Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:14 AM - Re: gascolators (JNice51355@aol.com)
2. 03:21 AM - Re: gascolators (Jim Sears)
3. 03:35 AM - Looking for an RV7 engine. (Tony Speranza)
4. 05:02 AM - Re: Aileron Removal (Dana Overall)
5. 06:23 AM - Re: carb repair vs. Ellison TBI (glenn.williams@businessacft.bombardier.com)
6. 06:26 AM - Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... (SportAV8R@aol.com)
7. 06:32 AM - Re: gascolators (Scott Bilinski)
8. 07:32 AM - Re: gascolators (RV3)
9. 07:46 AM - Re: Elevator Stiffener ?s (Bill Dube)
10. 07:52 AM - Re: Aileron Removal (Bill Dube)
11. 08:04 AM - Re: Garmin 196 in panel (Larry Bowen)
12. 08:12 AM - Registration numbers (Al Grajek)
13. 08:14 AM - Re: gascolators (Scott Bilinski)
14. 08:27 AM - Re: Elevator Stiffener ?s (Michael McGee)
15. 08:34 AM - Re: Aileron Removal-OT (Dana Overall)
16. 08:43 AM - Re: Registration numbers (Scott Bilinski)
17. 08:58 AM - Strobes... (Bill VonDane)
18. 09:10 AM - Re: Garmin 196 in panel (Bill VonDane)
19. 09:38 AM - Streamline Tubing CAD file (Bill Dube)
20. 10:18 AM - Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... (HCRV6@aol.com)
21. 10:46 AM - Re: Registration numbers (HCRV6@aol.com)
22. 10:55 AM - Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... ()
23. 11:09 AM - Re: Wing Kit Questions (czechsix@juno.com)
24. 11:11 AM - Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... (czechsix@juno.com)
25. 11:36 AM - Cowl Installation (Vincent Welch)
26. 11:48 AM - Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop (Richard Bibb)
27. 11:51 AM - Nelson Flightfest 2003 Sept 6-7, 2003 (Terence Gannon)
28. 12:05 PM - Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... (Garry LeGare)
29. 12:27 PM - Re: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop (Scott Bilinski)
30. 12:51 PM - OAT probes (Frazier, Vincent A)
31. 12:56 PM - Re: Elevator Stiffener ?s (Charlie & Tupper England)
32. 01:00 PM - Re: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop (Don Mack)
33. 01:02 PM - Re: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop (John Furey)
34. 01:18 PM - Re: Garmin 196 in panel (Chuck Weyant)
35. 01:40 PM - Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... (Kevin Horton)
36. 02:47 PM - Re: Garmin 196 in panel (Bill VonDane)
37. 02:53 PM - Re: Nelson Flightfest 2003 Sept 6-7, 2003 (Bartrim, Todd)
38. 03:05 PM - Re: Garmin 196 in panel (Mark Nielsen)
39. 03:29 PM - carb repair vs. Ellison TBI (David.vonLinsowe)
40. 04:19 PM - Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... (David.vonLinsowe)
41. 04:50 PM - Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... (Lenleg@aol.com)
42. 07:36 PM - MCW Pre-Oshkosh Formation Clinic (Stuart B McCurdy)
43. 07:56 PM - RV 4 parts for sale (Doug Weiler)
44. 08:17 PM - Re: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop (Tom Webster)
45. 08:40 PM - Fw: Van's Request for Interest in Purchasing Finished Fuel Tanks for 7/8/9 Kits (Dan Checkoway)
46. 09:22 PM - Re: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop (Jim Cimino)
47. 09:34 PM - Re: Cowl Installation (Jordan Grant)
48. 10:40 PM - Re: SL-40 vs xcom760 (Leland)
Message 1
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: JNice51355@aol.com
In a message dated 7/15/03 6:45:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
versadek@earthlink.net writes:
> when you flow over
> 15 gallons per hour thru the most commonly used gascolator, exposed to
> the vibration level of a blender, there is just not a whole bunch of
> settling going on.
I would have to agree. I've got a Cherokee with a stock gascolator. I've
never found any water in the gascolator, ever, although I did find a piece of a
bugs(wasp) body lodged in the drain valve causing it to drain slowly. The
only water I've ever found was in the wing tank sumps, and only after washing the
airplane without taping off the fuel vents.(and then, not very much water,
maybe a half thimble full)
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Sears" <sears@searnet.com>
I've been watching this thread a little since it's one that pops up at least once
per year. In defense of those who are anti-gascolator types, I'm also one
who doesn't see the need for one. I had one in my old C172 and didn't like it
because it was prone to leaks. My AA-5A Cheetah did not have one. I flew that
airplane for over nine years and didn't crash and burn due to the lack of one.
In fact, I rarely saw water in the bottom of the fuel pump. It had one of
the round Facet types that had a place for settling and a small screen. I really
liked the little screen for catching anything big enough to cause harm.
When I built my -6A, I decided the gascolator was one thing I could do without
to make my fuel system even more simple and more like that on the Cheetah. In
fact, I even used the same kind of fuel pump that the Cheetah had. I've not
regretted my decision. I see very little water in the tank checks and have yet
to see it in the pump at inspections.
I still can't convince two of my friends that the gascolator is not needed. The
project I've just helped to complete has one. I guess it will give him a warm
fuzzy to have it. I'd be constantly worried about when it's going to leak.
Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
Jim Sears in KY
RV-6A N198JS
EAA Tech Counselor
do not archive
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Looking for an RV7 engine. |
07/16/2003 06:34:23
--> RV-List message posted by: Tony Speranza <asperan@us.ibm.com>
Hi, I'm just starting my RV7. I'd like to find a good rebuildable engine
core. I'd prefer an O360 but would consider a 320. I have a really nice
1978 Triumph Bonneville motorcycle. It's valued at $4700 and I'd like to
swap. Runs great, numbers all match (engine/transmission never been
apart), less then 7000 original miles, original except for new paint, seat
cover, cables, gaskets etc. A really fun British classics. Please call
Tony 802-878-7377 if interested. Thanks.
(See attached file: triumph.bmp)
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Aileron Removal |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com>
Guy, I don't know how your ailerons attach but the RV series uses a bearing
brackets mounted to the aft spar, one on each side of the aileron. The
aileron is simply removed by removing two bolts plus the rod end bearing
tipped push rod. Pretty much a non event.
Dana Overall
Richmond, KY
RV-7 slider/fuselage
Finish kit ordered!! Buying Instruments
http://rvflying.tripod.com
do not archive
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: carb repair vs. Ellison TBI |
07/16/2003 07:49:14 AM
--> RV-List message posted by: glenn.williams@businessacft.bombardier.com
Here is my opinion for what it's worth. I would personally have the carb
rebuilt and stay with it. Here's my reasoning.
carb Pro's
1. simplicity
2. less prone to vapor lock
3. easier starting.
4. easier to maintain
5. price for overhaul compared to injection is cheaper
carb cons
1. carb ice
2. must use the scoop on the cowl
3. gums up
4. more labor intensive than injection
injection pros
1. streamlined installation
2. better fuel management to cylinders
3. shouldnt have to worry about carb ice
4. doesnt gum up like the carb
injection cons
1. cost more
2. vapor lock
3. hard starts
4. more plumbing
5. high fuel pressure inside the cabin
6. complicated system
I am sure there are a lot more pro's and cons that I have not listed here.
Injection in my opinion can be a good thing, however I would think about
your application before installing the injection system on your plane. My
mind set is from the old school way of thinking that if a system aint broke
don't fix it. The carb has been around for years and years and the
injection system although proven is relatively still kinda new in the grand
scheme of things. Bottom line is, it's your airplane and in the
experimental category do what you want to with it. Hence the name
experimental. Hope this helps you somewhat.
Regards
Glenn Williams
do not archive
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... |
--> RV-List message posted by: SportAV8R@aol.com
In a message dated 07/15/2003 5:55:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
khorto1537@rogers.com writes:
> I wonder if what it
> really means is that the temp probe indications are affected by the
> temperature on the back side of the probe - i.e. the cockpit. The
> air in the cockpit is often quite a bit warmer than ambient due to
> the green house effect, so perhaps this is what we are seeing. Or
> maybe not.
>
I considered that possibility several years ago, Kevin, and addressed it by
putting a huge chunk of spray-in-place foam insulation over the back side of
the NACA scopop and the probe body... probably somewhere around R-10-worth of
GreatStuff insulation. I think part of the error is ram, part is hot air
leakage. Perhaps the duct tape test will tell, when I fly with the seams taped
shut...
-Bill
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
Isnt the gascolator after your fuel filter? If yes how did that wasp make
it past?
At 03:13 AM 7/16/03 -0400, you wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: JNice51355@aol.com
>
>In a message dated 7/15/03 6:45:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>versadek@earthlink.net writes:
>
>> when you flow over
>> 15 gallons per hour thru the most commonly used gascolator, exposed to
>> the vibration level of a blender, there is just not a whole bunch of
>> settling going on.
>
>I would have to agree. I've got a Cherokee with a stock gascolator. I've
>never found any water in the gascolator, ever, although I did find a piece
>of a
>bugs(wasp) body lodged in the drain valve causing it to drain slowly. The
>only water I've ever found was in the wing tank sumps, and only after
>washing the
>airplane without taping off the fuel vents.(and then, not very much water,
>maybe a half thimble full)
>
>
Scott Bilinski
Eng dept 305
Phone (858) 657-2536
Pager (858) 502-5190
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: RV3 <rv3@comcast.net>
Scott Bilinski wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
>
> Isnt the gascolator after your fuel filter? If yes how did that wasp make
> it past?
>
>
> >of abugs(wasp) body lodged in the drain valve causing it to drain slowly.
"lodged in the DRAIN VALVE" <===<<<
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Elevator Stiffener ?s |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Dube <bdube@al.noaa.gov>
At 12:49 AM 7/16/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: "" <tx_jayhawk@excite.com>
>
>
>A couple of easy stiffener questions on the 7A:
>
>1) When people have been cutting the taper on the rudder and/or elevator
>stiffeners, how have they been doing it? Do they gut the bulk off
>with WISS snips (and finish with sander/scotchbrite), or do they use the
>file/sander/scotchbrite entirely? I cut the first one with the snips to a
>rough approximation, but it seems like it warped the stiffener a little bit.
I cut them out with a fine blade on my band saw, then rounded the
corners and brought them to final shape with a 1 inch bench belt sander.
After that, I smoothed the edges with a Scotchbrite wheel. Seemed to work
quite well.
>2) When making the elevator -J, K, and L stiffeners, it appears that you
>trim just a tiny bit off of the tapered end of D, E, and F (almost
>negiligible). Is that correct? Is the trimming required due to the taper
>in the elevator (the raised portion is flipped on oppostie
>sides)? Assuming the elevators are identical, I was questioning why one
>set would be trimmed.
In this case, measure three times, then cut. Actually lay out the
stiffeners in the position each one will go before you trim the "odd ball"
ones to size.
The elevators are not identical. One has the trim mechanism, the
other does not. This makes the stiffener layout different on each side.
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Aileron Removal |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Dube <bdube@al.noaa.gov>
> Has anyone have had to
>remove their ailerons from the wings once the plane is flying.?
Most folks find that the propwash makes it too difficult to crawl
out on the wing. :-)
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Garmin 196 in panel |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
I am. Smack-dab in the middle of my panel. I cut a hole to match the
perimeter of the 196. Then attached some .025 angle to the top and bottom
edges of the hole. The seam between the front and back halves of the gps
grabs the angle, securing it in the hole. So far I'm happy with my
installation -- We'll see how it stands the test of time. I'll try to get
some pix/info about it back on my site shortly.......
-
Larry Bowen
Larry@BowenAero.com
http://BowenAero.com
Don Mack said:
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Don Mack" <don@dmack.net>
>
> Has anyone mounted a Garmin 196 IN the panel? I plan on doing so and would
> appreciate any info.
>
> Thanks
>
> Don Mack - RV6A - paneling
> www.dmack.net
>
> do not archive
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
"RV8ListVANS" <rv8list@yahoogroups.com>,
"VansAirForce" <vansairforce@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: | Registration numbers |
Seal-Send-Time: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:12:53 -0400
--> RV-List message posted by: "Al Grajek" <algrajek@msn.com>
Could someone tell me the web page to check for available N numbers, and the process
for reserving one?
Thanks
Al Grajek
RV8A
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
Thats what happens when I read to fast.
At 09:30 AM 7/16/03 -0500, you wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: RV3 <rv3@comcast.net>
>
>Scott Bilinski wrote:
>
>> --> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski
<bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
>>
>> Isnt the gascolator after your fuel filter? If yes how did that wasp make
>> it past?
>>
>>
>
>> >of abugs(wasp) body lodged in the drain valve causing it to drain slowly.
>
> "lodged in the DRAIN VALVE" <===<<<
>
>
Scott Bilinski
Eng dept 305
Phone (858) 657-2536
Pager (858) 502-5190
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Elevator Stiffener ?s |
--> RV-List message posted by: Michael McGee <jmpcrftr@teleport.com>
At 00:49 2003-07-16 -0400, you wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: "" <tx_jayhawk@excite.com>
>
>
>A couple of easy stiffener questions on the 7A:
>
>1) When people have been cutting the taper on the rudder and/or elevator
>stiffeners, how have they been doing it? Do they gut the bulk off
>with WISS snips (and finish with sander/scotchbrite), or do they use the
>file/sander/scotchbrite entirely? I cut the first one with the snips to a
>rough approximation, but it seems like it warped the stiffener a little bit.
>
>2) When making the elevator -J, K, and L stiffeners, it appears that you
>trim just a tiny bit off of the tapered end of D, E, and F (almost
>negiligible). Is that correct? Is the trimming required due to the taper
>in the elevator (the raised portion is flipped on oppostie
>sides)? Assuming the elevators are identical, I was questioning why one
>set would be trimmed.
>
>Thanks,
>Scott
Here's what worked well for me. I didn't have much luck using the tin
snips, I kept getting wrinkles along the cut that were hard to get out. I
wanted something that would make the cut in one shot and discovered the
hedge clippers hanging about six feet from my work bench.
http://home.teleport.com/~dianas-rv9a/ConLogR/ConLogR20030703.html
Scroll down a few pictures and you'll get to the part about the hedge
clippers. If you don't have any they are probably less than ten bucks at
your local Home Depot or equivalent. Read all the way through the trimming
part as there is a right and wrong way to do it and now I have some extra
scrap for my experimentation efforts. Drop me a line if you have any
questions.
Mike McGee, RV-4 N996RV, O320-E2G, Hillsboro, OR
13B in gestation mode
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Aileron Removal-OT |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com>
>--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Dube <bdube@al.noaa.gov>
>
>
> > Has anyone have had to
> >remove their ailerons from the wings once the plane is flying.?
>
> Most folks find that the propwash makes it too difficult to crawl
>out on the wing. :-)
That one is right in the ballpark with this one. "Doesn't in concern you
flying across the Gulf single engine". "Nah, my airplane has a placard that
says, "Water landings strictly prohibited";)
Sorry, definitely do not archive.
Dana Overall
Richmond, KY
RV-7 slider/fuselage
Finish kit ordered!! Buying Instruments
http://rvflying.tripod.com
do not archive
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Registration numbers |
--> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
http://registry.faa.gov/aircraft.asp
At 11:12 AM 7/16/03 -0400, you wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: "Al Grajek" <algrajek@msn.com>
>
>Could someone tell me the web page to check for available N numbers, and the
>process for reserving one?
>Thanks
>Al Grajek
>RV8A
>
>
Scott Bilinski
Eng dept 305
Phone (858) 657-2536
Pager (858) 502-5190
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
Anyone just recently wired their -9 for strobes? Was looking for cable lengths
for the wings and to the tail...
Thanks!
-Bill VonDane
RV-8A
www.vondane.com
www.creativair.com
www.epanelbuilder.com
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Garmin 196 in panel |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
This guy makes a plate you can buy that is the same width as your radio
stack and has the 196 cutout already cut... You would then just mount the
196 to this plate and mount it to your panel... I just got one from him for
a panel I am doing and it looks like it is going to work great!
http://www.affordablepanels.com/
-Bill VonDane
RV-8A
www.vondane.com
www.creativair.com
www.epanelbuilder.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@bowenaero.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List: Garmin 196 in panel
--> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
I am. Smack-dab in the middle of my panel. I cut a hole to match the
perimeter of the 196. Then attached some .025 angle to the top and bottom
edges of the hole. The seam between the front and back halves of the gps
grabs the angle, securing it in the hole. So far I'm happy with my
installation -- We'll see how it stands the test of time. I'll try to get
some pix/info about it back on my site shortly.......
-
Larry Bowen
Larry@BowenAero.com
http://BowenAero.com
Don Mack said:
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Don Mack" <don@dmack.net>
>
> Has anyone mounted a Garmin 196 IN the panel? I plan on doing so and would
> appreciate any info.
>
> Thanks
>
> Don Mack - RV6A - paneling
> www.dmack.net
>
> do not archive
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Streamline Tubing CAD file |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill Dube <bdube@al.noaa.gov>
Does anyone have the profile for streamline tubing in CAD or know
the specific NACA profile used?
I want to make a hole in a part with the exact correct shape on a
CNC mill.
Thanks in advance,
Bill Dube'
<bdube@al.noaa.gov>
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Aeronomy Laboratory 2 - Kinetics Group
Mail Stop R/AL2
325 Broadway
Boulder, CO
80305
(303) 497-3933
(303) 497-5822 (fax)
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... |
--> RV-List message posted by: HCRV6@aol.com
Since it's apparent that the NACA duct is not a good place to locate OAT
probes, what kind of success has anyone had with other locations? Several people
have mentioned the wing root, but it seems to me that if there is enough
airflow to give reasonable response time that hot air leaking from the cowl will
still be a factor, true or am I missing something (again)? Anyone out there got
any real data on that location?
Harry Crosby
Pleasanton, California
RV-6, firewall forward
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Registration numbers |
--> RV-List message posted by: HCRV6@aol.com
In a message dated 7/16/03 8:13:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time, algrajek@msn.com
writes:
<< Could someone tell me the web page to check for available N numbers, and
the process for reserving one?
Thanks
Al Grajek
RV8A >>
Try http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/acmain.htm
Harry Crosby
Pleasanton, California
RV-6, firewall forward
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... |
--> RV-List message posted by: <klwerner@comcast.net>
Why not put the OAT Probe behind the Pitot underneath the left wing?
It's (mostly) a shady location, and away from any engine generated heat leakage.
And there is a little disturbed air anyway where the pitot enters the wing, so
why not put one more protrusion (OAT-Probe) right behind it?
Konrad
Do not archive
From: HCRV6@aol.com
To: rv-list@matronics.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: RV-List: of OAT probes and NACA ducts...
--> RV-List message posted by: HCRV6@aol.com
Since it's apparent that the NACA duct is not a good place to locate OAT
probes, what kind of success has anyone had with other locations? Several people
have mentioned the wing root, but it seems to me that if there is enough
airflow to give reasonable response time that hot air leaking from the cowl will
still be a factor, true or am I missing something (again)? Anyone out there
got
any real data on that location?
Harry Crosby
Pleasanton, California
RV-6, firewall forward
Message 23
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Wing Kit Questions |
--> RV-List message posted by: czechsix@juno.com
Hi Scott,
First let me say I'm not flying quite yet, so my advice is not from first-hand
in-flight experience with the specific hardware in question here, but instead
based on a lot of research into the options, the experience of others, and my
perspective as an avionics systems engineer:
1) For the wing leveler, I bought the Trutrak Digitrak unit. It's only a little
more expensive than the Navaid, weighs about the same for the whole system,
and has two big advantages over the Navaid: the control head is solid state,
and the servo has no clutch. Bottom line is (all other things being equal) the
Digitrak will last a lot longer (not as many moving parts to wear out) and operate
with greater precision. I know some of the guys using Navaids are happy
as a clam with these units and this is not meant as an insult to them, I'm glad
they're happy with it. But I know others have had some trouble getting them
set up to work well, and I have a friend with one in his Long-EZ who wants
to replace it with a Digitrak. The reason we put digital solid-state autopilots
in bizjets, fighters and airliners isn't just because it sounds sexy and high-tech
and costs a lot of money, it's because there are decided advantages that
have made spinning gyros obsolete. The Navaid used to offer a good value in
that it offered acceptable performance and was the only thing available in it's
price range that would keep you right side up and more or less on course.
Now you can get superior technology at a very competitive price...the Digitrak.
2) I have an EIS-4000 because of the outstanding reputation from its many users,
and my firsthand experience with Greg Toman at Grand Rapids who has been a
pleasure to work with and has incorporated some custom features in my unit at
no extra cost. I think this unit is the best thing going in the "bang-for-the-buck"
category of digital engine monitors. It's capable, easy to set up and
use, light, inexpensive, reliable, and takes up minimal panel space. The only
disadvantage is that it doesn't have gauge displays like the bigger, pricier
monitors....they are easier for the eye to read and spot trends at a glance than
digital characters alone, but the importance of this is not as great when you
incorporate the limit alarms that the EIS features. The fancier displays are
nice but not necessary.
Fuel probes: the EIS-4000 will work with almost any fuel probe out there, ask
Greg Toman if you want to be sure before buying. I installed Van's float sensors
but then Greg started offering some nice Princeton capacitive probes that
are custom bent and fit for RV tanks, so I bought them to retrofit before I put
the wings on for final assembly. Whatever you do I'd go capacitive...it's not
much more expensive and it should mean you'll never have to service it (as
opposed to the floats, where more than one RV'er has had to pull them out and
change them...not a fun job).
Bottom line is if you want to spend more time flying and less time fixing things,
and save weight and increase reliability, go solid state and eliminate mechanical
moving parts wherever possible. This applies to autopilots, fuel probes,
vacuum pumps (horrors!), gyros of any kind (I've got a Dynon, and no spinning
masses of any sort in my panel), engine instruments, etc. The only exception
to this rule that I can think of is for a prop...the rule still applies in
that a fixed-pitch prop (no moving parts) is more reliable than a constant-speed,
but unlike the other things I've listed, the constant-speed prop has a decided
performance *advantage* in it's favor. I've got fixed-pitch now, but C.S.
is in the long-term plans...
Just my humble $.02, no offense to any vacuum-sucking, steam-gauge-loving, clutch-clinging,
spinning-mass aficionados out there : )
--Mark Navratil
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
RV-8A N2D painting...
Time: 10:00:47 PM PST US
Subject: RV-List: Wing Kit Questions
From: "" <tx_jayhawk@excite.com>
--> RV-List message posted by: "" <tx_jayhawk@excite.com>
I just got the great news that my wing kit shipped today, and I am need to make
some "wing" decisions. I would appreciate any feedback on the following:
1) Wing-leveler (Navaid vs. Trutrak) - Based on bang for the buck (one of my most
dominant considerations), everything I have read in the archives sounds like
the Navaid is a better choice. I do plan to fly IFR, so I will definitely get
one or the other. I would appreciate hearing from anyone that strongly supports
the Trutrak as a better option.
2) Guages (fuel monitoring) - Based on the reputation of some of the Vans-labeled
guages (and installation benefits), I think I will be going with the Grand
Rapids EIS-4000 for engine monitoring. I would appreciate hearing any "dislikes"
people might have with the Grand Rapids (haven't heard many). Also what type
of fuel senders they require (Van's resistive, Van's capacitance, other).
FYI...the fancy ones (Vision, ACS, etc.) are out of my price range.
Thanks,
Scott
7A
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Message 24
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... |
--> RV-List message posted by: czechsix@juno.com
Hey Kevin, that's some really interesting stuff...I had NO idea that ram rise could
amount to several degrees in an RV, I would have guessed it would be too
small to measure! I'll add that to my list of things to impress spam can pilots..."yeah,
she flies so fast I have to subtract several degrees from the OAT
reading because the probe heats up so much..!" Try THAT in your Cessna 150!
He he...
So...where would you recommend putting the OAT probe on an -8 or -8A? I was planning
to put it in the NACA vent in the lower right wing (or duct connected to
it). My thinking was that way it would be shaded, but not enclosed within the
structure such that it would heat up excessively when sitting on the ramp in
the sun. And it would not be affected in flight by heat from the exhaust or
engine. Seems to me that putting it in the wing root fairing for example would
probly work great in flight, but when sitting on the ramp wondering what your
density altitude performance is going to be for that hot/high takeoff, the probe
may be reading much higher than the real air temp due to the air space within
the fairing heating up. Whereas if exposed to the open air in the lower
NACA vent it should be more accurate, at least on the ground??
Where are you putting it on your airplane?
--Mark Navratil
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
RV-8A N2D painting...actually still sanding hi-build primer, those pinholes NEVER
DIE!!
Time: 02:54:14 PM PST US
From: Kevin Horton <khorto1537@rogers.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List: of OAT probes and NACA ducts...
--> RV-List message posted by: Kevin Horton <khorto1537@rogers.com>
>--> RV-List message posted by: SportAV8R@aol.com
>
>I recently coorresponded with Ed Z at Sensenich about a prop re-pitch in the
>wake of horsepower increase and airframe clean-up efforts, and as part of the
>data collection for Ed's advice, I finally realized the magnitude of the temp
>error introduced by placing the OAT probe in the NACA duct on the -6A. The
>erroneously high readings we get from this location have been
>mentioned before,
>and anyone who was still building when this was first discussed probably saw
>trouble coming and placed their probe in a wing root or other shaded location,
>out of the way of hot air leaking from the engine compartment. I was finished
>building by then, so my probe has stayed where it was. By comparing the
>reading I get when the airplane is first powered up with the OAT
>readings obtained
>at low-altitude cruise, I was shocked to see a difference of 6 - 7 degrees C.
> Correcting the TAS calculations for this error is not really my main concern
>here. What this tells me is that the outside air I am drawing into my
>cockpit for ventilation and "free air-conditioning" at altitude is
>about 13 degrees
>F warmer than what should be available for this purpose. No wonder I start to
>swelter in the RV cockpit by about 3500 MSL when I let down at the Outer
>Banks. It's not just the humidity that's the problem! My cockpit
>is being fed
>warm air when cool is available at other pick-off points.
>
>Wonder if others have noticed this much extra heating and where else we can
>cut NACA vents to get away from the unwanted heat. One experiiment I have yet
>to do is fly with the fuselage/cowling joints taped to stop the leakage and
>recheck the temps I get.
>
>-Bill B
Just pondering - Bill figures the high OAT indications are telling
him that the air coming into the NACA scoop is warmer than ambient.
Perhaps it is, but I'm not sure why that would be (other than the ram
temperature rise, which I'll discuss later). I wonder if what it
really means is that the temp probe indications are affected by the
temperature on the back side of the probe - i.e. the cockpit. The
air in the cockpit is often quite a bit warmer than ambient due to
the green house effect, so perhaps this is what we are seeing. Or
maybe not.
Note: there is a bit of ram rise at play here too. The maximum
amount of ram rise in deg C is equal to TAS
2/7592, where the TAS is
in kt. So, if we are at 170 kt TAS, the max amount of ram rise would
be 3.8 deg C. Our temperature probes don't recover the full amount
of the ram rise though - the probe recovery factor is probably
somewhere between 0.7 and 1, so the actual amount of ram rise at this
condition is likely between 2.6 and 3.8 deg C.
So, depending on whether Bill has accounted for the ram rise or not,
the amount of error might not be quite as much as he reported.
However, it is still an error, and it makes sense to not put OAT
probes in NACA scoops.
--
Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
Ottawa, Canada
http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Message 25
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Cowl Installation |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Vincent Welch" <welchvincent@hotmail.com>
Hey Guys, I just started looking at the installation for my RV-8A cowl. I
don't see anything that supports it at the front end near the prop hub.
Does it just rest on the baffle seal fabric? The plans show the front of
the cowl being located 1/8" higher than the prop hub, what holds it up
there?
Vince Welch
Message 26
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Richard Bibb" <richard.bibb@verizon.net>
Looking for a fuel stop enroute to Oshkosh someplace around Columbus, Ohio.
Looking fro cheap gas as I won't be flyying the RV this time but a T-6 and
cheap gas is kinda a necessity.
Any suggesstions?
Richard Bibb
RV-4 N144KT
T6-G N3518G
Message 27
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Nelson Flightfest 2003 Sept 6-7, 2003 |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Terence Gannon" <terence.gannon@telus.net>
For those of you that might still be in the area the weekend after Van's
Homecoming, this is an event you might consider putting on your fly-in
calendar and taking in. Looks like a lot of fun, and a beautiful
location in the Kootenays, in British Columbia. Great accommodation and
amenities are all within walking distance of the airport. Here's the
link;
http://www.flynorth.com/nelson.html
There's a link at the bottom of the page if you have any additional
questions. Hope to see you there!! Cheers.
Terry in Calgary
RV-6 S/N 24414
"Wings"
Message 28
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... |
--> RV-List message posted by: Garry LeGare <versadek@earthlink.net>
Harry, I ran the one in Casper out behind the fuel tank and stuck it
into the slipstream about a 1/4". it pokes out thru a small grommet so
it isn't influenced by contact with the skin.
HCRV6@aol.com wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: HCRV6@aol.com
>
>Since it's apparent that the NACA duct is not a good place to locate OAT
>probes, what kind of success has anyone had with other locations?
>
>
>
>
Message 29
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop |
--> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
Go here to check out the prices:
http://www.airnav.com/fuel/
At 02:53 PM 7/16/03 -0400, you wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: "Richard Bibb" <richard.bibb@verizon.net>
>
>Looking for a fuel stop enroute to Oshkosh someplace around Columbus, Ohio.
>Looking fro cheap gas as I won't be flyying the RV this time but a T-6 and
>cheap gas is kinda a necessity.
>
>Any suggesstions?
>
>Richard Bibb
>RV-4 N144KT
>T6-G N3518G
>
>
Scott Bilinski
Eng dept 305
Phone (858) 657-2536
Pager (858) 502-5190
Message 30
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "Frazier, Vincent A" <VFrazier@usi.edu>
OAT probes reading high in the NACA vents???
In my experience, when you're OAT probe is any where close to that 400 pound oven
on the front of your plane, the readings will be high.
Take a thermometer and stick it anywhere near the firewall. What do you get?
HOT!
If you want an accurate reading for OAT, you'll need to install it far out on the
bottom of your wing, insulated from stagnant air inside the wing, yet not really
in the slipstream where all of that friction will warm it.
Is it worth the trouble.... nah!
Vince
Message 31
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Elevator Stiffener ?s |
--> RV-List message posted by: Charlie & Tupper England <cengland@netdoor.com>
Michael McGee wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: Michael McGee <jmpcrftr@teleport.com>
>
>At 00:49 2003-07-16 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>>--> RV-List message posted by: "" <tx_jayhawk@excite.com>
>>
>>
>>A couple of easy stiffener questions on the 7A:
>>
>>1) When people have been cutting the taper on the rudder and/or elevator
>>stiffeners, how have they been doing it? Do they gut the bulk off
>>with WISS snips (and finish with sander/scotchbrite), or do they use the
>>file/sander/scotchbrite entirely? I cut the first one with the snips to a
>>rough approximation, but it seems like it warped the stiffener a little bit.
>>
>>2) When making the elevator -J, K, and L stiffeners, it appears that you
>>trim just a tiny bit off of the tapered end of D, E, and F (almost
>>negiligible). Is that correct? Is the trimming required due to the taper
>>in the elevator (the raised portion is flipped on oppostie
>>sides)? Assuming the elevators are identical, I was questioning why one
>>set would be trimmed.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Scott
>>
>>
>
>Here's what worked well for me. I didn't have much luck using the tin
>snips, I kept getting wrinkles along the cut that were hard to get out. I
>wanted something that would make the cut in one shot and discovered the
>hedge clippers hanging about six feet from my work bench.
>http://home.teleport.com/~dianas-rv9a/ConLogR/ConLogR20030703.html
>Scroll down a few pictures and you'll get to the part about the hedge
>clippers. If you don't have any they are probably less than ten bucks at
>your local Home Depot or equivalent. Read all the way through the trimming
>part as there is a right and wrong way to do it and now I have some extra
>scrap for my experimentation efforts. Drop me a line if you have any
>questions.
>
>Mike McGee, RV-4 N996RV, O320-E2G, Hillsboro, OR
>13B in gestation mode
>
That sounds like a great idea. If you must spend more money for an
effective tool, try a band saw with a fine-tooth blade. It worked fine
for me, but I already owned the saw. If you know someone who owns one,
ask to use it for an hour or so. Cutting them to length can be done
with regular tin snips. I used the non-aviation type, cutting just a tad
long from each edge toward the bend. It probably took a little longer on
the scotchbrite wheel, but no deformed angles.
Charlie
Message 32
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Don Mack" <don@dmack.net>
If you can make it to Starke County Indiana (OXI) , you will normally find
some of the cheapest gas around.
http://www.airnav.com/airport/KOXI
--> RV-List message posted by: "Richard Bibb" <richard.bibb@verizon.net>
Looking for a fuel stop enroute to Oshkosh someplace around Columbus, Ohio.
Looking fro cheap gas as I won't be flyying the RV this time but a T-6 and
cheap gas is kinda a necessity.
Any suggesstions?
Richard Bibb
RV-4 N144KT
T6-G N3518G
Message 33
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop |
--> RV-List message posted by: "John Furey" <john@fureychrysler.com>
If you stop at my house you can have it for what I pay, Something under $2 @
gal.
I'm located 20 miles SE of canton, Ohio My Identifier is
5OH9, 2600' of the nicest grass there is.
John Furey
RV6A
330-592-4944
Message 34
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Garmin 196 in panel |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Chuck Weyant" <chuck@chuckdirect.com>
I don't know where you're looking, but I didn't see any 196 bracket plate.
Can you give a better URL?
Chuck do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List: Garmin 196 in panel
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
>
> This guy makes a plate you can buy that is the same width as your radio
> stack and has the 196 cutout already cut... You would then just mount the
> 196 to this plate and mount it to your panel... I just got one from him
for
> a panel I am doing and it looks like it is going to work great!
>
> http://www.affordablepanels.com/
>
>
> -Bill VonDane
> RV-8A
> www.vondane.com
> www.creativair.com
> www.epanelbuilder.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@bowenaero.com>
> To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Re: RV-List: Garmin 196 in panel
>
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
>
> I am. Smack-dab in the middle of my panel. I cut a hole to match the
> perimeter of the 196. Then attached some .025 angle to the top and bottom
> edges of the hole. The seam between the front and back halves of the gps
> grabs the angle, securing it in the hole. So far I'm happy with my
> installation -- We'll see how it stands the test of time. I'll try to get
> some pix/info about it back on my site shortly.......
>
> -
> Larry Bowen
> Larry@BowenAero.com
> http://BowenAero.com
>
> Don Mack said:
> > --> RV-List message posted by: "Don Mack" <don@dmack.net>
> >
> > Has anyone mounted a Garmin 196 IN the panel? I plan on doing so and
would
> > appreciate any info.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Don Mack - RV6A - paneling
> > www.dmack.net
> >
> > do not archive
>
>
Message 35
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... |
--> RV-List message posted by: Kevin Horton <khorto1537@rogers.com>
If you want to really impress them, put in a Mach meter :) And quote
your speeds in km/hr - "Oh yeah, this thing really goes - it cruises
at 320".
I came to the same conclusion you did about where to put the OAT
probe - mine will go in the under wing NACA scoop. I still expect
there may be some error when sitting on the ground on a sunny day, as
the ramp typically warms up above ambient temperatures due to the sun
hitting it, and it probably warms up the air close to the ground. I
really don't expect hot/high T/O performance is going to be a
problem, unless I deliberately go into some stupidly short strip, or
some place with crazy obstacles. Of course the hot/high performance
will be greatly decreased compared to std day/sea level, but it
should still be very acceptable.
Take care,
Kevin
At 6:10 PM +0000 16/7/03, you wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: czechsix@juno.com
>
>
>Hey Kevin, that's some really interesting stuff...I had NO idea that
>ram rise could amount to several degrees in an RV, I would have
>guessed it would be too small to measure! I'll add that to my list
>of things to impress spam can pilots..."yeah, she flies so fast I
>have to subtract several degrees from the OAT reading because the
>probe heats up so much..!" Try THAT in your Cessna 150! He he...
>
>So...where would you recommend putting the OAT probe on an -8 or
>-8A? I was planning to put it in the NACA vent in the lower right
>wing (or duct connected to it). My thinking was that way it would
>be shaded, but not enclosed within the structure such that it would
>heat up excessively when sitting on the ramp in the sun. And it
>would not be affected in flight by heat from the exhaust or engine.
>Seems to me that putting it in the wing root fairing for example
>would probly work great in flight, but when sitting on the ramp
>wondering what your density altitude performance is going to be for
>that hot/high takeoff, the probe may be reading much higher than the
>real air temp due to the air space within the fairing heating up.
>Whereas if exposed to the open air in the lower NACA vent it should
>be more accurate, at least on the ground??
>
>Where are you putting it on your airplane?
>
>--Mark Navratil
>Cedar Rapids, Iowa
>RV-8A N2D painting...actually still sanding hi-build primer, those
>pinholes NEVER DIE!!
>
>
>Time: 02:54:14 PM PST US
>From: Kevin Horton <khorto1537@rogers.com>
>Subject: Re: RV-List: of OAT probes and NACA ducts...
>
>--> RV-List message posted by: Kevin Horton <khorto1537@rogers.com>
>
>>--> RV-List message posted by: SportAV8R@aol.com
>>
>>I recently coorresponded with Ed Z at Sensenich about a prop re-pitch in the
>>wake of horsepower increase and airframe clean-up efforts, and as part of the
>>data collection for Ed's advice, I finally realized the magnitude of the temp
>>error introduced by placing the OAT probe in the NACA duct on the -6A. The
>>erroneously high readings we get from this location have been
>>mentioned before,
>>and anyone who was still building when this was first discussed probably saw
>>trouble coming and placed their probe in a wing root or other
>>shaded location,
>>out of the way of hot air leaking from the engine compartment. I
>>was finished
>>building by then, so my probe has stayed where it was. By comparing the
>>reading I get when the airplane is first powered up with the OAT
>>readings obtained
>>at low-altitude cruise, I was shocked to see a difference of 6 - 7 degrees C.
>> Correcting the TAS calculations for this error is not really my
>>main concern
>>here. What this tells me is that the outside air I am drawing into my
>>cockpit for ventilation and "free air-conditioning" at altitude is
>>about 13 degrees
>>F warmer than what should be available for this purpose. No wonder
>>I start to
>>swelter in the RV cockpit by about 3500 MSL when I let down at the Outer
>>Banks. It's not just the humidity that's the problem! My cockpit
>>is being fed
>>warm air when cool is available at other pick-off points.
> >
>>Wonder if others have noticed this much extra heating and where else we can
>>cut NACA vents to get away from the unwanted heat. One experiiment
>>I have yet
>>to do is fly with the fuselage/cowling joints taped to stop the leakage and
>>recheck the temps I get.
>>
>>-Bill B
>
>Just pondering - Bill figures the high OAT indications are telling
>him that the air coming into the NACA scoop is warmer than ambient.
>Perhaps it is, but I'm not sure why that would be (other than the ram
>temperature rise, which I'll discuss later). I wonder if what it
>really means is that the temp probe indications are affected by the
>temperature on the back side of the probe - i.e. the cockpit. The
>air in the cockpit is often quite a bit warmer than ambient due to
>the green house effect, so perhaps this is what we are seeing. Or
>maybe not.
>
>Note: there is a bit of ram rise at play here too. The maximum
>amount of ram rise in deg C is equal to TAS
>2/7592, where the TAS is
>in kt. So, if we are at 170 kt TAS, the max amount of ram rise would
>be 3.8 deg C. Our temperature probes don't recover the full amount
>of the ram rise though - the probe recovery factor is probably
>somewhere between 0.7 and 1, so the actual amount of ram rise at this
>condition is likely between 2.6 and 3.8 deg C.
>
>So, depending on whether Bill has accounted for the ram rise or not,
>the amount of error might not be quite as much as he reported.
>However, it is still an error, and it makes sense to not put OAT
>probes in NACA scoops.
>
>--
>Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
>Ottawa, Canada
>http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/
>
>The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
>Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
>
>
--
Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
Ottawa, Canada
http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/
Message 36
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Garmin 196 in panel |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
I'm not sure if hew has any pix on his site, but if you call him he can send
one out to you...
-Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Weyant" <chuck@chuckdirect.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List: Garmin 196 in panel
--> RV-List message posted by: "Chuck Weyant" <chuck@chuckdirect.com>
I don't know where you're looking, but I didn't see any 196 bracket plate.
Can you give a better URL?
Chuck do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List: Garmin 196 in panel
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Bill VonDane" <bill@vondane.com>
>
> This guy makes a plate you can buy that is the same width as your radio
> stack and has the 196 cutout already cut... You would then just mount the
> 196 to this plate and mount it to your panel... I just got one from him
for
> a panel I am doing and it looks like it is going to work great!
>
> http://www.affordablepanels.com/
>
>
> -Bill VonDane
> RV-8A
> www.vondane.com
> www.creativair.com
> www.epanelbuilder.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@bowenaero.com>
> To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Re: RV-List: Garmin 196 in panel
>
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
>
> I am. Smack-dab in the middle of my panel. I cut a hole to match the
> perimeter of the 196. Then attached some .025 angle to the top and bottom
> edges of the hole. The seam between the front and back halves of the gps
> grabs the angle, securing it in the hole. So far I'm happy with my
> installation -- We'll see how it stands the test of time. I'll try to get
> some pix/info about it back on my site shortly.......
>
> -
> Larry Bowen
> Larry@BowenAero.com
> http://BowenAero.com
>
> Don Mack said:
> > --> RV-List message posted by: "Don Mack" <don@dmack.net>
> >
> > Has anyone mounted a Garmin 196 IN the panel? I plan on doing so and
would
> > appreciate any info.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Don Mack - RV6A - paneling
> > www.dmack.net
> >
> > do not archive
>
>
Message 37
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Nelson Flightfest 2003 Sept 6-7, 2003 |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Bartrim, Todd" <sbartrim@mail.canfor.ca>
I'd like to add that recently, Nelson which is another lakeside
airport, was threatened with closure much the same way as Meigs, however
city council listened to the many letters of support for the airport and
kept it open for at least another year.
This would be a good opportunity to show them that it is valuable
resource and source of tourist revenue. As I expect to be flying and have
test hours flown off by then, I plan to attend.
Hope to see some of you there!
S. Todd Bartrim
Turbo 13B
RX-9endurance
C-FSTB
http://www3.telus.net/haywire/RV-9/C-FSTB.htm
"Imagination is more important than knowledge"
-Albert Einstein
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terence Gannon [SMTP:terence.gannon@telus.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:58 PM
> To: rv-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV-List: Nelson Flightfest 2003 Sept 6-7, 2003
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Terence Gannon" <terence.gannon@telus.net>
>
> For those of you that might still be in the area the weekend after Van's
> Homecoming, this is an event you might consider putting on your fly-in
> calendar and taking in. Looks like a lot of fun, and a beautiful
> location in the Kootenays, in British Columbia. Great accommodation and
> amenities are all within walking distance of the airport. Here's the
> link;
>
> http://www.flynorth.com/nelson.html
>
> There's a link at the bottom of the page if you have any additional
> questions. Hope to see you there!! Cheers.
>
>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<META NAME"Generator" CONTENT"MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
RE: RV-List: Nelson Flightfest 2003 Sept 6-7, 2003
I'd like to add that recently, Nelson which is another lakeside airport, was threatened
with closure much the same way as Meigs, however city council listened
to the many letters of support for the airport and kept it open for at least
another year.
This would be a good opportunity to show them that it is valuable resource and
source of tourist revenue. As I expect to be flying and have test hours flown
off by then, I plan to attend.
Hope to see some of you there!
S. Todd Bartrim
Turbo 13B
RX-9endurance
C-FSTB
<A HREF"http://www3.telus.net/haywire/RV-9/C-FSTB.htm" TARGET"_blank">http://www3.telus.net/haywire/RV-9/C-FSTB.htm
Imagination is more important than knowledge
-Albert Einstein
-----Original Message-----
From: Terence Gannon [SMTP:terence.gannon@telus.net]
Subject: RV-List: Nelson Flightfest 2003 Sept 6-7, 2003
-- RV-List message posted by: Terence Gannon terence.gannon@telus.net
For those of you that might still be in the area the weekend after Van's
Homecoming, this is an event you might consider putting on your fly-in
calendar and taking in. Looks like a lot of fun, and a beautiful
location in the Kootenays, in British Columbia. Great accommodation and
amenities are all within walking distance of the airport. Here's the
link;
<A HREF"http://www.flynorth.com/nelson.html" TARGET"_blank">http://www.flynorth.com/nelson.html
There's a link at the bottom of the page if you have any additional
questions. Hope to see you there!! Cheers.
Message 38
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RE: Garmin 196 in panel |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Mark Nielsen" <mark.nielsen@fiedler-lp.com>
>
>--> RV-List message posted by: "Don Mack" <don@dmack.net>
>
>Has anyone mounted a Garmin 196 IN the panel? I plan on doing so and
>would
>appreciate any info.
>
>
Don,
I recently completed a panel re-build that included a Garmin 196 mounted
in the panel. I disassembled the yoke mount that came with the 196 and
used the plastic bracket (from the yoke mount) as a holder for the 196.
I made a U-bracket out of 0.040" aluminum (about 2.5" wide) and riveted
it to the back side of panel. The plastic holder was attached to the
U-bracket with screws. The U-bracket was bent so that the screen of the
196 would be perpendicular to my line of sight. I used a full-sized
layout of my panel and a small mirror to determine the bend angles for
the U-bracket.
The 196 is inserted into the plastic holder through the panel cut-out.
To remove the 196, I reach behind the panel and pull on the holder
release lever. For power, I cut the cigarette lighter power cord and
installed a plug that plugs into a power jack mounted on the instrument
panel support bracket.
Mark Nielsen
RV-6, 850 hrs.
Green Bay, WI
Message 39
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | carb repair vs. Ellison TBI |
--> RV-List message posted by: "David.vonLinsowe" <David.vonLinsowe@delphi.com>
Thanks George.
Dave
-----------------------------------------------
Any opinions, experience and/or info?
Thanks,
-------------------------------------------------
Hi David
I am not an expert on this topic but have not seen any other replies so will
take a stab at it.
My aircraft is 0-320 with carburetor and also has a little stumble when
power is slowly applied and about the 1500 - 1700 RPM range. Only happens
occasionally, generally when leveling off from a descent. It is over before
you have time to do anything but skip a single heartbeat.
I have been told that this occurs at the carburetor change-over point
between idle and main jet and is not uncommon. I talked to Lycoming rep. at
Arlington and he suggested two things (1) experiment with linkage on
accelerator pump if it has different holes on the linkage (2) check idle
mixture for 30 RPM rise at idle cut-off.
Good Luck
George McNutt
Langley, B.C. 6-A
Message 40
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... |
--> RV-List message posted by: "David.vonLinsowe" <David.vonLinsowe@delphi.com>
I ran into the higher than normal temps in the NACA duct too. Even with a tight,
honeycomb cowl. Because I was setting up to do some prop testing I needed
to get accurate air temps.
First the old analog gage had to go. The scale was so coarse you'd be lucky to
read it within 5 degrees.
The gage I went with is a Davtron 655. It's a digital volt meter, outside air
temp in F or C, it ties into the encoder and gives you pressure altitude and density
altitude. A little pricey, but what the heck it's in the name of science
:-)
The techs at Davtron told me the probe has to be 4 feet from the fuselage to get
an accurate reading. They told me that Cessna tried mounting the probe on top
of the windshield and couldn't understand why the readings wouldn't match the
readings from the test probe out in the wing tip. They moved the probe away
from the fuselage and the readings agreed.
I mounted the probe in the aileron belcrank inspection plate. It works great out
there. For now it sticks out in the breeze. Once the prop testing is done
it's going to be remounted with a delrin mount I turned up so only about 1/4"
will be exposed (gotta reduce that drag).
Dave
RV-6 the "Silver Turtle"
The need for (more) speed---->
From: "aronsond" <aronsond@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: RV-List: of OAT probes and NACA ducts...
--> RV-List message posted by: "aronsond" <aronsond@pacbell.net>
What is a good source for OAT sensors (12v).
Dave aronson
RV4
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley@qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: RV-List: of OAT probes and NACA ducts...
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Cy Galley" <cgalley@qcbc.org>
>
> I have been told that temperature probes exposed to high speed air flow
read
> HIGH due to friction of the air across the probe.
>
> Cy Galley
> Editor, EAA Safety Programs
> cgalley@qcbc.org or experimenter@eaa.org
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Bilinski" <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
> To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Re: RV-List: of OAT probes and NACA ducts...
>
>
> > --> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski
> <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
> >
> > How can so much heated air come out of the side of the cowl and into the
> > NACA duct??? I can imagine a lot of things but not this.
> >
> >
> > At 03:50 PM 7/15/03 -0400, you wrote:
> > >--> RV-List message posted by: SportAV8R@aol.com
> > >
> > >I recently coorresponded with Ed Z at Sensenich about a prop re-pitch
in
> the
> > >wake of horsepower increase and airframe clean-up efforts, and as part
of
> the
> > >data collection for Ed's advice, I finally realized the magnitude of
the
> temp
> > >error introduced by placing the OAT probe in the NACA duct on the -6A.
> The
> > >erroneously high readings we get from this location have been mentioned
> > >before,
> > >and anyone who was still building when this was first discussed
probably
> saw
> > >trouble coming and placed their probe in a wing root or other shaded
> > location,
> > >out of the way of hot air leaking from the engine compartment. I was
> > finished
> > >building by then, so my probe has stayed where it was. By comparing
the
> > >reading I get when the airplane is first powered up with the OAT
readings
> > >obtained
> > >at low-altitude cruise, I was shocked to see a difference of 6 - 7
> degrees C.
> > > Correcting the TAS calculations for this error is not really my main
> concern
> > >here. What this tells me is that the outside air I am drawing into my
> > >cockpit for ventilation and "free air-conditioning" at altitude is
about
> 13
> > >degrees
> > >F warmer than what should be available for this purpose. No wonder I
> > start to
> > >swelter in the RV cockpit by about 3500 MSL when I let down at the
Outer
> > >Banks. It's not just the humidity that's the problem! My cockpit is
> being
> > >fed
> > >warm air when cool is available at other pick-off points.
> > >
> > >Wonder if others have noticed this much extra heating and where else we
> can
> > >cut NACA vents to get away from the unwanted heat. One experiiment I
> have
> > yet
> > >to do is fly with the fuselage/cowling joints taped to stop the leakage
> and
> > >recheck the temps I get.
> > >
> > >-Bill B
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Scott Bilinski
> > Eng dept 305
> > Phone (858) 657-2536
> > Pager (858) 502-5190
Message 41
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: of OAT probes and NACA ducts... |
--> RV-List message posted by: Lenleg@aol.com
I put the probe in one of the wing inspection plates under the right wing.
Small hole drilled with the probe exposed and glued in. Seems to be pretty
accurate.
Len Leggette, RV-8A
Greensboro, NC N910LL
102 hrs Race #87
Message 42
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | MCW Pre-Oshkosh Formation Clinic |
--> RV-List message posted by: Stuart B McCurdy <sturdy@att.net>
We are reposting the info for the Mason City (MCW) Pre-Oshkosh Formation
Clinic 26-28 July to ensure all who would like to attend get the word.
If you know of some who would be interested but may not be on the list,
please pass on to them. So far we have a good group signed up, but
there is room for more.
The plan is to cater to inexperienced on Saturday by flying them with
experienced. Sunday will concentrate on 4-ships with more experienced
and those who have done well on Saturday. On Monday we will work
advanced formations and large formations. Evaluations will be worked in
as recommended. This will also be an Oshkosh practice for the large
formation passes scheduled for Friday, 1 August, during Showcase.
All,
Stuart McCurdy has agreed to hold a Pre-Oshkosh formation clinic at MCW
Clinic. Stu McCurdy of FFI will conduct the clinic with assistance from
other FFI flight leads.
We have a great facility with big wide runways, no tower, limited
traffic and our airport is away from the city with lots of wide-open
space. Just like Oshkosh, Bring your own tiedowns and ropes.
We have a cafe on the field for breakfast and lunch. Our airport is
situated between Mason City, 4 miles east, and Clear Lake 2 miles west.
http://www.airnav.com/airport/KMCW
We have good ramp space plus acres of nice grass for parking and
camping. There are restrooms in the EAA Chapter office and 1 shower
available in my hanger.
The FBO, North Iowa Air Service http://www.ccaero.com/, will give a
$.35 discount for fuel. Today the discounted price would be $2.30
The Headquarters Hotel will be the Best Western Holiday Lodge in Clear
Lake. They have a Bennigans bar and restaurant in the hotel. Several
other hotels are listed below. Rooms are tight act now!. Rooms
blocks are only reserved until July 11th Reservations are on your own!
Call the hotel and make them today!!!!
There will be a social registration fee of $30 per person which
includes a Saturday night BBQ and Iowa Sweet Corn feed at the Hanger and
Sunday evening meal ($20 for one night). We will need RSVP by July 23
to dougr@petroblend.com with "RV Clinic Reservation" in the subject
line. Please do not respond on the RV-List so my email program can sort
it out. Include the names of all attending and whether they are flying
formation or""copilots" This is not a hotel reservation, food and
clinic space only!!!!!
If we discover several spouses are coming we will try to organize some
spouse activities, but at this late date, that will be a shoot from the
hip operation..no promises...
We (or the hotels) will provide transportation to and from all the
hotels listed below. Again, don't look for limo quality service, but we
will get you there. There is Hertz car rental on the field.
There is a lot to do and see in North Iowa, check out the local websites
at:
http://www.masoncityia.com/
http://www.clearlakeiowa.com/
Please understand that this is being organized at the last possible
minute and some things will be fluid.
Thank you for coming to MCW! We look forward to a great event.
Tailwinds,
Doug Rozendaal
Clear Lake Hotels
-------------------
Best Western Holiday Lodge
Jodi Gregory, Manager 138 Rooms =B7 Moderately priced
I-35 & Hwy. 18 (Exit 194)
641-357-5253 or 800-606-3552
Single / Double Rooms $69/ night Ask for RV Formation Clinic
Microtel Inn
Terry Peterson, Manager
48 Rooms =B7 Inexpensively priced
I-35 & Hwy. 18 (Exit 194)
641-357-0966 or 888-771-7171
Email: microtelinn@mchsi.com
Budget Inn Motel
Umesh Patel, Manager
60 Rooms =B7 Inexpensively priced
I-35 & Hwy. 18 (Exit 194)
641-357-8700 or 888-357-8700
Single / Double $59 ask for RV formation clinic
Super 8 Motel
Tim Veach, Manager
60 Rooms =B7 Inexpensively priced
I-35 & B-35 (exit 193)
641-357-7521 or 800-800-8000
Double $53.00 RV Formation Clinic
Mason City Hotels/ Motels
--------------------------
(Please Note: in order for RV Fly-In participants to receive the
rates listed below, attendees will need to inform the reservationist
that they are attending the RV Fly-In. In addition, rates are subject
to state and local taxes totaling 10%.)
Comfort Inn- Hwy. 122 West/Business 18; (641) 423-4444
* Total number of rooms available on July 24: 22
* Total number of rooms available on July 25: 22
* Total number of rooms available on July 26: 22
* Total number of rooms available on July 27: 22
* Single or Double room rate $59.39 (plus tax)
* Handicap Accessible; Indoor Pool Complimentary Continental
Breakfast
Country Inn & Suites - Hwy. 122 West/Business 18; (641) 423-1770
* Total number of rooms available on July 24: 19
* Total number of rooms available on July 25: 17
* Total number of rooms available on July 26: 8
* Total number of rooms available on July 27: 43
* Single or Double room rate $76.00 (plus tax)
* Handicap Accessible; Indoor Pool, Whirlpool, Fitness Center;
Complimentary Continental Breakfast
Days Inn - Hwy. 122 West/Business 18; (641) 424-0210
* Total number of rooms available on July 24: 10
* Total number of rooms available on July 25: 10
* Total number of rooms available on July 26: 4
* Total number of rooms available on July 27: 30
* Single standard room rate $53.90 (plus tax)
* Double standard room rate $65.90 (plus tax)
* Handicap Accessible; Complimentary Continental Breakfast
Hanford Inn - Hwy. 122 West/Business 18; (641) 424-9494
* Total number of rooms available on July 24: 52
* Total number of rooms available on July 25: 34
* Total number of rooms available on July 26: 0
* Total number of rooms available on July 27: 54
* Single or double standard room rate $62.95 (plus tax)
* Handicap Accessible; Indoor Pool, Whirlpool Fitness Center &
Game Area
* Restaurant and Lounge on Property
* Limited shuttle service (shuttle for hotel arrival and hotel
departure only)
Super 8 Motel & Suites- Hwy. 122 West/Business 18; (641) 423-8855
* Total number of rooms available on July 24: 35
* Total number of rooms available on July 25: 35
* Total number of rooms available on July 26: 9
* Total number of rooms available on July 27: 35
* Single standard room/one person rate $53.90 (plus tax)
* Single standard room /two people rate $58.40 (plus tax)
* Double standard room/two people rate $58.40 (plus tax)
* Handicap Accessible; Indoor Pool Complimentary Continental
Breakfast
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Message 43
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RV 4 parts for sale |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil@pressenter.com>
Fellow Listers
I have a friend who has a RV-4 dynafocal motor mount and gear legs, the
short ones, with wood/fiberglas stiffeners, which he will give away to a
good home if anyone has a use for them. Please reply to me off list.
Thanks
Doug Weiler
dougweil@pressenter.com
Message 44
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Tom Webster" <twebste@hotmail.com>
Check out Madison County airport (UYF) just north of London, Ohio.
They are usually the lowest price for 100LL in the Columbus area.
They had 80 octane, but I think it is gone now.
Madison Co. is located about 25 miles west of Columbus about 3 miles south
of Interstate 70.
Tom Webster
RV-7A
>From: "Richard Bibb" <richard.bibb@verizon.net>
>Reply-To: rv-list@matronics.com
>To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
>Subject: RV-List: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop
>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:53:37 -0400
>
>--> RV-List message posted by: "Richard Bibb" <richard.bibb@verizon.net>
>
>Looking for a fuel stop enroute to Oshkosh someplace around Columbus, Ohio.
>Looking fro cheap gas as I won't be flyying the RV this time but a T-6 and
>cheap gas is kinda a necessity.
>
>Any suggesstions?
>
>Richard Bibb
>RV-4 N144KT
>T6-G N3518G
>
>
Message 45
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Fw: Van's Request for Interest in Purchasing Finished Fuel Tanks |
for 7/8/9 Kits
--> RV-List message posted by: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com>
A local RV-7A builder and buddy of mine asked that I forward this along to
the Matronics list. I imagine Van's would sell "QB tanks" like crazy if
they offered them.
Van's would still have to price the tanks close to or less than what Evan
Johnson of Evan Aviation charges: http://www.evansaviationproducts.com/
Pretty sure his price is $975 for both tanks.
)_( Dan
RV-7 N714D
http://www.rvproject.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Linas Danilevicius" <rv7a@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [SoCAL-RVlist] Van's Request for Interest in Purchasing Finished
Fuel Tanks for 7/8/9 Kits
> In the current issue of Van's RVATOR they posed a question to all
builders. They want us to drop them an e-mail letting them know if anyone
would be interested in buying "Finished Fuel Tanks." Since the kits are now
match hole drilled, they feel they can now offer this service if there is
interest. I say with a resounding YES! Anyone interested in this option or
anyone who would have bought them finished had it been available should
respond YES. Based on our input they will make their decision to
manufacture or not. Thanks....Linas
Message 46
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Cimino" <jcimino@echoes.net>
Check Green County (Dayton), I think I paid about 2.40 a gallon there this
weekend.
Jim
James Cimino
RV-8 SN 80039
100+ Hours
570-842-4057
http://www.geocities.com/jcimino.geo/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Webster" <twebste@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Tom Webster" <twebste@hotmail.com>
>
> Check out Madison County airport (UYF) just north of London, Ohio.
> They are usually the lowest price for 100LL in the Columbus area.
> They had 80 octane, but I think it is gone now.
> Madison Co. is located about 25 miles west of Columbus about 3 miles south
> of Interstate 70.
> Tom Webster
> RV-7A
>
>
> >From: "Richard Bibb" <richard.bibb@verizon.net>
> >Reply-To: rv-list@matronics.com
> >To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
> >Subject: RV-List: Ohio Oshkosh Fuel Stop
> >Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:53:37 -0400
> >
> >--> RV-List message posted by: "Richard Bibb" <richard.bibb@verizon.net>
> >
> >Looking for a fuel stop enroute to Oshkosh someplace around Columbus,
Ohio.
> >Looking fro cheap gas as I won't be flyying the RV this time but a T-6
and
> >cheap gas is kinda a necessity.
> >
> >Any suggesstions?
> >
> >Richard Bibb
> >RV-4 N144KT
> >T6-G N3518G
> >
> >
>
>
Message 47
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Cowl Installation |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Jordan Grant" <jgrant@sw.rr.com>
The cowl's only support is from the hinges at the aft end (connection to
the firewall). The forward end is 'free floating'. At least that's the
way the RV-6 works...
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Welch
Subject: RV-List: Cowl Installation
--> RV-List message posted by: "Vincent Welch"
--> <welchvincent@hotmail.com>
Hey Guys, I just started looking at the installation for my RV-8A cowl.
I
don't see anything that supports it at the front end near the prop hub.
Does it just rest on the baffle seal fabric? The plans show the front
of
the cowl being located 1/8" higher than the prop hub, what holds it up
there?
Vince Welch
direct advertising on the Matronics Forums.
Message 48
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: SL-40 vs xcom760 |
--> RV-List message posted by: Leland <Federigo@pacbell.net>
Lucky, I just received my SL40 yesterday. According to the SL40 owners
manual, you may activate just the pilot's mic, just the copilot's mic,
or both from the front panel. You can separately adjust the squelch for
either mic, also from the front panel, and that should take care of
unwanted noise.
You need to install a separate switch to select between the intercom
function and the monitoring of a secondary frequency.
I bought the SL40 because John Stark said that is a higher quality unit
than the xcom 760.
Leland Collins
RV9A wiring
" 2. Both pilot and copilot mics are opened when anyone keys the PTT
circuit.
Almost all modern intercoms activate only the mic of the person speaking
to
eliminate unwanted noise."
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|