Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:56 AM - Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? (danoliver)
2. 07:00 AM - Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? (Vincent Dunn)
3. 07:25 AM - Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? (planes&bikes)
4. 07:31 AM - Re: Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? (Gerrit-Jan Kaal)
5. 09:54 AM - Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? (john francis)
6. 11:15 AM - Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? (taildrags)
7. 11:24 AM - landing the Piet (taildrags)
8. 01:07 PM - Re: Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? ((null) raykrause)
9. 02:12 PM - Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? (GRAHAM JOHN HANSEN)
10. 03:11 PM - Re: landing the Piet (Keith Goff)
11. 03:45 PM - Re: landing the Piet (taildrags)
12. 04:00 PM - Re: landing the Piet (Boatright, Jeffrey)
13. 04:14 PM - Re: Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? (Steven Dortch)
14. 05:17 PM - Re: landing the Piet (Keith Goff)
15. 07:44 PM - Re: Re: landing the Piet ((null) raykrause)
16. 07:52 PM - Re: landing the Piet (taildrags)
17. 09:00 PM - Re: Re: landing the Piet (Steven Dortch)
18. 09:48 PM - Re: landing the Piet (taildrags)
19. 09:54 PM - TC Piet (oldbird)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? |
I check all three weekly. Each has it's merits. I like Facebook for events, progress
reports and tidbits. I enjoy the discussions on the BPA site. It's great
for inspiration and motivation. This page is my go to for technical questions,
how-tos and what-fors, and of course help deciding which improvements not to
make (all of them it seems).
--------
Dan O
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476915#476915
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? |
I'm still here! I have found this site and the West coast Piet site really valuable
during my build process. I often mine the collected posts for ideas and solutions
though I seldom leave a post myself. I don't DO FB either. FB doesn't
seem to work with my flip phone.....
Vincent Dunn, Salem OR
Sent from my iPad
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? |
I'm happy to see 11 messages today, hopefully ending the "dry spell"! I never
posted much - maybe 10 times - but I read it faithfully during my 6 year build,
and still check it perhaps weekly. As I stated in my 7/20/16 post, this is
THE SITE for builders, unmatched for personal interactions with other builders/owners
and the archival materials which will answer most any question a builder
may confront - try to find that on FACEBOOK! In my opinion, this Site, Peter
Johnson's Build & Photo Log, and WestCoastPiets are the three indispensable
guides for PIETENPOL builders.
Don Youngblood
Easley, SC
AirCamper N41YB
A75 power, 72X42 Sensenich prop
--------
Planes&Bikes
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476919#476919
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? |
+1
:-)
On 31 Dec 2017 16:26, "planes&bikes" <yb21701@juno.com> wrote:
> >
>
> I'm happy to see 11 messages today, hopefully ending the "dry spell"! I
> never posted much - maybe 10 times - but I read it faithfully during my 6
> year build, and still check it perhaps weekly. As I stated in my 7/20/16
> post, this is THE SITE for builders, unmatched for personal interactions
> with other builders/owners and the archival materials which will answer
> most any question a builder may confront - try to find that on FACEBOOK!
> In my opinion, this Site, Peter Johnson's Build & Photo Log, and
> WestCoastPiets are the three indispensable guides for PIETENPOL builders.
>
> Don Youngblood
> Easley, SC
> AirCamper N41YB
> A75 power, 72X42 Sensenich prop
>
> --------
> Planes&Bikes
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476919#476919
>
>
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? |
Good to see some activity here. Facebook is great but i dont think we have a search
feature like this list? Ill participate more here if it stays active.
--------
John Francis
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476924#476924
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? |
Charles: it takes you half a day to read my posts because I enjoy writing. However,
they say you can delete every other letter in a word and your brain still
sees enough of it to make sense. Maybe I'll try doing that and you'll be able
to get through my posts in a quarter of a day ;o)
Jeff B.: you say you haven't been as focused on the Piet. Have you thought about
seeing an ophthalmologist about that focus problem?
Steve D.: you find yourself on the Facebook page every day? And to think there
are people going to psychiatrists and doing transcendental meditation for years
in order to try to find themselves, and here you do it just by going to Facebook!
Don Y.: I agree with your short list of indispensible guides to Pietenpoling, but
I sure miss seeing Mike Cuy's excellent video "The Building & Flying of NX48MC"
on the list. Wish he would continue making it available since it is instructional,
inspirational, and entertaining, all in one.
John F.: the BPA Pietenpol list admin, Pat Weeden, was trying to work with Matt
Dralle, who of course is the admin of Matronics, to link the BPA site to the
Matronics archives so as not to lose all of that good information and searchability.
However, there are quite a number of lists on Matronics that see little
activity but continue to be archived and supported by Matt year after year.
For that reason, I never hesitate to send $$ to Matronics every year so I can
"mine" the archives and use the search engine as well.
I joined this list 16 years ago... 9/25/01... and had made 1,549 posts since joining.
About 100 a year, or two a week on average. Sounds about right. I guess
this one makes it 1,550 to end 2017 and kick off Year Seventeen on this list.
And Charles: at the rate of a half-day to read each of my posts, you will
have spent 775 days reading my posts. TWO YEARS!!! ;o) Thanks, fellows and
gals.
--------
Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476926#476926
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | landing the Piet |
Keith: you say you got your tailwheel endorsement in a Cessna 120 but that didn't
quite prepare you for landing the Piet. Now that you've gotten some time in
your Piet, what would you say was the biggest difference between landing the
120 and landing the Piet? Was it just the sensory overload of the Piet coming
down on final in an open cockpit tandem-seat aircraft as opposed to the 120
in an enclosed cabin with side-by-side seating, or perhaps the difference in
airspeed control on final of one vs. the other, or perhaps even just the yokes-vs-sticks
controls? Just curious.
--------
Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476927#476927
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? |
You damn engineers!
Ray Krause
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 31, 2017, at 11:15 AM, taildrags <taildrags@hotmail.com> wrote:
Charles: it takes you half a day to read my posts because I enjoy writing. However,
they say you can delete every other letter in a word and your brain still
sees enough of it to make sense. Maybe I'll try doing that and you'll be able
to get through my posts in a quarter of a day ;o)
Jeff B.: you say you haven't been as focused on the Piet. Have you thought about
seeing an ophthalmologist about that focus problem?
Steve D.: you find yourself on the Facebook page every day? And to think there
are people going to psychiatrists and doing transcendental meditation for years
in order to try to find themselves, and here you do it just by going to Facebook!
Don Y.: I agree with your short list of indispensible guides to Pietenpoling, but
I sure miss seeing Mike Cuy's excellent video "The Building & Flying of NX48MC"
on the list. Wish he would continue making it available since it is instructional,
inspirational, and entertaining, all in one.
John F.: the BPA Pietenpol list admin, Pat Weeden, was trying to work with Matt
Dralle, who of course is the admin of Matronics, to link the BPA site to the
Matronics archives so as not to lose all of that good information and searchability.
However, there are quite a number of lists on Matronics that see little
activity but continue to be archived and supported by Matt year after year.
For that reason, I never hesitate to send $$ to Matronics every year so I can
"mine" the archives and use the search engine as well.
I joined this list 16 years ago... 9/25/01... and had made 1,549 posts since joining.
About 100 a year, or two a week on average. Sounds about right. I guess
this one makes it 1,550 to end 2017 and kick off Year Seventeen on this list.
And Charles: at the rate of a half-day to read each of my posts, you will
have spent 775 days reading my posts. TWO YEARS!!! ;o) Thanks, fellows and
gals.
--------
Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476926#476926
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? |
Oscar,
I am glad that you have gotten the attention of members of this list! Last month
I contributed a modest amount of $ (as usual) to keep things going and lamented,
in the space provided, the low level of activity during the last few months.
I joined the list away back when Steve E. was managing it and have belonged
to it ever since and I have always thought it was a valuable device for the
exchange of ideas and expertise gained through experience. And there is the social
factor, too, which is nice to have.
Since I donated my Pietenpol to a local museum about four years ago, I have contributed
few posts and guess I am just a "lurker" nowadays. I still enjoy hearing
about people building and flying their Pietenpols, and I hope they have as
much fun as I had with mine for nearly 43 years!
Cheers,
Graham Hansen (Built and enjoyed Pietenpol CF-AUN for a long time.)
Camrose, Alberta, Canada
On 12/30/17 01:59 PM, taildrags <taildrags@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> The first 6 months of 2017 there were several hundred posts and replies to posts
on this list. These last 6 months there may have been 100 in total, and in
the last 90 days of 2017 there may have only been a dozen or two. Members of
this list have the option of posting a poll so that the members can voice their
opinions. I thought about posting a poll question asking if this list continues
to have value to anyone who's still here, but the question answers itself
since you'll only see the question if you're still here ;o)
>
> I'm on the Brodhead Pietenpol list and I pop in from time to time on the Facebook
Piet page when somebody names me in a topic or picture, but I burn too much
time on Facebook to want to stay there much. Guess I'll continue to hang out
here on Matronics to see what the new year brings. More building and more low
'n' slow flying, I hope-!
>
> --------
> Oscar Zuniga
> Medford, OR
> Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
> A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476892#476892
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: landing the Piet |
Oscar,
I think it was a combination of it all. My brain definitely tried to default to,
power in right hand and pitch in the left, many times. The biggest thing though
was in the 120 you pull power all the way out abeam the numbers on down wind,
if you do that in the Piet your gonna land on down wind. I had quite a few
embarrassing and scary landings from pulling the power out on final or even in
the flare. Finally figured out if I leave about 1500rpm in on the corvair it
will just settle down to the runway after you flare.If I land straight and pull
power off it rolls out straight and true and only lasts a few seconds.
Thanks,
Keith
> On December 31, 2017 at 2:24 PM taildrags wrote:
>
>
>
> Keith: you say you got your tailwheel endorsement in a Cessna 120 but that
didn't quite prepare you for landing the Piet. Now that you've gotten some time
in your Piet, what would you say was the biggest difference between landing
the 120 and landing the Piet? Was it just the sensory overload of the Piet coming
down on final in an open cockpit tandem-seat aircraft as opposed to the
120 in an enclosed cabin with side-by-side seating, or perhaps the difference
in airspeed control on final of one vs. the other, or perhaps even just the yokes-vs-sticks
controls? Just curious.
>
> --------
> Oscar Zuniga
> Medford, OR
> Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
> A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476927#476927
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: landing the Piet |
Keith; I get it now, yes. If I fly a traditional, conventional wide rectangular
traffic pattern at my home airport (which has an 8800' runway that is 150' wide),
if I pull the power abeam the numbers on downwind, I'll certainly be landing
it on downwind! So, if there's no traffic and I'm cleared to land when I'm
abeam the numbers, I'll pull power and commence a circling descent to the numbers
without squaring off the corners. It will feel like I'm too high and
too fast at first, but as I circle the airplane will come right on down if I hold
55-60 (depending on the wind). If there's other traffic, I'll just fly a
conventional pattern with long legs and square corners and I'll hold power on,
maybe 1700-1800, till established on final and able to judge "high or low? fast
or slow?" and make adjustments. I also have the nice option of landing long
at my home field, since my hangar is 'way down at the far end of Rwy 32. I
can keep power in, maintain a few hundred feet off the runway till I'm well down
it and past the turnoff to the main terminal, then ease the power off and put
it down closer to my hangar.
--------
Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476932#476932
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: landing the Piet |
Hm. I pull power all the way back abeam the numbers in my Piet. Maybe the difference
is pattern altitude between our two airports. Ours is 1000 AGL. If youre
interested, Ive got lots of Piet videos up on Youtube showing my patterns, fwiw.
Happy New Year!
Jeff
--
Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO
Professor of Ophthalmology
Emory University School of Medicine
Core Director & Research Biologist
Atlanta VAMC Center for Visual & Neurocognitive Rehabilitation
-----Original Message-----
From: <owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com> on behalf of Keith Goff <goffelectric@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: landing the Piet
Oscar,
I think it was a combination of it all. My brain definitely tried to default
to, power in right hand and pitch in the left, many times. The biggest thing
though was in the 120 you pull power all the way out abeam the numbers on down
wind, if you do that in
the Piet your gonna land on down wind. I had quite a few embarrassing and
scary landings from pulling the power out on final or even in the flare. Finally
figured out if I leave about 1500rpm in on the corvair it will just settle
down to the runway after you
flare.If I land straight and pull power off it rolls out straight and true
and only lasts a few seconds.
Thanks,
Keith
On December 31, 2017 at 2:24 PM taildrags wrote:
Keith: you say you got your tailwheel endorsement in a Cessna 120 but that
didn't quite prepare you for landing the Piet. Now that you've gotten some time
in your Piet, what would you say was the biggest difference between landing
the 120 and landing the Piet?
Was it just the sensory overload of the Piet coming down on final in an open
cockpit tandem-seat aircraft as opposed to the 120 in an enclosed cabin with
side-by-side seating, or perhaps the difference in airspeed control on final
of one vs. the other, or
perhaps even just the yokes-vs-sticks controls? Just curious.
--------
Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/ol-List" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronicss.matronics.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">http://forumnoopener
noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contributio=============
<http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476927#476927>
<http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476927#476927>
________________________________
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2017 - the end of the Matronics Pietenpol list? |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Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: landing the Piet |
1000AGL! That will put me at 1500'! Don't you need supplemental oxygen at t
hose altitudes......Any way I'm definitely still learning. I've watched som
e of your videos, I'll have another look now that I have some time in the p
lane.
Happy New Year!
Keith
> On December 31, 2017 at 7:00 PM "Boatright, Jeffrey" wrote:
>
>
>
> Hm. I pull power all the way back abeam the numbers in my Piet. Maybe
the difference is pattern altitude between our two airports. Ours is 1000
AGL. If you=99re interested, I=99ve got lots of Piet videos up
on Youtube showing my patterns, fwiw.
>
> Happy New Year!
>
> Jeff
>
> --
> Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO
> Professor of Ophthalmology
> Emory University School of Medicine
> Core Director & Research Biologist
> Atlanta VAMC Center for Visual & Neurocognitive Rehabilitation
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: on behalf of Keith Goff
cs.com "
> Date: Sunday, December 31, 2017 at 6:11 PM
> To: "pietenpol-list@matronics.com mailto:pietenpol-list@matronics.com
"
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: landing the Piet
>
>
> Oscar,
>
>
> I think it was a combination of it all. My brain definitely tried to
default to, power in right hand and pitch in the left, many times. The bigg
est thing though was in the 120 you pull power all the way out abeam the nu
mbers on down wind, if you do that in
> the Piet your gonna land on down wind. I had quite a few embarrassing
and scary landings from pulling the power out on final or even in the flar
e. Finally figured out if I leave about 1500rpm in on the corvair it will j
ust settle down to the runway after you
> flare.If I land straight and pull power off it rolls out straight and
true and only lasts a few seconds.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Keith
>
> On December 31, 2017 at 2:24 PM taildrags wrote:
>
>
>
> Keith: you say you got your tailwheel endorsement in a Cessna 120 but
that didn't quite prepare you for landing the Piet. Now that you've gotten
some time in your Piet, what would you say was the biggest difference betw
een landing the 120 and landing the Piet?
> Was it just the sensory overload of the Piet coming down on final in
an open cockpit tandem-seat aircraft as opposed to the 120 in an enclosed c
abin with side-by-side seating, or perhaps the difference in airspeed contr
ol on final of one vs. the other, or
> perhaps even just the yokes-vs-sticks controls? Just curious.
>
> --------
> Oscar Zuniga
> Medford, OR
> Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
> A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/ol-List" http://forums.matronics.com/ol-L
ist rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronicss.mat
ronics.com" http://www.matronicss.matronics.com rel="noopener noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://forumnoopener
> noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contributio=
============
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use o
f
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distributi
on
> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please contact
> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
> original message (including attachments).
>
============
============
============
============
============
>
>
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: landing the Piet |
Oscar,
Great information for those of us who have never flown a Piet. I have many hours
it J-3's and Aeronca. They are not quite that bad, but you just don't "cut"
the power abeam the numbers.....as many of you know. But if you do, it's FUN!
Ray Krause
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 31, 2017, at 3:44 PM, taildrags <taildrags@hotmail.com> wrote:
Keith; I get it now, yes. If I fly a traditional, conventional wide rectangular
traffic pattern at my home airport (which has an 8800' runway that is 150' wide),
if I pull the power abeam the numbers on downwind, I'll certainly be landing
it on downwind! So, if there's no traffic and I'm cleared to land when I'm
abeam the numbers, I'll pull power and commence a circling descent to the numbers
without squaring off the corners. It will feel like I'm too high and
too fast at first, but as I circle the airplane will come right on down if I hold
55-60 (depending on the wind). If there's other traffic, I'll just fly a
conventional pattern with long legs and square corners and I'll hold power on,
maybe 1700-1800, till established on final and able to judge "high or low? fast
or slow?" and make adjustments. I also have the nice option of landing long
at my home field, since my hangar is 'way down at the far end of Rwy 32. I
can keep power in, maintain a few hundred feet off t!
he runway till I'm well down it and past the turnoff to the main terminal, then
ease the power off and put it down closer to my hangar.
--------
Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476932#476932
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: landing the Piet |
Keith; I'm with you. I get a nosebleed just thinking about flying my Piet as high
as some of these guys do ;o)
Jeff; I think I've watched all the videos you've posted and have enjoyed them all,
several times. So smooth on the controls and nary a bobble. I'll have to
take another look and see just how far out your downwind track is from the field.
On our field, I have several things to watch out for... a long line of big
box stores with big parking lots on one side, and the need to stay well clear
of the tower, terminal, and airport parking on the other. That puts me a pretty
good way out from the runway, otherwise I would fly a tighter pattern and
probably do better getting it down without power. I did it all the time back
at San Geronimo in TX but that was a little uncontrolled 3000'x40' strip with
nice grass on one side and one end, and I could fly as tight a pattern as I
wanted (and often did). Pattern altitude now at my home field is 969' AGL.
Back when I was renting a Super Cub here around 2001, we had two runways available...
14/32 and 09/27. If we went up early in the morning when there was no
wind and no traffic, we could fly figure-8 patterns and get in a lot of touch-and-goes
in a short time without ever getting above about 500' AGL. Take off
on 32 and climb straight out, then commence a sweeping left turn onto final on
09. Land, roll out, then power up and climb out. Gain altitude, then commence
a sweeping left turn onto final on 18. Or fly right patterns, or mix it up
left-right. Now 09/27 is closed and we have a lot more commercial traffic, so
nowadays that would never fly (pardon the pun) with our strict tower crew here.
--------
Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476939#476939
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: landing the Piet |
Oscar, that carving approach sounds like the commercial pilot power off 180
to landing.
The goal is to pull the power, never add power and land on target -0 or
+200 feet. You do a continuous turn ensuring you don't get too low to hit
the touchdown point. Being high is ok, you can slip to lose altitude or use
your flaps. (Oops, not an Piet option). If you are low, you are sunk all
you can do is do your best to stay at best glide and hope for an updraft.
If you have to use power, you fail.
On Dec 31, 2017 5:46 PM, "taildrags" <taildrags@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Keith; I get it now, yes. If I fly a traditional, conventional wide
> rectangular traffic pattern at my home airport (which has an 8800' runway
> that is 150' wide), if I pull the power abeam the numbers on downwind, I'll
> certainly be landing it on downwind! So, if there's no traffic and I'm
> cleared to land when I'm abeam the numbers, I'll pull power and commence a
> circling descent to the numbers without squaring off the corners. It will
> feel like I'm too high and too fast at first, but as I circle the airplane
> will come right on down if I hold 55-60 (depending on the wind). If
> there's other traffic, I'll just fly a conventional pattern with long legs
> and square corners and I'll hold power on, maybe 1700-1800, till
> established on final and able to judge "high or low? fast or slow?" and
> make adjustments. I also have the nice option of landing long at my home
> field, since my hangar is 'way down at the far end of Rwy 32. I can keep
> power in, maintain a few hundred feet off t!
> he runway till I'm well down it and past the turnoff to the main
> terminal, then ease the power off and put it down closer to my hangar.
>
> --------
> Oscar Zuniga
> Medford, OR
> Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
> A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476932#476932
>
>
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: landing the Piet |
Steve;
Here's the funny part: several times when practicing short-field landings and just
trying to prove to myself how close I could put the mains right on the numbers,
I've scared myself but only long enough to realize I had just made a spectacular
landing. After closing the throttle abeam the numbers, determined not
to add power at all costs, keep my eyes focused on a fixed aim point on the
runway and make sure it doesn't move up or down in my field of view throughout
the turn and round-out to final, only to realize that the airplane was settling...
settling... can't pull back on the stick since I'm already right on the
bottom and don't want it to fall out from under me.
Hold it... hold it... don't pull up but the numbers are coming up fast-! Give
up those last few tics on the airspeed indicator just as the ground comes up and
she flares and 3-points just like I was a real flying ace. A scared flying
ace ;o) The amazing thing is that the few times this has turned out perfectly
without me chickening out and adding just a smidge of power, the mains have
touched the asphalt right between the threshold and the numbers, and you can't
get much closer to using every bit of runway than that! Why aim for the numbers
and give up all that perfectly good runway between the threshold and the numbers?
;o)
Oh, wait. Don't tell the FBO, but one time I put the tires of the 150 onto terra
firma about two feet before the threshold, and the terra wasn't too firma there.
In fact, the airplane made a sharp bump as the wheels rolled up over the
edge onto the pavement of the runway. Then there was the time (or was it two
times-?) when I re-shaped the bottom of the 150's tiedown ring by dragging it
along the asphalt while using nose-high "aerodynamic braking" to kill excess
speed and lift in an attempt to make the shortest landing ever made in a 150
in peacetime. At least I never wore clear through the bottom edge of the tiedown
ring.
Flying is so much fun, and landings are the funnest part of all! ;o)
--------
Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC "Scout"
A75 power, 72x36 Culver prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476941#476941
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Good morning from the first day of 2018.
I haven't been active on the net for maybe 5 months. I updated my kitlog page just
yesterday. Here are a few pictures of progress. Picture with one wing is taken
outside the shop. First time in open air. The shop is so small that I cannot
mount even one wing while inside.
Happy building/flying to you all.
Semih Oksay
Istanbul - Turkey
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=476942#476942
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_9407_small_197.jpg
http://forums.matronics.com//files/2017_12_14_img_9975_small_119.jpg
http://forums.matronics.com//files/2017_12_13_img_9974_small_266.jpg
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|