Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:23 AM - Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS (Ken Arnold)
2. 08:52 AM - Re: Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS (rampil)
3. 08:58 AM - Re: Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS (Richard Girard)
4. 09:09 AM - Re: Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS (Bob Comperini)
5. 02:33 PM - CATTCO PROPS 3 Vs 2 (FLYaDIVE)
6. 04:03 PM - Re: CATTCO PROPS 3 Vs 2 (Richard Girard)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS |
Hi,
Are you a real group of Rotax owners? I get e-mails that are incomplete
and cannot find the responsible organization. Lockwood does not seem to
think you are valid.
Do you not answer your e-mails? I assume you have no phone to call.
Ken Arnold
do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Arnold
To: info@rotax-owner.com
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS
Hey,
Have you been able to check this out? The document is: SL-912-016
Revision 3.
Many thanks,
Ken Arnold
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Arnold
To: info@rotax-owner.com
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 5:39 PM
Subject: Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS
Hi,
The link in e-mail downloads blank pages. Is there a problem on
your end? The other documents download OK.
Many thanks,
Ken Arnold
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS |
This is a mailing list, not an organization that you have mailed.
If you email questions they may get answered here. That is it,
more or less!
--------
Ira N224XS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=306688#306688
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS |
Ken, The problem is in your email program, not this forum.
Rick Girard
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ken Arnold <arno7452@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hi,
> Are you a real group of Rotax owners? I get e-mails that are incomplete
> and cannot find the responsible organization. Lockwood does not seem to
> think you are valid.
>
> Do you not answer your e-mails? I assume you have no phone to call.
>
> Ken Arnold
>
> do not archive
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Ken Arnold <arno7452@bellsouth.net>
> *To:* info@rotax-owner.com
> *Sent:* Monday, July 26, 2010 1:51 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS
>
> Hey,
> Have you been able to check this out? The document is: SL-912-016
> Revision 3.
> Many thanks,
> Ken Arnold
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Ken Arnold <arno7452@bellsouth.net>
> *To:* info@rotax-owner.com
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 24, 2010 5:39 PM
> *Subject:* Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS
>
> Hi,
> The link in e-mail downloads blank pages. Is there a problem on your end?
> The other documents download OK.
> Many thanks,
> Ken Arnold
>
> *
>
> *
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Applicable fluids for rotax 912ULS |
On 08:58 AM 7/29/2010, Richard Girard wrote:
>Ken, The problem is in your email program, not this forum.
Folks, I also thought he was complaining about this forum, but looking at the emails
he included in his post, I think he's complaining about rotax-owner.com,
and decided to CC the group address
--
Bob Comperini
e-mail: bob@fly-ul.com
WWW: http://www.fly-ul.com
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | CATTCO PROPS 3 Vs 2 |
Hello Gaggle:
I am looking for some information on CATTCO PROPS.
This is their web site:
http://www.cattoprops.com/index.html
Is anyone using their props?
Info needed is:
Three Blade Prop Vs Two Blade Prop.
Is a 54" Pitch CATTCO equivalent to a 62" Pitch Sensinich?
Why is there so much of a difference in pitch call-out between the two?
I say this because a 54" is what was recommended / suggested Vs a 62".
I did some basic calculations and for the same engine and going from a two
blade to a three blade the pitch should be closer to a 60".
I do not want a climb prop - I want a cruse prop.
Does anyone have a spread sheet program or a web site for doing
calculations?
ANY IDEAS?
Thanks Gaggle-
Barry
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CATTCO PROPS 3 Vs 2 |
When it comes to prop carvers they are free to call out there measurements
as they choose. One carver may chose to measure at 75% of diameter, another
may choose 70%, one may choose to use a flat bottom airfoil section and use
the bottom as the reference plane while another might use the true chord of
the airfoil.
People I know who buy carved props generally have a collection and some are
reshaped more than once in the search for that perfect prop.
When I was building a LongEZ I bought a Carver prop that was supposed to be
just the ticket. It had been specially run through Don Bates' Prop Optimizer
program by Bates himself. I sold it to a friend who mounted it on his O-235
powered Varieze. He liked it, it was faster than the prop he was running but
he got itchy for a little more performance and sent it back to Carver. The
company had changed hands and the new guys worked it over pretty good
because when Mike got it back his Varieze was instantly 40 MPH faster. Go
figure.
Craig Catto, Gary Hertzler, and others offer great products, but you may
have to work with them to get exactly what you want. Just put it down to
another aspect of your experiment.
Rick Girard
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:32 PM, FLYaDIVE <flyadive@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Gaggle:
>
> I am looking for some information on CATTCO PROPS.
>
> This is their web site:
>
> http://www.cattoprops.com/index.html
>
> Is anyone using their props?
>
> Info needed is:
> Three Blade Prop Vs Two Blade Prop.
> Is a 54" Pitch CATTCO equivalent to a 62" Pitch Sensinich?
> Why is there so much of a difference in pitch call-out between the two?
> I say this because a 54" is what was recommended / suggested Vs a 62".
> I did some basic calculations and for the same engine and going from a two
> blade to a three blade the pitch should be closer to a 60".
> I do not want a climb prop - I want a cruse prop.
>
> Does anyone have a spread sheet program or a web site for doing
> calculations?
>
>
> ANY IDEAS?
>
> Thanks Gaggle-
>
> Barry
>
> *
>
> *
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|