Rocket-List Digest Archive

Tue 09/09/08


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:59 AM - Re: Wanted: RV4/Rocket HS and elevator..........and SPEED!!!! (ACTIVE NZ - Andrew)
     2. 06:13 AM - elevators (Frazier, Vincent A)
     3. 06:21 AM - Re: Wanted: RV4/Rocket HS and elevator..........and SPEED!!!! (Smoky Ray)
     4. 09:06 AM - Re: elevators (Im7shannon@aol.com)
     5. 10:03 AM - Re: elevators (Michael W Stewart)
     6. 09:03 PM - Re: elevators (lesdrag@aol.com)
     7. 09:03 PM - Re: elevators (lesdrag@aol.com)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:59:22 AM PST US
    Subject: Wanted: RV4/Rocket HS and elevator..........and SPEED!!!!
    From: "ACTIVE NZ - Andrew" <andrew@nzactive.com>
    Um. Clearly Smokey got in first, but if he's not interested, I might be. I've long been a little concerned about the tail on my Rocket. Hard to keep the thing below VA or VNO, in turbulence, when she's so FAST :) Incidentally, Tom's post has me thinking. I'm not sure how his Rocket is only good for 170 knots, but I'm presume there's a good reason. I've always thought mine was a tad slower than the numbers I've been reading - when people ask me how fast I cruise, I tell them, being pathologically honest, I cruise at 199 knots TAS. I've read about Rockets that cruise a lot faster than that...210 knots seems to be a common figure. I can't get more than 200 knots TAS under any circumstances, maybe 205 at sea level, 2700 RPM, WOT and full rich, which is an expensive way to get another 5 knots. I've got a Lycon IO540 C4B5, slightly tweaked to produce 280 hp, and a light (VFR) airframe. Anyone got any thoughts on how to get another 10 knots out of her? I HAVE noted one thing which makes me wonder. At any sort of cruise, there seems to be quite significant forward elevator. The front part of the elevator (the horn?) seems to be an inch or so above the front of the HS. If I was to tweak the incidence of my HS somehow, to get to a point that the elevator is neutral at high speed cruise, would that likely make her a little faster? I have two aerials, but otherwise a clean airframe. Anyone got any ideas on getting a little more speed? Feel free to email me offlist, andrew at active new zealand dot com. (Anti spam version - u guys can figure it out :) Also, GREAT to see the outputs from the OSH safety seminar. Lots of food for thought. Thanks very much, everyone who contributed... Andrew PS standing invite to New Zealand for Rocketeers is always there. Best Rocket flying in the world is down here in little old New Zealand, I reckon, if you'll excuse the parochialism. As you guys head into winter, if you're keen on a cool holiday and some kick-ass flying, well, you're talking to the right guy! Google Active New Zealand, or add a dot com at the end, and check out the sort of stuff we get up to down here in NZ. The hiking's great....but the flying's sublime!!! -----Original Message----- From: owner-rocket-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rocket-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Lundin Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Rocket-List: Wanted: RV4/Rocket HS and elevator... If your interested in an RV 8 tail let me know. Best regards, Rick Lundin --- On Mon, 9/8/08, Smoky Ray <smokyray@rocketmail.com> wrote: > From: Smoky Ray <smokyray@rocketmail.com> > Subject: Rocket-List: Wanted: RV4/Rocket HS and elevator... > To: rocket-list@matronics.com > Date: Monday, September 8, 2008, 11:10 AM Extreme hangar rash has > claimed my right elevator. Since mine is an early one, all of the > surfaces were .016 and I have decided to put a new tail on. Anybody > have a spare? :) > > Rob Ray "Smokey" > HR2


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:13:17 AM PST US
    Subject: elevators
    From: "Frazier, Vincent A" <VFrazier@usi.edu>
    SNIP***** I've heard it adds 2 knots in comparision to the RV-4 elevator counterweighted tips. Regards, Jim Ayers ******SNIP I'm dying to know who swapped elevators and made these tests on the same day, under the same conditions, and is a good enough pilot to measure 2 knots accurately. I am skeptical that either tip would offer any real speed, although the RV-4 tips should be lighter due to longer arm... but even that isn't much. If it's speed you're after, maybe that old RV-4 tail IS the way to go. It's got a shorter VS that, in theory, should be less drag. Vince - RV-4 tail, and like it.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:21:10 AM PST US
    From: Smoky Ray <smokyray@rocketmail.com>
    Subject: Wanted: RV4/Rocket HS and elevator..........and SPEED!!!!
    It's yours Andrew, thanks to Rick for advertising them. I'm building a set of larger RV4 elevators. According to someone who built a set, it makes the Rockets pitch authority similar to a light nose RV4. I'm also purchasing a HS from a friend who built an RV4 tail with the F-1 mods. -More speed is cool, but maneuverability, pitch control at low speed (lan ding on my 1800' strip!) are higher on my list. Heck, mine will do 200 knot s on the deck at 27 squared now, big tires, old airframe, 15 year old decea sed insects and all. Been to NZ, neat place, next time I'll call! Fair Dinkum! Smokey --- On Tue, 9/9/08, ACTIVE NZ - Andrew <andrew@nzactive.com> wrote: From: ACTIVE NZ - Andrew <andrew@nzactive.com> Subject: RE: Rocket-List: Wanted: RV4/Rocket HS and elevator..........and S PEED!!!! <andrew@nzactive.com> Um. Clearly Smokey got in first, but if he's not interested, I might be. I've long been a little concerned about the tail on my Rocket. Hard to keep the thing below VA or VNO, in turbulence, when she's so FAST :) Incidentally, Tom's post has me thinking. I'm not sure how his Rocket is only good for 170 knots, but I'm presume there's a good reason. I've always thought mine was a tad slower than the numbers I've been reading - when people ask me how fast I cruise, I tell them, being pathologically honest, I cruise at 199 knots TAS. I've read about Rockets that cruise a lot faster than that...210 knots seems to be a common figure. I can't get more than 200 knots TAS under any circumstances, maybe 205 at sea level, 2700 RPM, WOT and full rich, which is an expensive way to get another 5 knots. I've got a Lycon IO540 C4B5, slightly tweaked to produce 280 hp, and a light (VFR) airframe. Anyone got any thoughts on how to get another 10 knots out of her? I HAVE noted one thing which makes me wonder. At any sort of cruise, there seems to be quite significant forward elevator. The front part of the elevator (the horn?) seems to be an inch or so above the front of the HS. If I was to tweak the incidence of my HS somehow, to get to a point that the elevator is neutral at high speed cruise, would that likely make her a little faster? I have two aerials, but otherwise a clean airframe. Anyone got any ideas on getting a little more speed? Feel free to email me offlist, andrew at active new zealand dot com. (Anti spam version - u guys can figure it out :) Also, GREAT to see the outputs from the OSH safety seminar. Lots of food for thought. Thanks very much, everyone who contributed... Andrew PS standing invite to New Zealand for Rocketeers is always there. Best Rocket flying in the world is down here in little old New Zealand, I reckon, if you'll excuse the parochialism. As you guys head into winter, if you're keen on a cool holiday and some kick-ass flying, well, you're talking to the right guy! Google Active New Zealand, or add a dot com at the end, and check out the sort of stuff we get up to down here in NZ. The hiking's great....but the flying's sublime!!! -----Original Message----- From: owner-rocket-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rocket-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Lundin Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Rocket-List: Wanted: RV4/Rocket HS and elevator... <rlundin46@yahoo.com> If your interested in an RV 8 tail let me know. Best regards, Rick Lundin --- On Mon, 9/8/08, Smoky Ray <smokyray@rocketmail.com> wrote: > From: Smoky Ray <smokyray@rocketmail.com> > Subject: Rocket-List: Wanted: RV4/Rocket HS and elevator... > To: rocket-list@matronics.com > Date: Monday, September 8, 2008, 11:10 AM Extreme hangar rash has > claimed my right elevator. Since mine is an early one, all of the > surfaces were .016 and I have decided to put a new tail on. Anybody > have a spare? :) > > Rob Ray "Smokey" > HR2 =0A=0A=0A


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:06:11 AM PST US
    From: Im7shannon@aol.com
    Subject: Re: elevators
    I think the diffrence is in the trailing edge construction, a sharp point VS the rounded over blunt end of bent sheet metal. That is what made the RV 9 faster than they expected. Think of the difference if all the control surfaces were done that way. Makes sense to me. Kevin Shannon SNIP***** I've heard it adds 2 knots in comparision to the RV-4 elevator counterweighted tips. Regards, Jim Ayers ******SNIP I'm dying to know who swapped elevators and made these tests on the same day, under the same conditions, and is a good enough pilot to measure 2 knots accurately. I am skeptical that either tip would offer any real speed, although the RV-4 tips should be lighter due to longer arm... but even that isn't much. If it's speed you're after, maybe that old RV-4 tail IS the way to go. It's got a shorter VS that, in theory, should be less drag. Vince - RV-4 tail, and like it. **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:03:47 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: elevators
    From: Michael W Stewart <mike.stewart@us.ibm.com>
    "?Think of the difference if all the control surfaces were done that wa y." Nooooo. There is a reason they are NOT all done that way. The speed does not come for free. You get a significant increase in con trol input required to deflect at higher speed. Mike Im7shannon@aol.co m Sent by: To owner-rocket-list rocket-list@matronics.com -server@matronics cc .com Subj ect Re: Rocket-List: elevators 09/09/2008 12:05 PM Please respond to rocket-list@matro nics.com I think the diffrence is in the trailing edge construction, a sharp poi nt VS the rounded over blunt end of bent sheet metal. That is what made th e RV 9 faster than they expected. Think of the difference if all the control surfaces were done that way. Makes sense to me. Kevin Shannon SNIP***** I've heard it adds 2 knots in comparision to the RV-4 elevato r counterweighted tips. Regards, Jim Ayers ******SNIP I'm dying to know who swapped elevators and made these tests on the sam e day, under the same conditions, and is a good enough pilot to measure 2 knots accurately. I am skeptical that either tip would offer any real speed, although the RV-4 tips should be lighter due to longer arm... bu t even that isn't much. If it's speed you're after, maybe that old RV-4 tail IS the way to go. It's got a shorter VS that, in theory, should be less drag. Vince - RV-4 tail, and like it. Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. ======================== ============ ======================== ============ ======================== ============ ======================== ============


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:03:31 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: elevators
    From: lesdrag@aol.com
    I didn't do the testing for that data.? However, using density altitude and a consistent test procedure works pretty good. Jim Ayers -----Original Message----- From: Frazier, Vincent A <VFrazier@usi.edu> Sent: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 6:11 am Subject: Rocket-List: elevators SNIP***** I've heard it adds 2 knots in comparision to the RV-4 elevator counterweighted tips. Regards, Jim Ayers ******SNIP I'm dying to know who swapped elevators and made these tests on the same day, under the same conditions, and is a good enough pilot to measure 2 knots accurately. I am skeptical that either tip would offer any real speed, although the RV-4 tips should be lighter due to longer arm... but even that isn't much. If it's speed you're after, maybe that old RV-4 tail IS the way to go. It's got a shorter VS that, in theory, should be less drag. Vince - RV-4 tail, and like it.


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:03:31 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: elevators
    From: lesdrag@aol.com
    The same round trailing edge was used on both sets of elevators. Jim Ayers -----Original Message----- From: Im7shannon@aol.com Sent: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 9:05 am Subject: Re: Rocket-List: elevators I think the diffrence is in the trailing edge construction, a sharp point VS the rounded over blunt end of bent sheet metal. That is what made the RV 9 faster than they expected. Think of the difference if all the control surfaces were done that way. Makes sense to me. Kevin Shannon ? SNIP***** I've heard it adds 2 knots in comparision to the RV-4 elevator counterweighted tips. Regards, Jim Ayers ******SNIP I'm dying to know who swapped elevators and made these tests on the same day, under the same conditions, and is a good enough pilot to measure 2 knots accurately.? I am skeptical that either tip would offer any real speed, although the RV-4 tips should be lighter due to longer arm... but even that isn't much. If it's speed you're after, maybe that old RV-4 tail IS the way to go. It's got a shorter VS that, in theory, should be less drag. Vince - RV-4 tail, and like it. ? Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rocket-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Rocket-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rocket-list
  • Browse Rocket-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rocket-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --