RV-List Digest Archive

Mon 03/01/04


Total Messages Posted: 74



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:27 AM - Flyin pics. (Dana Overall)
     2. 04:35 AM - Anybody know the owner of this 6? (Dana Overall)
     3. 05:15 AM - Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (RV8ter@aol.com)
     4. 05:15 AM - VM 1000 & Single Drive Dual Mag (DLN 3000) (Esten Spears)
     5. 05:24 AM - VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge Valve Installation (Esten Spears)
     6. 06:09 AM - Re: Rudder trailing edge - T-88 vs Tank sealant (RV9)
     7. 06:18 AM - Dynon Pitot ()
     8. 06:21 AM - Re: Rudder trailing edge - T-88 vs Tank sealant (linn walters)
     9. 06:26 AM - Re: HVLP systems (linn walters)
    10. 06:40 AM - Re: [rv8list] VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge Valve Installation (Bill VonDane)
    11. 06:48 AM - Re: New "No Fly Zones" and airport vulnerability assessments (RV_8 Pilot)
    12. 07:12 AM - Re: Re: [rv8list] VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge (Scott Bilinski)
    13. 07:23 AM - Re:Dimple or c'sink (Jim Anglin)
    14. 07:40 AM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (LarryRobertHelming)
    15. 07:46 AM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Fiveonepw@aol.com)
    16. 08:06 AM - N8WV Upgrades... (Bill VonDane)
    17. 08:09 AM - Re: A big step (Fiveonepw@aol.com)
    18. 08:12 AM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Sam Buchanan)
    19. 08:14 AM - Cool oil temps cure (Jim Anglin)
    20. 08:28 AM - Re: Anybody know the owner of this 6? ()
    21. 08:36 AM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (lucky macy)
    22. 08:37 AM - Re: Flop tubes in QB wings (Evan and Megan Johnson)
    23. 08:42 AM - GPS question (Jason Sneed)
    24. 08:49 AM - Re: Anybody know the owner of this 6? (Scott Bilinski)
    25. 09:02 AM - Need an GPS antenna... (Bill VonDane)
    26. 09:14 AM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Sam Buchanan)
    27. 09:24 AM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (RV8ter@aol.com)
    28. 09:32 AM - Re: Anybody know the owner of this 6? (Dana Overall)
    29. 09:36 AM - Re: Dimple or countersink 904/976/922 (Matthew Brandes)
    30. 09:55 AM - RV-List New VANS AD/Service Bulletin Notice posted on website (P M Condon)
    31. 10:01 AM - >Re:Cool oil temps cure (Oldsfolks@aol.com)
    32. 10:13 AM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (linn walters)
    33. 10:16 AM - Re: Cool oil temps cure (Jim Jewell)
    34. 11:31 AM - Re: Cool oil temps cure (Stein Bruch)
    35. 11:46 AM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Sam Buchanan)
    36. 11:56 AM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Stein Bruch)
    37. 12:12 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (lucky macy)
    38. 12:12 PM - Re: Cool oil temps cure (John D. Heath)
    39. 12:39 PM - Re: HVLP systems (Fly2eat@aol.com)
    40. 12:44 PM - Re: HVLP systems (David Carter)
    41. 12:48 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Fly2eat@aol.com)
    42. 12:59 PM - Dynon Pitot (Wheeler North)
    43. 01:11 PM - Re: Flyin Leftovers, need a little help. (Doug Weiler)
    44. 01:56 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (linn walters)
    45. 02:20 PM - More in FlowScan installation... (Bill VonDane)
    46. 03:03 PM - Fly-in info. (BRUCE GRAY)
    47. 03:03 PM - Re: HVLP systems (Michael D Hilger)
    48. 03:15 PM - Re: More in FlowScan installation... (Jason Sneed)
    49. 03:16 PM - Tach drive (Bob Hodgson)
    50. 03:50 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Ed Holyoke)
    51. 04:27 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (LarryRobertHelming)
    52. 04:52 PM - Re: More in FlowScan installation... (Alex Peterson)
    53. 05:25 PM - which oil cooler for the angle valve 200hp engine? (lucky macy)
    54. 05:33 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Dave Bristol)
    55. 05:34 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Fiveonepw@aol.com)
    56. 05:47 PM - Re: More in FlowScan installation... (Doug Weiler)
    57. 06:07 PM - Re: More in FlowScan installation... (Larry Bowen)
    58. 06:12 PM - Re: Cool oil temps cure (Dean Pichon)
    59. 06:31 PM - Breather tube tank... (Travis Hamblen)
    60. 06:34 PM - Re: Dynon Pitot (kempthornes)
    61. 06:40 PM - Re: Dynon Pitot (Leesafur@aol.com)
    62. 07:03 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Phil Sisson, Litchfield Aerobatic Club)
    63. 07:05 PM - wing hole size for Van's conduit (Will & Lynda Allen)
    64. 07:16 PM - Re: which oil cooler for the angle valve 200hp engine? (Eustace Bowhay)
    65. 07:21 PM - Orndorff RV-8 Wing Videos for sale (Terri Watson)
    66. 07:37 PM - Re: Dynon Pitot (Douglas A. Fischer)
    67. 08:04 PM - Re: Dynon Pitot (Leesafur@aol.com)
    68. 08:19 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (Sam Buchanan)
    69. 08:29 PM - Builders Manual + 21 years of the RV-ator (Joe Proctor)
    70. 09:09 PM - Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach (linn walters)
    71. 09:10 PM - i39 pictures (Jason Sneed)
    72. 10:42 PM - Weight/balance program (David Aronson)
    73. 10:44 PM - Re: VM 1000 & Single Drive Dual Mag (DLN 3000) (David Aronson)
    74. 11:48 PM - Re: Weight/balance program (Jeff Point)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:27:49 AM PST US
    From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Flyin pics.
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com> OK, here is the last of it:-) I talked with Doug Reeves via phone last night and this just posted on the front page of vansairforce.net. On Doug's site are also some links for video and additional photo sites. Have fun. WOW, what can I say? 86+ RVs and over 107 total aircraft. http://members16.clubphoto.com/rick742624/guest.phtml Big thanks to Rick Schwandt for the pictures. What started out as an informal UFO (Ultimate Fly Out) by the Ohio Valley RVators to my shop, turned into a great kickoff for this years fly-in season. As most on the RV lists are aware, I moved the event from my shop to the airport two weeks prior to the event. At that time, I made some phone calls to round up door prizes. The weather forecast for the entire east coast promised beautiful weather, this time we were not disappointed. The first arrival was from the Michigan, Indiana border and was at 7:40AM. By this time the local EAA chapter had coffee and free donuts. Shortly thereafter, the pattern was full of RVs coming from all directions. It was a continuous dialogue of flight of four inbound with traffic in sight, flight of two following flight of two. Give credit to the pilots, at not time did I ever witness anything remotely compromising. I took care of parking RVs on the ramp until it filled. The ramp was double stacked, leaving taxi space between rows. My youngest son and a friend took care of directing arrivals on the taxiway where pilots were allowed to park there own airplanes as they wished. The taxiway is nearly 1500 long. We had RVs and certified, parked wingtip to wingtip nearly to the end of the taxiway. By the way, we tried to only allow RVs onto the ramp. Reserve parking was saved for TeamRV and the Ohio Valley RVators as they promised to put on three different formation flights. TeamRV, led by Mike Stewart arrived from Atlanta with a flight of 9, as did Ohio Valley, led by Rick Gray. Ohio Valley had either 17 or 18 arrivals. Indy Wing topped the list with 20 RVs which included 2 fire breathing Super 8s. 12 represented the TN VALLEY BUILDER GROUP; the Palmetto Wing had 3 along with 3 from SERV. I believe the group from Pontiac, MI made it in along with a two from Florida, west from MO and from north east of DC. At noon I took a little break and started counting airplanes. A couple RVs had already left by then so I added them to the count. At noon we had 86 RVs and 107 total aircraft for the fly-in. More RVs arrived after noon but I did not try and keep count, as I was busy with lunch, formation flying and the door prizes. I also squeezed in a little shopping time walking and looking at RVs. After a lunch of hamburgers, hotdogs and free Hooters wings TeamRV, as a flight 5 and Ohio Valley, as a flight of 4 put on individual formation flight demonstrations, which would make the most harden envious. Icing on the cake came form a final 8 ship formation showcase as a joint formation flight demonstration made up of both teams. A reporter and photographer went up with TeamRV. Stunning photographs now grace the front page of the local Sunday paper. http://www.richmondregister.com/articles/2004/02/29/news/news01.txt Door prizes were given out from the following supporters: Control Vision AnyWhere Map, EZ Pilot Auto Pilot, engalt.com/aviation.htm fabulous post light system, Experimentalair.com CAD designed and water jet cut instrument panel, Kitlog Pro, Grand Rapids, Trutrack autopilot discounts from aircraftextras.com, Avery and Cleaveland. Thanks to all who attended and yes, same time next year!! Dana Overall Richmond, KY i39 RV-7 slider, Imron black, "Black Magic" Finish kit 13B Rotary. Hangar flying my Dynon. http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero1.jpg http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero3.jpg http://rvflying.tripod.com/blackrudder.jpg do not archive Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee when you click here.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:35:44 AM PST US
    From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Anybody know the owner of this 6?
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com> http://www.infra-read.com/pics/small/DCP_0826.JPG I'd like to find his name and email offlist. Want to talk to him about his panel. Dana Overall Richmond, KY i39 RV-7 slider, Imron black, "Black Magic" Finish kit 13B Rotary. Hangar flying my Dynon. http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero1.jpg http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero3.jpg http://rvflying.tripod.com/blackrudder.jpg do not archive


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:15:18 AM PST US
    From: RV8ter@aol.com
    Subject: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: RV8ter@aol.com OK, I've bought Bob's most recent workbook but don't have quality time to go through it all in a time frame to keep the info coherent. Can someone give me the reader's digest version of the differences between just going with Van's electrical design and drawing's and wiring kit and switches vs whatever alternatives Bob's discussing (if anything). Thanks, lucky


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:15:18 AM PST US
    From: "Esten Spears" <ewspears@comcast.net>
    <rv-list@matronics.com>
    Subject: VM 1000 & Single Drive Dual Mag (DLN 3000)
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Esten Spears" <ewspears@comcast.net> Has anyone installed a VM 1000 Engine Monitor with a Single Drive Dual Mag? If So; What Tach Sensor did you use and where and how did you mount it?????? The instructions call for it to be placed in the gear inspection port where it picks up the passing gear teeth. The single drive dual mag has such ports but it uses nylon gears so I don't think the sensor would see anything. Any help would be appreciated! Esten Spears, RV8A, 80922, N922ES (reserved), Leeward Air Ranch, Ocala, FL


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:24:41 AM PST US
    From: "Esten Spears" <ewspears@comcast.net>
    <rv-list@matronics.com>
    Subject: VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge Valve Installation
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Esten Spears" <ewspears@comcast.net> Has anyone done an IO 360 200HP with a VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge Valve Installation??? If so; where and how did you place the purge valve and flowmeter????? I am using standard Bendix Servo and Spider. Any help would be appreciated!! Esten Spears, RV8A, 80922, N922ES (reserved), Leeward Air Ranch, Ocala, FL


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:09:48 AM PST US
    From: RV9 <rv9@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: Rudder trailing edge - T-88 vs Tank sealant
    --> RV-List message posted by: RV9 <rv9@charter.net> I've used T-88 on all my trailing edges and have been very pleased with the results. I drill the trailing edges to a scrap piece of aluminum angle and then let the T-88 set while clecoed to the angle. It's important to rotate and clean the clecoes periodically during the curing if you ever want to get them out :). That's probably the only disadvantage compared to tank sealant which never really hardens completely. When fully cured you don't really even need the rivets. Before somebody takes me seriously, I'm just kidding. Be sure to set the rivets. You can use white vinegar to clean up the excess T-88 before it hardens or on the tips of the clecoes. You need much more powerful solvents (Acetone, MEK) to deal with the tank sealant. Luckily after the flaps and ailerons, I've got no more of those trailing edges to do. Steve Mottin RV-9A (Fuselage - bulkheads) N609RV (Reserved) Granbury, Texas Sunday, February 29, 2004, 11:13:12 PM, you wrote: -->> RV-List message posted by: "Dave Ghost" <daveghost@earthlink.net> DG> Im considering using T-88 structural epoxy on the rudder trailing edge DG> instead of tank sealant, but first I thought Id check with those more DG> experienced than I in the use of these materials. I havent used either yet. DG> Are there any compelling reasons to use tank sealant rather than this epoxy DG> or is the epoxy a better way to go? I have the epoxy on hand, but would DG> gladly order the small container of tank sealant if it will perform better DG> on the trailing edge. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. DG> Thank you, DG> Dave, RV-7 Empennage


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:18:29 AM PST US
    Subject: Dynon Pitot
    From: <EricHe@FlexSolPackaging.com>
    --> RV-List message posted by: <EricHe@FlexSolPackaging.com> I'm getting ready to order my Dynon, I specifically asked them this last week. Their reply was, a pitot is a pitot. They also said it was built to fit the standard (Gretz) mount. Can't answer anything about AOA, LRI, functions. Don't know, Don't care. >Unfortunately, the Dynon website says the pitot will only work with their >EFIS-D10. It sounds like if you want their pitot for anything else you're >out of luck. Anybody know for certain? > >Doug Fischer >RV-9A 90706 Wings


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:21:54 AM PST US
    From: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Rudder trailing edge - T-88 vs Tank sealant
    --> RV-List message posted by: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com> Dave Ghost wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: "Dave Ghost" <daveghost@earthlink.net> > >Im considering using T-88 structural epoxy on the rudder trailing edge >instead of tank sealant, but first I thought Id check with those more >experienced than I in the use of these materials. I havent used either yet. >Are there any compelling reasons to use tank sealant rather than this epoxy >or is the epoxy a better way to go? I have the epoxy on hand, but would >gladly order the small container of tank sealant if it will perform better >on the trailing edge. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. > > >Thank you, > >Dave, RV-7 Empennage > Having used both )but not on an RV yet) I say get the sealant. the T-88 is formulated for wood, and is what holds my Pitts wings together. It won't work well on aluminum as it'll pull loose after a while. the tank sealant will grip like a monkey if the aluminum is clean. 'Course that monkey might affect your W&B though!!! :-D Linn do not archive


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:26:58 AM PST US
    From: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: HVLP systems
    --> RV-List message posted by: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com> Brian Duncan wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: "Brian Duncan" <brian2207@comcast.net> > > >Does anyone have experience with HVLP setups? Any brands to look for or >avoid? I'm looking at 3 or 4 stage turbine for priming and maybe finish. I'm >also need to do some re-finishing around the house. Any experiences would be >appreciated. Thanks. > >Brian > I borrow a 2-stage HVLP gun and I love the way it sprays. Much more paint on the item and less on the floor. At the price of good paint, that's a great plus!!! The only drawback, and sone I dom't know how to solve is the hose. It's fat and fairly heavy and with a gun full of paint my arm gets tired of holding it up. And that's really the only drawback. Another good 'plus' is that the turbine gets hot and the air is used to cool it ...... giving you warmer air to paint with instead of colder air from a standard spray gun. I'm not a professional painter so I can't comment on the quality of the paint job!!! Linn


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:40:23 AM PST US
    From: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com>
    Subject: Re: [rv8list] VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge Valve Installation
    vansairforce <vansairforce@yahoogroups.com> --> RV-List message posted by: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com> Esten.... I don't know about the purge valve, but I installed the flow meter on my -8A this weekend: http://www.vondane.com/rv8a/finish/finish13.htm -Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Esten Spears" <ewspears@comcast.net> <rv-list@matronics.com> Subject: [rv8list] VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge Valve Installation Has anyone done an IO 360 200HP with a VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge Valve Installation??? If so; where and how did you place the purge valve and flowmeter????? I am using standard Bendix Servo and Spider. Any help would be appreciated!! Esten Spears, RV8A, 80922, N922ES (reserved), Leeward Air Ranch, Ocala, FL [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Information exchange for builders of Vans Aircraft RV-8 kits. IF YOU WISH TO UNSUBSCRIBE, PLEASE SEND AN EMAIL TO : rv8list-unsubscribe@egroups.com <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rv8list/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: rv8list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:48:49 AM PST US
    From: "RV_8 Pilot" <rv_8pilot@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: New "No Fly Zones" and airport vulnerability assessments
    --> RV-List message posted by: "RV_8 Pilot" <rv_8pilot@hotmail.com> How about we, as a generally very affluent and intelligent group of people quit arguing over who's more moderate or independent or cerebral and what group is or isn't hurting GA and think of ways to fight these idiots. They will take away every freedom we have to secure their own personal power/financial agenda. They're soulless and not above cheating the system/breaking the law to win more power. And if they think writing ANOTHER stupid law to control us fossil fuel burning, "rich" pilots appeals to their pathetic disfunctional base, they'll do it. How about we brainstorm ways to fight these socialist, power mongers and keep the freedom that is rightfully ours and NOT theirs to take?! Idea 1 - Join AOPA. Idea 2 - Write your reps using brief and concise statements. Ref the bills being proposed. Idea 3 - Call your reps with above info. Idea 4 - Don't even waste the time calling these few reps unless you're a constituent. Then let them have it. Idea 5 - Reall do the things you say you will! And maybe twice! Bryan Jones -8 www.LoneStarSquadron.com Houston, Texas >When a party is out of power they introduce all sorts of feel good bills to >use in their campaign. >Or they spend a year and a half tying up the government trying to find out >whose spunk was on the dress. > >I agree with Charlie. It doesn't matter which party we're talking about >here, they all have their issues, and you should follow the money always. >If I >could keep the new Republicans out of the bedroom, out of my beliefs and >out of >my wallet, I could be persuaded that there was a difference between them >and >the Dems. Take off on a romantic weekend or a family adventure to these great U.S.


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:12:59 AM PST US
    From: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com> Valve Installation
    Subject: Re: [rv8list] VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge
    Valve Installation --> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com> Valve Installation On my AFP system I have the flow meter, purge valve and then the spider. My purge valve is mounted on the spider, and the flow meter is hard mounted on the engine mount. Remember you need 5~6 inches of straight hose leading into the flow meter. At 07:40 AM 3/1/04 -0700, you wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com> > >Esten.... > >I don't know about the purge valve, but I installed the flow meter on my -8A >this weekend: > >http://www.vondane.com/rv8a/finish/finish13.htm > >-Bill > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Esten Spears" <ewspears@comcast.net> >To: <rv8-list@matronics.com>; <rv8list@yahoogroups.com>; ><rv-list@matronics.com> >Subject: [rv8list] VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge Valve Installation > > > Has anyone done an IO 360 200HP with a VM 1000 Fuel Flowmeter & Purge >Valve Installation??? >If so; where and how did you place the purge valve and flowmeter????? I am >using standard Bendix Servo and Spider. >Any help would be appreciated!! >Esten Spears, RV8A, 80922, N922ES (reserved), Leeward Air Ranch, Ocala, FL > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >Information exchange for builders of Vans Aircraft RV-8 kits. > >IF YOU WISH TO UNSUBSCRIBE, PLEASE SEND AN EMAIL TO : > >rv8list-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > ><*> To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rv8list/ > ><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > rv8list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > Scott Bilinski Eng dept 305 Phone (858) 657-2536 Pager (858) 502-5190 do not archive


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:23:20 AM PST US
    From: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re:Dimple or c'sink
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net> I have dimpled skins up to .040 with good results on 2 RV's (sorta - RV6 and HR II). Otherwise .032 is the breaking point for c'sinking. v dimpling. Dimple the top pc. and c'sink the pile below. C'sink just enough to get a rivet to lay flush - otherwise you stand a chance of pulling the skin into a crater. Jim


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:40:52 AM PST US
    From: "LarryRobertHelming" <lhelming@sigecom.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: "LarryRobertHelming" <lhelming@sigecom.net> I am in the thick of wiring now so I have a somewhat experienced opinion on this subject. I studied Bob's book and drawings and felt I understood about 55-65% of it before I received the Vans wiring kit. I was amazed how different the two approaches are in their use of materials. Particularly in the use of circuit breakers compared to fuses. And Vans rolls his own power buss using copper strips and Bob advocates using the Buss power buses. I am using a lot of the material that Vans supplies but have worked in the LR3 voltage regulator from Bob / B&C. After spending some time to understand Bob and his drawings, I found it impossible for me to go with the Vans approach. I reference the Vans wiring approach to get suggested wiring routing and I try to use the wire his kit supplies. But I think Bob's slip-on terminal ends are easier to work with than the screw on terminals from Van's. I am sure there will be mixed opinions and if I had studied Vans approach first, I probably would feel uncomfortable with Bob's. Best wishes. Indiana Larry, RV7 Tip-up TMX-O-360 ACS2002 Dynon CNS430 Digitrak Jeff Rose Firewall Forward ----- Original Message ----- From: <RV8ter@aol.com> Subject: RV-List: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach > --> RV-List message posted by: RV8ter@aol.com > > OK, I've bought Bob's most recent workbook but don't have quality time to go through it all in a time frame to keep the info coherent. > > Can someone give me the reader's digest version of the differences between just going with Van's electrical design and drawing's and wiring kit and switches vs whatever alternatives Bob's discussing (if anything). > > Thanks, > lucky > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:46:16 AM PST US
    From: Fiveonepw@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: Fiveonepw@aol.com In a message dated 3/1/04 7:16:35 AM Central Standard Time, RV8ter@aol.com writes: > Can someone give me the reader's digest version of the differences between > just going with Van's electrical design and drawing's and wiring kit and > switches vs whatever alternatives Bob's discussing (if anything). > Lucky- I didn't try Vans approach and aren't even familiar with it. After absorbing about 2 months worth of Bob Nuckolls wit, wisdom and how-tos, I didn't even bother with an alternative and converted to Aeroelectricism. Subscribe to the Aeroelectric list, study the book, do like it says, ask questions if you don't understand anything, do your design and installation, and you will not have to worry about your electrics. If I can do it, anybody can! From The PossumWorks in TN Mark - all electric RV-6A, 42 hours and my cheeks are KILLING me! 8-)


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:06:33 AM PST US
    From: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com>
    Subject: N8WV Upgrades...
    "rv8list@yahoogroups.com" <104001c3ff9b$16c13380$51e25f0a@vondane> --> RV-List message posted by: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com> I decided to do some upgrades to my -8A, and have a new page on my site that I will be posting the details to if anyone is interested... http://www.vondane.com/rv8a/finish/finish13.htm -Bill VonDane EAA Tech Counselor RV-8A ~ N8WV ~ Colorado Springs www.vondane.com www.creativair.com www.epanelbuilder.com


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:09:24 AM PST US
    From: Fiveonepw@aol.com
    Subject: Re: A big step
    --> RV-List message posted by: Fiveonepw@aol.com In a message dated 2/29/04 9:04:00 PM Central Standard Time, bifft@xmission.com writes: > Otherwise, very pleased. Since there was nothing left to do back there, > took the tail back off so I wouldn't have to duck under it to walk around > the garage. Baloney- you'll find LOTS more to do back there! 8-) Congratulations! Mark - do not archive


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:12:11 AM PST US
    From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net> RV8ter@aol.com wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: RV8ter@aol.com > > OK, I've bought Bob's most recent workbook but don't have quality > time to go through it all in a time frame to keep the info coherent. > > Can someone give me the reader's digest version of the differences > between just going with Van's electrical design and drawing's and > wiring kit and switches vs whatever alternatives Bob's discussing (if > anything). > > Thanks, lucky Lucky, This is an interesting and valid question and the answer is one that you probably will not like. I think it is safe to say that for most of us with minimal or normal amounts of electrical background, a serious amount of study will be required to understand the why's and how's of 'Lectric Bob's dual bus architecture. I read portions of the book two and three times before I finally got a good understanding of exactly why he designed his system the way he did. If you try to implement the dual bus system without understanding the reasons for it, it will make absolutely no sense and you will have no idea how to properly use it or troubleshoot. In other words, there is no way to avoid serious study time. However, once the system is understood, the traditional (Vans) method will appear to be very dated and obsolete, and more than likely you will be a dual bus convert! Here are some of the basic tenets of Bob's system: 1) Elimination of single point failure scenarios. This is the biggie. The horror stories we all have heard about "electrical failure" in aircraft can be designed out of the system, and Bob has done so. His system assures that regardless of what happens to the electrical system, there is a work-around (usually just flipping one switch) that will allow the flight to have a happy conclusion. 2) Elimination of expensive (and unnecessary) breakers. Bob's system is based on readily available and reliable automotive blade fuses. The rationale is that there is very little troubleshooting that can be done in-flight with breakers, and with the proper design, an electrical system can't be shot down with one or two circuit failures. Land and do the trouble shooting on the ground. 3) Very reasonable cost due to the above use of automotive technology and elimination of "aircraft" stuff. :-) 4) Absolute protection from over-voltage scenarios. The traditional system of aircraft wiring does not provide for any of the above advantages. I find it interesting that the new state-of-the-art aircraft (Cirrus and the glass cockpit Cessnas) have dual bus systems similar to Bob's design. As I mentioned before, if a builder refuses to take the time to study the dual bus architecture, they might as well go with the Vans cookbook (and its inherent flaws) because Bob's system will be Greek to them. We are fortunate to have choices so we can use whichever system we are most comfortable with. Sam Buchanan (RV-6, 5502 hrs, 'Lectric Bob's system throughout, no blown fuses or scary electrical moments) http://thervjournal.com


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:14:54 AM PST US
    From: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Cool oil temps cure
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net> My -4 won't get the oil temps above 150 even with a plate blocking off the inlet. Someone told me there was an oil control valve that could be installed to manually regulate the flow of oil to the cooler. I know this could be potentially dangerous but notwithstanding that does anyone know if this info is bogus and if not who would sell these valves? Jim


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:28:36 AM PST US
    From: <benandginny@insightbb.com>
    Subject: Re: Anybody know the owner of this 6?
    --> RV-List message posted by: <benandginny@insightbb.com> Dana, Wish I could have attended last weekend. I don't know the 6 owner but ... Carbon Fiber "like" panels available from http://www.aeroenhancements.com/custom_finishes.htm Ben Cunningham RV7 Finish Kit in transit Louisville, KY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com> Subject: RV-List: Anybody know the owner of this 6? > --> RV-List message posted by: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com> > > > http://www.infra-read.com/pics/small/DCP_0826.JPG > > I'd like to find his name and email offlist. Want to talk to him about his > panel. > > > Dana Overall > Richmond, KY i39 > RV-7 slider, Imron black, "Black Magic" > Finish kit > 13B Rotary. Hangar flying my Dynon. > http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero1.jpg > http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero3.jpg > http://rvflying.tripod.com/blackrudder.jpg > do not archive > >


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:36:20 AM PST US
    From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com> Thanks a bunch Sam, I keep hearing a common theme - avoids expensive breaker switches and somehow get the impression it's a cheaper but not necessarily quicker or lighter solution. Is one systems totoal cost actually significantly different than the other, lighter than the other and easier to maintain once built? It's tough to ignore any system Van's does as overall if they decide to do something it's usually hard to top and usually makes good customer sense. I'm just doing day/night vfr so worries about being down at IFR mins with an all electric panel that suddenly goes black doesn't resonate with me. I guess that is to say, I've never had a CB switch complaint yet but agree their pricey. But if the big price difference between the two designs is just with the cost between the 2 switch/fuse/breaker types used, I could justify the higher expense of Van's design with lower building time on my part to understand, find the parts to order, etc. Again, though, thanks for the info. lucky ----Original Message Follows---- From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net> Subject: Re: RV-List: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach --> RV-List message posted by: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net> RV8ter@aol.com wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: RV8ter@aol.com > > OK, I've bought Bob's most recent workbook but don't have quality > time to go through it all in a time frame to keep the info coherent. > > Can someone give me the reader's digest version of the differences > between just going with Van's electrical design and drawing's and > wiring kit and switches vs whatever alternatives Bob's discussing (if > anything). > > Thanks, lucky Lucky, This is an interesting and valid question and the answer is one that you probably will not like. I think it is safe to say that for most of us with minimal or normal amounts of electrical background, a serious amount of study will be required to understand the why's and how's of 'Lectric Bob's dual bus architecture. I read portions of the book two and three times before I finally got a good understanding of exactly why he designed his system the way he did. If you try to implement the dual bus system without understanding the reasons for it, it will make absolutely no sense and you will have no idea how to properly use it or troubleshoot. In other words, there is no way to avoid serious study time. However, once the system is understood, the traditional (Vans) method will appear to be very dated and obsolete, and more than likely you will be a dual bus convert! Here are some of the basic tenets of Bob's system: 1) Elimination of single point failure scenarios. This is the biggie. The horror stories we all have heard about "electrical failure" in aircraft can be designed out of the system, and Bob has done so. His system assures that regardless of what happens to the electrical system, there is a work-around (usually just flipping one switch) that will allow the flight to have a happy conclusion. 2) Elimination of expensive (and unnecessary) breakers. Bob's system is based on readily available and reliable automotive blade fuses. The rationale is that there is very little troubleshooting that can be done in-flight with breakers, and with the proper design, an electrical system can't be shot down with one or two circuit failures. Land and do the trouble shooting on the ground. 3) Very reasonable cost due to the above use of automotive technology and elimination of "aircraft" stuff. :-) 4) Absolute protection from over-voltage scenarios. The traditional system of aircraft wiring does not provide for any of the above advantages. I find it interesting that the new state-of-the-art aircraft (Cirrus and the glass cockpit Cessnas) have dual bus systems similar to Bob's design. As I mentioned before, if a builder refuses to take the time to study the dual bus architecture, they might as well go with the Vans cookbook (and its inherent flaws) because Bob's system will be Greek to them. We are fortunate to have choices so we can use whichever system we are most comfortable with. Sam Buchanan (RV-6, 5502 hrs, 'Lectric Bob's system throughout, no blown fuses or scary electrical moments) http://thervjournal.com Watch high-quality video with fast playback at MSN Video. Free!


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:37:57 AM PST US
    From: "Evan and Megan Johnson" <evmeg@snowcrest.net>
    Subject: Re: Flop tubes in QB wings
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Evan and Megan Johnson" <evmeg@snowcrest.net> Hi Mickey....I have done it several times. It takes alot of patience but it can be done. You have to use pop rivets for everything and you will scrape up your wrists trying to pop them inside the first bay. You also have to move the sending unit mounting hole to the back baffle in the second bay...kind of a trick to get the nutplates in place through that little hole but again, with patience it can be done. You will also have to be very careful about aluminum chips, you WILL have lots of them in the tank when you are done.....rinse, rinse, rinse. Just use a gallon of avgas and pour it throgh a coffee filter a few times untill you dont see any sparkles. Feel free to contact me if you wish....I am happy to help if I can. Evan (530)247-0375 (530)351-1776 cell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mickey Coggins" <mick-matronics@rv8.ch> Subject: RV-List: Flop tubes in QB wings > --> RV-List message posted by: Mickey Coggins <mick-matronics@rv8.ch> > > Does anyone see a way to get a flop tube to work > in a QB wing? > > At first I just thought it was a quick retrofit, but > there seem to be some protective brackets needed inside > to keep the flop tubes from getting hung up in there. > > Has anyone been able to make this work? > > Thanks, > Mickey > > -- > Mickey Coggins > http://www.rv8.ch/ > #82007 QB Wings/Fuselage > >


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:42:19 AM PST US
    From: Jason Sneed <n242ds@cox.net>
    Subject: GPS question
    --> RV-List message posted by: Jason Sneed <n242ds@cox.net> Can someone tell me if it is possible to run 2 gps units off one antenna? If so where would I find some type of Y adapter? Thanks, Jason Sneed Commercial Lending Officer First National Bank and Trust N242DS Great flyin this weekend at I39!


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:49:05 AM PST US
    From: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
    Subject: Re: Anybody know the owner of this 6?
    --> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com> If you can just get the N number and look it up. I could not make it out. At 11:27 AM 3/1/04 -0500, you wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: <benandginny@insightbb.com> > >Dana, >Wish I could have attended last weekend. I don't know the 6 owner but ... >Carbon Fiber "like" panels available from >http://www.aeroenhancements.com/custom_finishes.htm > >Ben Cunningham >RV7 Finish Kit in transit >Louisville, KY > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com> >To: <rv-list@matronics.com> >Subject: RV-List: Anybody know the owner of this 6? > > >> --> RV-List message posted by: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com> >> >> >> http://www.infra-read.com/pics/small/DCP_0826.JPG >> >> I'd like to find his name and email offlist. Want to talk to him about >his >> panel. >> >> >> Dana Overall >> Richmond, KY i39 >> RV-7 slider, Imron black, "Black Magic" >> Finish kit >> 13B Rotary. Hangar flying my Dynon. >> http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero1.jpg >> http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero3.jpg >> http://rvflying.tripod.com/blackrudder.jpg >> do not archive >> >> > > Scott Bilinski Eng dept 305 Phone (858) 657-2536 Pager (858) 502-5190 do not archive


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:02:17 AM PST US
    From: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com>
    Subject: Need an GPS antenna...
    vansairforce <vansairforce@yahoogroups.com> --> RV-List message posted by: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com> If any one of you fine folks out there have one of those little black Garmin hockey puck GPS antennas that you're not going to be using, I sure could use one... Here's a photo of what I an looking for: http://www.vondane.com/rv8a/gpsa.jpg Thanks! -Bill VonDane EAA Tech Counselor RV-8A ~ N8WV ~ Colorado Springs www.vondane.com www.creativair.com www.epanelbuilder.com


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:14:40 AM PST US
    From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net> lucky macy wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com> > > Thanks a bunch Sam, > I keep hearing a common theme - avoids expensive breaker switches and > somehow get the impression it's a cheaper but not necessarily quicker or > lighter solution. I think it would be both less expensive and lighter, but since I can't compare both systems side-by-side, I don't have hard numbers. The Fast-On terminals used in Bob's system are *definitely* easier and quicker to install than fumbling with tiny washers and screws! Get the proper crimper, and a Fast-On can be installed and in place in a matter of seconds. The fuse panels weigh nearly nothing; the weight comparison between good quality switches and switchable breakers is probably a wash. If you have separate breakers and switches, Bob's system would certainly be lighter and simpler. > > Is one systems totoal cost actually significantly different than the other, > lighter than the other and easier to maintain once built? A good electrical system has no maintainance! :-) > > It's tough to ignore any system Van's does as overall if they decide to do > something it's usually hard to top and usually makes good customer sense. I think it is a matter of inertia; Vans offers what is traditional (kinda like their aircraft....) and what the folks at Vans are familiar with. > > I'm just doing day/night vfr so worries about being down at IFR mins with an > all electric panel that suddenly goes black doesn't resonate with me. But suddenly being in the dark on a VFR night can be exciting! And, Bob's system means you don't have to worry about a runaway alternator or a failed master contactor. And....its sorta cool knowing your electrical system is more advanced than most certificated light planes. :-) Sam ================== I > guess that is to say, I've never had a CB switch complaint yet but agree > their pricey. But if the big price difference between the two designs is > just with the cost between the 2 switch/fuse/breaker types used, I could > justify the higher expense of Van's design with lower building time on my > part to understand, find the parts to order, etc. > > Again, though, thanks for the info. > > lucky > > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net> > To: rv-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach > Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:12:01 -0600 > > --> RV-List message posted by: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net> > > RV8ter@aol.com wrote: > > --> RV-List message posted by: RV8ter@aol.com > > > > OK, I've bought Bob's most recent workbook but don't have quality > > time to go through it all in a time frame to keep the info coherent. > > > > Can someone give me the reader's digest version of the differences > > between just going with Van's electrical design and drawing's and > > wiring kit and switches vs whatever alternatives Bob's discussing (if > > anything). > > > > Thanks, lucky > > Lucky, > > This is an interesting and valid question and the answer is one that you > probably will not like. I think it is safe to say that for most of us > with minimal or normal amounts of electrical background, a serious > amount of study will be required to understand the why's and how's of > 'Lectric Bob's dual bus architecture. I read portions of the book two > and three times before I finally got a good understanding of exactly why > he designed his system the way he did. If you try to implement the dual > bus system without understanding the reasons for it, it will make > absolutely no sense and you will have no idea how to properly use it or > troubleshoot. > > In other words, there is no way to avoid serious study time. However, > once the system is understood, the traditional (Vans) method will appear > to be very dated and obsolete, and more than likely you will be a dual > bus convert! > > Here are some of the basic tenets of Bob's system: > > 1) Elimination of single point failure scenarios. This is the biggie. > The horror stories we all have heard about "electrical failure" in > aircraft can be designed out of the system, and Bob has done so. His > system assures that regardless of what happens to the electrical system, > there is a work-around (usually just flipping one switch) that will > allow the flight to have a happy conclusion. > > 2) Elimination of expensive (and unnecessary) breakers. Bob's system is > based on readily available and reliable automotive blade fuses. The > rationale is that there is very little troubleshooting that can be done > in-flight with breakers, and with the proper design, an electrical > system can't be shot down with one or two circuit failures. Land and do > the trouble shooting on the ground. > > 3) Very reasonable cost due to the above use of automotive technology > and elimination of "aircraft" stuff. :-) > > 4) Absolute protection from over-voltage scenarios. > > The traditional system of aircraft wiring does not provide for any of > the above advantages. I find it interesting that the new > state-of-the-art aircraft (Cirrus and the glass cockpit Cessnas) have > dual bus systems similar to Bob's design. > > As I mentioned before, if a builder refuses to take the time to study > the dual bus architecture, they might as well go with the Vans cookbook > (and its inherent flaws) because Bob's system will be Greek to them. We > are fortunate to have choices so we can use whichever system we are most > comfortable with. > > Sam Buchanan (RV-6, 5502 hrs, 'Lectric Bob's system throughout, no blown > fuses or scary electrical moments) > http://thervjournal.com


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:24:53 AM PST US
    From: RV8ter@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: RV8ter@aol.com Ah, something concrete. This can't be prevented with Van's setup - maybe with slight modification? In a message dated 3/1/2004 12:16:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, sbuc@hiwaay.net writes: But suddenly being in the dark on a VFR night can be exciting! And, Bob's system means you don't have to worry about a runaway alternator or a failed master contactor.


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:32:35 AM PST US
    From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Anybody know the owner of this 6?
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com> Somebody does a "dip" with your cut panel and the finish, which floats on top of the whatever, bonds itself to the panel. Anybody got a clue? I talked with the guy at SNF last year but that's about it. The panel in this 6 was done the same way. Dana Overall Richmond, KY i39 RV-7 slider, Imron black, "Black Magic" Finish kit 13B Rotary. Hangar flying my Dynon. http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero1.jpg http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero3.jpg http://rvflying.tripod.com/blackrudder.jpg do not archive >From: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com> >Reply-To: rv-list@matronics.com >To: rv-list@matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: Anybody know the owner of this 6? >Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:48:53 -0800 > >--> RV-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski ><bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com> > >If you can just get the N number and look it up. I could not make it out. > > >At 11:27 AM 3/1/04 -0500, you wrote: > >--> RV-List message posted by: <benandginny@insightbb.com> > > > >Dana, > >Wish I could have attended last weekend. I don't know the 6 owner but ... > >Carbon Fiber "like" panels available from > >http://www.aeroenhancements.com/custom_finishes.htm > > > >Ben Cunningham > >RV7 Finish Kit in transit > >Louisville, KY > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com> > >To: <rv-list@matronics.com> > >Subject: RV-List: Anybody know the owner of this 6? > > > > > >> --> RV-List message posted by: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs@hotmail.com> > >> > >> > >> http://www.infra-read.com/pics/small/DCP_0826.JPG > >> > >> I'd like to find his name and email offlist. Want to talk to him about > >his > >> panel. > >> > >> > >> Dana Overall > >> Richmond, KY i39 > >> RV-7 slider, Imron black, "Black Magic" > >> Finish kit > >> 13B Rotary. Hangar flying my Dynon. > >> http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero1.jpg > >> http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero3.jpg > >> http://rvflying.tripod.com/blackrudder.jpg > >> do not archive > >> > >> > > > > > > >Scott Bilinski >Eng dept 305 >Phone (858) 657-2536 >Pager (858) 502-5190 >do not archive > > Watch high-quality video with fast playback at MSN Video. Free!


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:36:11 AM PST US
    From: "Matthew Brandes" <matthew@n523rv.com>
    Subject: RE: Dimple or countersink 904/976/922
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Matthew Brandes" <matthew@n523rv.com> Frank, The 904 flange is .040. The center section skin is .025 or .032, can't remember. The 972 skin is also .040. I called Van's and they said to dimple all three parts or I could countersink the 976/904 and dimple the 972 skin to fit in the countersink. That's the route I'm going to take. Matthew Brandes, Van's RV-9A (Wings/Fuselage) EAA Chapter 868/91 www.n523rv.com <http://www.n523rv.com/>


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:55:12 AM PST US
    From: P M Condon <pcondon@mitre.org>
    Subject: RV-List New VANS AD/Service Bulletin Notice posted on website
    --> RV-List message posted by: P M Condon <pcondon@mitre.org> A new inspect fuel tank SB is issued from Vans. One(so far) QB fuel tank was assembled with the clear plastic coating still adhered to the metal. Vans now uses a blue plastic skin........One time visual inspection to comply with SB.


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:01:27 AM PST US
    From: Oldsfolks@aol.com
    Subject: Re: >Re:Cool oil temps cure
    --> RV-List message posted by: Oldsfolks@aol.com Do you have a vernatherm valve on your engine ? This goes in place of the old oil screen and is the temp. control valve for oil flow through the oil cooler. It doesn't let oil flow through the cooler until the temp. is high enough to open the valve,then regulates the flow to keep the oil temp. where it belongs. Bob Olds RV-4 , N1191X A&P , EAA Tech. Counselor Charleston,Arkansas Real Aviators Fly Taildraggers


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:13:56 AM PST US
    From: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com> lucky macy wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com> > >Thanks a bunch Sam, >I keep hearing a common theme - avoids expensive breaker switches and >somehow get the impression it's a cheaper but not necessarily quicker or >lighter solution. > >Is one systems totoal cost actually significantly different than the other, >lighter than the other and easier to maintain once built? > Since we're not popping out 'standard' panels and each system is really custom, I'd say that any Van's wiring kit will come up short. Having said that, maybe someone will chime in and tell those of us that haven't got that far just exactly what the Van's wiring kit entails. Cost difference is so widely subjective that there can't really be any comparison. It depends on what quality you buy Vs what's in Van's kit. Do you buy Mil-spec wire or go to the auto parts place? Good aviation-quality crimp-on connectors or Home Depot? You can save some bucks in this area, but I don't recommend it. That'll show up in the maintenance category. >It's tough to ignore any system Van's does as overall if they decide to do >something it's usually hard to top and usually makes good customer sense. > But, how does he do the 'one size fits all' package? Is the wiring for an autopilot in his kit? How about wiring for strobes, nav lights and landing lights? The 'essential bus' was mentioned. I guess there's no dual battery sysetm in Vans's kit. there's just too many variables. >I'm just doing day/night vfr so worries about being down at IFR mins with an >all electric panel that suddenly goes black doesn't resonate with me. I >guess that is to say, I've never had a CB switch complaint yet but agree >their pricey. But if the big price difference between the two designs is >just with the cost between the 2 switch/fuse/breaker types used, I could >justify the higher expense of Van's design with lower building time on my >part to understand, find the parts to order, etc. > Finding the parts and ordering may not be so hard. Aeroelectric will sell you all the stuff you need. Can you buy them cheaper elsewhere? Maybe. It's the same dilemma as when you were looking for air tools. There is also Newark Electronics http://www.newark.com/ for electrical stuff ...... get their catalog as their web site is tough to navigate in. >Again, though, thanks for the info. > Wiring is a tough enough job as it is without being constrained by a 'one size fits all' kit. One problem is solved though, and that's choosing the wire sizes and the ckt breakers/fuses. The idea of using blade fuses is intriguing to me .... the breakers are large, expensive, and heavier, and if you get the 'pullable' breakers, they cost even more. You have to remember that breakers aren't there to protect the units that they feed, they are there to protect the wiring. Sizing wiring is a tedious and time consuming task in itself but will pay off in the long run. Most builders use too much wire, and the 'if this wire is good, a larger wire is better' mindset. This only adds weight and cost. Linn ..... soon to be in the same boat!!! Oops .... forget the boat!!! >lucky >


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:16:53 AM PST US
    From: "Jim Jewell" <jjewell@telus.net>
    Subject: Re: Cool oil temps cure
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Jewell" <jjewell@telus.net> Hi Jim, "The desired oil temperature range for Lycoming engines is from 165 degrees to 220 degrees F. If the aircraft has a winterization kit, it should be installed when operating in outside temperatures (OAT) that are below the 40 to 45 degree F range. If no winterization kit is supplied and the engine is `not' equipped with a thermostatic bypass valve, it may be necessary to improvise a means to of blocking off a portion of the air flow to the oil cooler." The above quotes are taken from page 49 of the 2002 Lycoming Flyer, Key reprints. this publication is given out free at the Lycoming display booths at air shows etc. chances are that it can be obtained by directly contacting Lycoming. I am assuming that the "thermostatic bypass valve" above and references to vernatherm and varatherm (Spelling?) oil temperature control devices on this list in the past are one and the same . I would think that one of these units in good condition would be well worth installing if one is not currently installed. I would be very cautious about installing a non Lycoming manual valve that could offer the chance to reduce oil flow manually. The risk of accidental excessive oil flow reduction and or shut off ! is to be avoided. Also try taping off both sides of the oil cooler as a test. Jim in Kelowna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net> Subject: RV-List: Cool oil temps cure > --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net> > > My -4 won't get the oil temps above 150 even with a plate blocking off the > inlet. Someone told me there was an oil control valve that could be > installed to manually regulate the flow of oil to the cooler. I know this > could be potentially dangerous but notwithstanding that does anyone know if > this info is bogus and if not who would sell these valves? > > Jim > >


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:31:46 AM PST US
    From: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com>
    Subject: Cool oil temps cure
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com> Hi Jim, One thing I suspect is that your engine may not have a Vernitherm, or if it does it may not be working. On my -360 powered RV6, I don't have a vernitherm and I have the same problem. The fix is to install either an oil screen housing that accepts a vernitherm, or one of the filter mounts that accepts a vernitherm, this keeps the oils from flowing to the cooler until it's warm enough....king of like a thermostat in your car radiator. Just one word of caution if you install an oil screen housing with a Vernitherm to an engine that didn't previously have one. Make sure you don't have the "viscosity valve" installed in the accessory case. If so, the plunger end will interefere with the tip of the vernitherm valve. Lycomings should have one or the other, but never both. Anyway, just my 2 cents! Cheers, Stein Bruch RV6's, Minneapolis -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jim Anglin Subject: RV-List: Cool oil temps cure --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net> My -4 won't get the oil temps above 150 even with a plate blocking off the inlet. Someone told me there was an oil control valve that could be installed to manually regulate the flow of oil to the cooler. I know this could be potentially dangerous but notwithstanding that does anyone know if this info is bogus and if not who would sell these valves? Jim


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:46:27 AM PST US
    From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net> RV8ter@aol.com wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: RV8ter@aol.com > > Ah, something concrete. > > This can't be prevented with Van's setup - maybe with slight modification? The "slight modification" involves the installation of a second bus and over-voltage protection which means that you then have.........Bob's system. :-) Sam Buchanan > > In a message dated 3/1/2004 12:16:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, > sbuc@hiwaay.net writes: > But suddenly being in the dark on a VFR night can be exciting! And, > Bob's system means you don't have to worry about a runaway alternator or > a failed master contactor.


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:56:33 AM PST US
    From: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com>
    Subject: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com> Here's my regular 2 cents.... I sell thousands of feet of wire and coax to homebuilders, and from MANY discussions with people building their panels, wiring methods, etc.. I've come to the following conclusions. #1) The Fuse/Toggle Switch route per 'lectric Bob, is by far easier, faster and quantitively cheaper than going with switches & breakers. #2) At least 80-90% of people building now are taking this (Bob Knuckolls) approach. #3) People shouldn't even talk about "non Mil-Spec" "home depot" wire, terminals etc.. Since you've no doubt spent $20-40K at a minimum to get to the point of wiring, and you've taken the time to build a good quality airplane, why skimp on something as important as wiring. It will still cost you "X" dollars, so the way I look at it, is if you're already spending 80% to do it, why not spend the other 20% and do it right! #4) Very few people actually build a panel to match the kit that Van's sells. Many of them end up cutting up Van's Wiring kit to use the wire, in which case it's almost a total waste of money (ok, not total waste--just overpriced). If you build a panel to their specs, it works fine. But....Add a Dynon, autopilot, GPS, engine monitor, etc.. and you'll need a lot more. That being said, if you are buying the Van's kit just for the wire and terminals, it's way more expensive than just buying the raw materials themselves. #5) Wiring your plane may seem intimidating, and you'll undoubtedly make a few mistakes, just like you did when setting your first rivets. But...you'll find in the end that's it's really quite easy and sometimes is even enjoyable! Last thing....B&C isn't the only game in town for wire, terminals, etc!!! I'm giving them a good run! Cheers, Stein Bruch RV6's, Minneapolis http://www.steinair.com (purveyor of aircraft wiring & avionics supplies). Do Not Archive


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:12:03 PM PST US
    From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com> back to reality. I just asked about Van's electric kits and drawings vs. Bob's whatever. No one is talking non-milspec wire and no one in the mid atlantic RV wing that I've asked has used Bob's approach and most have not even heard of him. Van's kit's were what they based their design off of, for future reference, and no one is complaining so far. Some have steam gauges, some have started off with electric, some have upgraded, etc. Van's *way* seems to be tailorable/modifiable to some degree hence my question in the first place. ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com> Subject: RE: RV-List: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach --> RV-List message posted by: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com> Here's my regular 2 cents.... I sell thousands of feet of wire and coax to homebuilders, and from MANY discussions with people building their panels, wiring methods, etc.. I've come to the following conclusions. #1) The Fuse/Toggle Switch route per 'lectric Bob, is by far easier, faster and quantitively cheaper than going with switches & breakers. #2) At least 80-90% of people building now are taking this (Bob Knuckolls) approach. #3) People shouldn't even talk about "non Mil-Spec" "home depot" wire, terminals etc.. Since you've no doubt spent $20-40K at a minimum to get to the point of wiring, and you've taken the time to build a good quality airplane, why skimp on something as important as wiring. It will still cost you "X" dollars, so the way I look at it, is if you're already spending 80% to do it, why not spend the other 20% and do it right! #4) Very few people actually build a panel to match the kit that Van's sells. Many of them end up cutting up Van's Wiring kit to use the wire, in which case it's almost a total waste of money (ok, not total waste--just overpriced). If you build a panel to their specs, it works fine. But....Add a Dynon, autopilot, GPS, engine monitor, etc.. and you'll need a lot more. That being said, if you are buying the Van's kit just for the wire and terminals, it's way more expensive than just buying the raw materials themselves. #5) Wiring your plane may seem intimidating, and you'll undoubtedly make a few mistakes, just like you did when setting your first rivets. But...you'll find in the end that's it's really quite easy and sometimes is even enjoyable! Last thing....B&C isn't the only game in town for wire, terminals, etc!!! I'm giving them a good run! Cheers, Stein Bruch RV6's, Minneapolis http://www.steinair.com (purveyor of aircraft wiring & avionics supplies). Do Not Archive Dream of owning a home? Find out how in the First-time Home Buying Guide.


    Message 38


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:12:03 PM PST US
    From: "John D. Heath" <altoq@direcway.com>
    Subject: Re: Cool oil temps cure
    --> RV-List message posted by: "John D. Heath" <altoq@direcway.com> Try this link http://www.chiefaircraft.com/cgi-bin/frame/frame-aircraft.cgi?URL=/Aircraft/OilSystem/VernithermValve.html John D ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com> Subject: RE: RV-List: Cool oil temps cure > --> RV-List message posted by: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com> > > Hi Jim, > > One thing I suspect is that your engine may not have a Vernitherm, or if it > does it may not be working. > > On my -360 powered RV6, I don't have a vernitherm and I have the same > problem. The fix is to install either an oil screen housing that accepts a > vernitherm, or one of the filter mounts that accepts a vernitherm, this > keeps the oils from flowing to the cooler until it's warm enough....king of > like a thermostat in your car radiator. > > Just one word of caution if you install an oil screen housing with a > Vernitherm to an engine that didn't previously have one. Make sure you > don't have the "viscosity valve" installed in the accessory case. If so, > the plunger end will interefere with the tip of the vernitherm valve. > Lycomings should have one or the other, but never both. > > Anyway, just my 2 cents! > > Cheers, > Stein Bruch > RV6's, Minneapolis > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jim Anglin > To: RV List > Subject: RV-List: Cool oil temps cure > > > --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net> > > My -4 won't get the oil temps above 150 even with a plate blocking off the > inlet. Someone told me there was an oil control valve that could be > installed to manually regulate the flow of oil to the cooler. I know this > could be potentially dangerous but notwithstanding that does anyone know if > this info is bogus and if not who would sell these valves? > > Jim > >


    Message 39


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:39:08 PM PST US
    From: Fly2eat@aol.com
    Subject: Re: HVLP systems
    --> RV-List message posted by: Fly2eat@aol.com Try Lexaire. Excellent gun and they back up their products. Call Bill or Liz at 978-663-7202. Tell them L.D. sent you. RV-8QB


    Message 40


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:44:00 PM PST US
    From: "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net>
    Subject: Re: HVLP systems
    --> RV-List message posted by: "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net> I don't understand why anyone uses the "vane/turbine" HVLP systems. They are very expensive and totally unnecessary. I have a DeVilbiss (spelling?) gun I bought 7 years ago that uses regular shop air compressor. I run turn the regulator down to about 10psi (have a gage on the heel of the spray gun) and fire away. I've been using it all this time for internal corrosion control priming and will use it for my external priming and finish coats. David Carter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Duncan" <brian2207@comcast.net> Subject: RV-List: HVLP systems > --> RV-List message posted by: "Brian Duncan" <brian2207@comcast.net> > > > Does anyone have experience with HVLP setups? Any brands to look for or > avoid? I'm looking at 3 or 4 stage turbine for priming and maybe finish. I'm > also need to do some re-finishing around the house. Any experiences would be > appreciated. Thanks. > > Brian > >


    Message 41


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:48:26 PM PST US
    From: Fly2eat@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: Fly2eat@aol.com How do I get my hands on Electric Bob's book I keep reading about in the RV list? L. D. RV-8QB 1087


    Message 42


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:59:49 PM PST US
    From: Wheeler North <wnorth@sdccd.cc.ca.us>
    Subject: Dynon Pitot
    --> RV-List message posted by: Wheeler North <wnorth@sdccd.cc.ca.us> The dynon pitot is a standard pitot, with a flat spot and a hole down below the pitot entrance for the AOA pressure. It provides the same values for the pitot that Van's pitot does. It is not a static source like some pitot tubes are, so you will need to use Vans simple system or ??? RE compass module. Mine in in outer rt wing, fwd of spar. I used two peices of wood .75" x 1.75" x 4" long sliced on the bottom at angles one for each axis. This allowed me to shim on each axis separately until it was inside of .2 deg in aligment with the D10. Then I bonded it all together and final shimed it with tape. The hold down screws were ss #6 flush head that were screwed up through the top peice of wood, then I used the plastic stand off nuts used on circuit boards to hold the module down. This was the only place on my plane that allows 12" of separation from all iron and wires. W


    Message 43


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:11:33 PM PST US
    From: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil@pressenter.com>
    Subject: Re: Flyin Leftovers, need a little help.
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil@pressenter.com> Hey Fellow Listers: Congrats Dana. Sounds like you put together a great gathering. Since I see everyone is already getting antsy for the fly-in season to start, allow me to continue to plug this spring's Twin Cities RV Fly-In. May 22 and 23 is the date and it had better be on your calendars (this is the hard sell technique!). This is going to be a BIG DEAL for RV pilots!!. Breakfast, door prizes, "wife rides", mini-seminars and it's all part of Discover Aviation Days at Anoka County Airport, just north of Minneapolis. The snow will be gone and IT WILL BE SPRINGTIME! Stay tuned on the Fly-In website: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~rvflyin/ Doug Weiler, pres MN Wing Alex Peterson RV Fly-in Chairman


    Message 44


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:56:19 PM PST US
    From: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com> Fly2eat@aol.com wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: Fly2eat@aol.com > >How do I get my hands on Electric Bob's book I keep reading about in the RV >list? L. D. RV-8QB 1087 > Go to http://www.aeroelectric.com/ Linn > > > >


    Message 45


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:20:59 PM PST US
    From: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com>
    Subject: More in FlowScan installation...
    vansairforce <vansairforce@yahoogroups.com> --> RV-List message posted by: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com> More on this subject... You got my interest peaked Jeff.....so I went looking for installation manuals for different engine monitors that use the FlowScan 201B... All of them said the following in one way or another: - The flow transducer should be installed in the fuel line and mounted to a horizontal surface as described below. - A screen or filter should be installed upstream of the flow transducer to screen out debris which could affect rotor movement or settle in V-bearings. - As turbulence upstream of the transducer affects its performance, there should be a reasonable length of straight line between the transducer inlet and the first valve, elbow, or other turbulence producing device. - Install flow transducer with wire leads pointed UP to vent bubbles and insure that the rotor is totally immersed in liquid. - For maximum accuracy at low flow rates the transducer should be mounted on a horizontal surface. I only found one that said anything about the actual location, and it said: ...has seen good results with the following mounting: 1. The transducer in a stationary location in line between the electric boost pump and the engine driven pump. 2. The transducer in a stationary location in line between the fuel injection servo and the distribution block. 3. The transducer in a stationary location in line between the Engine driven pump and the Carburetor I have a call into FlowScan for more info, but from what I have ready today, I see no problem with installing where I did... When I hear back from FlowScan I will update this post... -Bill VonDane EAA Tech Counselor RV-8A ~ N8WV ~ Colorado Springs www.vondane.com www.creativair.com www.epanelbuilder.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "pittsakro" <jfarrar1@cox.net> Subject: [rv8list] Re: N8WV Upgrades... Bill, I would advise against the location that you chose for the flowscan. The flow meter is a point of restriction in the line. When there is a restriction on the suction side of a pump, there can/will be cavitation.....bubbles. It depends on the temp of the fluid and the suction head of the pump. I believe that there is a risk in your installation. I've got mine on the discharge side of the engine pump w/ flex lines in and out, reasonably straight and the error is less than 1%. Jeff Farrar N4ZJ 385hrs EAA Tech Counselor EAA Flight Adviser --- In rv8list@yahoogroups.com, Bill VonDane <bill@v...> wrote: > I decided to do some upgrades to my -8A, and have a new page on my site that > I will be posting the details to if anyone is interested... > > http://www.vondane.com/rv8a/finish/finish13.htm > > > -Bill VonDane > EAA Tech Counselor > RV-8A ~ N8WV ~ Colorado Springs > www.vondane.com > www.creativair.com > www.epanelbuilder.com


    Message 46


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:03:35 PM PST US
    From: "BRUCE GRAY" <brucerv84us@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Fly-in info.
    --> RV-List message posted by: "BRUCE GRAY" <brucerv84us@hotmail.com> I'm dropping this quick message to the list about more detailed information about are fly-in. This is the Carson City, NV. Fly-in we're talking about. Two sights you can visit which are vansairforce.net. Once there look in the left hand column and you will see Activities Calendar, click on there and scroll to the bottom and our information is posted. The other sight is vansaircraft.com which will have some information and then forward to the first sight for the same information. If you are looking for further information drop me an e-mail and I will try to answer all of your questions. We still have minor details to work out but the event is on so plan forit. Hope to see you all there. Bruce Gray in Nevada.


    Message 47


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:03:35 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: HVLP systems
    From: Michael D Hilger <rvsixer@juno.com>
    --> RV-List message posted by: Michael D Hilger <rvsixer@juno.com> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:40:46 -0600 "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net> writes: > --> RV-List message posted by: "David Carter" > <dcarter@datarecall.net> > > I don't understand why anyone uses the "vane/turbine" HVLP systems. > They > are very expensive and totally unnecessary. > > I have a DeVilbiss (spelling?) gun I bought 7 years ago that uses > regular > shop air compressor. I run turn the regulator down to about 10psi > (have a > gage on the heel of the spray gun) and fire away. I've been using > it all > this time for internal corrosion control priming and will use it for > my > external priming and finish coats. > > David Carter The HVLP guns that use shop air are called "conversion guns". A friend of mine used one to paint my -6 and it was amazing how little overspray there was. Nice finish, too. I have used the turbine type, too. They also worked great except they heat the supply air. The conversion gun we used is made by whoever bought out Croix Air. Mike Hilger RV-6 N207AM 550 hours


    Message 48


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:15:58 PM PST US
    From: Jason Sneed <n242ds@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: More in FlowScan installation...
    --> RV-List message posted by: Jason Sneed <n242ds@cox.net> Just for general information... I did not follow the directions at all.. I have turns in the line before and after the floscan, I also did not mount it to a horizontal surface. But, it works great and is highly accurate. I would say it is within an 1/8 to a 1/10 of a gallon. My fuel gages do not work for some reason so I use this as my fuel gage. I was thinking about ordering the princeton fuel gages from grad rapids, but I do not know how hard it would be to pull out the old non working gages and replace them with new ones, if anyone has any info on this please send me an email. thanks, Jason Sneed n242ds@cox.net On Mar 1, 2004, at 4:20 PM, Bill VonDane wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com> > > More on this subject... You got my interest peaked Jeff.....so I went > looking for installation manuals for different engine monitors that > use the > FlowScan 201B... All of them said the following in one way or another: > > - The flow transducer should be installed in the fuel line and mounted > to a > horizontal surface as described below. > - A screen or filter should be installed upstream of the flow > transducer to > screen out debris which could affect rotor movement or settle in > V-bearings. > - As turbulence upstream of the transducer affects its performance, > there > should be a reasonable length of straight line between the transducer > inlet > and the first valve, elbow, or other turbulence producing device. > - Install flow transducer with wire leads pointed UP to vent bubbles > and > insure that the rotor is totally immersed in liquid. > - For maximum accuracy at low flow rates the transducer should be > mounted on > a horizontal surface. > > I only found one that said anything about the actual location, and it > said: > > ...has seen good results with the following mounting: > 1. The transducer in a stationary location in line between the electric > boost pump and the engine driven pump. > 2. The transducer in a stationary location in line between the fuel > injection servo and the distribution block. > 3. The transducer in a stationary location in line between the Engine > driven > pump and the Carburetor > > I have a call into FlowScan for more info, but from what I have ready > today, > I see no problem with installing where I did... When I hear back from > FlowScan I will update this post... > > -Bill VonDane > EAA Tech Counselor > RV-8A ~ N8WV ~ Colorado Springs > www.vondane.com > www.creativair.com > www.epanelbuilder.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "pittsakro" <jfarrar1@cox.net> > To: <rv8list@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [rv8list] Re: N8WV Upgrades... > > > Bill, I would advise against the location that you chose for the > flowscan. The flow meter is a point of restriction in the line. > When there is a restriction on the suction side of a pump, there > can/will be cavitation.....bubbles. It depends on the temp of the > fluid and the suction head of the pump. I believe that there is a > risk in your installation. I've got mine on the discharge side of > the engine pump w/ flex lines in and out, reasonably straight and the > error is less than 1%. > > Jeff Farrar > N4ZJ 385hrs > EAA Tech Counselor > EAA Flight Adviser > > --- In rv8list@yahoogroups.com, Bill VonDane <bill@v...> wrote: >> I decided to do some upgrades to my -8A, and have a new page on my > site that >> I will be posting the details to if anyone is interested... >> >> http://www.vondane.com/rv8a/finish/finish13.htm >> >> >> -Bill VonDane >> EAA Tech Counselor >> RV-8A ~ N8WV ~ Colorado Springs >> www.vondane.com >> www.creativair.com >> www.epanelbuilder.com > > > _- > ======================================================================= > _- > ======================================================================= > _- > ======================================================================= > _- > ======================================================================= > > > > Jason Sneed Commercial Lending Officer First National Bank and Trust


    Message 49


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:16:13 PM PST US
    From: "Bob Hodgson" <bob@hodgson252.freeserve.co.uk>
    Subject: Tach drive
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Bob Hodgson" <bob@hodgson252.freeserve.co.uk> Thanks to all who replied to my recent questions. Got another one! How big is the tach gen (IE VTACHGEN 2) for Van's tachometer (IE VTACH3500) ? - Specifically the width / diameter. I have an inverted oil pickup on the vac pump pad, and need to know whether the tacho gen will interfere with it. (The pickup is just a 3/16" plate with a hose boss in the centre). Want to avoid using the one with the extension if possible, as it would need to be bent rather severely to fit in the limited space between engine and firewall on the -3 Thanks again Bob (UK) 3B details


    Message 50


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:50:40 PM PST US
    From: "Ed Holyoke" <bicyclop@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Ed Holyoke" <bicyclop@pacbell.net> Add to the basic tenets of 'lectric Bob's system: A) Fuel on board should be the limiting factor of duration of flight not battery capacity. B) Active notification of alternator failure / low voltage condition so you can shed load and save battery for comfortable conclusion of flight. Ed Holyoke --> RV-List message posted by: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net> Here are some of the basic tenets of Bob's system: 1) Elimination of single point failure scenarios. This is the biggie. The horror stories we all have heard about "electrical failure" in aircraft can be designed out of the system, and Bob has done so. His system assures that regardless of what happens to the electrical system, there is a work-around (usually just flipping one switch) that will allow the flight to have a happy conclusion. 2) Elimination of expensive (and unnecessary) breakers. Bob's system is based on readily available and reliable automotive blade fuses. The rationale is that there is very little troubleshooting that can be done in-flight with breakers, and with the proper design, an electrical system can't be shot down with one or two circuit failures. Land and do the trouble shooting on the ground. 3) Very reasonable cost due to the above use of automotive technology and elimination of "aircraft" stuff. :-) 4) Absolute protection from over-voltage scenarios. The traditional system of aircraft wiring does not provide for any of the above advantages. I find it interesting that the new state-of-the-art aircraft (Cirrus and the glass cockpit Cessnas) have dual bus systems similar to Bob's design. As I mentioned before, if a builder refuses to take the time to study the dual bus architecture, they might as well go with the Vans cookbook (and its inherent flaws) because Bob's system will be Greek to them. We are fortunate to have choices so we can use whichever system we are most comfortable with. Sam Buchanan (RV-6, 5502 hrs, 'Lectric Bob's system throughout, no blown fuses or scary electrical moments) http://thervjournal.com


    Message 51


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:27:04 PM PST US
    From: "LarryRobertHelming" <lhelming@sigecom.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: "LarryRobertHelming" <lhelming@sigecom.net> Please understand I am not attacking you on this. We all have our opinion. But opinions change with experience and knowledge and challenged viewpoints sometimes. If as you say no one around you has even heard of Bob, IMHO, it sounds like your group would greatly benefit from having Bob N. give one of his weekend seminars in your neck of the woods. In addition, get signed up for the Aero-electric newsgroup that Matronics maintains. Use the archives there to look at various things you might have a question about. Search on "Vans" for instance and see what has been written in the past. I like the RV plane and I think Vans is one of the true geniuses of our times. But his electronics are more basic than I expected after reading Bob. I guess you know one of Van's planes will fly without any electronics don't you? We don't have to put in any electronics. Electronics is an option and that is why it is not part of the standard kit. You will learn a lot and will do everyone in your club a great service by getting Bob to put on a seminar near you. Bob's way is the better and safer way. As I wrote earlier, I studied and learned Bob's way first and could not get myself to do it the Vans way after knowing what I knew was a better way. Best wishes. Indiana Larry, RV7 Tip-up TMX-O-360 ACS2002 Dynon CNS430 Digitrak Jeff Rose Bob's E-Buss Firewall Forward ----- Original Message ----- From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: RV-List: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach > --> RV-List message posted by: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com> > > back to reality. > > I just asked about Van's electric kits and drawings vs. Bob's whatever. No > one is talking non-milspec wire and no one in the mid atlantic RV wing that > I've asked has used Bob's approach and most have not even heard of him. > Van's kit's were what they based their design off of, for future reference, > and no one is complaining so far. Some have steam gauges, some have started > off with electric, some have upgraded, etc. Van's *way* seems to be > tailorable/modifiable to some degree hence my question in the first place. > > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com> > To: <rv-list@matronics.com> > Subject: RE: RV-List: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach > Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:49:15 -0600 > > --> RV-List message posted by: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com> > > Here's my regular 2 cents.... > > I sell thousands of feet of wire and coax to homebuilders, and from MANY > discussions with people building their panels, wiring methods, etc.. I've > come to the following conclusions. > > #1) The Fuse/Toggle Switch route per 'lectric Bob, is by far easier, faster > and quantitively cheaper than going with switches & breakers. > > #2) At least 80-90% of people building now are taking this (Bob Knuckolls) > approach. > > #3) People shouldn't even talk about "non Mil-Spec" "home depot" wire, > terminals etc.. Since you've no doubt spent $20-40K at a minimum to get to > the point of wiring, and you've taken the time to build a good quality > airplane, why skimp on something as important as wiring. It will still cost > you "X" dollars, so the way I look at it, is if you're already spending 80% > to do it, why not spend the other 20% and do it right! > > #4) Very few people actually build a panel to match the kit that Van's > sells. Many of them end up cutting up Van's Wiring kit to use the wire, in > which case it's almost a total waste of money (ok, not total waste--just > overpriced). If you build a panel to their specs, it works fine. > But....Add a Dynon, autopilot, GPS, engine monitor, etc.. and you'll need a > lot more. That being said, if you are buying the Van's kit just for the > wire and terminals, it's way more expensive than just buying the raw > materials themselves. > > #5) Wiring your plane may seem intimidating, and you'll undoubtedly make a > few mistakes, just like you did when setting your first rivets. > But...you'll find in the end that's it's really quite easy and sometimes is > even enjoyable! > > Last thing....B&C isn't the only game in town for wire, terminals, etc!!! > I'm giving them a good run! > > Cheers, > Stein Bruch > RV6's, Minneapolis > > http://www.steinair.com (purveyor of aircraft wiring & avionics supplies). > > Do Not Archive > > > Dream of owning a home? Find out how in the First-time Home Buying Guide. > >


    Message 52


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:52:46 PM PST US
    From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@earthlink.net>
    Subject: More in FlowScan installation...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson@earthlink.net> > - The flow transducer should be installed in the fuel line > and mounted to a horizontal surface as described below. > - A screen or filter should be installed upstream of the flow > transducer to screen out debris which could affect rotor > movement or settle in V-bearings. > - As turbulence upstream of the transducer affects its > performance, there should be a reasonable length of straight > line between the transducer inlet and the first valve, elbow, > or other turbulence producing device. > - Install flow transducer with wire leads pointed UP to vent > bubbles and insure that the rotor is totally immersed in liquid. > - For maximum accuracy at low flow rates the transducer > should be mounted on a horizontal surface. There is a plane around here which had the Floscan mounted with the flow direction incorrect. At around 8 hours total time, the engine stopped running at about 200 agl on takeoff. The plane sustained some damage, and was repaired. The Floscan people apparently said that this could happen. I don't understand it and remain skeptical, because I can't think of why it worked for 8 hours and then stopped. Be careful of flow direction. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN RV6-A N66AP 443 hours http://www.home.earthlink.net/~alexpeterson/


    Message 53


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:25:11 PM PST US
    From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com>
    Subject: which oil cooler for the angle valve 200hp engine?
    --> RV-List message posted by: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com> Are folks going with the stewart warner style oil cooler for this engine even though it doesn't specify the 200hp engine? only the positech 4215 says it's for the io-360 but it weighs twice as much and appears to be smaller. Plus the *old* design had too dense a pattern and didn't cool as well as the SW version. What's the scoop? Learn how to help protect your privacy and prevent fraud online at Tech


    Message 54


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:33:43 PM PST US
    From: Dave Bristol <bj034@lafn.org>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: Dave Bristol <bj034@lafn.org> Sam Buchanan wrote: >...If you try to implement the dual bus system without understanding the reasons for it, it will make absolutely no sense and you will have no idea how to properly use it or >troubleshoot. > > Guys, Just be sure that you REALLY understand this system because when you land in the middle of North Dakota with an electrical problem YOU are going to be the expert - the mechanic on duty at the FBO isn't going to know squat about it. And of course there's the poor shmuck that you sell it to later on.... Dave RV6 So Cal EAA Technical Counselor


    Message 55


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:34:52 PM PST US
    From: Fiveonepw@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: Fiveonepw@aol.com In a message dated 03/01/2004 2:13:48 PM Central Standard Time, luckymacy@hotmail.com writes: back to reality. There is no reality like being at 3000' agl at night and the airplane goes dark... not a scare tactic, just one scenario we should all give a good "what if?" to... Van's *way* seems to be tailorable/modifiable to some degree hence my question in the first place. If I can offer one insight- I am an industrial electrician with 25 years in the biz- not an aviation specialist, but someone who endeavors to understand electricity. When I took a look at Bob's crowbar circuit for overvoltage protection and understood the elegant simplicity and usefulness of it, it was one of those epiphanal moments that told me "you might want to pay attention to this dude- he is way ahead of the curve"- kinda like some guy named VanGrunsven is way ahead of other folk making airplanes- Sam Buchanan gave the most logical argument I've seen yet- mine is a little more esorteric, FWIW... The system offered by Vans may work fine for many builders, but by following the Nuckolls approach, I'm confident that I not only understand everything going on in my system ('cept for them "little black boxes" that only the padded-cell folk grok) but I can competently deal with any "emergencies" I may encounter and be able to effectively troubleshoot anything that might go badly, but always once safely on terra firma. And now I'll really stir it up: Why go with a taildragger when you could have had the little wheel up front? (Duck and cover- here it comes!) 8-) I'm KIDDING! TO EACH THEIR OWN!! From The PossumWorks in TN Mark Phillips


    Message 56


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:47:29 PM PST US
    From: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil@pressenter.com>
    Subject: Re: More in FlowScan installation...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil@pressenter.com> ----- > > > > - The flow transducer should be installed in the fuel line and mounted > > to a > > horizontal surface as described below. > > - A screen or filter should be installed upstream of the flow > > transducer to > > screen out debris which could affect rotor movement or settle in > > V-bearings. Just curious... how many of you have a filter upstream of your fuel flow transducer?? I do not since the instructions for installation from EI (maker of my fuel computer) did not call for one. Is this really needed?? Doug Weiler RV-5 105 hours


    Message 57


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:07:09 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@bowenaero.com>
    Subject: More in FlowScan installation...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com> My gascolator is upstream. - Larry Bowen Larry@BowenAero.com http://BowenAero.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Weiler [mailto:dougweil@pressenter.com] > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 8:45 PM > To: rv-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: More in FlowScan installation... > > > --> RV-List message posted by: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil@pressenter.com> > > > ----- > > > > > - The flow transducer should be installed in the fuel line and > > > mounted to a horizontal surface as described below. > > > - A screen or filter should be installed upstream of the flow > > > transducer to > > > screen out debris which could affect rotor movement or settle in > > > V-bearings. > > > Just curious... how many of you have a filter upstream of > your fuel flow transducer?? I do not since the instructions > for installation from EI (maker of my fuel computer) did not > call for one. Is this really needed?? > > Doug Weiler > RV-5 105 hours


    Message 58


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:12:36 PM PST US
    From: "Dean Pichon" <deanpichon@msn.com>
    Subject: Cool oil temps cure
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Dean Pichon" <deanpichon@msn.com> Hi Jim, I have the same problem with my -4. On cold days, I cannot get the oil temperature above 150F -even with the downstream side of the cooler blocked. I plan to block the upstream side as I have been told this is much more effective though much less easily done. I don't believe the Vernatherm valve is your problem - assuming you have one. Vernatherm valves are normally open, and close upon a rise in temperature. They contain a wax pill much like car thermostats. As the heat of the oil melts the wax, it expands thereby extending a piston. This piston extension blocks a hole that otherwise returns oil to the engine. The alternate path (Vernatherm extended) shunts the oil through the cooler. Even when the Vernatherm valve is cold, it leaks (by design) oil through the cooler. Regarding the manual valve, I've never heard of such a system, but it would probably help - assuming you were comfortable with any safety issues. I suggest you try blocking the upstream side of the cooler and let me know how it works! Good luck, Dean RV-4 Worcester, MA 180 Hrs >From: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net> >Reply-To: rv-list@matronics.com >To: "RV List" <rv-list@matronics.com> >Subject: RV-List: Cool oil temps cure >Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 08:14:30 -0800 > >--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Anglin" <jlanglin44@earthlink.net> > >My -4 won't get the oil temps above 150 even with a plate blocking off the >inlet. Someone told me there was an oil control valve that could be >installed to manually regulate the flow of oil to the cooler. I know this >could be potentially dangerous but notwithstanding that does anyone know if >this info is bogus and if not who would sell these valves? > >Jim > > Learn how to help protect your privacy and prevent fraud online at Tech


    Message 59


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:31:49 PM PST US
    From: "Travis Hamblen" <TravisHamblen@cox.net>
    Subject: Breather tube tank...
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Travis Hamblen" <TravisHamblen@cox.net> I have read that many people have designed a homemade breather tube tank that they empty as needed as opposed to having the output slime up the belly of the plane. I am considering doing the same and have a couple solid ideas on how to do it the safest possible way (i.e.=85 whistle slot in breather tube & vented tank). I would like to learn from anyone else=92s experiences prior to making my own tank, so please respond here or directly to my e-mail address with any input you may have!!! I would really appreciate any photos or diagrams of your installation. Like I said, any help would be GREATLY appreciated! Thanks in advance=85. Travis Hamblen RV-6A @ VGT (North Las Vegas, NV) -- Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).


    Message 60


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:34:27 PM PST US
    From: kempthornes <kempthornes@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Dynon Pitot
    --> RV-List message posted by: kempthornes <kempthornes@earthlink.net> At 12:59 PM 3/1/2004, you wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: Wheeler North <wnorth@sdccd.cc.ca.us> > >The dynon pitot is a standard pitot, with a flat spot and a hole down below >the pitot entrance for the AOA pressure. But, it is unheated and so not good for IFR, correct? K. H. (Hal) Kempthorne RV6-a N7HK - Three trips to OSH now. PRB (El Paso de Robles, CA)


    Message 61


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:40:14 PM PST US
    From: Leesafur@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Dynon Pitot
    --> RV-List message posted by: Leesafur@aol.com In a message dated 3/1/2004 8:35:10 PM Central Standard Time, kempthornes@earthlink.net writes: But, it is unheated and so not good for IFR, correct? They have both heated and unheated. http://www.dynonavionics.com/docs/pitotfeatures.html Lee Anoka, MN RV-3 Wing


    Message 62


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:03:53 PM PST US
    From: "Phil Sisson, Litchfield Aerobatic Club" <sisson@consolidated.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Phil Sisson, Litchfield Aerobatic Club" <sisson@consolidated.net> Fiveonepw@aol.com wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: Fiveonepw@aol.com > > In a message dated 03/01/2004 2:13:48 PM Central Standard Time, > luckymacy@hotmail.com writes: > > back to reality. > > There is no reality like being at 3000' agl at night and the airplane goes > dark... not a scare tactic, just one scenario we should all give a good "what > if?" to... > Van's *way* seems to be > tailorable/modifiable to some degree hence my question in the first place. > If I can offer one insight- I am an industrial electrician with 25 years in > the biz- not an aviation specialist, but someone who endeavors to understand > electricity. When I took a look at Bob's crowbar circuit for overvoltage > protection and understood the elegant simplicity and usefulness of it, it was one of > those epiphanal moments that told me "you might want to pay attention to this > dude- he is way ahead of the curve"- kinda like some guy named VanGrunsven is > way ahead of other folk making airplanes- Sam Buchanan gave the most logical > argument I've seen yet- mine is a little more esorteric, FWIW... The system > offered by Vans may work fine for many builders, but by following the Nuckolls > approach, I'm confident that I not only understand everything going on in my > system ('cept for them "little black boxes" that only the padded-cell folk > grok) but I can competently deal with any "emergencies" I may encounter and be > able to effectively troubleshoot anything that might go badly, but always once > safely on terra firma. > > And now I'll really stir it up: Why go with a taildragger when you could > have had the little wheel up front? > > (Duck and cover- here it comes!) 8-) I'm KIDDING! TO EACH THEIR OWN!! > > >From The PossumWorks in TN > Mark Phillips To save a little weight.... just like the fuses vs them old heavy circuit breakers. tee-hee..


    Message 63


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:05:51 PM PST US
    From: "Will & Lynda Allen" <linenwool@comcast.net>
    Subject: wing hole size for Van's conduit
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Will & Lynda Allen" <linenwool@comcast.net> I'm going to go with the conduit from van's in my wings and am wondering what size the holes need to be drilled. Also, is it a big deal if I use a regular drill bit instead of a unibit since I'm using a drill press.. and.. well. don't want to wait until I can get to the store to get a bigger unibit. Will I need this conduit anywhere else or should I just order the '25 feet? Thanks, -Will Allen North Bend, Wa RV8 wings


    Message 64


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:16:16 PM PST US
    From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay@jetstream.net>
    Subject: Re: which oil cooler for the angle valve 200hp engine?
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay@jetstream.net> Hi Lucky: I would recommend the Stewart Warner 9 row cooler, contact Pacific Oil Cooler Service, Inc 1-800-866-7335 believe they have a clone of this cooler at a good price. Also they have been in business for 45 years and can answer all your questions. I am running two of them. Eustace Bowhay, Blind Bay. B.C. RV 10 # 30. Emp-Tail Cone competed working on wings. ----- Original Message ----- From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com> Subject: RV-List: which oil cooler for the angle valve 200hp engine? > --> RV-List message posted by: "lucky macy" <luckymacy@hotmail.com> > > Are folks going with the stewart warner style oil cooler for this engine > even though it doesn't specify the 200hp engine? > > only the positech 4215 says it's for the io-360 but it weighs twice as much > and appears to be smaller. Plus the *old* design had too dense a pattern and > didn't cool as well as the SW version. What's the scoop? > > Learn how to help protect your privacy and prevent fraud online at Tech > >


    Message 65


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:21:45 PM PST US
    From: "Terri Watson" <windsaloft@rmisp.com>
    Subject: Orndorff RV-8 Wing Videos for sale
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Terri Watson" <windsaloft@rmisp.com> Have the two for building the RV-8 Wing. I think they are $41 + shipping new. Will pass these on to the first person who will commit to and send a check for $30, shipping via priority mail (USPS) included. Contact info below "Whatever you can do or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it." - Goethe's Faust Terri Watson Winds Aloft Aviation, Inc. windsaloft@rmisp.com


    Message 66


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:37:02 PM PST US
    From: "Douglas A. Fischer" <dfischer@iserv.net>
    Subject: Re: Dynon Pitot
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Douglas A. Fischer" <dfischer@iserv.net> Glad to hear it. I'm just starting my wings and I'm beginning to think about acquiring the additional stuff like heated pitot, autopilot servo, landing lights, etc. Good to see an alternative to the other $430 rip-off pitot. Doug Fischer -9A #90706 Wings ----- Original Message ----- From: <EricHe@FlexSolPackaging.com> Subject: RV-List: Dynon Pitot > --> RV-List message posted by: <EricHe@FlexSolPackaging.com> > > > I'm getting ready to order my Dynon, I specifically asked them this last week. Their reply was, a pitot is a pitot. They also said it was built to fit the standard (Gretz) mount. Can't answer anything about AOA, LRI, functions. Don't know, Don't care. > > > >Unfortunately, the Dynon website says the pitot will only work with their > >EFIS-D10. It sounds like if you want their pitot for anything else you're > >out of luck. Anybody know for certain? > > > >Doug Fischer > >RV-9A 90706 Wings > >


    Message 67


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:04:30 PM PST US
    From: Leesafur@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Dynon Pitot
    --> RV-List message posted by: Leesafur@aol.com In a message dated 3/1/2004 9:38:49 PM Central Standard Time, dfischer@iserv.net writes: Glad to hear it. I'm just starting my wings and I'm beginning to think about acquiring the additional stuff like heated pitot, autopilot servo, landing lights, etc. Good to see an alternative to the other $430 rip-off pitot. Doug Fischer -9A #90706 Wings The pitot is an introductory price of $199 then it will go up a $100 I think that's what they told me. You can get the mount at http://www.gretzaero.com/ DO NOT ARCHIVE Lee Anoka, MN RV-3 Wing Working on fuel tank


    Message 68


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:19:22 PM PST US
    From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: Sam Buchanan <sbuc@hiwaay.net> Dave Bristol wrote: > --> RV-List message posted by: Dave Bristol <bj034@lafn.org> > > > Sam Buchanan wrote: > > >> ...If you try to implement the dual bus system without >> understanding the reasons for it, it will make absolutely no sense >> and you will have no idea how to properly use it or troubleshoot. >> >> > > Guys, > > Just be sure that you REALLY understand this system because when you > land in the middle of North Dakota with an electrical problem YOU are > going to be the expert - the mechanic on duty at the FBO isn't going > to know squat about it. And of course there's the poor shmuck that > you sell it to later on.... > > Dave RV6 So Cal EAA Technical Counselor Well, we seem to have dropped back into old school thought mode again. There is no reason for the local mechanic (or the pilot) to panic when you land with "an electrical problem". If an electrical glitch occurs, it will be associated with a component in the avionics or the charging system, not the dual bus wiring architecture itself. For the mechanic, troubleshooting is no different than a spam can; find where the wire shorted against the airframe, fix it and put in a new fuse. The only components unique to "Lectric Bob's system is a diode between the buses and his over voltage module. The more elaborate systems will have an extra battery and couple of extra contactors. But the system itself is bulletproof, otherwise there would be no rationale for adopting it. Most of the system is the usual stuff, just wired together in a different scheme than "normal". But a blown fuse is a blown fuse regardless of what kind of wiring system the plane has and is diagnosed in the same old manner. And all of us carry a wiring schematic in our plane......don't we? Sam Buchanan


    Message 69


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:29:31 PM PST US
    From: "Joe Proctor" <pjoe2@qwest.net>
    Subject: Builders Manual + 21 years of the RV-ator
    --> RV-List message posted by: "Joe Proctor" <pjoe2@qwest.net> Hay List I have the Builders Manual for the RV 9/9A + 21 years of the RV-ator for SALE - Best Offer + Shipping. Joe Proctor pjoe2@qwest.net


    Message 70


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:09:54 PM PST US
    From: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Van's vs Electric Bob's approach
    --> RV-List message posted by: linn walters <lwalters2@cfl.rr.com> Sam Buchanan wrote: >Well, we seem to have dropped back into old school thought mode again. >There is no reason for the local mechanic (or the pilot) to panic when >you land with "an electrical problem". If an electrical glitch occurs, >it will be associated with a component in the avionics or the charging >system, not the dual bus wiring architecture itself. For the mechanic, >troubleshooting is no different than a spam can; find where the wire >shorted against the airframe, fix it and put in a new fuse. > >The only components unique to "Lectric Bob's system is a diode between >the buses and his over voltage module. The more elaborate systems will >have an extra battery and couple of extra contactors. But the system >itself is bulletproof, otherwise there would be no rationale for >adopting it. Most of the system is the usual stuff, just wired together >in a different scheme than "normal". But a blown fuse is a blown fuse >regardless of what kind of wiring system the plane has and is diagnosed >in the same old manner. > >And all of us carry a wiring schematic in our plane......don't we? > >Sam Buchanan > I agree with Sam ..... to a point. I find most of the A&Ps lacking in electrical knowledge. They're in the same boat as car mechanics that don't understand computer controlled stuff. I can't count the number of A&Ps that I've helped troubleshoot a charging system failure. But then electricity and electronics is MY strong point. Faced with a radically different electrical system (What's that other battery do?) most A&Ps will probably shy away from working on it ..... or will spend your money as they try to figure it out. Almost all their electrical knowledge above the basics is gained from OJT, and the systems in the Certificated aircraft are almost identical, and that makes troubleshooting a lot easier for them. Bottom line is that the builder (if possible) will probably do most of the troubleshooting. I'm not denigrating the A&Ps out there .... they work their butt off for a paycheck that's far from making them rich. My hat's off to them for the work they do. The comment was made about the poor sucker that buys your dual buss electrical system ..... be nice to them (and yourself while you troubleshoot your own problems ..... and at least make a wire list. Drawing really good schematics is an art-form in itself and very time consuming .... and a wire list is the second best thing you can have. Numbering wiring is really time consuming too, but a couple of swipes with a few different color magic markers can really help. Make up your own code or use the resister code. All kinds of options!! Linn > > > >


    Message 71


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:44 PM PST US
    From: Jason Sneed <n242ds@cox.net>
    Subject: i39 pictures
    --> RV-List message posted by: Jason Sneed <n242ds@cox.net> Here are my pics from the i39 fly in if anyone is interested. Hope this works, first time I have used this program. I think the link is this: http://www.highland-parks.com/i39%20flyin/ if not then try: http://www.highland-parks.com/i39 flyin/ Jason Sneed Commercial Lending Officer First National Bank and Trust


    Message 72


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:42:27 PM PST US
    From: David Aronson <aronsond@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Weight/balance program
    --> RV-List message posted by: David Aronson <aronsond@pacbell.net> hey listers: I have looked in the archives but can't find weight and balance program. Anyone with a program I would appreciate it. Dave Aronson RV4 N504RV FINALLY FINISHED<) inspection Saturday


    Message 73


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:44:52 PM PST US
    From: David Aronson <aronsond@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Re: VM 1000 & Single Drive Dual Mag (DLN 3000)
    --> RV-List message posted by: David Aronson <aronsond@pacbell.net> Call VM and they will send you a diagram. The sensor is glued to the outside of the case at a specific position. i followed their directions and it works perfectly. Dave Aronson RV4 N504RV Esten Spears <ewspears@comcast.net> wrote: --> RV-List message posted by: "Esten Spears" Has anyone installed a VM 1000 Engine Monitor with a Single Drive Dual Mag? If So; What Tach Sensor did you use and where and how did you mount it?????? The instructions call for it to be placed in the gear inspection port where it picks up the passing gear teeth. The single drive dual mag has such ports but it uses nylon gears so I don't think the sensor would see anything. Any help would be appreciated! Esten Spears, RV8A, 80922, N922ES (reserved), Leeward Air Ranch, Ocala, FL


    Message 74


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:48:58 PM PST US
    From: Jeff Point <jpoint@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Weight/balance program
    --> RV-List message posted by: Jeff Point <jpoint@mindspring.com> Bill Vondane's site: http://www.vondane.com/rv8a/downloads/index.htm You will have to modify the stations for the 4, but no big deal. Congrats on your inspection. Mine's on saturday also. Jeff Point RV-6 getting reeeaaallllyyy close Milwaukee WI David Aronson wrote: >--> RV-List message posted by: David Aronson <aronsond@pacbell.net> > >hey listers: >I have looked in the archives but can't find weight and balance program. Anyone with a program I would appreciate it. >Dave Aronson >RV4 N504RV >FINALLY FINISHED<) inspection Saturday > > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv-list
  • Browse RV-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --