Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:27 AM - Re: Rotax 912ULS Question (rampil)
2. 07:30 AM - Re: Old 912s (Paul Folbrecht)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Rotax 912ULS Question |
The rationale or the Rotax method is to be as sure as possible
to remove all air from the pressurized side of the system and
eliminating places where bubble can hang up.
On my Europa, it takes about 5 minutes to pull that hose into a
bucket, or to replace it altogether as I did for my last annual. I
used Aeroquip FC 322-8 with heat shield. Maybe you can re-route your
hose?
If you are building your 12 as "Experimental" instead of ELSA,
please report back with your results.
--------
Ira N224XS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=297714#297714
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
The earliest engines had a 10-year TBO. It was extended to 12 and then 15 on later
models.
As stated, all guidelines.
I wish I could understand the motivation for it. I've been it's a matter of seals
drying but even a tear-down replacing all gaskets & seals is no major OH!
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=297723#297723
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|