Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:30 AM - Re: Fuming Mad! (N395V)
2. 10:47 AM - Re: Re: Fuming Mad! (johntmey@aol.com)
3. 05:54 PM - Re: Fuming Mad! (Speedy11@aol.com)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
> So tell me what does this mean for us peons?
>
>
It means elections have consequences.
Someone running for office recently said America is the greatest nation on earth.
Vote for me and I will give you change you can believe in.
Well change you got.
--------
Milt
2003 F1 Rocket
2006 Radial Rocket
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247933#247933
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
General Aviation is in real trouble.
Issues are fuel, national insecurity, cost, public disinterest, public perception,
population pressure,
?demographic change, politics,?etc.
And there is no constitutional right to "bear transport"
(...as in 'right to bear arms")
I soloed in July 1961, age 16, and took this freedom (to fly) for granted during
most of my productive life.
Now, I'm too old to be an activist...
Just watching "it" slip away.
John Meyers HR II N5800
-----Original Message-----
From: N395V <Bearcat@bearcataviation.com>
Sent: Sat, Jun 13, 2009 6:29 am
Subject: Rocket-List: Re: Fuming Mad!
> So tell me what does this mean for us peons?
>
>
It means elections have consequences.
Someone running for office recently said America is the greatest nation on
earth. Vote for me and I will give you change you can believe in.
Well change you got.
--------
Milt
2003 F1 Rocket
2006 Radial Rocket
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=247933#247933
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Nico is RIGHT.
We cannot stand for this.
The question is - what to do?
Stan Sutterfield
Folks,
I am fuming mad.
The Long Beach action against private citizens is an atrocity. One can
understand if there were concerns for suspicious or dangerous persons on
that flight, but from all accounts this was a flight by all standards
similar to an outing with the family in one's automobile in the
countryside.
Some brainless twit in Long Beach with a jackboot fetish decided to show
his
or her prowess that day and ordered a full-scale scare initiative. I was
taught from childhood that you don't point a firearm at anybody unless you
are prepared to use it. There is no justification for assuming otherwise
with law enforcement.
Shame on Kelly Ivahnenko for defending this outrageous behavior of the
rogue
priests of covert fascism. What would you have done, Kelly, if one of the
drawn weapons discharged accidentally? Or, suppose one of the passengers
lowered his hand to open the door or prevent from stumbling trying to get
out of the plane under extreme duress and one of the officers perceived
that
as reaching for a weapon? I can already hear your sheepish and inadequate
response by extrapolating it from your answer here. What a shameful thing
to
defend! Those who do not advocate for your dismissal and those at Long
Beach, for incompetence, is just as guilty.
Stressing that this experience is not what most pilots should expect when
they are checked by the CBP is a shameful and ignorant statement,
insulting
everybody's intelligence including yours. Tell us, then, Kelly, what should
pilots expect when they are checked by the CBP? What percentage could
expect
drawn weapons pointed at their parents or children that happen to be with
them that day? And don't say that it will happen only when there is
justified belief of a suspicious passenger or pilot involved because you
already defended an action where such prior knowledge was not present; on
the contrary, all indications were that there were no suspicious persons on
board that flight. If your agency embarked on a course to totally destroy
general aviation, you have certainly shown the methods by which you want to
accomplish that goal.
I would sue their friggin' pants off, Perry, not to inhibit legitimate
pursuit of security but to eradicate this and exactly this kind of
tyranny.
Nico
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
JunestepsfooterNO62)
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|