RotaxEngines-List Digest Archive

Thu 01/14/10


Total Messages Posted: 24



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:31 AM - Re: Fuel pump failure (Mike Hoffman)
     2. 05:32 AM - Re: Re: Fuel pump failure ()
     3. 05:47 AM - Fuel pump failure (Joe Spencer)
     4. 06:24 AM - Re: Fuel pump failure (Roger Lee)
     5. 07:43 AM - Fuel pump failure (Joe Spencer)
     6. 08:34 AM - Re: Fuel pump failure (Roger Lee)
     7. 09:10 AM - Fuel pump failure (Joe Spencer)
     8. 09:56 AM - Re: Fuel pump failure (Guy Buchanan)
     9. 10:39 AM - Annual  (Jim Hazen)
    10. 10:52 AM - Re: Annual (Richard Girard)
    11. 11:03 AM - Re: Annual (Jim Hazen)
    12. 11:04 AM - Re: Fuel pump failure (Roger Lee)
    13. 11:24 AM - Re: Annual (Bob Comperini)
    14. 12:25 PM - Re: Annual (Roger Lee)
    15. 12:41 PM - Re: Re: Fuel pump failure ()
    16. 12:45 PM - Fuel pump failure (Joe Spencer)
    17. 01:33 PM - Re: Annual (Richard Girard)
    18. 02:04 PM - Re: Fuel pump failure (Roger Lee)
    19. 04:47 PM - Fuel pump failure (Joe Spencer)
    20. 04:54 PM - Re: Fuel pump failure (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F3hann_J=F3hannsson?=)
    21. 05:38 PM - Re: Fuel pump failure (Craig Payne)
    22. 05:53 PM - Fuel pump failure (Joe Spencer)
    23. 06:09 PM - Re: Fuel pump failure (Ken Ryan)
    24. 06:38 PM - Re: Fuel pump failure (Roger Lee)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:31:30 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    From: "Mike Hoffman" <mhoffman9@tampabay.rr.com>
    Yes, my pump failed at 8 hours. It was leaking fuel from the pump body vent hole. I found fuel stain on the front of my cowl and engine. I was told by lockwood aviation that is a problem with the pumps and that 1 out of 4 are bad. I have been waiting for my new pump since before Christmas and was told it could be 1 or 2 more weeks. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=281402#281402


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:32:53 AM PST US
    From: <ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com>
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    Hi mike You can obtain a better quality pump from http://www.billetpump.com TBO of more than 2800 hours ivor ---- Mike Hoffman <mhoffman9@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > Yes, my pump failed at 8 hours. It was leaking fuel from the pump body vent hole. I found fuel stain on the front of my cowl and engine. I was told by lockwood aviation that is a problem with the pumps and that 1 out of 4 are bad. I have been waiting for my new pump since before Christmas and was told it could be 1 or 2 more weeks. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=281402#281402 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:47:08 AM PST US
    From: "Joe Spencer" <jpspencer@cableone.net>
    Subject: Fuel pump failure
    >Hi Joe, >The normal fuel pressure is anywhere from 2.2 (low) -5.8 (max) psi. Most run from 3.2-4.6 psi. If yours has been higher that's ok, but a fuel pressure between 3.1 - 4.6 is very normal. Mine is only 3.4 - 3.6 psi. The other thing is where is your fuel pressure sensor mounted? Do you have a fuel pressure dampener in line between the sender and the panel? If your fuel pressure sender is mounted on top of the fuel cross over line between the carbs then vibration is your enemy and many people are remote mounting them which is Rotax approved. One last thing are you a high wing or low wing and are you running an electric auxiliary pump? -------- Roger Lee Thanks for the replies and info...it's not so much the psi the pump is putting out as the fact that the psi is fluctuating (between 4.2 and 5.0 psi). My gauge is a direct read gauge with the pressure pickoff just upstream of the left carb. The plane is a Zenith 701. Yes I do have a backup electric pump that puts out 3 psi; and also have gravity feed as long as the pitch attitude isn't too high. The fluctuating pressure reading is unaffected by the electric pump being either on or off, as expected, as long as the pressure is above the 3 psi the electric pump puts out. The thing quit on me last week in level flight straight and level...fuel pressure was zero at the time of the stoppage with both pumps on, indicating either out of gas, stopped up vents or a blockage or leak somewhere. After getting it on the ground, the vents were open and I stuck the tanks and both of them had enough fuel to feed in level flight. I pulled the hood and leak checked it with the electric pump, no leaks.Pulled the fuel filter and cleaned it, it was a little grungy and is suspect...ran it up a while on the ground and all was normal with steady pressure, was able to get it the 3 miles to the strip altho the fuel pressure started fluctuating enroute. Have troubleshot everything and haven't found anything but the fuel filter so far...but am wondering if there have been instances of a failing engine driven pump possibly causing some sort of blockage in the pump while failing and also wondering if fluctuating pressure is a known early warning of impending failure with this pump. It should have gravity fed unless the fuel filter was indeed blocked or the pump was somehow blocked Thanks again Joe


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:24:58 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1@yahoo.com>
    Hi Joe, Even if the mechanical pump failed the electric pump should have been more than adequate. The mechanical pumps fail open. So if the mechanical pump quit and you still ran dry then I think you have a blockage somewhere or for some reason a vent issue. A blockage can move back and forth within a line depending on fuel demand. At high flow times it flows to a choke point, when little fuel is on demand or the engine is shut off it can move or float away from the choke point until you demand a lot of flow again. I would double check my vents and flow fuel through all my fuel lines into a can or something to flush them. I would also check my carb float bowls as they can have tattletale signs of crud. This doesn't sound like a pump problem. -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated Rotax Repair Center 520-574-1080 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=281422#281422


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:43:04 AM PST US
    From: "Joe Spencer" <jpspencer@cableone.net>
    Subject: Fuel pump failure
    >Even if the mechanical pump failed the electric pump should have been more than adequate. Thanks. Agreed. Also, it should have gravity fed. >The mechanical pumps fail open This is what I was looking for. Thanks for that info. I have gravity feed checked everything up to the mechanical pump and am just waiting for the hangar to warm up and will do that this morning. The pressure fluctuation is attitude related...when lowering the nose the pressure increases from about 4.2 to about 4.7 or 4.8. Makes me think there is something floating around in there that is blocking feed but have checked everything from the mechanical pump back and it's all clean. The vents are definitely open, there's no water in anything. As an aside, I am wondering about not running a mechanical pump now, what with gravity feed available. I could install 2 electric pumps for redundancy for steep takeoffs/climb outs where it wouldn't gravity feed and block off the mechanical pump pad.I should be able to get home on gravity feed if it total electric fails...do you know of any problems with blocking it off and not running the pump? Thanks again Joe


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:34:58 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1@yahoo.com>
    There are people that do not have the mechanical pump and have a solid gasket/plate over the opening and only run electric pumps. I saw a 914 like this the other day on a Zenith 701. Way over powered. -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated Rotax Repair Center 520-574-1080 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=281471#281471


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:11 AM PST US
    From: "Joe Spencer" <jpspencer@cableone.net>
    Subject: Fuel pump failure
    Well after fooling with this thing all morning I learned a few things that I thought I would pass along... It's a Zenith 701 high wing with a 912s. It should gravity feed and does but after going thru the fuel valve, fuel filter, electric pump and mechanical pump there is so little flow at the carb that I now don't consider it to be gravity feed capable. The stream out of the line just before the carb is tiny, less than the diameter of a pencil lead...and weak. Some of you older guys might know what I'm talking about here. The filter is one of the i think it's a purolator ones with the glass bowl and cast chrome body and a plastic screen inside. They've been around forever and I always liked them for certain apps. But the cast body means rather thick walled nipples and a small flow hole, further restricting the flow. I subbed in a length of 1/4 OD .035 wall tube for the filter and the flow is still too weak for comfort for this old guy... FWIW Joe


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:56:53 AM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    At 09:05 AM 1/14/2010, you wrote: >The filter is one of the i think it's a purolator ones with the >glass bowl and cast chrome body and a plastic screen inside. I've had problems with these "gumming up". Try a new filter element and see if the flow is any different. Don't know why they blocked but I had it happen the three of them. Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 400 hrs. and counting


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:39:10 AM PST US
    From: Jim Hazen <jlhazen@copper.net>
    Subject: Annual
    Can an LSA Repairman do annual inspections on an SLSA? Jim Hazen


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:52:14 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Annual
    From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng@gmail.com>
    If you took the 16 hour course (LSARI), no. If you took the 120 hour course (LSARM), yes. Rick Girard On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Jim Hazen <jlhazen@copper.net> wrote: > > Can an LSA Repairman do annual inspections on an SLSA? > Jim Hazen > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:03:41 AM PST US
    From: Jim Hazen <jlhazen@copper.net>
    Subject: Annual
    Can someone else with a LSARM certificate do an annual on my plane. -----Original Message----- From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:51 Subject: Re: RotaxEngines-List: Annual If you took the 16 hour course (LSARI), no. If you took the 120 hour course (LSARM), yes. Rick Girard On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Jim Hazen <jlhazen@copper.net> wrote: > > Can an LSA Repairman do annual inspections on an SLSA? > Jim Hazen > > [The entire original message is not included]


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:04:21 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1@yahoo.com>
    Hi Joe, I'm with Guy. First thing is toss the old filter element. Then go back at the start of the flow at the fuel tank and start finding out why it is such a weak flow. If I open my gasolator my fuel just pours out and a solid stream which is before the pump. Then pop off the float bowls and see what kind of flow there is at that point. Start at point "A" and work you way through the system until you can say this is my choke point or obstruction. I bet along the way you'll find something. Is this something that just started out of the blue? -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated Rotax Repair Center 520-574-1080 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=281507#281507


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:24:07 AM PST US
    From: Bob Comperini <bob@fly-ul.com>
    Subject: Annual
    On 11:03 AM 1/14/2010, Jim Hazen wrote: > >Can someone else with a LSARM certificate do an annual on my plane. Yes, if your plane is certificated as an E-LSA, or S-LSA (and the repairman has the appropriate category/class.. airplane vs weightshift, etc) -- Bob Comperini e-mail: bob@fly-ul.com WWW: http://www.fly-ul.com


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:25:26 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Annual
    From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1@yahoo.com>
    Hi Guys, If you have an ELSA only you, the owner, with the 16 hr course can do your own annual condition inspection. If you or someone else has the 120 hr RLSM-A then you can do yours or anyone else's whether it is ELSA or SLSA. You have to own the plane if you take the 16 hr. course for an ELSA. Someone else with the 16 hr. course can not do your inspection. When you finish the 16 hr. course you have to send paperwork into the FAA and get listed for that plane you own. You can only be listed for these approvals if you own the plane. You could own 4 ELSA planes and so long as you have the 16 hr. course and have them listed with the FAA then you could inspect all 4. If you do not have either course then you can not do your inspection on an ELSA or SLSA and need either an RLSM-A or an A&P. For an SLSA an A&P must have a Rotax class to be legal to work on a Rotax engine if the plane Mfg. says follow the Rotax manual for the inspection which most do. So everyone is on the same page a Light Sport Repairman with a maint. rating should sign it in the log as: RLSM-A (airplane) or RLSM-WS (weight shift) or RLSM-PP (powered parachute) which ever is applicable for your credentials. On an ELSA plane as with a regular experimental anyone can do work other than an inspection. -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated Rotax Repair Center 520-574-1080 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=281517#281517


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:41:58 PM PST US
    From: <ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com>
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    Hi Roger I have a 914 with electric pumps, but if you remove the blanking plate you will find a fuel pump Cam to drive a mechanical pump, ivor ---- Roger Lee <ssadiver1@yahoo.com> wrote: > > There are people that do not have the mechanical pump and have a solid gasket/plate over the opening and only run electric pumps. I saw a 914 like this the other day on a Zenith 701. Way over powered. > > -------- > Roger Lee > Tucson, Az. > Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated > Rotax Repair Center > 520-574-1080 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=281471#281471 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:45:04 PM PST US
    From: "Joe Spencer" <jpspencer@cableone.net>
    Subject: Fuel pump failure
    Thanks guys I have been thru the fuel plumbing twice now and in some areas 3 times. I had hoped to find something definite. The loss of flow begins in the climb from the cockpit floor to the mechanical fuel pump(that is a long uninterrupted run of 1/4 ID tubing that I have taken apart and blown thru 3 times, each time giving it a final check by blowing thru it with my mouth...it is clear, no kinks, no obstructions) and gets increasingly weak from the floor forward. There is no definite choke point but looks to be a gradual and natural loss of flow from I guess distance from the tank, friction of the flow thru the lines and the climb of the lines and resulting loss of head pressure. By the time it gets to the carbs it is really weak, as reported earlier. I realize this sounds theoretically incorrect, and I would be skeptical if I wasn't the one that has seen it and is reporting it. There is full flow at every point prior to that run of tubing where the line starts its climb. As a final check I hooked up a fresh clear line at the point where the loss of flow begins and held it outside the plane at varying heights beginning at floor level and gradually raised it to mechanical pump level...there was a definite loss of flow as the test tube was raised, corresponding to what I saw with the installed line. Come to think of it, all of the gravity flow planes I have ever flown had a bottom mounted carb with no climbs in the lines. I've got plenty of flow at the bottom Joe


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:33:04 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Annual
    From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng@gmail.com>
    Yes, with an LSARM (Light Sport Aircraft Repairman Maintenance) rating the certificate holder can work on any E-LSA or S-LSA aircraft for which he/she is rated. As an example I am rated for airplanes, weight shift control aircraft, and powered parachutes. I can work on any of them (for the SLSA's it also depends on who the manufacturers maintenance manual says can work on their aircraft), but I couldn't work on a gyrocopter or sailplane even if the manufacturer allows an LSARM. Rick Girard On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jim Hazen <jlhazen@copper.net> wrote: > > Can someone else with a LSARM certificate do an annual on my plane. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:51 > To: rotaxengines-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: RotaxEngines-List: Annual > > If you took the 16 hour course (LSARI), no. If you took the 120 hour course > (LSARM), yes. > > Rick Girard > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Jim Hazen <jlhazen@copper.net> wrote: > > > > > Can an LSA Repairman do annual inspections on an SLSA? > > Jim Hazen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [The entire original message is not included] > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:04:54 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1@yahoo.com>
    Hi Joe, Read my last comment, maybe it should be up front. You may want to re-plumb up to the mechanical pump. I use 8 mm (5/16) line up to the pump then it is reduced down. I would use at least 5/16 from every where up to the pump. 1/4 with a long run can be too small. If you look at a Rotax fuel pump the line in port is bigger than the line out port. This is a fairly standard fuel line setup. I know some use 1/4" all the way through, but it isn't supposed to be that way if you read Rotax writings. Larger up to the pump then reduce it down to the carbs. You may want to buy a cheap pressure gauge from 0-10 psi and put this in line before the carbs and check the pressure. That will give you some more info. My other questions are how many hours on the engine and how many hours on the carbs since a rebuild or tear down inspection? You didn't say if this is a new issue after many hours of run time or has been an issue up front? One last thought or maybe it should be one of the first thoughts. Do you have a recirculation line back to your gascolator or tanks. If you happen to get a vapor lock in the right place the pressure will drop to zero. These pumps can't pump air. The start of vapor lock will mimic these symptoms. -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated Rotax Repair Center 520-574-1080 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=281538#281538


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:47:10 PM PST US
    From: "Joe Spencer" <jpspencer@cableone.net>
    Subject: Fuel pump failure
    Hi Joe, >Read my last comment, maybe it should be up front. >You may want to re-plumb up to the mechanical pump. I use 8 mm (5/16) line up to the pump then it is reduced down. I would use at least 5/16 from every where up to the pump. 1/4 with a long run can be too small. If you look at a Rotax fuel pump the line in port is bigger than the line out port. This is a fairly standard fuel line setup. I know some use 1/4" all the way through, but it isn't supposed to be that way if you read Rotax writings. Larger up to the pump then reduce it down to the carbs. Understand. I saw the bigger inlet port today when I was checking things. I am also thinking of a way to route the lines so they don't have to climb from the floor to the pump >You may want to buy a cheap pressure gauge from 0-10 psi and put this in line before the carbs and check the pressure. That will give you some more info. Right. I have that now...it's plumbed in just upstream of the left carb. A direct reading gauge. That's how I got all the pressure readings/fluctuations >My other questions are how many hours on the engine and how many hours on the carbs since a rebuild or tear down inspection? You didn't say if this is a new issue after many hours of run time or has been an issue up front? The engine/carbs have 160 hours since new. No problems at all til the failure last week. Carbs have never been into. >One last thought or maybe it should be one of the first thoughts. Do you have a recirculation line back to your gascolator or tanks. If you happen to get a vapor lock in the right place the pressure will drop to zero. These pumps can't pump air. The start of vapor lock will mimic these symptoms. No return line. On the day of the failure it was about 35 degrees and running avgas. Had been airborne for about an hour. I flew it about an hour today after checking everything. No pressure fluctuations or problems of any kind. Ran fine. I do believe it was the fuel filter now. That is the only thing I found that might have been it. The big thing I think I learned from this is that I don't consider it to be able to gravity feed as it is now. I would encourage others running high wing planes that you think will gravity feed in event of pump failure to check the flow at the carb inlets if you haven't already done so. After checking that I would have grounded mine if I didn't have an electric backup pump. Roger and others...thanks for all the info and I will definitely keep it all in mind as I try to improve the fuel system...I would like to plumb it w/o a low spot in the line routing but that may be difficult w/o interfering with the 701 door opening. Thinking. Thx again Joe


