Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:05 AM - Re: Oil on Belly (James E. Clark)
2. 12:49 AM - Re: New EFIS option (Jeff Point)
3. 12:56 AM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (George McNutt)
4. 05:22 AM - Re: Air Box Advisory (Wayne R. Couture)
5. 05:38 AM - Canopy Cover (Jim Norman)
6. 05:45 AM - DC Headset Retrofit (Roger Embree)
7. 05:48 AM - Re: Canopy Cover (Ken Balch)
8. 06:10 AM - Re: DC Headset Retrofit (Bob Hassel)
9. 06:10 AM - Brakes Sticking?? (Dan DeNeal)
10. 06:10 AM - Re: DC Headset Retrofit (RV8ter@aol.com)
11. 06:16 AM - Re: Prop testing data posted (John Brick)
12. 06:32 AM - Re: Brakes Sticking?? (Bill Marvel)
13. 06:32 AM - Re: Canopy Cover (Vanremog@aol.com)
14. 06:34 AM - Re: Canopy Cover (Bill Marvel)
15. 06:40 AM - Re: Canopy Cover (Bill VonDane)
16. 06:46 AM - Re: Air Box Advisory (Bill Marvel)
17. 07:28 AM - Re: large OD, thin wall tubing? (lm4@juno.com)
18. 07:55 AM - Re: DC Headset Retrofit (Dwight Frye)
19. 08:29 AM - Re: Oil on Belly (Lenleg@aol.com)
20. 08:32 AM - Re: Canopy Cover (Lenleg@aol.com)
21. 09:45 AM - Re: large OD, thin wall tubing? (HCRV6@aol.com)
22. 09:56 AM - AOA audio out to UPS/Apollo GX-65 intercom (Nightingale Michael)
23. 09:58 AM - Re: DC Headset Retrofit (Randy Lervold)
24. 10:00 AM - Re: Prop testing data posted (Randy Lervold)
25. 10:33 AM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (Jerry Springer)
26. 10:39 AM - Re: Oil on Belly (Jerry Springer)
27. 10:57 AM - Re: Oil on Belly (Kyle Boatright)
28. 11:14 AM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (Bill Marvel)
29. 11:21 AM - Re: Brakes Sticking?? (C. Rabaut)
30. 11:43 AM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (Jerry Springer)
31. 11:58 AM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (Bill Marvel)
32. 12:00 PM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (Hal Rozema)
33. 12:09 PM - Re: Brakes Sticking?? (Alex Peterson)
34. 12:11 PM - [ Karie Daniel ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! (Email List Photo Shares)
35. 12:20 PM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (JRWillJR@aol.com)
36. 12:23 PM - [ David Aronson ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! (Email List Photo Shares)
37. 01:04 PM - Re: Prop testing data posted (Kevin Horton)
38. 01:23 PM - Re: AOA audio out to UPS/Apollo GX-65 intercom (Jim Norman)
39. 03:25 PM - Re: Air Box Advisory (Gary)
40. 03:32 PM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (Jim Sears)
41. 04:27 PM - Re:Oil on Belly (RGray67968@aol.com)
42. 04:48 PM - Re: RV-List Digest: 30 Msgs - 02/21/03 (PSPRV6A@aol.com)
43. 06:16 PM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (Bill Marvel)
44. 06:17 PM - Re: Brakes Sticking?? (Gary Zilik)
45. 06:21 PM - >Re: Dragging Brakes (Oldsfolks@aol.com)
46. 06:26 PM - > Re: UV Smoothprime- What is Crosslink (Oldsfolks@aol.com)
47. 07:11 PM - Re: Serious Oil dump on the bottom of plane (Dave Bristol)
48. 07:29 PM - Fw: Van's Aircraft RV Survey (Daniel A. Storer)
49. 08:46 PM - Hangar Fire (Tom Gummo)
50. 09:54 PM - Re: Prop testing data posted (LeastDrag93066@aol.com)
51. 10:32 PM - Sensenich Prop (was Prop testing data posted) (Stein Bruch)
52. 10:37 PM - Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat (JRWillJR@aol.com)
Message 1
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "James E. Clark" <jclark@conterra.com>
Len,
How much oil are you starting with???
Many of these Lycomings will "blow out" the 8th (or even 7th) quart of oil.
I have found that once they get around 6.5 quarts, the bottom seems to
remain clean and the perceived oil "consumption" seems to stabilize.
Your mileage may vary.
James
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Lenleg@aol.com
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 6:58 PM
> To: rv-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV-List: Oil on Belly
>
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: Lenleg@aol.com
>
> Kyle & List:
>
> In the article posted earlier on your oil loss that Lycoming said your
> breather was beveled the wrong way - creating a vacumn. What is
> the correct
> way?
>
> I am getting more oil on the belly than I feel is normal ... yet
> there are no
> leaks in the engine compartment and the dip stick is tight. I think this
> could possibly be my problem.
>
> Thanks !!
>
> Len Leggette, RV-8A
> Greensboro, NC N910LL
> 56 hours
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: New EFIS option |
--> RV-List message posted by: Jeff Point <jpoint@mindspring.com>
I'll trade with you if you like. ;)
Jeff Point
RV-6 finish kit
Milwaukee WI
Do not archive.
>Wish I was still building :-(
>
>Regards,
>
>Chris Good,
>West Bend, WI
>RV-6A N86CG, 500 hrs flying.
>
>
>
>
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: "George McNutt" <gmcnutt@intergate.ca>
--> RV-List message posted by: -------
--------------big snip ---------------------
It just irritates the hell out of me when I hear people say well I might
be in a situation where I can't help flying into some kind of adverse
weather, that is total BS, anyone with their eyeballs open can see what
kind of weather they are flying in and take preventative action.
Anyone that flies into know weather conditions beyond their experience
or the ability of their aircraft should maybe take up basket weaving.
I guess with this one I better get out the old flame suit.
-----------------------------
(1) Eyeballs!
Yes - since you suggested it here is your flame, and possibly a new
discussion.
- It would not be good PR for flight schools or the aviation industry to
advertise the fact that the human visual system is one of the weakest
components of our VFR flight system. There are many situations where you, or
myself, could fly into the ground, water, cloud or another aircraft without
being able to detect same with our mark one eyeballs!!
If you disagree try flying across Greenland without your altimeter.
The next time you line up on the runway remember that your depth perception
system reaches all the way out to the first runway light, your judgment of
how far away distant objects are is based on experience not your eyeballs,
judging your distance from some cloud is impossible.
Unfortunately life is to short to experience all the lighting, weather, and
optical illusions that one can encounter in flying, however experience and
training can prevent many of the risks associated with our inadequate
(20/20) mark one eyeballs.
(2) Carb Heat
- the FAR's say that at 30 degrees F. your carb heat must produce a 90
degree F rise at 75% power, I have never had a certified light aircraft
(with CAT gauge) that could produce that much heat.
I would be interested in hearing from others how much temperature rise their
RV's (with CAT) are getting when carb heat is selected on.
In flight my carb temp shows about 10 deg F cooler than the OAT gauge and I
get about a 15 degree F rise in CAT in flight when the carb heat is selected
on. On run up on my 6A (0-320) I have a 30 RPM drop when carb heat is
selected on. I have a custom heat muff about 8" long on one crossover pipe
and plan a new larger carb heat muff surrounding both crossover pipes.
In flight I am getting higher carb temperature readings with carb heat at
low power settings (approach) than I do at cruise power.
(3) And the answer as to when carb heat could raise the temperature to the
point where carb ice could occur, - when flying in ice crystals.
George McNutt
Langley, B.C.
6A - 117 hrs
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Box Advisory |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Wayne R. Couture" <commando@cox-internet.com>
> I was trying to explain to a friend of mine with an 8 about this post
because he is doing firewall forward now. His FAB has a mesh filter before
the carb heat inlet and a carb filter just under the carb after the carb
heat inlet. Is this the same setup as we are discussing here? Wouldn't the
pre filter stop the snow from invading the carb filter?
Confussed
Wayne
RV-8A
>
>
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Norman" <jgnorman@tampabay.rr.com>
I need to buy a canopy cover... the kind that is made of cloth and goes over
the canopy when you leave the plane outside overnight.
Which ones do you all recommend?
jim
tampa
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | DC Headset Retrofit |
--> RV-List message posted by: Roger Embree <rembree@sympatico.ca>
Can someone please point me to the guy in Michigan who does the mods to
the David Clark headsets. Someone has a link on their website but I
forgot to bookmark it.
Also, perhaps a thread could be started on taking pictures from inside
the fishbowl. I have tried taking shots from inside my RV4 but I always
get reflections. I talked to my brother about it (RV3) and he said "All
I got were pictures of my instrument panel" . Does someone have tips or
do's and don'ts.
TIA
Roger Embree
RV4 CGIRH
Collingwood Ont
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Canopy Cover |
--> RV-List message posted by: Ken Balch <kbalch1@attbi.com>
Hi Jim,
I bought a Bruce's Custom Cover last year at SnF and have been very
happy with it. It's well-made and fits great.
Regards,
Ken Balch
RV-8 N118KB
Jim Norman wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Norman" <jgnorman@tampabay.rr.com>
>
>I need to buy a canopy cover... the kind that is made of cloth and goes over the
canopy when you leave the plane outside overnight.
>
>Which ones do you all recommend?
>
>jim
>tampa
>
>
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | DC Headset Retrofit |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Bob Hassel" <bob@hassel-usa.com>
Have you tried a polarizing filter on your camera lens?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Roger Embree
Subject: RV-List: DC Headset Retrofit
--> RV-List message posted by: Roger Embree <rembree@sympatico.ca>
Can someone please point me to the guy in Michigan who does the mods to
the David Clark headsets. Someone has a link on their website but I
forgot to bookmark it.
Also, perhaps a thread could be started on taking pictures from inside
the fishbowl. I have tried taking shots from inside my RV4 but I always
get reflections. I talked to my brother about it (RV3) and he said "All
I got were pictures of my instrument panel" . Does someone have tips or
do's and don'ts.
TIA
Roger Embree
RV4 CGIRH
Collingwood Ont
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Brakes Sticking?? |
--> RV-List message posted by: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot@yahoo.com>
I have been doing a lot of taxing around the airport
the last several days. And each time I come back to
the hangar, I can't push or pull the airplane by
myself into the hangar. It seems the brakes are
sticking. How do I correct this problem?
Dan DeNeal
rv6a - N256GD
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: DC Headset Retrofit |
--> RV-List message posted by: RV8ter@aol.com
I've taken some still photos and movies shots (mpgs) recently from the back
of an RV 8 and most if not all the "outside the cockpit" shots came out fine
during the daytime but not very well at night. I used an Olympus D510
digital camera. I didn't use any special settings but you might try
ensuring your camera is as perpendicular to the canopy as possible, as close
to the canopy as possible and maybe even preset your focus to infinity.
do not archive
lucky
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Prop testing data posted |
--> RV-List message posted by: "John Brick" <jbrick@wolfenet.com>
Randy,
Thanks for the report. With the information available at present, I will opt
for the Whirl Wind 150. Weight reduction is the main inducement.
In your report, above the TOP SPEED table, you say "lower OAT will yield
higher power" . How do you account for the 10 degree OAT difference in the
cruise table?
jb
RV-4
Firewall forward
--> RV-List message posted by: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Many of you are aware that I have been in search of a prop upgrade for my
RV-8. I have now completed testing on the Whirl Wind 150 and have data
compiled as to how it compares with the Hartzell HC-C2YK-1BF. The updated
info on this process can be found at...
www.rv-8.com/Prop.htm
This is only the first half of the process, as you will read on the above
page I will be testing a 2-blade prop from Whirl Wind whithin a couple of
weeks.
Hope you find it informative and/or useful.
Randy Lervold
RV-8, 295 hrs
EAA Technical Counselor
Home Wing VAF
www.rv-8.com
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Brakes Sticking?? |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Marvel <bmarvel@cox.net>
Dan:
First guess is that brake master cylinder return springs are not fully
pushing the plunger all the way back up. Try this when you encounter the
problem again. Reach down and grab the brake pedals and pull them all the
way aft. If you feel them move and if this solves the problem, you have
isolated it to the return springs. See what happens and advise.
Bill Marvel
Dan DeNeal wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot@yahoo.com>
>
> I have been doing a lot of taxing around the airport
> the last several days. And each time I come back to
> the hangar, I can't push or pull the airplane by
> myself into the hangar. It seems the brakes are
> sticking. How do I correct this problem?
>
> Dan DeNeal
> rv6a - N256GD
>
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/
>
--
Bill Marvel Home/office 310 832 7617
P.O. Box 784 Cell 310 293 2013
San Pedro, CA 90733 Fax 310 832 5334
One good deed beats 100 good intentions...
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Canopy Cover |
--> RV-List message posted by: Vanremog@aol.com
In a message dated 2/22/2003 5:39:32 AM Pacific Standard Time,
jgnorman@tampabay.rr.com writes:
> I need to buy a canopy cover... the kind that is made of cloth and goes over
> the canopy when you leave the plane outside overnight.
>
> Which ones do you all recommend?
DJ Lauritsen is absolutely the best IMO.
-GV (RV-6A N1GV 593hrs)
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Canopy Cover |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Marvel <bmarvel@cox.net>
Jim Norman wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Norman" <jgnorman@tampabay.rr.com>
>
> I need to buy a canopy cover... the kind that is made of cloth and goes over
> the canopy when you leave the plane outside overnight.
>
> Which ones do you all recommend?
>
I just bought the one from Van for my -8A and it works fine. However, I intend
to modify the skirt portion, which is a little on the loose side. May sew in
some darts and/or add a small bungee cord.
Bill Marvel
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Canopy Cover |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
I bought mine from Becki Orndorf... Fits like a glove and very light!
-Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Norman" <jgnorman@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: RV-List: Canopy Cover
--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Norman" <jgnorman@tampabay.rr.com>
I need to buy a canopy cover... the kind that is made of cloth and goes over
the canopy when you leave the plane outside overnight.
Which ones do you all recommend?
jim
tampa
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Box Advisory |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Marvel <bmarvel@cox.net>
Wayne:
I am having a little trouble picturing this setup. I think you are saying that
this FAB has one mesh screen at the point where the scat tube from the carb heat
muff enters the FAB and a second one on the base of the carburetor. If this is
the setup, I'm puzzled at the existence of the screens. In the current design,
all flow to the engine has to pass through the air filter anyway, so what are the
screens supposed to accomplish? Maybe I just did not get a correct mental
picture of this air box.
Bill Marvel
"Wayne R. Couture" wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Wayne R. Couture" <commando@cox-internet.com>
>
> > I was trying to explain to a friend of mine with an 8 about this post
> because he is doing firewall forward now. His FAB has a mesh filter before
> the carb heat inlet and a carb filter just under the carb after the carb
> heat inlet. Is this the same setup as we are discussing here? Wouldn't the
> pre filter stop the snow from invading the carb filter?
>
> Confussed
>
> Wayne
> RV-8A
> >
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: large OD, thin wall tubing? |
--> RV-List message posted by: lm4@juno.com
Chris,
You might try an electrical supply house. Ask for three inch
aluminum conduit. It shuold be three inch ID and about 3 1/4" OD.
Larry Mac Donald
Rochester N.Y.
do not archive
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:24:20 -0600 Chris <chrisw3@cox.net> writes:
> --> RV-List message posted by: Chris <chrisw3@cox.net>
>
> Does anyone know where I can get a few feet of aluminum tubing in
> the
> range of 3.5" to 4" OD with a wall of around .030" to .065", thicker
> would be "acceptable" as long as it wasn't more than .125. What
> ever
> the wall, I need the ID to be 3.25" or larger. I need 2 pieces of
> 24"
> to 30" each, depending on the diameter. (Small diameter, long
> length;
> large diameter, short length.) The Yard has some 4" stuff but they
> have
> a $100 minimum and the only other aluminum I need is just a small
> sheet
> to use to cap one end of each tube. BTW I could use copper, brass,
> bronze, or stainless steel too, but I figure they would all be a lot
> more expensive than aluminum. Just in case you were wondering it is
> for
> a wave guide antenna for wireless networking over long distances.
>
>
> do not archive
>
> --
> Chris Woodhouse
> 3147 SW 127th St.
> Oklahoma City, OK 73170
> 405-691-5206 (home)
> chrisw@programmer.net
> N35 20.492'
> W97 34.342'
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: DC Headset Retrofit |
--> RV-List message posted by: Dwight Frye <dwight@openweave.org>
On Sat Feb 22 08:43:56 2003, Roger Embree wrote :
>Can someone please point me to the guy in Michigan who does the mods to
>the David Clark headsets. Someone has a link on their website but I
>forgot to bookmark it.
I don't know about a guy in Michigan, but are you maybe thinking about
the Headsets Inc people? They are in Amarillo, TX and have a mod for
Dave Clarks which turn them into ANR headsets. If this is what you have
in mind .. more info can be found at http://www.headsetsinc.com/.
If this is NOT what you have in mind, then what does the guy in Michigan
do with DC headsets?? Just curious.
-- Dwight
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Oil on Belly |
--> RV-List message posted by: Lenleg@aol.com
Len,
How much oil are you starting with???
Many of these Lycomings will "blow out" the 8th (or even 7th) quart of oil.
I have found that once they get around 6.5 quarts, the bottom seems to
remain clean and the perceived oil "consumption" seems to stabilize.
I started with 8 quarts but my A&P quickly had me start putting in less to
see where it would stop putting out oil on the belly. I now keep it at 6
quarts but still get it on the belly. I got a note from Kyle about the
orientation of the bevel in the breather tube and I am going to check that
next.
Thanks !!
Len Leggette, RV-8A
Greensboro, NC N910LL
56 hours
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Canopy Cover |
--> RV-List message posted by: Lenleg@aol.com
Jim:
I bought from Bruce's Custom Covers out of California because I wanted some
accent colors on the cover to match my paint scheme and I wanted the N number
on it.
They were the only people I could find that could do both .... expensive but
I am very pleased !!
Len Leggette, RV-8A
Greensboro, NC N910LL
56 hours
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: large OD, thin wall tubing? |
--> RV-List message posted by: HCRV6@aol.com
Aircraft Spruce has 3" and 4" O.D. tubing in .035 and .049 wall thickness
that you can buy by the foot. Page 70 of my 2001/2002 catalog.
Harry Crosby
Pleasanton, California
RV-6, firewall forward
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
"'RV-9 LIST'" <rv9-list@matronics.com>
Subject: | AOA audio out to UPS/Apollo GX-65 intercom |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Nightingale Michael" <NightingaleMichaelV@JohnDeere.com>
Question:
Can the audio output (Bitching Betty) of the Proprietary Software AOA (Angle
of Attack) be tied parallel to head phone output of the com. radio/intercom
of a UPS GX-65. The AOA has output impedances of 560 Ohms & 26 Ohms and
also has a volume control. We would like to use just the built-in intercom
of GX-65.
Thanks
RV-9A
90259
Michael V. Nightingale
DEERE & Co. Computer Center
400 19th ST.
Moline, IL. 61265
pager 563-327-7891
nightingalemichael@johndeere.com
Message 23
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: DC Headset Retrofit |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
I think you're referring to Meyer Aviation. Their web site is...
http://www.dipple.com/jmeyer/
My own product review is at...
http://www.rv-8.com/IdeasProducts.htm
Randy Lervold
RV-8, 295 hrs
www.rv-8.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Embree" <rembree@sympatico.ca>
Subject: RV-List: DC Headset Retrofit
> --> RV-List message posted by: Roger Embree <rembree@sympatico.ca>
>
> Can someone please point me to the guy in Michigan who does the mods to
> the David Clark headsets. Someone has a link on their website but I
> forgot to bookmark it.
>
> Also, perhaps a thread could be started on taking pictures from inside
> the fishbowl. I have tried taking shots from inside my RV4 but I always
> get reflections. I talked to my brother about it (RV3) and he said "All
> I got were pictures of my instrument panel" . Does someone have tips or
> do's and don'ts.
> TIA
>
> Roger Embree
> RV4 CGIRH
> Collingwood Ont
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 24
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Prop testing data posted |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
> How do you account for the 10 degree OAT difference in the
> cruise table?
Good question, I don't know how to mathematically compensate for it. Van saw
my data and said that he thought it wouldn't make that much difference, and
that when taken in context with the rest of the tests he thought it was
probably an accurate reflection. Of course there's always a +/- tolerance
involved, none of this testing is perfect.
Randy Lervold
Message 25
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net>
George McNutt wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: "George McNutt" <gmcnutt@intergate.ca>
>
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: -------
>
>
> --------------big snip ---------------------
>
> It just irritates the hell out of me when I hear people say well I might
> be in a situation where I can't help flying into some kind of adverse
> weather, that is total BS, anyone with their eyeballs open can see what
> kind of weather they are flying in and take preventative action.
> Anyone that flies into know weather conditions beyond their experience
> or the ability of their aircraft should maybe take up basket weaving.
>
> I guess with this one I better get out the old flame suit.
> -----------------------------
>
> (1) Eyeballs!
>
> Yes - since you suggested it here is your flame, and possibly a new
> discussion.
>
> - It would not be good PR for flight schools or the aviation industry to
> advertise the fact that the human visual system is one of the weakest
> components of our VFR flight system. There are many situations where you, or
> myself, could fly into the ground, water, cloud or another aircraft without
> being able to detect same with our mark one eyeballs!!
> If you disagree try flying across Greenland without your altimeter.
>
> The next time you line up on the runway remember that your depth perception
> system reaches all the way out to the first runway light, your judgment of
> how far away distant objects are is based on experience not your eyeballs,
> judging your distance from some cloud is impossible.
>
> Unfortunately life is to short to experience all the lighting, weather, and
> optical illusions that one can encounter in flying, however experience and
> training can prevent many of the risks associated with our inadequate
> (20/20) mark one eyeballs.
>
Gee Gorge I guess maybe if that is the case I just as well put on
blinders and go fly. :-) Yes eyeballs can be tricked, BUT in the end
it is still a see and be seen environment. I am not talking necessarily
about judging distances from clouds I am talking about seeing the damn
thing in the first place. It is not judging distance from them that is
the problem it is idiots sitting there in the cockpit fat dumb and happy
and pushing into weather they or their airplane have no business flying
into. My goal is to have people set limits for their themselves based on
their experience. If a person does not have experience to judge how far
they are from the clouds or any situation they don't have experience
with stay away from it tell you can make a informed decision. I agree
with you that experience and training and I might add common sense are
the key to long flying carriers. If it seems I am harping on this
weather and ability thing it is because I have lost more friends by
flying into weather situations than any other aspect of flying.
Jerry
do not archive
> (2) Carb Heat
>
> - the FAR's say that at 30 degrees F. your carb heat must produce a 90
> degree F rise at 75% power, I have never had a certified light aircraft
> (with CAT gauge) that could produce that much heat.
>
> I would be interested in hearing from others how much temperature rise their
> RV's (with CAT) are getting when carb heat is selected on.
> In flight my carb temp shows about 10 deg F cooler than the OAT gauge and I
> get about a 15 degree F rise in CAT in flight when the carb heat is selected
> on. On run up on my 6A (0-320) I have a 30 RPM drop when carb heat is
> selected on. I have a custom heat muff about 8" long on one crossover pipe
> and plan a new larger carb heat muff surrounding both crossover pipes.
>
Are you using the FAB from Van? All the heat in the world well not do
you any good if you clog the filter with snow before you use carb heat.
In thinking over the situation I can see how a alternate air source may
be a good thing but I don't like any I have seen so far.
> In flight I am getting higher carb temperature readings with carb heat at
> low power settings (approach) than I do at cruise power.
>
> (3) And the answer as to when carb heat could raise the temperature to the
> point where carb ice could occur, - when flying in ice crystals.
>
>
> George McNutt
> Langley, B.C.
> 6A - 117 hrs
>
Message 26
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Oil on Belly |
--> RV-List message posted by: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net>
I had an airplane one time (not an RV) that kept what I thought was
blowing oil out of the breather. What I discovered was that the breather
tube was to long and a venturi effect was sucking the oil right out of
the engine. Once I shortend the breather tube it stopped.
Jerry
Lenleg@aol.com wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: Lenleg@aol.com
>
> Len,
>
> How much oil are you starting with???
>
> Many of these Lycomings will "blow out" the 8th (or even 7th) quart of oil.
>
> I have found that once they get around 6.5 quarts, the bottom seems to
> remain clean and the perceived oil "consumption" seems to stabilize.
>
>
> I started with 8 quarts but my A&P quickly had me start putting in less to
> see where it would stop putting out oil on the belly. I now keep it at 6
> quarts but still get it on the belly. I got a note from Kyle about the
> orientation of the bevel in the breather tube and I am going to check that
> next.
>
> Thanks !!
>
> Len Leggette, RV-8A
> Greensboro, NC N910LL
> 56 hours
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 27
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Oil on Belly |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Kyle Boatright" <kyle.boatright@adelphia.net>
The venturi effect is exactly what happens if you create a venturi by
misinstalling the breather tube and by providing a source (such as a loose
dipstick) so the venturi can draw air and oil through your engine.
KB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry Springer" <jsflyrv@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV-List: Oil on Belly
> --> RV-List message posted by: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net>
>
> I had an airplane one time (not an RV) that kept what I thought was
> blowing oil out of the breather. What I discovered was that the breather
> tube was to long and a venturi effect was sucking the oil right out of
> the engine. Once I shortend the breather tube it stopped.
>
> Jerry
>
> Lenleg@aol.com wrote:
> > --> RV-List message posted by: Lenleg@aol.com
> >
> > Len,
> >
> > How much oil are you starting with???
> >
> > Many of these Lycomings will "blow out" the 8th (or even 7th) quart of
oil.
> >
> > I have found that once they get around 6.5 quarts, the bottom seems to
> > remain clean and the perceived oil "consumption" seems to stabilize.
> >
> >
> > I started with 8 quarts but my A&P quickly had me start putting in less
to
> > see where it would stop putting out oil on the belly. I now keep it at
6
> > quarts but still get it on the belly. I got a note from Kyle about the
> > orientation of the bevel in the breather tube and I am going to check
that
> > next.
> >
> > Thanks !!
> >
> > Len Leggette, RV-8A
> > Greensboro, NC N910LL
> > 56 hours
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Message 28
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Marvel <bmarvel@cox.net>
Jerry:
SNIP from your post--
> It is not judging distance from them that is
> the problem it is idiots sitting there in the cockpit fat dumb and happy
> and pushing into weather they or their airplane have no business flying
> into. My goal is to have people set limits for their themselves based on
> their experience. If a person does not have experience to judge how far
> they are from the clouds or any situation they don't have experience
> with stay away from it tell you can make a informed decision. I agree
> with you that experience and training and I might add common sense are
> the key to long flying carriers. If it seems I am harping on this
> weather and ability thing it is because I have lost more friends by
> flying into weather situations than any other aspect of flying.
You have hit on a problem that has bothered me too for a long time. I just read
over a synopsis of RV accidents from about 1996 through 2000 and was amazed at
the
number of them caused by either poor judgment or outright stupidity. And the sad
part is that this has gone on in aviation since Day 1.
For instance, how do you convince an individual to land with an hour fuel
remaining as a way of never landing with dry tanks? We all know this and yet you
would not believe the number of airplanes in the listing that have come to grief
because of this exact problem. Many times the pilot later said that the fuel
gauges said he had fuel! We are taught not to trust fuel gauges but to use them
against time and known start quantity as a cross check. What causes pilots to
continue to do this?
Another high item on the list is accidents involving buzzing one's house, business
or gathering of friends. I have read these scenarios so many times that I can't
help but think about them anytime I have notions about doing this. Yes, out in
the boonies I'll get low and fast after looking over the area first from
altitude. But I actually think about it and realize that I have read the results
of doing this without good planning and options.
Options -- to me that is the real issue. If you could only teach pilots to
maintain options and evaluate them when necessary you would go a long way to
addressing these safety issues. After all, isn't judgment primarily maintaining
a
list of options and then going to the best one when the situation dictates?
Flying into lowering weather with diminishing light, mountains ahead and a
temperature/dewpoint spread of zero in a VFR airplane has pretty well taken the
options list down to one -- crash. It had been much longer earlier.
After 9/11 and the restrictions put on our flying (many I think unnecessarily),
I
have become more aware of how free we are to fly and how much we have to lose.
If
John Q. Public learned that a person could build an airplane in his garage, meet
a
test flight regimen and then without anyone's permission or clearance fly right
over the top of LAX as I do a couple of times a week, he would be up in arms and
demand that government "do something about it."
If somehow we could magically reduce the stupid pilot stunts and the foolish
squandering of one's options down to one, we could much better insure our freedom
to fly for a long time to come. How that can be done has been, is now and will
continue to be one of the toughest challenges in general aviation, at least as
I
see it.
Bill Marvel
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Message 29
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Brakes Sticking?? |
--> RV-List message posted by: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut@coalinga.com>
Dan,
Feel the disc (carefully) if they are REAL hot, you may have the pads
dragging. That's what initially occurred on mine. It went away once the
pads wore down a little.
Chuck
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot@yahoo.com>
Subject: RV-List: Brakes Sticking??
> --> RV-List message posted by: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot@yahoo.com>
>
> I have been doing a lot of taxing around the airport
> the last several days. And each time I come back to
> the hangar, I can't push or pull the airplane by
> myself into the hangar. It seems the brakes are
> sticking. How do I correct this problem?
>
> Dan DeNeal
> rv6a - N256GD
>
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/
>
>
Message 30
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net>
Bill Marvel wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: Bill Marvel <bmarvel@cox.net>
>
> Jerry:
>
> SNIP from your post--
>
>
>>It is not judging distance from them that is
>>the problem it is idiots sitting there in the cockpit fat dumb and happy
>>and pushing into weather they or their airplane have no business flying
>>into. My goal is to have people set limits for their themselves based on
>>their experience. If a person does not have experience to judge how far
>>they are from the clouds or any situation they don't have experience
>>with stay away from it tell you can make a informed decision. I agree
>>with you that experience and training and I might add common sense are
>>the key to long flying carriers. If it seems I am harping on this
>>weather and ability thing it is because I have lost more friends by
>>flying into weather situations than any other aspect of flying.
>
>
> You have hit on a problem that has bothered me too for a long time. I just read
> over a synopsis of RV accidents from about 1996 through 2000 and was amazed at
the
> number of them caused by either poor judgment or outright stupidity. And the
sad
> part is that this has gone on in aviation since Day 1.
>
> For instance, how do you convince an individual to land with an hour fuel
> remaining as a way of never landing with dry tanks? We all know this and yet
you
> would not believe the number of airplanes in the listing that have come to grief
> because of this exact problem. Many times the pilot later said that the fuel
> gauges said he had fuel! We are taught not to trust fuel gauges but to use them
> against time and known start quantity as a cross check. What causes pilots
to
> continue to do this?
>
> Another high item on the list is accidents involving buzzing one's house, business
> or gathering of friends. I have read these scenarios so many times that I can't
> help but think about them anytime I have notions about doing this. Yes, out
in
> the boonies I'll get low and fast after looking over the area first from
> altitude. But I actually think about it and realize that I have read the results
> of doing this without good planning and options.
>
> Options -- to me that is the real issue. If you could only teach pilots to
> maintain options and evaluate them when necessary you would go a long way to
> addressing these safety issues. After all, isn't judgment primarily maintaining
a
> list of options and then going to the best one when the situation dictates?
> Flying into lowering weather with diminishing light, mountains ahead and a
> temperature/dewpoint spread of zero in a VFR airplane has pretty well taken the
> options list down to one -- crash. It had been much longer earlier.
>
> After 9/11 and the restrictions put on our flying (many I think unnecessarily),
I
> have become more aware of how free we are to fly and how much we have to lose.
If
> John Q. Public learned that a person could build an airplane in his garage, meet
a
> test flight regimen and then without anyone's permission or clearance fly right
> over the top of LAX as I do a couple of times a week, he would be up in arms
and
> demand that government "do something about it."
>
> If somehow we could magically reduce the stupid pilot stunts and the foolish
> squandering of one's options down to one, we could much better insure our freedom
> to fly for a long time to come. How that can be done has been, is now and will
> continue to be one of the toughest challenges in general aviation, at least as
I
> see it.
>
> Bill Marvel
>
Well said Bill, I have been thinking about this alternate air source a
lot and agree that it could be benificial. I just do not like what I
have seen so far. I do not remember if it was yours or someone else's
that has the hinge inside the filter that makes me nervous knowing how
these hinges wear with vibtation it would certainly have to be a high
inspection area. There has to be a way to do this with some type of
filtering system for the alternate air. I know of one airplane that did
serious engine damage by injesting parts and I have had emails from
others on the list saying they know of others. These are not all RV's
but the results are the same.
Jerry
do not archive
Message 31
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Marvel <bmarvel@cox.net>
Jerry Springer wrote:
I do not remember if it was yours or someone else's
> that has the hinge inside the filter that makes me nervous knowing how
> these hinges wear with vibtation it would certainly have to be a high
> inspection area. There has to be a way to do this with some type of
> filtering system for the alternate air.
Nope, not mine. In fact, I do not yet have an alternate system installed. I am
standing back on the sidelines, seeing what Van and everyone else does, and learn
from
that. My defense right now is just that I understand the problem. With that
as a
known factor, I make weather decisions accordingly.
Bill Marvel
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Message 32
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: Hal Rozema <hartist1@cox.net>
I've been flying since 1967. Mostly Mooney. PPL ay 70 hrs IFR at 90 hrs flown
48
states, Caribbean, and Canada.
My personal opinion... for what it is worth.... No VFR pilot should be up in anything
less than absolute CAVU unless he is trained and comfortable under instrument
conditions. This includes night VFR.
I have had at least three incidents when rain started to fall from high overcast
into
high humid air and the visibility went to 1/4 mile in less than a minute. 300
radios
all screamed at Center for vectors to the nearest AP and all center did was repeat
over and over "Stay VFR until you have clearance, file with blah blah blah" In
each
case I wanted to get out of all the blind traffic so shot a VOR APR at the nearest
field and broadcast my intentions in the blind on APP and then TWR freq.
I have had the same thing with the beginning of snow, unperfected, and maybe it
evaporates before reaching the ground, but don't count on it. Flying at 8 or 10,000
ft you can't tell either the extent or density of what may occur in any direction.
Please. get IFR training (I don't care whether you get certified so you can file
IFR
flight plans) but that way, we and the non flying public won't have to read about
another fool that "flew, controlled flight into terrain under ICW conditions".
It
hurts all the GA survivors.
Hal Rozema
theplanefolks.net
Message 33
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Brakes Sticking?? |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@usjet.net>
>
> > --> RV-List message posted by: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot@yahoo.com>
> >
> > I have been doing a lot of taxing around the airport
> > the last several days. And each time I come back to
> > the hangar, I can't push or pull the airplane by
> > myself into the hangar. It seems the brakes are
> > sticking. How do I correct this problem?
> >
> > Dan DeNeal
> > rv6a - N256GD
>
Dan, is this a new airplane? The brake disks come from Van's with a
coat of paint on them, which should be removed with lacquer thinner or
similar before being used. Paint goo could be the problem.
Alex Peterson
Maple Grove, MN
RV6-A N66AP 259 hours
www.usfamily.net/web/alexpeterson
Message 34
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | [ Karie Daniel ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! |
--> RV-List message posted by: Email List Photo Shares <pictures@matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available:
Poster: Karie Daniel <karie4@attbi.com>
Subject: 7A is home!
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/karie4@attbi.com.02.22.2003/index.html
o Main Photo Share Index
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
o Submitting a Photo Share
If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the
following information along with your email message and files:
1) Email List or Lists that they are related to:
2) Your Full Name:
3) Your Email Address:
4) One line Subject description:
5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic:
6) One-line Description of each photo or file:
Email the information above and your files and photos to:
pictures@matronics.com
Message 35
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: JRWillJR@aol.com
My engine is fuel injected so carb heat as such will not be needed but I may
design such for anti intake ice?
I will install a flapper or similar device which will switch to a totally
alternate air supply, probably air drawn from within the cowl. An
snow as well as FOD or birds could totally clog the main intake, fine, switch
to the alternate. The alternate does not have to be efficient or filtered, it
just needs to provide enough air to keep the engine happy.
I have an Instrument rating. What I learned from getting an Instrument rating
is that I want no part of flying in clouds/poor conditions in small airplanes
as if I did not know that before. Flying in ideal conditions is not possible
all the time but pilots must set limits and then adhere to them.
Yes, landing with a 45 minute reserve is a good idea and the worse the
potential weather is the more conservative that number should become. Do Not
Archive. JR
Message 36
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | [ David Aronson ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! |
--> RV-List message posted by: Email List Photo Shares <pictures@matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available:
Poster: David Aronson <aronsond@pacbell.net>
Subject: Brake Fluid Reservoir RV4
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/aronsond@pacbell.net.02.22.2003/index.html
o Main Photo Share Index
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
o Submitting a Photo Share
If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the
following information along with your email message and files:
1) Email List or Lists that they are related to:
2) Your Full Name:
3) Your Email Address:
4) One line Subject description:
5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic:
6) One-line Description of each photo or file:
Email the information above and your files and photos to:
pictures@matronics.com
Message 37
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Prop testing data posted |
--> RV-List message posted by: Kevin Horton <khorto1537@rogers.com>
At 9:59 AM -0800 22/2/03, you wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
>
>> How do you account for the 10 degree OAT difference in the
>> cruise table?
>
>
>Good question, I don't know how to mathematically compensate for it. Van saw
>my data and said that he thought it wouldn't make that much difference, and
>that when taken in context with the rest of the tests he thought it was
>probably an accurate reflection. Of course there's always a +/- tolerance
>involved, none of this testing is perfect.
>
>Randy Lervold
Randy,
I took a look at your comparative data, and offer the following rough
corrections for the differences in temperature and weight between the
different configurations:
Climb data - the mid-altitude for your climbs was 3500 ft. The
Lycoming power chart suggests the full throttle MP would be about
25.5", and the power would be about 166 hp for both sets of tests.
The RV-6A CAFE report suggests about 138 lb of drag for an RV-6A at
1650 lb. Assuming that drag varies linearly with weight, that gives
a drag of about 143 lb at 1704 lb. The RV-8 should be a tiny bit
cleaner than the RV-6A, so I'll assume 142 lb of drag for the tests
with the Hartzell. 120 mph CAS at 3500 ft at 40 deg F gives about
125 mph TAS, or about 125 x 5280 / 3600 = 183 ft/sec. 142 lb x 183
ft/sec / 550 ft-lb/sec/hp = 47.3 hp required to maintain level flight.
You measured a temperature of about 40 deg F, which is a bit colder
than standard temperature. With non-standard temperatures there is a
barometric altitude error to correct for (i.e. 1000 of barometric
altitude change is actually a bit less than 1000 ft real altitude
change). You measured a barometric climb rate of 1659 ft/min with
the Hartzell. We need to multiply your measured rate of climb by
the ratio of actual temperature to the standard temperature for this
altitude, with both values express as absolute temperatures. Using
degrees Kelvin, this translates to a real climb rate of 1659 x (277.6
/ 288.12) = 1598 actual feet per minute.
Now, rate of climb = excess power (x 33,000 ft-lb/hp) / weight. Or,
excess power = rate of climb x weight / 33,000. 1598 x 1704 / 33,000
= 82.5 hp. 47.3 hp required for level flight + 82.5 hp excess for
the climb = 129.5 hp that must be produced by the prop. If the
engine was producing 166 hp, and the prop produced 129.8 hp, that
means the prop efficiency was about 78.3%, which is quite believable.
On a standard day, the engine would be producing a bit less power,
and the TAS would be a bit higher (which means a bit more power is
required to maintain level flight). That translates to a predicted
rate of climb at 1704 lb of about 1575 ft/min, or about 23 ft/min
less than at the test conditions.
With the Whirlwind prop, I calculate a real rate of climb at the test
conditions of about 1645 ft/min, and a prop efficiency of about
76.8%. At 1704 lb on a standard day, that gives a predicted rate of
climb of about 1525 ft/min. So, if you assume the test data is 100%
accurate to a gazillion decimal places, you would say the Whirlwind
150 produced about a 50 ft/min rate of climb loss compared to the
Hartzell. In reality, there is always a bit of inaccuracy in test
data, so the actual performance difference could be a bit different
from this calculation.
I'll attack the cruise data later - my wife has a long list of things
she thinks I need to do, and I've avoided her about as long as I can
get away with for now.
Cavaet - I haven't done this type of calculation since test pilot
school - now days I let my flight test engineer worry about crunching
the numbers. So, there is certainly a risk that I've fouled this up
slightly, and some careful guy may be able to point his finger at an
error.
--
Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
Ottawa, Canada
http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/
Message 38
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | AOA audio out to UPS/Apollo GX-65 intercom |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Norman" <jgnorman@tampabay.rr.com>
It can be done.
The installation manual describes how it is done.
I have done this, except mine goes into the SL15MS... but the GX65 will
allow it also.
jim
tampa
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Nightingale
Michael
Subject: RV-List: AOA audio out to UPS/Apollo GX-65 intercom
--> RV-List message posted by: "Nightingale Michael"
<NightingaleMichaelV@JohnDeere.com>
Question:
Can the audio output (Bitching Betty) of the Proprietary Software AOA (Angle
of Attack) be tied parallel to head phone output of the com. radio/intercom
of a UPS GX-65. The AOA has output impedances of 560 Ohms & 26 Ohms and
also has a volume control. We would like to use just the built-in intercom
of GX-65.
Thanks
RV-9A
90259
Michael V. Nightingale
DEERE & Co. Computer Center
400 19th ST.
Moline, IL. 61265
pager 563-327-7891
nightingalemichael@johndeere.com
Message 39
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Air Box Advisory |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Gary" <rv9er@3rivers.net>
........................... I can not envision that we are flying in dry cold air
that
getting the carb warmed up ( by adding carb heat) to the normal ambient
icing temperature of say 40 degrees temp before the venturi will ever form
ice.
Bernie Kerr, 6A flying, 9A rotary building, SE Fla ( ice is not my
expertise )
Bernie is correct. You will not increase the likelihood of forming ice by raising
the temperature of a given mass of air. The reason one sample of 45 degree
air will form carb ice, and another sample of cooler air will not would be because
the 45 degree air has more moisture in it.
If you take a mass of air at a lower temperature, and heat it up without adding
any moisture, the relative humidity goes down, and so does the chance of forming
ice.
Rather than modify the system to bypass the filter, I would rather install a carb
heat system which effectively raises the air temperature. The systems I see
on many RV's look poor in that respect to me. It appears that most of the heating
is due to the air having passed over the cylinders, not due to briefly
passing the exhaust pipe.
I guess these systems have been in common use because Lycomings are not very susceptible
to carb ice due to the intake design.
I plan to make a carb heat muff that will do a more effective job of heating the
air.
Gary
---
Message 40
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Sears" <sears@searnet.com>
> My personal opinion... for what it is worth.... No VFR pilot should be up
> in anything less than absolute CAVU unless he is trained and comfortable >
under instrument conditions. This includes night VFR.
>
Oh, I really hate to read that kind of opinion. I'm a 1860+ hour VFR pilot
who has never turned in a claim on my insurance and has never dinged an
airplane other than normal wear and tear. I've got almost 1000 hours of
cross country time and quite a bit of night flight, as well. I think I'd
rather be in command of the airplane I'm in than to be in one with a IFR
pilot who flys every once in a while. Let's not forget those professional
folks who fly their Bonanzas into the soup and kill themselves and their
families just because they have that IFR rating. Be careful how you express
your opinions on this list. The toes you step on may be the ones who will
come back to haunt you. It's not what ratings we have that counts. It's
how we use them.
Jim Sears in KY
RV-6A N198JS
EAA Tech Counselor
do not archive
Message 41
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: RGray67968@aol.com
Len,
I don't think this was mentioned.........but most folks have a
'whistle hole' in the breather tube. This will break any 'venturi' effect
created by the passing air. I have a 1/2" ID metal tube about 16" long bent
at about 70deg that the breather hose goes into. The other end is clamped to
the upper 'side' of the exhaust pipe per Vans. The 'whistle hole' (1/4") is
on the 'inside' at the start of the radius of the bend. No separator......no
venturi.......no oil on belly.
Rick Gray RV6 w/145 hrs in Ohio at the Buffalo Farm - snow's melting so we
finally got up today - what a fun airplane -
hit the archives
> >I had an airplane one time (not an RV) that kept what I thought was
> >blowing oil out of the breather. What I discovered was that the breather
> >tube was to long and a venturi effect was sucking the oil right out of
> >the engine. Once I shortend the breather tube it stopped.
> >
> >Jerry
> >
> >Lenleg@aol.com wrote:
> >>--> RV-List message posted by: Lenleg@aol.com
> >>
> >>Len,
> >>
> >>How much oil are you starting with???
> >>
> >>Many of these Lycomings will "blow out" the 8th (or even 7th) quart of
> oil.
> >>
> >>I have found that once they get around 6.5 quarts, the bottom seems to
> >>remain clean and the perceived oil "consumption" seems to stabilize.
> >>
> >>
> >>I started with 8 quarts but my A&P quickly had me start putting in less
> to
> >>see where it would stop putting out oil on the belly. I now keep it at
> 6
> >>quarts but still get it on the belly. I got a note from Kyle about the
> >>orientation of the bevel in the breather tube and I am going to check
> that
> >>next.
> >>
> >>Thanks !!
> >>
> >>Len Leggette, RV-8A
> >>Greensboro, NC N910LL
> >>56 hours
Message 42
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-List Digest: 30 Msgs - 02/21/03 |
--> RV-List message posted by: PSPRV6A@aol.com
Air-box advisory, carb heat & mixture subject: As any of you know who
have flown with me or listened to my talks, I am the original "mixture-EGT
nut". The point I try to make is that declining EGT is usually your first
hint of carb ice. Carb ice is likely to make the mixture richer and cause
the EGT to drop. This will usually be before you detect any loss of power,
as the richer mixture will mask the power loss for awhile. Keep in mind that
EGT is necessary to get rid of the ice!
EGT is just like money: you need it most when you don't have any! OK,
I'll get off the soapbox now, but I wouldn't fly without good visual
indication of EGT. Your mileage may vary!! Paul S.
Petersen, RV6A 90% done, 50% to go.
Message 43
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Marvel <bmarvel@cox.net>
JR:
> --> RV-List message posted by: JRWillJR@aol.com
>
> My engine is fuel injected so carb heat as such will not be needed but I may
> design such for anti intake ice?
> I will install a flapper or similar device which will switch to a totally
> alternate air supply, probably air drawn from within the cowl. An
> snow as well as FOD or birds could totally clog the main intake, fine, switch
> to the alternate. The alternate does not have to be efficient or filtered, it
> just needs to provide enough air to keep the engine happy.
I know of two RV-6s, one with an IO-360 and one with an IO-320 which have
automatic, spring loaded doors in the induction system downstream of the air
filter. Both of these airplanes are under construction and have not yet flown.
Bill Marvel
Message 44
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Brakes Sticking?? |
--> RV-List message posted by: Gary Zilik <zilik@direcpc.com>
First of all quit taxiing and start flying. If you have a new or
overhauled engine taxiing is the worst thing you could possibly do to it.
As for the brakes; Depending on how old your parts are there was a mess
of Cleveland cylinders with weak springs that needed replacement. The
matco master cylinders (internal spring) is now standard and this
problem does not apply. I find that many builders install all the
hardware a little to tight on the pedals so to keep the loose play to a
minimum. This is about the only place where you want everything a little
loose so that there can be no binding of the pedals. Make sure
everything is loose, and if you have the external springs then maybe you
need new replacements.
One post mentioned the paint on the disks as a possible problem. I think
the paint rubs off on the first application of brakes but this could
possibly add to the problem. Also if the brakes are dragging so bad that
you cannot push the plane then they are real hot too. This can be hard
on the seals. I had one dragging and it got hot enough to melt the
elastic insert in the fiber locknuts. Ruined the internal seal too.
Gary
Dan denial wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot@yahoo.com>
>
>I have been doing a lot of taxing around the airport
>the last several days. And each time I come back to
>the hangar, I can't push or pull the airplane by
>myself into the hangar. It seems the brakes are
>sticking. How do I correct this problem?
>
>Dan DeNeal
>rv6a - N256GD
>
>http://taxes.yahoo.com/
>
>
>
>
Message 45
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: >Re: Dragging Brakes |
--> RV-List message posted by: Oldsfolks@aol.com
I had the brake problem and I removed the master cylinder return springs and
stretched them about an inch. That solved the problem. The pressure isn't
released until the last .065 " of travel .
Bob Olds A&P , EAA Tech. Counselor
RV-4 , N1191X , Flying Now
Charleston, Arkansas
"Real Aviators Fly Taildraggers"
Message 46
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: > Re: UV Smoothprime- What is Crosslink |
--> RV-List message posted by: Oldsfolks@aol.com
The crosslink is a necessary component. You can calculate the ratio for mix
from the directions. I mixed about two ounces at a time , and I think it was
something like 1 cc crosslink to 2 oz. Smoothprime.
At the cost of the stuff you won't want t waste it.
It really works ,when rolled on with a firm roller, to fill pinholes in
@#$
& fibreglas.
Bob Olds A&P , EAA Tech. Counselor
RV-4 , N1191X , Flying Now
Charleston, Arkansas
"Real Aviators Fly Taildraggers"
Message 47
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Serious Oil dump on the bottom of plane |
--> RV-List message posted by: Dave Bristol <bj034@lafn.org>
Mike,
I know that you found your problem but just a comment about the "whistle slot"
for others that might have a similar
problem.
The whistle slot also breaks the suction that you will have in the tube if it exits
in a low pressure area. I had this
problem on my Stinson and it was completely cured by the whistle slot. The slot
should be well up into the cowling in
an area of relatively high pressure.
Dave RV6 So.Cal
mstewart@qa.butler.com wrote:
>
> 4. Asked me if i had a whistle slot in my tube. (Answer no. But I
> could put one in. My understanding of the whistle slot function, and
> my aeronca has one, is that in the event of an end clogged breather,
> the case gets another chance to breath. Now assuming I had a clogged
> breather, wouldn't that cause the oil to pop out someplace OTHER
> than the breather tube?)
Message 48
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Fw: Van's Aircraft RV Survey |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Daniel A. Storer" <storerda@cox.net>
I am a graduate student at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and
currently researching data for my Graduate Research Report (GRP). I am an
aviation enthusiast, and a future RV 9A builder.
My GRP is titled "Federal Aviation Regulations and Amateur Built Aircraft".
I am taking a survey of RV builders and their experience during the
construction and flight test of their kits. Please take a moment and visit
my survey web site at www.mustang-cobra.com/storer/storer1.asp Please pass
this email to any other RV builder you may know. I will close the survey
date on March 1, 2003, so please take the survey as early as possible. I
will have the results of the survey and my research report available for
viewing in April. My ultimate goal is aviation safety, and I thank you in
advance for your assistance with my research. Please feel free to contact
me with your comments.
Your friend in safety,
Daniel A. Storer
Oklahoma City
Message 49
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
"Rocket List" <rocket-list@matronics.com>
--> RV-List message posted by: "Tom Gummo" <t.gummo@verizon.net>
Guys,
John Harmon of Harmon Rocket Fame and his wife stopped by Apple Valley
Airport (APV) today for a couple of hours. I wish I had a better memory but
he stated that there was a hangar fire and three Harmon Rockets under
construction were destoryed. I believe there were several RV involved too.
Sorry, I don't remember where and don't know any of the names, but my best
wishes go out to all the owner-builders in the hangar.
Tom Gummo
Apple Valley CA
Harmon Rocket N561FS - 104 Hours
Flies GREAT.
Message 50
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Prop testing data posted |
--> RV-List message posted by: LeastDrag93066@aol.com
The Lycoming performance chart has in fine print a 0.1" mp correct for each
10 degrees f of temperature difference for the standard temperature.
So for your 10 degrees difference in OAT (degrees f?), it would be the same
as 0.1" mp. Higher Temp = lower MP. Lower Temp = higher MP.
My interpretation of the Lycoming chart is that engine performance show be
based on density altitude. I been using full throttle at 7,500 feet density
altitude as a performance standard.
Jim Ayers
RV-3 N37RV sn 50 LOM M332A engine MT electric CS three blade prop :-)
Message 51
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Sensenich Prop (was Prop testing data posted) |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com>
Hey guys,
Speaking of prop testing data, I have a similar (but different) question. I
know this thread has been about C/S props, but mine is about the FP
Sensenich. Here's my question,
Has anyone twinted these beyone 85"?????
I ask because of my data:
I have a 180hp AEIO-360/B4A Lyc swinging an 85" sensenich.
Static RPM 2250 - Full throttle up to 10.5K I can easily run to 2750-2800+
RPM.
I have a solid (aerobatic) crank, so I can't use a C/S, but I'm wondering if
I can put in a couple more inches of twist without harming the prop.
#1) Is this wise?
#2) Would I lose too much static RPM to offset the top end gain?
Basically I'm just looking for a way to utilize some more hp at slower
RPM's. I don't cruise around at 2750-2800RPM, usually around 2500. My
engine is used, came off a Pitts, and I suspect it may be putting out a bit
more HP than I originally thought. The logs are a bit vague about what was
done at the last OH (600hrs ago), so I don't know if it's stock or not, I
just know it runs like a banshee!
Thanks in advance for any tips,
Stein Bruch
RV6, Minneapolis.
Oh, and YES the C/S guys can out-climb me, but I keep up just fine (or
better) on the top end.
Message 52
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Eyeballs & Carb Heat |
--> RV-List message posted by: JRWillJR@aol.com
In a message dated 2/22/2003 8:18:10 PM Central Standard Time,
bmarvel@cox.net writes:
> I know of two RV-6s, one with an IO-360 and one with an IO-320 which have
> automatic, spring loaded doors in the induction system downstream of the
> air
> filter. Both of these airplanes are under construction and have not yet
> flown.
>
Yes, I haver seen similar designs, thanks for the tip. This alternate air
thing is an obvious need and I am sure I will be corrected but on aircraft
such as single engine Cessna aircraft the alternate air is the unfiltered air
supplied via the carb heat. Just because carb heat is not a needed item on a
fuel injected engine does not mean I cannot install a similar two-way box,
one inlet from the air filter and the other straight from within the cowl.
This is not rocket science, it is really very simple, and nothing against
Vans or anyone else but since I am the manufacturer mine will have alternate
air regardless of what Van or anyone else does with theirs. I saw a bird
jammed in the inlet of a Grumman once, a grackel, darned if that Grumman
wasn't mine, there was a couple of more that wound up on top of the engine
also and a bunch of feathers and some bloody spots on the wing, that carb
heat did fine for me. Do not archive. JR
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|