Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:58 AM - Re: Working with UHMW (tkreiner)
2. 06:20 AM - Re: Re: Working with UHMW (Jack)
3. 09:10 AM - Re: Cowl Support (john francis)
4. 10:39 AM - Re: Cowl Support (at7000ft)
5. 10:49 AM - Re: Re: Cowl Support (Jeff Martin)
6. 12:06 PM - Re: Cowl Support (taildrags)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Working with UHMW |
Jack,
Last week, I met with my Loctite rep on a completely different matter, and during
the conversation, he mentioned the development of a new adhesive that works
with polyethylene and polypropylene.
Since UHMW is in the same family as the other two polymers, it may work; as soon
as I get a product #, I'll post it in this thread.
--------
Tom Kreiner
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456438#456438
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Working with UHMW |
Thanks Tom
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 22, 2016, at 7:57 AM, tkreiner <tkreiner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Jack,
>
> Last week, I met with my Loctite rep on a completely different matter, and during
the conversation, he mentioned the development of a new adhesive that works
with polyethylene and polypropylene.
>
> Since UHMW is in the same family as the other two polymers, it may work; as soon
as I get a product #, I'll post it in this thread.
>
> --------
> Tom Kreiner
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456438#456438
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Cowl Support |
Thanks Oscar, that makes sense to me.
John
--------
John Francis
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456445#456445
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Cowl Support |
John
Since I used a front fuse fuel tank I never added the cowl support. The stiffner
made a great shelf for my coils and ignition switcher.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1Y1jVZb7qxbMkxpV2tZdkdrOHc/view?usp=sharing
Rick Holland
--------
Rick Holland
NX6819Z
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456448#456448
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Cowl Support |
I would not recommend mounting ignition coils (if thats what coils your talking
about) in the same area as the fuel tank. Spill a little fuel during refueling
or a slight leak in a seam and it could get ugly on start up .
Jeff Martin
> On May 22, 2016, at 1:39 PM, at7000ft <at7000ft@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> John
>
> Since I used a front fuse fuel tank I never added the cowl support. The stiffner
made a great shelf for my coils and ignition switcher.
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1Y1jVZb7qxbMkxpV2tZdkdrOHc/view?usp=sharing
>
> Rick Holland
>
> --------
> Rick Holland
> NX6819Z
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456448#456448
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Cowl Support |
Seeing the picture of Rick's setup reminded me to mention something to builders
who are installing a nose mounted tank. The way mine is arranged, there is little
or no room to run control cables or anything bigger than electrical wiring
from the cockpit to the engine through the firewall because the space is so
tight between the inside plywood and the fuel tank. And even when you squeak
a Bowden cable or tach cable or something else through there, when it gets to
the firewall there is wood framing that you don't want to make a hole through
so you have to offset the cable to clear it and that reduces the smoothness of
the cable movement. Not sure how to avoid that except to build a notch or offset
into the side of the tank to allow control cables to get past it and through
the firewall in a straight line.
In this picture- http://www.flysquirrel.net/piets/engine/A75final001.jpg , you can see the things that have to get past the fuel tank on the port side of my airplane. Oil temperature line, tach cable, throttle cable, and carb heat cable. The tach cable is the tightest in my setup because once it gets through the firewall it has to jog over to the tach drive connection and I didn't have much slack in the cable to make the offset. I improved the situation by adding a 90 degree fitting to the tach drive and that helped by letting the cable make a gentle 90 degree sweep instead of an S-turn.
--------
Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456453#456453
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|