RV-List Digest Archive

Sun 02/02/03


Total Messages Posted: 26



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:10 AM - Re: ENABLE SWITCH (Jerry Springer)
     2. 12:21 AM - Congrats (Arthur and Christine)
     3. 12:46 AM - Re: Panel cutting (Alex Peterson)
     4. 02:38 AM - Re: ENABLE SWITCH (Jim Sears)
     5. 03:36 AM - FAA/TSA rule 14293 (Alex Peterson)
     6. 05:06 AM - Re: Re: Instrument flying in RV's (Wes)
     7. 07:21 AM - Ergonomics - was "Starter Enable" (T Bronson)
     8. 08:17 AM - Re: Columbia Tragedy (Elsa & Henry)
     9. 08:19 AM - Re: ENABLE SWITCH (Meketa)
    10. 08:57 AM - RV-6A tail kit, never opened (Jeff Dowling)
    11. 09:09 AM - Fw: off topic request - 20A DPDT (ON) OFF (ON) switch (C. Rabaut)
    12. 09:37 AM - Fw: Starter enable switch etc. (Curt Reimer)
    13. 10:49 AM - Re: Fw: Starter enable switch etc. (Jerry Springer)
    14. 11:59 AM - KX125 wiring (HCRV6@aol.com)
    15. 01:22 PM - Cycling Voltage Question (Gary Graham)
    16. 02:00 PM - Re: Panel cutting (Mark Fowler)
    17. 03:45 PM - Props for sale (Doug Weiler)
    18. 04:20 PM - Fw: stick grip functions (Jim Lane)
    19. 04:43 PM - Columbia (Rob W M Shipley)
    20. 05:56 PM - Re: RV Builders' Yeller Pages new URL (Vanremog@aol.com)
    21. 06:13 PM - Re: Fw: stick grip functions (Jerry Springer)
    22. 07:11 PM - Re: Props for sale (Wes)
    23. 07:12 PM - >Re: Props for sale (Oldsfolks@aol.com)
    24. 07:44 PM - interior paint woes (Dan Checkoway)
    25. 08:47 PM - Shuttle Disaster (ghaley)
    26. 08:59 PM - Engine Turning - Redux (Terence Gannon)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:10:41 AM PST US
    From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: ENABLE SWITCH
    --> RV-List message posted by: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net> As I said "my opinion" and worth what you paid for it. I still say it is stupid. BTW I am not a builder anymore I have been flying my RV for 14 years. Hopefully you well never get into a tense flying situation where you start griping that stick and pushing all those switches at once. Jerry do not archive Meketa wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Meketa" <acgm@gvtc.com> > > Sounds like a side-by-side builder to me. Most of these starter button > questions are from 8 builders and side-by-siders should take this into > account before commenting.. The 8 is very similar but also very different > than the 6 and 7's. The 4 is different too, most have been religiously kept > light and have simpler systems than the average 8. > > I saw no way to make my plane user friendly and look good without > the switches on the grip. These are not neccessarily big safety items, but > are more conveniant and ergonomic. I guess I am "stupid" for doing > it this way. > > PROS: > > 1. Can start the with a hand on the throttle while holding the > stick back with the other hand. I have acquired the bad habit > of wanting to always hold the stick full aft when starting. I will > have to work on that. > 2. The flaps can be controlled on landing, takeoff and in the pattern > without moving hands from the stick and throttle. The pilots > flap switch can be flipped up and the flaps come up and shut > off after landing and when using flaps for takeoff. Could not be > easier unless the flaps became automatic. Maybe some voice > activated flaps? > 3. The auto pilot and altitude hold can be selected and turned off > without letting go of the stick. Much safer when a hand can be > kept on the stick while selections and disconnects are made. > 4. Can have true dual controls in a tandem and still look good at the > same time. Many do not care, but I wanted the backseater to > have these functions if I want. > 5. Fuel pump can be tuned off, flaps can be run up, trim can be > reset for takeoff. All at the same time, while rolling out on landing, > with hands ready on the stick and throttle. And with just the wiggle > of a couple of fingers. > > CONS: > > 1. Costs more? So what. Worth every penny. > 2. More difficult to use and remember? If you can fly an airplane a well > designed system will not be a problem. A couple of flights will make a > believer out of you. Well, most of you. Some never seem to see it any > way but the same old way. > 3. Difficult to install? I can see how it can intimidate some. I have a 24 > pin connector coming from the pair of grips. A lot of time was spent > thinking about how I wanted it to all work. Do it one system at > a time and it is no more difficult than an RV8 canopy skirt. > 4. Weighs more? Got me there. Install more horsepower. I will take the > Corvette over the MG every time. (I do enjoy the MG's too. Don't > tell anyone. I will not admit to it.) > > Would I do it the same again. YES > > Be sure and DO NOT ARCHIVE. > > George Meketa > RV-8, N444TX, 244.1 hours > > >>I cannot understand how having any of those things on the stick CAN add >>to the safety of the flight IMO it is stupid to have starter buttons, >>landing lights etc. on the stick. I do have elevator trim and push to >>talk on mine but see no godd reason for the others. But then I guess I >>have been flying UN safe for almost 40 years. Remember we are building >>and flying recreational vehicles not 747s. >> >>Just my opinion and worth what you paid for it. $0.00 >> >>Jerry > > > > > > > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:21:54 AM PST US
    From: "Arthur and Christine" <act1@reap.org.nz>
    Subject: Congrats
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Arthur and Christine" <act1@reap.org.nz> Thanks to all for the congrats re the first flight of our RV-8. Our feelings go out to all after the tragic loss of the Columbia Sincerely, Arthur ans Christine RV-8 flying do not archive


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:46:49 AM PST US
    From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@usjet.net>
    Subject: Panel cutting
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@usjet.net> Best would be if you can find a hand nibbler which will cut material the thickness of the panel. No dust from a hacksaw. I'm not at home, so I can't tell if my Adel brand would work. Handy tool. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN RV6-A N66AP 251 hours www.usfamily.net/web/alexpeterson > I know some of you guys have done this, and I need to know > how since I didn't build my RV. I plan to install a new radio > and need to cut out a larger hole. What tool would be the > best (easiest) to use without removing the panel? >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:38:05 AM PST US
    From: "Jim Sears" <sears@searnet.com>
    Subject: Re: ENABLE SWITCH
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Sears" <sears@searnet.com> > Sounds like a side-by-side builder to me. Most of these starter button > questions are from 8 builders and side-by-siders should take this into > account before commenting.. The 8 is very similar but also very different > than the 6 and 7's. The 4 is different too, most have been religiously kept > light and have simpler systems than the average 8. > Since I made my statements about the switches on the grip, and the fact that mine is very simple, I've had that thrown back that I must be a side by side builder. Yes, I do have a side-by-side RV-6A; but, I'm around a lot of RVers and am very familiar with the -8s and -4s. Granted, the -4 is very small inside and has very little panel space. Those guys have to come up with innovative ideas for putting stuff in their panels. However, the -8 is wider, has more panel space, and has nice panels for things in other locations; so, little, if any, of its panel space is lost to nothingness. Instead of doing something quite different for my starter switch, I used a keyed switch that took care of three switches, at least. They were the mags and the starter. Very simple to install and less panel space used. If I'm correct, I also got the benefit of its automatically turning off one mag as I start the engine. Very good if you don't want kickbacks. Having a key is nice, too, if one wants a little added security to keep honest people honest. It probably does nothing for crooks. To me, this arrangement is more of the "standard" that I was implying. I personally don't care for individual switches for mags and starter, either. However, they do work, even though they do take up a little more panel landscape. That's why I'm kinda having a problem with anyone's wanting to put a starter switch on a grip. Even though it may make sense to some of the rest of you guys, it makes no sense to me. To me, it falls out of favor with KISS. That's all. You guys do what you want. I like my simple PTT switch only on the stick. The rest will remain on the panel where I like them. :-) BTW, we talk about "standard" and what it is. Remember that it is speculated that John Denver crashed a Long EZ into the sea and was killed because the fuel selector was in a "non-standard" location. Of course, he did take off with very little gas. We can't rule out his stupidity for not putting some gas in the airplane, to start with. Still, he might have been able to switch tanks before hitting the water had he had the selector where it was designed to be. Granted, the builder of the EZ had no problems with it because he built it for himself; but, he sold it to someone else. Having a starter switch on the stick won't be a big deal like that; but, some other things may. It's like the throttle quadrant in the center I was talking about. It's going to work just fine; but, I'd probably feel uncomfortable about it on a test flight. The owner may not because it takes him back to his old WWII bomber days in B-26s. I was encouraging him to use a more "standard" setup because I know there's a good chance he'll be selling it later. Something to think about. It's a fact that many of us don't keep our RVs for very long. We end up building another! I must confess that I did have to change a couple of switches on my RV. When I set mine up, I had the primer switch up near the throttle because I thought it would be good there at start up time. I put the flap switch down near the fuel selector valve. Guess what. I caught myself using the primer switch for the flap switch quite often. I guess it wasn't "standard" enough. I ended up swapping the locations on the two switches. Now, things are more "standard" to my older brain. I can keep my hand on the throttle and toggle the flap switch with the same hand without leaving the throttle. Much better. Jim Sears in KY RV-6A N198JS EAA Tech Counselor do not archive


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:36:32 AM PST US
    From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@usjet.net>
    Subject: FAA/TSA rule 14293
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@usjet.net> > I just paid a visit to: > > http://dms.dot.gov > While the posts to the "edict" will certainly help, everyone who enjoys flight, and indeed our freedom, should urge his/her congressional members to raise some heat on this one. It takes surprisingly few focused letters to make a difference. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN RV6-A N66AP 251 hours www.usfamily.net/web/alexpeterson


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:06:48 AM PST US
    From: "Wes" <whays@camalott.com>
    Subject: Re: Instrument flying in RV's
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Wes" <whays@camalott.com> Thanks to Camille, Alex, Laird, and Terrence for your response. Quite amazingly you confirmed some of the numbers I have been trying to work on. Now it is practice time, to see what works best for me. I didn't hear from Fred Stucklen, but if anyone has his e-mail address I would like to contact him personally. God Bless America! Wes Hays "The Laws of Aerodynamics are unforgiving and the ground is hard." Michael Collins (1987) > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:21:10 AM PST US
    From: "T Bronson" <bipetype@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Ergonomics - was "Starter Enable"
    --> RV-List message posted by: "T Bronson" <bipetype@hotmail.com> > > >--> RV-List message posted by: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com> > >Tim, ever flown a -4 or -8? Why, yes! I'll have you know that I have OVER 30 MINUTES of actual hands-on, sole manipulator of the controls RV-8 time! Uh...in the...ahem...back seat. Non-formation. >I fly quite a bit of formation and have my radio >stack on the right >http://www.rv-8.com/Pictures/DSCN0025.JPG >and am right handed. The panels on these planes are so small that reaching >across really isn't a big deal. Also, changing hands on the stick is no >problem either. I use both techniques with my radios. Okay, point well taken. My perspective was from a few hundred hours of biplane flying, much of it in formation. I resolved, when dealing with things "in the wrong place," that I would design my airplane to minimize any need to reach across my body or change hands. ...<snip>... >Having owned a Citabria before building my -8 I >already knew what worked for me and how I wanted my panel. No regrets, >it >works fine in real life. That, of course, is the bottom line. >food for thought Yes. I was trying to provide the same with my long-winded post. You based some of your design on your Citabria experience. I'm thinking from a Stearman and Great Lakes perspective. Both of us are approaching this with previous tandem experience, which brings up a good point: for one who plans to build a RV-4 or -8/8A, it might be worthwhile to beg/borrow/steal some time in a tandem airplane to have a look at these issues yourself if you have only flown side by side. Finally, nice panel, Randy! Looks good! Tim


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:17:55 AM PST US
    From: "Elsa & Henry" <elsa-henry@darlor-watch.com>
    Subject: Re: Columbia Tragedy
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Elsa & Henry" <elsa-henry@darlor-watch.com> Thanks to Dan and Patty for expressing my thoughts too. There is an ironic twist to this tragedy. I was the program manager for the electronics subsystem on the Shuttle Remote Manipulator System (Canada Arm) that was designed and built in Montreal.-- Canada has a very close relationship to the USA and NASA and I can assure our American neighbors that the pain of this loss is shared by all of us. I was privileged to be invited by NASA in June 1982 to tour their facilities and witness the launch of STS-4, Columbia's last test flight before the system became fully operational, as it did. Thinking back to that experience of seeing that beautiful bird lifting-off and disappearing into the heavens saddened me terribly to think it is no more. The irony I mentioned above, is the item I worked on (the manipulator arm) survived because it was removed before this fatal flight. My deepest Sympathy and Heart-felt Condolences go out to the Family for the loss of their loved ones.


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:19:33 AM PST US
    From: "Meketa" <acgm@gvtc.com>
    Subject: Re: ENABLE SWITCH
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Meketa" <acgm@gvtc.com> This discussion just will not go away. I am not trying to insult the side- by-siders, it just seems that these comments all come from them. They do not take into consideration the differences between the planes and that we have different needs as far as arranging things. The post started as a question concerning an enable switch that would not keep the starter switch on the grip live. The builder wanted a safe system and had a valid question. It has transformed into a couple of 6 builders telling us that this is the wrong thing to do. I guess I will have to be the only defender of the stick grip starter switch since no others will. Yesterday I saw three RV8's at LaGrange with grip controlled starters and am sure there are many more. This is not a fad. It is becoming more common every day. The 4 is simpler than the 8. Most have manual trim, manual flaps, no auto pilot, and no electronic ignition. Only a fuel pump switch is needed. This is pretty different from many 8's. I had originally got the idea for the Infinity and the starter button from an RV4. This was a very nice, simple and clean plane. He let me sit in it, explained the system and let me know how much he liked it. I saw and felt for myself that the grip was very ergonomic and there were many benefits to this system. It does not just look cool, it works well too. The ones making the comments have not tried one. Concerning keyed ignition switches. I have never liked them and never will. There heve been plenty of problems with switch failures. Also I personally do not like the way they look and work. If electronic ignition is used, one can just as easily leave off one switch or design it so both can be left on and the electronic will be turned off while cranking if need be. A key switch is not needed for this. As far as theft, a key switch is for peace of mind, not to prevent theft. As far as standard goes, installing switches on the grip can be just as standard as a key switch. In a properly designed system everything is accessible by moving a finger. If the finger is not moved there is no chance of activation, even with a death hold on the Infinity grip. The John Denver thing has nothing to do with this. We are not putting things farther from reach, we are putting them closer. What is wrong with a center throttle quadrant on a 6? If the controls are well laid out in the normal order, the quadrant is smooth in function and the necessary switches needed are in logical places and easily accessable, there is no problem. All the twins and even many singles have quadrants in the center . There is nothing non-standard about this. This guy is building an experimental. If he does a nice job it could be better than the "standard" controls. If I had built a 6 it would have had a left side quadrant like Lyle's 6. He even sold it - probably for a lot of money. The weather here is bad for flying or I would not be writing this right now. DO NOT ARCHIVE George Meketa RV-8, N444TX, 241.1 hours > Since I made my statements about the switches on the grip, and the fact that > mine is very simple, I've had that thrown back that I must be a side by side > builder. Yes, I do have a side-by-side RV-6A; but, I'm around a lot of > RVers and am very familiar with the -8s and -4s. Granted, the -4 is very > small inside and has very little panel space. Those guys have to come up > with innovative ideas for putting stuff in their panels. However, the -8 > is wider, has more panel space, and has nice panels for things in other > locations; so, little, if any, of its panel space is lost to nothingness. > > Instead of doing something quite different for my starter switch, I used a > keyed switch that took care of three switches, at least. They were the mags > and the starter. Very simple to install and less panel space used. If I'm > correct, I also got the benefit of its automatically turning off one mag as > I start the engine. Very good if you don't want kickbacks. Having a key is > nice, too, if one wants a little added security to keep honest people > honest. It probably does nothing for crooks. To me, this arrangement is > more of the "standard" that I was implying. I personally don't care for > individual switches for mags and starter, either. However, they do work, > even though they do take up a little more panel landscape. That's why I'm > kinda having a problem with anyone's wanting to put a starter switch on a > grip. Even though it may make sense to some of the rest of you guys, it > makes no sense to me. To me, it falls out of favor with KISS. That's all. > You guys do what you want. I like my simple PTT switch only on the stick. > The rest will remain on the panel where I like them. :-) > > BTW, we talk about "standard" and what it is. Remember that it is > speculated that John Denver crashed a Long EZ into the sea and was killed > because the fuel selector was in a "non-standard" location. Of course, he > did take off with very little gas. We can't rule out his stupidity for not > putting some gas in the airplane, to start with. Still, he might have been > able to switch tanks before hitting the water had he had the selector where > it was designed to be. Granted, the builder of the EZ had no problems with > it because he built it for himself; but, he sold it to someone else. Having > a starter switch on the stick won't be a big deal like that; but, some other > things may. It's like the throttle quadrant in the center I was talking > about. It's going to work just fine; but, I'd probably feel uncomfortable > about it on a test flight. The owner may not because it takes him back to > his old WWII bomber days in B-26s. I was encouraging him to use a more > "standard" setup because I know there's a good chance he'll be selling it > later. Something to think about. It's a fact that many of us don't keep > our RVs for very long. We end up building another! > > I must confess that I did have to change a couple of switches on my RV. > When I set mine up, I had the primer switch up near the throttle because I > thought it would be good there at start up time. I put the flap switch down > near the fuel selector valve. Guess what. I caught myself using the primer > switch for the flap switch quite often. I guess it wasn't "standard" > enough. I ended up swapping the locations on the two switches. Now, things > are more "standard" to my older brain. I can keep my hand on the throttle > and toggle the flap switch with the same hand without leaving the throttle. > Much better. > > Jim Sears in KY > RV-6A N198JS > EAA Tech Counselor > do not archive


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:57:34 AM PST US
    From: "Jeff Dowling" <shempdowling@earthlink.net>
    Subject: RV-6A tail kit, never opened
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Jeff Dowling" <shempdowling@earthlink.net> I have a new, sealed tail kit for a 6a that I no longer need. I wimped out and bought one mostly complete. Any recommendations on where I can sell this? Thanks Jeff Dowling RV-6a Chicago shempdowling@earthlink.net


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:09:40 AM PST US
    From: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut@coalinga.com>
    Subject: off topic request - 20A DPDT (ON) OFF (ON) switch
    --> RV-List message posted by: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut@coalinga.com> Chris, If you don't find one elsewhere, I'm pretty sure I can deliver one. Chuck do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris <chrisw3@cox.net> Subject: RV-List: off topic request > --> RV-List message posted by: Chris <chrisw3@cox.net> > > Sorry for the off topic request but I am out of options. I need a 20A > DPDT (ON) OFF (ON) switch. I have searched digikey.com mouser.com and > mcmaster.com all with no luck. Please help. > > > do not archive > > -- > Chris Woodhouse > 3147 SW 127th St. > Oklahoma City, OK 73170 > 405-691-5206 (home) > chrisw@programmer.net > N35 20.492' > W97 34.342' > > > > > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:37:36 AM PST US
    From: "Curt Reimer" <cgreimer@mts.net>
    Subject: Fw: Starter enable switch etc.
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Curt Reimer" <cgreimer@mts.net> > Does this mean that a pilot would be unable to attempt an airstart without > manipulating mag switches? > > I agree with the other posts about non-standard switches and controls. > There are numerous threads about liability in the archives, this would be a > liability worry issue for me after I sold the aircraft. I have my mag switches set up so that the starter is only enabled if the left impulse-coupled mag is on by itself. Saves the chance of backfiring if someone, including me, tries a start with both mags engaged. Since I am not using a key switch, it also serves as a possible defeat switch for someone messing with my plane. Placarding this would give a thief the starting instructions, but for safety it's probably a good idea. I may do that. From what I have heard, it is pretty hard to get the prop to stop windmilling on a gliding RV, so airstarts generally wouldn't require the use of the starter. Liability may well be an issue, but this is something that would take all of 10 minutes to rewire to a "conventional" arrangement when I sell the airplane. As for someone borrowing the airplane on my authority, they can damn well memorize the starting procedure or they don't fly MY airplane. I'm all for standarized controls, and I agree with most of what the pros have commented on here but this mag switch business is going a bit far. Do I have to have a Cessna key switch and a red plastic split rocker master switch too? That is another area where I have deviated from convention, if convention is defined as a post 1970 spam can. I'm a bit unnerved at just how many variations from standard there are in the average homebuilt. But by and large these are single-pilot airplanes, and I think most RV pilots could operate any electrical item, including the starter, blindfolded if they had to. Now if an unconventional arrangement is obviously dangerous in some way, like John Denver's fuel selector location, then no, we shouldn't do it. Starter switch on the stick - hmmm maybe. But being unconventional doesn't automatically mean dangerous. Sometimes unconventional might be an improvement. That's how we got as far as we did. There was a time when the "conventional control arrangement" involved lying on one's belly in a hip cradle that warped the wings. (I finally got to use the "Wright Brothers Defence" on the RV list! :-) Curt


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:49:46 AM PST US
    From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Fw: Starter enable switch etc.
    --> RV-List message posted by: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net> Curt Reimer wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "Curt Reimer" <cgreimer@mts.net> > > > Does this mean that a pilot would be unable to attempt an airstart > without > > manipulating mag switches? > > > > I agree with the other posts about non-standard switches and controls. > > There are numerous threads about liability in the archives, this would be > a > > liability worry issue for me after I sold the aircraft. > > I have my mag switches set up so that the starter is only enabled if the > left impulse-coupled mag is on by itself. Saves the chance of backfiring if > someone, including me, tries a start with both mags engaged. Since I am not > using a key switch, it also serves as a possible defeat switch for someone > messing with my plane. Placarding this would give a thief the starting > instructions, but for safety it's probably a good idea. I may do that. > > From what I have heard, it is pretty hard to get the prop to stop > windmilling on a gliding RV, so airstarts generally wouldn't require the use > of the starter. > Curt depends on which prop you use. Constant speed maybe it well keep windmilling but if a wood prop is being used it is almost impossible to keep it spinning. When I was using wood props I stopped the prop spinning several time with different wood props and each time had to use the starter to get it spinning again. I suppose it would have started spinning if I had done a high speed dive and then pulled the nose up but this only works if there is enough altitude. Jerry


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:59:02 AM PST US
    From: HCRV6@aol.com
    Subject: KX125 wiring
    --> RV-List message posted by: HCRV6@aol.com Hi Cliff, tried to post this to you direct but got bum address message so here goes: I have a KX125 from Van's (who by the way is not prewiring the harness any longer) and have been trying to figure out how to wire the bloody thing for a month with little success so far. I called King directly and got virtually no help at all, except that they did seem to know that the AUX AUDIO 1, 2, 3 that you asked about are internal intercom functions, but the guy I was talking to could not explain how to connect them. I have a separate intercom in my panel so have decided to ignore those. If you find anyone who knows how to wire one of these units I'd sure appreciate a chance to get some advice from them. Do not archive Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, starting firewall forward


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:22:23 PM PST US
    Subject: Cycling Voltage Question
    From: Gary Graham <beeb@teleport.com>
    --> RV-List message posted by: Gary Graham <beeb@teleport.com> I have seen this problem with the 35 amp systems from Van's. Many problems eventually manifest themselves due to lack of a 35 Amp return to the alternator(GROUND) The anodized brackets do not make for good grounds, as it is an insulator. Your ohm meter may show a ground from shields , small ground wires, and scratches in the anodizing, but this is not enough. Not only is the output limited, but over the long haul it is likely that the stress on the system will cause some partial or complete failures. Make sure you have a ground return path that will handle the rated output of the alternator. This is just one of the problems that I have seen on RV electric's, but it's worth your consideration. GG


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:00:50 PM PST US
    From: "Mark Fowler" <mark@fowlerssheetmetal.com>
    Subject: Re: Panel cutting
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Mark Fowler" <mark@fowlerssheetmetal.com> Paul, I know you don't want to hear this but since you don't want to remove the panel there is no easy, clean way to cut the hole. If you can supply the CAD drawing I'd be glad to Laser cut you a new panel for just the cost of the material. Mark www.fowlerssheetmetal.com Mark Fowler mark@fowlerssheetmetal.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@usjet.net> Subject: RE: RV-List: Panel cutting > --> RV-List message posted by: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@usjet.net> > > Best would be if you can find a hand nibbler which will cut material the > thickness of the panel. No dust from a hacksaw. I'm not at home, so I > can't tell if my Adel brand would work. Handy tool. > > Alex Peterson > Maple Grove, MN > RV6-A N66AP 251 hours > www.usfamily.net/web/alexpeterson > > > > I know some of you guys have done this, and I need to know > > how since I didn't build my RV. I plan to install a new radio > > and need to cut out a larger hole. What tool would be the > > best (easiest) to use without removing the panel? > > > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:45:36 PM PST US
    From: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil@pressenter.com>
    Subject: Props for sale
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil@pressenter.com> Fellow Listers: One of our members has the following for sale: Aymer-Demuth wood prop for 180 hp Lycoming - airworthy - removed to install metal prop. Irlbeck Pacesetter prop - great for the fireplace - the price is right Contact Tom Berge at: tberge@libertysite.com, 763-541-9306 Thanks Doug Weiler MN Wing do not archive


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:20:59 PM PST US
    From: "Jim Lane" <jlane@crosscountybank.com>
    Subject: Fw: stick grip functions
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Lane" <jlane@crosscountybank.com> Free Web Email & Filter Enhancements. http://www.freewebemail.com/filtertools/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Lane Subject: stick grip functions Jerry, I certainly did not mean to imply that flying without certain grip functions makes anyone unsafe. However, I must disagree that having other functions is stupid! I also fly some airplanes that have nothing other than a PTT button on the stick, and some that do not even have a PTT on the stick! I do not feel that makes my flying unsafe, nor do I think that adding other switches makes one unsafe. It makes me wonder why you think anything other than a PTT and elevator control is stupid. Using that kind of logic, how do you justify the trim or even the PTT functions? Just wondering. I really would like to hear why you think is stupid. Perhaps I need to be enlightened. Jim


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:43:05 PM PST US
    From: "Rob W M Shipley" <Rob@RobsGlass.com>
    Subject: Columbia
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Rob W M Shipley" <Rob@RobsGlass.com> Although deeply saddened I sent no post to the list about this topic for lack of anything I felt expressed my thoughts and feelings adequately. Ken Brooks said it perfectly for me. Watching the television coverage of the loss of the shuttle and crew, I was struck by the close-up video footage by those who taped the event. Knowing full well how tragic it was, I was still struck by the "beauty" of what I was watching -- like a shooting star or a bright comet, things that have always held my fascination and awe. It's that same wonder and awe that made me want to fly airplanes -- the spectacular views, the sensations of flight, the views of the clouds from above -- the list goes on and on. It is indeed an unforgiving environment we pilots work and play in. My prayers go out to the astronauts and their families. They are my heroes. They've slipped the surly bonds of earth and now may they truly be touching the face of God. Thank you Ken. God bless them all. Rob Rob W M Shipley RV9A N919RV Fuselage. Do not archive


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:56:03 PM PST US
    From: Vanremog@aol.com
    Subject: Re: RV Builders' Yeller Pages new URL
    --> RV-List message posted by: Vanremog@aol.com Thanks to all of you who have graciously offered to host the Yeller Pages, giving a well deserved respite to the relocating Mike Hartmann. Matt Dralle is now the proud recipient of the torch, because is the main man in virtually all other RV respects, so I trust they will be in good hands. I will continue to update them twice yearly until someone more studly rises from the ranks to carry them forward. Those of you having the Yeller Pages listed in your Bookmarks or Favorite Places menus should redirect them to <http://www.matronics.com/YellerPages>. Thank you all for your kind words of support. -GV (RV-6A N1GV 590hrs)


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:13:35 PM PST US
    From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Fw: stick grip functions
    --> RV-List message posted by: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net> > From: Jim Lane > To: jsflyrv@earthlink.net > Subject: stick grip functions > > > Jerry, > > I certainly did not mean to imply that flying without certain grip functions makes anyone unsafe. > > However, I must disagree that having other functions is stupid! > Then I would suggest you build to suit your needs and not give a thought to what I or anyone else thinks. As I have said it is my opinion and worth what you pay. Running all of those wires to the stick grip only creates more potential failure points IMO. Even in my "side by side" I can reach any point on the panal that requires any attention without having the stick cluttered with system switches. Any way build what makes you happy. Jerry


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:11:13 PM PST US
    From: "Wes" <whays@camalott.com>
    Subject: Re: Props for sale
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Wes" <whays@camalott.com> Listers, I have a friend who is an A&P and overhauls and assembles engines. He is in need of an old prop to use as a club for test runs. If anyone out there has one they would like to part with, please e-mail me off-list at whays@camalott.com Thanks, Wes Hays Winters TX


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:12:54 PM PST US
    From: Oldsfolks@aol.com
    Subject: Re: >Re: Props for sale
    --> RV-List message posted by: Oldsfolks@aol.com What's wrong with a guy who won't quote his price when he has something for sale?????????? If you want to sell it ; put all the info up !!!!!!!!!! Bob Olds A&P , EAA Tech. Counselor RV-4 , N1191X , Flying Now Charleston, Arkansas "Real Aviators Fly Taildraggers"


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:44:10 PM PST US
    From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com>
    Subject: interior paint woes
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com> I've scoured the archives in search of tips and information, but I'm still coming up short. After screwing around with Cardinal air-dry acrylic enamel spray cans, and being very unhappy with its durability and its tendency to splatter dark drops on the piece, I switched to Sherwin Williams single-stage Dimension 3.5 urethane enamel. I'm using the reducer and hardener that my local auto paint shop sold me, and I'm mixing it 5:1:1 as the instructions say to do. I'm having a couple of problems: 1) Dust, dust, and more dust. I'm painting the parts on table tops on top of masking paper, so maybe that's the problem right there...but I've got plastic up all around my garage and I tried wetting the floor down and everything, yet I still get dust particles in there like crazy. Is there any way to fix/buff/sand that out after the fact? I've got 1000 and 2000 grit wet/dry sand paper, but even the 2000 grit takes the gloss right off. What to do? Do most people hang parts to paint them? How do you stabilize small lightweight parts? I've seen people hang wires beneath the part to grab, but I don't think that will stabilize this stuff well enough (little cover panels, etc.). 2) Color bleed. Bleed is probably the wrong term. I'm using a light gray, and in several spots on almost all of the pieces, the color comes out lighter in splotches. It doesn't seem to have anything to do with how much paint I'm putting on, because even on subsequent coats (20-30 minutes later) the lighter splotches bleed right through. The gloss is totally consistent, it's just the color that's off in these spots. It's totally unpredictable in that light splotches pop up in random spots. Could this have something to do with temperature or moisture or the wrong reducer? I have an inline moisture filter at the regulator and another one at the gun (and yes, it's a clean, non-oiled hose). Could this have anything to do with the type of gloves I'm wearing and handling the parts with? The spots don't seem to coincide with handling, but I'm not ruling that out. For what it's worth, I'm spraying with a touch-up sprayer from Harbor Freight. Please don't tell me to spend lots of money on an HVLP sprayer...I know there are people out there who have successfully painted their interiors with cheap touch-up guns... I'm generally happy with the gloss and finish (other than the dust), it's just the color thing that's plaguing me right now. I'm very happy with the durability and finish that this Dimension paint seems to have...it's just these little pesky problems that are dragging me down right now. Any advice is much appreciated! )_( Dan RV-7 N714D (fuselage/finish) http://www.rvproject.com


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:47:30 PM PST US
    From: "ghaley" <ghaley@wt.net>
    Subject: Shuttle Disaster
    --> RV-List message posted by: "ghaley" <ghaley@wt.net> I just cannot help expressing my heart felt sympathy for those lost in the service of our country, especially the families of the seven Astronauts. I must admit I was very hurt when I viewed the disaster on TV, but what about our soldiers lost in Afganistan and other areas of the world? Their loss was just as tragic to their faimlies and no flags were lowered. Sorry I just had to express my feelings here. Do not archive. Gary, Houston. TX


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:59:14 PM PST US
    From: "Terence Gannon" <terence.gannon@telus.net>
    Subject: Engine Turning - Redux
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Terence Gannon" <terence.gannon@telus.net> Regular readers of the RV-List will still be laughing about my post a couple of weeks back about 'scallop polishing'. Listers being the tactful bunch they are, I was politely informed that the technique is called engine turning and was given a ton of great advice -- thanx to all that responded. I've investigated doing this myself, and while entirely feasible with a little time and effort, I figured that to get the precise effect I was looking for, I would actually have to do the polishing PRIOR to the folding of the flanges and the bending of the firewall recess. I was in the midst of composing my note to Van's about shipping me the unfolded blanks when my wife (who is MUCH smarter than me) said "why don't you have someone down there do it?" Geez, I wish I had thought of that! Which gets me to my question -- could any lister in the Portland area recommended an outfit that could do the engine turning on the blanks of the firewall and recess. I imagine that it would be an outfit that would do it for the drag racing/hot rod community. Ideally, it would be an outfit that wouldn't mind picking up and dropping off at Van's. Assuming this all comes together, I would be happy to post the results, and perhaps there are other Rvers that would be interesting in the same treatment. Thank you, in advance, for your assistance. Cheers. Terry in Calgary RV-6 S/N 24414 "Wings"




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv-list
  • Browse RV-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --