Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:21 AM - Re: -4 fuse jig (Gould, Richard AE1 NAVTESTWINGPAC 561000E)
2. 01:13 AM - Re: hidden pitot tube (BrooksRV6@webtv.net (Chris Brooks))
3. 04:27 AM - Re: RV-List Skidding (Steve Struyk)
4. 07:09 AM - Re: RV-List Skidding (Rob Prior)
5. 07:46 AM - Re: RV-List Skidding (Hopperdhh@aol.com)
6. 08:21 AM - Re: RV-List Skidding (Dean)
7. 09:14 AM - RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (thomas a. sargent)
8. 10:10 AM - Re: VOR Antenna (HCRV6@aol.com)
9. 10:29 AM - IO-360 Engine problem (RVEIGHTA@aol.com)
10. 10:56 AM - [ Rob Ray ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! (Email List Photo Shares)
11. 11:04 AM - [ Rob Ray ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! (Email List Photo Shares)
12. 11:04 AM - Altrak Question (N223RV@aol.com)
13. 11:11 AM - Re: IO-360 Engine problem (Stein Bruch)
14. 11:11 AM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Larry Bowen)
15. 11:13 AM - W&B (Bill VonDane)
16. 11:23 AM - Re: IO-360 Engine problem (Brian Kraut)
17. 11:45 AM - Re: IO-360 Engine problem (Bruce Gray)
18. 12:27 PM - Re: IO-360 Engine problem (Brian Kraut)
19. 12:40 PM - Re: Altrak Question (Stewart, Michael (ISS Atlanta))
20. 12:53 PM - Re: IO-360 Engine problem (Tom Gummo)
21. 12:55 PM - Re: Altrak Question (N67BT@aol.com)
22. 12:56 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Harvey Sigmon)
23. 12:58 PM - Re: hidden pitot tube (Evan and Megan Johnson)
24. 01:00 PM - Re: hidden pitot tube (Jim Oke)
25. 01:12 PM - Re: IO-360 Engine problem (Harvey Sigmon)
26. 01:18 PM - Re: Altrak Question (Harvey Sigmon)
27. 01:53 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (John Danielson)
28. 01:57 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Paul Besing)
29. 02:14 PM - Santa Maria CA Flying (April 30-May 2) (Cory Emberson)
30. 03:02 PM - Re: hidden pitot tube (Evan and Megan Johnson)
31. 03:58 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Jim Jewell)
32. 04:12 PM - Prop pictures (Christopher J Fortin)
33. 04:54 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (SportAV8R@aol.com)
34. 05:30 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Larry Bowen)
35. 05:34 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Larry Bowen)
36. 06:28 PM - Landing lights (Deb and Bernard Weiss)
37. 06:32 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Gary Zilik)
38. 06:51 PM - Re: Altrak Question (Charles Rowbotham)
39. 06:55 PM - Re: Prop pictures (Brian Kraut)
40. 06:58 PM - Re: Dropped bucking bar--Need ding fix (Allen Fulmer)
41. 07:04 PM - Re: hidden pitot tube (Kevin Horton)
42. 07:26 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Bobby Hester)
43. 07:29 PM - Re: hidden pitot tube (jayeandscott)
44. 07:38 PM - Re: RV-List Skidding (David Carter)
45. 07:39 PM - Info on RV8 at LOE (Darwin N. Barrie)
46. 07:59 PM - Re: IO-360 Engine problem (Jason Sneed)
47. 08:02 PM - Rv-List Skidding (smoothweasel@juno.com)
48. 08:38 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Jim Jewell)
49. 09:00 PM - Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets (Jerry Springer)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "Gould, Richard AE1 NAVTESTWINGPAC 561000E" <richard.j.gould@navy.mil>
> Anyone have a lead on a -4 fuse jig in the SF bay area or norcal? Do not
> archive
I have one down here in the Ventura area. I'll be transferring up to WA, and might
be able to bring it with me, but that wouldn't be until October. Or, you can
meet me half-way in the Fresno area in July, and I could bring it with me when
I hit the High Sierras. Email me off-list if interested.
Rick Gould
RV-4 Camarillo, CA
FLY NAVY!
__I__
--O--O--( )--O--O--
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: hidden pitot tube |
--> RV-List message posted by: BrooksRV6@webtv.net (Chris Brooks)
Are you sure the hole is for pitot? The Katana has a hole in the leading
edge for stall indication. The Pitot is a blade under the wing.
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-List Skidding |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Steve Struyk" <rv8striker@hotmail.com>
I think the answer is no, it can not, unless the ball is stuck or not
functioning correctly, but I'm no expert.
You may want to experiment with a yaw string however to get a second opinion
from your turn coordinator. A yaw string is simply a short piece of string
secured on the centerline of your fuselage that is visible from inside. If
the airplane is slipping the string will angle off to the side indicating
the centerline of the plane is not lined up with the slipstream. Just my two
cents worth. Something to try.
Steve Struyk
RV-8, wiring antennas, waiting for avionics.
St. Charles, MO
----- Original Message -----
From: <smoothweasel@juno.com>
Subject: RV-List: RV-List Skidding
> --> RV-List message posted by: smoothweasel@juno.com
>
> Hey Guys, Is it possible to have a plane flying in a skid ( sideways )
> with the turn coordinator ball in the center????
> I have already checked that the instrument was installed level to the
> aircraft. Any ideas??? Fairings out of line????
>
> Weasel Graber
>
>
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-List Skidding |
--> RV-List message posted by: Rob Prior <rv7@b4.ca>
Steve Struyk wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Steve Struyk" <rv8striker@hotmail.com>
> You may want to experiment with a yaw string however to get a second opinion
> from your turn coordinator. A yaw string is simply a short piece of string
> secured on the centerline of your fuselage that is visible from inside. If
> the airplane is slipping the string will angle off to the side indicating
> the centerline of the plane is not lined up with the slipstream. Just my two
> cents worth. Something to try.
Careful where you place it, though... If it's on the deck in front of the
canopy, you could get slipstream effects from the propellor, which would
push it to one side. Also, if it's too close to the canopy, you could get
effects from the stagnation point at the intersection of the canopy and the
deck.
The best place I would suggest would be on the canopy over the rear seat
passenger (far enough back to minimize slipstream yet still be visible).
-Rob P.
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-List Skidding |
--> RV-List message posted by: Hopperdhh@aol.com
In a message dated 3/27/04 10:13:17 AM US Eastern Standard Time, rv7@b4.ca
writes:
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: Rob Prior <rv7@b4.ca>
>
> Steve Struyk wrote:
> >--> RV-List message posted by: "Steve Struyk" <rv8striker@hotmail.com>
> >You may want to experiment with a yaw string however to get a second
> opinion
> >from your turn coordinator. A yaw string is simply a short piece of string
> >secured on the centerline of your fuselage that is visible from inside. If
> >the airplane is slipping the string will angle off to the side indicating
> >the centerline of the plane is not lined up with the slipstream. Just my
> two
> >cents worth. Something to try.
>
> Careful where you place it, though... If it's on the deck in front of the
> canopy, you could get slipstream effects from the propellor, which would
> push it to one side. Also, if it's too close to the canopy, you could get
> effects from the stagnation point at the intersection of the canopy and the
> deck.
>
> The best place I would suggest would be on the canopy over the rear seat
> passenger (far enough back to minimize slipstream yet still be visible).
>
> -Rob P.
>
Rob makes a good point. A yaw string seems pretty simple. There was one on
the T-33s that I worked on back in the 60s. But wait a minute, that was a
jet! I am under the impression that the prop causes the air over the whole
fuselage to rotate, hence the need for vertical stab offset. Uh oh, I hope this
doesn't start anything.
Dan
RV-7A (almost done)
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-List Skidding |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Dean" <dvanwinkle@royell.net>
Steve and Weasel
The yaw string will work fine on a pusher, sailplane, or conventional twin,
but I am very doubtful that it will give a true indication on a tractor due
to the prop swirl effect. Does the turn coordinator have a true ball in a
liquid filled curved glass tube or is it a ball "symbol" hanging from a
pivot shaft in the instrument ?
Dean Van Winkle
RV-9A Fuselage/Finish
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Struyk" <rv8striker@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List: RV-List Skidding
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Steve Struyk" <rv8striker@hotmail.com>
>
> I think the answer is no, it can not, unless the ball is stuck or not
> functioning correctly, but I'm no expert.
>
> You may want to experiment with a yaw string however to get a second
opinion
> from your turn coordinator. A yaw string is simply a short piece of string
> secured on the centerline of your fuselage that is visible from inside. If
> the airplane is slipping the string will angle off to the side indicating
> the centerline of the plane is not lined up with the slipstream. Just my
two
> cents worth. Something to try.
>
> Steve Struyk
> RV-8, wiring antennas, waiting for avionics.
> St. Charles, MO
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <smoothweasel@juno.com>
> To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: RV-List: RV-List Skidding
>
>
> > --> RV-List message posted by: smoothweasel@juno.com
> >
> > Hey Guys, Is it possible to have a plane flying in a skid ( sideways )
> > with the turn coordinator ball in the center????
> > I have already checked that the instrument was installed level to the
> > aircraft. Any ideas??? Fairings out of line????
> >
> > Weasel Graber
> >
> >
>
>
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: "thomas a. sargent" <sarg314@earthlink.net>
I am finally at the point where I can raise and lower a (nearly)
finished tip-up canopy AND can install the seat cushions just delivered
to me from D.J. Lauritsen. (She does nice work, BTW.) I'm very normal
size - about 5' 10" and was surprised at how little room there is
between the top of my head and the canopy. Probably less than 2
inches. I certainly wouldn't want to sit lower than this for visibility
reasons. With D.J.'s booster cushion installed, there's less than an
inch, but I like the visibility. (I remember that Van's tips for
landing an RV advise pilots to sit as high in the saddle as possible.)
This was all done with the seat all the way back, which helps a bit.
I then looked at my old David Clark headset and realized it would
definitely be rubbing against the canopy because the "bridge" piece that
goes across the top of my head is more than an inch thick. The
references in the archives to headroom seem to mostly be from people who
haven't picked which plane to build yet.
So for those of you who are flying, here's the question: Do you use
headsets with very thin bridges? Which ones? Or do you all have
scratches on your canopies above your head?
On the plus side, a low canopy is probably one the reasons these things
go so fast. There's lots of compromises in an airplane design.
--
Tom Sargent, RV-6A, Canopy
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: HCRV6@aol.com
In a message dated 3/26/04 1:37:22 PM Pacific Standard Time,
mbirmham@flightline.com writes:
<< We are about to install a VOR in our RV-6 and we hesitate to cut up the
vertical stab to install the Nav antenna. Has anyone attempted to install it
on the belly? Any other type of antenna available to the experimental market
that might do the job?
Thanks >>
Have you considered the Bob Archer wing tip VOR antenna (installs internally
in the fiberglass wing tips)? All the users reports I have seen are positive
for this unit, check the archives.
Harry Crosby
Pleasanton, California
RV-6, final assembly
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | IO-360 Engine problem |
--> RV-List message posted by: RVEIGHTA@aol.com
All, my IO-360 has begun to run strange at low rpm after it has warmed up. I
noticed this when taxiing into the FBO yesterday - the engine would run
smooth, then it would drop rpm then pick back up again. At any thing above about
1200-1300 rpm the engine is fine.
Any thoughts about what could be the cause? Improper idle mixture adjustment
maybe? The engine should show a slight rise in rpm when the mixture lever is
brought back to idle cutoff, but doesn't, which is an indicator of idle
mixture problem (I think).
Walt Shipley RV-8A 81 hrs
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | [ Rob Ray ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! |
--> RV-List message posted by: Email List Photo Shares <pictures@matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available:
Poster: Rob Ray <smokyray@yahoo.com>
Subject: Backcountry RV4
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/smokyray@yahoo.com.03.27.2004/index.html
o Main Photo Share Index
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
o Submitting a Photo Share
If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the
following information along with your email message and files:
1) Email List or Lists that they are related to:
2) Your Full Name:
3) Your Email Address:
4) One line Subject description:
5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic:
6) One-line Description of each photo or file:
Email the information above and your files and photos to:
pictures@matronics.com
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | [ Rob Ray ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! |
--> RV-List message posted by: Email List Photo Shares <pictures@matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available:
Poster: Rob Ray <smokyray@yahoo.com>
Subject: Two Best RV's...
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/smokyray@yahoo.com.1.03.27.2004/index.html
o Main Photo Share Index
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
o Submitting a Photo Share
If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the
following information along with your email message and files:
1) Email List or Lists that they are related to:
2) Your Full Name:
3) Your Email Address:
4) One line Subject description:
5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic:
6) One-line Description of each photo or file:
Email the information above and your files and photos to:
pictures@matronics.com
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: N223RV@aol.com
For those flying with an Altrak:
Did you hook the module into the static system or did you just leave it open?
The manufacturer directions indicate it can be done either way and I'm
looking for what other people are doing.
Thanks!
-Mike Kraus
N223RV RV-4 Flying
N213RV RV-10 Empennage
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | IO-360 Engine problem |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com>
Hi Walt,
Just a quick thought....have you flown your plane during the "warmer"
months? I'm not bein sarcastic, the only reason ask this, is that nicely
warmed up and hot IO's (on warm days) can have a tendency to run rough at
low RPM's due to the fuel boiling before it reaches the injector. This
usually only happens with low fuel flow and goes away at higher RPM's and
Fuel flows becuase their is cooler fuel to the injectors and more air moving
through the cowling.
At first glance I wouldn't worry, but I'd make sure you have firesleeve on
all the fuel lines, especially the line from the servo to the spider (that
will help), and the line from the engine driven pump to the servo covered in
firesleeve also.
Just my 2 cents, but I notice this phenomenon (IO-360) also during the
warmer summer months.
Cheers,
Stein Bruch
RV6's, Minneapolis.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of RVEIGHTA@aol.com
Subject: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
--> RV-List message posted by: RVEIGHTA@aol.com
All, my IO-360 has begun to run strange at low rpm after it has warmed up. I
noticed this when taxiing into the FBO yesterday - the engine would run
smooth, then it would drop rpm then pick back up again. At any thing above
about
1200-1300 rpm the engine is fine.
Any thoughts about what could be the cause? Improper idle mixture
adjustment
maybe? The engine should show a slight rise in rpm when the mixture lever
is
brought back to idle cutoff, but doesn't, which is an indicator of idle
mixture problem (I think).
Walt Shipley RV-8A 81 hrs
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
I use these.
http://www.quiettechnologies.com/index_002.htm
Bridge thickness: 0"
-
Larry Bowen, RV-8 FWF
Larry@BowenAero.com
http://BowenAero.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thomas a. sargent [mailto:sarg314@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:09 PM
> To: rv-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV-List: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets
>
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: "thomas a. sargent"
> --> <sarg314@earthlink.net>
>
> I am finally at the point where I can raise and lower a (nearly)
> finished tip-up canopy AND can install the seat cushions just
> delivered
> to me from D.J. Lauritsen. (She does nice work, BTW.) I'm
> very normal
> size - about 5' 10" and was surprised at how little room there is
> between the top of my head and the canopy. Probably less than 2
> inches. I certainly wouldn't want to sit lower than this for
> visibility
> reasons. With D.J.'s booster cushion installed, there's less than an
> inch, but I like the visibility. (I remember that Van's tips for
> landing an RV advise pilots to sit as high in the saddle as
> possible.)
> This was all done with the seat all the way back, which helps a bit.
>
> I then looked at my old David Clark headset and realized it would
> definitely be rubbing against the canopy because the "bridge"
> piece that
> goes across the top of my head is more than an inch thick. The
> references in the archives to headroom seem to mostly be from
> people who
> haven't picked which plane to build yet.
>
> So for those of you who are flying, here's the question: Do you use
> headsets with very thin bridges? Which ones? Or do you all have
> scratches on your canopies above your head?
>
> On the plus side, a low canopy is probably one the reasons
> these things
> go so fast. There's lots of compromises in an airplane design.
>
> --
> Tom Sargent, RV-6A, Canopy
>
>
> ============
> Matronics Forums.
> ============
> ============
> ============
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
vansairforce <vansairforce@yahoogroups.com>
--> RV-List message posted by: Bill VonDane <bill@vondane.com>
Hi all...
I decided to weigh my -8A again after the upgrades I just did... When I
weighed it after I built it I had some temporary seats installed, and did
not have the wheel pants and gear leg fairing fairings installed.....here's
what I got:
Empty weight without wheel pants and fairings: 996 lbs
Empty weight with wheel pants and fairings sitting on the wings and cowl:
1005 lbs
After a year and a half and the upgrades:
Empty weight now with interior, all fairings, new panel, and heavy starter:
1029 lbs
Still pretty light I think!
I am going to be install new "H" pistons in the next couple weeks, along
with a light weight starter. I am going to weight everything and redo the
W&B accordingly and will post the results...
-Bill VonDane
EAA Tech Counselor
RV-8A ~ N8WV ~ Colorado Springs
www.vondane.com
www.creativair.com
www.epanelbuilder.com
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | IO-360 Engine problem |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Brian Kraut" <brian.kraut@engalt.com>
Applying carb heat will richen the mixture a little. Sounds like you may be
a little lean on the idle mixture so a quick and easy way to verify that
would be to put on the carb heat and see if that improves things.
Brian Kraut
Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
www.engalt.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of RVEIGHTA@aol.com
Subject: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
--> RV-List message posted by: RVEIGHTA@aol.com
All, my IO-360 has begun to run strange at low rpm after it has warmed up. I
noticed this when taxiing into the FBO yesterday - the engine would run
smooth, then it would drop rpm then pick back up again. At any thing above
about
1200-1300 rpm the engine is fine.
Any thoughts about what could be the cause? Improper idle mixture
adjustment
maybe? The engine should show a slight rise in rpm when the mixture lever
is
brought back to idle cutoff, but doesn't, which is an indicator of idle
mixture problem (I think).
Walt Shipley RV-8A 81 hrs
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | IO-360 Engine problem |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Bruce Gray" <Bruce@glasair.org>
Injected engines don't have carb heat, they have an alternate air
supply.
Bruce
www.glasair.org
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brian Kraut
Subject: RE: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
--> RV-List message posted by: "Brian Kraut" <brian.kraut@engalt.com>
Applying carb heat will richen the mixture a little. Sounds like you
may be
a little lean on the idle mixture so a quick and easy way to verify that
would be to put on the carb heat and see if that improves things.
Brian Kraut
Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
www.engalt.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of RVEIGHTA@aol.com
Subject: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
--> RV-List message posted by: RVEIGHTA@aol.com
All, my IO-360 has begun to run strange at low rpm after it has warmed
up. I
noticed this when taxiing into the FBO yesterday - the engine would run
smooth, then it would drop rpm then pick back up again. At any thing
above
about
1200-1300 rpm the engine is fine.
Any thoughts about what could be the cause? Improper idle mixture
adjustment
maybe? The engine should show a slight rise in rpm when the mixture
lever
is
brought back to idle cutoff, but doesn't, which is an indicator of idle
mixture problem (I think).
Walt Shipley RV-8A 81 hrs
==
==
==
==
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | IO-360 Engine problem |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Brian Kraut" <brian.kraut@engalt.com>
Good point. Well, it would have a a quick and easy way to check the mixture
if it had a carb!
Brian Kraut
Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
www.engalt.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bruce Gray
Subject: RE: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
--> RV-List message posted by: "Bruce Gray" <Bruce@glasair.org>
Injected engines don't have carb heat, they have an alternate air
supply.
Bruce
www.glasair.org
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brian Kraut
Subject: RE: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
--> RV-List message posted by: "Brian Kraut" <brian.kraut@engalt.com>
Applying carb heat will richen the mixture a little. Sounds like you
may be
a little lean on the idle mixture so a quick and easy way to verify that
would be to put on the carb heat and see if that improves things.
Brian Kraut
Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
www.engalt.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of RVEIGHTA@aol.com
Subject: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
--> RV-List message posted by: RVEIGHTA@aol.com
All, my IO-360 has begun to run strange at low rpm after it has warmed
up. I
noticed this when taxiing into the FBO yesterday - the engine would run
smooth, then it would drop rpm then pick back up again. At any thing
above
about
1200-1300 rpm the engine is fine.
Any thoughts about what could be the cause? Improper idle mixture
adjustment
maybe? The engine should show a slight rise in rpm when the mixture
lever
is
brought back to idle cutoff, but doesn't, which is an indicator of idle
mixture problem (I think).
Walt Shipley RV-8A 81 hrs
==
==
==
==
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "Stewart, Michael (ISS Atlanta)" <mstewart@iss.net>
I hooked mine up to ships static.
In hind site, I would not.
I have had my static get water in it in heavy rain and clog the system.
Delivering erroneous results while IFR. Yuk!. Has happened to me twice
and neither time was any fun partial panel woth static blocked with a
drop of water.
I have since installed a quick pull device to vent ships static to the
cockpit. My fix on that is in the archives. Simple I have a small piece
of r/c fuel line with an r/c bulkhead fitting, 1/8 inch. Through the
panel. When I want an alternate static, pull it off and presto, venting
to cabin.
But I do not think there is any up side to connecting the Altrak to
ships static.
There is a down side to doing so as my experience dictates.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of N223RV@aol.com
Subject: RV-List: Altrak Question
--> RV-List message posted by: N223RV@aol.com
For those flying with an Altrak:
Did you hook the module into the static system or did you just leave it
open?
The manufacturer directions indicate it can be done either way and I'm
looking for what other people are doing.
Thanks!
-Mike Kraus
N223RV RV-4 Flying
N213RV RV-10 Empennage
==
==
==
==
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: IO-360 Engine problem |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Tom Gummo" <T.gummo@verizon.net>
Before, I worked out most of the heat issues on my plane. It would
sometimes run rough and even quit once during the taxi back. Now when I
hear the first hint of roughness, I turn on the electric fuel pump and the
additional pressure seems to keep enough pressure inside the fuel lines so
that they don't "vapor lock". It is worth a try. Good luck.
Tom Gummo
Apple Valley, CA
Harmon Rocket-II
do not archive
http://mysite.verizon.net/t.gummo/index.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com>
Subject: RE: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com>
>
> Hi Walt,
>
> Just a quick thought....have you flown your plane during the "warmer"
> months? I'm not bein sarcastic, the only reason ask this, is that nicely
> warmed up and hot IO's (on warm days) can have a tendency to run rough at
> low RPM's due to the fuel boiling before it reaches the injector. This
> usually only happens with low fuel flow and goes away at higher RPM's and
> Fuel flows becuase their is cooler fuel to the injectors and more air
moving
> through the cowling.
>
> At first glance I wouldn't worry, but I'd make sure you have firesleeve on
> all the fuel lines, especially the line from the servo to the spider (that
> will help), and the line from the engine driven pump to the servo covered
in
> firesleeve also.
>
> Just my 2 cents, but I notice this phenomenon (IO-360) also during the
> warmer summer months.
>
> Cheers,
> Stein Bruch
> RV6's, Minneapolis.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of RVEIGHTA@aol.com
> To: rv-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
>
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: RVEIGHTA@aol.com
>
> All, my IO-360 has begun to run strange at low rpm after it has warmed up.
I
> noticed this when taxiing into the FBO yesterday - the engine would run
> smooth, then it would drop rpm then pick back up again. At any thing above
> about
> 1200-1300 rpm the engine is fine.
>
> Any thoughts about what could be the cause? Improper idle mixture
> adjustment
> maybe? The engine should show a slight rise in rpm when the mixture lever
> is
> brought back to idle cutoff, but doesn't, which is an indicator of idle
> mixture problem (I think).
>
> Walt Shipley RV-8A 81 hrs
>
>
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Altrak Question |
--> RV-List message posted by: N67BT@aol.com
<For those flying with an Altrak:
Did you hook the module into the static system or did you just leave it open?
The manufacturer directions indicate it can be done either way and I'm
looking for what other people are doing.
Mike Kraus>
I asked the folks at TruTrak about this and they said that the accuracy is
better with the static connected. As I recall the difference was plus or minus
20 feet. I could be off there.
Bob Trumpfheller
RV7A
http://users.aol.com/n67bt (baggage compartment update)
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Harvey Sigmon" <rv6hes@comcast.net>
Tom: I will give you my humble opinion on canopy clearance. Background
information on myself, I am 6'4" a Bubba size frame, tall in the waist
flying a RV-6, my first RV-6 was a tip up canopy, my solution was use the
back hinge position and do not use the seatback upper securing attachment,
let the back of the seat rest on the cross channel. By doing this it gives
you a slightly recline position and for me that give about 1" clearance
using a David Clark headset. I did not notice and rubbing of canopy, but in
turburelent air you must keep the shoulder Harness snug or the head could
hit canopy. On my present RV-6A with a sliding canopy I have about the
same clearance as the tip up but it seems the seat back is slightly forward,
not as comfortable as the tip up position. The seat cushion is the normal
1" temple foam, but the back rest has minimum thickness. with your height
it should be a piece of cake, but you might need to shop for a head set that
does not have such a thick headband.
Harvey Sigmon RV-6A N602RV
----- Original Message -----
From: "thomas a. sargent" <sarg314@earthlink.net>
Subject: RV-List: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets
> --> RV-List message posted by: "thomas a. sargent" <sarg314@earthlink.net>
>
> I am finally at the point where I can raise and lower a (nearly)
> finished tip-up canopy AND can install the seat cushions just delivered
> to me from D.J. Lauritsen. (She does nice work, BTW.) I'm very normal
> size - about 5' 10" and was surprised at how little room there is
> between the top of my head and the canopy. Probably less than 2
> inches. I certainly wouldn't want to sit lower than this for visibility
> reasons. With D.J.'s booster cushion installed, there's less than an
> inch, but I like the visibility. (I remember that Van's tips for
> landing an RV advise pilots to sit as high in the saddle as possible.)
> This was all done with the seat all the way back, which helps a bit.
>
> I then looked at my old David Clark headset and realized it would
> definitely be rubbing against the canopy because the "bridge" piece that
> goes across the top of my head is more than an inch thick. The
> references in the archives to headroom seem to mostly be from people who
> haven't picked which plane to build yet.
>
> So for those of you who are flying, here's the question: Do you use
> headsets with very thin bridges? Which ones? Or do you all have
> scratches on your canopies above your head?
>
> On the plus side, a low canopy is probably one the reasons these things
> go so fast. There's lots of compromises in an airplane design.
>
> --
> Tom Sargent, RV-6A, Canopy
>
>
Message 23
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: hidden pitot tube |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Evan and Megan Johnson" <evmeg@snowcrest.net>
Ooops.....you are right. I just took a quick look and missed it because my
friend who pointed it out is an A&P. I took a second, longer look this
morning and it does indeed have a blade pitot. Sorry for the misinformation.
I still think it would be cool though :)
Evan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Brooks" <BrooksRV6@webtv.net>
Subject: Re: RV-List: hidden pitot tube
> --> RV-List message posted by: BrooksRV6@webtv.net (Chris Brooks)
>
> Are you sure the hole is for pitot? The Katana has a hole in the leading
> edge for stall indication. The Pitot is a blade under the wing.
>
>
Message 24
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: hidden pitot tube |
--> RV-List message posted by: Jim Oke <wjoke@shaw.ca>
The placement of the pitot tube in the flow field around the airplane should
not matter much. According to theory, any local increase in the velocity of
the air (due to the shape of the wing, for instance) will cause a
equivalent decrease in local static pressure so the total (static plus
dynamic) pressure will remain unchanged. If this is compared to an accurate
static pressure source, the difference is then dynamic pressure which is
then fed to an ASI or whatever to show an airspeed indication.
The reason for the long, skinny, forward-projecting pitot tubes on some
aircraft is to move the static vents on the pitot head clear of the flow
field and get an accurate static pressure reading. If the static pressure is
sensed elsewhere, then no need for this. Look at an F-86 sometime, the pitot
tube is buried inside the engine intake duct and works fine (some models
anyway).
Jim Oke
RV-3, RV-6A
Wpg, MB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Evan and Megan Johnson" <evmeg@snowcrest.net>
Subject: RV-List: hidden pitot tube
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Evan and Megan Johnson"
<evmeg@snowcrest.net>
>
> A question for those of you in the know....I was looking at a Diamond
aircraft this morning and a friend pointed out that the pitot tube is
completly hidden in the leading edge of the wing...just a 1/4 hole!? Can
this be done on an RV wing? It would be cool to have no pitot sticking out
in the wind, but I dont know if the front of the leading edge is undisturbed
air. It certainly is as it passes over the leading edge. Instinct tells me
that the air pressure would be changed right at the leading edge and the
airspeed readings would be inaccurate....but Diamond does it. Hmmmmmm any
thoughts?
> Thanks ...Evan
>
>
Message 25
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: IO-360 Engine problem |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Harvey Sigmon" <rv6hes@comcast.net>
Walt: A leak in the intake manifold will make it run irregular at low
speeds, also clogged fuel nozzles will sometimes cause the engine to run
irregular. As you noticed above 1200 the fuel schedule is more consistent,
and most fuel injected engines the fuel servo meters much better above idle.
Check fuel pressure, clean fuel nozzles and maybe even clean main fuel
screen if it is a Bendix Servo. As some listers have said if the engine is
hot after starting they will run irregular until you get clean fuel to the
engine. My view only hope this helps.
Harvey Sigmon Do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: <RVEIGHTA@aol.com>
Subject: RV-List: IO-360 Engine problem
> --> RV-List message posted by: RVEIGHTA@aol.com
>
> All, my IO-360 has begun to run strange at low rpm after it has warmed up.
I
> noticed this when taxiing into the FBO yesterday - the engine would run
> smooth, then it would drop rpm then pick back up again. At any thing above
about
> 1200-1300 rpm the engine is fine.
>
> Any thoughts about what could be the cause? Improper idle mixture
adjustment
> maybe? The engine should show a slight rise in rpm when the mixture lever
is
> brought back to idle cutoff, but doesn't, which is an indicator of idle
> mixture problem (I think).
>
> Walt Shipley RV-8A 81 hrs
>
>
Message 26
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Altrak Question |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Harvey Sigmon" <rv6hes@comcast.net>
Mike: On my RV-6A I mounted my Altrak controller in the aft tailcone close
to the servo and left it open to the static air, works fine but caution when
the cabin heat is pulled on as the controller senses the change. If you
plan on using the A/C for IFR they recommended to hock to static system.
Harvey Sigmon RV-6A N602RV
----- Original Message -----
From: <N223RV@aol.com>
Subject: RV-List: Altrak Question
> --> RV-List message posted by: N223RV@aol.com
>
> For those flying with an Altrak:
>
> Did you hook the module into the static system or did you just leave it
open?
> The manufacturer directions indicate it can be done either way and I'm
> looking for what other people are doing.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Mike Kraus
> N223RV RV-4 Flying
> N213RV RV-10 Empennage
>
>
Message 27
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: "John Danielson" <Jdaniel343@bresnan.net>
I am 5'6". I also have DJ seats with the booster and the child cushion. At
first I only used the booster, but was not making the best landings. I then
tried the child booster cushion and my landings greatly improved.
I still have about 1" clearance between my head and the canopy. I have
bumped my head 2 or 3 times in very turbulent air. Really not too much of a
problem in the seatbelt and harnesses are sinched down.
Van is correct in assesment of sitting a tall as possible.
John Danielson
Message 28
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Paul Besing" <azpilot@extremezone.com>
Bose headsets have a very thin bridge, and are worth every penny IMHO.
Paul Besing
RV-6A Sold
RV-10 Soon
http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing
Kitlog Pro Builder's Log Software
http://www.kitlog.com
do not archive
Message 29
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Santa Maria CA Flying (April 30-May 2) |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Cory Emberson" <bootless@earthlink.net>
Hello everyone!
With Matt Dralle's blessing (thank you, Matt!), I'm pleased to post this announcement
for a terrific aviation fly-in weekend. SMXgig (in Santa Maria, CA) has
become the year's largest face-to-face get-together of electronically networked
aviators. We hope you'll plan to attend because we expect this year's gig to
be the best ever.
People come from all over the country (and sometimes overseas) to attend, and most of the sessions qualify for FAA Wings cards. The dates are 4/30-5/2/04 (Friday-Sunday) - it's a lot of fun, and a great chance for pilots from all over to mingle and share aviation stories, ideas, etc. The announcement below contains most of the crucial information, and you can get the rest from the website (www.smxgig.org). If you have any questions at all, just let me know, and thanks!
~~Cory Emberson
KHWD
>>> NOTICE TO AIRMEN! <<<
Announcing the Sixteenth Annual SMXgig
to be held on April 30 - May 2, 2004
at the Radisson on the Santa Maria (CA) Airport (aka SMX)
www.smxgig.org
SMXgig will be April 30 - May 2, 2004, at the Santa Maria Radisson. This year,
our featured speaker after Friday night's dinner will be Rod Machado!
"MACH 2 WITH MACHADO" is the byline Rod Machado has earned for his rapid fire delivery
at his lively safety seminars and keynote speeches. His programs are information-packed,
energetic, and humorous. He has spoken in all fifty of the
United States and in Europe sharing his fresh approach to aviation education.
If you can make it, please do. It's going to be pretty special. More information and the announcement/ registration info is available at www.smxgig.org You may also contact me by email at: cory@smxgig.org.
All technical sessions will be held in the Enterprise Ballroom at the SMX Radisson.
Each session will last about an hour. We schedule four tech sessions on Saturday
morning, and four on Sunday morning. Most of the speakers are set (I'm
still firming up a couple of slots - I'm working on a session about Experimentals):
MIKE BUSCH - The Art and Science of Troubleshooting
Your A frequently, that person is you. That's particularly true of problems that
occur only in-flight and/or are intermittent. This session offers methodology
for troubleshooting aimed at aircraft owners who aren't A&Ps.
ED WILLIAMS - GPS - How It Works, and How to Work It
Ed is a nuclear physicist working at Lawrence Livermore Labs. Ed does a
remarkable job of making physics phun!
BRENT BLUE, M.D. - Pilot Medicals: How to Avoid Problems with the FAA
Brent is an AME Advocate, who specializes in helping the tough cases renew their
medicals. He's a former member of EAA's medical advisory committee.
DOUG RITTER - Equipping Yourself To Survive - Personal Survival Gear for Pilots
Doug is a survival evangelist, personally driven to help pilots live through whatever comes next. www.equipped.org
PAUL MILLNER - The Future of Avgas
Paul works with ChevronTexaco, and is right in the middle of the industry developments
regarding our fuel of choice.
MARY DUFFY & UWE LEMKE - Flying in Europe
Mary and Uwe are a Scot and a German who live in the San Francisco Bay Area, but
return "home" often.
As always, each qualifying session will get you a WINGS Safety Session card.
Our Saturday evening event should be a delicious one! At 5:45 p.m., the BFUB (Big Fat Ugly Bus) will arrive at the Santa Maria Radisson to bring us to the Far Western Tavern for dinner in beautiful Guadalupe (www.farwesterntavern.com).
DOLLARS AND CENTS
Just as in previous years, there will be one flat all-encompassing "gig" fee that
covers all events that involve significant out-of-pocket costs for the organizers.
The fee is $160 per person, and will cover:
- Friday afternoon welcome party
- Friday evening dinner banquet
- Saturday and Sunday tech sessions
- Saturday afternoon lunch
- Saturday evening dinner at the Far Western Tavern in Guadalupe
- Meeting rooms and coffee service at the Santa Maria Radisson
- Transportation to (and from) the Far Western Tavern
Lodging at the SMX Radisson will cost $89.00/night for either a single or double
room, which is far below the regular hotel room rate. Be sure you check in as
a SMXgig attendee and get the special rate. We have our definitive preference
listed with the hotel for rampside rooms - early registration can only help,
but of course, the rampside rooms are subject to availability depending on how
many existing guests are in those rooms.
You do not need to register with the hotel - just give me your preferences, and
I will take care of the reservations.
Important: This year, our final rooming lists are due to the hotel on April 11,
2004 (the even of Sun 'n Fun), which will guarantee space and the group rate.
The hotel will accept additional room reservations after that, on a space- and
rate-available basis. They will try their best to accommodate us after that
date, but the hotel is already sold out for the weekend.
The website (www.smxgig.org) has detailed information about the schedule, meals, hotel accommodations, and online registration. If you'd like your own announcement/registration emailed to you, or have any other questions, just let me know. (cory@smxgig.org or bootless@earthlink.net ).
Thanks, and see you there!
best, Cory Emberson
Message 30
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: hidden pitot tube |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Evan and Megan Johnson" <evmeg@snowcrest.net>
Ok, so if I understand correctly, a hidden pitot with the front flush with
the leading edge and a static source on the side of the fuselage should work
just fine. (All theory of course) So the next question would be....if I
figure out how to heat the pitot with an element like the one in my standard
heated pitot.....is this a problem in a confined space? We are no longer in
200 mph wind. How are these things thermally regulated?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Oke" <wjoke@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: RV-List: hidden pitot tube
> --> RV-List message posted by: Jim Oke <wjoke@shaw.ca>
>
> The placement of the pitot tube in the flow field around the airplane
should
> not matter much. According to theory, any local increase in the velocity
of
> the air (due to the shape of the wing, for instance) will cause a
> equivalent decrease in local static pressure so the total (static plus
> dynamic) pressure will remain unchanged. If this is compared to an
accurate
> static pressure source, the difference is then dynamic pressure which is
> then fed to an ASI or whatever to show an airspeed indication.
>
> The reason for the long, skinny, forward-projecting pitot tubes on some
> aircraft is to move the static vents on the pitot head clear of the flow
> field and get an accurate static pressure reading. If the static pressure
is
> sensed elsewhere, then no need for this. Look at an F-86 sometime, the
pitot
> tube is buried inside the engine intake duct and works fine (some models
> anyway).
>
> Jim Oke
> RV-3, RV-6A
> Wpg, MB
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Evan and Megan Johnson" <evmeg@snowcrest.net>
> To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: RV-List: hidden pitot tube
>
>
> > --> RV-List message posted by: "Evan and Megan Johnson"
> <evmeg@snowcrest.net>
> >
> > A question for those of you in the know....I was looking at a Diamond
> aircraft this morning and a friend pointed out that the pitot tube is
> completly hidden in the leading edge of the wing...just a 1/4 hole!? Can
> this be done on an RV wing? It would be cool to have no pitot sticking out
> in the wind, but I dont know if the front of the leading edge is
undisturbed
> air. It certainly is as it passes over the leading edge. Instinct tells me
> that the air pressure would be changed right at the leading edge and the
> airspeed readings would be inaccurate....but Diamond does it. Hmmmmmm any
> thoughts?
> > Thanks ...Evan
> >
> >
>
>
Message 31
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Jewell" <jjewell@telus.net>
Hi Larry,
If asked, Would you be inclined to describe them a bit more and offer a
performance aand product evaluation opinion?
I am asking. {[;-)!
Jim in Kelowna
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@bowenaero.com>
Subject: RE: RV-List: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
>
> I use these.
>
> http://www.quiettechnologies.com/index_002.htm
>
> Bridge thickness: 0"
>
> -
> Larry Bowen, RV-8 FWF
> Larry@BowenAero.com
> http://BowenAero.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: thomas a. sargent [mailto:sarg314@earthlink.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:09 PM
> > To: rv-list@matronics.com
> > Subject: RV-List: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets
> >
> >
> > --> RV-List message posted by: "thomas a. sargent"
> > --> <sarg314@earthlink.net>
> >
> > I am finally at the point where I can raise and lower a (nearly)
> > finished tip-up canopy AND can install the seat cushions just
> > delivered
> > to me from D.J. Lauritsen. (She does nice work, BTW.) I'm
> > very normal
> > size - about 5' 10" and was surprised at how little room there is
> > between the top of my head and the canopy. Probably less than 2
> > inches. I certainly wouldn't want to sit lower than this for
> > visibility
> > reasons. With D.J.'s booster cushion installed, there's less than an
> > inch, but I like the visibility. (I remember that Van's tips for
> > landing an RV advise pilots to sit as high in the saddle as
> > possible.)
> > This was all done with the seat all the way back, which helps a bit.
> >
> > I then looked at my old David Clark headset and realized it would
> > definitely be rubbing against the canopy because the "bridge"
> > piece that
> > goes across the top of my head is more than an inch thick. The
> > references in the archives to headroom seem to mostly be from
> > people who
> > haven't picked which plane to build yet.
> >
> > So for those of you who are flying, here's the question: Do you use
> > headsets with very thin bridges? Which ones? Or do you all have
> > scratches on your canopies above your head?
> >
> > On the plus side, a low canopy is probably one the reasons
> > these things
> > go so fast. There's lots of compromises in an airplane design.
> >
> > --
> > Tom Sargent, RV-6A, Canopy
> >
> >
> > ============
> > Matronics Forums.
> > ============
> > ============
> > ============
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Message 32
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: Christopher J Fortin <cjfortin@juno.com>
Hi All,
Does anyone have a picture of a Ed Sterba race profile style prop?
Contact me off list at cjfortin@juno.com.
Thanks,
Chris Fortin
N813CJ reserved
Do not archive
Message 33
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: SportAV8R@aol.com
To answer the original poster, yes, at 5' 9" it is a problem, and I do have the
aforementioned scratches all over the inside of the canopy, over my head and
the passenger's head. It's not an area of the plexi you look through very often,
maybe during a roll if you want to get woozy, but it is noticeable when looking
in from outside on the ground. I have Lightspeeds, which have a very thick
padded headband.
I'm very interested to hear what Larry says about product performance with the
in-ear headset he uses, in particular boom mike stability issues. I have had
the Lightspeeds come off my noggin when pulling G in a turn and leaning my head
back to look for the guy I'm dogfighting. Has happened several times in fact,
So I am curious how well an ear spud can stabilize a boom mic in the aircraft
environment.
-Bill B
<<I am 5'6". I also have DJ seats with the booster and the child cushion. At
first I only used the booster, but was not making the best landings. I then
tried the child booster cushion and my landings greatly improved.
I still have about 1" clearance between my head and the canopy. I have
bumped my head 2 or 3 times in very turbulent air. Really not too much of a
problem in the seatbelt and harnesses are sinched down.
Van is correct in assesment of sitting a tall as possible.
John Danielson>>
Message 34
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
I got mine last year at OSH, $325 I think? Stereo. They perform well
and are very comfortable. As if I'm wearing nothing at all....on my
head, that is. I have the generic foam plugs. You can get custom ear
molds too.
On the downside, they are a little tricky to get positioned exactly
right-- the placement in the ear determines where the mic boom ends up.
Sometimes the mic is just right, other times I have to try again. They
can also be pulled out of adjustment if I turn my head far and the cord
catches on your collar, for example. But these are minor annoyances,
IMO. I like 'em. They are the only headset I've used since OSH last
year (but I still have my David Clark's too).
-
Larry Bowen
Larry@BowenAero.com
http://BowenAero.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jewell [mailto:jjewell@telus.net]
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:55 PM
> To: rv-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: RV-List: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets
>
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Jewell" <jjewell@telus.net>
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> If asked, Would you be inclined to describe them a bit more
> and offer a performance aand product evaluation opinion? I am
> asking. {[;-)!
>
> Jim in Kelowna
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@bowenaero.com>
> To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: RE: RV-List: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets
>
>
> > --> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
> >
> > I use these.
> >
> > http://www.quiettechnologies.com/index_002.htm
> >
> > Bridge thickness: 0"
> >
> > -
> > Larry Bowen, RV-8 FWF
> > Larry@BowenAero.com
> > http://BowenAero.com
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: thomas a. sargent [mailto:sarg314@earthlink.net]
> > > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:09 PM
> > > To: rv-list@matronics.com
> > > Subject: RV-List: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets
> > >
> > >
> > > --> RV-List message posted by: "thomas a. sargent"
> > > --> <sarg314@earthlink.net>
> > >
> > > I am finally at the point where I can raise and lower a (nearly)
> > > finished tip-up canopy AND can install the seat cushions just
> > > delivered to me from D.J. Lauritsen. (She does nice
> work, BTW.) I'm
> > > very normal
> > > size - about 5' 10" and was surprised at how little room there is
> > > between the top of my head and the canopy. Probably less than 2
> > > inches. I certainly wouldn't want to sit lower than this for
> > > visibility
> > > reasons. With D.J.'s booster cushion installed, there's
> less than an
> > > inch, but I like the visibility. (I remember that Van's tips for
> > > landing an RV advise pilots to sit as high in the saddle as
> > > possible.)
> > > This was all done with the seat all the way back, which
> helps a bit.
> > >
> > > I then looked at my old David Clark headset and realized it would
> > > definitely be rubbing against the canopy because the
> "bridge" piece
> > > that
> > > goes across the top of my head is more than an inch thick. The
> > > references in the archives to headroom seem to mostly be
> from people
> > > who haven't picked which plane to build yet.
> > >
> > > So for those of you who are flying, here's the question:
> Do you use
> > > headsets with very thin bridges? Which ones? Or do you all have
> > > scratches on your canopies above your head?
> > >
> > > On the plus side, a low canopy is probably one the reasons these
> > > things go so fast. There's lots of compromises in an airplane
> > > design.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tom Sargent, RV-6A, Canopy
Message 35
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
The in-your-ear headsets may have issues in a dog-fight type scenario.
Lots of extreme head movement and big G's will like take it out of
'alignment'. But for more sedate flying and hours of cross-country,
they are perfect.
-
Larry Bowen
Larry@BowenAero.com
http://BowenAero.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SportAV8R@aol.com [mailto:SportAV8R@aol.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 7:54 PM
> To: rv-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: RV-List: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets
>
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: SportAV8R@aol.com
>
> To answer the original poster, yes, at 5' 9" it is a problem,
> and I do have the aforementioned scratches all over the
> inside of the canopy, over my head and the passenger's head.
> It's not an area of the plexi you look through very often,
> maybe during a roll if you want to get woozy, but it is
> noticeable when looking in from outside on the ground. I
> have Lightspeeds, which have a very thick padded headband.
>
> I'm very interested to hear what Larry says about product
> performance with the in-ear headset he uses, in particular
> boom mike stability issues. I have had the Lightspeeds come
> off my noggin when pulling G in a turn and leaning my head
> back to look for the guy I'm dogfighting. Has happened
> several times in fact, So I am curious how well an ear spud
> can stabilize a boom mic in the aircraft environment.
>
> -Bill B
>
> <<I am 5'6". I also have DJ seats with the booster and the
> child cushion. At first I only used the booster, but was not
> making the best landings. I then tried the child booster
> cushion and my landings greatly improved. I still have about
> 1" clearance between my head and the canopy. I have bumped my
> head 2 or 3 times in very turbulent air. Really not too much
> of a problem in the seatbelt and harnesses are sinched down.
> Van is correct in assesment of sitting a tall as possible.
> John Danielson>>
>
>
> ============
> Matronics Forums.
> ============
> ============
> ============
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 36
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "Deb and Bernard Weiss" <weissmntc@earthlink.net>
I am interested in options for landing lights that will fit inside the new tips
that Van's is selling with the RV-7. Also to be included in the lens will be
the strobes.
DebBernie Weiss
weissmntc@earthlink.net
Why Wait? Move to EarthLink.
Message 37
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: Gary Zilik <zilik@direcpc.com>
I've had my seat belt and shoulder harness as tight as possible and hit
bumps in my slider 6a and wondered why the canopy did not break. A word
to the wise; remove the button from the top of your ball cap, it will
save your scull.
Z
John Danielson wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: "John Danielson" <Jdaniel343@bresnan.net>
>
>I am 5'6". I also have DJ seats with the booster and the child cushion. At
>first I only used the booster, but was not making the best landings. I then
>tried the child booster cushion and my landings greatly improved.
>I still have about 1" clearance between my head and the canopy. I have
>bumped my head 2 or 3 times in very turbulent air. Really not too much of a
>problem in the seatbelt and harnesses are sinched down.
>Van is correct in assesment of sitting a tall as possible.
>John Danielson
>
>
>
>
Message 38
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham@hotmail.com>
Mike,
We left it open - works great.
Chuck & Dave Rowbotham
RV-8A
>From: N223RV@aol.com
>Reply-To: rv-list@matronics.com
>To: rv-list@matronics.com, vansairforce@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RV-List: Altrak Question
>Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:01:51 EST
>
>--> RV-List message posted by: N223RV@aol.com
>
>For those flying with an Altrak:
>
>Did you hook the module into the static system or did you just leave it
>open?
> The manufacturer directions indicate it can be done either way and I'm
>looking for what other people are doing.
>
>Thanks!
>
>-Mike Kraus
>N223RV RV-4 Flying
>N213RV RV-10 Empennage
>
>
http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
Message 39
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV-List message posted by: "Brian Kraut" <brian.kraut@engalt.com>
I don't have a picture, but I can tell you that mine was absolutely
beautiful and the quality and service from Ed is top notch. I have called
Ed on the weekends before. If you call him tomorrow I bet he has some
pictures he can send you.
I had mine done with alternating laminations of cherry and maple, or was it
cherry and birch? It really added a lot to the appearance and didn't cost
any more.
Brian Kraut
Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
www.engalt.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Christopher J
Fortin
Subject: RV-List: Prop pictures
--> RV-List message posted by: Christopher J Fortin <cjfortin@juno.com>
Hi All,
Does anyone have a picture of a Ed Sterba race profile style prop?
Contact me off list at cjfortin@juno.com.
Thanks,
Chris Fortin
N813CJ reserved
Do not archive
Message 40
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Dropped bucking bar--Need ding fix |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Allen Fulmer" <afulmer@charter.net>
Nothing on Miracle Fill in the archives. Details please!
Allen Fulmer
--> RV-List message posted by: "John" <n1cxo320@salidaco.com>
DON'T USE BONDO ! Unless you want to see a crack at its edges after aroound
100 hours...use Miracle Fill....mine hasn't come loose or shown edge lifting
in 9 years...Bondo has !!
John
Message 41
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: hidden pitot tube |
--> RV-List message posted by: Kevin Horton <khorton01@rogers.com>
I'm not convinced that it is quite this simple. I suspect there are
at least two potential issues:
1. There should be some energy lost in the boundary layer, so the
pitot pressure may not be quite as high as it should be.
2. The stagnation point (the spot on the leading edge where the
velocity comes to zero) moves as the angle of attch changes. So I
think any hole location would only work properly at one angle of
attack.
If it was so simple to use use a hole in the wing leading edge,
manufacturers wouldn't be spending money on pitot tubes.
It would be an interesting science experiment to have a normal pitot
tube, and a hole in the leading edge, each hooked up to an ASI. Then
we could compare the readings from the two different pitot locations.
I would be very hesitant to use a wing leading edge hole as my only
pitot source until we can find definitive proof whether it would work
properly or not.
I would love to see a good picture of the F-86 pitot source that Jim
Oke mentioned. Is it a somewhat conventional pitot tube inside the
engine inlet? If so it would sidestep the boundary layer and
stagnation point issues I mentioned.
Kevin Horton
>--> RV-List message posted by: Jim Oke <wjoke@shaw.ca>
>
>The placement of the pitot tube in the flow field around the airplane should
>not matter much. According to theory, any local increase in the velocity of
>the air (due to the shape of the wing, for instance) will cause a
>equivalent decrease in local static pressure so the total (static plus
>dynamic) pressure will remain unchanged. If this is compared to an accurate
>static pressure source, the difference is then dynamic pressure which is
>then fed to an ASI or whatever to show an airspeed indication.
>
>The reason for the long, skinny, forward-projecting pitot tubes on some
>aircraft is to move the static vents on the pitot head clear of the flow
>field and get an accurate static pressure reading. If the static pressure is
>sensed elsewhere, then no need for this. Look at an F-86 sometime, the pitot
>tube is buried inside the engine intake duct and works fine (some models
>anyway).
>
>Jim Oke
>RV-3, RV-6A
>Wpg, MB
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Evan and Megan Johnson" <evmeg@snowcrest.net>
>To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
>Subject: RV-List: hidden pitot tube
>
>
>> --> RV-List message posted by: "Evan and Megan Johnson"
><evmeg@snowcrest.net>
>>
>> A question for those of you in the know....I was looking at a Diamond
>aircraft this morning and a friend pointed out that the pitot tube is
>completly hidden in the leading edge of the wing...just a 1/4 hole!? Can
>this be done on an RV wing? It would be cool to have no pitot sticking out
>in the wind, but I dont know if the front of the leading edge is undisturbed
>air. It certainly is as it passes over the leading edge. Instinct tells me
>that the air pressure would be changed right at the leading edge and the
>airspeed readings would be inaccurate....but Diamond does it. Hmmmmmm any
>thoughts?
>> Thanks ...Evan
> >
>>
Message 42
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: Bobby Hester <bhester@hopkinsville.net>
Gary Zilik wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: Gary Zilik <zilik@direcpc.com>
>
>I've had my seat belt and shoulder harness as tight as possible and hit
>bumps in my slider 6a and wondered why the canopy did not break. A word
>to the wise; remove the button from the top of your ball cap, it will
>save your scull.
>
>Z
>
>
I'm surprised that no one has metioned Peltor. They have a very thin
head band and seem to be a very good quality headset.
--
Surfing the Web from Hopkinsville, KY
Visit my web site at: http://www.geocities.com/hester-hoptown/RVSite/
RV7A Slowbuild wings-QB Fuse :-)
Message 43
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: hidden pitot tube |
--> RV-List message posted by: "jayeandscott" <jayeandscott@telus.net>
I would love to see a good picture of the F-86 pitot source that Jim
Oke mentioned. Is it a somewhat conventional pitot tube inside the
engine inlet?
I wonder if this was one of the tubes used to provide the engine's FCU with an
ambient pressure signal?
Scott in Vancouver
>--> RV-List message posted by: Jim Oke <wjoke@shaw.ca>
>
>The placement of the pitot tube in the flow field around the airplane should
>not matter much. According to theory, any local increase in the velocity of
>the air (due to the shape of the wing, for instance) will cause a
>equivalent decrease in local static pressure so the total (static plus
>dynamic) pressure will remain unchanged. If this is compared to an accurate
>static pressure source, the difference is then dynamic pressure which is
>then fed to an ASI or whatever to show an airspeed indication.
>
>The reason for the long, skinny, forward-projecting pitot tubes on some
>aircraft is to move the static vents on the pitot head clear of the flow
>field and get an accurate static pressure reading. If the static pressure is
>sensed elsewhere, then no need for this. Look at an F-86 sometime, the pitot
>tube is buried inside the engine intake duct and works fine (some models
>anyway).
>
>Jim Oke
>RV-3, RV-6A
>Wpg, MB
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Evan and Megan Johnson" <evmeg@snowcrest.net>
>To: <rv-list@matronics.com>
>Subject: RV-List: hidden pitot tube
>
>
>> --> RV-List message posted by: "Evan and Megan Johnson"
><evmeg@snowcrest.net>
>>
>> A question for those of you in the know....I was looking at a Diamond
>aircraft this morning and a friend pointed out that the pitot tube is
>completly hidden in the leading edge of the wing...just a 1/4 hole!? Can
>this be done on an RV wing? It would be cool to have no pitot sticking out
>in the wind, but I dont know if the front of the leading edge is undisturbed
>air. It certainly is as it passes over the leading edge. Instinct tells me
>that the air pressure would be changed right at the leading edge and the
>airspeed readings would be inaccurate....but Diamond does it. Hmmmmmm any
>thoughts?
>> Thanks ...Evan
> >
>>
Message 44
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-List Skidding |
--> RV-List message posted by: "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net>
Tape a several strings about 6 inches long each across the top of the engine
cowling - they will show local airflow, which will probably be
affected/modified by the spiraling prop wash. We had a single yaw string on
the nose of the F-84F which was quite informative - of course we had no prop
to "modify" the straight back flow of air. It was good for showing yaw.
On a tractor prop plane, starting with several strings may reveal that 1
particular one would be best - might even try taping a second row on the
front area of the canopy - further aft from prop - but airflow will be
"splitting"/going around the canopy so don't know how true the reading will
be. See how the strings compare with the slip indicator. You might find a
combination that gives you confidence that you are flying straight.
David
----- Original Message -----
From: <smoothweasel@juno.com>
Subject: RV-List: RV-List Skidding
> --> RV-List message posted by: smoothweasel@juno.com
>
> Hey Guys, Is it possible to have a plane flying in a skid ( sideways )
> with the turn coordinator ball in the center????
> I have already checked that the instrument was installed level to the
> aircraft. Any ideas??? Fairings out of line????
>
> Weasel Graber
>
>
Message 45
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
<RV7and7A@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: | Info on RV8 at LOE |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Darwin N. Barrie" <ktlkrn@cox.net>
There was an RV8 at Las Cruses that is owned by Marvin Brott. Anyone know him or
have an email address for him. I'd like to talk to him about his plane.
Darwin N. Barrie
Chandler AZ
Message 46
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: IO-360 Engine problem |
--> RV-List message posted by: Jason Sneed <n242ds@cox.net>
what was the OAT that day?
On Mar 27, 2004, at 12:23 PM, RVEIGHTA@aol.com wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: RVEIGHTA@aol.com
>
> All, my IO-360 has begun to run strange at low rpm after it has warmed
> up. I
> noticed this when taxiing into the FBO yesterday - the engine would run
> smooth, then it would drop rpm then pick back up again. At any thing
> above about
> 1200-1300 rpm the engine is fine.
>
> Any thoughts about what could be the cause? Improper idle mixture
> adjustment
> maybe? The engine should show a slight rise in rpm when the mixture
> lever is
> brought back to idle cutoff, but doesn't, which is an indicator of idle
> mixture problem (I think).
>
> Walt Shipley RV-8A 81 hrs
>
>
> _-
> =======================================================================
> _-
> =======================================================================
> _-
> =======================================================================
> _-
> =======================================================================
> >
>
>
Jason Sneed
Commercial Lending Officer
First National Bank and Trust
Message 47
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Rv-List Skidding |
--> RV-List message posted by: smoothweasel@juno.com
Hey Thanx to all for the info. on skidding I seem to have finally decided
that it is flying true!
Weasel
Message 48
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: "Jim Jewell" <jjewell@telus.net>
Hi Garry,
Yours maybe,......... the wife says my skull is way too thick {[;-)!!
Jim in Kelowna do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Zilik" <zilik@direcpc.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets
> --> RV-List message posted by: Gary Zilik <zilik@direcpc.com>
>
> I've had my seat belt and shoulder harness as tight as possible and hit
> bumps in my slider 6a and wondered why the canopy did not break. A word
> to the wise; remove the button from the top of your ball cap, it will
> save your scull.
>
> Z
>
> John Danielson wrote:
>
> >--> RV-List message posted by: "John Danielson" <Jdaniel343@bresnan.net>
> >
> >I am 5'6". I also have DJ seats with the booster and the child cushion.
At
> >first I only used the booster, but was not making the best landings. I
then
> >tried the child booster cushion and my landings greatly improved.
> >I still have about 1" clearance between my head and the canopy. I have
> >bumped my head 2 or 3 times in very turbulent air. Really not too much of
a
> >problem in the seatbelt and harnesses are sinched down.
> >Van is correct in assesment of sitting a tall as possible.
> >John Danielson
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Message 49
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV-6/6A canopy headroom and headsets |
--> RV-List message posted by: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv@earthlink.net>
Bobby Hester wrote:
>--> RV-List message posted by: Bobby Hester <bhester@hopkinsville.net>
>
>Gary Zilik wrote:
>
>
>
>>--> RV-List message posted by: Gary Zilik <zilik@direcpc.com>
>>
>>I've had my seat belt and shoulder harness as tight as possible and hit
>>bumps in my slider 6a and wondered why the canopy did not break. A word
>>to the wise; remove the button from the top of your ball cap, it will
>>save your scull.
>>
>>Z
>>
>>
>>
>>
>I'm surprised that no one has metioned Peltor. They have a very thin
>head band and seem to be a very good quality headset.
>
>
>
At 6'3" using Peltors I have no problem with head room. Yes I am close
to the canopy but not a problem IMO.
Make adjustments with your seat cushions. As someone else mentioned take
the seatback adjustment off and let the
seat back rest against the rail. IMO Peltors are the best non noise
canceling headsets
Jerry
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|