Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:54 AM - Props (Scott Miller)
     2. 09:06 AM - Re: Hidden antenna (LesDrag@aol.com)
     3. 09:27 AM - Re: Hidden antenna (LesDrag@aol.com)
     4. 09:40 AM - Re: Hidden antenna ()
     5. 11:52 AM - Re: Hidden antenna (LesDrag@aol.com)
     6. 09:00 PM - Re: Hidden antenna (f1rocket@telus.net)
     7. 10:49 PM - Re: Hidden antenna (LesDrag@aol.com)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Rocket-List message posted by: "Scott Miller" <scott65@quikenet.com>
      
      Does anybody have tha article, or information, on the comparison of propellers
      done by Van's in the RVAtor about comparing the Hartzell, MT, and AC props? If
      anyone has it, or knows where I could find it, please let me know. Thank's, Scott
      Miller  F-1 #123
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Hidden antenna | 
      
      --> Rocket-List message posted by: LesDrag@aol.com
      
      In a message dated 02/09/2004 10:25:35 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
      f1rocket@telus.net writes:
      Has anyone out there uses the "Advanced Aircraft Electronics High Gail 
      Aircraft 
      Antenna Systems" available at AS$?
      Esspecially the transponder antenna looks interesting.
      
      Regards,
      Jeff
      
      Why would someone advertise a "high gain" antenna.
      I thought an antenna with high gain was BAD.
      
      I found the advertisement in AC$.  Read the second sentence, again.
      "This means that composite aircraft and fabric covered aircraft ..."
      Is there a composite F-1 Rocket?  :-)
      
      Jim Ayers
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Hidden antenna | 
      
      --> Rocket-List message posted by: LesDrag@aol.com
      
      Hi All,
      
      If you want "hidden antenna's" in a metal aircraft, turn back one page in the 
      AC$ catalog to Bob Archer Aircraft Antennas.  These are hidden antennas 
      designed for metal aircraft.
      
      This antennas have a LOW VSWR, and a LOW gain.  These are both good things on 
      an aircraft.
      
      BTW, gain relates to signal direction.  A high gain would indicate a signal 
      in one direction.  A low gain would indicate a signal in all directions.
      
      On an aircraft, low gain is good.  (All direction signal.)
      On a satellite, high gain is good.  (One direction signal.)
      For a high gain antenna to be a good thing on an aircraft, perhaps the 
      question really is; "How high do you plan to fly?"
      
      Jim Ayers 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Hidden antenna | 
      
      --> Rocket-List message posted by: <klwerner@comcast.net>
      
      Would this TXP Antenna work when glued inside the very bottom of the cowl (in the
      cooling air exit scoop)
      
      do not archive
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: LesDrag@aol.com
        To: rocket-list@matronics.com
        Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:06 AM
        Subject: Re: Rocket-List: Hidden antenna
      
      
        --> Rocket-List message posted by: LesDrag@aol.com
      
        In a message dated 02/09/2004 10:25:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
        f1rocket@telus.net writes:
        Has anyone out there uses the "Advanced Aircraft Electronics High Gail 
        Aircraft
        Antenna Systems" available at AS$?
        Esspecially the transponder antenna looks interesting.
      
        Regards,
        Jeff
      
        Why would someone advertise a "high gain" antenna.
        I thought an antenna with high gain was BAD.
      
        I found the advertisement in AC$.  Read the second sentence, again.
        "This means that composite aircraft and fabric covered aircraft ..."
        Is there a composite F-1 Rocket?  :-)
      
        Jim Ayers
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Hidden antenna | 
      
      --> Rocket-List message posted by: LesDrag@aol.com
      
      According to Bob Archer, the transponder antenna needs to be 6 inches lower 
      than the firewall when mounted in the bottom of the cowl.  It doesn't seem to 
      fit for the Rocket cowl.
      
      On the other hand, I have a flush mount transponder antenna mounted in my HR2 
      fuselage on the right side just behind the main spar.
      
      Jim Ayers
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Hidden antenna | 
      
      --> Rocket-List message posted by: f1rocket@telus.net
      
      Hi Jim,
      
      Thanks for the lesson on High Gain/Low Gain.  I didn't know that (or understand
      
      that).  I wonder if the marketing group just thought that advertising Low Gain
      
      was a bad thing.  I can't see anyone ever wanting a High Gain antenna for any 
      aircraft like you mentioned.
      
      The reason I looked at these was to try and find a way to hide the transponder
      
      antenna.  In the documentation (at least on line) they say all of these 
      antennas will work in metal aircraft when mounted in the composite tips etc.
      
      I have yet to purchase my transponder, and haven't found much information on 
      line.  I was hoping I could mount the transponder antenna a ways away from the
      
      radio (probably the manual will tell me keep the run as short as possible).
      
      I know the transponder is a rather short antenna, but they keep having the 
      nasty habit of sticking into my head when I'm under the planes.  Just an 
      alternate reason as well as cutting drag.
      
      Jim, have you put the Archer antenna in your ship?  If you have, were you happy
      
      with the results?
      
      I guess bottom line:  If the results are not good, then I will drill holes in 
      my belly and mount the com and transponder down there just like most guys.
      
      Regards,
      Jeff
      
      
      Quoting LesDrag@aol.com:
      
      > --> Rocket-List message posted by: LesDrag@aol.com
      > 
      > Hi All,
      > 
      > If you want "hidden antenna's" in a metal aircraft, turn back one page in the
      > 
      > AC$ catalog to Bob Archer Aircraft Antennas.  These are hidden antennas 
      > designed for metal aircraft.
      > 
      > This antennas have a LOW VSWR, and a LOW gain.  These are both good things on
      > 
      > an aircraft.
      > 
      > BTW, gain relates to signal direction.  A high gain would indicate a signal
      > 
      > in one direction.  A low gain would indicate a signal in all directions.
      > 
      > On an aircraft, low gain is good.  (All direction signal.)
      > On a satellite, high gain is good.  (One direction signal.)
      > For a high gain antenna to be a good thing on an aircraft, perhaps the 
      > question really is; "How high do you plan to fly?"
      > 
      > Jim Ayers 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Hidden antenna | 
      
      --> Rocket-List message posted by: LesDrag@aol.com
      
      Hi Jeff,
      
      First item on antennas.
      A Bob Archer Sportcraft NAV antenna goes in one wingtip.  And the marker 
      beacon antenna goes in the same wingtip.  This is a no drag maximum effective 
      antenna installation.
      (Of course, if you don't have a VOR or 3 light marker beacon, you wouldn't 
      need either antenna.)
      
      A transponder blade antenna is an excellent compromise for minimum drag, 
      minimum protrusion and excellent communication.
      I installed a flush mount transponder antenna.  Also excellent communication. 
       However, it was a real pain to install properly.  (But I guess the first 
      installation is always like that.)
      
      The belly mounted COM antenna will work fine for moderate distances.  
      Sometimes for long distances.
      The external COM antennas work better on top of the airplane.  Except they 
      would be in the way of a sliding canopy.
      The newer wingtips don't allow the vertical height needed for Bob Archer's 
      wingtip COM antenna to really perform.  However, the wingtip COM antenna works
      
      almost as well as the belly mounted COM antenna.
      If you have the RV-4 vertical stabilizer, you can install Bob Archer's 
      vertical stabilizer COM antenna on top of the vertical stabilizer.  A fairing is
      
      required over this.  I've made a fairing for my RV-3, and for the RV-4 VS.  
      Optimum communications from this installation.
      (I haven't gotten this item up on my website, yet.)
      
      If you don't have a wingtip COM antenna installed for your radios, then the 
      wingtip COM antenna could be used for the ELT antenna.
      
      I hope this helps.
      Jim Ayers
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |