Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:06 AM - Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada (MacDonald Doug)
2. 04:48 AM - Re: RotaxEngines-List Digest: Flying LSAs into Canada (Thom Riddle)
3. 05:37 AM - Re: Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada (Thilo Kind)
4. 05:37 AM - Re: Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada (Thilo Kind)
5. 06:13 AM - Re: Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada (FLYaDIVE)
6. 06:37 AM - Re: Re: RotaxEngines-Flying LSA into Canada (Noel Loveys)
7. 09:09 AM - 9xx banjo fitting (Kevin Klinefelter)
8. 10:40 AM - 912ULS Oil Pressure Sender (John Fasching)
9. 12:13 PM - Pressure sender bleeding (rparigoris)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada |
Uh, Barry, I think your info is a little out of date about the radio station license.
I've been flying since 2002 and there has never been a requirement for
a station license in that time. What is required is a Restricted Radio Operators
License (Aeronautical). This is a license from Industry Canada to be able
to talk on the aviation band.
> Thank God I never had a ramp check - But you are correct in
> the USA AROW is
> what is required. In Canada ARROW is required. You
> can apply for a Radio
> Station license through the FCC, I think the cost is $8 or
> $20. BUT! Try
>
> Barry
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: RotaxEngines-List Digest: Flying LSAs into Canada |
Doug,
Very useful information on the Cat 3 Canadian Medical. I wonder if the FAA would
accept that as a substitute for an FAA 3rd Class Medical for private pilot privileges.
My guess is that unless the pilot was Canadian citizen, they would
not because it would be seen as an attempt to circumvent the established FAA Medical
requirements.
The reason I'm interested in this is that I do maintenance and inspection on a
US registered Diamond Katana (heavier than LSA limit) that is owned by a Canadian
but hangared here in Buffalo at the same airport I fly from. The owner likes
for me to test fly his airplane after doing maintenance on it but since I
let my FAA medical expire a few years ago, I've not been legally able to do that.
I have no reason to think I would not pass an FAA medical but don't want to
go through the process if I don't actually need it.
Very interesting thread for us who live close to the borders.
Do you happen to know the answers to these?
1) Are US registered aircraft required to have 12" high registration numbers to
fly into Canada?
2) Must US registered aircraft have a 406 MHz ELT to fly into Canada? I fly my
Kolb Slingshot as a single place since I removed the seat belt from the back "seat"
and therefore don't even need any type of ELT.
--------
Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)
Kolb Slingshot SS-021
Jabiru 2200A #1574
Tennessee Prop 64x32
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=319101#319101
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada |
Hi Doug,
you need a FCC radio license to fly operatethe radio / fly outside of the US. This
is a US, not a Canadian requirement. Cost for the license is $110.
Cheers
Thilo
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:03:48 -0800 (PST)
> Von: MacDonald Doug <dougsnash@yahoo.com>
> An: rotaxengines-list@matronics.com
> Betreff: RotaxEngines-List: Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada
> <dougsnash@yahoo.com>
>
> Uh, Barry, I think your info is a little out of date about the radio
> station license. I've been flying since 2002 and there has never been a
> requirement for a station license in that time. What is required is a Restricted
> Radio Operators License (Aeronautical). This is a license from Industry
> Canada to be able to talk on the aviation band.
>
> > Thank God I never had a ramp check - But you are correct in
> > the USA AROW is
> > what is required. In Canada ARROW is required. You
> > can apply for a Radio
> > Station license through the FCC, I think the cost is $8 or
> > $20. BUT! Try
> >
> > Barry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada |
Hi Doug,
you need a FCC radio license to fly operatethe radio / fly outside of the US. This
is a US, not a Canadian requirement. Cost for the license is $110.
Cheers
Thilo
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:03:48 -0800 (PST)
> Von: MacDonald Doug <dougsnash@yahoo.com>
> An: rotaxengines-list@matronics.com
> Betreff: RotaxEngines-List: Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada
> <dougsnash@yahoo.com>
>
> Uh, Barry, I think your info is a little out of date about the radio
> station license. I've been flying since 2002 and there has never been a
> requirement for a station license in that time. What is required is a Restricted
> Radio Operators License (Aeronautical). This is a license from Industry
> Canada to be able to talk on the aviation band.
>
> > Thank God I never had a ramp check - But you are correct in
> > the USA AROW is
> > what is required. In Canada ARROW is required. You
> > can apply for a Radio
> > Station license through the FCC, I think the cost is $8 or
> > $20. BUT! Try
> >
> > Barry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: RotaxEngines-List Flying LSAs into Canada |
Doug:
:-) You are confusing Apples and Apple Sauce.
Please read the post again. In the USA you you have to comply with AROW -
-
I think it was Thom that said AROW first. If
I'm wrong will the author please take a bow. AROW
Airworthiness Registration Owners manual W&B.
To fly outside of the USA you have to ADD the second R - Radio Station
License. Your Plane is the Radio Station - NOT the Operator. I know, I
know it is semantics and even the FCC messes things up there a bit. To
explain Operator Vs Station License... You the Push Button Pusher did NOT
take an FCC test to become a radio operator - The plane is licensed under
the 'N' number as the location of the equipment and even the 'N' says it i
s
from the USA.
You do NOT require ANY Canadian license because the plane is registered in
the USA and You (the pilot) hopefully have a USA Pilot License.
In that way Canada is our Friendly neighbor and just as we can drive in
Canada with a USA drivers license we can Fly and Operate a Radio in Canada.
BUT - If you want to stay there a few days or leave the vicinity of your
plane you have to get a custom's permit. HELL! Even the
Canadian Government wants to make MONEY!
Barry
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:03 AM, MacDonald Doug <dougsnash@yahoo.com> wrote
:
> dougsnash@yahoo.com>
>
> Uh, Barry, I think your info is a little out of date about the radio
> station license. I've been flying since 2002 and there has never been a
> requirement for a station license in that time. What is required is a
> Restricted Radio Operators License (Aeronautical). This is a license fro
m
> Industry Canada to be able to talk on the aviation band.
>
> > Thank God I never had a ramp check - But you are correct in
> > the USA AROW is
> > what is required. In Canada ARROW is required. You
> > can apply for a Radio
> > Station license through the FCC, I think the cost is $8 or
> > $20. BUT! Try
> >
> > Barry
>
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
>
>
--
*Barry*
*=93Chop=92d Liver=94*
* *
*YOU ARE NOT *
*WE ARE*
*BECAUSE WE WERE *
*YOU ARE*
* *
*The words to be inserted are VETERANS=92 and FREE*
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: RotaxEngines-Flying LSA into Canada |
Of course there are the few who fly with no license, no insurance and no
medical. How the ever get away with it eludes me.
Noel
From: owner-rotaxengines-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rotaxengines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Fisher
Sent: November 10, 2010 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: RotaxEngines-List: Re: RotaxEngines-Flying LSA into Canada
It is illegal without a Aviation medical .
There was discussion with Transport Canada but nothing has been done.
If you do have a issue then you might be flying without insurance as well as
you would be without a medical. hence no permit to fly in Canuk airspace.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: FLYaDIVE <mailto:flyadive@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: RotaxEngines-List: Re: RotaxEngines-Flying LSA into Canada
Ken:
Flying into Canadian air space is NOT an issue. I have done it when flying
to OSH.
Even landing at a controlled airport in Canada for gas is not an issue.
No special permits required.
It only becomes an issue if you land at a non-towered airport or you wish to
stay there and leave the immediate vicinity of your plane.
Then you have to have all your paper work in order and SOME Canadian
officials still want you to have a Radio Station License.
Easiest way is to File a Flight Plan.
I was in contact with Canadian ATC and during a lull in operations asked
them all these questions. They were very helpful and not the least bit
concerned.
Barry
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Ken Ryan <keninalaska@gmail.com> wrote:
Noel,
Can you clarify what you mean when you suggest that American LSA pilots
"should just fill out the same class 4 declaration that we do and pay their
$50 registration fee." Sorry, but tI don't understand what you are saying or
how it would be helpful. I'm a private pilot in Alaska and would love to be
able to fly Canadian airspace. But I don't want to get a medical because if
I should happen to fail the medical, I would then not be eligibile to fly
even if I am only exercising Light Sport privileges.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Noel Loveys <noelloveys@yahoo.ca> wrote:
I doubt you will ever see the day when an American aviator will be able to
fly in Canada on the strength of a driver's license. The reason for that is
then TC would then be under pressure to allow the same thing for Canadian
pilots. Considering that medicals for driving are the domain of the
provinces, I can't see that ever happening.
What I think should happen is that American LSA pilots should just fill out
the same class 4 declaration that we do and pay their $50.00 registration
fee... Then enjoy!
Canadian pilots flying south of the 49th are in a bit more of a problem
because they might have to get an American drivers license first and the
regulations governing our AULA are a bit different than LSA. Perhaps the
FAA could inaugurate a same as DL for Canadian pilots heading south... with
an appropriate fee of course.
I would love to be able to fly my Kitfox to Osh sometime but I'm not holding
my breath.
Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rotaxengines-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rotaxengines-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of MacDonald
Doug
Sent: November 8, 2010 8:46 AM
Subject: RotaxEngines-List: Re: RotaxEngines-Flying LSA into Canada
<dougsnash@yahoo.com>
My understanding about opperation of LSAs in Canadian airspace is that you
must have a private pilots license and a catagory three medical. Then you
print off the permission form just like an (Experimental)Amateur Built plane
and carry that with you.
Back when LSAs first came about, the powers that be at Transport Canada said
they were never going to allow pilots to fly without some kind of medical
here in Canada. The last time I heard them speak on the subject they said
something more like, "We're waiting to see how well it works in the US."
That being said, it will likely still be many years before anything happens
with allowing Sport Pilot licenses to fly in Canada with a dirver's license
medical. Tranpost Canada is running pretty lean these days and they have
far bigger fish to fry.
Doug MacDonald
CH-701 C-GBQX
Fort Frances, ON, Canada
Do Not Archive
==========
="_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
ooks.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
et="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
le, List Admin.
==========
-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List
==========
http://forums.matronics.com
==========
_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
ist" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
--
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/chref
"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List">http://www.matronics.
com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | 9xx banjo fitting |
Hi Folks,
I have a 914 in a Europa. The route of the oil line from the bottom of
the engine banjo fitting (push on barb style) to the oil tank goes above
the exhaust. I made a heat shield from some stainless sheet and this
works pretty well, but puts a little pressure on the oil line (teflon
with SS braid)
If the banjo fitting angled down a little I could run the line below,
which would be preferable. Less heat and pressure on the oil line from
contact with the exhaust pipe.
Anyone know of a source for a banjo fitting with an angle that would fit
this application? I don't think I want to go to the AN type banjo
fitting because I can't use AN on the old style oil tank I have. Or is
there an adaptor for that?
Thanks, Kevin
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | 912ULS Oil Pressure Sender |
I installed the VDO oil pressure sender when the Honeywell unit failed
(and screwed up the Dynon D-180 'big time' and flew this morning
(14-degrees F, but Reif heater and a space heater brought oil up to
100-degrees F in an hour) ... the remote sensor gave oil pressure
readings that were rock solid, and the suggestion of dripping oil into
the line from the 912's port over to the firewall-mounted sensor worked
just fine..thanks, Roger.
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Pressure sender bleeding |
There has been a suggestion to bleed the oil pressure sender:
"the suggestion of dripping oil into the line from the 912's port over to the firewall-mounted
sensor worked just fine"
I have a concern that with my UMA differential pressure sender for my 914 that
there will be the same fuel in the line for a long time (differential is fuel
pressure going to the carbs over airbox pressure).
Instead of bleeding the line with Mogas, I could use 100LL which would probably
be a better choice.
I am wondering if there is a better fluid to use for bleeding other than 100LL?
Thx.
Ron Parigoris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=319149#319149
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|