---------------------------------------------------------- Pietenpol-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Mon 05/02/16: 4 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 02:59 AM - Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall (Charles N. Campbell) 2. 04:06 AM - Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall (Greg Cardinal) 3. 08:48 AM - Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall (Charles N. Campbell) 4. 07:46 PM - Re: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall (Clif Dawson) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 02:59:28 AM PST US Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall From: "Charles N. Campbell" Doc, I just ran a problem on my right-angle-triangle calculator and it looks like to get the 2 degrees of angle of attack the front cabane strut should be 1 inch longer than the rear. Is that about what you figure it should be? Chuck On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Donald A Mosher wrote: > Douwe and others > > The wing stalls at about 16 degrees to the relative wind. > > I attach an explanation that will probably cause some comments. > > Doc Mosher > ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 04:06:25 AM PST US From: "Greg Cardinal" Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall Hi Doc, My plans are dated 3-26-34 and page 6 shows the front cabane strut length as 21 =C2=BC=9D and the rear cabane length as 20 =C2=BC=9D . It also says =9CNote: short rear strut gives wing 2 deg. Incidence=9D Greg Cardinal From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Donald A Mosher Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 2:57 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall Douwe and others The wing stalls at about 16 degrees to the relative wind. I attach an explanation that will probably cause some comments. Doc Mosher ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 08:48:03 AM PST US Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall From: "Charles N. Campbell" Greg, I bet I've looked at that sheet at least 100 times, and that's the first time I noticed that. Thanks, Chuck On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Greg Cardinal wrote : > Hi Doc, > > > My plans are dated 3-26-34 and page 6 shows the front cabane strut length > as 21 =C2=BC=9D and the rear cabane length as 20 =C2=BC=9D . It also says =9CNote: short > rear strut gives wing 2 deg. Incidence=9D > > > Greg Cardinal > > > *From:* owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto: > owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Donald A Mosher > *Sent:* Sunday, May 1, 2016 2:57 PM > *To:* pietenpol-list@matronics.com > *Subject:* Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing > will stall > > > Douwe and others > > > The wing stalls at about 16 degrees to the relative wind. > > > I attach an explanation that will probably cause some comments. > > > Doc Mosher > ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 07:46:59 PM PST US From: "Clif Dawson" Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall Mine too. Also, on page 20 of the F&G, 1932, there's a drawing, upper left column, that show's the same thing. And states this gives 2=C2=B0 incidence. Clif ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Cardinal To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 4:06 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall Hi Doc, My plans are dated 3-26-34 and page 6 shows the front cabane strut length as 21 =C2=BC=9D and the rear cabane length as 20 =C2=BC=9D . It also says =9CNote: short rear strut gives wing 2 deg. Incidence=9D Greg Cardinal From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Donald A Mosher Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 2:57 PM To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: Angle of Attack t which the Pietenpol wing will stall Douwe and others The wing stalls at about 16 degrees to the relative wind. I attach an explanation that will probably cause some comments. Doc Mosher No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 05/02/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Matronics Email List Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post A New Message pietenpol-list@matronics.com UN/SUBSCRIBE http://www.matronics.com/subscription List FAQ http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm Web Forum Interface To Lists http://forums.matronics.com Matronics List Wiki http://wiki.matronics.com Full Archive Search Engine http://www.matronics.com/search 7-Day List Browse http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list Browse Digests http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list Browse Other Lists http://www.matronics.com/browse Live Online Chat! http://www.matronics.com/chat Archive Downloading http://www.matronics.com/archives Photo Share http://www.matronics.com/photoshare Other Email Lists http://www.matronics.com/emaillists Contributions http://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.