      >
      >
      > I attach an explanation that will probably cause some comments.
      >
      >
      > Doc Mosher
      >
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall | 
      
      Mine too. Also, on page 20 of the F&G, 1932, there's a
      drawing, upper left column, that show's the same thing.
      And states this gives 2=C2=B0 incidence.
      
      Clif
      
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Greg Cardinal 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 4:06 AM
        Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol 
      wing will stall
      
      
        Hi Doc,
      
         
      
        My plans are dated 3-26-34 and page 6 shows the front cabane strut 
      length as 21 =C2=BC=9D and the rear cabane length as 20 
      =C2=BC=9D . It also says  =9CNote: short rear strut gives 
      wing 2 deg. Incidence=9D
      
         
      
        Greg Cardinal
      
         
      
        From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Donald A 
      Mosher
        Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 2:57 PM
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing 
      will stall
      
         
      
        Douwe and others
      
         
      
        The wing stalls at about 16 degrees to the relative wind.
      
         
      
        I attach an explanation that will probably cause some comments.
      
         
      
        Doc Mosher
      
        No virus found in this message.
        Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      05/02/16
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |