Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:59 AM - Re: CHT's and Fuel Flows (Rob Ray)
     2. 06:28 AM - Re: CHT's and Fuel Flows (Lee Logan)
     3. 08:36 AM - Re: CHT's and Fuel Flows (CalBru@aol.com)
     4. 11:33 AM - Re: CHT's and Fuel Flows (Tom Martin)
     5. 04:22 PM - Re: CHT's and Fuel Flows (Lee Logan)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: CHT's and Fuel Flows | 
      
      
      I have a 13 year old HR2 with the stock Harmon cowling and a LyCon flowed 10.4:1
      comp engine. Summer temps reached 400 CHT in extended climbs with oilreaching
      245.Cruise was 350-380 and 210 oil. I have read thatcowling outlet area should
      slightly exceed inlet area by 10%. I measured my HR2's cowling and trimmed
      6 inches off the bottom lip of the cowl.Now my CHT's at altitude running at peak
      range between310 and 348 with 180-190 oil temp. I have experimented with LOP
      and see 288-315 with oil at 170. During extended climbs in 90+ degree FL weather
      I never exceed 380 CHT (oil has reached 230 butquickly cools to below 190
      when level).
      Lycon frowns on LOP operations for the 10.4:1 comp engines, but it cools all temps
      another 20 degrees with a 5% FF reduction. 
      
       I have found even with my RV4 and 2 other Rockets I have helped with that cowling
      exit area needs to be opened up. My Dos Centavos...
      
      Rob Ray
      
      --- On Sat, 6/7/08, psiegel@fuse.net <psiegel@fuse.net> wrote:
      
      From: psiegel@fuse.net <psiegel@fuse.net>
      Subject: Rocket-List: CHT's and Fuel Flows
      
      
      On one of my early cross country flights, I had to pull back the rpm's a
      bit when I noticed one of the CHT's was getting close to my personal upper
      limit of 400'.
      
      Back home after pulling the cowl and plenum, I noticed that some of the paint
      on the cylinder heads had flaked partially blocking air flow, particularly on
      the hot cylinder head.
      
      I took great care to completely clean out all the cooling fins of any paint
      flakes or casting flash and I was amazed to see a dramatic drop in the formerly
      hot CHT! 
      
      
      I am also amazed at how operating lean of peak in economy cruise ( I NEVER run
      LOP at high power settings) drops CHT's!  Bart did a nice job right from
      his shop on my fuel flows to each cylinder...I sent my data to GAMI and they
      responded that my numbers were so close with the stock injectors that there was
      nothing they could do for me!
      
      
      A good rule of thumb with the IO-540's is at full power, take your fuel
      flow in gph and multiply by 10 (add a zero at the end of the fuel flow) and
      that will give you a pretty good idea of the horsepower you are getting.  So
      depending on compression ratio, it is normal to see takeoff fuel flows at sea
      level in the 26 to 29 gph range.
      
      Paul Siegel    Evo N4XU
      
      
            
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: CHT's and Fuel Flows | 
      
      Rob:  Do you know what the "official" measurements are with a Rocket cowl?
      What is the inlet area and standard outlet area with the lower cowl trimmed
      to the "factory" trim line?  Did you end up with something like a 1 to 1.1
      ratio with your inlet/outlet?
      
      P.S. Don't know if you know it or not, but Festus is building both an RV-8
      and a Pietenpohl!!
      
      Thanks,
      
      Lee...
      
      On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Rob Ray <smokyray@yahoo.com> wrote:
      
      >
      > I have a 13 year old HR2 with the stock Harmon cowling and a LyCon flowed
      > 10.4:1 comp engine. Summer temps reached 400 CHT in extended climbs with
      > oil reaching 245. Cruise was 350-380 and 210 oil. I have read that cowling
      > outlet area should slightly exceed inlet area by 10%. I measured my HR2's
      > cowling and  trimmed 6 inches off the bottom lip of the cowl.  Now my CHT's
      > at altitude running at peak range between 310 and 348 with 180-190 oil temp.
      > I have experimented with LOP and see 288-315 with oil at 170. During
      > extended climbs in 90+ degree FL weather I never exceed 380 CHT (oil has
      > reached 230 but quickly cools to below 190 when level).
      >  Lycon frowns on LOP operations for the 10.4:1 comp engines, but it cools
      > all temps another 20 degrees with a 5% FF reduction.
      >
      >    I have found even with my RV4 and 2 other Rockets I have helped with
      > that cowling exit area needs to be opened up. My Dos Centavos...
      >
      > Rob Ray
      >
      >
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: CHT's and Fuel Flows | 
      
      Does the theory of a 10% larger exit area vs. cowl inlet hold true for  ships 
      with pressure plenums?
      
      Thanks,  Cal
      F1
      
      
      **************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with 
      Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.      
      (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4?&NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | CHT's and Fuel Flows | 
      
      
      
       Opening up the trailing edge of the cowling, or adding louvers will lower
      engine temperatures.  I have confirmed this on a observations that I have
      made on my rockets.  This allows more air to go through the system.  In my
      experience this increased airflow is directly related to a decrease in
      airspeed. A three to four knot decrease in speed is what I have found when
      trimming back the lower cowling.
      	I was not satisfied with reduced airspeed and an article in the
      august 2003 sport aviation helped me to gain back the lost speed and improve
      cooling.  The key to the system is in the inlets.  Not so much the actual
      size but the internal shape.  The inlets need a straight or gradually
      increasing diffusion zone and then a smooth transition to the plenum.  The
      seals between the inlets and the plenum need to be as tight as possible.
      Although I have no personal experience with the round cooling air inlets
      they have two main advantages.  Number one is that they are usually located
      further forward and this allows a longer smoother transition zone.  Secondly
      it is quite a bit easier to seal the round inlets than it is the rectangular
      style.  By improve my inlets I noticed an immediate improvement in cooling.
      The decrease in cylinder temperatures was to a degree that I was able to not
      only return the aft cowl opening to the original size but I was able to
      extend the aft ramp and close the opening from stock.  The lost speed has
      been gained back, plus a little (maybe) but the engine now runs where I want
      it;330 to 380CHT depending on OAT and power settings.  Oil temps are in the
      190 range.
      	The conclusion that I have come to with my experiments is that there
      is not much in the way of speed gains to be made with the stock cowlings but
      significant improvements in cooling are attainable.  I believe the stock
      rocket cowlings are quite efficient.  Some day I will try some round inlets
      just to see if there are any improvements to be had there.  I suspect that
      if you have a good stock system then there probably is not much to be
      gained, but I would like to confirm that suspicion.  Currently my combined
      inlet size is 37" and my outlet area is 48".  I do have a cowl flap but have
      found that it is really only useful in the cold winter months in keeping the
      engine warm during descents.  This is the second plane that I have installed
      a cowl flap on and both instances I could find no speed benefits. (It looks
      kinda cool, and that must be worth something!)
      
      Tom Martin
      C-GEVO   The EVO 1, 230 hours
      
      
      Checked by AVG. 
      AM
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: CHT's and Fuel Flows | 
      
      Great info (as usual), Tom.  Thanks for taking the time to type that all
      out!
      
      
      Lee...
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |