---------------------------------------------------------- Pietenpol-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Sat 11/26/16: 15 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 0. 07:59 AM - Just A Few Days Left... (Matt Dralle) 1. 09:52 AM - Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension (taildrags) 2. 10:07 AM - Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension (taildrags) 3. 12:02 PM - Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension (Lostman) 4. 12:29 PM - Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension (Lostman) 5. 01:01 PM - Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension (Chris Tracy) 6. 01:34 PM - elevator cable tension (Douwe Blumberg) 7. 01:50 PM - Re: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension (Matt Paxton) 8. 02:21 PM - Re: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension ((null) raykrause) 9. 02:38 PM - Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension (Lostman) 10. 03:39 PM - Re: elevator cable tension (Lostman) 11. 03:40 PM - Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension (Lostman) 12. 07:31 PM - Re: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension ((null) raykrause) 13. 07:46 PM - Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension (taildrags) 14. 10:37 PM - Re: Steel Fuselage (nightmare) ________________________________ Message 0 _____________________________________ Time: 07:59:33 AM PST US From: Matt Dralle Subject: Pietenpol-List: Just A Few Days Left... Dear Listers, There are just a few days left for this year's List Fund Raiser. If you've been putting off making a Contribution until the last minute, well, this is it! The last minute, that is... :-) There are some GREAT new gift selections to choose from this year. I personally want at least three of them! There's probably something you can't live without too! And, best of all it supports your Lists! Please remember that there isn't any sort of commercial advertising on the Lists and the *only* means of keeping these Lists running is through your Contributions during this Fund Raiser. Let's make this a "Black Friday" for the Lists! Please make a Contribution today! http://www.matronics.com/contribution Or, drop a personal check in the mail to: Matt Dralle / Matronics 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 Thank you! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 09:52:08 AM PST US Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension From: "taildrags" Greetings, 'Lostman'- You've got an interesting airplane there. Checking the FAA registry on Six-Three-Niner-Eight, it does not list the engine type, but the photo looks like it's a Subaru. No sign of a radiator though... just all those ventilation louvers on the aft side of the cowling. Whatcha got-? About the elevator cable tension. If your Piet has the stock control cable geometry (cables pass under the pilot's seat to the walking beam behind the seat, then individual cables aft to each elevator), the cable tension will never be the same in both up and down cables and there will always be slack in the cables at some point in the travel. If you try to take out all the slack, your controls will bind and the stick will be very stiff in fore-and-aft motion. There are a couple of things you can look at. First thing is, how are the cables routed under the rear seat? Plans call for cable guide holes to be bored through the seat support, but that's pretty crude and most builders either put small pulleys there or else they provide nylon fairleads for the cables to pass through. Not essential, but helpful. Next thing is, the elevators ('flippers') themselves want to sag when the airplane is parked without the engine running, and just lifting them without any air moving over them can make the stick a bit heavy when you haul it back on the ground. That force lightens up as soon as there is propwash or forward motion through the air. Elevator cable tension: block up the elevators so they're in trail with the horizontal stabilizer and wiggle the wires. They should not be twangy at all, but they also shouldn't have much slack with the elevator in that position. At rest with the flippers down, the top cables on a stock Air Camper will be rubbing the leading edge of the horizontal stabilizer, so not much slack in those cables. Most builders add some sort of rub strips on the leading edges of the HS where the top cable runs over it (mine has pinked leather patches glued on; the leather was cut from a shoe that I found on the side of the road!) The lower cables will have noticeable slack in them in that condition. Are you in Utah, or is that the former owner? The FAA registry lists it as being in Utah, and the reason I ask is because there are Piet builders in just about every state of the union and you might be near enough to one to have them drop by your shop and take a look at the cable tension. One standout Piet person in Utah is Steve Eldredge, who is in the SLC area. Steve's green Air Camper is the one you see by the Piet listing when you go to the Matronics site. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463183#463183 ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 10:07:41 AM PST US Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension From: "taildrags" Aha. A little searching of the archives found that your airplane was Duane Woolsey's, and it is Subaru powered. A snip: > I have posted a few words here on the EA-81 in my air camper. I biult my > reduction drive from plans I purchased from RFI publishing. I am using a > single electronic ignition (crane cams XR-700) two 36MM carbs mounted on a > simple 90 degree manifold madw up from 1 3/4 inch tubing and 1/4 inch plate. > I am very pleased with this combination. It started first pull and has run > for 114 hours without a single stutter. I did spend a little time getting > the jetting right but once it was dialed in it realy runs good and gives me > great performance. The airplane will be at Broadhead this summer so if any > of you are interested drop by and get a ride or just take a look. > > Duane Woolsey NX6398 -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463184#463184 ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 12:02:43 PM PST US Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension From: "Lostman" taildrags wrote: > Greetings, 'Lostman'- > > You've got an interesting airplane there. Checking the FAA registry on Six-Three-Niner-Eight, it does not list the engine type, but the photo looks like it's a Subaru. No sign of a radiator though... just all those ventilation louvers on the aft side of the cowling. Whatcha got-? > > About the elevator cable tension. If your Piet has the stock control cable geometry (cables pass under the pilot's seat to the walking beam behind the seat, then individual cables aft to each elevator), the cable tension will never be the same in both up and down cables and there will always be slack in the cables at some point in the travel. If you try to take out all the slack, your controls will bind and the stick will be very stiff in fore-and-aft motion. > > There are a couple of things you can look at. First thing is, how are the cables routed under the rear seat? Plans call for cable guide holes to be bored through the seat support, but that's pretty crude and most builders either put small pulleys there or else they provide nylon fairleads for the cables to pass through. Not essential, but helpful. Next thing is, the elevators ('flippers') themselves want to sag when the airplane is parked without the engine running, and just lifting them without any air moving over them can make the stick a bit heavy when you haul it back on the ground. That force lightens up as soon as there is propwash or forward motion through the air. > > Elevator cable tension: block up the elevators so they're in trail with the horizontal stabilizer and wiggle the wires. They should not be twangy at all, but they also shouldn't have much slack with the elevator in that position. At rest with the flippers down, the top cables on a stock Air Camper will be rubbing the leading edge of the horizontal stabilizer, so not much slack in those cables. Most builders add some sort of rub strips on the leading edges of the HS where the top cable runs over it (mine has pinked leather patches glued on; the leather was cut from a shoe that I found on the side of the road!) The lower cables will have noticeable slack in them in that condition. > > Are you in Utah, or is that the former owner? The FAA registry lists it as being in Utah, and the reason I ask is because there are Piet builders in just about every state of the union and you might be near enough to one to have them drop by your shop and take a look at the cable tension. One standout Piet person in Utah is Steve Eldredge, who is in the SLC area. Steve's green Air Camper is the one you see by the Piet listing when you go to the Matronics site. I guess I should have included what I know about the plane. You mention Steve Eldredge, he actually flew to Oshkosh with this plane in formation. He is friends with Duane Woolsey who built the plane. I have been in contact with Duane as well, very nice gentleman. The plane is in Utah, that's where I purchased it. It seems Duane sold it to a man in Indiana who sold it back to a man in Utah. He is the one that had the accident in it, although there was never any report filed so not much to go on there. He sold it again to a younger man that only had it for one month before I purchased it from him. I at least know the full history of the plane as far as owners go, but no logsbooks at all. They were lost somewhere along the way. I suspect the gentleman that had the accident in it kept them. Seems he never throws anything away and can't find anything else that goes with the plane. I've met and talked with him as well. Sadly I live in New Jersey now so I don't have a lot of time to work on the plane unless I'm back out in Utah visiting and working on it. I realize that due to the geometry the cable tension basically has to be set to not be too slack yet not too tight. As well as allowing it to move as it should without too much stick force. When I rigged it back up the elevators would actually hang up due to the amount of pressure the cables were holding in the stick. After a little playing with them I set them about as how you describe. I figure that's about where they needed to be but wanted to get others opinion on them that have actually flown the plane. Part of the issue with the tension may be because I didn't like how the cables were routed. You can visibly see they were routed in such a way that they were chaffing fairly heavily on a wood brace. I moved them to another location where I feel they wouldn't have that issue as much. Plus they are not routed through a nylon tubing that will eliminate damage to the wood. Yes, the plane has an EA-81 Subaru engine. Duane placarded it at 100 HP, although I'm not sure it really has that much since he told me he didn't do anything to the engine other than intake, carbs, redrive and exhaust. In other words, no internal changes were made. I've dealt with Subaru engines for a long time and know this model should really only have about 80 HP stock and with dual carbs and open exhaust maybe produce 90 HP if the prop will allow it to get to it's peak torque RPM. He said it came from a car that only had around 35,000 miles so it's relatively just broken in. These are hardy engines for sure! I've flown behind a few of them and they are very smooth with a belt redrive taking all prop harmonics out of the equation. Thanks for the information, just what I was looking for! -------- I own a Teenie Two, remnants of an Avid, a KR2, hang glider and paraglider as well as my 1997 Pietenpol Air Camper. I'm also scratch building a Sonerai IIL. As a CFII/MEI I love sharing the gift of flight with just about anyone that will fly with me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463185#463185 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_3025_medium_656.jpg ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 12:29:29 PM PST US Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension From: "Lostman" Here's another picture showing the status of the project I picked up. As you can tell it's a ways from flying condition. In fact it was basically a basket case that I believe to have most parts to put it back together. There was some wood damage but nothing that I'd consider to be substantial or that will keep me from being able to fix it properly and get it flying again...eventually. It was missing the entire vertical stabilizer although I have no idea where it went or why it's missing. I built a new one since I do have plans. Luckily that is one of the few pieces of paper I have and only due to the fact that the last owner purchased a new set for this specific purpose. -------- I own a Teenie Two, remnants of an Avid, a KR2, hang glider and paraglider as well as my 1997 Pietenpol Air Camper. I'm also scratch building a Sonerai IIL. As a CFII/MEI I love sharing the gift of flight with just about anyone that will fly with me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463186#463186 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_3016_large_211.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_3015_large_480.jpg ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________ Time: 01:01:14 PM PST US From: Chris Tracy Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension Was it originally built by Duane Woolsey?=C2- The cable goint to the elevator will have some slack if built to the drawin gs. If it's =C2-too tight it will make them feel heavy. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Lostman wrote: - Hello all, First post here on Matronics. This summer I acquired a once beautiful Piete npol with some neat history. Sadly it was involved in some sore of accident but no real story behind it. I was basically a basket case of parts with a good set of wings and a fuselage that needed some wood repair. Luckily aft er a very thorough inventory and a lot of time looking over things I found I have an extremely well built aircraft. It also seems it won an award at O shkosk in 1999 after attending Brodhead. I'll try to work on posting up a r ebuild thread later. However right now I have one very elusive question. How tight should the ri gging be on the elevator control cables? I've searched all through the site and all over the internet and haven't found anything. After hooking up all cables to check over everything I found that the stick is VERY heavy. I lo osened up the cables some but then I seem to have enough slack that it worr ies me. However the stick pressure is much better than before. Anyone have any suggestions for me on this one? I've attached a picture of what the plane looked like back in 1999. It will be very similar once rebuilt. Thanks for any suggestions. Kenneth -------- I'm an airplane addict. I own a Teenie Two, remnants of an Avid, a KR2, han g glider and paraglider as well as my 1997 Pietenpol Air Camper. As a CFII/ MEI I love sharing the gift of flight with just about anyone that will fly with me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463100#463100 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/old_paint_125.jpg =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. S - WIKI - - =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________ Message 6 _____________________________________ Time: 01:34:25 PM PST US From: "Douwe Blumberg" Subject: Pietenpol-List: elevator cable tension I'd say match the tension on your other Piet. If it's been flying, can't go wrong there. Other than that, it's pretty much a "feeling" thing. you don't want them any tighter than necessary to eliminate any possibility of the elevator moving independently of the stick. We're talking about from the rocking beam back to the actual elevator. You'll find it's actually fairly loose. Prop the elevator up when adjusting or the weight of the elevator will fool you and create more tension on the upper cable Douwe ________________________________ Message 7 _____________________________________ Time: 01:50:31 PM PST US Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension From: Matt Paxton Are you the guy who was at Old Rhinebeck this past August with the nice homebuilt teardrop trailer? A lot of this story of the Piet rebuild is sounding familiar. I was one of the guys who flew up from Virginia in our Piets. Matt Paxton NX629MLOn Nov 26, 2016 3:02 PM, Lostman wrote: > > > > taildrags wrote: > > Greetings, 'Lostman'- > > > > You've got an interesting airplane there. Checking the FAA registry on Six-Three-Niner-Eight, it does not list the engine type, but the photo looks like it's a Subaru. No sign of a radiator though... just all those ventilation louvers on the aft side of the cowling. Whatcha got-? > > > > About the elevator cable tension. If your Piet has the stock control cable geometry (cables pass under the pilot's seat to the walking beam behind the seat, then individual cables aft to each elevator), the cable tension will never be the same in both up and down cables and there will always be slack in the cables at some point in the travel. If you try to take out all the slack, your controls will bind and the stick will be very stiff in fore-and-aft motion. > > > > There are a couple of things you can look at. First thing is, how are the cables routed under the rear seat? Plans call for cable guide holes to be bored through the seat support, but that's pretty crude and most builders either put small pulleys there or else they provide nylon fairleads for the cables to pass through. Not essential, but helpful. Next thing is, the elevators ('flippers') themselves want to sag when the airplane is parked without the engine running, and just lifting them without any air moving over them can make the stick a bit heavy when you haul it back on the ground. That force lightens up as soon as there is propwash or forward motion through the air. > > > > Elevator cable tension: block up the elevators so they're in trail with the horizontal stabilizer and wiggle the wires. They should not be twangy at all, but they also shouldn't have much slack with the elevator in that position. At rest with the flippers down, the top cables on a stock Air Camper will be rubbing the leading edge of the horizontal stabilizer, so not much slack in those cables. Most builders add some sort of rub strips on the leading edges of the HS where the top cable runs over it (mine has pinked leather patches glued on; the leather was cut from a shoe that I found on the side of the road!) The lower cables will have noticeable slack in them in that condition. > > > > Are you in Utah, or is that the former owner? The FAA registry lists it as being in Utah, and the reason I ask is because there are Piet builders in just about every state of the union and you might be near enough to one to have them drop by your shop and take a look at the cable tension. One standout Piet person in Utah is Steve Eldredge, who is in the SLC area. Steve's green Air Camper is the one you see by the Piet listing when you go to the Matronics site. > > > I guess I should have included what I know about the plane. You mention Steve Eldredge, he actually flew to Oshkosh with this plane in formation. He is friends with Duane Woolsey who built the plane. I have been in contact with Duane as well, very nice gentleman. > > The plane is in Utah, that's where I purchased it. It seems Duane sold it to a man in Indiana who sold it back to a man in Utah. He is the one that had the accident in it, although there was never any report filed so not much to go on there. He sold it again to a younger man that only had it for one month before I purchased it from him. I at least know the full history of the plane as far as owners go, but no logsbooks at all. They were lost somewhere along the way. I suspect the gentleman that had the accident in it kept them. Seems he never throws anything away and can't find anything else that goes with the plane. I've met and talked with him as well. Sadly I live in New Jersey now so I don't have a lot of time to work on the plane unless I'm back out in Utah visiting and working on it. > > I realize that due to the geometry the cable tension basically has to be set to not be too slack yet not too tight. As well as allowing it to move as it should without too much stick force. When I rigged it back up the elevators would actually hang up due to the amount of pressure the cables were holding in the stick. After a little playing with them I set them about as how you describe. I figure that's about where they needed to be but wanted to get others opinion on them that have actually flown the plane. Part of the issue with the tension may be because I didn't like how the cables were routed. You can visibly see they were routed in such a way that they were chaffing fairly heavily on a wood brace. I moved them to another location where I feel they wouldn't have that issue as much. Plus they are not routed through a nylon tubing that will eliminate damage to the wood. > > Yes, the plane has an EA-81 Subaru engine. Duane placarded it at 100 HP, although I'm not sure it really has that much since he told me he didn't do anything to the engine other than intake, carbs, redrive and exhaust. In other words, no internal changes were made. I've dealt with Subaru engines for a long time and know this model should really only have about 80 HP stock and with dual carbs and open exhaust maybe produce 90 HP if the prop will allow it to get to it's peak torque RPM. He said it came from a car that only had around 35,000 miles so it's relatively just broken in. These are hardy engines for sure! I've flown behind a few of them and they are very smooth with a belt redrive taking all prop harmonics out of the equation. > > Thanks for the information, just what I was looking for! > > -------- > I own a Teenie Two, remnants of an Avid, a KR2, hang glider and paraglider as well as my 1997 Pietenpol Air Camper. I'm also scratch building a Sonerai IIL. As a CFII/MEI I love sharing the gift of flight with just about anyone that will fly with me. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463185#463185 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_3025_medium_656.jpg > > ________________________________ Message 8 _____________________________________ Time: 02:21:21 PM PST US From: "(null) raykrause" Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension "Lost man", The paint scheme on your Piet is stolen from mine, although I'm just in the p rocess of finishing mine! It's amazing how people can steal things like tha t! Anyway, nice to have a twin Piet around. Ray Krause Sent from my iPad > On Nov 26, 2016, at 9:51 AM, taildrags wrote: > > > Greetings, 'Lostman'- > > You've got an interesting airplane there. Checking the FAA registry on Si x-Three-Niner-Eight, it does not list the engine type, but the photo looks l ike it's a Subaru. No sign of a radiator though... just all those ventilati on louvers on the aft side of the cowling. Whatcha got-? > > About the elevator cable tension. If your Piet has the stock control cabl e geometry (cables pass under the pilot's seat to the walking beam behind th e seat, then individual cables aft to each elevator), the cable tension will never be the same in both up and down cables and there will always be slack in the cables at some point in the travel. If you try to take out all the s lack, your controls will bind and the stick will be very stiff in fore-and-a ft motion. > > There are a couple of things you can look at. First thing is, how are the cables routed under the rear seat? Plans call for cable guide holes to be b ored through the seat support, but that's pretty crude and most builders eit her put small pulleys there or else they provide nylon fairleads for the cab les to pass through. Not essential, but helpful. Next thing is, the elevat ors ('flippers') themselves want to sag when the airplane is parked without t he engine running, and just lifting them without any air moving over them ca n make the stick a bit heavy when you haul it back on the ground. That forc e lightens up as soon as there is propwash or forward motion through the air .. > > Elevator cable tension: block up the elevators so they're in trail with th e horizontal stabilizer and wiggle the wires. They should not be twangy at a ll, but they also shouldn't have much slack with the elevator in that positi on. At rest with the flippers down, the top cables on a stock Air Camper wi ll be rubbing the leading edge of the horizontal stabilizer, so not much sla ck in those cables. Most builders add some sort of rub strips on the leadin g edges of the HS where the top cable runs over it (mine has pinked leather p atches glued on; the leather was cut from a shoe that I found on the side of the road!) The lower cables will have noticeable slack in them in that con dition. > > Are you in Utah, or is that the former owner? The FAA registry lists it a s being in Utah, and the reason I ask is because there are Piet builders in j ust about every state of the union and you might be near enough to one to ha ve them drop by your shop and take a look at the cable tension. One standou t Piet person in Utah is Steve Eldredge, who is in the SLC area. Steve's gr een Air Camper is the one you see by the Piet listing when you go to the Mat ronics site. > > -------- > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463183#463183 > > > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > > > ________________________________ Message 9 _____________________________________ Time: 02:38:00 PM PST US Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension From: "Lostman" [quote="Ray Krause"]"Lost man", The paint scheme on your Piet is stolen from mine, although I'm just in the process of finishing mine! It's amazing how people can steal things like that! Anyway, nice to have a twin Piet around. Ray Krause That paint scheme is very close to what mine had on it. In fact I will be going all red on the turtle deck when it's finished as well. Wish the picture was upside down but it appears to be a nice Scout. How far along are you now? Is it flying? Kenneth -------- I own a Teenie Two, remnants of an Avid, a KR2, hang glider and paraglider as well as my 1997 Pietenpol Air Camper. I'm also scratch building a Sonerai IIL. As a CFII/MEI I love sharing the gift of flight with just about anyone that will fly with me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463193#463193 ________________________________ Message 10 ____________________________________ Time: 03:39:47 PM PST US Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: elevator cable tension From: "Lostman" douwe(at)douwestudios.com wrote: > Id say match the tension on your other Piet. If its been flying, cant go wrong there. > > Other than that, its pretty much a feeling thing. you dont want them any tighter than necessary to eliminate any possibility of the elevator moving independently of the stick. Were talking about from the rocking beam back to the actual elevator. Youll find its actually fairly loose. Prop the elevator up when adjusting or the weight of the elevator will fool you and create more tension on the upper cable > > Douwe I kind of figured that's what I needed to do. I do appreciate the confirmation though. That's pretty much where I have the tension set now. Not sure what you mean by matching it on my "other" Piet since this is my only one. Maybe this post isn't in response to my question though. Either way, thanks. Kenneth -------- I own a Teenie Two, remnants of an Avid, a KR2, hang glider and paraglider as well as my 1997 Pietenpol Air Camper. I'm also scratch building a Sonerai IIL. As a CFII/MEI I love sharing the gift of flight with just about anyone that will fly with me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463197#463197 ________________________________ Message 11 ____________________________________ Time: 03:40:59 PM PST US Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension From: "Lostman" Yes this one was built by Duane Woosley. I've talked to and met with him about this aircraft as well. Nice gentleman and fine builder. -------- I own a Teenie Two, remnants of an Avid, a KR2, hang glider and paraglider as well as my 1997 Pietenpol Air Camper. I'm also scratch building a Sonerai IIL. As a CFII/MEI I love sharing the gift of flight with just about anyone that will fly with me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463198#463198 ________________________________ Message 12 ____________________________________ Time: 07:31:14 PM PST US From: "(null) raykrause" Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension Kenneth, Sorry the picture was upside down, I'm not sure how that works? It was right when I sent it and right when I received it, must be the Ghosts of Christmas! Yes, it is a SkyScout with a new rebuilt A-65. Its about ready to go, just need to do some paperwork, get the numbers on her and get the final inspection. All the controls are working nicely, engines runs great, just minor things like safety wire for the turnbuckles, cotter pins in castle nuts, etc. and it will fly this Spring, if not before. I will have to do some taxi tests and bone up on wheel landings in the Aeronca! Too bad you are not in CA. Thanks, Ray Krause Sent from my iPad > On Nov 26, 2016, at 2:37 PM, Lostman wrote: > > > [quote="Ray Krause"]"Lost man", > > The paint scheme on your Piet is stolen from mine, although I'm just in the process of finishing mine! It's amazing how people can steal things like that! Anyway, nice to have a twin Piet around. > > Ray Krause > > That paint scheme is very close to what mine had on it. In fact I will be going all red on the turtle deck when it's finished as well. Wish the picture was upside down but it appears to be a nice Scout. > > How far along are you now? Is it flying? > > Kenneth > > -------- > I own a Teenie Two, remnants of an Avid, a KR2, hang glider and paraglider as well as my 1997 Pietenpol Air Camper. I'm also scratch building a Sonerai IIL. As a CFII/MEI I love sharing the gift of flight with just about anyone that will fly with me. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463193#463193 > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ Message 13 ____________________________________ Time: 07:46:15 PM PST US Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Rebuilding plus questions about elevator cable tension From: "taildrags" Kenneth; If you'll notice the tail surfaces of Ray's Scout (picture it rightside up), notice that the flippers hang down when the airplane is parked, and that the top elevator cables contact the leading edge of the horizontal stabilizer. Similarly, notice that there is slack (a slight belly) in the lower cables. This is pretty much what things should look like back there. By the way, in case you weren't already aware of this resource, there is an absolute gold mine of Piet pictures and information on Chris Tracy's website, http://www.westcoastpiet.com . You can spend hours looking at pictures of every aspect of an Air Camper from first cutting of wood to Oshkosh trophy, and everything in between. Might save you some time when you are wondering how other builders have done something that you're thinking about. If you want to start with one of the best, go to Pictures, then Mike Cuy's pictures, then just go through them one by one and learn as you admire. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463202#463202 ________________________________ Message 14 ____________________________________ Time: 10:37:35 PM PST US Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steel Fuselage From: "nightmare" im building a steel tuber. happy to answer any questions. definitely a little on your own when choosing to build a steel tube. you can email me directly. pauldonahuepilot@yahoo.com -------- Paul Donahue Started 8-3-12 do not archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=463206#463206 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Matronics Email List Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post A New Message pietenpol-list@matronics.com UN/SUBSCRIBE http://www.matronics.com/subscription List FAQ http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pietenpol-List.htm Web Forum Interface To Lists http://forums.matronics.com Matronics List Wiki http://wiki.matronics.com Full Archive Search Engine http://www.matronics.com/search 7-Day List Browse http://www.matronics.com/browse/pietenpol-list Browse Digests http://www.matronics.com/digest/pietenpol-list Browse Other Lists http://www.matronics.com/browse Live Online Chat! http://www.matronics.com/chat Archive Downloading http://www.matronics.com/archives Photo Share http://www.matronics.com/photoshare Other Email Lists http://www.matronics.com/emaillists Contributions http://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.