Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:00 AM - leaded gas (Jack Kuehn)
     2. 11:12 AM - Re: using lowlead in 912 (Dave Austin)
     3. 08:52 PM - Why exactly shouldn't you run a 914 without a prop? (rparigoris)
 
 
 

Message 1


					INDEX
 Back to Main INDEX
					NEXT
 Skip to NEXT Message
	LIST
 Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
		SENDER
 Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message

      
      
Time: 
07:00:45 AM PST US
Subject: 
leaded gas
From: 
Jack Kuehn <jack.kuehn@gmail.com>
      
      I have used LL in my 912 occasionally, while running full synthetic.  The
      engine will be fine if you just use one tank, and I also used a lead
      scavenger.  I would change the oil sooner, and when you do, remove the oil
      sump and clean it out.  You will see all kinds of gunk in the bottom.  I
      switched to a semi-synthetic so I don't have to worry about the occasional
      dose of LL.  It does gum everything up.  You'll see it on the spark plugs
      too.
      
      Jack
      

Message 2


					INDEX
 Back to Main INDEX
				PREVIOUS
 Skip to PREVIOUS Message
					NEXT
 Skip to NEXT Message
	LIST
 Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
		SENDER
 Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message

      
      
Time: 
11:12:58 AM PST US
From: 
"Dave Austin" <daveaustin2@primus.ca>
Subject: 
Re: using lowlead in 912
      
      
      Ross,
      I have the same situation with fuel as you.  On long trips I'm forced to use 
      LL, but have found that if you change the oil within five hours of refilling 
      with hitest mogas when you get back there is no buildup of sludge at all.
      1993 912U in a 601HDS.  Flown from Toronto to Oshkosh and Sun-n-Fun that 
      way.
      Dave Austin 
      
      

Message 3


					INDEX
 Back to Main INDEX
				PREVIOUS
 Skip to PREVIOUS Message
					NEXT
 Skip to NEXT Message
	LIST
 Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
		SENDER
 Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message

      
      
Time: 
08:52:31 PM PST US
Subject: 
Why exactly shouldn't you run a 914 without a prop?
From: 
"rparigoris" <rparigor@suffolk.lib.ny.us>
      
      
      I have read in the past you shouldn't run a 91X without a prop. Why exactly is
      that?
      Here's a guy running a 914 without a prop, seems at low idle without flywheel effect
      it isn't quite as happy as with a prop, but just a little higher it seems
      pretty happy.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uksKDll6n7M
      Ron Parigoris
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=294046#294046
      
      








Other Matronics Email List Services




Post A New Message
  
rotaxengines-list@matronics.com
UN/SUBSCRIBE
  
http://www.matronics.com/subscription
List FAQ
  
http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RotaxEngines-List.htm
Web Forum Interface To Lists
  
http://forums.matronics.com
Matronics List Wiki
  
http://wiki.matronics.com
7-Day List Browse
  
http://www.matronics.com/browse/rotaxengines-list
Browse RotaxEngines-List Digests
  
http://www.matronics.com/digest/rotaxengines-list
Browse Other Lists
  
http://www.matronics.com/browse
Live Online Chat!
  
http://www.matronics.com/chat
Archive Downloading
  
http://www.matronics.com/archives
Photo Share
  
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
Other Email Lists
  
http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
Contributions
  
http://www.matronics.com/contribution









These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.




-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --