Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:15 AM - Re: 914 fuel consumption (bmoorhouse)
2. 11:05 PM - Re: 914 fuel consumption (rparigoris)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 914 fuel consumption |
rparigoris wrote:
> instead of leaving the TCU on where it is in control of wastegate servo, jog
the wastegate servo till it is fully opened, then turn off the TCU?
> Thx.
> Ron Parigoris
Simple question - why?
The TCU will open the wastegate when it needs to be opened and close it when it
doesn't - I cannot see it will affect fuel flow significantly to jam it open
when MAP is the important factor, not wastegate position.
My 5 cents
--------
_______________
Barry Moorhouse
G-JHYS Trigear XS
Rotax 914 UL
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=295366#295366
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 914 fuel consumption |
Hi Barry
The answer to why, is my curiosity if leaving the wastegate closed, where exhaust
energy is being used to pressurize the intake is more efficient in terms of
fuel flow for a given MP compared to leaving the wastegate opened where there
is no backpressure. I know pressurizing intake will create more power, but when
operating like a normal aspirated 912, in terms of efficency, are you better
off leaving wastegate closed? Opened? or perhaps makes no matter?
Thx.
Ron Parigoris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=295528#295528
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|