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:54:57 PM PST US
    From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F3hann_J=F3hannsson?= <joeing701@internet.is>
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    Hello Joe. I also have the Zenith 701 and had the vented fuel caps provided with the kit from Zenith. The fuel was limited when the aircraft was airborne due to low pressure created on top of the wing. I had to weld a tube facing forward into the caps to help with the flow, to increase the pressure inside the wing tanks. It has not effected the engine run, because i have the header tank D type installed and the mechanical pumps is sufficient for feeding the engine, but I have an electrical pump to transfer the fuel from the wing tanks to the header tank. Just need to get the flow started with the electrical pump and can turn it off as soon the flow starts. But most often leave it on to speed up the fuel transfer. Just an idea. Best of luck finding the problem. Johann G. Iceland. On 14.1.2010, at 20:44, Joe Spencer wrote: > Thanks guys > I have been thru the fuel plumbing twice now and in some areas 3 > times. I had hoped to find something definite. The loss of flow > begins in the climb from the cockpit floor to the mechanical fuel > pump(that is a long uninterrupted run of 1/4 ID tubing that I have > taken apart and blown thru 3 times, each time giving it a final > check by blowing thru it with my mouth...it is clear, no kinks, no > obstructions) and gets increasingly weak from the floor forward. > There is no definite choke point but looks to be a gradual and > natural loss of flow from I guess distance from the tank, friction > of the flow thru the lines and the climb of the lines and resulting > loss of head pressure. By the time it gets to the carbs it is really > weak, as reported earlier. I realize this sounds theoretically > incorrect, and I would be skeptical if I wasn't the one that has > seen it and is reporting it. There is full flow at every point prior > to that run of tubing where the line starts its climb. As a final > check I hooked up a fresh clear line at the point where the loss of > flow begins and held it outside the plane at varying heights > beginning at floor level and gradually raised it to mechanical pump > level...there was a definite loss of flow as the test tube was > raised, corresponding to what I saw with the installed line. > Come to think of it, all of the gravity flow planes I have ever > flown had a bottom mounted carb with no climbs in the lines. I've > got plenty of flow at the bottom > > Joe > >


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:38:16 PM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com>
    Subject: Fuel pump failure
    > I would like to plumb it w/o a low spot in the line routing but that may be difficult w/o interfering with the 701 door opening Some 701 builders have run the lines forward at the wing root and down along the steel tubes to the firewall. -- Craig _____ From: owner-rotaxengines-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rotaxengines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Joe Spencer Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:41 PM Subject: RotaxEngines-List: Fuel pump failure Hi Joe, >Read my last comment, maybe it should be up front. >You may want to re-plumb up to the mechanical pump. I use 8 mm (5/16) line up to the pump then it is reduced down. I would use at least 5/16 from every where up to the pump. 1/4 with a long run can be too small. If you look at a Rotax fuel pump the line in port is bigger than the line out port. This is a fairly standard fuel line setup. I know some use 1/4" all the way through, but it isn't supposed to be that way if you read Rotax writings. Larger up to the pump then reduce it down to the carbs. Understand. I saw the bigger inlet port today when I was checking things. I am also thinking of a way to route the lines so they don't have to climb from the floor to the pump >You may want to buy a cheap pressure gauge from 0-10 psi and put this in line before the carbs and check the pressure. That will give you some more info. Right. I have that now...it's plumbed in just upstream of the left carb. A direct reading gauge. That's how I got all the pressure readings/fluctuations >My other questions are how many hours on the engine and how many hours on the carbs since a rebuild or tear down inspection? You didn't say if this is a new issue after many hours of run time or has been an issue up front? The engine/carbs have 160 hours since new. No problems at all til the failure last week. Carbs have never been into. >One last thought or maybe it should be one of the first thoughts. Do you have a recirculation line back to your gascolator or tanks. If you happen to get a vapor lock in the right place the pressure will drop to zero. These pumps can't pump air. The start of vapor lock will mimic these symptoms. No return line. On the day of the failure it was about 35 degrees and running avgas. Had been airborne for about an hour. I flew it about an hour today after checking everything. No pressure fluctuations or problems of any kind. Ran fine. I do believe it was the fuel filter now. That is the only thing I found that might have been it. The big thing I think I learned from this is that I don't consider it to be able to gravity feed as it is now. I would encourage others running high wing planes that you think will gravity feed in event of pump failure to check the flow at the carb inlets if you haven't already done so. After checking that I would have grounded mine if I didn't have an electric backup pump. Roger and others...thanks for all the info and I will definitely keep it all in mind as I try to improve the fuel system...I would like to plumb it w/o a low spot in the line routing but that may be difficult w/o interfering with the 701 door opening. Thinking. Thx again Joe


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:53:06 PM PST US
    From: "Joe Spencer" <jpspencer@cableone.net>
    Subject: Fuel pump failure
    Johann Thanks for that...I have the tubes welded on mine too, but no header tank Joe


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:09:09 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    From: Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmail.com>
    Joe said: ..I would like to plumb it w/o a low spot in the line routing but that may be difficult w/o interfering with the 701 door opening. I ask: Don't you WANT a low spot as a water trap??? * * On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Joe Spencer <jpspencer@cableone.net> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > >Read my last comment, maybe it should be up front. > > >You may want to re-plumb up to the mechanical pump. I use 8 mm (5/16) line > up to > the pump then it is reduced down. I would use at least 5/16 from every > where > up to the pump. 1/4 with a long run can be too small. If you look at a > Rotax > fuel pump the line in port is bigger than the line out port. This is a > fairly > standard fuel line setup. I know some use 1/4" all the way through, but it > isn't > supposed to be that way if you read Rotax writings. Larger up to the pump > then > reduce it down to the carbs. > > Understand. I saw the bigger inlet port today when I was checking things. I > am also thinking of a way to route the lines so they don't have to climb > from the floor to the pump > > ** > > >You may want to buy a cheap pressure gauge from 0-10 psi and put this in > line before > the carbs and check the pressure. That will give you some more info. > > *Right. I have that now...it's plumbed in just upstream of the left carb. > A direct reading gauge. That's how I got all the pressure > readings/fluctuations* > > >My other questions are how many hours on the engine and how many hours on > the carbs > since a rebuild or tear down inspection? You didn't say if this is a new > issue after many hours of run time or has been an issue up front? > > *The engine/carbs have 160 hours since new. No problems at all til the > failure last week. Carbs have never been into.* > > > >One last thought or maybe it should be one of the first thoughts. Do you > have a > recirculation line back to your gascolator or tanks. If you happen to get a > vapor > lock in the right place the pressure will drop to zero. These pumps can't > pump air. The start of vapor lock will mimic these symptoms. > > *No return line. On the day of the failure it was about 35 degrees and > running avgas. Had been airborne for about an hour.* > ** > *I flew it about an hour today after checking everything. No pressure > fluctuations or problems of any kind. Ran fine. I do believe it was the fuel > filter now. That is the only thing I found that might have been it. The big > thing I think I learned from this is that I don't consider it to be able to > gravity feed as it is now. I would encourage others running high wing planes > that you think will gravity feed in event of pump failure to check the flow > at the carb inlets if you haven't already done so. After checking that I > would have grounded mine if I didn't have an electric backup pump. * > *Roger and others...thanks for all the info and I will definitely keep it > all in mind as I try to improve the fuel system...I would like to plumb it > w/o a low spot in the line routing but that may be difficult w/o interfering > with the 701 door opening. Thinking.* > *Thx again* > *Joe* > > ** > > > * > > * > >


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:38:43 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel pump failure
    From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1@yahoo.com>
    Glad it is working out. Here are a few things that may help in the future just to make your fuel delivery system a little better. Use the 5/16" line all the way to the mechanical pump. Put in a gascolator for your low spot and you can then take a fuel sample and check for water or other contamination plus it has a screen in it to help filter. Run a recirculation line from the cross over line on top of the carbs back to one of the ports on the gascolator. -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated Rotax Repair Center 520-574-1080 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=281574#281574




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rotaxengines-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RotaxEngines-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rotaxengines-list
  • Browse RotaxEngines-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rotaxengines-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --